Showing posts with label Natalie Strecker. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Natalie Strecker. Show all posts

2 September 2025

Webinar - Fighting Back Against Starmer’s Police State

We live in a Dystopia where Opposing Genocide & Attacking Arms Factories is a Crime Whereas Profiting from the Death of Children is Lawful


Stop Starmer's Police State Webinar 30 August 2025

Last Saturday over 200 people attended our WebinarStopping Starmer’s Police State – Defending the Right to Protest’ to listen to six different speakers, three of whom have been arrested under the Terrorism Acts, one of whom is the mother of a daughter, Fatimah, who is in custody, Huda Ammori the co-founder of Palestine Action and Franck Magennis, a barrister at Garden Court Chambers who is presently one of the lawyers involved in seeking the deproscription of Hamas.

It says something about the nature of the Tory Party and its far-right leader, Kemi Bad Enoch (presumably her mother had forewarning of how she would turn out when she was named!) that its Justice Secretary Robert Jenrick, someone who is more comfortable in the company of neo-Nazis and asylum protesters, has branded as ‘sickening’ the bid to deproscribe Hamas.

Natalie Strecker’s pre-recorded speech

Unfortunately Natalie Strecker, who has been charged with a terrorist offence in Jersey, under laws similar but not identical to our own, did not feel able to attend and speak in person. She did however kindly agree to send us a video with her message and it is shown above

Filton 24 supporters stage demo outside prison holding activistsc / London

The first speaker was Sukaina Rajwani, whose daughter Fatema Zainab is one of the Filton 24, who have been incarcerated for a year now and can expect to stay in prison for another year before even facing a trial. This is completely outrageous. They are charged with non-terrorist offences yet they are being kept in appalling conditions in prison as if they were terrorists.

Teuta Hoxha has been held in prison without trial for the last nine months, and has been on hunger strike since 11 August as a protest against the denial of her basic rights. She says that she and her Palestine Action co-defendants are being monitored by the Counter Extremism Unit. See Filton 24 hunger striker tells the Canary government is monitoring her under counter extremism

It is a sad, sick comment on Starmer and Cooper’s Britain that young women and men who are trying to stop a genocide are treated like the worst criminals whilst arms manufacturers, who profit from the bodies of babies torn to shredd are feted, wined and dined.

One person who should be in gaol is Lord Dannat, a former head of the British army and a member of the House of Lords. He urged ministers to crack down on Palestine Action at the request of the US defence company Teledyne that employs him as an adviser.

Despite his claims of non-interference, police transcripts in a trial disclosed internal objections to his involvement, although a judge ultimately ruled that he had not interfered in the active investigation.

The revelation arrives amid existing scandals: Dannatt was already under two separate investigations. One from the House of Lords watchdog concerning a covert video of him offering access to ministers for commercial clients, and another into lobbying on behalf of CF Industries to save a fertilizer plant – where he received honoraria and leveraged his peerage for legitimacy. See Lord Dannatt urged ministers to crack down on Palestine Action at request of US firm and Scandal-hit Lord Dannatt now caught lobbying for arms industry against Palestine Action

Next up to speak was Mick Napier, Chair of Scottish PSC who has spent most of his active life being arrested. It is ironic that despite Scotland being ruled for most of that time by the Scottish National Party, the SNP has given next to no support to the Palestinians who are also fighting for their freedom from an alien occupation. Indeed the record of the Scottish Police is as bad as those in England. See SACC Statement on the Arrest of Mick Napier.

The next speaker was Richard Medhurst, a journalist who was arrested by the counter-terror police at Heathrow Airport and accused of ‘expressing an opinion or belief that is supportive of a terrorist organisation’. He was detained for 24 hours, his electronic devices seized and he has been waiting for over a year to see if he is going to be charged. See his account here.

Huda Ammori, the co-founder of Palestine Action was the next to speak and as always she gave a barnstorming speech outlining the growth of the campaign against Palestine Action’s proscription.

