While Starmer & Lammy Supply Weapons for Genocide in Gaza, I Am the One Being Prosecuted – In the Eyes of the Law Resisting Genocide is a Greater Crime Than Committing It

 On 12 January 2026 at Kingston Crown Court, Free Speech on Palestine Will Be on Trial

Jail UK Starmer & The Real Criminals! Rally At UK Consulate in San Francisco To Demand Hands Off Tony Greenstein

Platform Films Interview & Feature

Tony Greenstein’s first speech

At the Old Bailey on January 31 I appeared before Dame Parmjit Kaur "Bobbie" Cheema-Grubb, the first ever Asian High Court Judge. In the case before me she granted bail to a young man accused of sharing ISIS propaganda despite the Prosecution’s objection, albeit with very strict bail conditions. I guess she must count as some kind of liberal given that the Court of Appeal today under Lady Justice Sue Carr is an extremely reactionary court.

Dame Parmjit Kaur "Bobbie" Cheema-Grubb

Today’s Court of Appeal is perhaps the most reactionary since Lord Denning retired in 1982. Denning said of the Birmingham 6 and Guildford 4, all of whom were innocent and cleared, that

We shouldn’t have all these campaigns to get them released if they’d been hanged. They’d have been forgotten and the whole community would have been satisfied.... It is better that some innocent men remain in jail than that the integrity of the English judicial system be impugned.

Tony Greenstein's 2nd speech at his Old Bailey hearing on 31 January 2025

My barrister made the case for having the trial at the Old Bailey, because, having joint custody of an autistic son, I had good reasons for being in reach of Brighton easily. Lady Grubb however decided that judicial convenience should come before my needs.

I arrived at the court at 9 am to meet my legal team only to find they were not there. I went out again to what became a large demonstration outside. After going in again at 10.00 I came out around 11.30 to find that the demonstration had grown and I made a second, shorter speech explaining what had happened.

Chanting at on 31 January 2025 at the demonstration outside the Old Bailey 

There is a case management hearing on June 6 and a timetable for the serving of evidence, a defence and similar matters.

However none of this should obscure the politics behind the trial and the determination, first of the previous government and now this one to criminalise anyone sympathising with the Palestinian resistance.

I am charged with inviting support for a proscribed organisation, Hamas. It is an easily provable lie. I support the Palestinian resistance to Israel’s genocide and obviously that includes Hamas.

In 1982, UN General Assembly Resolution 37/43 affirmed the legitimacy of the struggle for independence and liberation from foreign domination and foreign occupation by all available means, including armed struggle. This resolution openly recognized the right to use force against foreign illegal occupation.

Chris Williamson on Tony Greenstein's prosecution

Article 1(4) of the Additional Protocol 1 to the Geneva Conventions (1977) classifies conflicts in which peoples are fighting against alien occupation and racist regimes as armed conflicts. Individuals engaging in such “fighting,” if captured, should be afforded the status of prisoners of war, meaning their fighting is legitimate.

For further elucidation see Do Palestinians have the right to resist, and what are the limits? by Ihsan Adel of Law for Palestine. But you don’t need to go to the law books to know that the right to resist an occupation of one’s territory is an inalienable right of any oppressed people. That Israel has been declared to be in an illegal occupation of Gaza by the International Court of Justice is sufficient in itself.

All nations have the right to resist occupation. Would anyone deny that the French, Poles and Czechs had the right to resist Nazi occupation during the war? The Nazis also termed their opponents ‘terrorists’. Even Starmer and his fool of a Foreign Secretary Lammy might understand that.

Why then is there any equivocation over the rights of the Palestinians to resist a military occupation. How is it that the Palestinians are terrorists whilst the Ukrainians are freedom fighters? There is but one explanation and that is imperialism and its racist twin. Racism is part of the DNA of the British state but that is no reason to accept it.

The description of Hamas as a ‘terrorist’ organisation is also racist. It demonises Palestinians in a way that isn’t applied to Europeans. It assumes that they have lesser rights than the French because they aren’t White. Israel has no right whatsoever to be occupying an inch of Palestinian land, including I would add 1948 Palestine.

