The BBC’s Coverage of October 7 Was on a Par With Its Genocide Denial Throughout the Holocaust in Gaza

No Mention of the Hannibal Doctrine, No Mention of Israel’s 17 Year Siege of Gaza, No Mention of Israel’s Policy of ‘Mowing the Lawn’ – For the BBC History Began on October 7

Tzipi Hotoveli Interview With Piers Morgan

Dear Tim Davie,

You should be congratulated on your coverage of the second anniversary of October 7. Once again, you have faithfully acted as the Foreign Office’s Obedient Servant. I compliment you on your skill in manipulating language in an attempt to erase from memory the Genocide in Gaza.

‘Genocide’ is a word that the BBC decided to ban despite every human rights organisation, from Amnesty to B’tselem  and the UN’s own Commission concluding that genocide was taking place.

Not only did the BBC not use the word Genocide but it interrupted guests at least 100 times when they dared to mention the word. As the Media Monitoring Report on your Double Standards asked

Why has the BBC downplayed genocide allegations over 100 times while omitting Israeli genocidal statements such as Netanyahu’s Amalek reference cited by the ICJ?’ 

It’is a good question but I suspect that you don’t have an answer which isn’t economical with the truth. Either way it shows whose side you were on.

In July 2024 an article in The Lancet estimated that the true figure of Palestinians killed, after 9 months, was 186,000 direct and indirect deaths. After 24 months that figure would be 496,000. However given the starvation blockade by Israel since March 2025 the numbers may be considerably higher.

Dr Gideon Polya estimated in January 2025 that the true figure of direct and indirect deaths may have been 553,000.

This tallies with the number that Israel’s Ambassador to London, Tzipi Hotoveli estimated might need to be killed, 600,000, when she was interviewed by Piers Morgan in October 2023.

So what does the BBC do after two years of Israel’s genocidal attack on Gaza?   It focuses its attention on the Israeli ‘victims’ of October 7.

It is as if a history of the Warsaw Ghetto were to focus on a sympathetic portrait of the Nazis who died in the Uprising rather than the Jews who died in the fighting.

It is clear where the BBC’s sympathies lie.  With the modern day Nazis who killed the human animals occupying Gaza Ghetto and who sought to ethnically cleanse Gaza.

Throughout the Gaza holocaust the BBC has deliberately ignored the genocidal statements of intent by Israeli ministers such as Amichai Eliyahu who first called for a nuclear bomb to be dropped on Gaza and in May 2025 called for food reserves in Gaza to be bombed. "They need to starve," he said.

Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich on 6 May 2025 told settler representatives that

Within a few months, we will be able to declare that we have won. Gaza will be totally destroyed

But if the BBC minimised Palestinian suffering it magnified that of Israel. In your coverage you repeatedly said ‘about 1200 Israelis were killed’. In fact 1,139 died according to Bituah Leumi, Israel's social security agency.

Israeli forces shot their own civilians, kibbutz survivor says (Full with subtitles)

Of the Israelis who died just one baby, Mila Cohen, died and that was accidental. Compare that to the thousands of Palestinians babies murdered. Approximately 400 soldiers and police were killed. Not once has the BBC mentioned that one-third of those killed on October 7 were legitimate military targets.

About 750 civilians died. However it is clear that the majority of them were killed by Israel itself which put the Hannibal Directive into operation as early as 7.18 a.m. when an order was issued to despatch a Zik, an attack drone, against soldiers at Erez Junction.

The Hannibal Directive says that if a soldier is in danger of being captured he should be killed. It was employed throughout October 7. Is there a reason that the BBC has never, not once, mentioned the term Hannibal Directive even though Israeli papers have frequently discussed it?  This is news management worthy of Pravda.

The only survivor of a house in Kibbutz Be’eri that was shelled by an Israeli tank, Yasmine Porat, told Israel’s Kan Radio that 13 Israeli hostages were killed by Israeli security forces. She also said that she and other civilians were treated humanely by the Palestinian fighters.

