PayPal is a signed up supporter of the Apartheid State of Israel and that it would appear is the reason for Removing My Account
PayPal's policy in the West Bank and Gaza Strip is a form of digital discrimination, whereby Palestinians cannot access the service, while Israeli settlers in illegal settlements a few miles away can. PayPal also deprives Palestinians of their right to access the global economy. Even users who manage to sign up are often deplatformed once their identities are discovered.It was an innocuously headed email ‘We need some information regarding your PayPal account (Ref ID - 3236271647)’ but like most things from United States Corporations it was a lie. They didn’t want or require any information. Quite the contrary. After 15 years of having an account, PayPal had decided to remove my account –without warning.
As
is always the case with corporate liars they gave a generic excuse:
‘Due to the nature of your activities, we have chosen to
discontinue service to you in accordance with PayPal's User Agreement. As a
result, we have placed a permanent limitation on your account.’
And what were the
nature of my activities? Perhaps the money I had sent to organisations in Gaza in
order that the recipients might survive Israel’s starvation blockade? Surely not.
After all the good ol’ United States supports democracy and freedom in
the world – well everywhere bar Palestine anyway!
It is of course a
mystery but in reality it is no mystery in so far as it is clear that the
reason for my removal is clearly political or as they put it ‘the nature of your activities’.
I protested and
appealed and their first instance response was ‘Please be advised that due to the violation of PayPal's Acceptable Use
Policy, your account will remain permanently limited.’
The PayPal User Agreement states that PayPal, at its sole discretion, reserves
the right to limit an account for any violation of the User Agreement,
including the Acceptable Use Policy.’
Which is about as
clear as mud because they provide no information as to what I have done which
violates their User Agreement. I therefore sent PP the following appeal:
26/07/2022
11:58
Dear Paypal,
Today you have today closed my account
for an alleged infringement of terms after 15 years with you. You have given me
absolutely no reason bar the generic one
Due to the nature of your activities,
we have chosen to discontinue service to you in accordance with PayPal's User
Agreement.
You have given me no indication as to
what these ‘activities’ that you object to are. The reality is that I have been
subject to a complaint by person or persons unknown. It does not take much
guesswork to work out who. I have been subject to malicious complaints by
racists unknown and you have jumped accordingly like an obedient dog.
If there was any serious complaint or
infringement by me then you would have informed me and asked for my response
but corporate ‘justice’ is to ask no
questions but simply to rule accordingly.
This is of course outrageous. You haven't told me the slightest detail of what
my supposed infringement is. You have
just said there is one. The suspicion
must be that this is political not a breach of terms. Of course you have
absolute power to do this but this is an abuse of power for which US financial
corporations are well known and I shall treat it as such and publicise it as an
attack on a well known Jewish anti-Zionist blogger.
It would seem that my real offence is
opposing the world's only Apartheid state, Israel.
It is strange that you have never
brought any breach of terms to my attention before in the 15 years I have had a
Paypal account. I have done nothing today that I haven't done in the past.
Your very inability to provide me with
a specific and detailed account of my breach suggests that there isn't one and
that you are simply operating on behalf of Israeli/United States foreign policy
which is to support the dispossession of the Palestinians, the assassination of
Shireen Abu Akleh, the theft and demolition of Palestinian homes and much more.
I also note that you have done the same
to the accounts of many Palestinian human rights activists so I should take
your action as some kind of compliment.
I will of course notify all those who have ever had any transactions
with me on the account, which fortunately I have always recorded.
This decision is shameful and if you
have any shame, which is unlikely for a financial mega corporation, you will
reverse this decision, apologise and provide suitable compensation for the
waste of my time.
Yours faithfully,
They
promised to get back to me within 24 hours but what is one lie amongst
many? Since then I have been researching
PayPal’s policy towards Palestine and Palestinians. It appears that it is PayPal’s policy not to
provide Palestinians with any facilities whatsoever in Occupied West Bank but
to provide the Zionist settlers there with all the facilities they want. In other words PayPal is actively complicit
in the oppression of the Palestinians and actively supportive of the
occupation.
As
an international payment organisation it is very difficult to boycott PP. I understand that but given their extreme
pro-Zionist partiality, something common of course to all US social media and
financial corporations it is important that we give publicity to their
nefarious activities and consider how best to respond to their behaviour.
I
have posted on my blog appeals for donations to help with the upkeep of my blog such as hosting costs, protection
etc. At the moment they ask people to
send it via PayPal. Obviously this is
not longer possible.
I would therefore ask people to
make any donations in the future to the following account:
Name of Account: Brighton and Hove Unemployed Workers
Centre
Account No: 0409 3879
Sort Code: 09-01-50
Reference: Web donations
I
post below a number of articles as to the nature of PayPal’s racism:
Tony
Greenstein
Why Is PayPal Denying Service to Palestinians?