The irony is that it was Israel that played a major part in bringing Hamas into existence because it saw them as a counterweight to secular Palestinian nationalism. See Blowback: How Israel Went From Helping Create Hamas to Bombing It, the Washington Post’s How Israel helped create Hamas and the Wall Street Journal’s How Israel Helped to Spawn Hamas. Those who call Hamas ‘terrorists’ indulge in the purest hypocrisy.

Israel was following the United States example. It birthed ISIS from al-Qaeda in Iraq as a means of dividing the Iraqi Resistance on ethnic lines.  The US also helped create Al Qaeda and the Taliban in order to fight the pro-Soviet regime in Afghanistan in the late 1980’s.

As Jonathan Cook so ably demonstrated in ‘Thirty years of Middle East lies just keep coming back to bite us’

The West’s 'war on terror' was built on a series of deceptions to persuade us that our leaders were crushing Islamist extremism. In truth, they were nourishing it’.

In the case of Hamas the justification for proscribing their political wing was not only paper thin but it is an incitement to genocide. Hamas is a political party as well as a guerrilla organisation. It has some 20,000 members who work in government, hospitals, schools etc. If its civilian members are classed as ‘terrorists’ then that is effectively justifying Israel’s bombing of those schools and hospitals. This is why Starmer, Biden and Scholtz are complicit in Israel’s genocide. They have laid the political basis for it.

The rationale, if one can call it that, for proscribing Hamas in 2019 was that:

Hamas IDQ was proscribed by the UK in March 2001. At the time it was HM government’s assessment that there was a sufficient distinction between the so called political and military wings of Hamas, such that they should be treated as different organisations, and that only the military wing was concerned in terrorism. The government now assess that the approach of distinguishing between the various parts of Hamas is artificial. Hamas is a complex but single terrorist organisation. [note that there is no explanation as to what this assessment consisted of – apart from increasing pressure from Zionist organisations to do so].

Hamas commits and participates in terrorism. Hamas has used indiscriminate rocket or mortar attacks, and raids against Israeli targets. During the May 2021 conflict, over 4,000 rockets were fired indiscriminately into Israel. Civilians, including 2 Israeli children, were killed as a result. [by this calculation the thousands of deadly Israeli missiles which have killed thousands of Palestinian children must make Israel a terrorist state a thousand times over].

Palestinian militant groups, including Hamas, frequently use incendiary balloons to launch attacks from Gaza into southern Israel. There was a spate of incendiary balloon attacks from Gaza during June and July 2021, causing fires in communities in southern Israel that resulted in serious damage to property. [so ‘serious damage to property’ is more important than a starvation siege on Gaza for 18 years, the deliberate shooting of unarmed civilians in the Great Return march etc? This ‘justification’ reeks of racist hypocrisy].

Hamas also prepares for acts of terrorism. One incident of preparatory activity is that Hamas recently launched summer camps in Gaza which focus on training groups, including minors, to fight. This is evidence of Hamas being responsible for running terrorist training camps in the region. In a press statement, Hamas described the aim of these camps as to “ignite the embers of Jihad in the liberation generation, cultivate Islamic values and prepare the expected victory army to liberate Palestine”. [Israel also has military training camps for its youth and don’t its fundamentalist messianic settlers cultivate genocidal values? 

Rabbi Dov Lior, the spiritual mentor of Kahanist Police Minister Ben Gvir proclaimed that

‘There is no such thing as enemy civilians in war time. The law of our Torah is to have mercy on our soldiers and to save them... A thousand non-Jewish lives are not worth a Jew's fingernail."?

Does this not qualify to classify Israel as a terrorist state?]

Racism and corruption lie behind Tory/Labour support for Israel’s  genocide. Hypocrisy runs like a red streak through the prosecution of Sarah Wilkinson, Natalie Strecker, Richard Medhurst and myself. It is based on a series of lies and half truths.

