Showing posts with label Stephen Lawrence. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Stephen Lawrence. Show all posts

7 May 2026

The Manufacture of an ‘Anti-Semitism’ Crisis

Open Letter to the Green Party Council and Members - The anti-Semitism smear that ruined Corbyn’s Labour now targets the Greens Polanski must not repeat Jeremy Corbyn’s mistakes

Institutional racism in Met ‘worse now’ than after Macpherson inquiry, says former officer

Yesterday it was announced that 100 police officers were to be deployed in Jewish areas of London to prevent the non-existent anti-Semitism crisis from growing. The only benefit of this will be that there are less police officers to harass Black people in other parts of London!




Never before have police deployed to stop racist attacks on a community. Usually they have increased the threat. It is not for nothing that after the Stephen Lawrence murder the Metropolitan turned their attention, not to catching the killers but to infiltrating the defence campaign.

After a long campaign the MacPherson Inquiry branded the Met institutionally racist. Baroness Casey found years later that the Met hadn’t changed in the slightest. If anything they had become worse.

As crisis and war grow in the Middle East with Israel’s war on the Lebanese people accompanying the Genocide in Gaza and the War on Iran, so consent is being manufactured for British support for Israel and Zionism. It is not enough that we have been supplying weapons to the IDF.

Almost immediately Keir Starmer held a press conference to announce that demonstrations against genocide in Gaza were connected with the knife attack in Golders Green. Not even the slightest evidence was put forward to justify his naked exploitation of the attack.

Opinion: Unbelievably, Keir Starmer can now be compared to Boris Johnson

The far more likely explanation for any rise in anti-Semitism, is the determination of the Board of Deputies to claim that British Jews support the Genocide in  Gaza. Starmer, who as Paul Holden showed, had gained the leadership of the Labour Party through outright fraud, was once again demonstrating his amazing talent for being more dishonest than Boris Johnson, which is quite an achievement.

The contrast between the attacks on Muslims and Jews is little less than astounding. Last year twenty-seven mosques in the UK were attacked between July and October. The Peacehaven Mosque which is just along the sea from Brighton was burnt to the ground. There was no press hysteria, no Starmer press conference. A few reports, mostly local and that was it.

Brighton & Hove Reform's Halloween Poster

There were certainly no special police units assembled, in Brighton or elsewhere. Racism against Black and Brown people is a feature of life. The party likely to win the most council seats is the overtly racist Reform party many of whose members are simply fascists. Deportation is on their agenda as are the threats of ICE-type squads.

The press and media have descended into an orgy of confected hysteria in their desire to exploit and manipulate Jewish fears of attack. It is not the attacks themselves but the hysteria of the press, police and politicians which is driving Jewish fears. Talk of British Jews going to Israel by Zionists deliberately compounds the stupidity. There is nowhere in the world that is more dangerous to Jews than Israel.

Three people are stabbed every day in London. Over one thousand people a year, of all religions and none. None of these ever warrant a national prime ministerial TV address. But when two Jewish people are stabbed it is as if it is Kristallnacht again. If it had been two Muslims instead of one who had been stabbed the chances of Starmer going on prime time TV to condemn Zionist attacks on Muslims are about minus zero.

Tell Mama documented 3,680 offline incidents in 2024, which includes assaults and vandalism, representing a 72% increase compared to two years prior. Cases of physical assault against Muslims rose by 73% between 2023 and 2024 whereas physical assaults against Jews are extremely low. The manipulation of ‘anti-Semitism’ incidents against Jews only occurs because the statistics include opposition to Israel and support for Palestine in them. They are blatantly manipulated.

In the y/e March 2025 there was a 6% increase in race hate crimes and a 3% increase in religious hate crimes recorded by the police (excluding the MPS). There were falls in the other 3 strands, sexual orientation (down 2%), disability (down 8%) and transgender (down 11%)

There was a 19% increase in religious hate crimes targeted at Muslims (excluding the MPS), with a spike in these offences seen at the time of the Southport murders and subsequent disorder

Labour's Svengali style anti-Semitic cartoon

Abdul Wali Mamozai, a Muslim man, was murdered in Bracknell on 27 April, a few days before a mentally ill man wounded two Jewish people — and one Muslim man — in London. Yet we heard next to nothing about this.

