The Met Police Offered Sympathy to the Victims of the Sydney Attack but
none to the Palestinian Victims of Israeli Genocide – this is what Police
Racism is All About
PALESTINE DEMONSTRATION OUTSIDE JUSTICE MINISTRY IN SUPPORT OF THE HUNGER STRIKERS 17 December 2025
Zarah Sultana is to be congratulated for taking the
initiative last night and standing outside
HMP Bronzefield whilst the scumbags that Sodexho employs were denying medical
treatment and refusing to call an ambulance to Qesser
Zuhra.
Eventually, after a number
of arrests and the usual police violence coupled with energetic protests by
those who had congregated outside an ambulance was called.
Tonight's demonstration outside the Injustice Ministry
I’m not leaving until HMP Bronzefield accept an ambulance to transfer hunger striker Qesser Zuhrah to hospital for urgent medical care that she desperately needs. pic.twitter.com/AVpPFOT6lE
I repeatedly rang HMP
Bronzefield last night and was left speaking to an answer phone or a phone that
just kept ringing. Clearly the duty of care to prisoners at this privatised
prison is non-existent.
Tonight I attended a
demonstration outside the Justice Ministry which Palestine Solidarity Campaign had
belatedly called. The Police presence was heavy and intimidating but
nonetheless a thousand people gathered to show their solidarity. The Police had
earlier banned the demonstration from Downing Street as it might ‘interfere’
with a Chanukah celebration in Trafalgar Square.
Tonight's demonstration outside the Injustice Ministry
Once again the racist
Metropolitan Police use ‘anti-Semitism’ as the excuse to attack Palestine
solidarity and then they claim they are not political.
In a joint statement with
Manchester Police, the Met has also banned
the use of ‘Globalise the Intifada’ slogan. This despite their admitting that
the CPS has ruled against it legally. Thus we see the police state in formation
as a nakedly political police takes over.
The Palestine
Solidarity movement must now make this slogan, just as we made, ‘Palestine will be free, from the river to the
sea’ our slogan. Let the Met try and arrest us all.
have you ever offered any sympathy to the 100,000+ Palestinian victims of genocide @metpoliceuk? you are becoming more and more a political police force https://t.co/6s2dJ4owTD
— Tony Greenstein tonygreenstein.com (@TonyGreenstein) December 17, 2025
The Met and GMP offered
their condolences to the victims of the Australian terror attack. When have
they ever offered their condolences to the Palestinian victims of the Zionists?
Their racism is on
display for all to see. It stretches from Stephen Lawrence all the way to Palestine.
The BBC reported tonight
that two of the hunger strikers, Jon Cink and Umer
Khalid, have ended their hunger strike. I say this reluctantly but I believe
that now is the time to end all the hunger strikes. They have served their
purpose, which is highlighting the gross injustice of opponents of genocide
being remanded in custody whilst the supporters of the genocide are free to peddle
their lies.We do not want to see anyone
die and it is quite clear that Starmer and Lammy are quite prepared to allow them
to die.
Last Tuesday, Dr Rahmeh Aladwan was arrested by the
Metropolitan Police for three offences of making malicious communications and
one offence of inciting racial hatred. What was the basis of these allegations?
Well the Police officer arresting her told Rahmeh that on 21 July, at a
demonstration outside the Foreign & Commonwealth Office she called for the
eradication of the State of Israel.
Since when have calls for eradicating the
genocidal and apartheid Israeli state been tantamount to inciting racial hatred
or ‘anti-Semitism’? This could only be a possible offence if there is an
inseparable link between Israeli Apartheid and British Jews. Clearly the
numbskulls of the Metropolitan Police, especially their racist Commissioner
Mark Rowley, have never heard of anti-Zionist Jews.
British police arrest doctor for opposing Gaza genocide, with Asa Winstanley
So a question to those who dreamt up these
charges. Were calls to abolish the Nazi state an example of anti-German
racism?Or calls to abolish or eradicate
the Apartheid South African State anti-White racism?To merely ask the question is to answer it.
