Showing posts with label Richard Spencer. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Richard Spencer. Show all posts

2 August 2025

Last Saturday and Last Night Hundreds of People Marched Against Starvation in Gaza and Left Pots & Pans Outside the Offices of Starmer Clone & MP for Hove, Peter Kyle

Last Sunday 50 Jews & Christians 4 Genocide Danced & Celebrated the Genocide Meeting With a Hostile Reception by Local People

Brighton PSC March Against Starvation in Gaza 27 July 25

Last Saturday hundreds of people took to the streets of Brighton and Hove banging pots and pans, as a reminder of Israel’s starvation of the people of Gaza. We marched from the main shopping centre, Churchill Square to Hove Town Hall. We stopped off at the office of Starmer stooge Peter Kyle where we left our empty pots and pans.

Unlike the Zionist march of 50, half of whom came from London,  the Brighton Palestine Solidarity march was massive stretching all the way down Western Road

Kyle was Vice Chair of Labour Friends of Genocide Israel. People sitting in restaurants applauded us along the way. A contrast with the reception a Zionist march the next day received when people catcalled these vile fascists. People like Heidi Bachram lurked in the shadows and Little Miss Hitler aka Victoria Bhogal led the dancing and singing.

Christians & Jews4Genocide Stage a March in Brighton in Support of Starving Palestinian Children

People were revulsed at these creatures, literally dancing on the graves of Gaza’s children and seeming to take pleasure in the fact that children in Gaza were slowly dying of starvation. It is a famine that Israel is 100% responsible for having maintained a hermetically sealed blockade of Gaza for 3 months.

Brighton's iconic  clocktower where marches often end up

These Zionists are totally amoral rancid creatures. They talk about anti-Semitism but in reality they resemble the Nazis they purport to oppose. Which is probably why leading neo-Nazis like Tommy Robinson and Richard Spencer to say nothing of the Chump himself, as so in love with the ‘Jewish’ State.

James a Christian Fascist Holocaust Denier gets nicked Trying to Disrupt a Sit-in @ Brighton Station

I am copying a long article below by Professor Daniel Blatman, a holocaust historian and researcher at the Hebrew University, Jerusalem. It is one of the best I have read on Zionist holocaust denial. He rightly compares it to the Turkish State’s denial of the Armenian holocaust and of course the denial of the Nazi holocaust.

We left a few pots and pans outside Kyle's office to remind him about the starvation of children that he and Sturmer have supported

Netanyahu has openly spoken about letting in the least aid that Israel can get away with. Bezalel Smotrich, Israel’s Finance Minister and the man responsible more than any for the survival of Israel’s coalition government as well as a ‘proud homophobe’ and self-declared fascist has openly spoken about how ‘moral’ it would be to starve 2 million people.

On Tuesday 17 June, after sending a letter to Starmer and copying in Peter Kyle ‘Kerry’ was arrested after former Councillor and Kyle aide Chris Henry contacted the Police. It was alleged she was anti-Semitic because she was anti-Israel. As if anyone with an ounce of humanity could be anything but hostile to the genocidal Israeli state. It seems that the criticism is getting Kyle down. As for the Police, they seem to think they are messenger boys for Starmer and the Israeli Embassy.

See Greg Hadfield’s ‘How Labour MP Peter Kyle triggered a 4am police raid on a constituent — for writing to him about Israel’s genocide’



On the right is Ivor Caplin, former Chair of the Jewish Labour Movement who was arrested in January this year in a sting by paedophile hunters after having tried to meet up with an underage boy - reputed to be Kyle's former boyfriend

Churchill Sq Demo & March to Peter Killer Kyle MP's Office & Hove Town Hall 26 July 25

What many people find difficult to understand is how those who lay claim to the holocaust as the justification for the very existence of the State of Israel can at one and the same time speak so openly about annihilating and exterminating the Palestinian people. No less than 47% of Israeli Jews, a plurality which becomes a majority if those who believe that the myth of Amalek is relevant today are included, want to see the extermination of the people of Gaza.