Israeli State Radio 15.10.23. (jpg)

Tank fires on Israeli civilian home in Kibbutz Be'eri, 7 October 2023

In Samantha Simmons broadcast on October 7 she mentioned the attack on Kibbutz Be’eri, where 101 Israelis died.  What was not mentioned was the fact, (Ha'aretz 7.7.24) that Brig. Gen. Barak Hiram gave orders for a tank to fire on a house holding 14 hostages including Yasmine Porat.  The same happened throughout Kibbutz Be’eri but the BBC thought that such matters might confuse people and its message that the October 7 attack was unprovoked. 

Ha'aretz’s Nir Hasson quoted a resident of Be’eri, Tuval, who spoke about the ‘difficult decisions’ of Israeli commanders which:

 Include(d) shelling houses with all their occupants inside in order to eliminate the terrorists along with the hostages... The price was terrible: at least 112 Be’eri people were killed.”

Why has none of this been mentioned by the BBC?

The implication is clear. The Israelis who died at Be’eri, one-seventh of all Israeli civilians killed, were killed by Israeli tanks.

Video released by Israeli army shows helicopters firing indiscriminately on 7 October

Sourced from YNet

This is how so many cars at the music festival ended up destroyed. Apache helicopters!
FYI : The IDF collected all the destroyed cars and arranged them one month after the incident pic.twitter.com/sHVL4YIMIT

— Syrian Girl (@Partisangirl) November 9, 2023

The lie that October 7 was the beginning of history is best illustrated by the Israeli phrase that it was moving the lawn (or grass) in Gaza. As John Feffor of the Institute of Policy Studies explained:

Ever since it withdrew its settlements in 2005, Israel has periodically attacked Gaza. This shelling of locations throughout the narrow strip of land gave rise to the Israeli expression “mowing the lawn.” In other words, Israel was bombing Gaza on a regular basis to “maintain order.”

Razan al-Najar 

In other words Israel has periodically attacked Gaza with overwhelming force every few years in order to ensure that Gazans understood who was in charge.  Attacks by Israel occurred in 2008/9 (Operation Cast Lead), 2012 (Pillar of Defence), 2014 (Protective Edge), the Great Return March (March 2018) and May 2021. Thousands of Palestinians were killed and injured in these attacks so the BBC pretence that nothing had occurred before October 2023 is an egregious lie.

The Great Return March of 2018 was completely peaceful but Israeli snipers fired from earth banks thousands of rounds which killed about 300 people and injured thousands (they had been told to fire at knee caps in order to deliberately disable as many as possible). This was symbolised by the deliberate murder of the unarmed Razan al-Najar, a 20 year old medic.

Likewise there was no mention of the Apache helicopters which Israel used throughout the day to fire on any vehicle returning to Gaza or thought likely to do so. There is abundant evidence that their pilots shot at everything that moved and killed the occupants of the cars, Israelis included.

Drone footage from the scene of the music festival shows the damaged cars before they were rearranged by the IDF. pic.twitter.com/qs6F9SZh3S

— Syrian Girl (@Partisangirl) November 9, 2023

 The Israeli military released drone footage showing hundreds of scorched and damaged cars moved from the Nova music festival, providing further evidence that Israeli forces likely killed many of their own on 7 October, as RT reported on 6 November.  Hamas fighers were carrying light weapons which could not possibly have caused such damage.

Perhaps you can explain why the Australian Broadcasting Service can run a story ‘Israeli forces accused of killing their own citizens under the 'Hannibal Directive' during October 7 chaos’ but the BBC is incapable of doing so? Don’t worry I know the answer Tim which is that you were put into the BBC in order to ensure that you continued to function as the Voice of Israel.

I hesitate to ask why the figures of dead and injured from Gaza’s Health Ministry are always accompanied by a reference to Hamas-run, whereas the BBC never refers to Israeli propaganda as Likud-run. After all it is Israel which has consistently lied throughout the genocide, to the extent of barring reporters from entering Gaza and doing its best to kill those who are already there.

