Showing posts with label Reut Institute. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Reut Institute. Show all posts

24 March 2026

Will the State of Israel Survive? Does Israel Deserve to Survive?

Are we seeing the beginning of the end of Zionism?


How will Israel Collapse?

One of the most common tropes is that Israel has ‘a right to exist’. It is as if any state has a right to exist. Only people have that right.

What Israel is really saying is something entirely different. Israel is an illegitimate state and therefore it fears those who question its legitimacy. From 2009 onwards the Reut Institute, Israel's ‘premier strategy policy group’, devoted itself to what it called the 'delegitimization' of Israel.

The Reut Institute defined 'delegitimization' as the "convergence of seemingly unrelated movements and associations” that delegitimised the Jewish nature of the Israeli State.

Israel’s founding myth (the Jewish ‘return’) does not stand up to scrutiny. Israel was founded on the dispossession of another people who ironically are the real descendants of the ancient Hebrews.

How the Jews of Judea Became the Arabs of Palestine

However much Israel portrays itself as just another hi tech western state it is a state with a difference. It is a ‘Jewish’ ethno-nationalist state. What does this mean?

Is Israel like for example Britain which is nominally a Christian state? Absolutely not. In 1858 Parliament passed the Jews Relief Act which removed restrictions that prevented Jews entering Parliament. It was the beginning of Jewish Emancipation.

No longer were the rights of British citizens dependent upon their religion. This was a rejection of the medieval model whereby the identity of a state was based around a particular religion and those not of that religion were discriminated against.

This marked the transition from a state which accorded rights depending on one’s religion to a secular state. Except for the fact that no-one Jewish can become the monarch Jews face no disability in the UK.

Israel is not just a state where Judaism is the official state religion. In Israel one’s rights and privileges are related to one’s religion or rather race. In Israel a Jew can be recorded in the Population Registry as being of no religion but is still recorded as being of Jewish nationality. There is no Israeli nationality. There are dozens of other nationalities, none of them entitling anyone to anything.

This was spelt out in the Jewish Nation State Law 2018 which states:

1.B  The State of Israel is the national state of the Jewish people, in which it exercises its natural, cultural, and historic right to self-determination.

1.C    Exercising the right to national self-determination in the State of Israel is unique to the Jewish people.

7.    The state views the development of Jewish settlement as a national value.

Netanyahu described what this meant when he said that

“Israel is not a state of all its citizens... Israel is the nation state of the Jewish people – and only it."

In Israel state land is Jewish state land - that is why half the Arab villages in Israel are 'unrecognised'. They have no right to be on state land and like Umm al Hiran they face demolition - something that never happens to a Jewish settlement

In Israel there are two categories of citizen – Jewish and non-Jewish. From this flows one’s rights and privileges. This is the basis of Israel as a Jewish Supremacist State. Israel is a throwback to medieval times.

For example 93% of Israeli land is controlled or owned by the Jewish National Fund in conjunction with the Israeli Lands Authority. The JNF by its constitution only leases land to Jews not non-Jews. The JNF is not some voluntary charitable organisation. It is a para-state body established by the 1953 JNF Law.

In Adalah v. The Israel Lands Administration the JNF argued that it was entitled to lease land to Jews. 80% of its landholdings, 13% of total land in Israel, was confiscated from the Palestinian refugees who were expelled in 1948.

It is as if 93% of English land were owned by the Christian National Fund and when I sought to rent a flat built on its land I was told that I couldn’t because I wasn’t a Christian.

This is why Israel is so sensitive when anyone questions its legitimacy. Apartheid and discrimination against non-Jews is part of Israel’s constitutional DNA. All else is hasbara (propaganda).

Brian Berletic: Iran War - A Gateway to War with China & Russia

October 7, Expansion & Israel’s Forever Wars

When you are in the middle of great historical events it is difficult to see which direction things are heading in or  what is happening with any great clarity. This is especially true of Israel today, with the current war with Iran.

It is not helped by having an imbecile as the US President. Trump’s inability to outline his goals reflects not just his own inadequacies but US imperialism’s arrogance of power, its ‘manifest destiny’ and the belief that might is right. It is not helped by the fact that each statement of Trump contradicts his previous utterances.

Trump is not unique. He reflects the dilemmas of the United States as its ambitions to remake the world fall foul of reality and its waning influence.

However we should not believe that but for Trump all would have been well. Trump reflects a political consensus that ‘something must be done’ about Iran. The question is what. Why? Because Iran’s insistence on being politically independent falls foul of US plans. It also obstructs Israel’s desire for political hegemony in the region.

It is also worth emphasising the point that Marx made in The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte, that people make history, but not of their own time or choosing.

This is particularly true of Hamas. When it launched the uprising on October 7, little did it realise that it would have the consequences that we are seeing today, both inside and outside Gaza. The whole world order and the US’s role as the world’s hegemon is being challenged and thrown into doubt.