Zionists are the modern day Nazis - under Hitler disabled patients were starved to death - Israel has such good role models it's no wonder they collaborated with him at the time

There is also the attempt by the Zionists to counter the pictures of starving Palestinian children by alleging that they were all fake and that the children had ‘underlying health problems’.  Presumably it is fine if a child is ill anyway to deprive them of food too. This was precisely the Nazi attitude to the mentally and physically handicapped.

AUGUST 1 Hundreds Demonstrate Outside Peter 'Killer' Kyle MP Offices in Hove - NO STARVATION IN GAZA

Little Miss Hitler (Victoria Bhogal) Led the Child Killer March of the Zionists

The March of the Zionist Baby Killers 27 July 25

Hitler called them ‘useless eaters’. It is remarkable how the Zionists are following in the footsteps of those who carried out the holocaust of Jews. It is almost as if the Zionists cannot help themselves when they imitate the arguments of those who they purport to oppose.

Prime amongst these genocide denial propagandists is Israeli ‘researcher' David Collier who poses as an independent investigator but is a far-right Zionist. I have footage of him in a debate with David Hirsh and other far-right Zionists in which he refers to Palestinians as ‘it’ and denies there’s any such thing as Palestinian refugees.

In the wake of the Zionists' March for Genocide the local Argus was filled with letters of disgust from those who don't appreciate Jewish holocaust deniers

The Zionists Run Into Public Hostility - They Can't Imagine Why People Don't Like Starving Children

Zionists can only mirror Nazi ideology because they have depoliticised the Nazis and the Holocaust. Instead of economic, political, social and psychological explanations, the Nazis are treated as demonic by the Zionists. They hated Jews because they were Jews. That’s it, no other reasons. They were beyond history.

The Empty Pots and Pans Symbolise the Empty Stomachs in  Gaza - Protest August 1st


The Nazis’ anti-communism, belief that women’s place was in the home, hatred of gays and sexual minorities as well as their contempt for indigenous people, including Arabs, is eliminated. Zionist holocaust historians strip the Nazis of any explanation based on eugenics and the need for racial breeding or improvement.  The best representative of this was Yehuda Bauer of the Hebrew University. For him the only victims of the holocaust were Jews.

This is why all the familiar Nazi phrases about lebensraum (living space) or racial cleansing keep cropping up in Zionist debate and argument. Israeli government ministers have repeatedly talked about ‘cleansing’ Gaza. Racial cleansing was integral to Nazi eugenics and it is equally applicable to Zionist ethnic cleansing.


Zionists Face Public Hostility As They March in Support of Starving Children It Must Be Antisemitism

In her book Eichmann in Jerusalem – The Banality of Evil Hannah Arendt noted the hypocrisy with which the prosecution attacked the Nazi’s Nuremberg Laws of 1935 which stripped German Jews of  German nationality and citizenship. ‘There was certainly something breathtaking’ Arendt wrote

in the naivete with which the prosecution denounced the infamous Nuremberg Laws of 1935 which had prohibited intermarriage and sexual intercourse between Germans and Jews. The better informed among the correspondents were well aware of the irony but they did not mention it in their reports.’

The irony Arendt was referring to was the fact that ‘Israeli  citizens – religious and nonreligious – seemed agreed upon the desirability of having a law which prohibits intermarriage.’ (p.8)

Daniel Blatman in The Victim Identity Israel Built Over Generations Now Fuels Its Denial of Genocide in Gaza, notes as I did in my previous blog, the role of Yad Vashem, Israel’s holocaust museum, in refusing to speak out about the current genocide or indeed say anything about the plethora of genocidal statements that Israeli politicians have made.

Yad Vashem’s only role is to safeguard the memory of the Holocaust as the exclusive property of Jews as its former Chairman, Avner Shalev, admits. No one else died because of their biological inheritance. Only the Jews suffered a genocide. The Roma, the Disabled, the Poles and Russians, are simply invisible in Zionist historiography. Only Jewish blood counts.


