Political Correspondent 'Liar' Lee Harpin inflates the pre-war membership of
Poale Zion (now the JLM) by tens of thousands
It
was a pretty stupid mistake but then ‘Liar’ Lee Harpin, the Jewish Chronicle’s
Political Correspondent is pretty stupid. He is used to
getting his information from hacking into other peoples’ phones, hence normal
journalism is alien to him.For
those not aware, he was arrested by Police when working for the Daily Mirror but unfortunately he wasn't charged.
Shapurji Saklatvala - first Communist MP in England
In a puff
piece in the Jewish Chronicle ‘Hundreds join Jewish
Labour Movement to vote on who succeeds Jeremy Corbyn’ Liar Lee informed the Jewish Chronicle’s gullible readership that
‘While
JLM once counted tens of thousands of members during the group’s pre-Second
World War heyday, the 3,000-strong membership list is the highest it has been
over the past decade.’
I therefore wrote a simple letter
to the Editor, the far-right Islamaphobe and member of the Henry Jackson
Society, Stephen Pollard, also former editor of The Express, pointing out just a few of Liar Lee’s many
inaccuracies:
This article was a lie from beginning to end but no one at the Jewish Chronicle cares any longer about the truth
i.The JLM
wasn’t in existence before the war. Poale Zion ‘the Workers of Zion’ was the
name of the Israeli Labour Party’s British wing. It changed its name in 2004 as
a cursory look at Wikpedia
would have told LL.
ii.Far from
its membership being in the ‘tens of thousands’ before the war, it barely
reached 500! Jewish workers had contempt for Zionism.Zionism was a movement of the reactionary
middle class not workers. Even after the war it only climbed to 1,500 according
to Paul Kelemn’s authoritative British Zionism
and the Left.
'Liar' Lee Harpin's previous speciality was phones - other peoples!
iii.I could
have added that if the JLM boasts a membership of 3,000 then it is its highest
ever.I doubt it had even 200 members a
decade ago.It had been defunct and was
only refounded
in 2015 with the specific task of campaigning against Jeremy Corbyn. In short
the JLM is an arm of the Israeli state inside the British Labour Party rather
than an organisation of Labour supporting Jews. That is why it refused to
support Labour in the last election.
iv.One
should take the claimed 3,000 membership with a hefty dose of salt.As I’ve written before the majority of the
JLM’s members are non-Jewish.So much
for its claim to represent Jewish labour members. If more Jewish members are
joining now, as Liar Lee claims, then it is highly unlikely they are Labour
Party members or even supporters of the Labour Party (you don’t need to be a Labour
Party member to join the JLM).Given the JLM’s campaign against Corbyn it is likely to attract the
likes of Jonathan Hoffman and others closer to Zionism’s fascist wing.
Liar Lee Harpin - after a spell hacking phones at The Mirror Lee felt quite at home at the Jewish Chronicle
Below is my letter to the Jewish
Chronicle correcting a few of their mistakes.Unsurprisingly my letter was not published.
Phil Piratin Communist MP for Mile End 1945-50 - over half his voters were estimated to be Jewish
In my letter I too made a minor
mistake. Phil Piratin was not the only Communist MP to have sat for an English
constituency. In fact Shapurji Saklatvala was
elected for BatterseaNorth in October
1922, defeated in 1923 and was elected again from 1924 to 1929.However Saklatvala was endorsed by the then Labour
Party in 1922 and de facto in
1924.Unlike the Jewish Chronicle, I
admit to even the most minor of errors!
Given the lies that Liar Lee and
his Editor have told for the past 4 years about Jeremy Corbyn and ‘anti-Semitism’
in the Labour Party LL’s ‘mistake’ concerning the JLM must be considered
trivial indeed.
Tony Greenstein
The
Editor
Stephen
Pollard,
The
Jewish Chronicle, 915
High Rd, London, N12
8QJ
Dear Stephen,
I realise that Lee Harpin has
always had a tenuous grip on reality, hence his appointment as your political
correspondent, however his claim [Hundreds join Jewish Labour Movement to vote on who
succeeds Jeremy Corbyn, January 6th 2020] that
the Jewish Labour Movement ‘once counted tens of thousands of
members during the group’s pre-Second World War heyday’
, has taken his ability to invent facts to new, undreamt of heights.
