Please don’t thank us for putting our trust in you We don’t trust you!
I was sent this letter
out of the blue from Bronagh Wilson, who lives in the north of Ireland.
Ireland, like Palestine and India, was the victim of British colonialism and
its favourite 'solution' - Partition.
 |
| British troops searching Palestinians under the Mandate |
What I like about this
letter is that it sets racism in its proper context. Maybe that is not surprising. The Irish, like
the Palestinians, know all about the racism that accompanies settler
colonialism. The Northern Ireland statelet was, for 50 years, an apartheid
state like Israel. Sectarianism was part of its DNA. In the words
of Ulster Prime Minister, Lord Craigavon, 'All I boast of is that we are a Protestant
Parliament and a Protestant State'.
“What the Holocaust teaches us is that
anybody, given the right set of circumstances can become a victim or
perpetrator”
There is no racial or religious monopoly on victim status. Racism
is a product of society not biology or religion.
For the past 4 years Jews
have been the weapon of choice in the arsenal of the Labour Right and the
British Establishment as they fought to be rid of Corbyn. Who would have
guessed that the Sun and the Mail would become ardent opponents of ‘anti-Semitism’?
The same newspapers which employed
Katie Hopkins as a columnist!
Jews provided a moral
ballast and a sense of righteousness in the battle against Corbyn that supporting
cuts and austerity lacked. Just as when the British went to India they did it
to fight Suttee,
the practice of burning Hindu women on the funeral pyres of their husbands, not
because they wanted to exploit the Indian peasant. At least according to imperial mythology.
 |
| Starmer's Act of Surrender to Zionism and the Israel Lobby is pathetic in its subservience of the party of labour to racism and reaction |
The 'anti-Semitism'
campaign was based on the idea that Jews are an oppressed group despite being twice
as likely to be in social classes A and B as their non-Jewish counterparts.
[Geoffrey Alderman, The Jewish Community in British Politics p.137]. This is the poisonous legacy of identity
politics, in which the oppressor and oppressed are treated as equal.
 |
| This is who Keir Starmer is climbing into bed with |
Jews were treated as
one homogenous ‘minority’. In the words
of Jonathan Freedland, who excludes anti-racist and anti-Zionist Jews from his
strictures:
black people are usually
allowed to define what’s racism; women can define sexism; Muslims are trusted
to define Islamophobia. But when Jews call out something as antisemitic,
leftist non-Jews feel curiously entitled to tell Jews they’re wrong,
 |
| Sir Oswald Moseley, Britain's wannabee Hitler |
Freedland forgot that
Black people don't need to define racism. It is what they experience. Jews when
they experienced state or fascist anti-Semitism didn't need a 500+ word IHRA
definition. My father didn't need a definition of anti-Semitism in order to
combat Sir Oswald Moseley's British Union of Fascists when he took part in the
1936 Battle
of CableStreet.
And strangely enough
the Board of Deputies, which is so opposed to ‘anti-Semitism’ today opposed
anti-fascist mobilisations against Moseley, the Battle of Cable Street in the
1930’s and the Anti-Nazi League campaign against the National Front in the 1970’s.
But if you are using
Jewish identity in order to stigmatise criticism of Israel, then a definition
of 'anti-Semitism' that incorporates Zionism and Israel is essential. This is
the nonsense of identity politics. Even
the most reactionary forms of identity are equally valid. A supporter of apartheid, if they can claim an
‘ethnic’ identity status is equally valid as those living under the lash.
No-one has a ‘right’
to define racism to the exclusion of anyone else. Especially when your self-definition involves
the oppression and exclusion of others or a denial of their rights to their own
land. Racism is a function of class, the division of labour and colonialism. Being a minority doesn’t make you oppressed
or Britain’s billionaires would be the most oppressed of all minorities. Not
only are British Jews not oppressed most of them identify with the oppressor.
The Jews of the East
End who in 1945 contributed
half of Phil Piratin’s vote, the first Communist to be elected to Parliament
in England, for the constituency of Mile End, are not the Jews of today’s Golders
Green.
A lot has been said
about how few Jews voted Labour under Corbyn. But even under Ed Miliband,
Labour’s only Jewish leader, just 14%
voted Labour. As Robert Philpot wrote in The Spectator (18.4.15.)
“Community activists
believe Miliband’s position on Israel has become such a sticking point that
many Jews who traditionally vote Labour can’t bring themselves to do so.”
If you didn’t know
better you might imagine that British Jews were huddled up in their East End
ghetto, living in fear of the Corbyn hordes.
Defining criticism of
Israel and anti-Zionism as anti-Semitism means making Zionism an inherent part
of Jewish identity and excluding anti-Zionist Jews. It means identifying
British Jews with everything Israel does, which is anti-Semitic, even according
to the IHRA!