This is the victim centred discourse that is at the centre of Zionist justifications for the barbarities in Gaza today. The holocaust of the Jews justifies the holocaust of the Palestinians. And the Holocaust Industry nods its head.


In Britain Karen Pollock of the Holocaust Educational Trust is one of the principal exponents of the idea that the Holocaust or Shoah as Israel calls it, should be reserved solely for Jewish victims of the Nazis. If, God forbid, anyone should include the Palestinians, then that is anti-Semitic in itself.



In an article Holocaust Memorial Day should only be about the Shoah Pollock writes in the Jewish Chronicle (where else?) of ‘our duty to remember the Holocaust’ and warns against

‘attempts to dilute this crucial mission, to make the day less “exclusive”, broadening its scope in a way that risks eroding the uniquely Jewish experience of the Holocaust and to erase antisemitism from the narrative of the day.

In Pollock’s eyes including any other victims of genocide or holocausts is to ‘dilute’ the meaning of holocaust memorial and Holocaust Memorial Day. Why? Because the unique victimhood of Jews in her eyes is a precondition of the victimhood that Israel claims for itself even whilst it  murders and burns alive children in Gaza. The Holocaust has become Israel’s prime justification even whilst Israeli society becomes genocidal en masse.

It is another of life’s ironies that anti-Semitism in Germany was never respectable. Hitler played down his anti-Semitism in the three years leading up his accession to power. The Nazis worked hard to try and convince Germans of the merits of anti-Semitism and never succeeded in fully accomplishing the task of ideological indoctrination.

That is one reason why the Holocaust was kept a close state secret and when Nazi leaders spoke of the extermination of the Jews they used euphemisms such as ‘special measures’ or indeed Final Solution, even amongst themselves. They were never able to justify the annihilation of the Jews and Roma, still less the handicapped openly.

Contrast that with Israelis who openly boast of the delight they take in raping, torturing and murdering Palestinians. Israel has become a genocidal nation, an anti-nation. It is a nation bound only by its hatred of the other. That is why I reject the argument of some Israeli Marxists and Trotskyists that there is a separate Israeli nation alongside the Palestinians.

The Independent reported that Pollock had

‘made it clear she is particularly angry about the language and symbols on protests against Israel and the war in Gaza following Hamas’s attack on the state on 7 October last year.... Ms Pollock warned that the distortion of language about the Holocaust as a means to attack Israel is putting democratic values at risk.’


Demonstration Outside the Offices of Peter 'Killer' Kyle MP on August 1st

Karen Pollock, like most Zionists, is not endowed with intelligence or rational thinking. When arguments of kith and kin take over your thinking then this encourages sloppy and lazy reasoning. Pointing out that Israelis calling for the extermination of the Palestinians are similar to Nazis who did the same to Jews is putting democracy at risk!! The ability to twist and distort concepts such as democracy to fit in with Jewish Supremacy is the only thing that Zionists like Pollock are skilled at.

Yet if Pollock and Zionism’s propagandists are scribes who repeat cliche’s that they have learnt by rote from an Israeli Embassy crib sheet, words without meaning, then Professor Yehuda Elkana, the former Rector of the Central University in Budapest, (before Netanyahu’s anti-Semitic friend Viktor Orban shut it down) was the opposite. Elkana was a deeply thoughtful man.

Elkana was also a child survivor of Auschwitz. On 2nd March 1988 he wrote a famous article on The Need to Forget the holocaust. Elkana argued that the memorialisation of the holocaust in the way it is done in Israel was endangering not enhancing democracy. He wrote:

Demonstration Outside the Offices of Peter 'Killer' Kyle MP on August 1st

The very existence of democracy is endangered when the memory of the dead participates actively in the democratic process. Fascist regimes understood this very well and acted on it. We understand it today, and it is no accident that many studies of Nazi Germany deal with the political mythology of the Third Reich. Relying on the lessons of the past in order to build the future, exploiting past suffering as a political argument - these mean involving the dead in the political life of the living.