I realise that you will consider me pedantic but
prior to 2004 there was no JLM. The group was called, more accurately, Poale
Zion, an organisation which all good class conscious Jewish workers avoided
like the plague.
According to Paul Kelemen’s 2012 book ‘The British Left and Zionism – History of a
Divorce’ the pre-war membership of PZ stood at 500 (see page 98) before
increasing to 1,500 after the war. Much as you would like to rewrite history,
so as to pretend that British Jews were always solid Zionists, the fact is that
the Jewish working class of the East End was indifferent if not hostile to
Zionism.
It was Jewish workers in the East End constituency
of Mile End who voted overwhelmingly in 1945 to elect the only Communist MP
that has ever sat for an English constituency, Phil Piratin. You see the
anti-fascist struggle against the genuine anti-Semitism of Sir Oswald Moseley’s
British Union of Fascists and support for Zionism did not go hand in.
The Charity
Commission Refused to Deregister the CAA in 2017 for Political Campaigning - I
Have Resubmitted My Complaint Before Going to the Charity Tribunal
I have just submitted a renewed
complaint to the Charity Commission against the Campaign AgainstAnti-Semitism who, as people know, I have also sued
for libel. The outcome of the interim hearing to determine the meaning of anti-Semitism
(it didn’t determine any meaning!) is here. I First Put a Link to this Video on my You Tube Channel - Glasman put in a Copyright Objection - a Strange Thing to Do For a Political Non-Commercial Video - Clearly He Feels Embarrassed by What He Said - However I also Saved the Video to Hard Disk and Google Drive
I have also had a longstanding petition against the Campaign Against Anti-Semitism which has nearly 8,000 signatures. If you haven’t already sign please do.
According to the Charity Commission this type of abuse is perfectly charitable!
I
have submitted my complaint in the wake of Joe Glasman, Head of Political and
Goverment Investigations at the so-called Campaign Against Antisemitism taking
credit for the defeat of Jeremy Corbyn at the hands of his 'Macabees'.
John Bercow, the former Speaker of the House of Commons, who is also Jewish, in an interview in GQ magazine stated that there wasn't a 'whiff' of antisemitism about Corbyn.
Professor Geoffrey Alderman, a Jewish Chronicle columnist for 14 years and a right-wing Zionist wrote that there was no substance to the allegations of antisemitism against Corbyn
Glasman believes that his vile gang of racists has something in common
with Hebrew tribesmen fighting their battles against the Assyrians 2,000+ year
ago. The reality is that if the Zionists came across these Hebrews toay they and their Israeli friends would be the first to shoot them as 'terrorists' and 'infiltrators'. Their claim to a direct biological lineage is the stuff of which racial myths are made.
Just what charitable purpose was served by calling a demonstration against Jeremy Corbyn and the Labour Party? The Charity Commission doesn't say
In February 2017 I submitted a
complaint to the Charity Commission, which was then chaired by the racist and
Islamaphobic bigot, William Shawcross.
Unsurprisingly the complaint did not get very far.
The Charity Commission was chaired from 2012-2018 by the racist bigot and Islamaphobe
In the light of the CAA’s unremitting campaign
against Corbyn since then, a campaign about which they have
boasted, I have submitted a second complaint and if (when) it is rejected I
will take it to the First Tier Charity Tribunal.
This is the kind of vicious targeting of a vulnerable Palestinian student that the Charity Commission has endorsed as compatible with its charitable objectives
The CAA specialises in demonising people such as Exeter student Malaka - she was accused of being a 'terrorist supporting antisemite' . The allegations the CAA made were completely untrue and the Daily Mail/Express and the local Devon Live apologised for them. Not so the CAA.
Rather than rehearse the evidence
against the CAA please read my complaint and also previous blog posts, here
and here
as well as a report
on my libel action
The one thing that the Campaign
Against Anti-Semitism doesn’t do is to campaign against anti-Semitism. Anti-Semitism
of the traditional kind is all but ignored by it but ‘anti-Semitism’ of the
anti-Zionist or pro-Palestinian variety
is very much its concern.
The CAA's pamphlet The CAA says in its charitable objectives that its purpose is to create racial harmony yet in its pamphlet British Muslims and Antisemitism it accuses British Muslims of being 'more likely by far than the general British population to hold deeply anti-Semitic views. It is clear that many British Muslims reserve a special hatred for British Jews...'
