Help Us Build a Socialist Movement by Organising Grassroots CLPs
To attend the meeting please first
join either:
https://membermojo.co.uk/labouragainstthewitchhunt
(£10 waged/£5 unwaged)
At the end of November All Members Meetings of Labour-in-Exile-Network and Labour Against the Witchhuntt voted to merge into a single organisation.
LIEN members voted by 4-1 and Labour Against the
Witchhunt members voted, despite vociferous opposition from Labour Party
Marxism/Communist Party of Great Britain
members 47-27 to do likewise.
Ian Hodson, Guest Speaker and President of the Bakers Union
The founding meeting of the new organisation was to
have been on December 17. Unfortunately too many people tried to get in! Our
Zoom facility only catered for 100. We have ensured that this time around up to
500 people will be accommodated so, just to make sure you get in, please sign
in early!
Name
The Steering Committee has proposed that the name of the new organisation should be Socialist Labour Network (LAW/LIEN). There are however 7 other proposals and you can find them all here
The Witchhunt
It is or should be obvious that it is impossible
to fight against the witchhunt inside the Labour Party. The
reason is very simple. As Ken Loach put it ‘democracy
is dead inside the Labour Party.’ If you put your head above the parapet it
is chopped off by some anonymous bureaucrat. An insidious culture of informing
has been cultivated that is modelled on the Stasi and Gestapo.
Anonymous nerds, incapable of constructing a single coherent
sentence or having an original thought don't have to face the task of explaining
their reactionary politics. All they have to do is send an email to Labour’s Disputes Team fingering someone
and the suspension letter will go out the next day.
You might not thing that Starmer and his clones have
a sense of humour but you would be wrong. Virtually every candidate for
suspension/expulsion accused of ‘anti-Semitism’ was also accused of ‘undermining
Labour’s campaign against racism.’ You may indeed wonder what this fight
consists of given the number of Jewish and Black/Muslim members expelled.
However in the Orwellian world of Starmer and Evans fulsome support for Israeli
Apartheid is compatible with fighting racism!
Sonali at the Labour Grassroots meeting on January 2nd
If anyone has any doubts about the fear and
cowardice of what’s left of the Left in the Labour Party about fighting Starmer and
the Witchhunt then all you need to do is to watch Sonali Bhattacharyya, co-Chair of Momentum. Sonali who appeared on Labour
Grassroots on 2nd January. Sonali reacted with a mixture of arrogance and
affront to peoples' criticism.
Crispin got off to a bad start when he asked Sonali
about Momentum’s strategy to fight what is happening in the Labour Party and to
make it more attractive. So badly did she take the criticism that she has told
Crispin Flint, the genial compare of the show, that she will have nothing to do
with him or Labour Grassroots ever again.
Sonali Bhattacharyya
When asked why Momentum has failed to campaign
against the witchhunt or support expelled members, which Jackie Walker
challenged her on, she simply refused to answer parroting the statement that
Momentum has supported hundreds of members legally. Even if this is true, and
it is open to doubt since no one will admit to having been helped, this is insufficient.
Legal help on an individual basis is not the same as
campaigning to end the expulsions, the witchhunt and Starmer himself. Momentum
have failed to make it clear that Starmer, Evans and his neo-Blairite strategy is the
enemy. They have been cowed into silence. Nearly 2 years ago Sonali and Forward
Momentum ousted Lansman’s cronies in the elections. Since then they have
maintained a Trappist Silence. They have neither been seen, heard or said
anything of note.
Labour Against the Witchhunt
I was the only 1 of 6 members of the LAW Steering
Committee to support the merger. Subsequently 4 of them penned a statement Why we resigned.
To his credit Steve Price, although part of the majority that opposed the merger refused to sign that statement. Steve is now standing for the new Committee. I hope that he is elected. Those
who decided not merely to throw their toys out of the pram but to junk the pram
altogether justified their decision by writing:
We cannot
support the view that the struggle against the Labour witch-hunt is over, or
that “LAW has outlived its usefulness”, as Tony Greenstein, the proposer of the
motion to merge, put it.
The problem is I never said anything of the sort! What I did say was that LAW had outlived its
usefulness, but they are not one and the same thing. The fight against Labour’s
witchhunt will be carried out largely outside
the Labour Party and in the unions. Organising within the Labour Party is not
possible and that is why nearly 2/3 of LAW members supported my motion.
There has been a considerable debate in the pages of Weekly Worker despite their annoying habit of using headlines and subheadlines, not to describe my articles but to attack them! Innovative journalism. See at the bottom for details of the various articles and statements.
The meeting will be
opened by Ian Hodson, the expelled
President of the Bakers' Union. In addition to adopting a new name we will be electing
a new Steering Committee. The joint Steering Committee of LAW/LIEN is proposing
that the Committee should be 10 strong. There will be 17 candidates for the
positions.