If anyone is being anti-Semitic it is the
Metropolitan Police, who never lose an opportunity to link British Jews with
Zionism’s genocide. It should never be forgotten that when Hitler was alive and
kicking his disciples in the form of the British Union of Fascists were
marching through the Jewish East End of London protected
by the same Met Police who are now so concerned with ‘anti-Semitism’.
The Met are no more concerned about
anti-Semitism than they are about any other form of racism. The Met are a
cesspit of racism. They have repeatedly been found to be institutionally racist
by the MacPherson
Inquiry into the murder of Stephen Lawrence and even by Thatcherite Baronness
Louise Casey. Only in the past month Police at Charing Cross Police have
been caught out up to their old tricks in a Panorama programme.
The sincerity of the Met can be gauged by the
fact that they haven’t arrested a single Zionist for glorifying in and denying
the genocide that Israel is carrying out in Gaza. If the government denies there
is a genocide then why should the Met contradict them?
Although Rahmeh has been the target of the
viciously racist pro-Israel lobby – the so-called Campaign Against Antisemitism and the
equally poisonous UK Lawyers for Israel
[UKLFI], it is the British state that has moved into action.Jews for them are a convenient alibi and
pretext. The attack on Palestine solidarity activists is because British
foreign policy is joined at the hip with that of the United States and Israel.
It is important not to invert this and believe
that the British state is acting on behalf of the Israeli state and its stooges
like the Board of Deputies. British imperialism
has always been pro-Zionist as has the United States.Israel is their racist Rottweiler in the
Middle East.
Dr Radwan’s treatment has been disgraceful,
even by British standards. In effect, having been found not guilty at her first
hearing that despicable apology for a human being, the corrupt
Wes Streeting demanded a rehearing of the charges. See here.
The UK 'israel' lobby has pressured my government and medical board into referring me to a tribunal hearing to try and suspend me for opposing genocide. This is Britain. We are occupied.
Hi. My name is Rahmeh. I am a part-Palestinian British NHS doctor. I am facing the… pic.twitter.com/hR9U90g42o
A Google search produces this entry yet the page can't be found
Dr Radwan was first referred to a hearing of
the Medical Practitioner Tribunal Service by the General Medical Council [GMC] on
27 August. At the hearing on 25
September the GMC asked for conditions to be placed on Dr Radwan’s practice and
the MPTS refused. She was found to have no case to answer. It appears that this
decision has been scrubbed
from the Internet. Although it appears in a Google search the page itself has disappeared.
The Tribunal found
that
·There was no
evidence that patient safety had been put at risk.
·The GMC’s concerns
arose solely from political statements, not from Dr Aladwan’s clinical
practice, which remains unblemished.
·A “reasonable and
fully informed member of the public” would not be alarmed to learn that she
continued unrestricted practice while the investigation proceeds.
In Place of the Missing Page
There was a fierce backlash from Streeting,
who only held
his seat in Ilford North by 500 votes, against the British Palestinian
Leanne Mohammed. On 6 October Streeting was quoted
in The Times as calling for medical
institutions to ‘crack down on
antisemitism’.
The issue was posed in terms of the danger to
Jewish patients. Streeting warned that hospitals and medical institutions are “completely failing to protect Jewish
patients”. The fact that these lies are carried without comment demonstrates
the lengths the British press is willing to go to support Israel. There isn’t
one verifiable example of a doctor with Palestinian sympathies injuring or
failing to care for someone who is Jewish. Not one example.
However the treatment of Black and Muslim
people in the NHS is a different matter. A third of Black and Ethnic Minority
staff face
racist abuse at work. Not that you would know from Streeting’s comments.
His only concern are for a section of White people.His allegations are completely unevidenced
but were nonetheless seized upon by the Tory press.
The first ten NHS doctors to
die of COVID were predominantly Muslim and from either a Black, Asian or
Arabic background. Black and minority ethnic people are 40 percent more
likely to access mental health services via the criminal justice system
than white people. But this kind of racism is not something that Streeting, The Times or Telegraph is
concerned with.