The photograph above, the cover of a CAA Report on Muslims and 'antisemitism' implies that Muslim supporters of the Palestinians are Hitler supporters on the basis of the actions of one idiot. It is an example of their idiot. Was the paedophile abuse of former President of the Board of Deputies of British Jews, Lord Janner, typical of Jews? Would that be antisemitic?
This full colour profile was taken down after protests to be replaced by the Black and White version below
The full
report which included a racist full
colour profile of the ‘typical’ Muslim was taken down after
protests. It was replaced by a
black and white version. [1]
The image of a Muslim was accompanied by a strap line ‘More likely to be’ and then there were a series of bubbles:
Male,
In Social Housing,
Older than 35,
Working,
Living in Scotland
or in England South of the Midlands,
Sympathetic to Terrorism,
Extremism or violence,
First Generation Immigrant
It should
not be necessary to point out how racist and offensive this description of
Muslims by a ‘charity’ is. Just imagine that a Muslim charity posted a similar
image of the ‘typical Jew’. One suspects the Charity Commission would not take
more than 3 years to move into action given its previous record of action in
respect of Muslim charities.
The CAA called for the University to dismiss
Dr Gould. As its scare quotes
demonstrate, it has complete contempt for academic freedom. Perhaps this is in
furtherance of their charitable objectives?
Kenneth
Stern, who drafted the IHRA definition of anti-Semitism, in written testimony to the US House of
Representatives Committee on the Judiciary argued that “The definition was
not drafted, and was never intended, as a tool to target or chill speech on a
college campus.”[4] Stern cited the case of Professor Gould:
“Perhaps most
egregious, an off-campus group [CAA] citing the definition called on a university to
conduct an inquiry of a professor (who received her PhD from Columbia) for
antisemitism, based on an article she had written years before.The
university then conducted the inquiry.And while it ultimately found
no basis to discipline the professor, the exercise itself was chilling and
McCarthy-like.”
Mr Gideon Falter, Chief Executive of the CAA called on the university to dismiss
Dr Gould. The University concluded that “the article is not
anti-Semitic and does not breach the proper bounds of freedom of speech and
academic freedom.”
Perhaps
the Charity Commission would care to explain how targeting academics for
McCarthyite witchhunts is compatible with the CAA’s charitable objectives.
Jackie Walker – the CAA accuse the first Israeli
Prime Minister David Ben Gurion of Holocaust denial
Jackie was expelled from the
Labour Party for ‘“prejudicial
and grossly detrimental behaviour against the party” not anti-Semitism. However
the CAA has no less than 67 articles on its website attacking Jackie as an
‘anti-Semite’.
‘If
I were an Arab leader, I would never sign an agreement with Israel. It is
normal. We have taken their country. It is true G-d promised it to us, but how
could that interest them? Our G-d is not theirs. There has been anti-Semitism,
the Nazis, Hitler, Auschwitz but was that their fault? They see but one thing:
we have come and we have stolen their country. Why would they accept that?’
It is difficult to understand the psychopathology
and mental gymnastics by which the above statement could be read as a denial of
Hitler’s responsibility for the Holocaust. However the CAA managed it.
What the CAA did not realise that this
quote was taken from The Jewish Paradox, a book by Nahum Goldmann, the first President of
the World Jewish Congress and President of the World Zionist Organisation . The quotation came from David Ben
Gurion, the first Prime Minister of Israel. Ben Gurion was responsible for the
ethnic cleansing of the Palestinians but even he was capable of reflecting
reflecting on the situation of his victims. Ben Gurion understood that what
Hitler had done was not the Palestinians’ fault even though they had paid the
price. But to the CAA any attempt to
understand the Palestinian point of view, especially when the Holocaust is
mentioned, is tantamount to Holocaust denial.
When they realised their mistake the CAA
quickly removed the article and pretended nothing had happened. No apology was
ever offered for having all but accused Jackie Walker of being a holocaust
denier. Before this post had been taken down it was widely publicised on social
media and many people, including the idiot political correspondent of Jewish News,
Jack Mendel, commented on it.
To date there have been 535 hostile articles attacking Jeremy
Corbyn.Given that charities are
supposed to be non-party political this is outrageous and the fact that the Charity
Commission has done nothing to date about it is symptomatic of how all wings of
the State mobilised against a radical leader of the Labour Party.It is confirmation of the Marxist belief that
the bourgeois state is never neutral politically between capital and labour,
left and right.
