Showing posts with label Viner. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Viner. Show all posts

8 December 2023

The Guardian/Observer Opposes a Ceasefire in Gaza Using the Holocaust as an Excuse for Genocide - Never Again’ Has Become a License to Massacre and Ethnically Cleanse

According to Howard Jacobson’s Twisted Logic It is Anti-Semitic To Accuse Israel Of Genocide Since It’s a Jewish State!


Stage Time is Stage Time – Speech from Jewish Comedian Matt Lieb at anti-war protest Los Angeles

On 2 March 1988 Yehuda Elkana, the former President and Rector of the Central European University in Budapest and a child survivor of Auschwitz, wrote an article, The Need to Forget. In it he argued that what had happened in Germany could happen anywhere, and to any people, describing how the ‘majority of Israelis are consumed by a profound hatred of the Arabs’. Elkana talked of:

a profound existential Angst fed by a particular interpretation of the lessons of the holocaust … that we are the eternal victim. In this ancient belief… I see the tragic and paradoxical victory of Hitler. Two nations, metaphorically speaking, emerged from the ashes of Auschwitz: a minority who assert, this must never happen again, and a frightened and haunted majority who assert, this must never happen to us again.

If there is one lesson we can draw from the Holocaust it is that any people, given the right set of circumstances, are capable of genocide and extermination. Jews are not exempt from this as Israel is proving today.

Last Sunday the Observer ran an article by Zionist novelist Howard Jacobson whose argument was that to accuse Israel of committing genocide in Gaza was either to deny the Holocaust or to accuse Jews of being

perpetrators of the very crime that killed them in their millions, as a consequence of which that crime is abrogated.



Are Cambodians, Armenians, Rwandan Tsutsis or Afro-Caribbeans also immune from becoming perpetrators of genocide? Does past victimhood prevent people from becoming a perpetrator of genocide?

Are some people biologically and racially programmed by past victimhood from becoming genocidaires? Common sense tells us that this is absurd. Genocide is the product of society not some genetical inheritance yet the Observer had no qualms in printing this rubbish in its determination to justify Israel’s ongoing genocide in Gaza.

Jacobson and the ‘liberal’ Observer were giving Israel a licence to massacre in the name of the 6 million Jews who died and to question that right is to be guilty of a sophisticated version of holocaust denial.

Implicit in everything Jacobson wrote was the idea that Israel was the collective Jew. That Israel spoke for all Jews, everywhere, including dead Jews. No one gave Israel that right, least of all those who died in Hitler’s gas chamber, most of whom detested the idea of a ‘Jewish’ state founded on the same racial principles as those of their persecutors.

To accuse Jacobson and those who employ his mediocre talents of being tone deaf would be to do him a disservice. He is blind to all reasoned argument. His only talent is as a scriptwriter for Israel’s racist barbarians.

Malcolm X on Palestine

Leave aside the fact that it is today’s anti-Semites, from Orban and Trump to the Christian Zionists, who are the most avid supporters of the war. That the pre-war pro-Hitler Daily Mail and Express are the most full throated supporters of Israel’s genocidal bombing campaign.

Jacobson and those he represents, resent the accusation that they are weaponising the Holocaust. Such a charge would mean that Israel (or Jews as he calls the murderers)

claim exemption from the obligations that constrain everyone else. And that which you seek to profit by, you lose the right to.

 Perish the thought that Israel might lose the right to commit genocide and ethnic cleansing in the name of the Holocaust. The Holocaust mortgage might even be settled as Walter Goldsmith once suggested.

The Guardian is not a left-wing paper. It is and always has been a liberal imperialist paper which backed the Iraq and Afghanistan wars. I fail to understand why some people are fooled into giving their pennies and pounds to support the exorbitant salaries of the Guardian’s war whores.

Zionism hates the idea that the Holocaust contains universal lessons for humanity about racism and imperialism. Zionism considers that the only lesson of the Holocaust is its entitlement to create a Jewish Supremacist state based on the principles of the Nazi Nuremburg laws.

Separation of the races, opposition to miscegenation and mixed marriages are the principles on which the ‘Jewish’ state was founded. It is not for nothing that the German Zionists were the only ones to welcome Hitler’s race laws, although this is kept quiet today.

The other victims of the Holocaust, such as the Disabled and Roma, are forgotten. The Holocaust for Zionism was unique. It has no universal lessons. The Nazis waged a ‘War Against the Jews in the words of Lucy Dawidowicz.

The ‘eternal Jew’ in the anti-Semites eyes was replaced with an eternal anti-Semitism by the Zionists. They held there was something about the Jews that marked them out for persecution. Anti-Semitism was inherent in the non-Jew and therefore anything was justified to maintain Jewish supremacy.

That is why October 7 was such a shock. It was the first time in 75 years that the Palestinians had fought back, overrunning the military bases that had lain siege to the Gaza Strip, before attacking the nearby Kibbutzim.

