The Real Question is Why Does Stand Up to Racism Refuse To Stand Up To Racism?
On Wednesday Brighton and Hove Trades Council voted by 9-4
not to support the Stand Up to Racism
march in London on March 18. This was because Scottish SUTR, since 2017, have
allowed Glasgow Friends of Israel (GFI) and the Confederation of Friends of
Israel – Scotland (COFIS) to take part in the march.
In 2018 Zionist groups were allowed to participate,
complete with police protection. As a result the Muslim Association of Britain alongside
the Muslim Council of Scotland refused to take part.
The SWP ‘invited’ the Convenor of Scottish SUTR Tallis Ahmed
to the meeting. Ahmed proceeded to lie and dissemble claiming that Care 4
Calais sponsored their march, denying that Muslim groups had boycotted it. She even
pretended that SUTR is democratic claiming that they had AGMs at which officers
were elected. A cursory glance at their website reveals no such democratic
inclinations.
What the SWP were unable to do was defend the presence of Zionist
groups on their march. The reason being that it is indefensible and thus they
were caught on the horns of a dilemma. How can you have an anti-racist march
with racist flags and groups taking part?
When I pointed out that a number of Black groups and
individuals had signed a letter
urging speakers not to take part in SUTR’s founding conference, Ahmed claimed
that Black Lives Matter was only a name! Almost the same as Keir Starmer calling them a ‘moment’.
The fact is that Southall Black Sisters and East End Sisters Uncut also signed the
letter.
Glasgow Friends of Israel make racist rape jokes about the Murder by an Israeli Sniper of 21 year old Palestinian Medic, Razan al Najar
15 local trade unionists signed an open letter calling on the
Trades Council not to back SUTR’s march in London. (see below)
Only last week there was a pogrom in
the Palestinian town of Huwara. One person was killed, 98 were injured,
attempts were made to burn Palestinians alive in their homes and throughout all
of this the Israeli army helped the settlers, dancing
with them afterwards in the streets whilst using stun grenades to violently
attack 400 Israeli Jews who came to express solidarity with the victims.
These are the friends of SUTR and the SWP
Bezalel Smotrich, the head of the Civil Administration in the
West Bank, called
for the ‘wiping out’ of the town of
Huwara, recalling the worst pogroms against the Jews of Europe.
It beggars belief that the Socialist Workers Party, who control
SUTR, should allow racists and Jewish Supremacists on an anti-racist march.
GFI Attack Jewish anti-Occupation group Na'amod
Every major human rights organisation, from Amnesty
International to Human
Rights Watch and Israel’s B’Tselem,
have concluded that Israel is an Apartheid State. B’Tselem described
Israel as
‘A
regime of Jewish supremacy from the Jordan River to the Mediterranean Sea’.
Apartheid is a system of racial supremacy and its
supporters have no place in any organisation which calls itself anti-racist.
Veterans of the
anti-Apartheid struggle in South Africa have
described Israel’s repression as worse than Apartheid in South Africa.
Archbishop Desmond Tutu observed
that
‘What's being done to the Palestinians at checkpoints, for us, it's the kind of thing we experienced in South Africa.’
After a
visit in July 2008 to the West Bank former Deputy Minister of Health Nozizwe
Madlala-Routledge MP explained:
“What I see
here is worse than what we experienced – the absolute control of people’s
lives, the lack of freedom of movement, the army presence everywhere, the total
separation and the extensive destruction we saw….racist ideology is also
reinforced by religion, which was not the case in South Africa.”
Yet SUTR, who claim to oppose racism, welcomes onto its
annual march against racism in Glasgow, two openly racist Zionist groups.
In 2019 GFI Chair, Sammy Stein was filmed
harassing a Scottish PSC [SPSC] stall in the company of Max Dunbar, a former
Treasurer of the BNP in Scotland with close links to open holocaust deniers.
Edward Sutherland, Christian Zionist, Anti-Semite and Member of Glasgow Friends of Israel
In May 2022 GFI member Edward Sutherland, a Christian Zionist.
was reprimanded
by the General Teaching Council for posting ‘vile’
anti-Semitic messages on Facebook using an alias, Stevie Harrison.
Ironically Sutherland’s defence was that ‘the messages were not antisemitic due to there being a “distinction”
between Zionism, a political position, and Judaism, a religion.’ Zionists
usually spend their time telling us that there is no difference! One of
Sutherland’s posts read ‘Looks like a
certain Zio’s big nose is out of joint.’
