Beyond Satire – The Union of Jewish Students and Jewish Labour Movement Complain that the Head of a group committed to ethnic cleansing is a Racist!
In October 2010 49 of us had a letter
published in the Guardian calling for Ed
Miliband not to follow in Blair and Brown’s footsteps and become a patron of
the ethnic cleansing JNF.
We were
successful and Miliband defied tradition. A few months later David Cameron resigned his sponsorship.
Sam Hayek,
the Chair of JNF UK responded to our letter writing:
To accuse the JNF of being "actively complicit in the ethnic cleansing
of Palestinians" represents a distortion of the truth on the grandest
of scales. Our environmental and humanitarian work is not based on any
political or religious affiliation, but rather on supporting Israel and its
population – whatever their background.
I wrote
If diplomats are
virtuous men sent abroad to lie for their country (Henry Wotton), what is
Samuel Hayek of the Jewish
National Fund's excuse.... the JNF's own
entry on the Charity Commission website states that its objects include “such charitable purposes as benefit persons
of Jewish religion, race or origin".
Although
JNF UK has
now changed the wording it hasn’t changed its activities.
Top: the JNF's Charitable Objects today and Bottom the JNF's Charitable Objects in 2010
Out
is ‘benefiting Jewish persons’. In is
‘For the benefit of the population of the
State of Israel ’ The only mention of Jews is:
To advance the Jewish religion, Jewish
beliefs and religious education (including supporting the education of Jewish
culture, history, practices and beliefs).
Hayek
did not respond to my letter because he had been showns to be a liar.
It
is no surprise that we now learn that Hayek is an Islamaphobe who agrees with
the neo-Nazi White
Replacement Theory whereby Muslim immigrants are driving
out White Christians from Europe.
In
an interview with the Jerusalem Post Hayek declared
that “Jews have no future in England”.
He told
the Jewish News:
The
evidence is the number of immigrants to England. The demographic of British
society is changing.
Asked
if he was referring to issues around Muslims, he replied:
“You are not wrong,” adding:
Our
problem in the West is that we do not understand Islam. In Islam there is not a
term for ‘peace’.
Hayek
suggested
that British Jews should consider emigration, the Zionists’ wet dream:
Gary Mond - Islamaphobic bigot and JNF trustee
Last
week the Senior Vice-President of the Board of Deputies, Gary Mond, was forced
to resign. Mond had written
on Facebook and tweeted
that ‘all
civilization’ is ‘at war with Islam.’
Mond is also a trustee of JNF-UK, as is Gideon Falter, its Vice Chair and CEO
of the Campaign Against
Anti-Semitism. The CAA’s 11 trustees are a roll
call of some of the most viciously racist British Zionists.
The JNF's 11 racist trustees
The Charity Commission, which has repeatedly been
written to regarding its refusal to deregister UK JNF has at last been forced
to open an investigation
into this so-called ‘charity’.
Two motions have
been submitted to the BOD which
criticise the JNF for “failing
to disavow the inflammatory and bigoted remarks of its chair Samuel Hayek”. One
censures JNF trustees for not disavowing Hayek’s remarks. The other calls on it
to suspend the JNF’s Board membership until Hayek steps down. The motions are
proposed by Union of Jewish Students president-elect Joel Rosen and Finchley
Reform Synagogue member Robert Stone.
Gary Mond, the then Senior BOD Vice-President, spoke of his “respect” for Hayek over the comments.
Mond also liked two tweets by Pamela
Geller – a White Supremacist and fascist, who has been banned from entry to the
UK. According to the Southern Poverty Law Centre
Geller has a
long history of working with extremists and racists in the United States,
Canada and Europe, including the Jewish Defense League, the English Defense League and the white nationalist group Bloc Identitaire, among others.
A Facebook post by Mond stated that"We just have to hope that our leaders wake up to the fact that all civilisation-west and east, American, Russian, Chinese, Israeli, whatever - is at war with these evil bastards, and I have to say it at war with Islam. And, just as Islam has lost before in history, it will lose again."
This profile of the average Muslim male appeared in a Report by the CAA - if such a drawing had portrayed the 'average British Jew' you can imagine the hypocritical fury of the Zionists
Meanwhile, you will be glad to
hear, a defence campaign for Hayek and Mond has been
launched and who better to lead it than
Jonathan Hoffman, the link man between far-Right Zionists and
openly fascist groups like Britain First. Mond’s supporters are a roll call of
openly fascist Zionists such as Damon Lenszner, Martin Sugarman, Sharon Klaff,
David Collier, Board of Deputies member Yochy Davis and Ambrosine Shitreet of
Pegida. In total more than 100 supporters signed an open letter in defence of
Mond and Hayek, who has accused the Board of “cancel culture”.