After a campaign
by the Israel funded, so-called Campaign
Against Antisemitism [CAA] (which is really a Campaign
Against the Palestinians) the GMC rereferred Dr Aladwan’s case back to the
MPTS on 3 October.A hearing of the MPTS
was held on 23 October and the MPTS agreed
to hear the case again although it had already dismissed it previously.
At the second hearing on 23 Oct the GMC asked
for the suspension of Dr Aladwan and the inclusion of all material from first
hearing, which the MPTS agreed to. This is going to go ahead to a 3 day
hearing date on a date yet to be confirmed. The GMC even want to add
material they had before the first hearing but didn't submit. The video below
and also this tweet
explains the whole of this torturous attempt at the crucifixion of Dr Aladwan.
Dr Rahmeh Aladwan's Instagram Post Explaining
the Background to her Case Before the MPTS
One factor in all of this has been the supine
behaviour of the GMC which hasdone its
best to persecute Dr Aladwan. Yet when
it comes to genuine anti-Semitism from Zionists it behaves entirely
differently. On 21 January 2024 I received a message from a Justin Stebbing
which read:
At first I thought it was either from a neo-Nazi or a lunatic or
both.I wasn’t far wrong.He is a lunatic Zionist. Justin Stebbing is a
visiting professor at Imperial College and he is still listed on their website.
It is interesting to contrast the witch-hunt against Dr Aladwan, who
hasn’t made any remotely similar comments with that of Stebbing. Imperial
College in the form of HR Director, Harbhajan Brar, refused to do anything. I complained to the Met Police
who were also reluctant to do anything. Eventually Sussex Police referred a
complaint to the Crown Prosecution Service who also refused to do
anything.The Police Officer in the case
informed me that the CPS had concluded that
a jury would be unlikely to conclude that he meant what he said
literally, based on the surrounding circumstances, so there was no realistic
prospect of conviction if the matter went to court.
Stebbing claimed that his remarks were ironic
and he hadn’t meant them. There was nothing ironic about them. Sending someone
Jewish an email out of the blue (because I’d never had contact with this
reptile before) saying that all Jews should be gassed is clearly malicious as
per the Malicious Communications Act under which Dr Radwan has been arrested.
But of course the CPS is a highly political animal and it knows better than to
prosecute a prominent Zionist.
I also complained to the GMC. Given their
hyper activity in Dr Radwan’s case one might suppose that they would have been
eager to suspend Stebbing. It was not as if he didn’t have form. In December
2021 he was suspended
by the MPTS for nine months.
Stebbing was guilty of a “cavalier” approach
in the way he treated some patients. This including sending
“inappropriate” emails to a dying patient he nicknamed LMT (Little Miss
Trouble). It would seem that I wasn’t the first victim of Stebbing.
But in my case the GMC exonerated him without
even a reprimand. Stebbing was defended by UKLFI and by the CAA.So what we have are the two most prominent
Zionist organisations involved in making false ‘anti-Semitism’ allegations against
Palestinian supporters defending someone guilty of making vile anti-Semitic comments
about gassing Jews. This is par for the course with Zionists. They have never had
any objection to genuine anti-Semitism, only anti-Zionism.
In the process the CAA/UKLFI alleged that I
had been found guilty of being a ‘notorious anti-Semite’ myself when I made an
unsuccessful libel claim against the CAA. However even the GMC was aware that
in libel a defence of honest opinion merely finds the libel hasn’t been proven,
not that it was correct. This in itself is an indication of the dishonesty of
these Zionist organisations. The GMC nonetheless
found that
Yet despite this finding the GMC declined to apply any penalty. The
contrast with Dr Radwan, who has made no offensive remarks to anyone Jewish,
even if some of her comments regarding ‘Jewish supremacy’ may be over the top,
is astonishing. It is as clear a case of double standards as one could hope to
find.