To participate in the
meeting, you have to be a paid-up member of either group. To join, you can
sign up via this link: https://membermojo.co.uk/lien.
We intend to build and network shadow socialist CLPs as part of our local campaigning work.
Agenda
RECONVENED FIRST ALL MEMBERS’ MEETING OF LAW WITH LIEN
14th January 2022
By ZOOM
1 |
18:00 |
Meeting begins/final entry checks |
2 |
18:05 |
Welcome from Chair of Meeting (Esther) |
3 |
18:10 |
Speaker
to be confirmed |
4 |
18:20 |
Debate to inform formulation of Aims and Priorities Aims and priorities of the consolidated organisation here (Norman to introduce) Member discussion
(contributions no more than 3 minutes) Draft Priorities to inform debate and based on interim discussion with members and joint steering committee Priorty 1: Opposition to witch-hunt here Priority 2: Establishment of Shadow CLPs and networks here Priority 3: Education Programme (for future agreement) |
5 |
19:20 |
Name of Consolidated Organisation: SC proposal: “Socialist Labour
Network (LAW with LIEN)” Proposed
by Roger Silverman Further
proposed names to be included in poll- to be returned to SC by cop 12th Jan.
Updated list here Proposers
to have one minute to speak. Members
to vote for their preferred name (1 vote) |
6 |
19:30 |
Election of Steering Committee. Nomination statements here. Data protection role to be assigned by the new steering committee. Each nominee is allocated 1 minute to speak. Zoom poll. |
7 |
19:50 |
Next Steps |
8 |
20:00 |
Meeting Close |
Proposed standing Orders
Voting
1.. Please
click ‘Raise Hand’ if you want to speak (either in ‘Participants’ on the right
hand side or ‘Reactions’ on the bottom of your screen). Alternatively write ‘I
want to speak’ in the Chat.
3. For items
4, 5 and 6, we intend to use ZOOM polls. If you want to vote, we recommend that
you have access to a device of your own. If this is not possible (and you are
sharing a device), we will count manually raised hands.
Points of Order
1. Attendees
are urged to raise points of order only when necessary and reasonable.
Attendees can raise points of order regarding conduct or procedures by pressing
the blue thumbs down button (under
‘More’ at the bottom of the ‘Participants’ panel). Alternatively, describe your
point of order in the Chat window.
2. The Chair’s
ruling on any point arising from the rules or standing orders is final unless
challenged by not less than two members; such a challenge shall be put to the
meeting and be carried with a simple majority of those voting at the meeting.
Emergency motions
1. Emergency
motions may be accepted at the discretion of the chair (decisions on admitting
emergency motions can be overturned by a simple majority of conference).
2. We will
accept new amendments to emergency motions only. Please write them down and
present them in the ‘Chat’ window, with a clear indication of where it should
go.
Discussion on the Merger in Weekly Worker
I thought Crispin's chairing of this discussion was awful. He allowed the Momentum spokesperson an enormous chunk of time to vent her irritation at being criticised, and then allowed her to repeatedly interrupt the polite Jackie Walker.
ReplyDeleteHi John. I disagree. I think Crispin gave her enough rope to hang herself. And she did with her petulant display. Crispin has his own inimitable style which I think works. I've a lot of respect for him because his non-sectarian approach has made Labour Grassroots a must attend event. And for me, getting up at 10.30 on Sunday is not easy!!
DeleteI think that LIEN/ Labour against the Witchhunt should form a New Political Party because Starmer and his cronies have voted with Boris against Tory Rebels. Boris and Starmer have become a ONE Party State. The last By-Election with the Lib-Dem Victory proves that the UK Voter is Sick of the Status Quo.
ReplyDeleteI think it would be premature to form a party now. We need a socialist movement not another party.
ReplyDeleteI absolutely agree, its the strength of resistance that matters, through a mass movement, knowledge is power, and the more that know the more powerful.
DeleteI am currently wondering whether it's down to the realisation that people in the country generally have become aware of the duplicity of the establishment, that Johnson has now so universally fallen out of favour, or just that their core vote is melting away.
I get a sense that people not generally known for their interest in political events have a better understanding than we might give them credit for, noting that a journalist on the BBC has just issued an apology to Jeremy Corbyn for allowing a Tory Sponsor to get away with calling him an anti-Semite, and went to great pains to explain that there is absolutely no evidence anywhere that that he is.
My point about these recent admissions doesn't of course mean that they have been converted to now standing up against wrongs done in the past, but feel it's of course safe to admit it as the ultimate objective has been achieved, in that as you said from the beginning, Jeremy Corbyn was always the target.
Listening to comments made by people in the street when interviewed these days, a lot of ordinary Labour supporters say they don't have confidence in Starmer, so I would be hopeful that a challenge is possible to oust Starmer, because many Labour MPs could feel vulnerable going into an election with him.