Israeli Doctors are Actively
Complicit in Aiding and Abetting Torture but according to Emily Thornberry that
IS WHY Israel a ‘beacon of freedom’
According to Emily
Thornberry “Modern Israel is a beacon of freedom,
equality and democracy”. Israel is also the only state in the world where
torture is legal. See It’s
now (even more) official: torture is legal in Israel
In 1987 the Landau Commission,
which was set up as a result of the Bus 300 Affair, when
two Palestinian prisoners were murdered by senior officers (one General Yitzhak
Mordechai was later promoted to Command of the Southern Region), found that
the use of violence, or ‘moderate
physical pressure’ as they termed it, against prisoners was an acceptable
method of interrogation. They argued, in the light of what they called "the concept of the lesser evil",
that
 |
| Elyakim Rubinstein, Supreme Court Justice who approved of the use of torture |
"actual torture . . . would
be perhaps be justified in order to uncover a bomb about to explode in a
building full of people . . . whether the charge is certain to be detonated in
five minutes or in five days."
"To put it bluntly, the
alternative is: are we to accept the offence of assault entailed in slapping a
suspect's face, or threatening him, in order to induce him to talk and reveal a
cache of explosive materials meant for use in carrying an act of mass terror
against a civilian population, and there by prevent the greater evil which is
about to occur? The answer is self evident."[15]
This was the justification that the Nazis used for torture. Defence of
the State against its enemies. Chaired by Supreme Court Judge Moshe Landua, the Commission's Report stated:
 |
| Israeli torture victim |
"The effective interrogation
of terrorist suspects is impossible without the use of means of pressure, in
order to overcome an obdurate will not to disclose information and to overcome
the fear of the person under interrogation that harm will befall him from his
own organization, if he does reveal information."[16]
"The means of pressure
should principally take the form of non-violent psychological pressure through
a vigorous and extensive interrogation, with the use of stratagems, including
acts of deception. However, when these do not attain their purpose, the
exertion of a moderate measure of physical pressure cannot be avoided."
In 1999 the Supreme
Court, sitting as the High Court, ruled
in Public Committee Against Torture in Israel v the
Government of Israel, PD 73(4) 817 (1999) that the law does not permit the
use of torture. However they also ruled that in a ‘ticking bomb’ case the use
of such methods might not cause the
torturers to be legally culpable.
Prof.
Yuval Shany explained in Back to the
‘Ticking Bomb’ Doctrine how the decision of Israel’s High
Court in December 2017 in Abu Ghosh v. Attorney-General effectively
reinvigorated the ‘ticking time bomb’ defence of Israel’s torturers.
The result
is, as Btselem documents, that
Shin Bet have continued to use torture as a routine method of interrogation with
the connivance of the Israel’s Supreme Court. Since 1967 73 prisoners have been
tortured to death.
Last
December a Report from Addameer, the Palestinian Prisoner Support Unit and
Legal Aid Group stated that
The
occupation authorities, in particular, the Israeli intelligence agency “Shabak”
resorts to torture and ill-treatment as standard operating procedure in a
systematic and wide-scale approach against Palestinian detainees. Over the past
three months, the intelligence agency subjected a number of detainees at
Israeli interrogation centers to severe physical and psychological torture
without any form of monitoring and protection.
The reaction
of the Israeli state to Addameer’s Report was to impose a ‘gag order’ preventing
them from printing details of the case of torture. This too, as Emily will explain is another example of Israeli democracy at its best!
Other
examples include 21-year-old Palestinian student Mays Abu Ghosh who is currently
in an Israeli jail cell and a victim of torture. Mays, who was arrested for her
activism, has been interrogated so violently that her parents could barely
recognize her – yet this horrific story is being met with no huge outcry and
very little media attention.
