Showing posts with label Na’amod. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Na’amod. Show all posts

16 January 2025

Led By the Jewish Bloc We Will Be Marching on Saturday March 18 to the BBC Whatever the Institutionally Racist Metropolitan Police Say

In Their Desire to Protect BBC Bias the Met are Once Again Hiding Behind Jews 


Owen Jones Interviews Ben Jamal about Zionist 'fears' about Marches Against Genocide in Gaza

As we celebrate the ceasefire in Gaza, a ceasefire that despite his claims, Genocide Joe Biden has nothing to do with, we see the Metropolitan Police giving a veto to the Genocidal ‘Chief Rabbi’ Mirvis, a settler-trained rabbi who is an out and out racist, having participated in the ‘Death to the Arabs’ flag marches in Jerusalem.

As Nina Morris-Evans wrote in the Times of Israel in May 2017:

I’m ashamed of activities endorsed by two of the most influential members of the Orthodox movement: Rabbi Lord Jonathan Sacks and Chief Rabbi Ephraim Mirvis. This week they were in Jerusalem to support festivities planned by the organisation Mizrachi Olami.

One of these events is the annual Jerusalem Day March of the Flags on 24 May (yesterday). Thousands of young people from across the country were bussed in to march through the Jewish Old City, shutting down most of the Muslim quarter and surrounding areas.

This march has come to be associated with growing levels of hate speech and racist violence, including shouts of “Death to Arabs” and vandalism to Palestinian property. Today (Thursday), some of the delegates were due to visit Hebron and dance through the streets with IDF soldiers.

Hebron is a city in which 200,000 residents live under the control of 600 soldiers, protecting 850 settlers. This celebration is an unequivocally political act, blatantly supporting the settlers’ presence there.

That the Police base their decision to try and reroute the Palestine  march on the views of this out and out racist says everything about their political partisanship.

It is incredibly important that Saturday’s Palestine demonstration is the largest yet

The Police’s decision to try to ban Saturday’s march against Genocide in Gaza because theproposed route would have caused serious disruption to a central London synagogue’ is a lie. Lying comes as easily to the Met as a duck to water.

Laughably the Met also said ‘our role is not to take sides’. The fact that the Met have raised disruption to a synagogue, that is not even on the route, as a pretext to prevent a demonstration proves that they have taken sides. The side of the supporters  of Genocide in Gaza.


Owen Jones Interview with Ben Jamal on Police Obstruction

Implicit in this decision is the assumption that the march poses a threat to Jews. This has been the long-standing refrain of Israel’s genocide supporters but there isn’t a sliver of evidence for it.

The Met have consistently accepted the racialised narrative that Palestinian demonstrations pose a threat to Jewish  people. Their colonial mindset is incapable of understanding that the Palestinian fight for liberation is not an anti-Jewish one but an anti-Zionist one.

According to this playbook Palestinians reject colonisation and occupation, not because of dispossession and the theft of land and water but because they are anti-Jewish.

A similar narrative operated in Apartheid South Africa. According to apologists for White Supremacy Black people opposed racial discrimination not because they didn’t like being discriminated against but because they were anti-White. So it is with the Jewish Supremacist State of Israel.

The Met have demonstrated this colonial and imperialist mentality repeatedly over the last 15 months. Julia Bard described how, on the 9 December 2023 demonstration:

a cordon of police officers materialised in front of us, separating us from the march. They apparently had the idea that, since we were Jews, we must be counterdemonstrators.

We tried again and again to explain that we were there in support of the Palestinians, and had been present on the entire march....

But they simply couldn’t or wouldn’t compute the idea of Jews supporting Palestinians. This isn’t the first time. We’re getting used to police seeing the word “Jewish” on banners and telling us which side we’re on — and if we don’t agree, trying to stop us from joining the Palestine marches.

A month earlier, at the protest on November 11, the several-hundred-strong Jewish bloc assembled in Belgrave Square before joining the main march as it passed a nearby junction. While we were waiting, two Forward “Intelligence” Team officers — the police in the baby-blue vests — asked to speak to “the organiser” of what they evidently thought was a separate protest....

Since they would not accept that people holding banners with the word “Jewish” on them could support the Palestinians, we spontaneously started chanting “Free free Palestine,” until, eventually, one of the police officers got the point.

A more serious incident occurred on 18th May 2024.

Jewish pro-Palestine protester assaulted when pushed into hostile counter protest by Metropolitan Police Officer

UK – On 18 May 2024, as a result of Police actions, a Jewish activist named Jessica L was assaulted by counter-protesters when she attended the pro-Palestine ‘National March for Ceasefire’ wearing a Kippah and t-shirt with “Jews Say Ceasefire Now”.

