3 February 2023

Kim Johnson MP called Israel an Apartheid Fascist State – When Threatened With Losing the Whip She Immediately Recanted

 Johnson’s Cowardice When Confronted With Starmer’s McCarthyism Speaks Volumes About the Socialist Campaign Group and the Labour Left

It was nothing if not predicable. A member of the Socialist Campaign Group collapsed like a pack of cards when threatened by Starmer’s bullies. Instead of standing her ground and defying Starmer to do his worst, instead of defending what she had said, she chose to preserve her parliamentary career above principle.

What a contrast with holocaust survivor Stefan Kapos, who when he was told last week by a Labour apparatchik not to speak at a Holocaust Memorial Day meeting organised by the Socialist Labour Network, or he could be expelled, immediately resigned. The SCG prefer instead to capitulate.

If John McDonnell, Zara Sultana and the rest of the opportunists in the SCG had any principles, still less strategy, they would have immediately backed up Kim Johnson and gone on the offensive, defending that she had said, calling out Starmer’s racism and challenging him to do racist worst. Instead they remained silent.

When, during Israel attacked Gaza in 2009 Gerald Kaufman, a Jewish MP who was not even on the left, compared Israel to Nazi Germany, no one even thought that he should be disciplined. Even Tony Blair, a renowned Zionist, didn’t entertain the idea of removing the Whip. That shows just how far down the road we have come with Starmer.

Gerald Kaufman's famous speech comparing the Israeli Army to the Nazis

When Kaufman died in 2017 the Jewish Chronicle told its readers that he was ‘reviled’. Marcus Dysch wrote:

He compared Israeli soldiers serving during the Gaza conflict of 2009 to the Nazis who forced his ancestors to flee Poland.

His “here we are, the Jews again” comment when Labour MP Louise Ellman rose to speak in the chamber in 2011 was not just crass, but specifically targeted, knowingly full well the hurt that would – and did – follow.

It is not as if there isn’t proof a plenty that Israel is an apartheid state. It is also clear to all except wilful racists like Starmer, that Israel’s government is stuffed with extreme racists and fascists.

All the major human rights organisations, from B’Tselem’s Report to  Human Rights Watch’s A Threshold Crossed to Amnesty International’s Israel’s apartheid against Palestinians, that Israel is guilty of the crime of Apartheid.

Starmer embracing Louise Ellman, the MP for Liverpool Riverside and Tel Aviv South, who defended the Israeli army's abuse of Palestinian children

If we could turn the clock back 90 years then Starmer would have had no difficulty explaining why Hitler had come to power. He is a man without principle dedicated to defending imperialism come what may.

When a delegate at Labour’s conference last September pointed out that the Zelensky regime had banned trade unions and incorporated neo-Nazis into his regime Starmer had him immediately suspended.

Kim Johnson prostrating herself at the feet of Starmer & the Israel lobby

The truth of what Kim Johnson said, before she recanted like a victim of Stalin’s purges, is self evident. Israel has de facto annexed the West Bank but denies any rights to its Palestinian inhabitants unlike the Jewish settlers who have the full protection of Israeli civil law.

Israeli maps treat the West Bank as part of Greater Israel. The Green Line has long disappeared. In the West Bank two different sets of laws apply to two different peoples – Jews and Palestinian. That is the quintessential definition of apartheid.

But within Israel Apartheid also exists. There are over 60 laws which explicitly discriminate against Israeli Palestinians.

The 2003 Citizenship Law prevents Israeli Palestinians from marrying Arab spouses living outside Israel. The Admissions Committee Law 2013 enables hundreds of Jewish communities to bar Israeli Arabs from living amongst them.

The Jewish Nation State Law reserves national self-determination only for ‘the Jewish people.’ 93% of Israeli land is reserved solely for the use of Jews via the Jewish National Fund.

Arabs are confined within their towns and villages which are unable to expand, unlike Jewish towns because they are deliberately surrounded by Jewish communities.

In the Galilee, East Jerusalem and the Negev/Naqab there is a deliberate policy of Judaisation. If you want an equivalent then you only need to recall Nazi Germany’s policies of deJewification’.