Thomas Jefferson once wrote that democracy and worship of the past are incompatible. Democracy fosters the present and the future. Too much of "Zechor!" (Remember) and an addiction. to the past undermine the foundations of democracy.

The Zionists are now trying to pretend that there's no starvation in Gaza - that all the children dying had 'underlying health conditions' - like the Nazis they are they don't believe those who might already be ill        should be fed - strange that their bones are all showing

Elkana warned against the permanent victim status that fuels the holocaust in Gaza speaking of

a profound existential “Angst” fed by a particular interpretation of the lessons of the holocaust … that we are the eternal victim. In this ancient belief… I see the tragic and paradoxical victory of Hitler. Two nations, metaphorically speaking, emerged from the ashes of Auschwitz: a minority who assert, “this must never happen again,” and a frightened and haunted majority who assert, “this must never happen to us again.”

Demonstration Outside the Offices of Peter 'Killer' Kyle MP on August 1st

There are a number of things we can do practically. One is to rid institutions of the IHRA definition of anti-Semitism which is a device to brand the struggle of the indigenous Palestinians as anti-Semitic. It defames anti-colonial struggles. It says any comparisons between Zionism, Israel and Nazism is automatically anti-Semitic as is any description of the Israeli settler colonial process or the establishment of a ‘Jewish’ state.

Demonstration Outside the Offices of Peter 'Killer' Kyle MP on August 1st

It is no wonder that the British Establishment have taken it to their heart. The Police have adopted it as a means of prosecuting Palestine solidarity activists. What is baffling is how the academic prostitutes who run universities, the Vice-Chancellors who betray the very notion of academic freedom, have adopted this illiterate jumble of words which have no coherent theme apart from an automatic defence of Israel.

The Empty Pots and Pans Symbolise the Empty Stomachs in  Gaza - Protest August 1st

As Stephen Sedley, the Jewish former Court of Appeal Judge wrote in Defining Anti-Semitism, the IHRA being indefinite isn’t even a definition. Professor Geoffrey Alderman, one of the few honest Zionists (which is why he was banned from its pages, after being a Jewish Chronicle columnist for 14 years) described it as ‘flawed and faulty’  and that its 11 examples of anti-Semitism ‘embed(ed) numerous internal contradictions’.

We should also campaign for states to break their ties with the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance as Brazil has done. That is a concrete step which is of some use unlike the utterly pathetic ‘recognition’ of a Palestinian state that doesn’t exist.

As Hussein Agha and Robert Malley argue, recognition of a Palestinian state that doesn’t exist is a distraction from the main task of ending the genocide in Gaza.

Tony Greenstein

Posted by at 8 comments:
Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

11 May 2025

An Open Letter to the Metropolitan Police’s Racist Anti-Palestinian Commissioner, Mark Rowley

You Have Done Your Best To Ban Demonstrations Against Gaza’s Genocide – Using Jews As Your Moral Alibi – That Makes You Not the Protesters anti-Semitic

Emailed to:  mark.rowley@met.police.uk

Dear Sir Mark Rowley,

You do not know me. I am just one of the thousands who have been wrongfully arrested by your officers.

The Battle of Cable Street

On October 4th 2024, the 88th anniversary of the Battle of Cable Street, when the Met tried to batter their way through 200,000 anti-fascists in order to allow supporters of the British Union of Fascists to march through the Jewish East End, I was arrested at the Swiss Cottage demonstration against Israel’s racist and genocidal Ambassador Tzipi Hotoveli. I was accused of having committed a ‘racially aggravated offence’.

My ‘crime’ was having compared the Israeli state to Nazi Germany. I cited an article in which I compared the Nazi holocaust to the Israeli holocaust.



Tony Greenstein arrested for his speech outside the residence of Israels Ambassador Tzipi Hotoveli

On 13th November I was informed that you would not be charging me. My arrest was thus unlawful. I told your officers that I was disappointed that I could not challenge in court your attack on freedom of speech and your belief that policing political speech is part of the Met’s duties.

I know that people in your position have no sense of irony but arresting Jewish people for anti-Semitism is like awarding Henry Kissinger the Nobel Peace Prize.