There is nothing new in this. When the first slave uprisings took place, the slave owners were equally shocked. And they reacted in similarly brutal ways to the Zionists.

There was the Revolt of Nat Turner in Virginia in August 1831 when 55 white people – women, men and children – were killed. In response an equivalent number of Black people were killed and executed.

The Morant Bay Rebellion in Jamaica in October 1865 resulted in a protest by nominally free Black people being savagely put down by Governor Eyre. Although only 25 people were killed in the initial rebellion some 800 or so people were killed or hanged.

This is the context for the October 7 rebellion. Israel has done its best to portray it as a savage act of violence on the part of Hamas. There was no reason for it other than the fact that they were attacking Jews.

The Mass Rape of Jewish Women by Hamas that Wasn’t

Israeli propagandists have worked hard to provide a multiplicity of lurid stories – of 40 beheaded babies, a baby roasted alive in an oven (Daily Mail) and in the latest installment the mass rape of Jewish women. As each story is discredited another one pops up.

May Golan was appointed to head an Israeli ‘Commission of Inquiry’ into the allegations of rape. Her commission did not though take any testimony from witnesses. Golan was nominated by Netanyahu as Israel’s Consul General in New York before the outraged reaction from American Jews resulted in her nomination being withdrawn. She was described by Ha'aretz as the Minister for Rolling Back the Status of Women and is fiercely anti-feminist.

Scottsboro Boy Framed for Rape

The current rape allegations surrounding October 7 is eerily similar to the use of allegations of rape and sexual assault against indigenous people. Such allegations were routinely made against Black men in the Deep South as a pretext for lynching. See e.g. the case of the Scottsboro Boys, 9 Black teenagers who were accused of raping two white women in Alabama in 1931. They came within an inch of being executed.

Fear of the sexuality of Black or Palestinian men is an integral part of the politics of racially supremacist societies which believe that ‘their’ women should be protected and racial purity maintained. Zionism is no different in this respect to its counterparts in Southern Africa.

Kedar, a Colonel in the IDF, was invited to address a meeting of Sussex Friends of Israel in December 2014

As Ze’eva Levina Chasen wrote in an Open Letter to Burlington Vermont’s Jewish Community regarding the allegations of sexual assault and rape by Hamas fighters:

condemnation of Hamas over them does not support women and girls, Israeli or otherwise, but it does help support the ethnic cleansing of Palestinians including women and girls. Do you really trust a government that forces birth control on Ethiopian Jews, that heavily restricts women’s access to divorce, has anti-miscegenation laws on the books,… If you do, I’ve got a bridge to sell you in Brooklyn.

Furthermore, one cannot truthfully claim to fight for the rights of women and girls if they don’t fight for the rights of women and girls everywhere. Anyone claiming to stand for Israeli women and girls must also denounce the violence committed by the Israeli occupation against Palestinians of every gender and age. Failure to do so is hypocritical to the extreme and should make anyone call into question the accuser’s motives. In addition to that, Eyal Karim, Chief Rabbi of the IDF, has (not only) said that men in combat were allowed to “satisfy the evil inclination by lying with attractive Gentile women against their will”,

Chasen was referring to the appointment of Eyal Karim as the IDF Chief Rabbi despite having said that Jewish law permits ‘raping 'attractive Gentile women' as a way to keep up morale’. Is it seriously suggested that a government which appointed a supporter of raping Palestinian girls and women and which has revelled in its homophobic and anti-feminist politics is now seriously concerned about rape on October 7?

The real sexual abuse is of Palestinian women and girl prisoners. 64% of Palestinian children arrested were found to be abused in 2017, an increase of 4% since a similar report by UNICEF four years previously. A UN Report in 2019 spoke of how Palestinian women prisoners ‘are subjected to a wide range of violence, most notably sexual harassment and rape’. The BBC spoke to six released prisoners 7 days ago, all of whom said they were beaten before leaving jail.

May Golan revealed her real motives when she accused Israeli feminists of being silent when Jewish women are raped and murdered. Rape per se does not concern her.

Plea from British Doctor About Israel’s War Crimes in Gaza

The real horrors, the murder of premature babies and children, have been committed by Israeli soldiers across Gaza. Israel’s invasion of Al Shifa hospital on the pretext it was a Hamas base, its murder of 500+ people at Al Ahli hospital and the murder of over 60 journalists.

The Worst Massacre of Jews Since the Holocaust?

According to the Times of Israel October 7 was ‘the worst massacre of Jews since the Holocaust’.  Except it wasn’t. As a simple matter of statistics Israel’s War of Independence (the Nakba) resulted in over 6,000 deaths and 15,000 wounded. 2,656 died in the 1973 Yom Kippur War.

But this is a false comparison. Jews died in the Holocaust because they were Jews. Israelis , including non-Jews, died on October 7 because they were occupiers and oppressors. To compare the two is to defile the memory of the Jews who died in the Holocaust. There is no similarity at all between the two and only cheap propagandists like Netanyahu make such a comparison.