On August
29, Mays was arrested in her home during a sweep of Palestinian student
activists and detained under trumped-up charges.
 |
| Demonstration protesting at the death under torture of Arafat Jaradat in an Israeli G4S prison |
As a student
journalist, Mays has been a vocal advocate of Palestinian rights. Now she’s
being tortured for her lifelong resistance to displacement, and being labeled a
“major terrorist” for her work organizing with fellow students against Israeli
oppression of Palestinians. Her “crimes” include participating in a conference
about the Palestinian right of return in Lebanon, and speaking about her late
brother on a radio program.
When her
parents were finally allowed to visit, Mays was so bruised and visibly wounded
she was almost unrecognizable. Her mother couldn’t hug her because her body was
in too much pain.
Addameer describes some of the torture techniques:
 |
| The Banana Position - Israel's own invention |
·
Positional torture (stress positions): Israeli intelligence officers forced the detainees
into a number of stress positions such as the banana position,[2] the frog
position, sitting on an imaginary chair, squatting and many other different
positions. Almost in all of these stress positions, the detainees would lose
their balance and fall on the ground, which would lead to a harsh beating by
the officers and then forcing the detainee back into the stress position. Other
used stress positions included standing on their toes while their hands were
shackled above their heads to a wall. Another position included sitting on a
chair while handcuffed to the back, where the hands were positioned on a table
behind the detainee’s chair. A third position involved the detainee laying on
the ground with his/her hands chained to each other with iron cuffs and
positioned behind his/her back. This position also includes officers sitting on
the detainee to place pressure on his/her body while beat him/her ferociously.
 |
| Illustrative use of torture |
·
Harsh beatings: Israeli occupation
intelligence officers used extreme methods of beatings against the detainees
using their hands, legs, knees and even their fingers. The officers hit,
slapped, punched, poked (using their fingers), and kicked the detainees. These
methods resulted in severe and life-threatening injuries that included broken
ribs, inability to walk, brutal bruises, swelling marks on the skin, ulcer
wounds…etc. The officers, who exceeded five in number in some cases used to
blindfold the detainees’ eyes so they would not expect the beating or know
where it is coming from. Several of those detainees appeared in their court
sessions with marks on their bodies, expressing severe pain, or in some cases
arrived on wheelchairs. In one of the cases, the harsh beating was committed
with the intention to kill the detainee, who was in fact transferred to the
hospital in serious condition after around 30 hours of severe and extreme
methods of beatings. In another case, the harsh beating aimed at injuries
caused by a police dog during the arrest, the interrogators intended to target
those previously obtained injuries, which were mainly on the detainee’s genital
area causing the wounds to re-open twice. Also, in many other cases, the method
of pulling the facial hair from its roots causing injuries and swelling marks
was used.
 |
| An actor plays the role of torture victim |
·
Sleep deprivation: this technique was implemented through different
methods, in some cases the detainees spent around twenty days sleeping from one
to three hours a day. Even when those detainees were sent to their cells to
sleep, they would be disturbed with loud and eerie sounds made by the prison
guards, the voices of other detainees being harshly beaten or the sound of
knocking on their cell doors. In some cases, sleep deprivation ranged from 30
to 60 continuous hours, where the detainee would not be sent to sleep at all
during these hours and would be woken up if he/she falls asleep during the
interrogation. Some detainees were harshly slapped on their faces to wake up,
others were also splashed with water. Detainees described the slaps as
extremely severe causing them to feel dizzy.
·
The
use of family members (emotional blackmailing): psychological torture and
ill-treatment were used on the majority of these detainees, focusing on threats
against their family members, and loved ones. Israeli occupation forces used
the policy of collective punishment through arresting and bringing in some of
the family members mostly to al-Mascobiyya interrogations center and Ofer
prison. Eight family members for seven different detainees were arrested, and
another ten family members were brought in for questioning. Some of these
relatives were kept for a number of days while others were kept for hours. In
all the cases, family members and loved ones were mainly brought in to pressure
the detainees themselves. The interrogators made the detainees assume that
their relatives got arrested and will be tortured as well. Relatives included
fathers, mothers, brothers, daughters, wives, etc.