Israel murdered 15 Medics on 23 March whilst claiming that they had approached Israeli troops in unlit vehicles. When this was proved to be a lie, as video footage had been collected from one of the dead bodies, Israel claimed that it was all a ‘mistake’, an explanation that the BBC carried faithfully.

Under your genocide cleansing leadership the BBC pulled from ‘i’ player Gaza: How to Survive a Warzone, a film starring a 13 year old Palestinian narrator Abdullah because his father was deputy Agriculture Minister in Gaza’s government, as if the sins of the father are those of the children.  No evidence has ever been produced that the father was a member of Hamas, not that that should have made any difference. At least he wasn’t a member of Religious Zionism.

And if one act of cowardice was not enough, you pulled Gaza: Doctors Under Attack because of concerns over impartiality.  Presumably it is BBC policy not to differentiate between Good and Evil. I can only assume that future BBC programmes on the Holocaust will include neo-Nazis and holocaust deniers being allowed equal time for the sake of ‘balance’.

Gaza’s genocide is a holocaust and the BBC has been an accomplice to that genocide.

Tony Greenstein

An Open Letter to the Metropolitan Police’s Racist Anti-Palestinian Commissioner, Mark Rowley

You Have Done Your Best To Ban Demonstrations Against Gaza’s Genocide – Using Jews As Your Moral Alibi – That Makes You Not the Protesters anti-Semitic

Emailed to:  mark.rowley@met.police.uk

Dear Sir Mark Rowley,

You do not know me. I am just one of the thousands who have been wrongfully arrested by your officers.

The Battle of Cable Street

On October 4^th 2024, the 88^th anniversary of the Battle of Cable Street, when the Met tried to batter their way through 200,000 anti-fascists in order to allow supporters of the British Union of Fascists to march through the Jewish East End, I was arrested at the Swiss Cottage demonstration against Israel’s racist and genocidal Ambassador Tzipi Hotoveli. I was accused of having committed a ‘racially aggravated offence’.

My ‘crime’ was having compared the Israeli state to Nazi Germany. I cited an article in which I compared the Nazi holocaust to the Israeli holocaust.

Tony Greenstein arrested for his speech outside the residence of Israels Ambassador Tzipi Hotoveli

On 13^th November I was informed that you would not be charging me. My arrest was thus unlawful. I told your officers that I was disappointed that I could not challenge in court your attack on freedom of speech and your belief that policing political speech is part of the Met’s duties.

I know that people in your position have no sense of irony but arresting Jewish people for anti-Semitism is like awarding Henry Kissinger the Nobel Peace Prize.

Tony Greenstein Speech in Liverpool 12 January 2025 at Palestine Solidarity Demo

You have made it clear that that the only Jews who count are racists and Zionists. Anti-Zionist and anti-racist Jews are invisible because we refuse to be the moral alibi for the British government’s complicity in the Genocide in Gaza.

The constant theme when banning Palestinian demonstrations is that solidarity with Palestine is inherently anti-Jewish. That’s why on December 7 your officers surrounded the Jewish Bloc in order to ‘protect’ them from other marchers!

You have now abused your powers once again to ban the demonstration against Israel’s Ambassador over a large part of North London. The pretext is that it’s a ‘Jewish’ area despite only 8.5% of Swiss Cottage residents being Jewish. Again the assumption is that Jews support Genocide. If anyone Sir Mark is an anti-Semite it is you.

It is time that you got it through your thick head that not all Jews support Zionism, Israeli Genocide. Historically Jews have been in the forefront of opposition to racism & fascism.

Mark Rowley's Police State in Action - Demonstrations on Palestine are Banned from the Area in Red

Today there is a growing Jewish revolt against Israel’s neo-Nazi politics of ethnic cleansing. People realise that one of the lessons of the Holocaust is opposition to all forms of racism.