A letter replying to the Board of Deputies in the Guardian before the letters column had beene Freedlandised

In fact the largest massacre of Jews since the holocaust occurred, not in Palestine but in Argentina. A neo-Nazi Junta took power on March 24 1976 with a version of the International Jewish Conspiracy Theory (the Andinia Plan) based around a troika of Jews – Marx, Einstein and Freud.

The Junta proceeded to round up and torture to death socialists and trade unionists. They particularly targeted left-wing Jews according to Juan Pablo Jaroslavsky of the Barcelona-based Commission of Solidarity with Relatives of the Disappeared.

"Jews represented more than 12 per cent of the victims of the military regime while constituting under 1 per cent of Argentina's population,"

Some 30,000 people are believed to have died under torture or from being thrown from planes over the sea. 3,000 Jews, possibly more, died in what was called the ‘dirty war’ between 1976 and 1983.

One might have expected the ‘Jewish State’ to have strongly attacked the Argentine military’s anti-Semitism. However you would be wrong. Israel was part of the anti-communist Operation Condor in Latin America with Argentina, Chile and other death squad regimes. Israel had a very lucrative arms trade with the regime, especially when Congress put an end to selling arms to the Junta.

Israel is using White Phosphorous in Gaza

I have a chapter in my book on this sordid episode. Indeed the subtitle, ‘The Weaponisation of Memory in the Service of State & Nation’ could have been written with the current crisis in mind.

Ethnic Cleansing – The Real Purpose of the War

The pretext for Israel’s war on Gaza is to eradicate Hamas. This is a lie. Israel has been waging war against the people of Gaza, including its children. The one group that has not been affected is Hamas who are in the tunnels fighting.

It is becoming ever more clear that both the United States and Israel have agreed that the Palestinians of Gaza should be transferred to Egypt and other countries. Although the White House issued a denial:

“The vice president reiterated that under no circumstances will the United States permit the forced relocation of Palestinians from Gaza or the West Bank,”

the key word is ‘forced’. If Israel bombs every school, hospital and home in Gaza and Palestinians are forced to go to Rafah to escape and then seek to cross the border that will be voluntary. Such is the trickery of those war criminals Biden and Kamala Harris.

Democracy for the Arab World Now (DAWN) urged Congress to reject a supplementary funding bill that proposes funding humanitarian aid to Palestinians who have been displaced from Gaza to neighboring countries. Israeli actions and statements for example the article in the Jerusalem Post of 19 November from Israel’s Intelligence Minister, Gila Gamliel, make it crystal clear that Israel’s intention is to enact a second Nakba. A leaked policy document from Israel’s Intelligence Ministry recommends the permanent forced transfer of Palestinians to the Sinai.

"The Biden administration isn't just giving a green light for ethnic cleansing—it's bankrolling it," said Sarah Leah Whitson of DAWN.

"Gaslighting Americans into facilitating long-held Israeli plans to depopulate Gaza under the cover of 'humanitarian aid' is a cruel and grotesque hoax." 

It is precisely now that The Guardian/Observer, which initiated the false ‘anti-Semitism’ smear campaign against Jeremy Corbyn decided to gaslight supporters of the Palestinians, including Jews, by running an article by Zionist propagandist Howard JacobsonCharging Jews with genocide is to declare them guilty of precisely what was done to them.’

Editor-in-chief Kath Viner and the Zionist Gatekeeper, Jonathan Freedland, spent 5 years telling us that without the IHRA misdefinition of anti-Semitism it would be impossible to fight anti-Semitism.

The IHRA says that ‘Holding Jews collectively responsible for actions of the state of Israel’ is anti-Semitic, yet when it comes to protecting Israel’s right to commit genocide, Viner and Freedland, are happy to conflate Israel’s actions with Jews. Such is the hypocrisy of these police-state liberals.

Let this sink in. Alleging that Israel, not Jews, because Israel is a State not a Jew, is committing genocide and ethnic cleansing in Gaza, means accusing all Jews of perpetrating a Holocaust. It is difficult to imagine a more overt act of anti-Semitism by these righteous hypocrites.

The IHRA also outlaws ‘Drawing comparisons of contemporary Israeli policy to that of the Nazis.’ However there was always a secret provision in the IHRA which said that if Zionists made these comparisons they were not anti-Semitic!

Jacobson, a lightweight intellectual and minor novelist makes a virtue of his stupidity, denying that Israel is committing genocide because it leafleted the population it bombed beforehand! Presumably it was a suicidal inclination on the part of the 6,000+ children Israel murdered that led them to stay put. Or perhaps the Israeli generals are as big a liars as Jacobson. Freedland is also a columnist on the Jewish Chronicle which has given full-throated support to Israel’s genocide.


