 |
| One of the myths of Israel's right is that the Supreme Court is a liberal Arabist institution - whereas it has presided over waves of confiscations and expulsions |
Noone should be surprised that
‘the only democracy in the Middle East’ is fast jetissoning even the
pretensions of being a democratic state.
The dictatorship that is the Occupation is rapidly coming home as
dissident NGO’s, even the pro-Zionist
Btselem find their funding under attack.
NGO’s will only be able to
receive funding from outside Israel with the permission of the government. Meanwhile Sheldon Adelson’s free paper Israel Hayom, which is
subsidised to the tune of $5 million by an
American/Zionist billionaire will be protected, even though it is
destroying the rest of Israel’s independent media.
 |
| Right-wing Israeli NGO |
Israeli hasbara has
been going into overtime this week against the group Breaking the Silence,
which recorded and publicised the stories of soldiers detailing what really
happened in Gaza, the free-fire zones where civilians could be shot without
hesitation and the collapse of any semblance of moral values. The reaction has been to accuse Breaking the
Silence of lying, being anti-Semitic (of course!), self-hating Jews etc.
etc. Shoot the messenger rather than
deal with the message is the order of the day.
 |
| Ayelet Shaked - the 'angel of death' genocidalist and spearheading attack on human rights NGO's as 'justice' minister |
Ayelet Shaked, who is on record
as advocating the genocide of Palestinian people (or ‘little snakes’ as she
terms Palestinian infants) has been appointed ‘Justice’ Minister. It’s on a par with the decision to award the
Nobel Peace Prize to Henry Kissinger at the time of the Vietnam War.
 |
| Protest against Israeli apartheid outside new housing block within Arab East Jerusalem |
She has Israel’s Supreme Court
in her sights. This is a favourite
target of the far-Right. The Supreme
Court has an appalling enough record when it comes to Palestinian rights as it
is. It has ruled that Israeli law trumps
International law. It has given the go
ahead for land confiscations, the demolition of villages and much else. It has a grisly record of deferring to
‘security’ concerns and it is always cognisant of the need to uphold Zionist
values (such as ruling that there can be no such thing as a common Israeli
Nationality). Nonetheless, the few
liberal decisions it has made have proved irksome for the ‘democratic’ tyrants
now ruling Israel.
Tony Greenstein
 |
| B'tselem visiting Arab farmer whose crops have been destroyed by settlers - Btselem, although a Zionist group, has been under consistent attack |
6 June 2015
The Israeli government has indicated it is preparing to
take a hard line against human rights groups, the media and Supreme Court
Middle East Eye – 6 June 2015
 |
| The Israeli Right objects to foreign funding of NGOs - but not foreign aid for weaponry! |
A month into resuming his premiership, Benjamin
Netanyahu has been accused of an increasingly autocratic rule, as critics warn
that his new government is preparing to take a draconian line against Israeli
institutions opposing its policies.
 |
| Despite its appalling record Israel's Supreme Court under Justice Miriam Naor is under attack from Shaked for not being even more right-wing |
Israel’s new rightwing coalition has already indicated
it will make a priority of tackling three fronts – human rights organisations,
the media and the Supreme Court. All repeatedly clashed with Netanyahu during
his previous terms in office.
The leader of the parliamentary opposition, Isaac
Herzog, sounded the alarm last month, cautioning Netanyahu not to “raise a
hand” against the judiciary, media or the country’s minorities, including its
1.5 million Palestinian citizens. Netanyahu, he added, appeared to have learnt
“tricks” from the region’s dictators.
Long-time observers of Israeli politics also fear that
the current narrow right-wing coalition will give the prime minister a much
freer hand. In his two earlier governments, Netanyahu depended on the support
of centrist parties, such as Labor and Yesh Atid. Now he faces no such
constraints.
After Netanyahu awarded himself new powers to veto
legislation this week, Dov Khenin, the only Jewish member of the Arab-led Joint
List party in the Israeli parliament, or Knesset, wondered: “Are we for
autocracy?”
Similarly, Uri Avnery, leader of the Gush Shalom peace
movement and a former Knesset member, concluded in a recent column entitled
“Who will save Israel?” that: “The extreme right has found its self-assurance,
and is determined to use its power.”