Yehuda Elkana, a child survivor of Auschwitz and former President of the Central European University spoke of

a profound existential “Angst” fed by a particular interpretation of the lessons of the holocaust … that we are the eternal victim. In this ancient belief … I see the tragic and paradoxical victory of Hitler. Two nations, metaphorically speaking, emerged from the ashes of Auschwitz: a minority who assert, “this must never happen again,” and a frightened and haunted majority who assert, “this must never happen to us again.”

Instead of fighting the terrorism that the British state created the Police are chasing political dissidents

The Metropolitan Police Used To Be Institutionally Anti-Semitic - Now It Supports Zionism – Nothing Much Has Changed

When anti-Semitism was prevalent in Britain it was also rife in the Met. During the 1930s there were even exchanges visits between the Nazi police and the Met. Today the Met is pro-Zionist. It is a change without a difference.

Anti-Semites have always supported Zionism as a means to get rid of the Jews in their midst. As A B Yehoshua, an Israeli novelist once said ‘Even today, in a perverse way, a real anti-Semite must be a Zionist.’  (Jewish Chronicle 22.1.82.)

That is why Tommy Robinson declared that he is a Zionist. That is why the neo-Nazi founder of the alt-right Richard Spencer, said he was a White Zionist. Every bigot and racist today loves Israel – from Marine Le Pen to the neo-Nazi AfD in Germany to Donald Trump. You are not alone Sir Mark.

Special Branch report – on a ‘Jew’ driving a car

In We Fight Fascists Daniel Sonabend, wrote about the 43 Group, which was formed by Jewish ex-servicemen in April 1946 to oppose the resurgence of fascist groups, led by Oswald Moseley. The reaction of the Police to them was extremely hostile. Genuine anti-Semitism not today’s false anti-Semitism has never bothered the Met.

Sonabend described the experiences of David Goldstein who was falsely arrested.

Four police officers leapt on him. He received several blows to the face and was knocked to the ground before being dragged to the nearest police car. The police later claimed Goldstein had provoked them by kicking the superintendent in the balls.

Accusing the victims of police violence of assault is something that Black people have a long experience of. Sonabend describes what happened at the police station.

they encountered the man Goldstein had reportedly attacked,... Superintendent Charles Satterthwaite. ‘Fucking Jew bastard’ Satterthwaite shouted at Silver as he repeatedly beat him, while two of his officers held Silver against the wall... Satterthwaite went for his face, which... was left ‘covered in a mass of blood.’

Satterthwaite was described by one Lennie Rolnick as ‘a first class anti-Semite who would have done well at Belsen.’

Anti-fascists were three times as likely to be arrested as fascists. Sonanbend concluded that ‘widespread anti-Semitism in the Metropolitan Police force’ was the explanation for this disparity in arrest rates. Sonanbend quotes Vidal Sassoon:

Two policemen held one of my comrades., Mo Levy, while a sergeant pounded him, beating him everywhere but the face, at the same time calling us ‘dirty Jew bastards’, ‘fucking Yids who Hitler missed’ and ‘sons of foreign whores.’

Sonanbend described the Met as an ‘institutionally anti-Semitic organisation.’ Ring any bells Sir Mark?

as well as being anti-Semitic and anti-communist, the police also harboured pro-fascist elements.’ ‘Many members of the Commercial Street Police Station ‘openly boast about being members of Jeffrey Hamm’s fascist party.

Metropolitan police assault pro Palestine campaigner Wasseem Yousuf

Nothing much has changed except for the victims. Instead of Jews it’s now Black people and Palestinian supporters like Wasseem Yousuf who are the victims of police violence.

This is outrageous! This is assault!

Earlier today, in Tower Hamlets, a Metropolitan Police officer attacked a pro-Palestine activist in broad daylight and front of numerous witnesses.