Biden Staffers Are Turning Against His Israel Support. We Spoke to a Dissenter

The Genocide Convention 1948, drawn up in the wake of the Holocaust, was clear that an intention ‘to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group’ by means such as killing members of the group or ‘Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction’ is genocide.

The deliberate bombing of Gaza’s hospitals, the murder of premature babies, leaving their decomposing bodies to be eaten by wild animals, may be acceptable in the polite salons that Jacobson and Freedland frequent but no civilized member of society should be seen shaking the bloodied hands of these creatures.

Tony Greenstein

Below is the Diary Entry of Hudia, a Refugee in Rafah on Her Daily Existence as a Consequence of Israel’s War Crimes – It Speaks Volumes to Howard Jacobson’s Use of the Holocaust to Excuse Israel’s Collective Punishment of Gaza’s Palestinians

DECEMBER 5, 2023

I don't know if my message will reach you today. They cut off communications and Internet from Gaza. The situation here is now even more terrifying since they started operations in the south.

The bombing doesn’t stop for a second. The firing of missiles & rockets happens around the clock. The artillery shelling is endless, too. Its sound is horrific. Where we are in Rafah is close to the eastern border of Gaza. We do not sleep because of the intensity of the bombing. The bombing of homes over the heads of those who live in them has become Israel’s preferred method of killing. Fear for the lives of everyone has crept into me. It haunts all my waking moments.

They ask people to leave so they die on the way to displacement, and if they manage to arrive, they die in the areas they reach. Rafah has now become overwhelmed with displaced people from Khan Yunis as well as the north. There is no place for them in shelter centers. People sleep in the streets. Literally, there is nothing here except the pervasive smell of death. I do not know how we will end up. 

No. I know.

We can't find anything anymore. There is nothing left in the markets. I can no longer find my blood pressure medication in pharmacies. In fact, there is nothing in pharmacies, markets, or supermarkets. Life has become difficult beyond description. Here, my brother Hisham was able, after a great effort, to find a medication similar to what I take which, I hope, is better than nothing at all.

Honestly, though, cutting off communications and the Internet hurts me more than the war itself. I cannot check on my family or friends. I remain tense every time I hear the sound of bombing. I do not know if they are alive or dead. I feel like I will lose my balance and collapse at any moment. The situation is unbelievable. 

No one would believe we are supposed to be living here. It is a slaughter house; a last stop on the train taking us to our deaths. Let them kill us all at once! This would be merciful now. 

We are tired. We are tired of losing more and more people every day, hour, and minute. Walk around Rafah and you see huge bomb craters filled with human debris. Is this really my home? Endless destruction and seeing children in pieces. It is unspeakable. 

There is nothing left in north Gaza: homes, people, or life.

Diseases have begun to spread among children, including gastroenteritis owing to air pollution, undrinkable water, and a collapsed sewage system because there is no fuel. You don’t want to imagine what this means in real terms here, and for two million people. The lines, the filth, the sadness, and yes - the smell.

The children have yellow faces - full of sickness and fear. They cry into their mothers’ laps during the bombings. They look thin and sickly from terror and trauma. By destroying the healthcare system Israel has destroyed any return to a semblance of real life. 

A sad joke is going around. After the occupation’s aggression against Gaza, when a violent earthquake strikes a place, reporters will say: “It is as if an Israeli bombing struck the place.”

Director of UNRWA Operations in Gaza:

Even in Rafah, where people are forced to flee, the sounds of air strikes punctuate the day. People are crying for help to get a safe place. We have nothing to say to them.

War Criminals All

DECEMBER 6, 2023

Gaza City and northern Gaza are completely annihilated, with only rare media coverage. The central part of the Gaza Strip is now annihilated by hunger, & high prices; its supplies of vegetables and goods were cut off after the south was separated from the central governorate. 

In addition, it is being bombarded relentlessly day and night. Khan Yunis - the southern section of Gaza - is also being destroyed by displacement and continuous bombing. Rafah is bombed around the clock (I’m counting 8-12 seconds between bombs) and has received newly displaced people from Khan Yunis, but where are they supposed to go? 

People sleep in tents and in the streets or in the shadows of shuttered businesses. The sounds of artillery, air and sea bombardment, and tank shells echo across the Gaza Strip from Rafah to Beit Hanoun. It’s a constant rush in your ears. There is no escape.

This situation requires no political, military, or strategic analysts. No sermon about steadfastness from leaders and media are going to help us right now. Gaza is absolutely no longer fit for life and it makes sense because I don’t think we are alive. We are ghosts and we should go and haunt the world revealing what has happened to us.

Whole families have been tossed grieving along the streets. Shelter centers and schools are overflowing with broken, displaced people. Most stores have shut their doors because they’re empty of any supplies. What remains is small and non-essential. Prices are astronomical and crazy. 

Lines from wherever there are any goods at all - long, long lines where you are stuck waiting for half the day. 