October 12, 2021
For many years, Palestinian rights defenders have championed
the cause of Palestinians in the occupied territories, who are denied access to
PayPal, while Israeli settlers have full access to PayPal products. A recent campaign, led by
Palestinian digital rights group 7amleh, calls
on PayPal to adhere to its own code
of business conduct and ethics, by halting its discrimination against
residents and citizens of Palestine. 7amleh has also published a
detailed report on PayPal’s actions in Palestine.
This is not the first time PayPal has denied service to a
vulnerable group; the company routinely cuts off payments to those engaged in
sex work or the sale of sexually explicit content, and last year, PayPal
division Venmo was sued for blocking payments associated with Islam or Arab
nationalities or ethnicities.
Just four months ago, EFF
[Electronic Frontier Foundation] and 21 other rights groups wrote to PayPal,
taking the company to task for censoring legal, legitimate transactions, and
calling on both PayPal and Venmo to provide more transparency and
accountability on account freezes and closures. Our coalition's demands
included a call for regular transparency reports, meaningful notice to users,
and a timely and meaningful appeals process. These recommendations align
with the Santa Clara Principles on
Transparency and Accountability in Content Moderation, developed by free
expression advocates and scholars to help companies protect human rights when
moderating user-generated content and accounts.
It is unclear why PayPal chose to deny service to
Palestinians, but they're not unique. Many American companies have taken an overly
broad interpretation of anti-terrorism statutes and sanctions, denying
service to entire groups or geographic areas—rather than narrowly targeting
those parties whom they are legally obligated to block. This practice is deeply
troubling, causing serious harm to those who rely on digital services for their
basic needs.
PayPal is among the most global of payment processors, and
for many it is a lifesaver, allowing people to sidestep local banks'
extortionate overseas transfer fees and outright
prohibitions. PayPal is how many around the world purchase goods
and services from abroad, pay freelancers, or send money to family. By denying
access to Palestinians, PayPal makes it hard or even impossible to engage in
the normal commerce of everyday life.
We call on PayPal to explain their decision to deny services
to Palestinians. And we renew our call—and that of our co-signers—for PayPal to
review its practices to implement the Santa Clara Principles and permit lawful
transactions on its platform, halting its discrimination against marginalized
groups.
PayPal closes
pro-Palestinian group’s account in collusion with Israeli government
World
Socialist Web Site
9 August 2018
PayPal has
closed the account of the French web site Agence Media Palestine in
response to a global campaign by Israel to organise a crackdown on Palestinian
supporters and critics of Israel, using fabricated claims of anti-Semitism.
The closure
of the account by the American payment-processing corporation poses
difficulties for Palestinians and Palestinian journalists, as there are few
other international payment mechanisms. It marks a dangerous new stage in the
ongoing campaign to isolate the Palestinians, criminalise political expression
and censor freedom of speech on the Internet.
Agence Media
Palestine, a Palestine solidarity
organisation, publishes articles on Palestine in French, translating many from
sources published elsewhere. It lists as its supporters prominent figures in
France, such as the late author and concentration camp survivor Stéphane
Hessel, Israeli filmmaker Eyal Sivan and human rights activist Mireille
Fanon-Mendès France.
Within hours
of Agence Media Palestine receiving notification from PayPal that it had
closed its account, without citing any reason or violations of the terms of
agreement, the web site received an email from Benjamin Weinthal, saying, “Your organisation lists PayPal as a
donation method, but the payment is blocked.”
He asked, “Did PayPal close your account? If so, what
was the reason for the closure?”
“Is your account in violation of France’s anti-discrimination law?”
Weinthal was
gloating. He is a Berlin-based journalist and research fellow for the American
neo-conservative group, the Foundation for the Defence of Democracies (FDD).
The FDD works closely with the Israeli government and has sought to discredit
the boycott, divestment and sanctions (BDS) movement for Palestinian rights by
linking it with terrorism, Hamas and Iran. The Jerusalem Post, along
with a host of right-wing media organisations, regularly publish his articles.
According to
the Electronic Intifada web site, Weinthal described the smear tactics
he uses to engineer crackdowns on individuals and organisations that he claims
are anti-Semitic because of their criticisms of Israel at a meeting of Israel
lobbyists in Europe in 2016.
Outlining a
playbook that will be familiar to the thousands of workers and young people in
the UK now seeing Labour Party leader Jeremy Corbyn slandered, he said, “You have to exaggerate to get these ideas
across, because they don’t understand what contemporary anti-Semitism is, many
of them.”
He admitted
to using smear tactics as an essential component of his work and boasted of
getting the journalists Max Blumenthal and David Sheen banned from the German
parliament in 2014. He explained how he had compared Blumenthal, who is Jewish,
to Horst Mahler, a former left-wing activist who became a Nazi.
Weinthal
also described how he had tried to put pressure on PayPal and banks to close
the accounts of human rights and civil society groups, focusing on groups
across France, Germany and Austria.
The FDD
functions as a front for the Israeli government, as Sima Vaknin-Gil, Israel’s
director-general of the Ministry of Strategic Affairs, admitted.