NATO countries are reluctant to join in with Netanyahu and Trump’s attack on Iran. Even as servile a creature as Starmer has had his doubts about the Mafioso boss who doubles as President of the US and his zombie assistants although he has since fallen into line.

There are those who see the war against Iran in terms of Netanyahu having dragged Trump into it. This is a fundamental misconception. If Trump hadn’t wanted to go to war he wouldn’t have. Rather I see the situation as analogous to the Suez War where Israel’s attack on Egypt was the pretext for Britain and France’s invasion of Egypt.

When Hamas planned the break-out on October 7 it clearly misjudged Israel’s reaction. It didn’t aim to bring down the Zionist entity. Rather it wanted to capture Israeli hostages in order to exchange them for Palestinian captives.

What it failed to understand was the profound political changes taking place in Israel itself. In particular the rise of the Messianic Religious Nationalist Right led by Bezalel Smotrich and Itamar ben Gvir. These are Jewish Nazis. Even Moshe Yalon, the former Likud Defence Minister said so.

From 1948 to 1967 Israel consolidated what it had seized when it was established. Although it wanted to expand (for example the Suez War) it had to give back its ill-gotten gains. Israelis look back at this period as one when Israel was relatively ‘normal’ despite Israeli Palestinians living under military rule until 1966.

In the 1950s Israel was still too weak to expand and it lacked the settlers. That didn’t stop Israeli leaders entertaining many ideas of how to expand and destabilise their neighbours.

Livia Rokach published a book Israel’s Sacred Terrorism’ based on the Diaries of Moshe Sharrett Israel’s second Prime Minister. It described how on February 25, 1954, Syrian troops stationed in Aleppo revolted against Adib Shishakly's regime.

After lunch Lavon [Defence Minister] took me aside and started trying to persuade me: This is the right moment to act this is the time to move forward and occupy the Syrian border positions beyond the Demilitarized Zone. Syria is disintegrating. A State with whom we signed an armistice agreement exists no more. Its government is about to fall... This is an historical opportunity, we shouldn't miss it.

I was reluctant to approve such a blitz-plan and saw ourselves on the verge of an abyss of disastrous adventure. I asked if he suggests to act immediately and I was shocked when I realized that he does. ... He repeated that time was precious and we must act so as not to miss an opportunity which otherwise might be lost forever. Again I answered that under the circumstances right now I cannot approve any such action.... (25 February 1954, 374)

The next day the Shishakly regime actually fell. The following day, February 27, Sharett was present at a meeting where Lavon and Dayan reported to Ben Gurion that what happened in Syria was - "a typical Iraqi action." The two proposed again that the Israeli army be put on the march. Ben Gurion, "electrified," agreed. Sharett reiterated his opposition, pointing to the certainty of a Security Council condemnation, the possibility of the use against Israel of the Tripartite Declaration of 1950, hence the probability of a "shameful failure" The three objected that "our entrance [into Syria] is justified in view of the situation in Syria. This is an act of defense of our border area." Sharett closed the discussion ...

Lavon's face wore a depressed expression. He understood this to be the end of the matter. (27 February 1954, 377)

On Sunday, February 28, the press reported that no Iraqi troops had entered Syria. The situation in Damascus was under the complete control of President Hashem Al Atassi. The cabinet approved Sharett's position and rejected Lavon's vehement appeal not to miss a historical opportunity. ...

On December 12, 1954, however, a Syrian civilian plane was hijacked by Israeli war planes shortly after its takeoff, and forced to land at Lydda airport. Passengers and crew were detained and interrogated for two days, until stormy international protests

It must be clear to you that we had no justification whatsoever to seize the plane,... I have no reason to doubt the truth of the factual affirmation of the U.S. State Department that our action was without precedent in the history of international practice. ..... What shocks and worries me is the narrow-mindedness and the shortsightedness of our military leaders. They seem to presume that the State of Israel may or even must-behave in the realm of international relations according to the laws of the jungle. (22 December 1954)

All the madcap schemes that Sharrett prevented in the 50s have come to pass today.

Israel's Two Jewish Neo-Nazi Ministers - Ben Gvir & Smotrich

In 1967, the Labour government of Levi Eshkol launched a war against Syria, Jordan and Egypt. The genie was out of the bottle. The conquering of the West Bank and Gaza gave rise to a messianic settler movement. Many on the ‘left’ of the Zionist movement – Yitzhak Tabenkin, Yisrael Galili and Yigal Allon – were to the fore of the settler Greater Israel Movement.

Settlement in the West Bank started with very few settlers at first but by 2021 they had grown to 720,000 when Ben Gvir of the Jewish Nazi Otzma Yehudit was elected to the Knesset.