This officer must be suspended immediately. pic.twitter.com/kzEfjnG5MC

— Syed Siddiqi (@SiddiqiSyed) July 12, 2024

Thugs in uniform attacked Wasseem for the ‘offence’ of carrying a Palestine flag and like the East End Jews of 80 years ago was charged with assaulting the police. Habits die hard Sir Mark. Perjury is nothing new to the Police.

Why are the police targeting Waseem Yousaf?

There is a petition here that can be signed demanding that your thugs are suspended Sir Mark but it should not take a petition for you to do your duty.

The Met Have Decided that Comparing Israel to Nazi Germany is a Criminal Offence

You and the Met have taken it upon yourselves to decide what is and is not allowed to be said on the streets of London. You have become a political thought police.

You produced a 17 page Advice Sheet ‘Instructions about tackling the hate speech and actions by HAMAS supporters on the marches’. The title is instructive. Very few Palestinian protesters support Hamas. What we support is the right of the Palestinians, including Hamas, to resist  the violent and illegal occupation of Gaza by Israel.

Page16 of this sheet ‘Israeli Government/Nazism Comparisons’ says:

‘A particularly difficult areas is the comparison of either (a) the Israeli Government or the Israeli PM, Benjamin Netanyahu with (b) either Nazism or Hitler.’

Why is it so difficult? There is more than enough evidence to prove this. Nissim Vaturi, Deputy Speaker of the Knesset said that Israel needs to "separate the children and women and kill the adults in Gaza, we are being too considerate. Israeli Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich said it is moral to starve 2 million people to death. It is a difficulty of your own making.

The sheet speaks of ‘comparisons between the actions of the Israeli Government and the actions of the Nazis (i.e. the holocaust)’. I realise that police officers are not historians. That is why you should keep your nose out of historical disputation – you are not qualified to offer an opinion.

The holocaust began on 22 June 1941 with Operation Barbarossa, the invasion of Russia. The Nazi regime lasted from 1933-1941, so comparisons between the Nazis and the Israeli government/Zionists aren’t just about the holocaust.

Your advice sheet says that ‘There are also frequently oblique comparisons that relate to "genocide" or the phrase "never again.’ That is correct and the comparisons are not oblique. Israel’ attack on Gaza IS a genocide. The International Court of Justice in January 2024 ruled it was ‘plausible’ that a genocide was taking place. Every single human rights organisation from Amnesty International to Human Rights Watch believes that Israel is committing a genocide.

If you find calling Israel’s Genocide problematic then it is clear which side you are on. If Srebenica, with 8,000 dead was a genocide then Gaza with hundreds of thousands dead is certainly a genocide. It may be politically inconvenient for you and fellow war criminal Keir Starmer but that is tough. Any arrest you make as a result are political and unlawful.

The Advice Sheet also said that

These comparisons are particularly offensive as it likens the systematic extermination of over 6 million Jews with the military conduct of Israel in the Middle East.

To whom is it offensive? Jews? Many Jews see the parallels all too clearly. But even if Jews were to take offence, so what? Was Salman Rushdie’s Satanic Verses banned because it offended Muslims? It is clear where you are coming from.

In Redmond-Bate v DPP Stephen Sedley, a Jewish and later Court of Appeal judge, ruled that“Freedom only to speak inoffensively is not worth having.” I realise that you find concepts such as freedom of speech difficult to comprehend. The mindset of the average cop and free speech don’t make comfortable bedfellows.

I am therefore writing to you to demand that this Advice Sheet, especially page 16 on Nazi-Zionist comparisons is withdrawn as the advice in it isn’t worth a copper’s nark.

Over recent months you have displayed an increasing hostility to Palestine marches, starting with the banning of the march starting at the BBC on January 18. In my view the organisers should have ignored your dictats and told you to fuck off.

The Court of Appeal has now ruled that your powers to ban marches are less than you once thought. The last Conservative government was hostile to the idea of freedom of association and gave you enormous powers which you then abused.