The justification for not imposing a warning on Stebbing is equally
astonishing:
The double standards are self-evident. Criticism of Israel and Zionism
is a hanging offence. Telling someone Jewish that all Jews should have been
gassed is something that can be treated leniently. Incidentally the blacked out
portions of the decision almost certainly relate to Stebbing’s previous
striking off from the register which suggest that such an emotionally charged
man is certainly not someone who should be near patients.Again in contrast to Dr Aladwan who has
handled herself with great aplomb and poise.
It is clear from the behaviour of the Police, CPS, GMC and Imperial
College that when it comes to genuine anti-Semitism from Zionists and supporters
of Israel, then the traditional defences go up.Accusations of false anti-Semitism when made in support of Genocide in
Palestine are, by contrast, treated seriously.
The lesson to draw from this is that the purported concern over
anti-Semitism by the Met Police and the State in this and other cases is
entirely spurious. Likewise the defence of Stebbing by the CAA and UKLFI demonstrates
that these organisations are only interested in ‘anti-Semitism’ when defence of
Israel is on the agenda.
This should also be a lesson to those in the Palestine solidarity
movement who believe that the British state is genuinely concerned with
anti-Semitism. It is the same with Donald Trump in the United States
whose racism is a matter of record. But when it comes to ‘anti-Semitism’ and
the ‘plight’ of Zionist Jewish students on campus Trump was so concerned
that he threatened universities with defunding unless they fell into line and
policed discourse on campus, in particular courses covering the Middle East.
Just as an addendum. Rahmeh has
attributed support for Israel amongst British Jews to ‘Jewish
Supremacism’.I think this is wrong. The
reasons why British Jews have tended to support Israel are complex but racial
superiority is confined to a minority of Zionist zealots such as Jonathan
Hoffman.
The Jewish community in Britain has moved decisively to the right since
1945 when half
the vote for Phil Piratin, the Communist candidate in the Mile End
constituency in the East End, resulted in the first Jewish Communist MP.
In 1979 when both a Communist and a National Front candidate stood in
Hackney North at the General Election, Professor Geoffrey Alderman could not
discern a single Jewish vote for the Communist but estimated that a few hundred
Jews voted for the holocaust denying National Front.
Zionism as a settler colonial and imperialist ideology is clearly
attractive to those on the right. Coupled with its sense of victimhood arising
out of the weaponisation of the holocaust, British Jews have been complicit in
enabling Starmer and Lammy to support Israel’s genocide. However it would be
wrong to ascribe the support of the British state to either the Zionist lobby
or British Jews. The latter are the State’s moral alibi. It is not why the
British state supports Israel.
Notwithstanding the above it is incumbent upon anti-Zionist Jews to give
their full support to Rahmeh in her battles with the Medical Establishment and
the Metropolitan Police. She is being attacked, not because of anti-Semitism
but because she is a supporter of the Palestinians.
These Are The Values Of Starmer
& Yvette Cooper – Palestine Action Are No More Terrorists Than Were The
French Resistance
Frank Magennis, Barrister at Garden Court Chambers, on Palestine Action
We are not walking but running into a Police State
as Starmer and Cooper have decided
to make War Crimes legal and opposition to them a criminal offence.
It is not unknown for imperialist countries to
define their opponents as ‘terrorists’. The British did that constantly in the British
Empire, The Nazis branded the French and Polish Resistance as bandits or
terrorists. Starmer and Yvette Cooper are following a well-worn path. As Lord
Carrington, a former Foreign Secretary noted, ‘one man’s freedom fighter is another man’s terrorist.’
The Zionists have been calling for months for Palestine
Action to be proscribed as ‘domestic terrorists’ and Luke Akehurst’s We Believe in Israel has been particularly
active in calling for a ban. Akehurst’s group has been give access to Police
and Intelligence information as the state seeks to clamp down on anything that
effectively challenges the Zionists and Palestine Action certainly does that.
The racist Commissioner of the Met Doesn't Even Pretend to Political Neutrality
Since being formed three years ago Palestine Action has
been responsible
for the shutting down
of three Elbit factories and the Israeli Embassy has attempted
to influence the decisions of the Crown Prosecution Service and the Attorney-General’s
office in relation to prosecutions.