Next up was Franck Magennis, a prominent Irish and socialist barrister from Garden Court Chambers. Franck is involved in the attempt to secure de-proscription of Hamas. He has been targeted by the Israeli government front group the so-called Campaign Against Antisemitism for having told the racist Chief Rabbi Mirvis to shut his racist, Zionist mouth!

The CAA have submitted not one but two complaints against Franck.  Presumably on the basis that if one doesn’t succeed the other might! Among the things they objected to was the statement that:

“Zionism is collapsing. Keep hammering anyone who still identifies as a Zionist. Their apartheid state is a pariah. It’s on its way out, just like South Africa, like Jim Crow, like the French in Algeria. Escalate!!”

Most people would agree that this is a good example of the exercise of free speech but given that the CAA is an Israeli front group it’s not surprising that they believe that British standards of free speech should mirror those of Israel – where pro-Palestine speech normally results in arrest and a beating.

I was the last speaker and I will leave you to watch to find out what I said! Apart from, that is, taking Palestine Solidarity Campaign and Ben Jamal to task for having done nothing to support the campaign to destroy the proscription of Palestine Action. PSC still labourd under the illusion that they can, by staging demonstrations in London that no one reports and writing protest letters to MPs that no one reads, win over the British Establishment to the Palestinian cause. Softly, softly and mainstreaming is what they call a strategy.

After all the speakers had spoken there was a Q&A session. The meeting was co-chaired by Esther Giles of the Socialist Labour Network and Haim Bresheeth of Jewish Network for Palestine.

The meeting itself was sponsored by the JNP, Jewish Voice for Labour, the SLN and Scottish PSC.

Tony Greenstein

11 June 2025

ALL OUT ON JUNE 19 - At 10.30 am 19 June at Kingston Crown Court, I will have a pre-trial hearing accused of ‘terrorism’

 My Alleged Crime is Support for a Proscribed Organisation, Hamas But Supporters of Syria’s HTS/ISIS/Al Qaeda Regime Have not Been Prosecuted


Tony Greenstein Speech At the Birmingham Palestine Solidarity March Sunday June 1st

Please Donate to the Crowdfunder

https://www.chuffed.org/project/114730-stopping-the-police-persecuting-palestine-solidarity-activists

The charge sheet is deceptive.  I am charged with

‘Express(ing) an opinion or belief in support of (a) proscribed organisation that will encourage support of it (and that) on 7th October 2023 expressed an opinion or be1ief that was supportive of a proscribed organisation, namely Hamas, and the support is not, or is not restricted to, to the provision of money or other property.

This charge is a lie. The Crown Prosecution Service had to obtain the consent of the Attorney General to prosecute, but that wasn't difficult.

Attorney General, Richard Hermer,  although critical of Israel’s Occupation of the West Bank and its contempt for international law, is a liberal Zionist.

In a statement to the Jewish Chronicle he explained that:

As it happens, I am from a “Blue-Box” Jewish family, a former Jewish youth movement chanich/madrich (a movement that my kids are now actively involved in), a graduate of the Machon, a former active member of UJS, a former volunteer for Searchlight magazine and a current member of Alyth Gardens shul.  I actively support a range of Jewish and Israeli organisations.  

I have dear family members currently serving in the IDF.  I also happen to believe... that the continued Israeli occupation of the West Bank is unlawful, deeply damaging to the interests of Israel and wholly contrary to the values of tikkun olam that I grew up with and continue to guide me.

Hermer’s opposition to the occupation of the West Bank does not derive from the damage to the Palestinians (who he doesn’t mention) but the interest of Israel.

 Hermer was also a sabbatical officer for the Israeli Embassy funded, ardently pro-Zionist Union of Jewish Students.

The Solicitor General, Sarah Sackman is also the Deputy Attorney General. She is no liberal Zionist. She was the Vice-Chair of Labour Friends of Genocide aka the Jewish Labour Movement, which has mobilised support for continued arms sales to Israel. The JLM was behind the false anti-Semitism smear campaign which helped destroy Corbyn’s leadership of the Labour Party.

My lawyers have, quite ludicrously, not been allowed to give me copies of the material in which I am alleged to have offered support to Hamas, even though I wrote it.