The break-out on 7 October 2023 took place less than a year after the 2022 elections which brought Ben Gvir and Smotrich into the Israeli government. They took full advantage of October 7 to destroy Gaza, with a view to colonising it and also launched an open reign of terror in the West Bank.

Their viewpoint was summed up on October 9 by Yoav Gallant who described the Palestinians of Gaza as ‘human animals’. The very same phrase used by Heinrich Himmler about non-Aryans in his address to senior SS Generals:

I have ordered a complete siege on the Gaza Strip. There will be no electricity, no food, no fuel, everything is closed. We are fighting human animals and we act accordingly.”

Israel's Protests Against the Judicial Reforms

Throughout 2023 there had been massive protests in Israel against the judicial reforms with sections of the military, in particular the airforce, saying they would refuse to serve.

It must have seemed to those planning October 7 that the contradictions within Zionism were leading to a fundamental breakdown in Israeli society. What they did not understand was that the whole basis of the Judicial Protests was they had been launched on the basis of protecting Israeli Jewish democracy whilst ignoring the occupation of Gaza and the West Bank.

Although Israeli activists made efforts to inject those issues into the protests the campaign allowed only token representation for Israeli Palestinians and anti-Occupation groups.

As Yiftach Golov, spokesperson for Brothers and Sisters in Arms said: “(while) it’s important to one day solve the [Israeli-Palestinian] conflict, this is not an immediate threat” to Israeli democracy.’

Moshe Yaalon, ex-Likud Defence Minister describes Smotrich & Ben Gvir as 'Mein Kampf reversed'

Hamas failed to understand that the protests against the judicial reforms, a product of the ascendancy of the messianic fascists, took place within Israeli Jewish society and on the basis of an acceptance of the position of the Palestinians.

When October 7 happened, the protests folded as Israeli Jewish society came together. The Israeli state was now prepared to embark once more on a program of expansion with the full support of all wings of Zionism.

During the course of the Genocide in Gaza, Israel occupied both Lebanon and Syria. The ‘left’ Zionists, in so far as they existed, fully accepted all Netanyahu’s wars. Yet when Iranian missiles hit Israeli civilian areas, Israelis - without a hint of irony - complained bitterly at these 'war crimes' - having done their best to discredit the International Criminal Court and all international law.

How will Israel Collapse

In the video How will Israel Collapse? five factors are listed that will lead to Israel’s collapse. They are:

1.           The weakening of United States Support

2.           The weakening of support from American Jews

3.           The breakdown in Social Cohesion

4.           The Fight for Survival

5.           The Economy

Although all of these are important, the most important is the first factor, US support. Today we are seeing a fracturing of the political alliance in support of Israel with sections of the Democrats splitting off coupled with a division in the MAGA base. In particular there has been a sea change in American political opinion such that a majority of the population now sympathise more with the Palestinians than the Israelis. This is true of the West as a whole.

However we haven’t seen any significant diminution in the support of corporate America and establishment opinion, not least the military-industrial base in support of Israel.

It is important that public opinion is now moving against Israel and no longer buys into the idea that Israel is the ‘only democracy in the Middle East’. However we should not forget that US foreign policy has never depended on public support.

It will take a concerted campaign from below to force US corporations to disinvest and withdraw support from Israeli apartheid. What may happen is that the US will reduce its support for Israel and refuse to automatically support every Israeli adventure that Netanyahu or his successors propose.

The aftermath of an Iranian missile strike

What the video doesn't mention, but which the Iran war is demonstrating,  is the elephant in the room - the corrupt and authoritarian Arab regimes. Their overthrow are key to the US dropping its support for the Zionist state. They are Israel's junior allies. What is missing is the Arab masses themselves who have tolerated or acquiesced in the maintenance of these regimes.

The weakening of support from American Jews, although welcome, is not a decisive factor for the simple reason that contrary to the propaganda of the imperialist politicians and the anti-Semitic Right, US support has never depended on Jewish support for Israel. Jews provided the moral alibi and political shield for that support. They have never been the reason for that support.

Israel is a settler colonial state that is bound together by its antagonism to the Palestinians. War and expansion are part of the Zionist DNA. Without the Palestinians and external enemies Israel may already have been engulfed in a civil war.

Israel's War for Survival Means Endless Wars and the Dehumanisation of Non-Jews

That is why Israel will never be a ‘normal’ capitalist state. It sees itself as the bulwark of the West in a hostile region. As Joe Biden said, if Israel did not exist it would have to be invented. Israel will never be content with its existing borders. Israel is the only state in the world not to define its borders.

However we should not fool ourselves that Israel will be destroyed or collapse from within. Rather there will be an incremental erosion of democratic rights even for Jews. It will be increasingly intolerant even for Jews.