Counter-protesters had gathered holding Israel flags. When Jessica passed by this area they became visibly and audibly hostile to her, shouting derogatory, misogynistic, Islamophobic and antisemitic abuse. Jessica was subjected to slurs such as “Kapo” and accusations of being a self-hating Jew—terms uniquely weaponized against Jewish supporters of Palestinian liberation. She also received explicit threats of violence and sexual assault.

A Met Police Liaison Officer identified Jessica as Jewish based on her attire, forcibly removed her from the main protest, and then pushed her towards the counter-protestors as he shouted at her to “get back over there”. The counter-protestors proceeded to reach across the barriers, pulled Jessica towards them by the hair, attempted to remove her kippah, struck her, spat on her, and they continued to shout misogynistic and antisemitic abuse at her.

Jessica shouted for help, but police officers failed to intervene. Eventually, she freed herself with the help of PSC stewards and rejoined the demonstration. A police officer then communicated that they wanted Jessica to leave the demonstration due to the amount of hatred and hostility she was receiving from the counter-protesters. Jessica sought to report the assault to police officers, but she was told to report it online. When she then went to make a report at a station, she was refused an in-person meeting with a supervising officer.

Jessica L – a member of Na’amod and JVL – has instructed Bindmans LLP to pursue breaches of her human rights to freedom of expression, assembly and to enjoy these rights without discrimination. The claim is supported by a letter confirming that she felt humiliated, shaken, and degraded by the police conduct and the assault by counter-protesters, facilitated by the police officer’s discriminatory conduct. The incident forced her to leave the protest early.

The incident highlights the forms of intimidation and discrimination, including verbal and physical abuse, that confront anti / non-Zionist Jews who publicly and privately support justice for Palestinians. Jessica L has requested an apology and a meeting with senior Metropolitan Police officers in order to discuss the experiences of Jewish protesters marching in support of Palestine and to propose changes to policing these demonstrations.

Jessica L commented:

“It was terrifying enough to be within the grasp of counter protesters spouting antisemitic hate speech and threats of violence but when a police officer pushed me into their protest, seemingly because he believed that this was the protest where Jewish people belonged, I immediately feared I was in serious danger of harm as the mob grabbed at me, pulling my hair, spitting on me and hurling vile antisemitic abuse at me. I screamed for help and no police officer intervened – thankfully the protest stewards helped me. It was insult to injury to later be told that the police believed I should leave the demonstration because, essentially, they viewed my Jewishness as a provocation, attracting obvious hostility and hatred from the counter protesters, when their focus should have been on protecting my right to protest in safety from violent, antisemitic and Islamophobic hatred.”

Max Hammer, a spokesperson from Na’amod, said:

“The incident on 18 May stands out for the behaviour of the Metropolitan Police officers on site. By inferring a set of political beliefs from the Jewish activist’s physical appearance, the officers not only displayed a distressing lack of awareness of the political diversity within the UK Jewish community, but also demonstrated their inability to keep non- and anti-Zionist Jews safe from antisemitic abuse directed at them by far-right ultra-Zionists.


The police’s role in this violent assault comes amid … repeated labelling of largely peaceful Palestine solidarity marches as “hate marches”. The incident illustrates a persistent issue in the Police’s failure to recognise or prevent the unique forms of antisemitism and right-wing violence directed against non- and anti-Zionist Jews. Neither the Metropolitan Police nor the CST, a charity which collects antisemitism data used by the police, have a reporting system for incidents of antisemitic abuse by Jews against other Jews. …

Given that the prevailing media narrative surrounding PSC’s marches has been that they are unsafe for Jewish people, it is unsurprising that our presence at the marches is not recognized by the police. We urgently call on the police to improve its understanding of Jewish community dynamics and anti-Semitism…

The fight against antisemitism can only be successful if it combats all forms of antisemitism, including those directed against Jewish people who march in solidarity with the people of Palestine.”

Jeffrey Newman, Rabbi Emeritus, commented:

“Jewish campaigners and groups who have campaigned against the Occupation of the West Bank and the war on Gaza or for recognition of the right of Palestinians to their own State on the West Bank and Gaza are frequently vociferously opposed, sometimes with the use of force, by other Jews.

There is a word for the behaviour of Metropolitan Police officers who refuse to understand or recognise that not all Jews support Genocide in Gaza and that is anti-Semitism.



That is why the MPS has rejected the route that was already agreed, citing spurious concerns about the Central Synagogue.  The Met’s justification is here. The Jewish Bloc therefore issued a second statement on 14.1.25.

What will the Met do? attack the JB in order to protect Jews?