Palestinian home in Huwara burnt out by pogromists - their supporters march with SUTR
The GFI Facebook Group is a
racist sewer. Posts include:
·
The description of Israel’s murder of 3 Palestinians as ‘euthanasia’
·
The murder of 50 Muslims by a neo-Nazi in Australia which attracted
comments such as
‘it’s
payback time for the attacks that Muslims have perpetrated across the globe’ ‘what
goes around comes around so what’s the problem’ and ‘the whole attack was staged’
·
Advocating that a Palestinian activist ‘should be strangled with her own head scarf.’
Matthew Berlow, a member of GFI and a solicitor was fined
£500 for staging a fake graffiti attack on his home and then trying to blame SPSC
for it. This did not stop him taking part in SUTR’s march. See
Scottish
lawyer admits framing Palestinian group with fake vandalism attack
GFI Attack anti-racist musician Roger Waters
GFI’s Facebook page includes
attacks on Jewish peace group Brighton
and Hove Trades Council Muslim Association of Britain alongside
the Muslim Council of Scotland, Tallis Ahmed Starmer Huwara, Smotrich, Amnesty
International to Human
Rights Watch Desmond
Tutu Nozizwe
Madlala-Routledge Sammy SteinMax Dunbar, Edward Sutherland, a Christian Zionist.
was reprimanded
by the General Teaching Council Matthew Berlow, Na'amod, calls Roger Waters one of ‘the worlds’ best known anti-Semites’, calls for refusing entry to
Britain of an anti-Zionist rabbi, denies that Jewish settlements are illegal
under international law, attacks Humza Yousef, a Muslim candidate for First
Minister in Scotland for meeting with Hamas being part of the Scottish Islamic
Foundation and has a comment with 3 likes denying that the Palestinians even exist:
‘Every time one uses the word
Palestinian, one is perpetuating a MYTH"
I wrote on behalf of the Trades Council to Scottish SUTR
asking for
clarification as to what is the position this year.
Will GFI and COFIS be welcomed onto the march or will you make it clear to them
that they are not welcome and will be excluded if they attempt to join.
GFI Support Banning an anti-Zionist Rabbi from Britain
The reply was disingenuous. They claimed that neither Zionist
group had been welcomed, which is a lie. In 2019 a motion not to allow them to
participate was defeated in the SUTR organisers group. My anonymous
correspondent also claimed that
SUTR is a domestic campaign to mobilise against
racism and the far-right in Britain.
The Tory attack on refugees is being jointly undertaken with the French government. Racism in Britain originates in Britain’s colonial past. The SWP claims to be Marxists yet Marx called on workers of the world to unite.
I was informed that ‘The
demonstration is for everybody who
agrees with these core demands’. It beggars belief that GFI agree with
welcoming refugees. In Israel non-Jewish refugees are automatically
refused asylum.
In 2012 Prime Minister Netanyahu stated
that ‘"illegal infiltrators [i.e.
refugees] flooding the country" were threatening the security and identity
of the Jewish state.’ Has GFI ever condemned this? If not why would they
support asylum seekers coming to this country?
I also asked:
If SUTR considers itself a ‘domestic campaign’ mobilising
against racism why does it not mobilise against the increasing anti-Palestinian
racism that Palestinian students, academics and supporters are facing from
Zionist groups that manifests in abuse, vilification, silencing and in some
cases loss of livelihood?
The Zionist movement is prominent in attacking Black, Muslim and Palestinian students and academics. They targeted Shaima Dallalai, the Muslim President of NUS who was sacked and Shahd Abusalama, a lecturer who was first suspended and then forced out of her job.
Close relations have developed between
the Zionists and the far-Right resulting in Tommy Robinson attending
the Board of Deputies rally at the Israeli Embassy, in support of the attack on
Gaza, in May 2021.
UN Anti-Racism day was instituted
in 1966 in order to remember the 69 Africans gunned down by the South Africa police
at Sharpeville
in March 1960. To allow pro-apartheid groups to take part in the SUTR march is
to spit on the grave of those who were murdered.
As Margaret
Pacetta and John Hilley wrote
in the Morning Star of 13 March 2018
‘You cannot
stand up to racism while lying down to Israeli apartheid.’
The Annual Pogrom Through Jerusalem each May - GFI/COFIS have never condemned Zionist Racism
To Palestinians the Israeli flag is the equivalent of the
swastika for Jews. It is the flag of those who march through East Jerusalem
each year chanting
‘Death to the Arabs.’ It is the flag
of house demolitions.