The days of a steady stream of immigrants from the Jewish diaspora via Aliyah are over. The direction of migration is out of the country not into it.

As Israel moves further to the neo-Nazi right and increasingly theocratic under the influence of halachic rather than civil law, coupled with the never ending wars, so we can expect an increasing number of Jews to emigrate. Emigration today is at a record high. Israel will more and more come to resemble a theocracy with religious nationalists in the driving seat.

The Zionist organisations invested heavily in capturing diaspora Jewish organisations like the Board of Deputies. Increasingly, despite the weaponisation of anti-Semitism, they will have greater difficulty in controlling Jewish opposition to the Israeli state, not least amongst the young. Already today it is clear that the Board is to the right of most Jews in Britain.

As we see in the war against Iran, the further Israel extends itself the weaker it will become. Expansion has its downside and those Zionists who dream of a Jewish Empire should remember the fate of all empires.

Western politicians will continue to pretend that Israel is a democracy. In so doing they ignore the genocide in Gaza, the apartheid and settler terror on the West Bank and the open racism such as the ‘Death to Arabs’ marches. To say nothing of the racism and apartheid within 1948 Israel.

We saw after October 7 how those who considered themselves part of the Zionist ‘left’ accepted the narrative of the Israeli Right. Over 60% of Israeli Jews support the extermination of the Palestinians of Gaza and 56% support the expulsion of Israel’s Palestinians.

The Israeli Jewish working class will play little or no part in opposing these things. In a settler colonial state the working class sacrifices its class interests for what it sees as its national interests. The Israeli working class has never broken from Zionism.  Mechanical and economistic Marxists who reduce everything to a sociological definition of class will continue to be baffled as to why their predictions of working class unity with the Palestinians never come to pass.

The Israeli working class has never been able to create its own independent political organisations. Its ‘trade union’ Histadrut was at one and the same time the largest employer after the state itself. It was a colonising agency not a trade union except in the narrowest sense. Zionism is an alliance between the settler working class and the settler capitalists.

The Israeli working class, like the White South Africa working class, is on the right of Israeli politics. If South Africa is any guide, the first sections of the Israeli population that will be prepared to abandon Zionism will be its capitalists and middle class not the Israeli working class.

Israel sees itself as in an existential battle for survival as in the slogan of Israel’s ‘right to self defence’. ‘Self defence’ means Israel’s right to attack anyone who challenges its hegemony.

It is an essential component of Israeli settler identity that it is always the victim, even when it’s the aggressor. This is true of all settler colonialism. It was the ‘left’ Zionists of Mapam (long since disappeared) who talked of ‘shooting and crying’. Today the Zionists don’t cry when they kill – that is the main difference between ‘left’ and ‘right’ Zionism.

This self pity is a characteristic of colonialism in general. The British Empire according to Rudyard Kipling’s poem had to:

Take up the White Man's burden—

And reap his old reward,

The blame of those ye better,

The hate of those ye guard

Israel’s economy is bound up with Israel’s role as a projection of US power. Whatever the strain of war on Israel’s economy it will survive as long as it is bailed out by the United States.

Also missing from How will Israel Collapse is any mention of the solidarity campaign outside of Israel, BDS or Arab and Palestinian agency. It presupposes that Israel will just collapse.

What will Happen to the Settler State?

The Palestine solidarity movement rarely discusses what will happen to the settlers if there is a solution. There are approximately 7 million Israeli Jews. This question is vital to the de-Zionisation and decolonisation of Israel. It may be crucial to achieving a settlement along the lines of apartheid in South Africa.

It is naive to suppose that all Israel’s Jews will emigrate to Europe or the USA. For many Israeli Jews there will be nowhere to go. As Israel becomes increasingly a theocratic police state under the Ben Gvirs and Smotrichs, social tensions will be exacerbated within the settler community. The question how to take advantage of these tensions and divisions is crucial.

Between early 2022 and mid-2024, more than 125,000 Jewish citizens left Israel than entered. The trend is believed to have continued through 2025. The current war with Iran is almost certain to ensure that emigration increases.

Knesset Immigration Committee chair MK Gilad Kariv warned that

this is no longer a trend — it’s a tsunami. Many Israelis are choosing to build their future outside the State of Israel, and fewer and fewer are returning.”

If this emigration continues Europe and the USA may raise their immigration barriers and prevent Israeli Jews coming.

Israel has now become a state of permanent war. If Iran is defeated then it will look for a new enemy such as Turkey. Israel cannot survive without an external enemy.

It is essential that any movement for decolonisation holds out the promise that Israeli Jews who wish to live in peace and equality will be able to do so. That is why the old PLO call for a Democratic, Secular State is more relevant now than ever. Those who call for the expulsion of all the Jews in Israel are holding up a mirror to the Ben Gvirs and Smotrichs.