BBC Exec Downplayed Israel ‘Plausible Genocide’ Ruling to Dismayed Colleagues


Stephen Kapos, a holocaust survivor, speaks at Palestine solidarity demonstration


Holocaust Survivors and Descendants Sign Open Letter Opposing Ban on BBC Protest

The Metropolitan police intend to ban the 18 January Palestine march from the area around the BBC headquarters in Portland Place in London. Their excuse is that Jewish attendees at a synagogue that is well away from the march route will suffer ‘disruption’ of their religious worship.

We are writing as Jewish Holocaust survivors, and descendants of survivors, to protest against this clear attempt to dissuade people from opposing the Gaza genocide. Along with thousands of other openly Jewish protesters, we have attended numerous Palestine demos in London and have received nothing but support and warmth from our fellow demonstrators. To suggest that the 18 January march is a threat to Jews, or is in any way antisemitic, is simply a fabrication in order to restrict everyone’s right to protest.

Yours sincerely,

Stephen Kapos (survivor of the Holocaust in Hungary)

Agnes Kory (survivor of the Holocaust in Hungary)

Haim Bresheeth (son of two survivors of Auschwitz)

Mark Etkind (son of a survivor of the Lodz ghetto and Buchenwald)

Aurora Yaakov (daughter of survivor of Dachau & Kaufering camps)

Yosefa Loshitzky (daughter of survivors of the Holocaust in Poland)

Miranda Pinch (daughter of a survivor of the Holocaust in Czechoslovakia)

Ursula Blumenthal (daughter of a survivor of the Holocaust in Germany)

Peter Kapos (son of a Holocaust survivor of the Holocaust in Hungary)

Peter Hall (son of a survivor of the Holocaust in Austria)

Sonja Linden (daughter of a survivor of the Holocaust in Germany)

Chris Romberg (son of a survivor of the Holocaust in Austria)

Beatrice Hoffman (daughter of a survivor of the Holocaust in Germany)

Palestine Solidarity Campaign have also issued a Statement on police barring 18 January march from the BBC which has been signed by 42 Members of Parliament and many others.

We strongly condemn police attempts to stop an agreed march for Palestine from protesting at the BBC on 18 January.

The route for the march was confirmed with the police nearly two months ago and as agreed with them, was publicly announced on 30 November. This route has only been used twice in the last 15 months of demonstrations and not since February 2024. With just over a week to go, the Metropolitan Police is reneging on the agreement and has stated its intention to prevent the protest from going ahead as planned.

The BBC is a major institution – it is a publicly-funded state broadcaster and is rightly accountable to the public. The police should not be misusing public order powers to shield the BBC from democratic scrutiny.

The excuse offered by the police is that the march could cause disruption to a nearby synagogue which is not even on the march route. As the Met Police have acknowledged, there has not been a single incident of any threat to a synagogue attached to any of the marches. Any suggestion that pro-Palestine marches are somehow hostile to Jewish people ignores the fact that Jewish people have been joining the marches in their thousands.

The rights to protest and free speech are precious. It is not acceptable in a democratic society that, in the face of an ongoing genocide in Gaza, people should be barred from protesting at the BBC. We call on the police to drop their objections and allow the protest to go ahead as planned.

Palestine Coalition Organisations 

Adnan Hmidan, Acting Chairman, Palestinian Forum in Britain 

Ben Jamal, Director, Palestine Solidarity Campaign 

Ismail Patel, Chairman, Friends of Al-Aqsa 

Lindsey German, Convenor, Stop the War Coalition 

Raghad Altikriti, Chair, Muslim Association of Britain 

Sophie Bolt, General Secretary, Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament 

Members of Parliament (42)

Abtisam Mohamed MP

Adnan Hussain MP 

Andy McDonald MP 

Apsana Begum MP 

Ayoub Khan MP 

Baroness Christine Blower 

Baroness Jenny Jones 

Baroness Pauline Bryan 

Baroness Rosie Boycott 

Bell Riberio Addy MP 

Brendan O’Hara MP 

Brian Leishman MP 

Carla Denyer MP 

Cathal Mallaghan MP 

Chris Hazzard MP 

Chris Law MP 

Dáire Hughes MP 

Dawn Butler MP 

Diane Abbott MP 

Dr Simon Opher MP

Grahame Morris MP 

Ian Byrne MP 

Imran Hussain MP 

Iqbal Mohamed MP 

Jeremy Corbyn MP 

John Finucane MP 

John McDonnell MP 

Jon Trickett MP 

Kim Johnson MP 

Lord Bryn Davies 

Lord John Hendy 

Lord Prem Sikka 

Nadia Whittome MP 

Órfhlaith Begley MP 

Pat Cullen MP 

Paul Maskey MP 

Richard Burgon MP 

Seamus Logan MP 

Shockat Adam MP 

Siân Berry MP 

Steve Witherden MP 

Zarah Sultana MP 



Trade Union and Civil Society Leaders 

Akiko Hart, Director, Liberty 

Amnesty International UK 

ARTICLE 19

Asad Rehman, Executive Director, War on Want 

Brian Linn, General Secretary, Aegis the Union 

Charlotte Marshall, Director, Sabeel-Kairos UK 

Christians for Palestine UK 

Climate Justice Coalition  

Daniel Garnham, General Secretary, Security Industry Federation (SIF) 