 |
| Palestinians dressed up as torture detainees |
·
Interrogation at Israeli secret prisons: at least one of the
detainees Addameer has documented their cases have stated that they were taken
to unknown centers. The detainee said that the interrogators at this center
were all face-covered and wearing a different uniform than the known usual
uniforms. It has been revealed in the past that Israel has secret prisons that
are removed from maps and airbrushed aerial photographs.[3]
Others such
as Samir Arbeed have
been left permanently disabled as a result of their experiences See Israel/
OPT: Legally-sanctioned torture of Palestinian detainee left him in critical
condition
What is
particularly reprehensible is the involvement of Israeli doctors and physicians
in the use of torture. Doctors who monitor prisoners in order that they can
help the torturers decide how far to go, who declare when a prisoner is fit enough
for further torture and who deliberately lie in medical reports in order to
cover for the torturers. Comparisons with American doctors who collaborated
with the CIA in water boarding and SS doctors spring to mind. See the article below How
Israeli doctors enable the Shin Bet’s torture industry.
And far from the Israeli Medical Association opposing this they give
the green light for such doctors to continue what they are doing. See for
example the article
by John Yudkin, Emeritus Professor at University College, London.
Physicians
for Human Rights-Israel has stated that if the IMA refused to allow
doctors to serve in security units commonly deploying torture the practice
would come to a halt. The medical presence in these units offers moral
legitimation to Israel’s interrogators. See Global
medical watchdog complicit with Israeli abuses.
 |
| Yoram Blachar |
In 2009 more than 700 doctors from
around the world called
for the Israeli President of the World Medical Association, Yoram Blachar, to step
down, calling him “unfit for office” and claiming that he had turned a blind
eye to the “institutionalised involvement
of doctors” in torture in Israel.
In a letter
they said that the appointment of Blachar, who was President of the Israeli
Medical Association as president of the WMA was “a matter of grave concern.” The signatories, who included
professors and doctors from 43 countries, said that the appointment
“makes a mockery of the principles on which the WMA
was founded in 1947, which was a response to egregious abuses by Germany and
Japan in World War Two.”
Other
prominent doctors who
support Israel’s use of torture include Sir
Michael Marmot, former President of the WMA and a Professor at UCL.
Last
November Heba al-Labadi and Abdul Rahman
Mi’ri, two Jordanians who had been savagely tortured, were released from
Administrative Detention (i.e. imprisonment without trial), Heba went on a 40
day hunger strike and this forced the Jordanian government to insist on the
release of its nationals or face a freeze or worse in their diplomatic
relations. The arrest of Labadi Mi’ri, a cancer
survivor, was a major PR
disaster for Israel. See A
lesson for the Palestinian leadership: Real reasons behind Israel’s arrest and
release of Labadi, Mi’ri
Tony
Greenstein
By +972
Magazine October 7, 2019
From approving brutal interrogation techniques to
writing false medical reports, doctors in Israel have taken an active role
in the torture of Palestinian prisoners.
By Ruchama Marton
Illustrative
photo of an Israeli soldier blindfolding a Palestinian prisoner. (Nati
Shohat/Flash90)
If the Shin Bet runs a school for its agents and interrogators, the
curriculum most certainly includes a class on how to tell a lie. The texts
taught, it seems, do not change with the years. In 1993, responding to
accusations that the Shin Bet brutally tortured Palestinian detainee Hassan
Zubeidi, then Commander of the IDF Northern Command Yossi Peled told Israeli
journalist Gabi Nitzan that “there is no torture in Israel. I served for 30
years in the IDF and I know what I am talking about.”
Twenty-six years later, Deputy Chief of the Shin Bet and former Shin Bet
interrogator, Yitzhak Ilan repeated the same line to news presenter Ya’akov
Eilon on national television while speaking about Samer Arbeed, a 44-year-old
Palestinian who was hospitalized in critical condition after he had been
reportedly tortured by the Shin Bet. Arbeed is suspected of organizing a deadly
bombing that killed a teenage Israeli girl and wounded her father and brother
at a spring in the West Bank in August. Ilan bristled at the notion that the
Shin Bet was somehow responsible for Arbeed’s condition.