Today is the day that people vote in the local elections. Reform are tipped to win the most seats, Labour is heading towards a meltdown, the Tories will also lose out and the Greens are expected to win 500 seats.

Daily Mail's anti-Semitic caricature

That is why the Tory press has been going hell for leather on the theme that the Green Party is anti-Semitic and in the words of the paper that loved Hitler, Polanski’s Greens Are A ‘Party Of Poison’. The Daily Mail, like all the papers, is seriously worried about ‘anti-Semitism’.

Times' Antisemitic cartoon

Of course that hasn’t stopped The Times, Mail, Sun & Telegraph from publishing anti-Semitic caricatures of Zack Polanski with all the features of typical Nazi style cartoons. All of this is quite understandable because anti-Semites have always been the main supporters of Zionism and at the root of all the concern about anti-Semitism is support for Israel, i.e. British foreign policy in the Middle East.

Times' Antisemitic cartoon

Mark Rowley, Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police, who is supposed to be a civil servant, couldn’t resist joining in the fray with an Open Letter to Polanski because the latter had condemned the fact that the Police had kicked in the head 10 times the person who is alleged to have stabbed people.

The Police had previously not disclosed in their public relations that the person who had stabbed two Jewish people had also stabbed a Muslim man earlier in the morning. The guy had mental health problems too which casts doubt over whether anti-Semitism was the main motive.

"Any comment on the man who raped a Sikh woman solely because he thought she was Muslim?" one social media user said in reply to Starmer on social media, referring to a case which was concluded in April, with the attacker receiving a life sentence.

Similar questions were put to Tory leader Kemi Badenoch, who, in a recent interview with LBC host Nick Ferrari, appeared to imply that attacks on Black communities attract greater attention than those on the Jewish community. Badenoch at the same time as advocating the banning of pro-Palestine marches was all in favour of Tommy Robinson’s fash fest. 

This aspect didn’t feature strongly in the newspaper coverage either because it was one of those inconvenient facts.

What we are seeing is a rerun of the Corbyn playbook with false anti-Semitism smears now being directed at the Green Party. Unfortunately the Green Party and Polanski show every sign of following in the footsteps of Jeremy Corbyn and treating in good faith the allegations of bad faith actors.

That is why I wrote an article for Al Jazeera on The anti-Semitism smear that ruined Corbyn’s Labour now targets the Greens warning that Zack Polanski must not repeat Jeremy Corbyn’s mistakes’. As people will know I was suspended on vague allegations of ‘documented’ anti-Semitism on April 16. Well known film producer Mark Adderley has been suspended as have about 30 other Council candidates. Instead of defending its candidates the Green Party is showing every sign of following Corbyn into the wilderness.

In the article I describe the genesis of the false anti-Semitism smears now being directed at the Green Party. Why now?  Because the Green Party has gone from being a fringe party that no one took seriously to a major player. It also has radical policy on the genocide in Palestine and the threat of an overt ‘Zionism is Racism’ motion was enough to trigger the fury of Israel’s defenders in the British press.

I have also written an Open Letter to the Green Party Council calling out their suspension of myself and the Green Party’s Council Candidates. I suspect that the sudden attacks on the Green Party will not have a great effect today. That was also what happened with Corbyn. Despite the initial ‘anti-Semitism’ attacks Corbyn went on to win the largest swing to Labour in 2017 that Labour had achieved since 1945.

However the Zionists and their establishment allies didn’t give up. They simply doubled down and faced with a compliant Corbyn who soon began to sing from the same hymn sheet as them the anti-Semitism attack did the trick in 2019 coupled with sabotage from the likes of Brexit Secretary Starmer.

The Green Party’s only chance will be to fight back and resist the attempts to paint them as anti-Semites because of their support for the Palestinians. Whether they will do so remains to be seen.

Tony Greenstein 

Open Letter to the Green Party Council and Members

Thursday 6 May 2026

Dear Friends,

Later today voters will be going to the polls. We shall see whether or not the vile anti-Semitic attacks of the media has had any effect on the forecast of 500 Green gains.