Daniel Kebede, General Secretary, National Education Union (NEU) 

Dave Ward, General Secretary, Communication Workers Union (CWU) 

David Wilson, co-founder, War Child 

Dr Jo Grady, General Secretary, University College Union (UCU) 

Dr Sara Husseini, Director, British Palestinian Committee 

Fran Heathcote, General Secretary, Public and Commercial Services Union (PCS) 

Gawain Little, General Secretary, General Federation of Trade Unions (GFTU) 

Greenpeace UK 

John McGowan, General Secretary, Social Workers Union (SWU) 

Kate Flannery, Secretary, Orgreave Truth and Justice Campaign 

Louise Hazan, Co-Director, Tipping Point UK 

Maryam Eslamdoust, General Secretary, Transport Salaried Staffs’ Association

Matt Wrack, General Secretary, Fire Brigades Union (FBU) 

Mick Lynch, General Secretary, National Union of Rail, Maritime and Transport Workers (RMT) 

Mick Whelan, General Secretary, Associated Society of Locomotive Engineers and Firemen (ASLEF) 

Nick Dearden, Director, Global Justice Now 

Peace & Justice Project 

People & Planet 

Rev Chris Rose, Director, Amos Trust 

Sarah Woolley, General Secretary, Bakers, Food and Allied Workers Union

Steve Gillan, General Secretary, Prison Officers Association (POA) 

Steve North, President, Unison 

Zamir Dreni, General Secretary, App Drivers and Couriers Union (ADCU) 

Zita Holbourne, Joint National Chair, Artists Union England and Chair BARAC UK 

 

Prominent individuals including artists, journalists, academics and lawyers  

Ahdaf Soueif, novelist 

Ahmed Alnaouq, journalist and director of We Are Not Numbers 

Ahmed Shihab-Eldin, journalist 

Alex Lawther, actor and filmmaker 

Alex Nunns, author 

Alexei Sayle, author and comedian 

Andrew Murray, journalist 

Andy de la Tour, actor 

Ben Smoke, journalist 

Bilal Hasna, actor 

Brian Eno, musician 

Brigid Keenan, writer and co-founder of the Palestine Festival of Literature 

Charlotte Church, singer 

Daniel Levy, writer and political analyst 

Francesca Martinez, comedian and writer 

Hamza Yusuf, journalist 

Harriet Walter, actor 

Jasleen Kaur, artist (winner of the Turner Prize 2024) 

Jen Brister, comedian and actor 

Jo Siedlecka, editor, Independent Catholic News 

John Rees, journalist 

Juliet Stevenson, actress 

Kamila Shamsie, novelist 

Katharine Hamnett, fashion designer 

Ken Loach, director 

Khalid Abdalla, actor 

Kim Longinotto, filmmaker 

Kneecap, music band 

Lemn Sissay, author and broadcaster 

Mark Adderley, director 

Mark Rylance, actor 

Mark Seddon, former speechwriter to UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon 

Max Porter, writer 

Maxine Peake, actor and writer 

Mike Lerner, producer 

Myriam François, journalist and filmmaker 

Nadia Sawalha, actor 

Nadim Sawalha, actor 

Nancy Strang, producer and filmmaker 

Omar Robert Hamilton, author 

Owen Jones, journalist 

Paloma Faith, singer-songwriter 

Pam Hogg, fashion designer 

Peter Kennard, Professor Emeritus of Political Art, Royal College of Art 

Rachel Holmes, author 

Rana Begum RA, artist 

Rebecca O’Brien, producer 

Richard Sanders, journalist and TV producer 

Riz Ahmed, actor 

Sarah Agha, actress 

Susan Abulhawa, author 

Taj Ali, journalist 

Tariq Ali, political activist and writer 

The Mary Wallopers, band 

Tony Graham, theatre director 

Tracy Seaward, producer 

Victoria Brittain, journalist and author 

Vijay Prashad, author 

Yanis Varoufakis, economist and politician 

Yusuf Cat Stevens, singer 

Zackie Achmat, filmmaker and activist 

Alex Callinicos, Emeritus Professor, Kings College London 

Alex Gordon, former President, RMT 

Amira Nimerawi, CEO, Health Workers 4 Palestine (HW4P) 