Concerns mount
Causes for concern have quickly mounted.
They have included the announcement of a government bill
to penalise human rights groups working to help Palestinians in the occupied
territories, as well as to protect the rights of the large Palestinian minority
inside Israel and of African asylum seekers.
In addition, a diplomatic source told Middle East Eye
that behind the scenes Israeli officials are trying to browbeat European
governments into ending funding for the Israeli human rights community.
Eyebrows have also been raised by Netanyahu’s decision
to reserve the communications ministry, which regulates the media, for himself.
This is despite his having a shortage of ministerial posts with which to reward
coalition partners.
Analysts have warned that Netanyahu is preparing to
intimidate parts of the media critical of him and shore up the position of
Israel Hayom, a free daily that has become the biggest-circulation national
newspaper. Owned by US casino billionaire Sheldon Adelson, the paper staunchly
supports Netanyahu.
Meanwhile, there are fears that the Israeli Supreme
Court, which repeatedly came to blows with Netanyahu’s last government over
efforts to jail and deport asylum seekers, is in his sights as well.
The prime minister agreed to appoint Ayelet Shaked, of
the pro-settler Jewish Home party, as justice minister. Shaked has been a
fierce critic of the court, and has previously tried to introduce legislation
to neuter it.
“Netanyahu has good as declared war on dissent, whether
it’s from human rights organisations or the media,” said Jafar Farah, director
of Mossawa, an advocacy group for Israel’s Palestinian minority.
Israel ‘not perfect’
Netanyahu has defended his record against such charges.
Following criticism from US President Barack Obama that
his security worldview assumed only the “worst possibilities”, he said on
Thursday: “Israel isn’t perfect, but it is on a level with the world’s great
democracies and it faces challenges that are much more difficult.”
He added that his government had invested heavily
in helping Israel’s Palestinian minority, and he promised to preserve the
independence of the Supreme Court, while stressing that his intention was only
to open up the media to greater competition, not to control it.
“I believe in competition in products, in goods and also
in ideas,” he told a press conference.
But critics are not reassured.
A European diplomat in Jerusalem told MEE that Israel
had been waging an aggressive campaign in capitals across Europe to persuade
them to stop funding human rights groups in Israel.
“The pressure being exerted on us behind the scenes is
intense,” said the source, who wished not to be named, given the issue’s
sensitivity.
The diplomat added that Israel wanted in particular to
silence Israeli groups whose work might encourage a growing international
boycott campaign or assist investigations by the International Criminal Court,
which the Palestinians officially joined in April.
The diplomat indicated that B’Tselem and Breaking the
Silence – both of which highlight human rights abuses and are funded by
European governments – were top of Israel’s hit-list.
Row over soldiers’ testimony
The tensions exploded into public view this week when
Israel’s foreign ministry opened a rift with Switzerland over its support for
an exhibition by Breaking the Silence.
Yigal Caspi, Israel’s ambassador to Switzerland,
denounced the exhibition in Zurich as “slander” for featuring photographs and
testimonies from Israeli soldiers alleging violations of Palestinian human
rights.
Caspi demanded that the Swiss government immediately
stop funding the exhibition. Israel has previously demanded that Britain, the
Netherlands, Spain and Denmark also end their support for the group.
The row was immediately followed by a decision from the
culture ministry to pull funding from a dance show due to open in Tel Aviv that
incorporates video clips from the occupied territories taken by B’Tselem.
Tzipi Hotovely, Netanyahu’s deputy in the foreign
ministry, warned on Tuesday that the government would “act
against groups that operate against Israel from within the country and abroad”.
Breaking the Silence responded by criticising the
government’s “anti-democratic campaign”.
NGO bill in pipeline
The clash with Switzerland looked like the opening round
in a more comprehensive move to muzzle human rights groups, said Rina
Rosenberg, the head of advocacy at Adalah, a legal centre for Israel’s
Palestinian citizens.
“The direction this government appears to be heading in
is a cause for great concern,” she told MEE. “It looks like we are in for a big
fight.”