Exhausted refugees are wearing filthy clothing (where can we wash dirty laundry?) Most of the women are in their prayer dresses. Wood burning stoves fill the main streets. Everything is cooked on wood fires now and they fill the air with smoke.  The ground around them is blackened and peoples faces are blackened. This is a preview of the apocalypse: yes, right here in Gaza you can witness what the end of the world will look like.

As you walk, you pass faces of those who used to be proud and generous but are now humiliated and betrayed. They half-whisper, brokenly, in your ear: “I swear, I am not a beggar. But I was displaced from my home here and here. My family and children have nothing to eat. If you give me five shekels...”

This is only part of the picture, which is getting darker, more unbearable, and more painful every day with the siege and death. I do not know if death is worse than what people are experiencing now. What new, unthinkable circumstance will be thrown our way tomorrow? It’s too horrible to contemplate. I want to run away…

5 June 2023

#MeToo & #Guardian Hypocrisy - Why did the Guardian Protect Nick Cohen, who for 20 years Sexually Abused Young Female Journalists?

How does Kath Viner & Jonathan Freedland Square #MeToo with paying off Cohen and Penalising the Victims?


#MeToo in the media Good Law Project

As the old saying goes, hypocrisy is the tribute that vice pays to virtue and The Guardian’s hypocrisy is indeed a vice.

If there was an award for the most rabidly racist, war-mongering, anti-Corbyn ‘journalist’ the name of Nick Cohen would come high if not top of the list. Despite his name he isn’t Jewish though he began to claim that too with an article ‘Hatred is turning me into a Jew’.

Seven years later, as the anti-Corbyn campaign was getting going, Cohen penned an article Why I’m becoming a Jew and why you should, too. Clearly his conversion was taking a long time!

 ‘My name is Nick Cohen, and I think I’m turning into a Jew. Despite being called “Cohen”, I’ve never been Jewish before.

An open invitation from Nick Cohen for every racist troll to convert to Judaism

When anti-Semitism was a genuine form of racism, Jews were identified with the left and trade unionism. Zionism has managed to transform Jews into an object of admiration for the racist right.

Back in the early years of New Labour Cohen was a decent journalist, writing a weekly column on the back page of the Observer. His politics were Tribunite. He consistently attacked New Labour’s policies towards refugees. He even opposed the Blair government’s introduction of Holocaust Memorial Day.

My email to Jonathan Freedland, the Guardian's Zionist Gatekeeper Goes Unanswered

Then 9/11 happened and with it the War on Terror. Cohen jack-knifed to the right, becoming an Islamaphobe and a supporter of the Iraq and Afghanistan wars. Thus was born the anti-Corbyn fiend and sexual predator that Freedland and Viner did their best to protect.

My favourite Cohen article is Don’t tell me you weren’t warned about Corbyn which he wrote just before Theresa May called a general election in April 2017. This latter-day Nostradamus predicted that:

On current polling, Labour will get around a quarter of the vote. Imagine, though, how the Labour party will fare in an election campaign when its leaders are Corbyn, John McDonnell, Emily Thornberry and Diane Abbott… The Tories have gone easy on Corbyn and his comrades to date for the transparently obvious reason that they want to keep them in charge of Labour.

In an election, they would tear them to pieces. They will expose the far left’s record of excusing the imperialism of Vladimir Putin’s gangster state, the oppressors of women and murderers of gays in Iran, the IRA, and every variety of inquisitorial and homicidal Islamist movement… Will there be 150, 125, 100 Labour MPs by the end of the flaying? My advice is to think of a number then halve it.

Cohen’s final paragraph to those supporting Corbyn was:

In my respectful opinion, your only honourable response will be to stop being a fucking fool by changing your fucking mind.

It is such sentiments that make Cohen an object of admiration for Hadley Freeman, Tanya Gold and all the other journalistic detritus.

This blog was alone in predicting Corbyn's unexpected success in 2017

In the wake of the June 2017 election, when Labour – despite the sabotage of the right - gained 30 seats and the highest swing since 1945 – I wrote a blog Jeremy Corbyn and the Humiliation of Nick Cohen. Almost alone amongst commentators I predicted the outcome. With the polls showing a lead of over 20% I wrote:

… it was Harold Wilson who said that a week is a long time in politics. Seven weeks is a political eternity. Theresa May has taken a gamble that her 21% lead will hold. It is a gamble that she may yet come to regret.

There is only one direction that her lead can go, and that is down. Once her lead falls, then a snowball effect can take over. What is essential is that Labour marks out the key areas on which it is going to base its appeal. The danger is that Corbyn is going to continue with his ‘strategy’ of appeasing the right and appealing to all good men and women....

Theresa May is a cautious conservative. She is literally the product of her background - a conservative vicar’s daughter. Reactionary, parochial and small-minded, she is a bigot for all seasons.