Anas Altikriti, CEO & Founder, The Cordoba Foundation 

Andi Kocsondi, GFTU National Executive 

Andrew Feinstein, political activist 

Barnaby Raine, historian  

Brian Shaw, London and South East Regional Secretary, PCS

Chris Doyle, Director, Caabu 

Clare Short, former Secretary of State for International Development 

Claudia Webbe, former MP 

Daniel Machover, solicitor 

Dr Andrew Myerson, A and E Doctor, London Hospital 

Dr Elina Shaari, Surgeon, London 

Dr Feyzi Ismail, Goldsmiths University of London 

Dr Michelle Staggs Kelsall, Senior Lecturer in International Law, SOAS University of London 

Dr Milly Williamson, Goldsmiths, University of London 

Dr Paul O’Connell, Reader in Law, SOAS University of London 

Dr Tanzil Chowdhury, Associate Professor in Public Law, Queen Mary University of London

Emeritus Professor Bill Bowring FAcSS, Barrister, Field Court Chambers 

Emeritus Professor Mica Nava, University of East London 

Fraser McGuire, Unite the Union Hospitality Sector activist & Arise – a Festival of Left Ideas 

Geoffrey Shears, trade union lawyer 

Gholam Kiabany, Goldsmiths, University of London  

Haldane Society of Socialist Lawyers 

Hugh Lanning, Labour & Palestine 

James Schneider, author and activist 

Jess Barnard, Labour National Executive Committee 

Khaled Dawas, Director of GI Surgery, UCLH 

Leanne Mohamad, political activist  

Linsay Taylor, CEO, Muslim Engagement & Development (MEND) 

Matt Foot, Criminal Defence Lawyer 

Matt Willgress, editor, Labour Outlook 

Max Holloway, Leader of Welwyn Hatfield Borough Council 

Michael Mansfield KC, barrister and head of chambers at Nexus Chambers 

Mohammed Kozbar, Deputy Secretary General, Muslim Council of Britain  

Muhammad Uddin, Newham Muslim Forum 

Naomi Wimborne-Idrissi, Jewish Voice for Labour 

Nimer Sultany, Reader in Public Law, SOAS University of London 

Omar Abdel-Mannan, President/Chair, Health Workers 4 Palestine (HW4P)  

Paul Heron, Legal Director, Public Interest Law Centre 

Professor Adam Hanieh, University of Exeter 

Professor Alpa Shah, University of Oxford  

Professor Catherine Rottenberg 

Professor Des Freedman, Goldsmiths, University of London 

Professor John Sloboda, PalAcademic Campaign 

Professor Jonathan Rosenhead 

Professor Justin Schlosberg, University of Westminster 

Professor Laleh Khalili, University of Exeter   

Professor Natalie Fenton, Goldsmiths, London University 

Professor Neve Gordon 

Professor (Emeritus) Phil Taylor 

Rachel Waller, solicitor and former Chair and Trustee of Lawyers for Palestinian Human Rights (LPHR) 

Swee Ang, co-founder and honorary patron, Medical Aid for Palestinians 

Todd Wolfson, President, American Association of University Professors 

Zack Polanski, Deputy Leader of the Green Party of England and Wales and London Assembly Member 

Zoë Garbett, Green Party London Assembly Member 

 See also BBC Exec Downplayed Israel ‘Plausible Genocide’ Ruling to Dismayed Colleagues

20 November 2023

Emergency Appeal – Jewish Chronicle is Facing A Financial Crisis - Please Dig Deep for the Sake of Genocide Jake’s Salary

 Revisiting the case of Emily Honchowicz, the young American Jew blinded in one eye by Israeli Police Thugs

Emily Honcowich - Democracy Now

It’s not every day that the CEO of the Jewish Chronicle, Jo Bucci, writes to me begging for a handout. Jo informed me that:

In the weeks since the war broke out in Israel, our journalists have been working non-stop to bring you the latest news from the front lines as well as closer to home.

Our coverage, which has been read by millions since October 7, has shone a light on the conflict and given our readers stories that matter to them in these difficult times.

I'm writing to you today to ask if you'd consider being a donor to the Jewish Chronicle.

The Jewish Chronicle is the world’s oldest Jewish newspaper, founded in 1841. It has always been the paper of the Jewish Establishment.

Now you will understand dear reader that I am in a dilemma when it comes to giving to good causes. Should I donate my hard earned cash to those ‘anti-Semites’ at Medical Aid for the Palestinians, who will only spend my cash on things like bandages and medicines for Palestinian children in Gaza or should I hand it over to the Jewish Chronicle in order that it can continue to shamelessly lie in the cause of Jewish Supremacy?