Ten Years Ago Stephen Pollard, the JC's Editor DEFENDED antisemitic Polish MEP, Michal
Kaminski, because he was pro-Israel
John Bercow, the former Speaker, denies that there is any trace of antiSemitism about Jeremy Corbyn
‘Anti-Semitism’ has become one of
the key weapons in the Establishment’s war on Corbyn and the Labour Party, as I
predicted in a letter to The Independent over 3 years ago. I wrote that:
‘Incidents of anti-Semitism in
the Labour Party have been shown to be mainly froth without substance. It is
time to end the weaponisation of anti-Semitism. The only people who benefit
from this are real anti-Semites. It is the “boy cried wolf” syndrome.
If only Corbyn had listened to me rather than the idiot Seamus Milne then all could have been different!
Events
unfortunately have proven me correct.A
series of anti-racist figures in the Labour Party – from Ken Livingstone to
Jackie Walker to Chris Williamson have been targeted by the supporters of
Zionism and Israel.All in the name of
the fight against ‘anti-Semitism’.
Today
the Jewish Chronicle is in full throttle.It is literally becoming hysterical as the Tory campaign flounders.Last week Stephen Pollard wrote to his
readers:
‘Over the
next 6 weeks we will discover whether the British public are prepared to put an
anti-Semite into No. 10.’
The Jewish Chronicle's hysterical front page this week
And
he wasn’t talking about Boris Johnson or Jo Swinson! This week it has gone
further.In a front
page editorial entitled ‘To All Our
Fellow British Citizens’ it informs us that
‘The vast
majority of British Jews consider Jeremy Corbyn to be an antisemite. In the
most recent poll, last month, the figure was 87 per cent.’
As
I wrote yesterday on this blog
‘If as the Jewish Chronicle claims 87% of British Jews
consider Jeremy Corbyn an anti-Semite then British Jews are amongst the most
stupid people on this planet.’
Of
course British Jews have had a 4 year barrage of propaganda designed to make
them fearful, telling them that Jeremy Corbyn is an anti-Semiteand that the Gestapo is around the corner.
However
that doesn’t excuse their inability to work out what is happening nor does it
excuse the utter stupidity of Labour leaders, prime amongst them Jennie Formby
and Corbyn himself, who have proceeded on the basis that if they did everything
their accusers told them to do then all would be alright.
Ironically
UNITE leader Len McLuskey got it right when he wrote
in the Huff Post that ‘Jewish Community Leaders Are Refusing To Take 'Yes' For An Answer’. UnfortunatelyLen didn’t draw the
obvious conclusions which was that the Zionists, which is what they are,
weren’t interested in answers.They
wanted Corbyn’s head and until they got it they would proceed with their
campaign.
Week after week the same message - Corbyn is a racist
But
Corbyn and his advisors should have worked that out a long time ago too. The
first thing that Corbyn should do if he gains office is to give Seamus Milne,
his useless advisor the sack. Milne should have put two and two together and
then proceeded to devise a strategy for standing up these petty businessmen.
It
doesn’t take much to work out that supporters of Donald Trump and Netanyahu are
unlikely to really believe in fighting anti-Semitism. Did Corbyn not know that
the Board of Deputies has never fought fascist anti-Semitism always
advising the Jewish community to keep its head down?
Pollard Gets Around - The paper that supported Hitler, opposed Jewish refugees from Nazi Germany coming in and employed Katie Hopkins opposes 'antisemitism'
When 29
Orthodox Jewish rabbis wrote supporting Corbyn and attacking the Board of
Deputies Corbyn should have thanked them and then utilised that support.
Despite the pathetic
attempt of Pollard to suggest that the letter wasn’t genuine.
Only
this week John Bercow, one of the few principled members of the parliamentary
establishment, stated
outright that there wasn’t a whiff of anti-Semitism about Jeremy Corbyn.
The Jewish Telegraph doesn't like its columnists thinking for themselves - apparently they think Alderman needed their permission to post the video!
Likewise
the foremost historian of the British Jewish community and himself a Zionist,
but an honest one (they are few and far between these days) Professor Geoffrey
Alderman, in a video and a Spectator article last May, made it clear that
Jeremy Corbyn has stood
up for his constituents against genuine racists like Margaret Hodge, who
was all in favour of demolishing a Jewish cemetery.