Israel isn’t a fascist but a settler colonial state but that doesn’t make it better. Arguably it makes it worse. America wasn’t a fascist state but its settlers exterminated millions of the indigenous native Indians.

The Israeli government is, however, stuffed with people who proudly declare that they are fascists. Bezalel Smotrich, Israel’s new Finance Minister who is in charge of the Civil i.e. Military Administration in the West Bank said that ‘My voters don’t care if I’m a homophobe or fascist’. Miri Regev, Israel’s new Minister of Transport said ‘I’m happy to be a fascist’.

Smotrich is on record as opposing having Arab women share maternity wards with Jewish women but to Starmer this too is ok.

Even the European Union of Jewish Students has warned against ‘Fascist’ Ben Gvir, the new Police Minister. Calling Israeli Ministers and the Israeli state ‘fascist’ is commonplace but for Keir Starmer, any criticism of the United States’s racist Rottweiler is forbidden.  

The Independent reported that:

Sir Keir’s spokesman denounced the use of both the terms “apartheid” and “fascist”, saying many will have taken offence at the latter in particular. He told reporters: “As a first step we would obviously want her to withdraw the remarks that she used for sure.”

Johnson’s crime was giving ‘offence’.  No doubt many Germans would have taken offence at criticism of Hitler’s regime and racist Whites like Starmer would have taken offence at criticism of South Africa but so what? If telling the truth gives offence then so be it.

If anything the description of people like Bezalel Smotrich and Ben Gvir as fascists is too kind. The proper description of them is Jewish or Judeo-Nazis. The Times of Israel reported, on election night Gvir

interrupted his own victory speech… to pay tribute to the radical settler Rabbi Dov Lior and to his former political partner Bentzi Gopstein, the head of the racist and homophobic Lehava organization.

Rabbi Dov Lior is Chairman of the Jewish Rabbinical Council of the West Bank and Chief Rabbi of Kiryat Arba and Hebron. He is also an unreconstructed racist, even by Israeli standards.

In 1994, he supported the murder by an American settler, Baruch Goldstein, of 29 Palestinian worshippers at the Ibrahimi Mosque. Lior then issued a religious edict, saying,

There is no such thing as enemy civilians in war time. The law of our Torah is to have mercy on our soldiers and to save them....A thousand non-Jewish lives are not worth a Jew's fingernail.

Lior praised Goldstein, calling him a “great saint and rabbi … may his memory be blessed”. Ben Gvir, until recently, had a poster on his wall of Baruch Goldstein.

Not to be outdone, Rabbi Yaacov Perrin, officiating at Goldstein’s funeral, told mourners that even 1 million Arabs “are not worth a Jewish fingernail.” Angry voices in the congregation shouted, “We are all Goldsteins!” and “Arabs out of Israel!”

Several months after the massacre, Lior told disciples in Kiryat Araba near the occupied West Bank city of Hebron

Jewish blood was redder than non-Jewish blood … and that a Jewish life is preferred by the Lord than a non-Jewish life.

In 2009 Rabbis Yitzhak Shapira and Yosef Elitzur wrote Torat HaMelech, a religious guide to killing non-Jews legally. Among their insights was the ruling that the ‘Prohibition 'Thou Shalt Not Murder' applies only 'to a Jew who kills a Jew.' Non-Jews are "uncompassionate by nature" and attacks on them "curb their evil inclination," while babies and children of Israel's enemies may be killed since "it is clear that they will grow to harm us." It was immediately endorsed by Dov Lior.

Another hero of Gvir is Benzi Gopstein of the fascist Lehava whose slogan is ‘assimilation is a holocaust’. Like its Nazi forebears it openly campaigns against miscegenation, sexual or personal relations between Jew and Arab.

Lehava thugs openly attack Arabs who they suspect of liaisons with Jewish women and in one attack 105 Palestinians were wounded and 22 hospitalised in a pogrom in Jerusalem.

Lehava activists were also responsible for arson at one of the few mixed Jewish-Arab schools, the Hand in Hand in Jerusalem. One of those who set fire to the school received 3 years in prison. If he had been a Palestinian the sentence would have been 3 or 4 times that.