It also means that
Palestinians are defined as ‘anti-Semitic’ for opposing Zionist settler
colonialism. According to the IHRA Palestinians protesting the demolition of
their homes are being anti-Semitic if they accuse Israel of racism! Identity
politics in practice amounts to a form of White racism.
If 30 years ago there
had been a substantial White South African population in Britain who identified
with Apartheid, it would then have been racist to oppose Apartheid according to
the 'forensic mind' of Keir Starmer.
Israel proves that any
group of people can become victims or perpetrators. No better example could be
provided than the settlement of Liberia, of which this is the 200th anniversary.
This was a form of Black Zionism and those who colonised Liberia became its
ruling elite dominating Liberian society and excluding its indigenous
population from power. As Angela Thompsell writes
in this month’s History Today:
 |
| members of the Liberian senate |
For slave owners, free
black populations were a direct threat: their existence undermined the
justifications for slavery and owners feared a slave uprising. Many white
people who were ambivalent about, or even opposed to, slavery also feared the
growing number of free black people who they saw, in the words of ACS
co-founder Clay, as ‘useless and pernicious’, a threat to the security,
prosperity and culture of the US. Some saw the prospect of a large, free black
population as one of the chief obstacles to emancipation.
Just as Zionism and
Jewish colonialism was seen as the antidote to Jewish participation in
revolutionary movements, so the settlement of Liberia was seen as the solution
to the ‘problem’ of free American Blacks. These schemes of colonisation were
overwhelmingly opposed by American Blacks.
‘Just three weeks after the
ACS was founded, black activists organised a protest in Philadelphia, which
drew 3,000 people, and only 138 northern free blacks chose to emigrate to
Liberia between 1820 and 1830.’
In Britain Arthur the Zionist hero 'Bloody' Balfour began his infamous career with the shooting
of 3 demonstrators in Mitchelstown, County Cork. As Prime Minister he introduced
the 1905 Aliens Act, which aimed at keeping Jewish refugees out of Britain. In
1917 he sponsored Zionist settlement in Palestine with his infamous Balfour
Declaration.
In so far as British
Jews identify with Zionism and the Israeli state it is a reactionary identity. Opposition
to that identity is, by definition, anti-racist. It is no accident that ‘Sir’
Keir identifies with the most
reactionary and racist section of British Jews.
This is at one with
the naked class collaborationist politics of Starmer. When he said
that
“Whether we voted for this
government or not, we all rely on it to get this right. That’s why in the
national interest the Labour party will play its full part.”
There is no national
interest. The interests of the poor and working class are diametrically opposed
to that of Boris Johnson and the Tories.
Starmer is just another Tony Blair, minus the personality.
Below is Bronagh
Wilson's letter to Starmer:
 |
| Bronagh Wilson with Chris Williamson |
Letter to Sir Keir from a
newly resigned member of the Labour Party
Dear Sir Keir (don’t fret, I’m
genuflecting as I type) and Angela,
you have absolutely no need to thank
me for “putting my trust in you” as
nothing could be further from the truth and, in fact, I cancelled my DD within
10 minutes of learning the result.
I must say that it has been an
extraordinary and enlightening few years. I have now learnt that the two things you are
not allowed to be in a “democratic socialist party” are democratic or
socialist. War criminal or friend to
Russian oligarchs and paedophile pimps, no problem.
Furthermore, I have learnt that
anti-racism is not something to be lauded or promoted but something to be
cynically employed by racists to destroy anti racists.
Equally, I have learnt that the bulk
of the PLP are vile, self-serving, self-entitled vacuous nonentities who would
shame a convention of professional fraudsters. At last, and to my great relief, I don’t have
to sacrifice my own integrity by having any connection whatsoever with the
likes of Tom Watson, Wes Streeting, Ian Austin (God help us all), Margaret
Hodge, John Mann, Louise Ellman, Joan Ryan, Jess Phillips (giving Hazel Blears
a run for her money in the most objectionable female ever to sully the Party in
the unspeakable futility and vacuity stakes).
I could go on at great length but I’m
sure you get the picture. The Labour Party had one chance and one chance only
to save itself from the terminal death spiral it was determined to pursue. And for nothing other than the very narrow
self interest of the utterly useless but pernicious degenerates who mainly
populate the Labour benches, you have eschewed that chance and destroyed the
hopes of the majority who you pretend to represent. The Labour Party is now an embodiment of
ignominy and a rancid, noisome, rotting, corpse that needs burying, for the
sake of human decency, as soon as possible.
Believe me when I state that I would far
rather not be in a position to say “told you so” but your collective lack of
imagination and integrity and inability to learn anything from experience means
that that is an inevitability. We are
now expected to return to the merry go round of blue Tory, red Tory and be
content with that?
The year 1997 is long gone and is not
coming back. The world is careering
towards a dystopian nightmare, the like of which has rarely if ever been seen,
and what do the likes of you and your colleagues have to offer as a solution? Do you really believe that cretins of the
calibre of those mentioned above (and many others beside) have the slightest
idea how the coming storms can be negotiated or ameliorated? Do you really?