Sarah Sackman as part of the JLM Zoom Meeting with Kid Starver


 

It is clear to anyone who isn’t blind that the charges against Sarah Wilkinson, Richard Medhurst, Natalie Strecker, the Filton 18 and myself have nothing to do with terrorism and everything to do with attacking Palestine solidarity activists.

The One Paper You Wouldn't Expect to Turn It Into a Free Speech Issue is the Conservative Jersey Evening Post

If the Police seriously believed that we were engaged in the commission of acts of terrorism they would charged us with commissioning acts of terrorism. They haven’t.  The charges against us are about expressing opinions or beliefs that they don’t like.



Alistair Campbell &  Rory Stewart Interview the Head of the Proscribed Organisation HTS, Ahmed al-Sharaa

However there are some supporters of proscribed organisations who aren’t prosecuted. Step forward Alistair Campbell, who wrote the ‘dodgy dossier’ which was a crucial document in fixing the evidence for going to war in Iraq in 2003 and ex-Tory MP Rory Stewart who interviewed the Al Quaeda/ISIS President of Syria, Mohammed al-Jolani, as part of the Establishment’s quest to rehabilitate someone who is presiding over the slaughter of Druze, Alawites & Christians. 

For the first and last time I agree with the former Jewish Chronicle Editor, Jake Wallis Simons when he says ‘Shame on Rory Stewart and Alistair Cambell’.

Kingston Crown Court

Whenever the word ‘terrorism’ is mentioned the Judiciary go weak at the knees. I wanted the trial to be held in Brighton or Lewes Crown Court which are near where I live, since I have a responsibility under a Court of Protection Order for an autistic son. However because this is a ‘terrorism’ trial there are only 3 courts in the South-East that can hear it – the Old Bailey, Woolwich and Kingston Crown Court.

‘Terrorism’ legislation is being used, not to combat genuine terrorism but as a blunt weapon to silence supporters of the Palestinians and opponents of genocide. It is an abuse of the law which our judges are happy to endorse.

As John Dugard, a Professor of International law and an ad-hoc judge of the International Court of Justice observed,

‘‘The label of ‘terrorist’ is ‘a bid to discredit and silence opponents”. 

In the 1980s Thatcher and Reagan called the ANC a terrorist organisation and Nelson Mandela remained on the United States terrorist watch list until 2008. 

Gaza is a post-apocalyptic killing zone: UNRWA chief - Philippe Lazzarini

The accusation of ‘terrorism’ is being used to close down free speech on Palestine and Hamas is the pretext. Previously it was the PLO which was demonised. If proscription had been in operation 50 or 60 years ago then support for any national liberation or anti-colonial movement, from the Vietcong to the ANC, would have been a criminal offence.

What has been done, with the willing complicity and support of Starmer, Hermer and Lammy is to criminalise political opposition to the British government’s support of genocide.

Hamas is not a terrorist but a resistance group. It hasn’t blindly killed thousands of babies and children and then tried to turn October 7 into a second holocaust by engaging in the propogation of atrocity propaganda such as the story of 40 Beheaded Babies.

You might expect the ‘free press’ to take up this abuse of the anti-terrorist laws but instead they are its main cheerleaders. As George Orwell remarked in an essay The Freedom of the Press

The British press is extremely centralised, and most of it is owned by wealthy men who have every motive to be dishonest on certain important topics.

Except today the British press is dishonest on virtually every topic that impinges on the interests of their billionaire owners.  Included in that dishonesty is the broadcast media – not merely GB News and LBC but the BBC and Sky News.

In the United States we are seeing the destruction of even the most basic forms of democratic rights as Donald Trump sets loose the Marines and National Guard at those protesting at the activities of the ICE immigration squads.