However Sir Mark, not even the most reactionary and racist cop is beyond reform. I am therefore going to explain why it is that I said Israel is Hitler’s Bastard Offspring.

The IHRA ‘definition’ of anti-Semitism states that ‘Drawing comparisons of contemporary Israeli policy to that of the Nazis’ could be anti-Semitic. This has been widely criticised by leading lawyers and scholars. It was drawn up by the Zionist American Jewish Congress in order to conflate anti-Zionism and anti-Semitism. It is no surprise that the Met should adopt the IHRA, which isn’t even a definition.

Anti-Semitism is a very simple concept. It is ‘hostility to or prejudice against Jews as Jews.’ Anti-Semitism has nothing to do with opposition to Zionism or Israel whereas most anti-Semites love and always have loved Israel and Zionism.

The IHRA ‘definition’ states that it is ‘non-legally binding’. So why is the Met using it as if it had the force of law?

Why the Israeli State is ‘Hitler’s Bastard Offspring’ and Why Nazi-Zionist Comparisons are Legitimate.

1.          When Israel’s war on Gaza began, wanted war criminal Defence Minister Yoav Gallant, called the Palestinians ‘human animals.’ When Heinrich Himmler addressed senior SS Generals in Posnan on October 4 1943 he called all non-Aryans ‘human animals’.

2.          Comparisons between Israel and the Holocaust have been made by numerous holocaust survivors. They are in a better position to form a judgement than you.

3.          When Shlomo Shmelzman, a survivor of the Warsaw Ghetto, wrote a letter to the Israeli press announcing his hunger strike against the 1982 Lebanon War, he stated:

a.            In my childhood I have suffered fear, hunger and humiliation when I passed from the Warsaw Ghetto, through labor camps, to Buchenwald. Today, as a citizen of Israel, I cannot accept the systematic destruction of cities, towns, and refugee camps… I hear too many familiar sounds today…. I hear “dirty Arabs” and I remember “dirty Jews.” I hear about “closed areas” and I remember ghettos and camps. I hear “two-legged beasts” and I remember “Untermenschen.”… Too many things in Israel remind me of too many things from my childhood.

4.          Moshe Zimmerman, a Professor of German History at Tel Aviv University, compared the children of the Hebron settlers to those of the Hitler Youth.

5.          Lawrence Weschler, a contributor to The New Yorker, compared Gaza to Dachau before the Final Solution.

6.          Israeli psychologist Gavriel Solomon wrote that:

a.       The idea of Judenrein (Jew-free zone) or Arabrein is not new. . . . Some might say ‘how can you compare us to Nazis?’ I am not talking about the death camps, but about the year 1935. There were no camps yet, but there were racist laws. And we are heading forward toward these kinds of laws.

7.          Veronika Cohen, 80, a Holocaust survivor who was born in the ghetto in Budapest, said

“I don’t think we can remember our suffering without acknowledging the suffering of Gaza... To me, when I read the stories of their suffering in Gaza, it blends completely into how I feel about the Holocaust.”

8.          In the same article Ruth Vleeschhouwer Falak, 89, who survived the Nazi-occupation of the Netherlands as a child, said she was standing there because

“in the 1930s, if Germans had stood up loudly against the Nazi party, maybe they wouldn’t have been able to do what they did to us. Speaking up is not a choice for me.”

9.          Ilana Drukker Tokotin, 87, who spent her childhood hiding from the Nazis, said that

The saying is never again; that means never again for anybody. That’s really what we’re standing here for”

Stephen Kapos is 5th from the left

10.    More recently Stephen Kapos, a child survivor of the Nazi occupation of Hungary wrote that

a.            ‘Israel’s plan is to destroy Palestinian society in Gaza in order to force as many people as possible to leave. This policy has many differences from Nazi Germany’s plan to destroy Jewish society in Europe – but it also has many similarities. That is why, as a Holocaust survivor, I’ve felt compelled to join various pro-Palestine protests in London.