Putting aside these absurd forms of denial, as a doctor and founder of
Physicians for Human Rights – Israel, I have always been troubled by how
Israeli doctors cooperate with and enable Israel’s torture industry.
In June 1993, I organized an international conference in Tel Aviv on
behalf of PHR against torture in Israel. At the conference, I presented a Shin
Bet medical document that had been discovered by chance by Israeli journalist
Michal Sela. In the document, the Shin Bet doctor was asked whether the
prisoner in question had any medical restrictions when it came to keeping them
in isolation, whether they could be tied, whether their face could be covered,
or whether they could be made to stand for prolonged periods of time.
The Shin Bet denied such a document ever existed. “There is no document.
It was simply an experimental paper that is not in use,” the agency claimed.
Four years later, a second document, suspiciously similar to the first, came to
light. That document asked doctors to sign off on torture in accordance with
several previously agreed-upon clauses.
The first document, along with other findings, were published in the
book titled “Torture: Human Rights, Medical Ethics and the Case of Israel.” The
book cannot be found in Israel; Steimatzky, Israel’s oldest and largest
bookstore chain, has banned its sale. Perhaps this is further proof that there
is no torture in Israel.
After the document was uncovered, PHR turned to the Israel Medical
Association and asked it to join the struggle against torture. The IMA
requested that PHR hand over the names of the Shin Bet doctors who signed off
on the document so that they could be dealt with internally.
I refused to hand over the names and told the IMA attorney that I was
not interested in going after rank-and-file doctors — I wanted to change the
entire system. That meant doing away with legitimacy granted to confessions
exacted under torture, educating IMA members about non-cooperation with
torturers, and particularly providing active help to those doctors who do
report on suspicion of torture or brutal interrogations.
Back then, the IMA was satisfied with putting our
statements while doing nothing to prevent the Shin Bet’s doctors from
cooperating with torture. Furthermore, the organization failed to fulfill its
obligation to establish a forum for doctors to report on suspected torture.
An ethical, moral, and practical failure
But it is not only doctors in the Shin Bet and the Israel Prison Service
that collaborate with torture. Doctors in emergency rooms across Israel write
false medical opinions in accordance with the demands of the Shin Bet. Take,
for example, the case of Nader Qumsieh from the West Bank city of Beit Sahour.
He was arrested in his home on May 4, 1993 and was brought to Soroka Medical
Center in Be’er Sheva five days later. There a urologist diagnosed
him a hemorrhage and a torn scrotum.
Qumsieh testified that he was beaten during his interrogation and kicked
in his testicles.
Ten days later, Qumsieh was brought before the same urologist for a
medical examination, after the latter had received a phone call from the
Israeli military. The urologist wrote a retroactive letter (as if it had been
written two days earlier), without actually conducting an additional
examination of the patient, in which he said that “according to the patient, he
fell down the stairs two days before he arrived in the emergency room.” This
time, the diagnosis was “superficial hematoma in the scrotal area, which
corresponds to local bruises sustained between two and five days prior to the
examination.” The urologist’s original letter, written after the first
examination, disappeared from Qumsieh’s medical file.
History teaches us that doctors everywhere easily and effectively
internalize the regime’s values, and many of them become loyal servants of the
regime. That was the case in Nazi Germany, in the United States, and in various
countries in Latin America. The same goes for Israel. Qumsieh’s case, along
with countless others, reflects the ethical, moral, and practical failure of
the medical establishment in Israel vis-Ã -vis torture.
Already back in the 18th century, jurists — rather than doctors —
published legal opinions accompanied by proof that there is no connection
between causing pain and getting to the truth. Thus, both torture and
confessions exacted through pain were legally disqualified. One can only assume
that the heads of the Shin Bet, the army, and the police know this bit of
history.