On 3 June I wrote General Election - Is Labour on the threshold of victory? After the result I wrote to Kath Viner, offering to replace Nick Cohen at half his salary. For reasons which remain difficult to understand to this day Viner ignored my generous offer!

Nick Cohen Leaves The Guardian for ‘Health Reasons’

In January 2023 Cohen left The Guardian. According to The Telegraph Guardian News and Media (GNM)

did not mention that Cohen left the newspaper with a settlement following complaints of sexual harassment that spanned a period of 17 years

The Guardian said that Cohen’s departure was for ‘health’ reasons whereas the real reason was that he had had been a sexual predator, preying on young female journalists, some with mental health problems, others on temporary contracts.

The Guardian’s deception was only successful because other newspapers colluded with them. [See Nick Cohen, Phillip Schofield and British media’s own #MeToo reckoning, The Week, 1.6.23].

Kath Viner got rid of its cartoonist of 40 years standing, Steve Bell, the only decent journalist left on the paper - Viner ruled that the appearance of Razan Al Najar - the 21 year old Palestinian medic killed by Netanyahu's snipers in Gaza, in Theresa May's fireplace was 'antisemitic'

My email to Guardian editor Kath Viner also goes unanswered

In a puff to gullible readers who are asked to fund Kath Viner’s half a million pound salary, The Guardian commits itself to delivering

fearless, investigative journalism – giving a voice to the powerless and holding power to account.”

Novara Media on Nick Cohen cover up

Except, it seems, when the powerless happen to be young, female journalists in its newsroom.

The Guardian Investigates Cohen or Does It?

In January 2018 Lucy Siegle reported Cohen for groping her. Siegle started at The Guardian around 2001 as an editorial assistant. She described standing at a photocopier when Cohen appeared behind her, cupped her bottom with both hands, grunted and breathed heavily into her ear.

Siegle remembers returning to her desk, humiliated. She never considered reporting him. “I’m literally the least powerful person in the entire newsroom.”. For 14 years she avoided his desk and chaperoned interns “like a mother hen crossing a busy road.”

The #MeToo movement was sweeping through society on Feb. 1, 2018, when Siegle met with Guardian Managing Editor Jan Thompson. Siegle described what happened next.

The meeting began with me. I described why I was there, and went on to tell the senior executive about Nick Cohen’s assault on me. There was not much response at this point, just a blank stare which I felt to be slightly hostile. But when I mentioned that I was aware there had been another allegation, the senior executive became animated.

They set me straight (“That sort of Twitter allegation would not be investigated in that way ever…”) and pulled a face of disgust at the very idea of that allegation. The executive also denied any knowledge about any allegation.

The meeting continued and the exec pointed out a number of times that it would be difficult for me to proceed with my complaint anonymously and made it sound as if I will have to go head-to-head with “Nick”. He was called by his first name throughout, and there was lengthy speculation from the exec about what he might say and how he might be affected by such an allegation.

The main concern of Thompson was about the possibility that Siegle would write about what happened. Thompson’s main concern was the alleged abuse that Cohen faced for his political views, according to notes Siegle wrote afterward. She described the meeting as a “chaotic mess of defensiveness and attack.”

The exec then told me that Nick Cohen was frequently targeted for abuse because of his political standpoint. They sounded like they were defending a very precious asset, their star striker. I could not understand why this was remotely relevant, but my brain began to compute that this conversation was not welcome….

By the time the meeting finished, I felt like I had been in a laundry cycle, but also a bit like I’d been beaten up. As happens with these things, you pore over them afterwards to make sure that you haven’t been over-sensitive or misread.

Because of this hostile reaction, Siegle decided not to pursue the complaint within GNM.

You might think The Guardian’s response was strange given that in its Leader The Guardian view on #MeToo: what comes next? they wrote:

No woman should suffer socially, economically or professionally for challenging her abuser. But how much harder it is to speak out when the cost may be not only your career, but the ability to pay the rent or feed your children. And how much more likely you are to be targeted when predatory men know that...

Even now, women are paying a price for speaking out. Much discussion has skipped past the primary question – how women should be treated in the workplace – to fixate on how perpetrators should be treated, without pausing to acknowledge the penalties that victims have already paid.

The Guardian was keen to hear from victims of sexual harassment everywhere but the Guardian!

One week before Siegle’s complaint The Guardian solicited tips about workplace sexual harassment. They said:

We take all allegations of workplace harassment extremely seriously and aim to support victims in all circumstances. We have processes which anyone can use to raise complaints so that they can be fully investigated.

Siegle wrote of how she was aware of several other women who had also been “discouraged” by The Guardian from taking forward their complaints.

New York Times Breaks the story that the British press, including Private Eye, Wouldn’t Touch

On 30 May the New York Times [NYT] ran British Reporter Had a Big #MeToo Scoop. Her Editor Killed It about what had happened at The Guardian and the Financial Times [FT]. It spoke of 7 women who had made allegations against Cohen but no paper would touch it because ‘Britain’s news media has a complicated relationship with outing its own.’