Recently you interviewed Stephen under caution. In the eyes of you and your officers even holocaust survivors are now criminals. Opposition to genocide is becoming an offence in London’s police state.

11.    Marika Sherwood, a holocaust survivor, academic and anti-racist was barred under the IHRA from giving a talk at Manchester University titled “You’re doing to the Palestinians what the Nazis did to me.” Israel’s war criminal Ambassador Mark Regev had objected to it.

Elad Barashi: "I can't understand the people here in the State of Israel who don't want to fill Gaza with gas showers... or train cars... and finish this story! Let there be a Holocaust in Gaza."https://t.co/5nE3mOw5yj

— Frank van der Linde (@frankvdlinde) May 6, 2025

12.    But it’s not only anti-Zionists who make the comparisons between Israel and the Nazis. It is the Hebron settlers who daub ‘Arabs to the gas chambers’ on a cemetery. Or it’s Elad Barashi, a television producer on Israel’s Channel 14 who wrote on Twitter: ‘Good morning, let there be a Shoah (Holocaust) in Gaza.’ In another post, he wrote,

"I can't understand the people here in the State of Israel who don't want to fill Gaza with gas showers... or train cars... and finish this story! Let there be a Holocaust in Gaza."

Sir Mark Rowley - A Very Sick Man

If you think that bombing hospitals and murdering thousands of children is ‘military conduct’ then you are a very sick man Sir Mark Rowley.

13.    You went out of your way in your advice sheet not to call what’s happening in Gaza a genocide. You referred instead to Israel’s ‘military conduct’.  If you think that bombing hospitals, murdering thousands of children, torturing prisoners, raping women is ‘military conduct’ then you are a very sick man Sir Mark.

Why this leading Israeli Holocaust scholar says it's a genocide in Gaza | The InnerView

14.    Israeli holocaust historians such as Shaiel Ben-Ephraim, Omar Bartov and Daniel Blatman accept that Israel’s actions in Gaza are genocidal. What expertise do you have? Over 55 scholars in holocaust and genocide studies signed a statement that said the same. Over 800 legal scholars said that Israel may be perpetrating the ‘crime of Genocide’ in Gaza. What expertise do you have? Being a bigot and a racist is not a qualification.

"Holocaust historians Daniel Blatman and Amos Goldberg drew chilling parallels in their piece titled 'Although what is happening in Gaza is not Auschwitz, it is of the same family - a crime of genocide'"

✍️ Opinion by Soumaya Ghannoushihttps://t.co/XCT56Rbppt

— Middle East Eye (@MiddleEastEye) January 21, 2025

So you see Sir Mark there are plenty of Jews who think Nazi-Zionist comparisons are valid in times of genocide. I don’t expect you to agree but that is what freedom of speech is all about. People having the right to say what they want to say without fear of arrest by thugs in uniform. If people take offense so what? People often find the truth offensive.

I realise that a policeman’s mind is a closed mind. You have chosen to keep company with and take counsel from the Zionist Board of Deputies, a group that represents barely 30% of British Jews. They have every right to their racist views. What they don’t have the right to expect is to have the Met become their enforcer. You don’t have the right to arrest those who disagree with your own anti-Palestinian racism.

Rowley’s response to Louise Casey's Report on Racism, Misogyny in the force

The Metropolitan Police’s Institutional Racism

The Met has been called ‘institutionally racist’ by the Stephen Lawrence inquiry and more recently by Baroness Casey’s review. The latter was commissioned after the murder of Sarah Everard by Wayne Couzens, who fellow officers called ‘the rapist’.

You promised to change the behaviour of your officers but given your own racism that is unlikely. Not only should you withdraw your ill-conceived advice sheet on what is anti-Semitic but you should also resign.

An institutionally racist organisation cannot cleanse itself of the stain of racism whilst it is headed by a racist. In your anti-Palestinian actions and behaviour you have proved that you are as bigoted as your predecessor Cressida Dick.

Yours sincerely,

Tony Greenstein