The irony is that if there is any group which I support in Gaza it is the leftist Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine not the Islamist Hamas. There is no reason why, as a Jewish atheist I should support an Islamic group. There are no articles on my blog which support Hamas politically, quite the contrary. But the CPS are bringing the prosecution in order to silence me and others not because we are ‘terrorist’ supporters. See for example:

We Support the Palestinian people of Gaza not Hamas 7.3.09.

PFLP Subject to Hamas Attacks 3.5.10.

Hamas - Speaking With a Forked Tongue  26.12.10.

Gaza Youth Demand Freedom 2.1.11.

The lousy Hamas government 15.2.11.

How Israel Created Hamas 31.12.11. 

Hamas Pays the Price of Forced ‘Islamicisation’ and acting as a Policeman of Social Morality 17.4.13.

HAMAS - When Israel & Netanyahu Sang from a Different Songsheet 3.8.14.

Strange that: Netanyahu says ISIS = Hamas - Is Netanyahu a liar or is Netanyahu a liar?

Abbas and Hamas Abuse and Torture of Palestinians is a Gift to the Israeli Government 25.10.18.

My case will be heard before a judge and jury. We will see whether, as is often the case, the judge will act as a second prosecutor and rule out our defences. This has been par for the course with Palestine Action and climate activists’ trials.

I have no doubt that the state will do its best to secure a guilty verdict by fair means or foul. I understand that the decision to prosecute in this case went up to the Attorney General’s office. The Attorney General Richard Hermer is a Zionist. His deputy, Sarah Sackman MP is Vice-Chair of the Jewish Labour Movement which spearheaded the ‘anti-Semitism’ smear campaign in the Labour Party under Corbyn. This is the corruption of government and our legal system.

Tony Greenstein

See Democracy doesn’t exist in the United States: Chris Hedges

Last Thursday I was Charged With Exercising My Right to Freedom of Speech & Remanded to the Old Bailey for Supporting the Palestinian Resistance

In Starmer’s Brave New World It is a Crime to Hold or Express Opinions that Oppose Genocide or War Crimes – War really is Peace

Tony Greenstein speech outside Westminster magistrates court

Last Thursday 19^th December 2024 I was formally charged with inviting support for a proscribed organisation and expressing an opinion or belief that was ‘supportive’ of them.

Needless to say I have done neither and I pled not guilty to offences carrying a 14 year prison sentence. As I explained to the 100 or so demonstrators outside, in a wonderful expression of solidarity, if I had downloaded hard core child pornography and my name was Hugh Edwards, I could expect a 6 months suspended sentence.

My real ‘offence’ was opposing Israel’s 57 year old occupation of Gaza and its ethnic cleansing of Gaza. If the proscription of anti-colonial resistance groups had been in place 40 years ago then I could have been charged with supporting another ‘terrorist’ organisation – the ANC.  Because that is what Thatcher and Reagan called the ANC.

Thatcher told a press conference at the Commonwealth summit in Vancouver, in 1987:

A considerable number of the ANC leaders are Communists… When the ANC says that they will target British companies, this shows what a typical terrorist organisation it is. I fought terrorism all my life… I will have nothing to do with any organisation that practises violence. I have never seen anyone from ANC or the PLO or the IRA and would not do so.

Presumably Thatcher kept her distance from the British army too! This is the hypocrisy that labels Hamas, Hezbollah and the PKK as ‘terrorist’. The massively greater violence of the Israeli and Turkish states simply does not exist for creatures like Thatcher or Starmer. State violence is fine, but violence against the state is ‘terrorism’ unless, as with Assad and Gaddafi, we oppose the state too.

Tony Greenstein speech outside Westminster magistrates court

Using the same ‘logic’ Thatcher should have condemned violence by the Yugoslav resistance under Tito against the Nazi occupation. Because the Special Operations Executive, which became the SAS, was aiding them, she would have made an exception for them. This demonstrates that those who define resistance organisations as ‘terrorist’ don’t have a single principle between them.