As someone equally hostile to Christians Gopstein has advocated burning churches too. These are the friends of Israel’s new Police Minister, Itamar Ben Gvir who is now in charge of directing Israel’s police. Yet Labour’s racist leader, Keir Starmer, objects to calling the Israeli government ‘fascist’ or apartheid. But then Starmer or was quoted as saying ‘I support Zionism without qualification.’

There is nothing that Israel could do that would disturb Starmer and Biden. All that matters is its strategic role in the Middle East. Labour has a racist as leader yet the SCG, instead of following in the footsteps of previous generations of socialists like Mervyn Stockwood and Lord Soper keeps quiet in the hope of keeping their parliamentary seats.

There really is nothing more contemptible than the likes of Kim Johnson or Richard Burgon apologising for even the slightest criticism of Zionism or Israel.

Tony Greenstein

10 comments:

  1. Kim Johnson's constituents, who know very well that Israel IS an apartheid State with fascist tendancies, must be fuming at her complete lack of guts to stand up to Starmer who can surely be called the head of the Israel lobby in Parliament. Her sudden about turn could only have come about because of threats from Starmer and/or his henchmen. The honourable course of action would have been for her to stand up in Parliament, describe those threats, and say she would not change one word of her original statement.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Remember what happened to her sister. Starter deserves a public whipping for his lack of support

      Delete
  2. I'm sure I heard something a few years ago about one of those far-right groups setting up fake profiles on dating sites to entrap people and carrying out attacks on some Jewish businesses they deemed unkosher.

    ReplyDelete
  3. "There really is nothing more contemptible than the likes of Kim Johnson or Richard Burgon apologising for even the slightest criticism of Zionism or Israel."

    And all this is due to the Zionist Lobby... Oooopsie, you're not supposed to say that either!

    Mad Mel Flips must be chuffed!!

    ReplyDelete
  4. hi Tony,

    your headline and conclusion don't follow from your argument, and are politically wrong in my opinion. Everything you say about Israel, apartheid, and fascism is fine with me. You are also absolutely right that "If John McDonnell, Zara Sultana and the rest of the opportunists in the SCG had any principles, still less strategy, they would have immediately backed up Kim Johnson and gone on the offensive, defending what she had said, calling out Starmer’s racism and challenging him to do his racist worst. Instead they remained silent."

    So where did that leave her? You might wish Kim Johnson were Haneen Zoabi, but she isn't. She put her head above the parapet, the Party machine came down on her, no-one stood up alongside her, she then capitulated, and you blame... her!

    Furthermore, and this is not a criticism of your article, when Corbyn, McDonnell, and McCluskey threw Ken Livingstone under a bus for pointing to the relations between the Nazis and Zionism, they made exactly the same demand as that to which Kim Johnson capitulated: that his statements could not be tolerated as they were "deeply offensive". In other words, the problem goes beyond Starmer.

    ReplyDelete
  5. trying again to post this. Your headline and conclusion don't follow from your argument, and are politically wrong in my opinion. Everything you say about Israel, apartheid, and fascism is fine by me. You are also absolutely right that "If John McDonnell, Zara Sultana and the rest of the opportunists in the SCG had any principles, still less strategy, they would have immediately backed up Kim Johnson and gone on the offensive, defending what she had said, calling out Starmer’s racism and challenging him to do his racist worst. Instead they remained silent."

    So where did that leave her? She put her head above the parapet, the Party machine came down on her, no-one stood with her, she folded, and you blame... her! You may wish she were Haneen Zoabi, but she isn't. At least she had the guts to put the question to Sunak.

    Finally, and not a criticism of your article, it's worth remembering that when Corbyn, McDonnell and McCluskey threw Ken Livingstone under a bus for pointing to the relations between Zionism and the Nazis in the 1930s, they made the same demand that now faced Kim Johnson: Livingstone's comments must be repudiated as they were "deeply offensive". In other words, the problem goes beyond Starmer.

    Greg

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Greg, you haven't say why my headline and conclusion don't follow from my argument. Yes she put her head above the parapet and having done so she should have defended her position and gone back to her constituents. Not recant and humiliate herself.