Israel is an artificial state that is not destined for a permanent place in the sun. With the rise of the messianic settler right it is going to be increasingly uncomfortable for secular Israelis.

The aftermath of an Iranian missile strike in Arad

Israel’s existence is a temporary one. I doubt that it is even going to last for the first 100 years. There is no going back from the forever wars as Israel expands into Lebanon, Syria soon to be followed by Jordan and possibly Egypt.

It is important that anti-Zionists abroad enters into a close relationship with that section of the Israeli Jewish population, however small, that is prepared to reject either Zionism, Jewish Supremacy or apartheid. It is possible that a small section of Israeli Jewish workers will realise that their class interests and Zionism do not coincide.

My fear is that Israel, like South Africa before the end of apartheid, is going to have a very bloody end before Zionism is finally ended. Many people both in Palestine and the wider Middle East region, are going to have to pay a very heavy price for its demise.

Tony Greenstein

4 October 2023

Why You Can’t Be a Genuine Supporter of the Palestinians Unless You Are Anti-Zionist

 Just as Supporters of Black Liberation in South Africa Opposed Apartheid, Supporters of the Palestinians Must Oppose Zionism and Israel as a ‘Jewish’ State


This is the logic of Zionism – if you believe in universal values then you are no better than the Jews who perished in the gas chamber – indeed it is a pity that you weren’t among them

I have written many hundreds of articles, thousands if you count my blogs, but my article in today’s Electronic Intifada Only anti-Zionists are real supporters of Palestine is one of the most important, I have written.

I have long grappled with the question as to why it was that those who purported to support the Palestinians in the Labour Party, gave their support to an ‘anti-Semitism’ smear campaign, whose sole purpose was to remove Jeremy Corbyn as leader because of his support for the Palestinians.

On 11 April 2016, I wrote to Ben Soffa, Secretary of Palestine Solidarity Campaign about the Zionists’ ‘anti-Semitism’ smear campaign. Rereading it today it seems prescient.

Despite initiatives from a number of Jewish groups… to stem the [anti-Semitism] attacks from the Board of Deputies, the BBC and the Guardian in particular, there has been complete silence from PSC. PSC prides itself on being the largest solidarity organisation in Britain. The Executive boasted in its Annual Report that it had contacted 1,042 candidates at the General Election, yet it hasn’t seen fit to contact any Labour parliamentarians to speak up against the attacks of the Zionists and the Labour Right… 

Why haven’t you for example organised a large public meeting on the issue with say Ken Livingstone and a sympathetic MP as speakers or issued press releases, produced leaflets, called press conferences, pressed for articles in the Opinion columns of the quality press etc?  I know that PSC is renowned for its caution and timidity but there must be some limits to this….

PSC has resources that other groups do not…. It is inexcusable that it has done absolutely nothing to respond to the Zionists daily attacks. …

… Part of the problem is undoubtedly the political weakness of PSC, which supports the Palestinians whilst not opposing Zionism. Historically PSC has prefered to act as a campaigning group around human rights whilst avoiding thorny issues such as Zionism and anti-Semitism. 

The ceaseless political attack by the Zionists on support for the Palestinians in the LP cannot simply be ignored.  They will not go away because their campaign is linked with the determination of the Right in the LP to remove Corbyn.  ‘Anti-Semitism’ is their weapon of choice….

Until Jeremy Corbyn firmly rebuts his critics he will continue to come under attack.  Appeasement rarely works.  It is no use Corbyn saying that he opposes anti-Semitism because what he means by anti-Semitism and the Zionists mean by it are two different things.… Until Corbyn speaks out saying that yes he opposes anti-Semitism but yes he supports the Palestinians, including the Boycott of Israel, giving chapter and verse on why Israel is a racist and apartheid state, then the attacks will continue.

Ben Soffa’s response oozed complacency. He began his letter to me of 20 April 2016 by quoting the 2010 Report of the Reut Institute.

A central objective is to change this situation by forcing them [Palestine solidarity organisations] to 'play defense'.

This means systematically exposing information about delegitimizers, their activities, and the organizations that they operate out of. The goal is to eventually frame them, depending on their agendas, as anti-peace, anti-Semitic, dishonest purveyors of double standards.

Despite saying that ‘It is clear that the upsurge in attempts to link support for the rights of the Palestinian people with anti-Semitism requires a new a concerted response.’ Soffa went on to say that

… I make no apology for the fact that we do not engage in every debate some would wish to involve us in. As the Reut Institute set out, there is a plan to force us to 'play defence' on the terrain chosen by those wishing to preserve the status quo in Palestine. We must not fall into the trap of allowing our opponents to set our agenda, which is precisely why PSC chooses to make the intervention we feel are most helpful to the situation, rather than seeking to make every intervention which might be possible…

There is much work to be done, but it is also not necessarily most effective for PSC to be the organisation leading on all aspects of this.