Tony Greenstein Speech in Liverpool 12 January 2025 at Palestine Solidarity Demo

You have made it clear that that the only Jews who count are racists and Zionists. Anti-Zionist and anti-racist Jews are invisible because we refuse to be the moral alibi for the British government’s complicity in the Genocide in Gaza.

The constant theme when banning Palestinian demonstrations is that solidarity with Palestine is inherently anti-Jewish. That’s why on December 7 your officers surrounded the Jewish Bloc in order to ‘protect’ them from other marchers!

You have now abused your powers once again to ban the demonstration against Israel’s Ambassador over a large part of North London. The pretext is that it’s a ‘Jewish’ area despite only 8.5% of Swiss Cottage residents being Jewish. Again the assumption is that Jews support Genocide. If anyone Sir Mark is an anti-Semite it is you.

It is time that you got it through your thick head that not all Jews support Zionism, Israeli Genocide. Historically Jews have been in the forefront of opposition to racism & fascism.

Mark Rowley's Police State in Action - Demonstrations on Palestine are Banned from the Area in Red

Today there is a growing Jewish revolt against Israel’s neo-Nazi politics of ethnic cleansing. People realise that one of the lessons of the Holocaust is opposition to all forms of racism.

Yehuda Elkana, a child survivor of Auschwitz and former President of the Central European University spoke of

a profound existential “Angst” fed by a particular interpretation of the lessons of the holocaust … that we are the eternal victim. In this ancient belief … I see the tragic and paradoxical victory of Hitler. Two nations, metaphorically speaking, emerged from the ashes of Auschwitz: a minority who assert, “this must never happen again,” and a frightened and haunted majority who assert, “this must never happen to us again.”

Instead of fighting the terrorism that the British state created the Police are chasing political dissidents

The Metropolitan Police Used To Be Institutionally Anti-Semitic - Now It Supports Zionism – Nothing Much Has Changed

When anti-Semitism was prevalent in Britain it was also rife in the Met. During the 1930s there were even exchanges visits between the Nazi police and the Met. Today the Met is pro-Zionist. It is a change without a difference.

Anti-Semites have always supported Zionism as a means to get rid of the Jews in their midst. As A B Yehoshua, an Israeli novelist once said ‘Even today, in a perverse way, a real anti-Semite must be a Zionist.’  (Jewish Chronicle 22.1.82.)

That is why Tommy Robinson declared that he is a Zionist. That is why the neo-Nazi founder of the alt-right Richard Spencer, said he was a White Zionist. Every bigot and racist today loves Israel – from Marine Le Pen to the neo-Nazi AfD in Germany to Donald Trump. You are not alone Sir Mark.

Special Branch report – on a ‘Jew’ driving a car

In We Fight Fascists Daniel Sonabend, wrote about the 43 Group, which was formed by Jewish ex-servicemen in April 1946 to oppose the resurgence of fascist groups, led by Oswald Moseley. The reaction of the Police to them was extremely hostile. Genuine anti-Semitism not today’s false anti-Semitism has never bothered the Met.

Sonabend described the experiences of David Goldstein who was falsely arrested.



Four police officers leapt on him. He received several blows to the face and was knocked to the ground before being dragged to the nearest police car. The police later claimed Goldstein had provoked them by kicking the superintendent in the balls.

Accusing the victims of police violence of assault is something that Black people have a long experience of. Sonabend describes what happened at the police station.

they encountered the man Goldstein had reportedly attacked,... Superintendent Charles Satterthwaite. ‘Fucking Jew bastard’ Satterthwaite shouted at Silver as he repeatedly beat him, while two of his officers held Silver against the wall... Satterthwaite went for his face, which... was left ‘covered in a mass of blood.’




Satterthwaite was described by one Lennie Rolnick as ‘a first class anti-Semite who would have done well at Belsen.’