      You don't have to be a Zoabi to be honest and forthright. As it is she has made a fool of herself and discredited the arguments she put across.

      Yes of course Starmer doesn't come out of nowhere. This whole identity nonsense about 'offence' as if you can't give offense to racists and fascists shows just where the Left has ended up

      Delete
    2. trying again - not sure what the problem is in posting here. Your key para, which I quoted, could be headlined "Socialist Campaign Group leaves pro-Palestinian MP facing Starmer's wrath alone" .

      Your comment makes a good point about her constituents. Some of us have written to support her decision to raise the subject of Israel's escalating attacks on Palestinians during PMQs, and to express hope that she will continue to break the silence on Palestine. In any case, the issue is not going away.

      Greg

      Delete
  6. Starmer and his shower of ruthless Zionist thugs will flatten anyone who shows weakness against them, Jeremy Corbyn was the lesson everyone should learn from. Unfortunately Kim Johnson has shown a weakness which will debilitate her.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I'd be very surprised if Kim didn't forsee the (contrived) condemnation she would receive for saying what she said. But what difference would it have made if she'd REFUSED to apologise. She would almost definitely have been suspended and had the whip removed, and condemned and vilified and demonised even MORE virulently and ferociously for refusing to do so. By the WHOLE of the MSM and beyond! And ditto any members of the SCG who'd supported her.

    As for the comparison with Stephen Kapos, how much coverage in the MSM and Jewish newspapers did his resignation (and his resignation letter) receive. Absolutely zilch of course. And for the obvious reason.

    The reality is that she must have known in advance that she would cause a storm by saying what she said, and despite apologising, the MSM et al couldn't very well report it without quoting what she initially said - AND what she said in her apology - which was to remind or inform millions of people (via the MSM) that Amnesty and other human rights organisations have concluded that Israel is an apartheid state, and ALSO, that there has been an 'increase in human rights violations against Palestinian civilians, including children'.

    I'm not gonna go through what various MSM said in their coverage, but there was in fact quite a lot of indirect support for what Kim said, for want of a better way of describing it. For example, the Mirror coverage finished with the following:

    In a statement today Amnesty accuses the Israeli government of a series of deadly raids, including one on a refugee camp in Jenin that killed 10 on January 26.

    The following day seven Israeli civilians were killed in a revenge attack, the human rights group said in a statement.

    Amnesty has accused the Israeli government of stepping up "collective punishment" as a result of these killings.

    Agnès Callamard, Amnesty International’s Secretary General, said in a statement today: “The devastating events of the past week have exposed yet again the deadly cost of the system of apartheid.

    "The international community’s failure to hold Israeli authorities to account for apartheid and other crimes has given them free rein to segregate, control and oppress Palestinians on a daily basis, and helps perpetuate deadly violence.

    "Apartheid is a crime against humanity, and it is frankly chilling to see the perpetrators evade justice year after year."

    And in The Independent article it said the follwing:

    Benjamin Netanyahu was sworn in as leader of the most right-wing and religiously conservative government in Israel’s history at the end of December. The region has seen an alarming spike in Israeli-Palestinian violence in recent weeks.

    And there were certainly a few of the MSM - including The Mail - that quoted Momentum as saying the following:

    Sir Keir's decision to reprimand Ms Johnson over her comments prompted a new rift between the Labour leader and left-wing group Momentum.

    They hit out at 'another outrageous abuse of power by Starmer, this time to silence wholly legitimate criticism of the Israeli government'.

    'Israel has been termed an apartheid state by Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch. Its new far-right government has been widely condemned. Facts,' the group added on Twitter.

    'What does it say about free speech in the Labour Party, when MPs face *disciplinary action* for citing internationally-renowned human rights organisations on the atrocities being committed against the Palestinian people?'

    And it also quotes Karla McLaren of Amnesty International UK.

    I wouldn't mind betting that quite a few people have been woken up to the bullying tactics of Starmer and Co (and his fellow Tories) by this episode!

    ReplyDelete

Please submit your comments below