Well of course I would like to give a helping hand to the non-Jewish racist who currently edits the JC, one Jake Wallis-Simons but needs must. It’s not that I don’t understand Jo Bucci’s plight. I really do.

Bernard Joseph, unlike 'liar' Lee Harpin and Marcus Dysch, was able to write a fair and balanced article

According to Wikipedia from a high of 55,000 in 1941, former editor Stephen Pollard managed to reduce this from 30,000 when he was appointed in 2009 to 20,141 in 2018 and over a third of those were free copies.

But in August 2010 things were so different. Pollard, who should be called the gravedigger of the JC, was telling readers

I am thrilled to be able to report that the JC's year-on-year ABC circulation figures (30/6/09-30/6/10) are up 3.67%. In June 2009, circulation was 30,436; this June it reached 31,556 – an increase of 1,120.

In other words the obsessive, dishonest anti-Corbyn campaign of Pollard between 2015 and 2019 turned off one-third of its readers.

But if you thought that things couldn’t get worse you are wrong. According to ABC, the auditor for the media industry, circulation has fallen to 12,420 in May-June 2023 and of those nearly half are given away. In other words just 6,371 people are prepared to fork out to buy a copy of the rag.

When Oswald Moseley's British Union of Fascists tried to march through London's East End the JC, the Board of Deputies and the Zionists urged Jews to keep indoors. Jewish and non-Jewish workers ignored the Jewish Establishment and taught Moseley a lesson he would remember

Clearly the JC is in big trouble and its not difficult to understand why. It’s boring, unreadable and a propaganda rag that is at odds with youth culture and political awareness amongst the young. Zionism is irrelevant to all but a handful of zealots. Most Jewish kids know that things are wrong in Israel but according to the JC it is as if the election of neo-Nazis like Ben Gvir and Smotrich  to Israel’s government never happened.

The JC was an early adherent of the Zionist movement or rather they bought it out but in the early days it could be very critical of Zionism. During the Hitler period when the Zionists were looking to take advantage of the Nazi state in order to build their Jewish state, the JC was very critical of the policies of the Zionist movement, and in particular of Ha'avara, the trading agreement between the Nazis and the Zionist movement. Today it is an anti-Palestinian propaganda rag.

In an editorial of 27 December 1935 the JC railed against Ha'avara. It accused the World Zionist Organisation of

aiding and comforting one of the most savage oppressions even in Jewish history. It dishonours and defiles us. It shame us in our own eyes and un-mans us. It is a blow to our pride and a shock to our morale and self-respect at a time when we are most direly in need of the strengthening of these qualities. It also disheartens us, for it breaks the united Jewish boycott front, a front, let it not be forgotten, with which Gentile sympathisers are also aligned.

… The boycott offered Jews the first real weapon they-have ever had, thanks to the modern development of international trade. The Haavarah dashes that weapon from their hands. The Haavarah has actually exerted itself, if our information be correct, to promote an increase of the purchase of German products in Palestine…

But, at least, let not our critics try to fool us with the argument- that if the Ha'avarah helps Jewish national reconstruction it does not transgress against Jewish national dignity. Building the new Judea on an “unclean " transaction is not our idea of preserving Jewish dignity!’

Today the ‘JC' is a ‘newspaper’ that Goebbels would have given his eye teeth for. Its mission is to keep British Jews in ignorance of the reality of what is happening in Israel and Palestine and line them up in support of genocide. Strangely enough many Jews are not happy with being fodder for a ‘Jewish’ state that seems to be anything but Jewish.

The reality is that the Jewish Chronicle, whilst purporting to be horror stricken at the alleged increase in anti-Semitism does its best to increase anti-Semitism by constantly associating Jews, all Jews, with the war crimes of the Israeli state.

Although one should resolutely oppose attacks on Jews because of what Israel does, at the same time one should recognise that people are justifiably angered by the scenes of carnage and war crimes from Gaza. When the JC goes out of its way to stress Jewish support for Israeli war crimes is it any wonder that some people take them at their word and attack Jews as a result?

One of my favourite headlines in the JC

The JC is unrepresentative of British Jews

The JC is also increasingly unrepresentative of the Jewish community. In the last authoritative survey of the British Jewish community in 2015 The Attitudes of British Jews Towards Israel it was found that the number of Jews who identified as Zionists had dropped from 72% in 2010. A quarter of Jews supported sanctions against Israel and to the question do Palestinians have no legitimate claim to the land, as right-wing Zionists argue, just 14% supported this proposition as opposed to 72% who were opposed.