It may not be as bad here but when you have a dozen police knocking at your door at 7 a.m. in the morning over a tweet which I posted a month before, you realise that the police state is not far away. When the police officer in my case, Chris Beckford, was asked to explain why he needed to keep possession of my digital devices, he stated when there was copious amounts of evidence in the public domain already:

However, that evidence only shows what Mr Greenstein presents publically. It is important to the investigation that we fully understand Mr Greenstein’s mind set and ideology. This not only comes from public sources, ie his blog and social media, but from his internet search history and communication with others. How, and indeed if, he talks about Hamas with others away from the public domain provides highly relevant insight into Mr Greenstein.

This is the language of the thought police who want to get into your mind. PC Beckford was not an ogre, quite the contrary. A quite affable guy but his mentality was that of Orwell’s 1984. The desire to get inside your mind is the stuff of which nightmares are made.

What is the prosecution based on?  Two things. Firstly a tweet on 15 November 2023 and secondly my blog of October 7 Full Support for the Gaza Ghetto Uprising.

In my blog I say virtually nothing about Hamas but I make it clear that I support the Uprising and that is the real reason for my prosecution. Support for the oppressed and colonial peoples is now a crime.

We cannot expect the British press to support free speech because it is in bed with the political class.



The reporting of my case in the Brighton Argus ‘Brighton man charged with terror offences over Hamas comments’ was par for the course in a paper which, under its present Editor Aaron Hendy, has gone from bad to oblivion.

Contrast the even more abysmal Jo Wadsworth, Editor of Brighton & Hove News whose innovative headline was ‘Tony Greenstein charged with terror offences’.

Wadsworth, who is to journalism what Harold Shipman was to care for the elderly. She once threatened to report me to the Police after I accused her of wallowing in the blood of Palestinian children. These people can get very precious.


The Police in this country have prioritised the defence of War Criminal Arms Factories like Elbit even whilst ‘ordinary’ crime like rape and burglary has soared. Rape has effectively been decriminalised as conviction rates have fallen to 1%.

There are a number of reasons for this. It isn’t just the attitudes of the Police but also the fact that the Police  prefer to spend their time harassing Palestine protests and activists to doing the boring work of tracking down rapists and violent criminals. Its so much more enjoyable persecuting political opponents than doing the hard work tackling rape. 

Many police officers don’t even accept that there is such a crime as rape. The murderer of Sarah Everard, Wayne Couzens was known by the nickname of ‘the rapist’.  Apparently this was considered to be quite a joke.

Please come and support me on June 19th because it’s not me who is on trial but the right to freedom of speech and the right to support the Palestinians. See also

How to fight illegal police raids and win, with Asa Winstanley

Illegal police raid on my home won’t stop me covering Gaza – Asa Winstanley

1 February 2025

While Starmer & Lammy Supply Weapons for Genocide in Gaza, I Am the One Being Prosecuted – In the Eyes of the Law Resisting Genocide is a Greater Crime Than Committing It

 On 12 January 2026 at Kingston Crown Court, Free Speech on Palestine Will Be on Trial

Platform Films Interview & Feature


Tony Greenstein’s first speech

At the Old Bailey on January 31 I appeared before Dame Parmjit Kaur "Bobbie" Cheema-Grubb, the first ever Asian High Court Judge. In the case before me she granted bail to a young man accused of sharing ISIS propaganda despite the Prosecution’s objection, albeit with very strict bail conditions. I guess she must count as some kind of liberal given that the Court of Appeal today under Lady Justice Sue Carr is an extremely reactionary court.

Dame Parmjit Kaur "Bobbie" Cheema-Grubb

Today’s Court of Appeal is perhaps the most reactionary since Lord Denning retired in 1982. Denning said of the Birmingham 6 and Guildford 4, all of whom were innocent and cleared, that

We shouldn’t have all these campaigns to get them released if they’d been hanged. They’d have been forgotten and the whole community would have been satisfied.... It is better that some innocent men remain in jail than that the integrity of the English judicial system be impugned.

Tony Greenstein's 2nd speech at his Old Bailey hearing on 31 January 2025

My barrister made the case for having the trial at the Old Bailey, because, having joint custody of an autistic son, I had good reasons for being in reach of Brighton easily. Lady Grubb however decided that judicial convenience should come before my needs.