Anti-fascists were three times as likely to be arrested as fascists. Sonanbend concluded that ‘widespread anti-Semitism in the Metropolitan Police force’ was the explanation for this disparity in arrest rates. Sonanbend quotes Vidal Sassoon:

Two policemen held one of my comrades., Mo Levy, while a sergeant pounded him, beating him everywhere but the face, at the same time calling us ‘dirty Jew bastards’, ‘fucking Yids who Hitler missed’ and ‘sons of foreign whores.’

Sonanbend described the Met as an ‘institutionally anti-Semitic organisation.’ Ring any bells Sir Mark?

as well as being anti-Semitic and anti-communist, the police also harboured pro-fascist elements.’ ‘Many members of the Commercial Street Police Station ‘openly boast about being members of Jeffrey Hamm’s fascist party.

Metropolitan police assault pro Palestine campaigner Wasseem Yousuf

Nothing much has changed except for the victims. Instead of Jews it’s now Black people and Palestinian supporters like Wasseem Yousuf who are the victims of police violence.



Thugs in uniform attacked Wasseem for the ‘offence’ of carrying a Palestine flag and like the East End Jews of 80 years ago was charged with assaulting the police. Habits die hard Sir Mark. Perjury is nothing new to the Police.

Why are the police targeting Waseem Yousaf?

There is a petition here that can be signed demanding that your thugs are suspended Sir Mark but it should not take a petition for you to do your duty.

The Met Have Decided that Comparing Israel to Nazi Germany is a Criminal Offence

You and the Met have taken it upon yourselves to decide what is and is not allowed to be said on the streets of London. You have become a political thought police.

You produced a 17 page Advice Sheet ‘Instructions about tackling the hate speech and actions by HAMAS supporters on the marches’. The title is instructive. Very few Palestinian protesters support Hamas. What we support is the right of the Palestinians, including Hamas, to resist  the violent and illegal occupation of Gaza by Israel.

Page16 of this sheet ‘Israeli Government/Nazism Comparisons’ says:

‘A particularly difficult areas is the comparison of either (a) the Israeli Government or the Israeli PM, Benjamin Netanyahu with (b) either Nazism or Hitler.’

Why is it so difficult? There is more than enough evidence to prove this. Nissim Vaturi, Deputy Speaker of the Knesset said that Israel needs to "separate the children and women and kill the adults in Gaza, we are being too considerate. Israeli Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich said it is moral to starve 2 million people to death. It is a difficulty of your own making.

The sheet speaks of ‘comparisons between the actions of the Israeli Government and the actions of the Nazis (i.e. the holocaust)’. I realise that police officers are not historians. That is why you should keep your nose out of historical disputation – you are not qualified to offer an opinion.

The holocaust began on 22 June 1941 with Operation Barbarossa, the invasion of Russia. The Nazi regime lasted from 1933-1941, so comparisons between the Nazis and the Israeli government/Zionists aren’t just about the holocaust.

Your advice sheet says that ‘There are also frequently oblique comparisons that relate to "genocide" or the phrase "never again.’ That is correct and the comparisons are not oblique. Israel’ attack on Gaza IS a genocide. The International Court of Justice in January 2024 ruled it was ‘plausible’ that a genocide was taking place. Every single human rights organisation from Amnesty International to Human Rights Watch believes that Israel is committing a genocide.

If you find calling Israel’s Genocide problematic then it is clear which side you are on. If Srebenica, with 8,000 dead was a genocide then Gaza with hundreds of thousands dead is certainly a genocide. It may be politically inconvenient for you and fellow war criminal Keir Starmer but that is tough. Any arrest you make as a result are political and unlawful.

The Advice Sheet also said that

These comparisons are particularly offensive as it likens the systematic extermination of over 6 million Jews with the military conduct of Israel in the Middle East.

To whom is it offensive? Jews? Many Jews see the parallels all too clearly. But even if Jews were to take offence, so what? Was Salman Rushdie’s Satanic Verses banned because it offended Muslims? It is clear where you are coming from.