Of one thing we can be sure. The ‘anti-Semitism’ attacks on the Green Party will continue until they are challenged. If Jeremy Corbyn’s electoral success in 2017 is anything to go by, these same bad faith actors will redouble their efforts.

Although the pretext for their attacks is ‘anti-Semitism’ we can be sure that this is merely a pretext for other concerns such as their wealth and power. It is important that the Green Party learns the lessons of Corbyn’s period as Leader. That was why I wrote an article for Al Jazeera, which was published yesterday. I wrote:

Corbyn never once questioned the good faith of his Zionist accusers. Instead, he acted as their messenger, repeatedly apologised, promised to do better, and threw friends under the bus, eventually echoing his opponents’ narrative.... he even said that anyone who denied the anti-Semitism “problem” in Labour was “contributing to the problem”.

Corbyn’s strategy of appeasement... was a disaster. His opponents simply demanded more and more concessions. Eventually, Corbyn became a victim of the witch-hunt... and he, too, was expelled.

I have been suspended on the basis of 11 words: ‘Documented history of antisemitism, including court decisions and recent terrorism charges.’ Despite repeatedly writing asking for clarification, none has been forthcoming. As the Public Interest Law Centre wrote on 1 May:

There are serious concerns regarding the lack of due process, failures to adhere to the Party’s own internal policies and procedures, and the failure to properly particularise the allegations made against him. In particular, the complaints have not been set out with sufficient clarity or supported by evidence. Mr Greenstein is therefore clearly being prevented from a fair and informed opportunity to respond.

No evidence has been forthcoming, I have not been given a copy of the complaint nor the identity of the complainant, still less the documentation referred to. In short the process is Kafkaesque.

What is also clear is that the complaint is not based on anything I have done. It is purely political and that is why it is inappropriate to keep it confidential. That protects my accusers not me.

The same goes for the Council candidates who have been suspended and thrown to the wolves. I referred in particular to the case against Mark Adderley in my Open Letter to Zack Polanski.

The allegations against Mark are based on the IHRA Definition of Anti-Semitism rather than the Jerusalem Declaration on Anti-Semitism, even though both are Green Party policy. The IHRA conflates anti-Semitism and anti-Zionism. Its principal author, American academic Kenneth Stern, in testimony to Congress in November 2017, wrote that

The definition was not drafted, and was never intended, as a tool to target or chill speech on a college campus. In fact, at a conference in 2010 ..., I highlighted this misuse, and the damage it could do....

A Holocaust survivor was required to change the title of a campus talk, and the university mandated it be recorded, after an Israeli diplomat complained that the title violated the definition.

Perhaps most egregious, an off-campus group citing the definition called on a university to conduct an inquiry of a professor (who received her PhD from Columbia) for antisemitism, based on an article she had written years before. The university then conducted the inquiry. And while it ultimately found no basis to discipline the professor, the exercise itself was chilling and McCarthy-like.

What the Green Party has done, with the suspension Mark Adderly, myself and others, is to embark on a McCarthyite exercise whose purpose is to chill free speech. Mark is charged with having ‘Made antisemitic comments comparing Israel to Nazi Germany.’

This is the 10th of the 11 ‘illustrations’ of anti-Semitism in the IHRA. By way of contrast the JDA does NOT state that comparisons with Nazi Germany are anti-Semitic. What it does state is that

Thus, even if contentious, it is not antisemitic, in and of itself, to compare Israel with other historical cases, including settler-colonialism or apartheid.

It is noteworthy that the person(s) who formulated the charges against Mark chose to rely on a Zionist definition of anti-Semitism rather than one emanating from hundreds of scholars of Holocaust history, Jewish studies, and Middle East studies, most of whom are Jewish.

In other words the witchhunt in the Green Party is being driven by Zionist members of the GPC, people who subscribe to a racist ideology. Of course we have not been given a clue as to the identity of those who drew up the charges. Clearly they prefer to work in the shadows.