I arrived at the court at 9 am to meet my legal team only to find they were not there. I went out again to what became a large demonstration outside. After going in again at 10.00 I came out around 11.30 to find that the demonstration had grown and I made a second, shorter speech explaining what had happened.

Chanting at on 31 January 2025 at the demonstration outside the Old Bailey 

There is a case management hearing on June 6 and a timetable for the serving of evidence, a defence and similar matters.

However none of this should obscure the politics behind the trial and the determination, first of the previous government and now this one to criminalise anyone sympathising with the Palestinian resistance.

I am charged with inviting support for a proscribed organisation, Hamas. It is an easily provable lie. I support the Palestinian resistance to Israel’s genocide and obviously that includes Hamas.

In 1982, UN General Assembly Resolution 37/43 affirmed the legitimacy of the struggle for independence and liberation from foreign domination and foreign occupation by all available means, including armed struggle. This resolution openly recognized the right to use force against foreign illegal occupation.

Chris Williamson on Tony Greenstein's prosecution

Article 1(4) of the Additional Protocol 1 to the Geneva Conventions (1977) classifies conflicts in which peoples are fighting against alien occupation and racist regimes as armed conflicts. Individuals engaging in such “fighting,” if captured, should be afforded the status of prisoners of war, meaning their fighting is legitimate.


For further elucidation see Do Palestinians have the right to resist, and what are the limits? by Ihsan Adel of Law for Palestine. But you don’t need to go to the law books to know that the right to resist an occupation of one’s territory is an inalienable right of any oppressed people. That Israel has been declared to be in an illegal occupation of Gaza by the International Court of Justice is sufficient in itself.

All nations have the right to resist occupation. Would anyone deny that the French, Poles and Czechs had the right to resist Nazi occupation during the war? The Nazis also termed their opponents ‘terrorists’. Even Starmer and his fool of a Foreign Secretary Lammy might understand that.

Why then is there any equivocation over the rights of the Palestinians to resist a military occupation. How is it that the Palestinians are terrorists whilst the Ukrainians are freedom fighters? There is but one explanation and that is imperialism and its racist twin. Racism is part of the DNA of the British state but that is no reason to accept it.

The description of Hamas as a ‘terrorist’ organisation is also racist. It demonises Palestinians in a way that isn’t applied to Europeans. It assumes that they have lesser rights than the French because they aren’t White. Israel has no right whatsoever to be occupying an inch of Palestinian land, including I would add 1948 Palestine.

The irony is that it was Israel that played a major part in bringing Hamas into existence because it saw them as a counterweight to secular Palestinian nationalism. See Blowback: How Israel Went From Helping Create Hamas to Bombing It, the Washington Post’s How Israel helped create Hamas and the Wall Street Journal’s How Israel Helped to Spawn Hamas. Those who call Hamas ‘terrorists’ indulge in the purest hypocrisy.

Israel was following the United States example. It birthed ISIS from al-Qaeda in Iraq as a means of dividing the Iraqi Resistance on ethnic lines.  The US also helped create Al Qaeda and the Taliban in order to fight the pro-Soviet regime in Afghanistan in the late 1980’s.

As Jonathan Cook so ably demonstrated in ‘Thirty years of Middle East lies just keep coming back to bite us

The West’s 'war on terror' was built on a series of deceptions to persuade us that our leaders were crushing Islamist extremism. In truth, they were nourishing it’.

In the case of Hamas the justification for proscribing their political wing was not only paper thin but it is an incitement to genocide. Hamas is a political party as well as a guerrilla organisation. It has some 20,000 members who work in government, hospitals, schools etc. If its civilian members are classed as ‘terrorists’ then that is effectively justifying Israel’s bombing of those schools and hospitals. This is why Starmer, Biden and Scholtz are complicit in Israel’s genocide. They have laid the political basis for it.