In Redmond-Bate v DPP Stephen Sedley, a Jewish and later Court of Appeal judge, ruled that“Freedom only to speak inoffensively is not worth having.” I realise that you find concepts such as freedom of speech difficult to comprehend. The mindset of the average cop and free speech don’t make comfortable bedfellows.

I am therefore writing to you to demand that this Advice Sheet, especially page 16 on Nazi-Zionist comparisons is withdrawn as the advice in it isn’t worth a copper’s nark.

Over recent months you have displayed an increasing hostility to Palestine marches, starting with the banning of the march starting at the BBC on January 18. In my view the organisers should have ignored your dictats and told you to fuck off.

The Court of Appeal has now ruled that your powers to ban marches are less than you once thought. The last Conservative government was hostile to the idea of freedom of association and gave you enormous powers which you then abused.

However Sir Mark, not even the most reactionary and racist cop is beyond reform. I am therefore going to explain why it is that I said Israel is Hitler’s Bastard Offspring.

The IHRA ‘definition’ of anti-Semitism states that ‘Drawing comparisons of contemporary Israeli policy to that of the Nazis’ could be anti-Semitic. This has been widely criticised by leading lawyers and scholars. It was drawn up by the Zionist American Jewish Congress in order to conflate anti-Zionism and anti-Semitism. It is no surprise that the Met should adopt the IHRA, which isn’t even a definition.

Anti-Semitism is a very simple concept. It is ‘hostility to or prejudice against Jews as Jews.’ Anti-Semitism has nothing to do with opposition to Zionism or Israel whereas most anti-Semites love and always have loved Israel and Zionism.

The IHRA ‘definition’ states that it is ‘non-legally binding’. So why is the Met using it as if it had the force of law?

Why the Israeli State is ‘Hitler’s Bastard Offspring’ and Why Nazi-Zionist Comparisons are Legitimate.

1.          When Israel’s war on Gaza began, wanted war criminal Defence Minister Yoav Gallant, called the Palestinians ‘human animals.’ When Heinrich Himmler addressed senior SS Generals in Posnan on October 4 1943 he called all non-Aryans ‘human animals’.

2.          Comparisons between Israel and the Holocaust have been made by numerous holocaust survivors. They are in a better position to form a judgement than you.

3.          When Shlomo Shmelzman, a survivor of the Warsaw Ghetto, wrote a letter to the Israeli press announcing his hunger strike against the 1982 Lebanon War, he stated:

a.            In my childhood I have suffered fear, hunger and humiliation when I passed from the Warsaw Ghetto, through labor camps, to Buchenwald. Today, as a citizen of Israel, I cannot accept the systematic destruction of cities, towns, and refugee camps… I hear too many familiar sounds today…. I hear “dirty Arabs” and I remember “dirty Jews.” I hear about “closed areas” and I remember ghettos and camps. I hear “two-legged beasts” and I remember “Untermenschen.”… Too many things in Israel remind me of too many things from my childhood.

4.          Moshe Zimmerman, a Professor of German History at Tel Aviv University, compared the children of the Hebron settlers to those of the Hitler Youth.

5.          Lawrence Weschler, a contributor to The New Yorker, compared Gaza to Dachau before the Final Solution.

6.          Israeli psychologist Gavriel Solomon wrote that:

a.       The idea of Judenrein (Jew-free zone) or Arabrein is not new. . . . Some might say ‘how can you compare us to Nazis?’ I am not talking about the death camps, but about the year 1935. There were no camps yet, but there were racist laws. And we are heading forward toward these kinds of laws.

7.          Veronika Cohen, 80, a Holocaust survivor who was born in the ghetto in Budapest, said

“I don’t think we can remember our suffering without acknowledging the suffering of Gaza... To me, when I read the stories of their suffering in Gaza, it blends completely into how I feel about the Holocaust.”

8.          In the same article Ruth Vleeschhouwer Falak, 89, who survived the Nazi-occupation of the Netherlands as a child, said she was standing there because

“in the 1930s, if Germans had stood up loudly against the Nazi party, maybe they wouldn’t have been able to do what they did to us. Speaking up is not a choice for me.”