It’s like expecting Black people to march alongside the
Confederate flag. The SWP are incapable of integrating anti-imperialist and anti-racist
politics. It is the politics of opportunism and left sectarianism.
Why? Because the SWP sees their primary task as building
their party. Everything else is secondary. SUTR has won the support of trade
union leaders by playing down their politics. Frightened of the false charge of
‘anti-Semitism’ if they banned Zionist groups, they have also conceded to the Zionists’
false ‘anti-Semitism’ campaign.
SUTR is an SWP front. It is their main recruiting tool and
they are willing to sacrifice the Palestinian struggle in order to win the
support of those to their right. Trade union leaders are happy to subcontract anti-racism
onto SUTR. That’s why SUTR doesn’t criticise trade union leaders who remain
silent about the Labour Party’s anti-refugee policies. Yvette Cooper criticised
Cruella Braverman’s refugee proposals because they won’t work, not on
principle. Rachel Reeves has gone further and criticised
the Tories for not deporting more.
SUTR seems to believe that since the majority of British Jews
are Zionists they should turn a blind eye to Zionism. They forget that Zionism was
founded on the belief that anti-Semitism could not be fought as it was inherent
in all non-Jews.
Racism was how imperialism justified colonising other
peoples’ countries. Palestine was a British colony between 1917 and 1948. By
allowing Zionist groups to march with them, SUTR has become complicit in
British racism.
Tony, you are also a hero on the Glasgow Friends of Israel Facebook page, thanks to your attacks on me. Why no mention of this in your condemnation of them? That you are being used by them to undermine pro-Palestinian activism? Your condemnation of the Neturei Karta, too, is grist to their mill
ReplyDeleteFor those who don't know, this is Peter Gregson who believes that I should stay silent on his antisemitism. For further details see https://azvsas.blogspot.com/2023/01/whilst-there-are-very-few-anti.html
DeleteI am not a hero to any Zionists but of course they can quote me. As I told Pete when he insisted on emailing me, even the devil can quote the scriptures and for good measure even dung beetles appreciate gourmet meals!
Peter needs to face up to the fact that no one in the Palestine solidarity movement will work with him because he is a loose cannon, who will not take advice and now counts among his friends Gilad Atzmon. He writes on the anti-Semitic site Redress (probably because no one else will print his rubbish).
Peter locates support for Zionism in Jewish power and people rather than seeing that it is the non-Jewish establishment which empowers local Zionists.
I have not condemned Neturei Karta, far from it. I respect them even if I don't agree with their politics, such as their exclusion of Orthodox Women from their protests.
Peter is referring to a solitary article I wrote criticising, not condemning, them in 2009 when they very ill advisedly held a joint meeting with the fascist and anti-Semitic Jobbik party. I have said nothing since and I have good relations with them.
I am sorry that NK, who are very good natured, have teamed up with Peter in a tour of Britain. It is a mistake but I have no intention of condemning them.
The Zionists are desperate to legitimise the apartheid state of Israel. They fail every time they are described accurately.
ReplyDeletePalestine was a League of Nations mandate not a colony. A slight difference but one nonetheless. (by Advocatus Diaboli)
ReplyDeleteYes Palestine was a Mandate but it was ALSO a colony. It was administered by the Colonial Office. Colonies were legally divided into a number of different categories - Protectorates, Trusteeships, Mandates etc. The label didn't matter. What mattered was the underlying reality
DeleteQuite right. Except that Britain ruled it like a colony and failed to observe all the terms of the Mandate which included:
DeleteArticle 2 "...also for safeguarding the civil and religious rights of all the inhabitants of Palestine, irrespective of race and religion."
Article 6 refers to "ensuring that the rights and position of other sections of the population [i.e. non-Jews] are not prejudiced..."
Article 9 refers to "...a complete guarantee of their rights". This with reference to the "natives". (Well if was written in 1920, but it does kind of smack of colonialism.)
Article 17 is an interesting one which prohibited the Administration to raise military forces. Despite this both Arab and Zionist Palestinian soldiers fought in North Africa and elsewhere during WWII.
Yes I'm cherry picking, just as you are nit picking. The mandate was simply another British scam to grab more of the Ottoman lands to expand its empire and in so doing to outwit French designs on the same territory. It also saw off Wilson's crazy ideas about self determination, which threatened the whole Sykes-Picot land grab.
You could have also pointed out that between 1917 and 1920 it was in fact occupied Ottoman territory, but what's the point?