As I mentioned in my Open Letter comparisons between Israel and Nazi Germany are legion, especially among holocaust survivors. To give but one example, Shlomo Shmelzman, a survivor of the Warsaw Ghetto, stated that:

In my childhood I have suffered fear, hunger and humiliation when I passed from the Warsaw Ghetto, through labor camps, to Buchenwald. Today, as a citizen of Israel, I cannot accept the systematic destruction of cities, towns, and refugee camps… I hear too many familiar sounds today…. I hear “dirty Arabs” and I remember “dirty Jews.” I hear about “closed areas” and I remember ghettos and camps. I hear “two-legged beasts” and I remember “Untermenschen.”… Too many things in Israel remind me of too many things from my childhood.

Israel claims its legitimacy from the Nazi holocaust. That is why comparisons between their behaviour and the Nazis are appropriate. When 60% of Israelis want to exterminate every Palestinian in Gaza and when 57% want to deport every Arab citizen of Israel, then the comparison with Nazi Germany is highly relevant.

For those with doubts I suggest watching Owen Jones’ podcast Israel’s VILEST Crime Yet - The Evidence Is Overwhelming about Israel training dogs to rape people. The last time this occurred was in Pinochet’s Chile under Ingrid Olderöck, who was a proud Nazi.

Already Backing Down

The Green Party can go down the road that Corbyn took or it can fight back against the accusations of ‘anti-Semitism’. It is an argument that can be won. The TimesMail and other papers use anti-Semitic caricatures because for them anti-Semitism is not hostility to Jews but hostility to Zionism.



Black and Muslim members, who are 75% of those suspended, now find that their membership of the Green Party is in doubt whereas it should be those who have made these malicious complaints whose membership is in jeopardy. Elise Benjamin, who is the driving force behind the ‘anti-Semitism’ attacks is on record as saying that ‘the party’s recent surge in the polls.... feels very hollow – almost like a bereavement.” Clearly her loyalties lie elsewhere.

Whether I am expelled on a trumped up charge is neither here nor there. What matters is whether the Green Party, having adopted a popular set of policies is going to be thwarted by the same forces who fraudulently contrived to impose upon the Labour Party a leader for whom truth and lies are mere matters of convenience. I refer of course to Keir Starmer.

Solidarity,

Tony Greenstein

 

18 December 2025

Lammy is Happy to Allow the Hunger Strikers To Die & for the Zionist Genocide to Continue – Globalise the Intifada

The Met Police Offered Sympathy to the Victims of the Sydney Attack but none to the Palestinian Victims of Israeli Genocide – this is what Police Racism is All About



PALESTINE DEMONSTRATION OUTSIDE JUSTICE MINISTRY IN SUPPORT OF THE HUNGER STRIKERS 17 December 2025

Zarah Sultana is to be congratulated for taking the initiative last night and standing outside HMP Bronzefield whilst the scumbags that Sodexho employs were denying medical treatment and refusing to call an ambulance to Qesser Zuhra.

Eventually, after a number of arrests and the usual police violence coupled with energetic protests by those who had congregated outside an ambulance was called.

Tonight's demonstration outside the Injustice Ministry


I repeatedly rang HMP Bronzefield last night and was left speaking to an answer phone or a phone that just kept ringing. Clearly the duty of care to prisoners at this privatised prison is non-existent.


Tonight I attended a demonstration outside the Justice Ministry which Palestine Solidarity Campaign had belatedly called. The Police presence was heavy and intimidating but nonetheless a thousand people gathered to show their solidarity. The Police had earlier banned the demonstration from Downing Street as it might ‘interfere’ with a Chanukah celebration in Trafalgar Square.

Tonight's demonstration outside the Injustice Ministry

Once again the racist Metropolitan Police use ‘anti-Semitism’ as the excuse to attack Palestine solidarity and then they claim they are not political.

In a joint statement with Manchester Police, the Met has also banned the use of ‘Globalise the Intifada’ slogan. This despite their admitting that the CPS has ruled against it legally. Thus we see the police state in formation as a nakedly political police takes over.

The Palestine Solidarity movement must now make this slogan, just as we made, ‘Palestine will be free, from the river to the sea’ our slogan. Let the Met try and arrest us all.

The Met and GMP offered their condolences to the victims of the Australian terror attack. When have they ever offered their condolences to the Palestinian victims of the Zionists?