Outside Tony Greenstein's court hearing, end segment

If I’d been alive 80 years ago according to the same logic people could have been charged with supporting the French and Polish Resistance. The Nazis certainly called them ‘terrorists’.

The system of proscribing organisations in force today enables any support for any national liberation or resistance organisation to be classified as ‘terrorist’ thus making support for people seeking to overthrow colonialism or imperialism a criminal offence.

International law supports the right of resistance of those opposing colonialism and this includes the Palestinians but British law deems this irrelevant. Except in the case of Ukraine of course!

Tony Greenstein speech outside Westminster magistrates court

Suffice to say those who profess their support for freedom of speech also seek to outlaw anything that strays outside the overton window of what is and is not allowed to be discussed. It is a window that has been closing for the past half century.

Freedom of speech has limits and those limits are not confined to incitement to racial hatred or violence against another person but to support of organisations that the Establishment deem to be ‘extreme’ i.e. anti-colonial or anti-capitalist.

‘Extremism’ is the new buzzword. When I was remanded in custody I was asked at reception whether or not I was an extremist! When I asked the young Black woman if she knew what an extremist was she confessed she didn’t. I then explained that all those who fought for the freedoms we take for granted (and which we are losing) like the Suffragettes, were also called extremists in their time. The Jewish Chronicle then said that I compared myself to the Suffragettes!

It is no surprise that Attorney General Richard Hermer and his Zionist side-kick Sarah Sackman from the Jewish Labour Movement want to criminalise those who oppose British imperialism. They have lost the battle to tar us with the ‘anti-Semitism’ brush and have therefore sought the help of the Police to keep us silent.

Live: Outside Tony Greenstein's court hearing

It is untrue that I support Hamas as a political organisation. What I do is to recognise that it was elected by the Palestinians in 2006 in preference to Fateh. Instead of respecting the outcome of the elections, the Israeli state together with the US and Britain supported a coup attempt by Palestinian Quisling Mahmoud Abbas to overthrow the elected government of the Palestinians.

There are terrorist organisations such as ISIS and Al Qaeda, both of which are the creations of US imperialism. We see today how Al Qaeda offshoot Hay’at Tahrir al-Sham (HTS) which was proscribed in May 2017 has quickly been taken to the bosom of the imperialists. At the time the justification for their proscription was that they:

 ‘should be treated as alternative names for the organisation which is already proscribed under the name Al Qa’ida.’

All sorts of people like MI6 former chief Sir John Sawers have called for the UK to deproscribe HTS. Sawers argued that the organisation has changed significantly in the last several years.

Sawers told Sky News that Jolani, the head of HTS "has made great efforts over the last 10 years to distance himself from those terrorist groups.

"Certainly, the actions we've seen of Tahrir al-Sham over the last two weeks have been those of a liberation movement, not of a terrorist organisation,"

"It would be rather ridiculous, actually, if we're unable to engage with the new leadership in Syria because of a proscription dating back 12 years."

For once the Telegraph got it right when Nina Shea wrote

That commander Al-Jolani has now changed into a Western suit and talks of moderation, they undoubtedly see, is purely tactical. When before has a holy warrior, at the very moment of triumph, pulled down his keffiyeh to reveal underneath a champion of religious pluralism and freedom? These militants are no more credible than the Taliban, who promised to respect women’s rights but who, three years after taking control of Afghanistan, have “erased” women from public life, as the UN reports.

Sawyer’s statements seem very supportive of an organisation that is still proscribed yet the anti-terrorist police have not conducted a dawn raid on his home in the early hours of the morning because he is in breach of s.12(1A) of the Terrorism Act. Clearly the Police are making political decisions as to who is breaching the said Act.

If Sawers had said the same about a proscribed Palestinian organisation his feet wouldn’t have touched the floor before he was arrested by the Thought Police.

Proscription has nothing to do with terrorism. It is about preventing people supporting organisations that are fighting for the rights of their own people against regimes imposed by the West.