Lucy Siegle is one of multiple women to accuse the British columnist Nick Cohen of unwanted sexual advances and groping.Credit...Andrew Testa for The New York Times

The NYT revealed that FT journalist Madison Marriage secured a “potentially explosive scoop” on the real reason behind Cohen’s departure but her story was spiked by Editor Roula Khalaf. Marriage had evidence that his departure followed years of unwanted sexual advances and groping of female journalists.

The FT’s explanation was that “Some reporting leads to published stories and some not.”

Jane Bradley interviewed more than 35 journalists at The Guardian and FT to examine sexual misconduct in Britain’s news media.

Marriage had already begun investigating Cohen but Roula Khalaf halted the investigation, telling Marriage not to contact any new sources. Her team had already interviewed five of Cohen’s accusers.

Two women were willing to speak openly, and Marriage had supporting documentation on others. Khalaf said that Cohen did not have a big enough business profile to make him an “F.T. story”. Publicly, the FT had declared “no topic or scandal off limits.”

In February Khalaf said she would not run the investigation as a news article, several journalists recalled, and suggested that Marriage file it as an opinion piece. She did, but it still did not run.

The Financial Times editor Roula Khalaf during an appearance last year on the BBC. Credit...James Manning/PA Images, via Getty Images

A native of Lebanon, Khalaf is not a British media insider. Colleagues described her as a cautious editor, and some said the Cohen article had fallen victim to an institutional conflict between the newspaper’s investigative aspirations and its conservative, business roots.

The spiking of the FT article hit Siegle especially hard. ‘Now it seemed the whole industry was protecting itself.’ She described how the response to the story showed

“#MeToo is nothing but a convenient hashtag for the British media. The silence on its own industry is just really conspicuous.”

Cohen was seen as someone with influence, former colleagues said. Credit...Marco Secchi/Getty Images

Cohen however was unrepentant. He told the NYT that it wasn’t the women he abused who were the victims: He was the “only person whose life is turned over because of this”. 

A GNM spokesperson told The Telegraph that the organisation “instigated our own HR investigations” in 2018, but the group said the victim “did not wish to pursue the complaint”. Siegle asked

If Britain’s most stridently liberal newspaper fails to deal with claims of sexual harassment by one of its leading writers, what does it say about the supposed progress of the #MeToo movement

On October 6 2021 Siegle posted on Twitter describing her experience at The Guardian.

“I don’t normally read Nick Cohen’s column in the Observer. Ever since he ‘groped’ me at the photocopier (zero marks for originality) at work when I was an admin assistant in my early 20s I have avoided being anywhere near him. But I do think he is a total creep…. lurking in the shadows to lay your hands on an underling (or anyone) is not to my mind compatible with the position he presents.”

It was through going public that she heard from other victims of Cohen, as did the Good Law Project [GLP]. The experiences of Women 1-5, as the GLP refers to the complainants (Siegle is W2) featured in a thread posted by Jolyon Maugham. Many more have come forward since.

GNM turned down a request for an independent inquiry into its complaint processes and handling of the complaints. Siegle told how

Nick Cohen is now co-operating with GNM on an investigation and his column has been “paused”. He has previously denied allegations as “vile and untrue”. I am sure that if Jolyon, myself, and the other Ws had not pushed and posted threads it would still be business as usual in Guardian HQ.

On 4 August 2022 Siegle wrote, not in The Guardian but the New European that

It was during this time as an admin assistant that I was assaulted by Nick Cohen, a prominent and highly-regarded journalist and, until this week when his column was “paused” as he is investigated by the company, still a star columnist on The Observer, as well as other publications including The Spectator and Private Eye.

Cohen spent two decades as a columnist for The Observer. ‘Inside the newsroom, he was seen as influential, colleagues said, someone who could help your career.’

His resignation in January cited “health grounds.” Secretly, the newspaper group paid him a financial settlement for quitting and agreed to confidentiality, according to three colleagues and an editor with whom Mr. Cohen spoke.

This cartoon was also deemed 'antisemitic' by Freedland's witchhunters

In his farewell, editors praised his “brilliant” and “incisive” coverage. Seven women told the NYT that Cohen had groped them or made other unwanted sexual advances over nearly two decades. Four insisted on anonymity, fearing professional repercussions.

Siegle recounted Cohen grabbing her bottom in the newsroom around 2001. Five other women described similar encounters at pubs from 2008 to 2015. One said Mr. Cohen had pressed his erection against her thigh and kissed her uninvited when they met to discuss her career. A seventh said Mr. Cohen had repeatedly offered to send her explicit photographs in 2018 while she worked as an unpaid copy editor for him.