Their racism is on display for all to see. It stretches from Stephen Lawrence all the way to Palestine.

The BBC reported tonight that two of the hunger strikers, Jon Cink and Umer Khalid, have ended their hunger strike. I say this reluctantly but I believe that now is the time to end all the hunger strikes. They have served their purpose, which is highlighting the gross injustice of opponents of genocide being remanded in custody whilst the supporters of the genocide are free to peddle their lies.  We do not want to see anyone die and it is quite clear that Starmer and Lammy are quite prepared to allow them to die.

Tony Greenstein

30 October 2025

The ‘Anti-Semitism’ Witch-Hunt that Targets Rameh Aladwan is itself Anti-Semitic – Despite Having Been Found to Have No Case to Answer She is Being Tried Again

Dr Rahmeh’s Only Offence is  Being a Palestinian & Opposing the Genocide that Starmer & Streeting Have Enabled

IF you are JEWISH please sign the

Statement in Support of Dr Rahmeh Aladwan, the British-Palestinian Doctor Who is Being Persecuted by the General Medical Council and Wes Streeting

Link here

https://forms.gle/cnVMGb2ubD3edKY97


Video of the Arrest of Dr Rahmeh Aladwan

Last Tuesday, Dr Rahmeh Aladwan was arrested by the Metropolitan Police for three offences of making malicious communications and one offence of inciting racial hatred. What was the basis of these allegations? Well the Police officer arresting her told Rahmeh that on 21 July, at a demonstration outside the Foreign & Commonwealth Office she called for the eradication of the State of Israel.

Since when have calls for eradicating the genocidal and apartheid Israeli state been tantamount to inciting racial hatred or ‘anti-Semitism’? This could only be a possible offence if there is an inseparable link between Israeli Apartheid and British Jews. Clearly the numbskulls of the Metropolitan Police, especially their racist Commissioner Mark Rowley, have never heard of anti-Zionist Jews.

British police arrest doctor for opposing Gaza genocide, with Asa Winstanley

So a question to those who dreamt up these charges. Were calls to abolish the Nazi state an example of anti-German racism?  Or calls to abolish or eradicate the Apartheid South African State anti-White racism?  To merely ask the question is to answer it.

If anyone is being anti-Semitic it is the Metropolitan Police, who never lose an opportunity to link British Jews with Zionism’s genocide. It should never be forgotten that when Hitler was alive and kicking his disciples in the form of the British Union of Fascists were marching through the Jewish East End of London protected by the same Met Police who are now so concerned with ‘anti-Semitism’.

The Met are no more concerned about anti-Semitism than they are about any other form of racism. The Met are a cesspit of racism. They have repeatedly been found to be institutionally racist by the MacPherson Inquiry into the murder of Stephen Lawrence and even by Thatcherite Baronness Louise Casey. Only in the past month Police at Charing Cross Police have been caught out up to their old tricks in a Panorama programme.

The sincerity of the Met can be gauged by the fact that they haven’t arrested a single Zionist for glorifying in and denying the genocide that Israel is carrying out in Gaza. If the government denies there is a genocide then why should the Met contradict them?

Although Rahmeh has been the target of the viciously racist pro-Israel lobby – the so-called Campaign Against Antisemitism and the equally poisonous UK Lawyers for Israel [UKLFI], it is the British state that has moved into action.  Jews for them are a convenient alibi and pretext. The attack on Palestine solidarity activists is because British foreign policy is joined at the hip with that of the United States and Israel.

It is important not to invert this and believe that the British state is acting on behalf of the Israeli state and its stooges like the Board of Deputies. British imperialism has always been pro-Zionist as has the United States.  Israel is their racist Rottweiler in the Middle East.

Dr Radwan’s treatment has been disgraceful, even by British standards. In effect, having been found not guilty at her first hearing that despicable apology for a human being, the corrupt Wes Streeting demanded a rehearing of the charges. See here.