The JLM is the overseas wing (or in its works the ‘sister
party’ of the almost defunct Israeli Labour Party. Because in Israel there
is no space left for ‘Left’ Zionism any longer.The sole purpose of Labour Zionism is to prettify the State of Israel.
What is truly outrageous is that the JLM has refused
to endorse or support Labour’s election campaign and yet it still remains
an affiliated socialist society.
Every time Corbyn promised to do better, to kick
the ‘anti-Semites’ out of the party, then their enemies used that to ‘prove’
that Labour was ‘anti-Semitic’.By
accepting their enemies narrative they sharpened the weapon against them. If
they had called these shysters out from the start they would have nipped it in
the bud. Instead it has grown into a Frankenstein. It cannot be emphasised
enough
THIS CAMPAIGN AGAINST
‘ANTI-SEMITISM’ HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH ANTI-SEMITISM.
That is why the Zionists were so insistent in the
summer of 2018 that the Labour Party had to adopt the IHRA
definition of anti-Semitism. Slated
by academic and legal scholars it nevertheless was a crucial weapon in the
attack on supporters of Palestinians and anti-Zionists in the Labour Party.
Even the person who wrote the damn thing, American academic Kenneth Stern has
now accepted that it is ‘chilling’ free
speech in his testimony
to Congress.
Instead of anti-Semitism being hostility to or
prejudice against Jews, the OED definition,
it was now defined by hostility to Israel, the ‘new anti-Semitism’ that
Zionists have been promoting for over 30 years.11 illustrations of anti-Semitism accompanied the IHRA, 7 of which
relate to Israel. Calling Israel a racist state (or endeavour) was now
anti-Semitic even though Israel is a racist state.
Exercising ‘double standards’ when criticising
Israel by not criticising every other dictatorship was now ‘anti-Semitic’. This
was precisely what apologists for Apartheid in South Africa alleged.Why criticise us when there are far worse
states?
A few of this week's Jewish Chronicle headlines - it's all go to stop Hitler Corbyn
The irony in all this is that the person who has
led the charge, former Express editor Stephen Pollard is himself is a virulent
racist. He is a founding
signatory of the Henry Jackson Society, the Associate
Director of which is none other than Douglas Murray, a man who even the
Tory Front Bench cut
their links with such was his racism. Statements such as
‘There
are certain things in Britain about which it is impossible to speak frankly.
The birth rate of the Muslim population is a prime subject”
Former Tory MP Paul Goodman in an article
explaining why the
Tory frontbench broke off relations with
Murrayon the Conservative Home website cited how in2006
Murray made a speech in the Dutch Parliament arguing that
"Conditions
for Muslims in Europe must be made harder across the board: Europe must look
like a less attractive proposition".
Suggestions
as to how this might be achieved included ‘demolishing
mosques in certain circumstances.’ and that "all immigration into Europe from Muslim countries must stop"
The Trump remedy. This is the kind of person Pollard finds congenial company.
Not
once has the Jewish Chronicle campaigned against genuine racism such as
Windrush. Indeed Pollard had the audacity to berate
Corbyn for not having shown the same ‘passion
you have shown over the Windrush scandal?’ for anti-Semitism. The JC has
never once concerned itself with racism against Black and Muslim people. Not
surprisingly since it acts as a mouthpiece for the Israeli state.
What is even worse though is that Pollard is unconcerned
about genuine anti-Semitism, hatred or hostility to Jews as Jews. His only
condition is that they should support Israel. The JC has no criticism of Viktor
Orban, the anti-Semitic Prime Minister of Hungary who is rehabilitating Admiral
Horthy, the pro-Nazi ruler of Hungary during the war, who presided over the
deportation of half a million Jews to Auschwitz in 1944.In Orban’s view
Horthy was an ‘exceptional statesman’.Orban was an honoured guest in Israel last
summer and Netanyahu was a guest the year before.
Even worse was the scandal that arose in 2009. The Tories
left the mainstream European Peoples’ Party in the European Parliament for the European
Conservative Reform Group. The ECR contains a host of anti-Semitic and
racist parties such as Poland’s Law and Justice Party, the Latvian
LNNK/Fatherland and Freedom Party, the Danish People’s Party and the Swedish
Democrats.