One of my earliest politically
informative experiences, one that motivated me to be a socialist, was learning
about the Holocaust. The most crucial
lesson I took from that awareness was that the completely irrational nature of
that horrific stain on humanity’s history meant that any of us, in the right
circumstances, could similarly be victimised. And, equally importantly, any of us could be
the victimisers.
The fact, for example, that in the
instance of the Holocaust, Jews were the primary (but not only) victims does
not for one moment mean that Jewish communities could not themselves harbour
racists in their midst. And your
“friends” in the BoD, the JLM and the LFoI, in their unswerving promotion and
support for the definitive racism that is Zionism, seem to be determined to
prove the second point.
The Holocaust wasn’t deplorable
because it was Jews who were victims it was deplorable because they were human
beings. It may have been the greatest
crime in history but it has some stiff competition for that accolade. Or perhaps you have never troubled yourselves
to look into the reality of black African slavery in the Americas. An obscenity, beyond adequate description,
that lasted for hundreds of years. Try
visiting the Slavery Museum in Liverpool and see how long you can last without
retching with disgust. All racism is
equally repugnant and wrong, both morally and factually. But to promote a hierarchy of racism is
nothing more than an act of racism in itself.
For the record: Jews, scattered
around the world as they are, do not have the right to self determination in
Palestine, or any other country in which they are not already residing. The only people who have the right to self-determination
in Palestine are the Palestinians, whether they be Jewish, Christian or Muslim.
Jews from Europe, North Africa or
elsewhere arriving in Palestine, and ethnically cleansing the existing
population because they covet their land, are not exercising their
self-determination they are exercising colonialism. It may have been unfortunate for the
ethno-nationalists of the Zionist movement that they only succeeded at the same
time as colonialism had become anathema, but that is tough luck.
Colonialism always was, and still is,
an abhorrence, which is quite rightly now spurned as completely unacceptable. Using the argument that Jews are uniquely
singled out to be denied the same right to exercise their self-determination as
other people is an offensive absurdity when their “self-determination” depends
upon the ethnic cleansing of the long existing population. To pretend that objections to the Zionist
takeover of Palestine must solely be motivated by antisemitism is offensive in
the extreme. Or, to further the analogy,
which black or brown people would you deem to be acceptable targets for ethnic
cleansing in order to provide for the self-determination of Gypsies, Roma or
Jehovah’s Witnesses? All of whom were
also targeted by the Nazis and still endure widespread discrimination and
persecution.
I don’t really believe that you Sir
Keir (genuflecting while typing), with your “forensic” mind, need to have
explained to you why two wrongs don’t make a right. So I can only conclude that your shameful
grovelling to the racist Board of Deputies is an acute demonstration of your
utter bad faith. But why talk of shame
where there is no conscience?
I have to admit that the apparatchiks
and core of the PLP are certainly on trend with their adoption and promotion of
the black is white, up is down, war is peace narratives that are so de rigueur these days. The two of you may not have been the most
prominent culprits in the obsessive and deranged campaign to destroy the most
decent man in political life, for a generation at least, to endlessly accuse a
lifelong campaigner against racism of embodying the most egregious racism, to
attack good, Jewish, socialists for being antisemites (risible if it weren’t so
serious) but I think it safe to say that your low profile on the issues was
motivated more by an eye on the main chance rather than a matter of any
principle.
Principle, in this context? Don’t be ridiculous. The world is in an extremely precarious state,
the future will not be pretty if we continue with this current trajectory. What we definitely do not need is the likes of
you two, David Miliband, Tony Blair, Peter Mandelson and all their cronies who
infest the Party (in particular its machine and the bulk of the PLP) with their
arrogant, self-entitled, mendacious inversion of the truth, to assume control
of the political discourse at the expense of truth and social justice.
I really am perplexed as to where you
think you’ll be going with this. You
will never win back Scotland, “northern heartlands” – forget it. You’re obviously banking on once again being
allowed to be the Tory B team while the real article regroups and refreshes for
its next assault on society. In this
triumphally Goebbelian era, it is actually you who are the racists, you who are
utterly indifferent to the truth. Faux
outrage about racism is just a tool that can be used to smear socialists into
silence and oblivion.
I think you Sir, knight of the realm,
forensically minded Keir (genuflecting etc) must be delighted with the hearty
endorsement of George Osborne; what an accolade. He certainly believes that the preservation of
the status quo is firmly secured. And
who could argue with that? The Labour Party is now dead, it has ceased to be,
it is bereft of life. You and your fellow
travellers disgust me and it is time you PASOKed right off!. “Put my
trust in you”? You certainly have a
warped sense of humour, I’ll grant you that much!
Bronagh Wilson
former Labour Party Member, Armagh
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please submit your comments below