A Google search produces this entry yet the page can't be found

Dr Radwan was first referred to a hearing of the Medical Practitioner Tribunal Service by the General Medical Council [GMC] on 27 August. At the hearing on 25 September the GMC asked for conditions to be placed on Dr Radwan’s practice and the MPTS refused. She was found to have no case to answer. It appears that this decision has been scrubbed from the Internet. Although it appears in a Google search the page itself has disappeared. The Tribunal found that

·         There was no evidence that patient safety had been put at risk.

·         The GMC’s concerns arose solely from political statements, not from Dr Aladwan’s clinical practice, which remains unblemished.

·         A “reasonable and fully informed member of the public” would not be alarmed to learn that she continued unrestricted practice while the investigation proceeds.

In Place of the Missing Page

There was a fierce backlash from Streeting, who only held his seat in Ilford North by 500 votes, against the British Palestinian Leanne Mohammed. On 6 October Streeting was quoted in The Times as calling for medical institutions to ‘crack down on antisemitism’.

The issue was posed in terms of the danger to Jewish patients. Streeting warned that hospitals and medical institutions are “completely failing to protect Jewish patients”. The fact that these lies are carried without comment demonstrates the lengths the British press is willing to go to support Israel. There isn’t one verifiable example of a doctor with Palestinian sympathies injuring or failing to care for someone who is Jewish. Not one example.

However the treatment of Black and Muslim people in the NHS is a different matter. A third of Black and Ethnic Minority staff face racist abuse at work. Not that you would know from Streeting’s comments. His only concern are for a section of White people.  His allegations are completely unevidenced but were nonetheless seized upon by the Tory press.

The first ten NHS doctors to die of COVID were predominantly Muslim and from either a Black, Asian or Arabic background. Black and minority ethnic people are 40 percent more likely to access mental health services via the criminal justice system than white people. But this kind of racism is not something that Streeting, The Times or Telegraph is concerned with.

After a campaign by the Israel funded, so-called Campaign Against Antisemitism [CAA] (which is really a Campaign Against the Palestinians) the GMC rereferred Dr Aladwan’s case back to the MPTS on 3 October.  A hearing of the MPTS was held on 23 October and the MPTS agreed to hear the case again although it had already dismissed it previously.

At the second hearing on 23 Oct the GMC asked for the suspension of Dr Aladwan and the inclusion of all material from first hearing, which the MPTS agreed to. This is going to go ahead to a 3 day hearing date on a date yet to be confirmed. The GMC even want to add material they had before the first hearing but didn't submit. The video below and also this tweet explains the whole of this torturous attempt at the crucifixion of Dr Aladwan.

Dr Rahmeh Aladwan's Instagram Post Explaining the Background to her Case Before the MPTS

One factor in all of this has been the supine behaviour of the GMC which has  done its best to persecute Dr Aladwan.  Yet when it comes to genuine anti-Semitism from Zionists it behaves entirely differently. On 21 January 2024 I received a message from a Justin Stebbing which read:

At first I thought it was either from a neo-Nazi or a lunatic or both.  I wasn’t far wrong.  He is a lunatic Zionist. Justin Stebbing is a visiting professor at Imperial College and he is still listed on their website.

It is interesting to contrast the witch-hunt against Dr Aladwan, who hasn’t made any remotely similar comments with that of Stebbing. Imperial College in the form of HR Director, Harbhajan Brar, refused to do anything. I complained to the Met Police who were also reluctant to do anything. Eventually Sussex Police referred a complaint to the Crown Prosecution Service who also refused to do anything.  The Police Officer in the case informed me that the CPS had concluded that

a jury would be unlikely to conclude that he meant what he said literally, based on the surrounding circumstances, so there was no realistic prospect of conviction if the matter went to court.

Stebbing claimed that his remarks were ironic and he hadn’t meant them. There was nothing ironic about them. Sending someone Jewish an email out of the blue (because I’d never had contact with this reptile before) saying that all Jews should be gassed is clearly malicious as per the Malicious Communications Act under which Dr Radwan has been arrested. But of course the CPS is a highly political animal and it knows better than to prosecute a prominent Zionist.

I also complained to the GMC. Given their hyper activity in Dr Radwan’s case one might suppose that they would have been eager to suspend Stebbing. It was not as if he didn’t have form. In December 2021 he was suspended by the MPTS for nine months.