Hoffman et al argue that
“the complex subject of anti-Jewish racism within the Muslim community
appears a taboo subject — and those who dare mention it are branded
‘Islamophobic’!”
They declare support for Hayek’s right
to express an opinion
without being targeted, subjected to harassment’ or calls for his resignation. Expressing
an opinion with which others disagree should not be the subject of cancel
culture nor misinterpreted as ‘racist’.
Unless of course it is support for the Palestinians and
anti-Zionism in which case it is ‘anti-Semitic’ and they want it cancelled
immediately as the case of Professor David Miller at Bristol University shows.
They also make the risible claim that pro-Israel supporters
were “nearly lynched” at the
pro-Israel rally last May during the attack on Gaza. Even worse:
‘Many of the anti-Israel
protesters were “visibly of Asian heritage. Why would Jews want to live in a country where there is a high risk of
life-changing injuries simply for holding an Israel flag in the street?”
The BOD issued a statement saying that “The Board of Deputies believes that there
is no place in any Jewish communal organisation for anti-Muslim hatred” which
itself is a lie. The BOD is infested with anti-Arab racists.
Roslyn Pine - the Board were quite prepared to forgive her calling Muslims 'the vilest of animals'
Three
years ago the Board had to suspend
for 6 years Roslyn Pine for describing Arabs as “the vilest of animals.” Three years previous to that Pine had said
that it was a pity that the pro-Palestinian female Swedish foreign minister was
“too old to be raped.” She has also
called fellow deputies “kapos.”
Jewish News
reported
that ‘the Board’s executive ruled that
she could return early if she apologised, showed contrition and expressed
remorse’. Contrast that with the life-time expulsions that the BOD demanded
for Labour members expelled for ‘anti-Semitism’ i.e. anti-Zionism. If the BOD
was at all serious about tackling Islamaphobia in their ranks then they would
have expelled her.
What was
the reaction of her synagogue, Finchley United Synagogue, for whom she is a
Deputy? Did it change its representative? Not at all. The Jewish News reported
that
Finchley
Synagogue will look into the plight of its suspended deputy Roslyn Pine as a
matter of “urgency”. Note that word ‘plight’.
For some strange reason Tommy Robinson and Jonathan Hoffman's solicitor, who is a member of the Board of Deputies, has blocked me
If the Board
were serious about getting rid of its racists it would have to suspend Robert Festenheim, a solicitor and advisor to Tommy Robinson
and Robinson’s solicitor Daniel Berke.
There has been
one voice that has been missing in all this. It is that of Gideon Falter. Not a
word, not a peep, out of someone who sees ‘anti-Semitism’ behind every stone
and pebble. This is not surprising since the CAA has done its best to stir up Jewish-Muslim
discord. It is a
viciously Islamaphobic organisation.
The Open Letter from Young Zionists re Hayek's
Comments come from hypocrites
like Nina Freedman, President of UJS, Joel Rosen, Hannah Rose, ex-UJS
President, and Edward Isaacs, former President of Bristol JSoc, an inveterate liar and Jack Lubner of UJS National Council and
JLM.
These young
supporters of the Israeli Labor Party, which is in government with the
settler-right in Israel, is an example of the hypocrisy of the Zionist ‘left’. They
criticise the trustees of JNF UK for racism but have nothing to say about the
JNF itself.
The JNF is an organisation which
was instrumental in the ethnic cleansing of the Palestinians. In December 1940,
Joseph Weitz, Director of its Lands Settlement Department, wrote in his diary (20.12.40) [Benny Morris,
The Birth of the Palestinian Refugee Problem, p.27):
There is no way besides transferring the Arabs from here to the neighboring countries, and to transfer all of them, save perhaps for [the Arabs of] Bethlehem, Nazareth and Old Jerusalem. Not one village must be left, not one [bedouin] tribe. And only after this transfer will the country be able to absorb millions of our brothers and the Jewish problem will cease to exist. There is no other solution."
What do these young
‘left’ Zionists in UJS/JLM say about the JNF which, at this very moment, is
involved in planting trees on Bedouin land as part of the ‘Judaisation’ of the
Negev? (see below)
The JNF’s work has been firmly entrenched in our
childhoods: many of us have fundraised for the JNF,... we have toured parts of
Israel with the JNF. However, now we are gravely concerned about these comments
and of JNF UK’s complete inaction on the matter. Our communal institutions... have
taught us Jewish values of “loving thy neighbour”, and Hayek’s comments are the
antithesis of this.