Yet the JC has consistently supported the right and far-right of the Zionist movement. It brooks no criticism of Israel and as I show below actively censors anything tending to put it in a different light. In short the JC has become increasingly unrepresentative of British Jews and more of a shrill Zionist voice lecturing and hectoring. The appointment of another far-right editor, Jake Wallis-Simons, formerly of the Telegraph merely accentuates this trend.

The exclusion of non-Zionist and anti-Zionist voices from the JC has contributed to its irrelevance. Most young Jews today come into contact with Palestinians and Jews who are not Zionists yet this reality has never entered the JC's ecosphere. The pretence that the West Bank is a haven of tranquility punctured only by anti-Semitic Palestinians is simply at odds with what people learn from other sources. They know that Israel is now considered by most people as an apartheid state in which messianic Jews rule the roost.

The growth of non and anti-Zionist Jewish groups has passed the JC by. Na’amod, Jews Against Genocide, Jews for Boycotting Israeli Goods, Jewish Voices for Labour, Jewish Network for Palestine, Jews for Justice in Palestine, Jewish Anti-Zionist Network, have sprung up yet the JC relates to the shrill loudmouths and far-right Zionists such as Jonathan Hoffman with his coterie of Tommy Robinson supporters.

My own experience of the Jewish Chronicle

I have been in conflict with the JC for most of my political life. I am the only person to have successfully taken the JC to the Press Council, the forerunner of today’s Independent Press Standards Organisation (IPSO). When PSC organised a Conference on Anti-Arab Racism in 1985, with funding from the then Greater London Council, the JC attacked the conference implying that PSC was anti-Semitic. When I wrote to them on behalf of PSC, the JC refused me a right of reply. The Press Council upheld my complaint that I should have had a right of reply.

One of a number of letters the JC printed from me

Although its editor the late Geoffrey D Paul and I never saw eye to eye, he nonetheless invariably allowed me access to the letters columns of the paper although of course there was usually in reply a deluge of angry Zionists.

My letter to the Guardian challenging Chaim Bermant's Obituary

Geoffrey Paul allowed, by Zionist standards anyway, a wide range of debate in the paper. He repeatedly defended the maverick columnist Chaim Bermant who supported negotiations with the PLO, something that was considered beyond the pale in polite circles at that time.

Bernard Joseph did not set out to distort or twist the truth unlike JC 'journalists' today

This was a time when the JC employed journalists as opposed to Zionist political hacks like David Rose. For example when I spoke at the 2007 UNISON Conference in support of BDS, the only Jewish person to do so, I took apart the usual Zionist accusations that supporters of Palestine were anti-Semitic supporters of Hamas. I got a rousing reception from the delegates and the motion passed overwhelmingly. The first person who came up to congratulate me on my speech was Bernard Josephs, the JC reporter. Bernard was an old school Zionist and certainly not a supporter of BDS but he appreciated the way I had dealt with the accusations of anti-Semitism.

Fast forward 13 years and under Stephen Pollard all was different. Professor Geoffrey Alderman, a Zionist who had written for the JC for nearly 46 years, being a weekly columnist for 14 years, criticised the IHRA because its 11 examples ‘embed numerous internal contradictions’. This was during the anti-Corbyn smear campaign which the JC was leading, with the IHRA as its main weapon. Such criticism was considered by Pollard as nothing less than sabotage.

Alderman then went on to blot his copybook even further when he wrote an article for The Spectator Is Jeremy Corbyn really anti-Semitic? reaching the conclusion that far from being anti-Semitic ‘The fact of the matter is that Corbyn has an impressive record of supporting Jewish communal initiatives.’

Under Geoffrey Paul Alderman would have been defended. Pollard however was incandescent with rage. Zionist ideologues such as Pollard don’t do debate. He was running a campaign of hate and the last thing he wanted was a cool, analytical look at Corbyn’s actual record in relation to Jews. What did Pollard do? He sent a curt email at the end of January 2020 to Alderman saying ‘“as editor I no longer wish to have you in the paper.”

Pollard adamantly refused, in a telephone call, to give his reasons for the decision but they are not hard to discern. Pollard, a hard-right Zionist and founder of the Islamaphobic Henry Jackson Society, would brook no dissent. It was an iron rule as far as he was concerned that Corbyn was anti-Semitic.

Pollard was perhaps one of the most dishonest figures to grace public life in Britain in the last 20 years. He was also a disaster as JC Editor taking the circulation from over 30,000 to under 20,000 and bankrupting the paper in the process. It was only because the JC was seen as too valuable to go under during the anti-Corbyn witchhunt that the JC was rescued, amongst others by John Ware, who produced the serially dishonest Panorama programme Is Labour Anti-Semitic?

But I have another reason for detesting Pollard. So much so that when he announced that he had cancer I thought that there might be divine justice after all.

