Campaign Against Anti-Semitism has all the ethics of an untrained rotweiller
|They have no shame|
Sir Gerald Kaufman's famous speech in January 2009 during Israel's bloody Operation Cast Lead
|fake Zionist charity Campaign Against Antisemitism in disguise|
|Kaufman's speech comparing the murder of Palestinian civilians to that of the Nazis - Zionism recoils from such comparisons despite continually justifying Israel with reference to the Holocaust|
Sir Gerald Kaufman hadn’t even been buried when Zionist ‘charity’ Campaign Against Anti-Semitism launched a vicious and despicable attack on him. In an article entitled ‘Sir Gerald Kaufman MP’s words have left a rotting stain on our institutions’ the CAA demonstrated why they have all the ethics of Fred Goodwin and Philip Green combined.
Gerald Kaufman had a fine and distinguished parliamentary career. The last of Harold Wilson’s kitchen cabinet, he was someone who combined eccentricity and principle. He was a fierce proponent of the ban on fox hunting and I can remember when he was cornered by snarling supporters of hunting at Brighton Labour Party conference, who attacked him for being Jewish. Sir Gerald, unlike the racist frauds of the CAA, actually knew what anti-Semitism was like.
|Sir Gerald Kaufman|
What got the CAA’s goat was Gerald Kaufman’s support for the Palestinians. The pretext was speaking about ‘Jewish money’ and its influence in the Tory Party. If he had been a Zionist writing about Jewish money in the Jewish Chronicle then the CAA wouldn’t have batted an eyelid. Anti-Semitism only concerns them when Israel is under attack.
Zionism has never objected to anti-Semitism. On the contrary it has always seen in anti-Semitism an indispensable friend. As the founder of Political Zionism, Theodor Herzl wrote:
The anti-Semites will become our most dependable friends, the anti-Semitic countries our allies. We want to emigrate as a respected people.’ (Diaries pp. 83/4)
We see this today in the welcome that both the Israeli state and American Zionists have given to Trump and his anti-Semitic advisor, Steve Bannon of Breitbart. [see Anti-Semitism and the Alt-Right - Why Zionists have nothing to say about Trump’s Anti-Semitism]
Sir Gerald Kaufman the Jewish Father of the House of Commons came from the right-wing of the Labour Party. I am on the Marxist left of the Party. But both of us agreed on one thing – the Jewish experience of anti-Semitism meant that we cannot turn a blind eye to the pogroms, the violence and the extreme racism carried out in our name by Israel, which defines itself as a Jewish state of all people.
|Gerald Kaufman on a parliamentary delegation in Hebron where Judeo-Nazi settlers constantly attack the Palestinians under the umbrella of army protection|
The Campaign Against Anti-Semitism is a Zionist propaganda group set up in August 2014, when Israel was murdering over 2,000 Palestinians in Gaza, including 551 innocent children. Israel used white phosphorous bombs and the latest high tech weaponry to demolish clinics, schools, hospitals and housing. We all remember when 4 little children were murdered by an Israeli airplane as they played on Gaza’s beach. It has even banned Norwegian surgeon Mads Gilbert on ‘security’ grounds from Gaza because he dared criticise Israel.
The CAA has only ever had one purpose, to use the cry of ‘anti-Semitism’ to undermine support for the Palestinians of Gaza. In pursuit of that it has libelled and defamed anyone who stood up to the Israeli propaganda blitzkrieg. They particularly hate Jewish ‘traitors’ like Sir Gerald. The Zionist particularly love accusing Jewish anti-Zionists and even critical Zionists like Sir Gerald of being ‘traitors’ thus implying that we owe Israel some kind of loyalty – this is the anti-Semitic concept of ‘dual loyalty’.
|Norwegian surgeon Mads Gilbert, who operated in Gaza throughout the last 2 Israeli attacks, has been banned from Gaza on 'security' grounds - presumably he might attack them with his scalpel!|
Sir Gerald made his famous speech in the House of Commons comparing the Nazi murder of his grandmother in Staszow, Poland during WW2 to the murder of Palestinian grandmothers in Gaza. That was unforgivable because we must not compare Israel to Nazi Germany. Only Zionists may use the Holocaust to defend their bastard state of racial supremacy.
At the last count there were 22 articles attacking Sir Gerald on the CAA web site and barely a single mention of Britain’s 3 main fascist parties – the BNP, the EDL and the NF. All of them deny the Holocaust, all of them are anti-Semitic but of course the first two are also pro-Zionist. The CAA only engages in a few token prosecutions of fascists as a form of window dressing, a smokescreen to cover their main activity – undermining support for the Palestinians and defaming anti-Zionists.