9.          Ilana Drukker Tokotin, 87, who spent her childhood hiding from the Nazis, said that

The saying is never again; that means never again for anybody. That’s really what we’re standing here for”

Stephen Kapos is 5th from the left

10.    More recently Stephen Kapos, a child survivor of the Nazi occupation of Hungary wrote that

a.            ‘Israel’s plan is to destroy Palestinian society in Gaza in order to force as many people as possible to leave. This policy has many differences from Nazi Germany’s plan to destroy Jewish society in Europe – but it also has many similarities. That is why, as a Holocaust survivor, I’ve felt compelled to join various pro-Palestine protests in London.

Recently you interviewed Stephen under caution. In the eyes of you and your officers even holocaust survivors are now criminals. Opposition to genocide is becoming an offence in London’s police state.

11.    Marika Sherwood, a holocaust survivor, academic and anti-racist was barred under the IHRA from giving a talk at Manchester University titled “You’re doing to the Palestinians what the Nazis did to me.” Israel’s war criminal Ambassador Mark Regev had objected to it.


12.    But it’s not only anti-Zionists who make the comparisons between Israel and the Nazis. It is the Hebron settlers who daub ‘Arabs to the gas chambers’ on a cemetery. Or it’s Elad Barashi, a television producer on Israel’s Channel 14 who wrote on Twitter: ‘Good morning, let there be a Shoah (Holocaust) in Gaza.’ In another post, he wrote,

"I can't understand the people here in the State of Israel who don't want to fill Gaza with gas showers... or train cars... and finish this story! Let there be a Holocaust in Gaza."

Sir Mark Rowley - A Very Sick Man

If you think that bombing hospitals and murdering thousands of children is ‘military conduct’ then you are a very sick man Sir Mark Rowley.

13.    You went out of your way in your advice sheet not to call what’s happening in Gaza a genocide. You referred instead to Israel’s ‘military conduct’.  If you think that bombing hospitals, murdering thousands of children, torturing prisoners, raping women is ‘military conduct’ then you are a very sick man Sir Mark.

Why this leading Israeli Holocaust scholar says it's a genocide in Gaza | The InnerView


14.    Israeli holocaust historians such as Shaiel Ben-Ephraim, Omar Bartov and Daniel Blatman accept that Israel’s actions in Gaza are genocidal. What expertise do you have? Over 55 scholars in holocaust and genocide studies signed a statement that said the same. Over 800 legal scholars said that Israel may be perpetrating the ‘crime of Genocide’ in Gaza. What expertise do you have? Being a bigot and a racist is not a qualification.


So you see Sir Mark there are plenty of Jews who think Nazi-Zionist comparisons are valid in times of genocide. I don’t expect you to agree but that is what freedom of speech is all about. People having the right to say what they want to say without fear of arrest by thugs in uniform. If people take offense so what? People often find the truth offensive.

I realise that a policeman’s mind is a closed mind. You have chosen to keep company with and take counsel from the Zionist Board of Deputies, a group that represents barely 30% of British Jews. They have every right to their racist views. What they don’t have the right to expect is to have the Met become their enforcer. You don’t have the right to arrest those who disagree with your own anti-Palestinian racism.

Rowley’s response to Louise Casey's Report on Racism, Misogyny in the force

The Metropolitan Police’s Institutional Racism

The Met has been called ‘institutionally racist’ by the Stephen Lawrence inquiry and more recently by Baroness Casey’s review. The latter was commissioned after the murder of Sarah Everard by Wayne Couzens, who fellow officers called ‘the rapist’.

You promised to change the behaviour of your officers but given your own racism that is unlikely. Not only should you withdraw your ill-conceived advice sheet on what is anti-Semitic but you should also resign.

An institutionally racist organisation cannot cleanse itself of the stain of racism whilst it is headed by a racist. In your anti-Palestinian actions and behaviour you have proved that you are as bigoted as your predecessor Cressida Dick.

Yours sincerely,

Tony Greenstein

Posted by at 6 comments:
Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)