These
hypocrites believe that ‘loving thy neighbour’ is compatible with the forcible dispossession
of the Palestinians, the Judaisation of the land and the theft of Palestinian land
for settlements in the West Bank.
I therefore thought it might be instructive to see what this ‘loving thy neighbour’ actually involved. Things like the destruction of the Samarin family home in Jerusalem and the planting of trees over Palestinian villages and now the same exercise in the Negev/Naqab.
What are the Jewish National Fund Up to in the Negev/Naqab?
The
Times of Israel reported
last week on a ‘controversial
tree-planting project by the Jewish National Fund’. Controversial because
the local Bedouin communities protested against the JNF’s afforestation
project, a continuation of its historic mission of using tree planting as a
means of displacing Palestinians, stealing their land and erasing all traces of
Palestinian villages.
There
has been extreme violence by the Israeli police which would never be used
against Jewish demonstrators. The police treat the Bedouin protests as ‘potential “terror incidents” with a
nationalistic motive.’ Only Jewish nationalism is allowed in Israel. The
terror, which is all too real, is the terror of being displaced from your home
and forcibly transferred to a township as happened to Black South Africans under
Apartheid.
Note
how the resistance of Israeli Palestinians to efforts to ethnic cleansing is classified
as “terrorism”. Attacks by settlers
are never described in such terms. Even
Israel’s Army Radio noted
that the
JNF had not
consulted with police or other law enforcement bodies prior to starting the
forestation project.
Nor
did they consult the Bedouin of al-Atrash and other ‘unrecognised’ villages. The
Times of Israel described
how:
Negev Bedouin have a
contentious relationship with the state. For decades, the government has sought
to move them into recognized, planned cities, but many still live in a
constellation of illegal hamlets that sprawl across Israel’s southern desert.
Bedouins
accuse JNF of seeking to displace them, but the organization says it is merely
fulfilling a request by other government bodies on public land. JNF works
across Israel on nature and conservation projects
The
‘illegal hamlets’ are the villages
where the Bedouin have lived before the State of Israel was founded. No Jewish
villages are ever termed ‘illegal’. Note the reference to ‘public land’. This
is a euphemism for Jewish National Land.
Far from the JNF’s Greenwashing preserving the environment
it is destroying it
The
ToI described
how
Those with
ideological objections call it colonialist, and environmentalists call it
harmful because it has allowed a single species to spread unchecked,
diminishing biodiversity and increasing the risk of forest fires.
The
latter is a reference to the JNF practice of planting non-native pine which has
enabled wildfires to spread rapidly.
The
colonialism claims have resurfaced periodically in international media as part
of their coverage of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, linking forestation to
the “Judaization” of previously Arab-owned land.
In fact
the Israeli government drew up the Prawer Plan specifically
aimed at Judaisation. Yaakov Franko, a lawyer specialising in landscape
legislation claimed:
the trees, mostly Aleppo pines,
are an invasive species and that each pine tree is like a gallon of petrol. The
sap, the needles, the acorns, the trunks burn rapidly, spreading through the
broken limbs near the root system, where no other plants can grow and moisten.
That’s why a single cigarette
butt can light up the area between Hadera and Gedera,” he continued, naming
cities at opposite ends of Israel’s center.
Far
from benefiting the environment the JNF’s tree planting is causing
environmental destruction. As befits European colonisers the JNF
boasts about the
Europe-like feel of its forests. One promotional article on their website from
2013 declares that Germany’s Black Forest “has
got nothing on us.” And many hikers enjoy them. On a recent Saturday,
Daniel Kobi, a father of two from Kiryat Ata, told the Jewish Telegraphic
Agency that he enjoys coming to the forest named for his suburb of Haifa
because “it feels like the Swiss Alps
right around the corner” from his home.
The
ToI claimed
that
While JNF did
use some invasive species, including the eucalyptus from Australia, the Aleppo
pine has grown in Israel for millennia.
Except
that Israel has only existed since 1948, hardly a century let alone a
millennium. The reference is to the small city state Israel that existed in the
10th Century BC, 3,000 years ago. But I forget. Palestine was a “land without a people for a people without
a land”. In other words its people were invisible. To the colonialists
indigenous people were always invisible. As even the Toi admits:
With their large crowns,
Aleppo pines leave very little sunlight for lower shrubs. And they shed a thick
blanket of needles that prevents the growth of most plants, and almost all of
the flowers gracing the Israeli countryside — including its 30 species of orchids
and 16 Iris species.