Gerald Kaufman’s offence was apparently to say that “It’s Jewish money, Jewish donations to the Conservative Party – as in the general election in May – support from the Jewish Chronicle, all of those things, bias the Conservatives.’ Now I don’t happen to agree with Sir Gerald’s analysis. I think that the Conservative Party, just like New Labour before them, supports Israel because of Britain’s economic, political and military interests in the Middle East and in particular the need to hug the United States foreign policy wise.
|There were 590 references to 'Jewish money' in the Jewish Chronicle archive|
However what Sir Gerald said was not anti-Semitic. Undoubtedly Jewish Zionist donors give money to the Tory Party because they want to influence policy in a pro-Israeli direction. Most big donors do. Is that anti-Semitic? Or maybe it is the use of the phrase ‘Jewish money’? Well I did a search on the Jewish Chronicle website and came up with 590 similar occurrences of the phrase in their archive. It is a term commonly used within the Jewish community.
The Daily Mail, the paper that the CAA goes running to when it is under attack, carried an attack on Jeremy Corbyn by Michael Foster, the suspended Labour Party member who compared other members of the party to Nazi stormtroopers. What were the headlines?
A withering attack on the Labour leader by donor who backed party with £400,000 at 2015 Election - Michael Foster says Jewish supporters are worried about party's direction - No major Jewish donor has given cash to the central Labour Party this year or Labour funding crisis: Jewish donors drop 'toxic' Ed Miliband
What are those articles about if not Jewish donors giving Jewish money to the Labour Party (or not giving it)?
|Alderman was all in favour of banning Gerald Kaufman for 'anti-Semitism'|
The hypocrisy of Sir Gerald’s attackers was exemplified by Geoffrey Alderman, the Tory fogey and Jewish Chronicle columnist. Alderman wrote an article on 19th November 2015 about Sir Gerald entitled ‘A man who deserves banning’ for his use of the term ‘Jewish money’. It was somewhat ironic because Alderman, in an article entitled Obama’s False Iran Alternative on 13th August 2015 used the term ‘Jewish money’ no less than 3 times!
|Three times in one paragraph the hypocritical Alderman used the term 'Jewish money' - not once did fake Zionist 'charity' CAA complain|
When it comes to genuine anti-Semitism, Geoffrey Alderman is normally very tolerant. When David Whelan owner of Wigan Athletic football club wrote that ‘there is nothing like a Jew who sees money slipping through his fingers’ he was challenged by the . His response wasthat ‘I think they [Jews] are very shrewd people…. I think Jewish people do chase money more than everybody else. I don’t think that’s offensive at all.’
|Alderman does not consider the suggestion that Jewish people 'chase money more than everybody else' in the least anti-Semitic. After all no research has been done into it! However Kaufman was guilty as charged|
Whelan was subject to widespread criticism, not least from the Football Association and was in the end forced to relinquish control over Wigan Athletic. Geoffrey Alderman however leapt to his defence. In This football fuss is a bit rich (5.12.14.) Whelan was the victim of 'a sad and miserable tale of political correctness taken to new depths of absurdity'. Geoffrey must have taken to heart Jesus's injunction to love one's enemy as oneself. Certainly not something that would come from a Zionist Rabbi or the misnamed Campaign Against Anti-Semitism.
|One of many examples of the use of 'Jewish money' in the Jewish Chronicle|
Geoffrey went on to declare that 'In my view there is nothing remotely anti-Semitic in what Whelan is alleged by the Guardian to have said about Jews.' Indeed Geoffrey defended, indeed took pride, in the description of Jews as shrewd. As for chasing money, he was very open minded.
‘I have to admit at once that whether we Jews do indeed "chase" money "more than everybody else" is open to question because as far as I'm aware no serious research has ever been done on this subject. But it's certainly true that the Jewish view of money differs considerably from that of Christianity.
Clearly Geoffrey Alderman has a very high level of tolerance and sets the hurdle even higher when it comes to genuine anti-Semitism. Did the CAA call him out as a Jewish anti-Semite? Of course not. Geoffrey is a right-wing Zionist and the CAA never attacks Zionist anti-Semitism.
However when it came to Sir Gerald's comments, which are grounded in fact, Geoffrey was all for expelling him from the Jewish community, indeed expelling him by declaring a cherem (a religious edict). Kaufman had 'crossed a red line' and 'defamed the whole Jewish people.' http://azvsas.blogspot.co.uk/2011/05/jewish-chronicle-columnist-geoffrey.html
So the motto of the story is that if you are a Zionist then any amount of anti-Semitism is fine but if you support the Palestinians watch what you are saying.