And yet, torture — which includes both mental and physical cruelty — continues
to take place on a large scale. Why? Because the real goal of torture and
humiliation is to break the spirit and body of the prisoner. To eliminate his
or her personality.
The legal understanding for forbidding torture is based on the
utilitarian idea that one cannot arrive at the truth through inflicting pain .
But doctors are committed — first and foremost — to the idea that anything that
causes physical or mental harm to a patient is prohibited.
The Shin Bet medical eligibility document allows for sleep prevention,
it allows interrogators to expose prisoners to extreme temperatures, to beat
them, to tie them for long hours in painful positions, to force them to stand
for hours until the vessels in their feet burst, to cover their heads for prolonged
periods of time, to sexually humiliate them, to break their spirits by severing
their ties to family and lawyers, to keep them in isolation until they lose
their sanity.
The Shin Bet’s medical eligibility form is not the same as the one used
to check eligibility to join the air force or even to drive a car. This kind of
“eligibility” leads the prisoner directly into the torture chamber — and the
doctor knows this. The doctor knows to what kind of systematic process of pain
and humiliation he or she is lending their consent and approval. It is doctors
who oversee the torture, examine the tortured prisoner, and write the medical
opinion or the pathology report.
The white robe passes through the torture chamber like a lurking shadow
during interrogations. A doctor who cooperates with Israel’s torture industry
is complicit in that very industry. If a prisoner dies during interrogation,
the doctor is an accomplice to his or her murder. Doctors, nurses, medics, and
judges who know what is taking place and prefer to remain silent are all
accomplices.
We must unconditionally oppose all forms of torture — without
exceptions. We, citizens of a democratic state, must refuse to cooperate with
the crime of torture, and all the more so when it comes to doctors.
We must also not hide behind the idea that torture is a symptom of the
occupation while telling ourselves that the practice will disappear when the occupation
ends. Torture is a worldview according to which human rights have no place or
value. It existed well before the occupation and it will continue to exist if
we do not change that worldview.
Violent and cruel investigative practices do not benefit national
security even if they are committed on its behalf. Torture causes a spiraling
destruction of our very social fabric. Not only do those who carry out this
terrible kind of “work” lose the values of morality, human dignity, and
democracy, but also all those who remain silent, unwilling to know. In fact,
all of us.
Dr. Ruchama
Marton is the founder of Physicians for Human Rights – Israel. This article was
first published in Hebrew on Local Call. Read it here.
Israel/
OPT: Legally-sanctioned torture of Palestinian detainee left him in critical
condition
30 September
2019, 16:58 UTC
Updated:
30 October 2019, 12:07 UTC
The legally-sanctioned torture of a Palestinian
detainee during interrogation by officers from Shin Bet, Israel’s Security
Agency, further exposes the complicity of Israel’s authorities, including its
judiciary, in the systematic violation of the human right to be free from
torture, said Amnesty International today.
Samir Arbeed was arrested on 25 September on suspicion
of being involved in the killing of a 17-year-old Israeli girl Rina Shnerb.
According to Israeli media reports and Samir’s lawyer,
a “judicial body” granted Shin Bet special permission to “use exceptional ways
to investigate” in his case, effectively sanctioning the use of methods
amounting to torture during his interrogation.
“It
is utterly outrageous that the use of torture during interrogations continues
to be sanctioned by the Israeli authorities, from the Shin Bet, through the
executive branch and all the way to the Supreme Court,”
said Saleh Higazi, Amnesty International’s Deputy
Middle East and North Africa Director.
“Under
international treaties, which legally bind Israel, the use of torture cannot be
justified under any circumstances. This case exposes Israel’s claims that its
judiciary upholds human rights as a complete sham.”
The use of
torture cannot be justified under any circumstances. This case exposes Israel’s
claims that its judiciary upholds human rights as a complete sham