This means
that the forests planted by JNF tend to have a much lower biodiversity than
naturally occurring Mediterranean forests that nurture a multitude of insects,
reptiles, birds and mammals.
The
JNF give the game away when they said
that
the tree
planting began as an effort to “demonstrate ownership” over non-urban
Jewish-owned land that could not be farmed.
In
other words the JNF’s tree planting activities has nothing to do with the
environment and everything to do with ‘demonstrating
ownership’, Jewish ownership i.e. theft of Bedouin land.
Dozens of
Palestinians in the Naqab (Negev) have been injured and arrested, as Israeli
police attacked protests against the JNF that is threatening the livelihood of
Bedouin communities in the area.
The
protests are focused in the al-Naqe area of the Naqab, a fertile area of land
in the desert, which is home to around 30,000 Palestinians living in a cluster
of several Bedouin villages.
Since
December the JNF has been razing Palestinian lands and uprooting trees
belonging to Bedouin communities in order to prepare the area for forestation.
The JNF’s
campaign in the Naqab, with the full assistance of the Israeli police, has
sparked widespread protests by Palestinian Bedouin communities in the area, who
say the forestation campaign is just another effort to dispossess them from
their land.
Videos
and photos on social media have shown Israeli forces teargassing and violently
detaining protesters, as well as demolishing tents in the area.
Middle
East Eye reported that Israeli police have arrested at
least 35 Palestinians from the Sa’awa and al-Atrash villages. Al Jazeera reported that more than 80 Palestinians,
including minors, have been detained since the protests began.
Local
media also reported Israeli police setting up checkpoints and blocking the
entrances and exits to villages in the area in order to prevent people from
attending the protests, which have swelled in recent days, and which have
sparked solidarity protests in other Palestinian cities in Israel.
A history of violence & displacement
The Naqab makes up around half of Israel’s entire land mass,
and is home to an estimated 300,000 Palestinian Bedouins who hold a nominal
Israeli citizenship.
The Bedouins living in the Naqab are the descendants of those
who remained after an estimated 80,000-90,000 Bedouins were forced to flee the
area during the Nakba in 1948.
Around half of the Bedouins reside in 40 “unrecognized”
villages, which Israel calls “illegal clusters.” Despite the fact that many of
the Bedouins are living on the ancestral homelands, while others were
internally displaced after 1940, Israel views them as “trespassers” and does
not recognize their ownership over the land.
Due to their “unrecognized” status, Israel does not offer the
Bedouins living in these communities any services and they are excluded from
state planning. That means they have no local councils, are offered
little-to-no government services in terms of education and sanitation, and are
not connected to the electric grids or water networks.
Because they are considered “illegal”, these communities are under
constant threat of demolition, with Israel having destroyed some villages close to
200 times.
For decades the state has aimed to remove these communities
from their homes and put them in planned residential areas, which rights groups
say amounts to forcible transfer, a war crime under international law. All the
while, Israel has invested billions of shekels to develop and promote Jewish
settlement in the area.
The JNF: Colonialism disguised as environmentalism
Founded
in 1901 as a non-governmental organization, the JNF was established to purchase
land for European Jews to settle in Palestine, in order to create and maintain
a Jewish-majority state.
The JNF purports
to be an environmental organisation. Its tree-planting initiatives are designed
to cover up the ethnic cleansing of Palestine. Today that means actively
dispossessing Palestinian communities in the Negev.
The areas
where the JNF plants its forests are often the sites of destroyed Palestinian
villages which the JNF aims to erase any trace of. Today the JNF owns an
estimated 15% of all Israeli land.
In
occupied East Jerusalem, the JNF has been tied to shadowy purchases of
Palestinian homes which the organization then turns over to Israeli settler
groups. In the West Bank the JNF purchases privately owned Palestinian land in
Area C — where Palestinians are not allowed to build — for settlement expansion
and construction.
The group
has worked with the Israeli government to make it nearly impossible for the
country’s Palestinian citizens to gain access to state lands for residential,
commercial and agricultural use. In the Negev the group has advocated for the
destruction of Palestinian Bedouin villages in order to plant trees as part of
its “Ambassadors Forest” initiative.
See What’s happening in the Naqab? Israel uproots Palestinians to plant trees
Planting a monoculture of pines at close spacing was always asking for trouble. There are of course several indigenous broadleaved trees which could have been used to make a more robust ecological mixture. This includes a number of oaks such as the attractive Quercus calliprinos. But perhaps ardent Zionists would find objection in using a species with the common name of 'Palestine oak' in their Jewish plantations.
ReplyDeleteTo me the use of pine was simply because they grow fast thus achieving JNF aims quicker.
ReplyDelete