Stebbing was guilty of a “cavalier” approach in the way he treated some patients. This including sending “inappropriate” emails to a dying patient he nicknamed LMT (Little Miss Trouble). It would seem that I wasn’t the first victim of Stebbing.

But in my case the GMC exonerated him without even a reprimand. Stebbing was defended by UKLFI and by the CAA.  So what we have are the two most prominent Zionist organisations involved in making false ‘anti-Semitism’ allegations against Palestinian supporters defending someone guilty of making vile anti-Semitic comments about gassing Jews. This is par for the course with Zionists. They have never had any objection to genuine anti-Semitism, only anti-Zionism.

In the process the CAA/UKLFI alleged that I had been found guilty of being a ‘notorious anti-Semite’ myself when I made an unsuccessful libel claim against the CAA. However even the GMC was aware that in libel a defence of honest opinion merely finds the libel hasn’t been proven, not that it was correct. This in itself is an indication of the dishonesty of these Zionist organisations. The GMC nonetheless found that

Yet despite this finding the GMC declined to apply any penalty. The contrast with Dr Radwan, who has made no offensive remarks to anyone Jewish, even if some of her comments regarding ‘Jewish supremacy’ may be over the top, is astonishing. It is as clear a case of double standards as one could hope to find.


The justification for not imposing a warning on Stebbing is equally astonishing:

The double standards are self-evident. Criticism of Israel and Zionism is a hanging offence. Telling someone Jewish that all Jews should have been gassed is something that can be treated leniently. Incidentally the blacked out portions of the decision almost certainly relate to Stebbing’s previous striking off from the register which suggest that such an emotionally charged man is certainly not someone who should be near patients.  Again in contrast to Dr Aladwan who has handled herself with great aplomb and poise.

The full GMC decision can be downloaded here.

It is clear from the behaviour of the Police, CPS, GMC and Imperial College that when it comes to genuine anti-Semitism from Zionists and supporters of Israel, then the traditional defences go up.  Accusations of false anti-Semitism when made in support of Genocide in Palestine are, by contrast, treated seriously.

The lesson to draw from this is that the purported concern over anti-Semitism by the Met Police and the State in this and other cases is entirely spurious. Likewise the defence of Stebbing by the CAA and UKLFI demonstrates that these organisations are only interested in ‘anti-Semitism’ when defence of Israel is on the agenda.

This should also be a lesson to those in the Palestine solidarity movement who believe that the British state is genuinely concerned with anti-Semitism. It is the same with Donald Trump in the United States whose racism is a matter of record. But when it comes to ‘anti-Semitism’ and the ‘plight’ of Zionist Jewish students on campus Trump was so concerned that he threatened universities with defunding unless they fell into line and policed discourse on campus, in particular courses covering the Middle East.

Just as an addendum.  Rahmeh has attributed support for Israel amongst British Jews to ‘Jewish Supremacism’.  I think this is wrong. The reasons why British Jews have tended to support Israel are complex but racial superiority is confined to a minority of Zionist zealots such as Jonathan Hoffman.

The Jewish community in Britain has moved decisively to the right since 1945 when half the vote for Phil Piratin, the Communist candidate in the Mile End constituency in the East End, resulted in the first Jewish Communist MP.

In 1979 when both a Communist and a National Front candidate stood in Hackney North at the General Election, Professor Geoffrey Alderman could not discern a single Jewish vote for the Communist but estimated that a few hundred Jews voted for the holocaust denying National Front.

Zionism as a settler colonial and imperialist ideology is clearly attractive to those on the right. Coupled with its sense of victimhood arising out of the weaponisation of the holocaust, British Jews have been complicit in enabling Starmer and Lammy to support Israel’s genocide. However it would be wrong to ascribe the support of the British state to either the Zionist lobby or British Jews. The latter are the State’s moral alibi. It is not why the British state supports Israel.

Notwithstanding the above it is incumbent upon anti-Zionist Jews to give their full support to Rahmeh in her battles with the Medical Establishment and the Metropolitan Police. She is being attacked, not because of anti-Semitism but because she is a supporter of the Palestinians.

Tony Greenstein