Terrorism contrary to the definition in the Terrorism Act 2000 has nothing to do with ‘serious damage against property’, ‘serious violence against a person’, the disruption of electronic systems or health and safety. All of the above are covered by other legislation.

Terrorism is the deliberate infliction of violence and terror on civilian populations. ISIS, with its attempted genocide of the Yazidis clearly fits into this as does Al Qaeda. ISIS violence in Paris, the Bataclan attack and the London Bridge knife attacks or the Manchester Arena bombing of Ariana Grande’s concert were for the sake of spreading terror without any discernible political motive.

It is usually because an organisation lacks a mass base that they resort to terrorism. Hamas (& Hezbollah) have both been elected and carry large popular support. Hezbollah’s attacks on Israel in support of Gaza was carefully calibrated and unlike Israel’s response did not target civilians but military infrastructure primarily.

The worst terrorist attack in Britain, the bombing of Ariana Grande’s concert in the Manchester Arena in May 2017 came about because of the collusion of MI5 with the bomber, Salman Abedi, who had been sent to Libya to fight in jihadist organisations trying to overthrow Col. Gaddafi.

The head of MI5 said he was "profoundly sorry" the security service did not prevent the Manchester Arena attack but not so sorry that he was prepared to reveal the truth about the bomber’s links with MI5.

An article Manchester Arena bombing inquiry delivers cover-up “in the national interest” on the World Socialist Web Site explains:

The final report by Sir John Saunders from the inquiry he led into the Manchester Arena terrorist bombing is a state cover-up. It conceals the role of MI5, MI6, the Ministry of Defence and successive British governments in the grooming and protection of far-right Islamists who were deployed to achieve imperialist foreign policy objectives in Libya and throughout the Middle East.

The 22-year-old Salman Abedi worked with Islamist fighters who were trained, armed, and financed by the British state and NATO to topple Libyan leader Muammar and install a puppet regime.

Abedi had been sent to fight in Libya with Jihadi groups by MI5 as part of a plot to overthrow Muammar Gaddafi. British imperialism aligned itself with the very forces that they would later classify as terrorist. Again there was blowback and 22 people died as a result.

In order to ensure that the cover-up succeeded the families of the victims were prevent from suing MI5. Suffice to say the ever loyal Guardian went along with the cover up blaming it on Abedi’s ‘radicalisation’ - How Manchester bomber Salman Abedi was radicalised by his links to Libya without even a mention of MI5!

The duplicity and dishonesty of our war criminal leaders and the press means that Terrorism legislation is being deployed to suppress political debate and discussion not terrorism.

The next stage in my trial will be the Old Bailey on Friday 31 January at 10.00 am and there will be a demonstration outside the court because my prosecution is aimed at the Palestine solidarity movement as a whole, not just me as an individual.

The turnout last Thursday was impressive but it could have been better still. London PSC groups were not in evidence unlike groups such as Jewish Voice for Labour, Jewish Network for Palestine and the Jewish Anti-Zionist Network. It is about time that PSC took the attacks on the solidarity movement seriously.

It is not enough to issue a statement condemning the repression of Palestine Action and then do nothing further. A statement on its own is useless. PSC has to realise that the British state is attacking the Palestine solidarity movement and that means it must defend those who are targeted by them. The problem with PSC is that it has no anti-Zionist or anti-imperialist politics. It has become just another NGO.

The attacks by the Police on the Palestine solidarity movement are only part of the picture. The Met have also been acting on behalf Recep Erdogan and Turkey’s genocidal repression of the Kurds. The PKK, which is fighting the Turkish army has a mass base amongst the Kurds. It is anything but a terrorist group.

Through proscription the British state is clamping down on support for the PKK in Britain. This has nothing to do with terrorism. Palestine solidarity and Kurdish supporters have to start working together.

Finally please also contribute to my Crowdfunder:  It is not just for me but for activists caught up in the ‘terrorist’ trap.

Stopping the Police Persecuting Palestine Solidarity Activists

Tony Greenstein