The Law & Justice Party which is deeply anti-Semitic also
had as its leader in the European parliament one Michal Kaminski, who had been
a member of a neo-Nazi group.Kaminski
was the MP for Jedwabne, a village where in 1941 up to 1,600Jews were herded into a barn which was then
set alight.Not by the SS but local
Poles, supporters of the Nationalist Party. When in 2001 the Polish President Aleksander
Kwasniewski. offered a formal apology
and a memorial was erected in Jedwabne on the 60th anniversary of
the massacre Kaminski was heading the Committee to Establish the Good Name of
Jedwabne.
When Vivien Wineman, then President of the Board of Deputies
raised the issue, he was attacked bitterly by the same people who are now part
of the anti-Semitism smears. Dean Godson of the Policy Exchange think tank, attacked
Wineman’s intervention at a meeting of the Holocaust
Educational Trust one of the organisations that is a signed up member of
the anti-Semitism smear campaigns.Wineman came under sustained attack and in the end backed off.Genuine anti-Semitism was of no concern to
these people.
David Miliband as Foreign Secretary attacked
the Tories over these links and Jonathan Freedland, the Guardian columnist found
it too much. He wrote
that ‘Once
no self-respecting politician would have gone near people such as Kaminski.’Pollard
replied
two days later ‘
‘Poland's Kaminski is not an antisemite: he's a
friend to Jews’.And what was the basis of his friendship? ‘Kaminski is... one of the greatest
friends to the Jews in a town where antisemitism and a visceral loathing of
Israel are rife.’
In
other words if you support Israel, as many fascists (Tommy Robinson, Richard
Spencer, Steven Bannon) do then that cancels out Jew hate. Kaminski had argued
that ‘Poles should not
apologise for what they did [at Jedwabne] until Jews apologised to them for
their actions which had included "murdering Poles".
The Tories Got Into Bed With This Man and Pollard Supported It
Pollard
even defended Latvia’s MEP Roberts Zile: ‘I
can think of no source for evidence against Zile other than those who so
disgracefully besmirch Kaminski.’ Well the evidence was there in abundance.
Every year Zile marched with the veterans of the Latvian Waffen SS, which was
the most decorated out of all the SS divisions.
In
an open
letter to the Latvian parliament Monika Lowenberg described how they had
taken part in the murder of her brother in the Riga Ghetto in 1941. She wrote of
her
‘deep
concern that British Conservative MEPs in the European Parliament work with the
Latvian MEP Roberts Zile and have made an unholy alliance with the party to
which he is connected.’
So
how do we square Pollard’s defence of genuine anti-Semites with the Pollard who runs, week after week, editorials
denouncing ‘anti-Semitism’ in the Labour Party. The only answer is Zionism and Israel.
These
facts are known in abundance and it is perplexing that Corbyn and his advisors
haven’t once had the guts or the gumption to respond to Pollard and the Board
of Deputies over their nauseating hypocrisy.
The
only concerns of the Board of Deputies are the Israeli state.When Israel began murdering unarmed
protestors last year at the Gaza fence, the Board of Deputies defended
the Israeli military. That is their only
concern yet Formby believes that if she expels a few more Palestinian
supporters everything will be right.
There
is one lesson that should have been learnt, even by the most stupid member of
Corbyn’s entourage and that is that if you appease an aggressor they only
become stronger. Instead of standing up to the Zionist lobby they have been
appeased and every time they have been appeased they have grown stronger.
Now
we face a full-on broadside from racists like Pollard and what is Lansman and
Momentum’s response?To throw Chris
Williamson, the only MP who had the guts to call out these racists for what
they are, under the bus. That is why my position is very simple.
Full Support for Chris
Williamson
I
am giving my full support to Chris Williamson as an Independent Socialist
candidate in the Derby North by-election. I understand that the Labour Party
nationally have imposed a Blairite on the constituency. Those, like Lara
MacNeill, a Lansman toerag who suggest
that Chris is splitting the vote are looking at the world upside down! It is
her boss who engineered the NEC vote that refused to endorse Chris as a sitting
MP.If anyone is splitting the vote it
is Lansman and the NEC.Unlike the
imposed Blairite, he will support Jeremy Corbyn if and when he is elected.
I
am pleased to see that the Morning Star has run
an article today from Chris.It is
well worth reading.
