During the War, Switzerland Turned Away Jewish Refugees from Nazi Germany - It Even Insisted that the Nazis Put ‘J' on the Passports of German Jews
The
kidnapping of Ali Abunimah on the streets of Zurich by the Swiss Gestapo is no
surprise. Switzerland has a history of authoritarianism. In Europe today
freedom of speech is under attack in a way not seen since before World War II.
Ali
described what happened in an article he wrote on the plane to Istanbul:
I
was abducted off the street around 1:30pm on Saturday while on my way to the
Palestine teach-in by undercover agents, handcuffed, forced into an unmarked
car and sped straight to the prison. My “crime”? Being a journalist who speaks
up for Palestine and against Israel’s genocide and settler-colonial savagery
and those who aid and abet it.
As
Ali says:
Speaking
out for Palestine is not a crime! Standing against racist genocidal Zionism is
not a crime! Say it with me ‘From the River to the Sea Palestine Will Be Free!’
I’m free! I wrote this on the plane and I’m posting it just after landing at Istanbul. On Monday evening I was brought to Zurich airport in handcuffs, in a small metal cage inside a windowless prison van and led all the way to the plane by police. This is after three days and two… pic.twitter.com/S4BF2eEYYQ
— Ali Abunimah (@AliAbunimah) January 27, 2025
It
is a little known fact that even the Nazis hesitated to mark the passports of German
Jews. It was Heinrich Rothmund, the Head of the Swiss Police, who insisted
that the Nazis mark the passports of Jews with a ‘J'. After all how could the
Swiss immigration authorities tell who was a Jew and who wasn’t when it came to
turning back refugees from Germany? What
the good burghers of the Alpine country didn’t want was an influx of German Jewish
refugees.
Switzerland
was an ostensibly neutral country, the only one apart from Sweden that wasn’t
invaded, but in practice it was pro-Nazi and performed many valuable financial
tasks for the Nazi state. Swiss banks were happy to accept the deposits of German
Jewish citizens as well as much of the loot that the Nazis stole from their
victims, but they were less keen to disgorge their ill-gotten gains after the
war.
In
the ‘Sinister
Face of Neutrality’ subtitled ‘The Role of Swiss Financial Institutions in the
Plunder of European Jewry’ the role of Switzerland in acting as a safe
haven for stolen Jewish and other assets is described:
Switzerland
served as a repository for Jewish capital smuggled out of Nazi Germany and the
states threatened by it, and also for vast quantities of gold and other
valuables plundered from Jews and others all over Europe. Right up until the
end of the war, Switzerland laundered hundreds of millions of dollars in stolen
assets, including gold taken from the central banks of German-occupied Europe.
At the war's end Switzerland successfully resisted Allied calls to restitute
these funds, and in the Washington Agreement of 1946 the Allies contented
themselves with acceptance of a mere 12% of the stolen gold. Holocaust
survivors and the heirs of those who perished met an implacable wall of
bureaucracy and only a handful managed to reclaim their assets.
The Electronic Intifada's executive director @AliAbunimah was deported by Switzerland on Monday after spending two nights in jail. https://t.co/Mg4gJC6wc0
— Electronic Intifada (@intifada) January 27, 2025
In
Swiss found culpable of
'helping Nazis we learn that
A
report by an independent inquiry into Switzerland's second world war history
concludes that Swiss officials "helped the Nazi regime achieve its
goals" by closing the country's borders to thousands of Jewish refugees,
effectively sending them back to near certain death.
The
findings of the multinational Independent Commission of Experts, led by a Swiss
historian, Jean-François Bergier, and established by the Swiss parliament three
years ago, have shaken Switzerland's prim view of itself as an unsullied,
neutral, safe-haven that resisted Nazi oppression.
The
report concludes that the authorities knew by the summer of 1942 that Jewish
refugees arriving at the country's borders faced almost certain death when they
were turned back.
"Even
after they were informed about the unbelievable and unimaginable events taking
place, the federal authorities - like the governments of most other states -
made few changes in their policies regarding refugees. Most frequently, neutral
states demonstrated indifference and passivity or attempted to accommodate the
Nazi system."
Raul Hilberg's description in Destruction of the European Jews of the Swiss role in German Jews Having Their Passports Stamped with a 'J'
I
wrote in my book about how the International Committee of the Red Cross refused
to provide any protection for Jews since they had accepted the Nazi designation
of them as stateless and common criminals. The official history of the War Refugee Board
noted that;
The Board also
appealed to the International Committee of the Red Cross time and again to take
direct and aggressive action to obtain humanitarian treatment for the helpless
minorities being persecuted so viciously by the Germans. For many months,
however, request after request from the Board met with the answer that the
Germans would not permit the proposed action.
According
to ICRC President Max Huber they could not be seen to be ‘intruding into the domestic policy’ of the
Nazis.’
There were
discussions throughout August 1942 about the murder of Jewish civilians yet at
the ICRC executive of 14 October 1942 the pro-Nazi
former foreign minister of Switzerland,
Philip Etter,
‘opposed even the anodyne Huber draft’ calling for the humane treatment of
civilians, not even Jews, ‘arguing that it could be interpreted as a violation
of neutrality.’ Etter’s view
prevailed.
In the
Netherlands the Dutch Red Cross made no effort to communicate with deported
Jews ‘although it did send a fully equipped ambulance to the Eastern front ‘to
comfort the Dutch Waffen-SS volunteers fighting there.’
The
Dutch historian, Louis de Jong, condemned the ICRC for its ‘almost total lack of concern for the
Jews’ disasters.’
Tony Greenstein
How come a journalist gets arrested over nothing, but a predator, like Ivor Caplan, gets to walk free ?
ReplyDeleteWell, there's one thing the two cases have in common- no coverage in the corporate press.
Deleteyes the prostitute press - from the Guardian to the Daily Hate Mail sees nothing worrying in things like this. Quite normal
DeleteTony, what do you think about the claim about Ireland's pm apparently being an antisemite - is there any validity to them ?
ReplyDeleteApparently a Jewish woman was ejected from a Holocaust memorial event for turning her back during the pms speech, which was alledgedley because he mentioned Gaza.
Zionists accuse anyone who doesn't support Israel's bloodlust of 'antisemitism'' so the answer is 'not much'. If this woman, regardless of religion was disrespectful then of course she deserved to be ejected especially if the bitch supports genocide in Gaza
DeleteThe woman who was physically ejected is a long-time Israeli activist. Others who turned their backs or walked out during the President's speech did so in a coordinated fashion. Michael D. Higgins is hated by Zionists here, and with good reason. He rejects their spurious hierarchy of suffering and recognises the genocide Israel is inflicting on Palestinians.
Delete