The problem with not engaging with the ‘anti-Semitism’ smear campaign was that it didn’t then go away. What it did mean was Britain’s largest Palestine solidarity group was absent from the fight against the Zionist lobby and their allies, the Labour Right.

There is good reason to believe that PSC did not want to align itself with the Corbyn left since their strategy involved aligning and working with those bitterly opposed to Corbyn. The problem with this was that the Labour Right, even those like Nisa Nandy who professed to support the Palestinians, would willingly throw the Palestinians under the bus to get rid of Corbyn.

Almost all the trade unions affiliated to Palestine Solidarity Campaign, who proudly use their affiliation as ‘proof’ that they support the Palestinians, were at one and the same time supporting the IHRA ‘definition’ of anti-Semitism and the Jewish Labour Movement. The IHRA’s sole purpose was to label supporters of the Palestinians as anti-Semitic.

Lisa Nandy's Concern for Palestinian Children's Rights Didn't Prevent Her 'Barnstorming' Speech to Labour Friends of Israel - PSC was happy to provide a Platform for these Creatures

In some unions like the GMB, the IHRA has been used to expel genuine supporters of the Palestinians like Bert Schouwenburg.

Even the most stupid trade union leaders, like Gary Smith or Sharon Graham, understand the purpose behind the IHRA. Nearly all of the IHRA’s examples of ‘anti-Semitism’ involved opposition to Israel and Zionism. It completely ignored the genuine anti-Semitism of the far-right, yet PSC took a conscious decision not to raise the IHRA with its trade union affiliates.

Since PSC never asked anything of Nandy, Thornberry et al. they got nothing back except platitudes

When PSC held a trade union conference in 2019 Director Ben Jamal asked me to leave because I had distributed leaflets opposing the IHRA. Why is it that PSC is so reluctant to raise ‘difficult issues’ like the weaponisation of anti-Semitism with trade unions? Why does PSC value affiliations which are politically worthless?

First She was Chair of Labour Friends of Palestine

The conclusions I reached don’t make for easy reading but we have to face up to unpleasant truths. The trade unions, with the support of PSC, were able to proclaim their support for the Palestinians at one and the same time as they supported a Jewish Supremacist state.

and then a regular on PSC Platforms

As Jesus wisely observed you cannot serve two masters, God and Mammon. You have to make a choice between opposition to Israeli settler colonialism and support for the Palestinians or support for Israel as a Jewish State.

and then the JLM's preferred candidate for leader

PSC has chosen to ride two horses which is why it is ineffectual politically. On the one hand it supports the Palestinians and on the other it refuses to challenge the imperialist neo-colonial narrative of support for the two state solution. It doesn’t even challenge the anti-Semitism narrative that says Jews are an oppressed group still less argue that Israel as a ‘Jewish’ state must inevitably be a racist state.

PSC has failed to master the art of riding 2 horses at the same time

The result is that PSC’s narrative is entirely incoherent and all that it can do is point to Israel’s human rights abuses. That of course is fine but how is PSC different from a human rights NGO such as War on Want? In many ways PSC is less effective than WOW.

When it came to supporting Corbyn against the Zionists PSC was conspicuous by its absence. PSC put up no opposition to the Zionists’ anti-Corbyn campaign for fear of upsetting trade union leaders and the Labour Right. PSC abandoned Palestinian supporters inside the Labour Party. They left the field clear to the Zionists.

Anyone claiming to support both Black people in South Africa and Apartheid would have been ridiculed yet today you have large numbers of people who claim to both support the Palestinians and the Israeli state. Quite simply you cannot support the Executioner and the Condemned Man – politics is about making choices not compromises.

No one was too opportunistic or right-wing to go on PSC's platforms

Today supporters of a two state solution are in reality supporters of an Apartheid Solution in Palestine. They are supporting the continuing existence of a state based on ethnic cleansing whilst at the same time supporting their victims. The time has come for genuine supporters of the Palestinians to say to groups like PSC that you have to make a choice. You cannot continue to try and ride two horses.

I resigned from PSC in 2021 when it adopted a Constitution which abandoned opposition to Zionism. PSC did this with the support of the Socialist Workers Party and others who claim to be on the left.

I hope that my article stimulates the discussion that is necessary if we are going to see a strategic change of direction for the Palestine solidarity movement in Britain. PSC’s ‘strategy’ of ‘mainstreaming’ is dead in the water. The British Establishment is wedded to support for Zionism, as it has been for over a century. No amount of rational argument will change the minds of racists like Robert Jenrick.

I am grateful to Electronic Intifada, the most important Palestinian news site there is, for carrying my article.