The rationale, if one can call it that, for proscribing Hamas in 2019 was that:

Hamas IDQ was proscribed by the UK in March 2001. At the time it was HM government’s assessment that there was a sufficient distinction between the so called political and military wings of Hamas, such that they should be treated as different organisations, and that only the military wing was concerned in terrorism. The government now assess that the approach of distinguishing between the various parts of Hamas is artificial. Hamas is a complex but single terrorist organisation. [note that there is no explanation as to what this assessment consisted of – apart from increasing pressure from Zionist organisations to do so].

Hamas commits and participates in terrorism. Hamas has used indiscriminate rocket or mortar attacks, and raids against Israeli targets. During the May 2021 conflict, over 4,000 rockets were fired indiscriminately into Israel. Civilians, including 2 Israeli children, were killed as a result. [by this calculation the thousands of deadly Israeli missiles which have killed thousands of Palestinian children must make Israel a terrorist state a thousand times over].

Palestinian militant groups, including Hamas, frequently use incendiary balloons to launch attacks from Gaza into southern Israel. There was a spate of incendiary balloon attacks from Gaza during June and July 2021, causing fires in communities in southern Israel that resulted in serious damage to property. [so ‘serious damage to property’ is more important than a starvation siege on Gaza for 18 years, the deliberate shooting of unarmed civilians in the Great Return march etc? This ‘justification’ reeks of racist hypocrisy].

Hamas also prepares for acts of terrorism. One incident of preparatory activity is that Hamas recently launched summer camps in Gaza which focus on training groups, including minors, to fight. This is evidence of Hamas being responsible for running terrorist training camps in the region. In a press statement, Hamas described the aim of these camps as to “ignite the embers of Jihad in the liberation generation, cultivate Islamic values and prepare the expected victory army to liberate Palestine”. [Israel also has military training camps for its youth and don’t its fundamentalist messianic settlers cultivate genocidal values? 

Rabbi Dov Lior, the spiritual mentor of Kahanist Police Minister Ben Gvir proclaimed that

There is no such thing as enemy civilians in war time. The law of our Torah is to have mercy on our soldiers and to save them... A thousand non-Jewish lives are not worth a Jew's fingernail."?

Does this not qualify to classify Israel as a terrorist state?]

Racism and corruption lie behind Tory/Labour support for Israel’s  genocide. Hypocrisy runs like a red streak through the prosecution of Sarah Wilkinson, Natalie Strecker, Richard Medhurst and myself. It is based on a series of lies and half truths.

The irony is that if there is any group which I support in Gaza it is the leftist Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine not the Islamist Hamas. There is no reason why, as a Jewish atheist I should support an Islamic group. There are no articles on my blog which support Hamas politically, quite the contrary. But the CPS are bringing the prosecution in order to silence me and others not because we are ‘terrorist’ supporters. See for example:

We Support the Palestinian people of Gaza not Hamas 7.3.09.

PFLP Subject to Hamas Attacks 3.5.10.

Hamas - Speaking With a Forked Tongue  26.12.10.

Gaza Youth Demand Freedom 2.1.11.

The lousy Hamas government 15.2.11.

How Israel Created Hamas 31.12.11. 

Hamas Pays the Price of Forced ‘Islamicisation’ and acting as a Policeman of Social Morality 17.4.13.

HAMAS - When Israel & Netanyahu Sang from a Different Songsheet 3.8.14.

Strange that: Netanyahu says ISIS = Hamas - Is Netanyahu a liar or is Netanyahu a liar?

Abbas and Hamas Abuse and Torture of Palestinians is a Gift to the Israeli Government 25.10.18.

My case will be heard before a judge and jury. We will see whether, as is often the case, the judge will act as a second prosecutor and rule out our defences. This has been par for the course with Palestine Action and climate activists’ trials.

I have no doubt that the state will do its best to secure a guilty verdict by fair means or foul. I understand that the decision to prosecute in this case went up to the Attorney General’s office. The Attorney General Richard Hermer is a Zionist. His deputy, Sarah Sackman MP is Vice-Chair of the Jewish Labour Movement which spearheaded the ‘anti-Semitism’ smear campaign in the Labour Party under Corbyn. This is the corruption of government and our legal system.

Tony Greenstein

See Democracy doesn’t exist in the United States: Chris Hedges