This cartoon too was deemed 'antisemitic' by Freedland's witchhunters

Cohen’s reputation was widely known in the newsroom, according to 10 former colleagues. Five women said he had groped them after work at pubs, including one who said he had groped her “five or six” times in 2008. One said she and other female journalists had used a different entrance to a pub to avoid being groped by him. Another woman said she had avoided the bar downstairs from the newsroom after Mr. Cohen grabbed her knee during work drinks.

Private Eye too did not cover his departure. When a reader emailed asking why, Editor Ian Hislop replied:

“Coverage of Nick Cohen’s departure from The Observer is obviously more problematic for The Eye than the others that you mention due to the fact that he used to write a freelance column for the magazine.”

Hislop said he had discussed the terms of The Guardian’s deal with Cohen. “Instead of any conclusion,” Hislop said of The Guardian investigation, “it ended up with a secret agreement and a big cash payment.”

In the end the ratbiter was bitten where it hurts most but Ian Hislop joined the Street of Shame in not telling the Eye's readers why

Cohen’s column in Private Eye was called Ratbiter, which regularly defamed Corbyn supporters including Greg Hadfield and myself. It was a litany of lies but Private Eye supported Cohen’s false ‘anti-Semitism’ accusations. Cohen’s departure from the Eye was mentioned only in The Press Gazette, a media trade website.

In a phone interview with the NYT, Cohen said he did not have the “faintest idea” about Siegle’s accusation and questioned why she had waited so long to report it. He said the conversation with the copy editor was “joking” among friends. He blamed the accusations on a campaign by supporters of Russia and transgender rights!

Steve Bell - the only honest journalist on the Guardian was sacked by Kath Viner

Informed that seven women had complained Cohen exclaimed, “Oh, God. I assume it’s stuff I was doing when I was drunk”. In a subsequent email, Cohen did not respond to specific accusations.

“I have written at length about my alcoholism. I went clean seven years ago in 2016. I look back on my addicted life with deep shame.

Jean Hannah Edelstein, an assistant at The Observer from 2007 to 2009, said Cohen was not alone in his behaviour. She recalled her editor hitting her with a sex whip as she walked by. Over one boozy lunch, she said, the same editor offered to help her career and suggested that she pose naked to promote her book.

Another woman, a freelancer who had recently been homeless and had depression, said she had met Cohen at a pub in 2010 to discuss her career. As they chatted, she said, he suddenly kissed her on the mouth and pressed his erection against her thigh. She said she fled.

“I just remember walking along Waterloo Bridge and thinking, ‘I can’t go to The Guardian with this. Who would they believe? He was one of their stars, and I was a freelance journalist with mental health issues.”

Heather Brooke, an investigative journalist, said she had initially dismissed her encounter with Mr. Cohen at the 2008 awards ceremony as “a one-off drunken mistake and didn’t take it further.” (“Nick Cohen got drunk and slapped my ass … ugh!” she wrote in her diary the next day.)

Rebecca Watson

Rebecca Watson, a writer and commentator, said Cohen had grabbed her bottom at a book party in 2009.

“To sexually assault a stranger at a book launch, to be one of the more prominent people there, and to just assume there will be no comeuppance,”

Not long after Siegle lodged her 2018 complaint records show that Cohen began working with a freelance copy editor, a single mother with autism.

She worked remotely for Cohen, unpaid. On June 29 2018, a work conversation on Twitter became punctuated with mutually flirtatious jokes. Cohen offered to send an explicit photograph. The woman declined. Cohen persisted and she deflected again.

In the following days, the copy editor said, Cohen turned cold. In messages, she apologised if she had misread the situation. Eventually, she told him continuing to work together “would be at a cost too high for my own mental health.”

Cohen, in an email to the NYT, said this was the only accusation to surface since he quit drinking and said it had been misrepresented.

It involves a friendship with a woman I never met that, sadly, went badly wrong.

In 2019, the copy editor asked The Guardian’s HR team about the process for raising sexual misconduct claims. She described the incident without naming Cohen, saying she felt “huge pressure” to go along with his “banter.”

Because she was not an employee, the copy editor said she was told that she would not be informed of the investigation’s outcome. Being frozen out of the process terrified her, so she backed off. This is almost certainly unlawful and someone personally contracting to do work is covered by discrimination legislation.

In the autumn of 2021, Siegle wrote on Twitter about her experience. Her lawyer, Jolyon Maugham, began making noises. Jan Thompson immediately emailed Siegle offering an investigation and accusing her of turning down a previous offer in 2018, which Siegle denied.

Eventually Cohen was suspended and The Guardian hired a law firm to carry out an independent inquiry. Neither Siegle nor the copy editor agreed to participate.

Suffice to say The Guardian has not offered Lucy Siegle or any other woman journalist the opportunity to put their side of the story. Freedom of the press and #MeToo  has its limits, after all!

Tony Greenstein

The Financial Times building in London. The newspaper spiked an investigation into Nick Cohen, a columnist at The Observer. Credit...Andrew Testa for The NYT