Speaking on
an Al-Jazeera undercover investigation into the Israel lobby in the US
that has yet to be aired--due to pressure by Israel on the Qatari government
which funds the news channel--Vaknin-Gil stated that the FDD was “working on” projects for Israel
including “data gathering, information
analysis, working on activist organisations, money trail.”
“We have FDD,” and “We have others working on this.”
According to
the documentary, the FDD operates as an agent of the Israeli government,
despite not being registered as such in accordance with US law.
The day
after PayPal closed Agence Media Palestine’s account, Weinthal authored
an article falsely claiming that organisations supporting the BDS campaign are
“in violation of the Lellouche Law, which
makes it illegal to target Israelis based on their national origin.” This
is the same claim he used in January after PayPal closed the account of another
campaign group, Association France Palestine Solidarité.
Agence Media
Palestine accused Paypal of an “arbitrary act,” saying it was
impossible to “ignore the links between
PayPal and the extreme right-wing propagandist Benjamin Weinthal.”
It added
that unless PayPal justified its action, it “reserves the right to take legal action.”
The web site
said that it might launch an “information
campaign about this discriminatory act for the benefit of a state that has just
passed an apartheid law,” a reference to Israel’s recent nation-state law
that privileges the rights of Jews above Israel’s other citizens.
PayPal has
yet to reply substantively to Agence Media Palestine ’s letters.
PayPal processes
more than $300 million in sales transactions every day, around 18 percent of
the world’s e-commerce sales, and has a market capitalisation of some $100
billion. It has a long record of using its position to conduct political
censorship on behalf of the US state and its allies.
Recently,
the corporate giant blocked sales of the World Socialist Web Site
pamphlet, The Struggle Against Imperialism and for Workers’ Power in
Iran.
PayPal,
along with MasterCard, VISA, American Express, Western Union and Bank of
America, also collaborated with the Obama administration in 2010 by imposing a
more than seven-year-long financial blockade on the anti-secrecy organisation
WikiLeaks, preventing it from receiving donations.
PayPal has
also blocked the sale of publications and the use of its services by
organisations linked with Iran, under the pretext of abiding by the US-led
sanctions regime, imposed by the US and European powers to cripple Iran’s
economy and destabilise its government.
PayPal’s
action is part of a broader censorship drive by the US technology and social
media giants, including Facebook, Google, Amazon and Twitter, that work closely
with US intelligence agencies as well as Israel and its military intelligence
organisations. In effect, they have given Prime Minister Benyamin Netanyahu’s
right-wing government the power to censor criticism by removing it from the
Internet.
Last
January, the New York Times confirmed an earlier report from Al-Jazeera
that said, “Israel submitted 158 requests
for Facebook over the past few months to remove what Israel deemed as ‘inciting
content,’ and the company complied with 95 percent of those requests.”
The Times’s
chief White House correspondent Peter Baker wrote, “Israeli security agencies monitor Facebook and send the company posts
they consider incitement,” and “Facebook
has responded by removing most of them.”
Palestinian
and international human rights groups have challenged Facebook over its role in
censoring Palestinian voices online and sharing information with the Israeli
government, which has arrested hundreds of Palestinians over Facebook posts.
In September
2016, Facebook executives met Israel’s Justice Minister Ayelet Shaked and
Public Security Minister Gilad Erdan, who heads the campaign against the BDS
movement, to improve “cooperation against
incitement to terror and murder.” Since then, it has worked closely with
Israel to silence Palestinian criticism of Israel.
Israel’s
Ministry of Justice published a report a year later, stating that its cyber
unit handled 2,241 cases of online content and succeeded in getting 70 percent
of it removed.
Jordana
Cutler, Facebook’s head of policy and communications in Israel, admitted that
the social media company works “very
closely with the cyber departments in the justice ministry and the police and
with other elements in the army and the Shin Bet [Israel’s internal security
service].” She was previously a senior adviser to Netanyahu.
Unit 8200,
the Israel Defence Forces’ cyber spy agency, monitors social media and other
forms of electronic communication. It employs Israeli soldiers and students as
well as “scouring Jewish communities abroad for young computer prodigies
willing to join its ranks” to spread propaganda online and try to get content
inimical to Israeli interests banned. Many such individuals work voluntarily
and independently.
In addition,
the government funds or sponsors projects that seek to place pro-Israel content
throughout the Internet and remove information Israel does not want people to
see.
Last December,
an Israeli report stated that the Strategic Affairs Ministry had a budget of
some $70 million to “stand at the forefront of the battle against
delegitimisation, adopting methods from the fields of intelligence and
technology.”
PayPal freezes out Palestine activists in France
Electronic Intifada
PayPal brushes-off request from Palestinian tech firms to access the platform
Techcrunch
PayPal is Facilitating the Colonization of Palestine, ACT NOW!
CodePink
It'll get worse before it (might) get better: companies with the financial clout of PP will be able to directly influence (buy, even) Gubmint policy on whatever.
ReplyDeleteeBay revoked my selling right a few years back. When I finally got someone of customer service to talk to me they trefured to divulge the reason for my ban! And they still haven't been restored either...
Never trusted PayPal.
ReplyDelete