The Case of Emily Honochowicz

On 3 July 2010 I wrote to Pollard about the case of an American Jewish art student, Emily Honochowicz. Emily had gone to study in Jerusalem for one year as part of her art degree. There she had met anti-occupation activists from the International Solidarity Movement and she had been particularly moved by the terrible things that the Palestinians were experiencing in the West Bank.

On hearing of Israel’s murder of 9 activists on the Mavi Marmara and Gaza Freedom Flotilla she and others had gone to stage a protest at the main gateway from Jerusalem to the West Bank, the Qalandiya checkpoint.  This was being policed by the Border Guard, a notoriously violent Israeli police unit. All of a sudden one of them shot, in breach of all regulations, a tear gas cannister directly at Emily with the result that she was blinded in one eye.

Emily was rushed, first to a hospital in Ramallah and then to Jerusalem’s Hadassah hospital where doctors were unable to save her eye. I was particularly moved by how a young Jewish girl had taken part in the kind of protest which is normal in any country calling itself a democracy and she had lost an eye as a result. How could this be in a state that calls itself Jewish?  Where were its Jewish values?

I wrote an article The Day an American Jewish Art Student Emily Henochowicz Lost an Eye and it occurred to me that perhaps the JC would consider this newsworthy. I knew that the evils perpetrated against Palestinians never made the JC columns, especially under Pollard, because it was an iron rule that British Jews should be kept in ignorance of what was happening in the occupied territories.

Much fun was had when we were stewarding the TUC Conference in Brighton - after everyone had gone home we dumped the Zionist propaganda in the nearest bin!

But Emily wasn’t a Palestinian. She was a Jewish girl. Surely this story merited a place in the JC? I had read an article in Ha’aretz Israel Refuses to Pay Medical Bills for American-Jewish Protester Who Lost Eye and found it outrageous. The Pig who had blinded Emily in one eye had broken all regulations and yet the Israeli government, which can spend thousands of pounds on takeaway meals for Prime Minister Netanyahu and his corrupt wife, didn’t have the decency to at least pay for the medical bills caused by its thuggish police force.

I wrote that

Emily, the daughter of an Israeli born father and granddaughter of holocaust survivors has learnt the hard way that Israel is an oppressive and racist regime.

The final insult of course is that Israel refuses to pay the medical bills for her treatment in hospital. Literally they want their pound of flesh.

The latter being a reference to Shylock and the Merchant of Venice.

I sent an email to Pollard suggesting that he might want to run this story, noting that

Instead of being an echo chamber to Jonathan Hoffman isn't it about time you actually started reporting the more uncomfortable facts? When people look back this period of the Jewish Chronicle it will come to be seen as one of its darkest and least glorious chapters.

Pollard immediately responded

‘Thank you for your email, which will make a fine addition to my 'delete' folder.’

In other words nothing that could upset the myth of Israel as the Middle East’s Only Democracy would be allowed to grace the pages of the Jewish Chronicle, even if it was someone who was Jewish who had experienced violence or discrimination.

I wrote a blog Jewish Chronicle Editor, Stephen Pollard says the blinding in one eye, by Israeli Border Guards of Emily Honchowicz, "will make a fine addition to my 'delete' folder." and to this day I consider Pollard, who learnt his trade under the pornographer and one-time owner of the Daily Express, Richard Desmond, as the human equivalent of dog waste. A man without a single redeeming feature.

Emily, in a fascinating interview with Democracy Now, described how she was cared for and looked after by Palestinians, despite their many worries, exploding the myth that Palestinians are gripped by a fatalistic and obsessive anti-Semitism. (see above)

In the pre-Pollard era the letters columns were relatively open

Emily came across in the interview as a wonderful and likeable girl who was trying to put her experiences behind her whilst displaying empathy and understanding for the Palestinians of Nabi Saleh

Pollard, who looks every bit as detestable as he is, proved that when it comes to the Zionist press in this country, lies and deceit always trump honesty and truth. The tragedy is that too many Jews are too blind to see that they being conned by a narrow Jewish nationalism that at the current time is  perpetrating genocide in Gaza.

Instead many Jews whine about a non-existent ‘anti-Semitism’, whilst keeping company with vile racists like Suella Braverman and then wonder why it is that some people assume that Jews and Genocide go together.

So no, I shall not be contributing to the Jewish Chronicle anytime soon. The sooner it dies the better for everyone but especially Britain’s Jews.

As for Stephen Pollard, I am reminded of the last stanza of Bob Dylan’s masterpiece, Masters of War:

And I hope that you die
And your death'll come soon
I will follow your casket
In the pale afternoon
And I'll watch while you're lowered
Down to your deathbed
And I'll stand over your grave
'Til I'm sure that you're dead

Tony Greenstein