The coalition parties specified in their agreement last
month that they would advance what is being dubbed an “NGO bill”, targeting
groups seen as left-wing and pro-Palestinian. Shaked, the new justice minister,
is the driving force behind the measure.
According to Israeli media, the bill is likely to
require NGOs to seek the approval of the defence and foreign ministries over
funding they receive from foreign governments – a move that is expected to
apply to human rights and pro-Palestinian groups exclusively.
If such legislation passes, most of these groups would
struggle to survive financially, said Rosenberg.
In the previous Knesset, Netanyahu’s government tried to
pass legislation against human rights organisations but froze it following
protests from western governments. One proposal was to classify leftist groups
receiving overseas funding as “foreign agents”.
At the same time groups like Rabbis for Human Rights and
Physicians for Human Rights were rejected for tax-exempt status, limiting their
ability to fundraise, while right-wing groups were given the status.
Rosenberg said Netanyahu’s new government appeared to
have learnt its lesson and was avoiding overtly politicised legislation.
“This time it looks like they are going to be much
smarter – and that makes the situation more dangerous,” she said. “By
conditioning funding on permission from the defence ministry or a Knesset
committee, they can say they are following practices adopted in countries like
Egypt, Jordan and India.”
She feared that Israel would be able to rebuff criticism
by claiming it was being singled out.
Communications ‘czar’
Farah, of Mossawa, said Netanyahu was also seeking to
“consolidate his power over the media”, as a further way to silence critics.
As well as becoming communications minister, he has
placed himself in charge of the Israel Broadcasting Authority, and increased
his control of the ministerial committee overseeing legislation.
As part of the coalition agreement, Netanyahu insisted
that his partners commit to supporting any communications initiatives he
introduces.
Amir Teig, a media analyst, warned that Netanyahu was
determined to turn himself into a “communications czar”.
Yossi Verter, a political analyst for Haaretz, argued
that this was “payback time” for Netanyahu. Netanyahu was reported to have been
incensed by news coverage during the campaign that painted him in an
unflattering light.
Threat to TV channels
Netanyahu’s main goal, according to analysts, is to end
any threat of restrictions on the national daily newspaper Israel Hayom.
Netanyahu’s coalition partners in the last Knesset
denounced the paper as Israel’s “Pravda”, after the official mouthpiece of the
former Soviet regime.
Netanyahu called early elections last November shortly
after the Knesset passed the first reading of legislation to bar national
distribution of a free newspaper to limit Israel Hayom’s influence.
The paper, which loses Adelson an estimated $5m a year,
has left the largest paid-for newspaper, Yedioth Aharonoth, which is critical
of Netanyahu, struggling.
Netanyahu has also used his communications role to make
life difficult for the country’s two loss-making commercial TV stations,
Channels 2 and 10. He has offered no relief on their heavy debts, with Channel
10 in particular in danger of closure.
Farah said Netanyahu’s financial threats were an
effective way to intimidate the broadcasters who rely on state advertising.
Judges ready for fight
Concerns for the Supreme Court, the final court of
appeal for Palestinians in the occupied territories, as well as for minorities
inside Israel, are also mounting.
Netanyahu shocked many in the legal community last month
by appointing Jewish Home’s Shaked as justice minister. She has been a fierce
critic of the court for being too liberal.
A retired Supreme Court justice was quoted saying of her
appointment: “They [the government] are inviting a fight.”
Shaked is known to want to deny the Supreme Court the
right to overturn laws and to change the judicial appointments system so that
right-wing judges dominate.
“The idea of the court as a liberal institution is a
myth,” said Daphna Golan, a law professor at Hebrew University in Jerusalem
specialising in human rights. “It is actually very conservative and rarely
protects the rights of Palestinians, whether in the occupied territories or in
Israel.”
“But as far as Shaked and the right are concerned, it is
too activist and they want to weaken it.”
This week Shaked introduced her first bill as justice
minister, setting a 10-year jail tariff for those found guilty of throwing
stones. Observers expect the law to be applied only to Palestinians.
Golan said the danger was that, faced with threats from
the government, the Supreme Court was becoming ever more loath to uphold human
rights, removing yet more democratic protections.