Tony Greenstein

Only anti-Zionists are real supporters of Palestine

Tony Greenstein The Electronic Intifada 3 October 2023

Britain’s Palestine solidarity movement is at a crossroads. Loredana Sangiuliano ZUMA Press

The statement that you can’t be a supporter of the Palestinians unless you are an anti-Zionist may seem dogmatic, even sectarian to some.

But it is the failure of Britain’s Palestine solidarity movement to understand this simple truth which is responsible for so many of our recent setbacks. It is this which has enabled the successful weaponization of anti-Semitism.

Subjectively speaking, it is perfectly possible to support the Palestinians and the “right of Israel to exist” at the same time. In theory, there was no reason at all why good men and women could not sit down and draw the boundaries of a two-state solution equitable to all.

There was only one problem. Such a solution failed to take into account the dynamics of settler-colonialism and of Zionism in particular.

Many supporters of the British Empire, liberal imperialists such as Thomas MacCaulay and the Labour Party Fabians, really did believe that there could be a benevolent imperialism that was compatible with supporting the rights of the colonized. It was called “trusteeship.”

Moving from PSC to Labour Friends of Israel is effortless for Emily Thornberry because PSC asks so little of its speakers

Many honest people believed that the colonies were the “White Man’s Burden,” as the British novelist and poet Rudyard Kipling infamously put it, and that we were only in India and Africa out of the goodness of our hearts.

The Church Missionary Society and people like John Philip would have been aghast if you had accused them of supporting white supremacy. Yet that is what they did.

Thornberry repays PSC's invitation by attacking BDS to Israeli Embassy Group Labour Friends of Israel

Holding contradictory ideas inside one’s head is what most people do, for much of the time. It’s called “cognitive dissonance” or as George Orwell termed it, “doublethink.”

However, for a solidarity organization to do the same renders its task impossible. Sooner or later a choice has to be made.

Solidarity with the Palestinians, although it involves opposing many egregious abuses of human rights, is not at bottom a question of human rights. Just as apartheid in South Africa was not primarily about human rights but Black liberation from white minority rule, so too is the Palestinian question primarily about liberation from Zionism and a state of Jewish supremacy.

PSC climbdown

In 2022 I resigned, for the second time, from the organization I had helped found, the Palestine Solidarity Campaign, because it had adopted in March of that year a new constitution which eliminated its previous opposition to Zionism. If the truth be told, opposition to Zionism had long been abandoned by PSC. But by removing this from its constitution PSC made explicit what before had been implicit.

Prior to its March 2022 annual general meeting (when the PSC executive railroaded through the changes) the PSC’s old constitution had included an unambiguous clause stating that one of the group’s objectives was “opposition to racism, including … the apartheid and Zionist nature of the Israeli state.”

The new constitution has watered this down significantly, stating only that Israel’s system of apartheid and settler colonialism is “motivated by Zionism,” without explaining PSC’s position on Zionism. The argument privately used by the PSC to “justify” this change was that Zionism means different things to different people.

Zionism is the racist creed and movement which led to the dispossession and expulsion of the Palestinians.

It was the failure of former Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn and much of the Labour left to combine support for the Palestinians with opposition to Zionism that was their Achilles’ heel. It was no surprise that the Jewish Labour Movement and its faithful poodle Jon Lansman wanted to abolish any mention of Zionism.

Their reasoning was that some people used the term “Zionist” when they really meant “Jew.” But it was the Zionists themselves who had deliberately sought to confuse the distinction in the minds of people.

Their other argument was that “Zionism” covered a multitude of sins – from left to right, obscuring the fact that all wings of Zionism agreed on establishing a Jewish state with a large majority of Jews.

Corbyn was undoubtedly a supporter of the Palestinians but he had no understanding of Zionism and could not therefore explain why or how the Palestinians had become marginalized and oppressed in Israel.

Appeasement

When the “anti-Semitism” campaign first began, Corbyn effectively became a Zionist.

He supported a Palestinian state but also recognized the legitimacy of the Jewish Labour Movement’s claim to represent Jews in the Labour Party. Instead of seeing the JLM as a lobby group, the primary purpose of which was support for the Israeli state and therefore the oppression of the Palestinians, Corbyn accepted that the group’s purported concerns about anti-Semitism were genuine.

There was absolutely no excuse for Corbyn’s pathetic response to the JLM and the Board of Deputies of British Jews (another pro-Israel group which led the “anti-Semitism” campaign against him).

Having spent 30 years as a campaigner for Palestinian rights, Corbyn above all was familiar with the Zionist accusation of “anti-Semitism.” Yet when he became leader he forgot all of this.

Support for the two-state solution enabled Corbyn to both support the Zionists and support the Palestinians. Saying, as he did, that there was a place for both Zionists and anti-Zionists in Labour was in effect saying there was a place for both racists and anti-racists in the party.

Corbyn’s human rights concerns disappeared as he lent his support to the very organization, the JLM, which was formed to remove him.