James Schneider on BBC Question Time on Why Palestine Action
Should Not Be Proscribed
The
move is a further escalation of Starmer's war on opponents of genocide and journalists.
The government is actively colluding
with Israel to abuse
anti-terror laws, with potential prison sentences of up to fourteen years,
against those who speak out for Palestinian lives and human rights and against
Israel's mass slaughter of almost 400,000 innocent civilians.
In
essence opponents of the Government’s foreign policy of support for Israeli war
crimes are now being prosecuted as terrorists. Some PA activists such as the Filton 18have been held
in prison for more than a year before they even come to trial, as the
government tries to 'make the process the punishment.
movement. Peaceful direct action has been historically important in shaping the UK. Here is Yvette cooper recognising that by wearing the colours of those suffragettes.
The
comparisons between the Suffragettes, a cause that Starmer’s bitch Yvette
Cooper purports to support and Palestine Action are remarkable.
During
their trials, suffragettes—especially those affiliated with the more militant Women’s Social and Political Union (WSPU)—were
frequently treated harshly by British judges and authorities. While the language
varied, judges framed the suffragettes
as criminals, rather than legitimate political activists.
1.
Criminal, Not Political
Judges
and prosecutors consistently emphasized
that suffragette actions were criminal offences, not political protests.
Their acts—such as window smashing, arson, or disrupting government
meetings—were treated under criminal law, with no recognition of their
political motives.
A common
judicial attitude was: “You are not political prisoners; you are ordinary
criminals.”
2.
“Terrorist” Comparisons
While the
term "terrorist"
wasn’t widely used in the modern sense at the time, some authorities did
suggest that the WSPU’s militant
tactics resembled political violence or even domestic terrorism. Prime
Minister H.H. Asquith and others in government expressed concern that
suffragette acts (like bombing empty buildings or attacking artwork) were
dangerous and extreme.
·Media and political
opponents occasionally described the suffragettes as
hysterical, dangerous, or subversive—language that echoed contemporary fears of
anarchism or extremism.
3. Moral
Condemnation
Judges
often spoke to suffragettes with condescension
or scorn, labeling them as irrational, overly emotional, or misguided.
Women were frequently told that their actions were unfeminine or disgraceful.
Emmeline
Pankhurst, was told that she was “a woman
of great ability but misguided zeal,”. Mr Justice Phillimoreadded:
“Although your motives... are not the selfish
motives which actuate most persons… the crime… is in fact a wicked one… it might have exposed
other people to the danger of being maimed or even killed… whatever you may
think, it is a wicked one… The sentence must be a severe one… three years’
penal servitude.”
Mr
Justice Madden sentencing Mary Leigh after
the Theatre Royal arson attempt (Aug 8, 1912) said:
“These crimes will cease when
they get the vote… If they don’t get it, what are to be the consequences? Crime, crime
Madden
framed suffrage agitation as a path to lawlessness.
There is
an excellent
article in The Guardian by Sally Rooney and surprisingly, there was a brilliant
article by Andy Twelves in the Express of all papers.Which is much like the Morning Star praising
Margaret Thatcher. Wonders never cease.
Ordinary
people understand what Starmer and Cooper are doing, which is to attack the
most basic rights of protest against the criminality by our war criminal rulers.
We need
to build a strong civil rights movement that makes the proscription of Palestine
Action unenforceable. We need public declarations by thousands of people that
they support Palestine Action and its destruction of Elbit and the military
equipment that kills thousands of people and a demand that Keir Starmer be prosecuted
under the International
Criminal Court Act 2001 for aiding and supporting the commission of war
crimes by Israel.
If the
proscription goes ahead we need a petition supporting Palestine Action by thousands
of people and dare the filth and scum in government to prosecute us.
Things You Can Do
You can sign a petition
protesting the government’s action here.
You can sign a petition
calling for David
Lammy to resign
for
his complicity in war crimes and lying to the British public.