Those who accept Israel’s “right to exist” accept the legitimacy of Zionism. They fail to understand that a “Jewish” state, as an expansionist ethno-nationalist settler-colonial state, could never accept anything more than a set of mini bantustans.

When Corbyn decided to commission the Chakrabarti inquiry he set the seal on this process. He accepted that there was a problem of anti-Semitism in the Labour Party.

Having appeased the Zionists once, Corbyn went on to appease them repeatedly until he himself became a victim.

The resulting report, authored in 2016 by human rights lawyer Shami Chakrabarti, found no evidence that Labour was dominated by anti-Semitism as was being claimed at the time. Nevertheless, it made some key concessions to this false narrative.

Chakrabarti defined Zionism not as a political creed or movement but as a form of Jewish identity. In so doing she completely failed to understand where the accusations of anti-Semitism were coming from.

She wrote in the report that:

A further complexity comes from left-wing British Jewry, including, but not exclusively, young people becoming increasingly critical of, and disenchanted with, Israeli government policy in relation to settlements in the West Bank and the bombardment of Gaza in particular. This has led to some people personally redefining their Zionism in ways that appear to grant less support to the state of Israel and more solidarity to fellow Jewish people the world over … It seems to me that it is for all people to self-define their political beliefs and I cannot hope to do justice to the rich range of self-descriptions of both Jewishness or Zionism, even within the Labour Party, that I have heard.

Of course, anyone can self-define their political beliefs and what they understand Zionism means. However, there is no obligation on anyone else to accept such an identity.

The only meaning of Zionism that counts is that of those who suffer its ill effects – the Palestinians. People who define themselves as Zionists tell us nothing other than what is going on in their heads.

Confusion as a badge of honor

The ability to combine both support for the Palestinians with support for Zionism enabled political charlatans like the lawmaker Lisa Nandy to chair Labour Friends of Palestine whilst denouncing opposition to Zionism as anti-Semitic.

Just imagine that someone had said that although they supported the rights of Black South Africans they refused to oppose apartheid. They would have been ridiculed, yet that is precisely what is happening when people claim to support the Palestinians yet refuse to identify as anti-Zionists.

This is why I term support for a two-state solution, with its assumption that a racist “Jewish” state could co-exist alongside a Palestinian state, as support for the continued oppression of the Palestinians.

Jeremy Corbyn, with his support of the two-state solution, made his own political confusion over Palestine into a badge of honor. He also disarmed his supporters and gave confidence to his detractors.

By supporting the state of Israel, Corbyn also supported the idea that Israel was the nation state of the Jews.

If this was the case, and if Jews were indeed a nation, despite living in most of the world’s countries, then clearly Jews have the right to self-determination. Ipso facto, one must welcome Israel’s new neo-Nazi police minister, Itamar Ben-Gvir.

Theirs is the monstrosity that is called Israel.

Instead of calling out the Jewish Labour Movement as supporters of a racist, settler-colonial state, Corbyn bought into the idea that Israel was guilty of nothing more than Jewish nationalism and its opponents were guilty of anti-Semitism. The tragedy was that the Palestinians themselves, in the form of the Palestine Liberation Organization, had abandoned their own anti-Zionism in the belief that Zionism could be confined within only part of historic Palestine – what the Zionists term Eretz Yisrael (Hebrew for the land of Israel).

To say you support the Palestinians while refusing to oppose Zionism, the movement with a primary goal not of fighting anti-Semitism but fighting the native Arab Palestinians, is to accept the left-Zionist narrative of a “conflict” between two peoples, a clash of right vs right. It renders any solution, other than a neo-colonial one, impossible and in practice it means surrendering to the existing power structure in Palestine.

Nowhere is this clearer than in Britain’s trade unions.

Nearly all major trade unions are affiliated to the Palestine Solidarity Campaign. All of them claim to support the Palestinians.

Yet Gail Cartmail, the assistant general secretary of Unite – which calls itself Britain’s leading union – justified banning the film Oh Jeremy Corbyn: The Big Lie and a talk by Asa Winstanley covering his new book Weaponising Anti-Semitism (which documents the fake “anti-Semitism” campaign) all on the grounds that Jews have been hurt and even made afraid by journalism that seeks to tell the truth.

The reality is that by adopting Israel’s twisted definition of anti-Semitism, British unions are facing both ways at the same time. They support the Palestinians yet also support the Jewish Labour Movement and those who took down Corbyn.

The trade unions can only get away with this because supporters of the Palestinians in the Labour Party, including Corbyn, fail to understand how anti-Semitism has been weaponized in the service of state and nation.

Tony Greenstein is the author of Zionism During the Holocaust.

See my blog from January 2020

Without an anti-Zionist critique solidarity with the Palestinians is nothing more than charity