Celebrate Apartheid with a fun filled Vacation in Israel
Despite not being anywhere near Europe, this year's Eurovision is being held in Apartheid Israel. The Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions movement is urging people to boycott this celebration of Apartheid
Those who accuse Ilhan Omar of 'anti‑semitism' are guilty of dishonesty and bad faith
Middle East Eye recently printed my article on
Dual Loyalty, one of the most frequent Zionist tropes. Their arguments are
dishonest and self-serving. I have made some slight changes to the printed
version.
I’ve
always had a problem with the concept of dual loyalty since I don’t owe loyalty
to any state! I agree with what Marx and Engels wrote in the Communist
Manifesto. The loyalty of the working class is to each other regardless of
nationality not to ones ruling class.
Palestinians
struggling against the Occupation have more in common with Black Lives Matter than with Mahmoud
Abbas and his cronies. As Mohammed Ali put it, ‘No Vietcong ever called me a nigger.’
In
the words of Samuel Johnson patriotism is the last
refuge of the scoundrel. Appeals to patriotism never apply to the rich and
powerful who invest in the cheapest non-unionised labour regardless of country
and then salt away their ill-gotten gains in offshore islands.
When
Ilhan Omar, the new Congresswoman from Minnesota responded to Glenn Greenwald’s
comment that “It’s stunning how much time US political leaders spend
defending a foreign nation even if it means attacking free speech rights of
Americans.” by tweeting “It’s all about the Benjamin’s baby.”all
hell broke loose.
The
Forward’s Batya Ungar-Sargon asked
Ilhan who she thought was paying American politicians to support Israel. In
response she got a brilliant one word answer ‘AIPAC’. The air was thick
with cries
of ‘anti-Semitism’
Even Donald Trump,
who came to power nakedly using anti-Semitic theme tunes, condemned the
Democrats as the 'anti-Jewish party' for not condemning Omar's
'terrible comments'
Trump's 'fine people' at Charlottesville
Even
Donald Trump, who came to power nakedly using anti-Semitic theme tunes
and for whom the neo-Nazis at Charlotteville were ‘fine
people’condemned
the Democrats as the ‘anti-Jewish party’ for not condemning Ilhan’s ‘terrible
comments’. This is the man who lit the fire
that resulted in the worst anti-Jewish massacre
in American history at Pittsburgh. The Donald does not do irony.
A Trump ad that was later pulled - Crooked Hilary complete with a Star of David
Ilhan
then repeated
much the same remarks at Washington DC's Busboys and Poets Cafe: ‘I want to
talk about the political influence in this country that says it is O.K. for
people to push for allegiance to a foreign country.”
According
to Jonathan Chait of New
York Magazinethis
statement was “much worse” than her previous statements,when she
ascribed support for Israel to financial contributions from the lobby.
‘Accusing
Jews of “allegiance to a foreign country” is a historically classic way of
delegitimizing their participation in the political system.’ Michelle Goldberg in the New York Times accused her of waging a series of ‘microaggressions.
Talk of dual loyalty
So
is it true? Is Ilhan Omar anti-Semitic and even more pertinently is talk of
‘dual loyalty’ in itself anti-Semitic? Well the first problem is that nowhere
did Ilhan mention Jews. She talked about a foreign country, Israel.
The
IHRA
definition of anti-Semitism, which Zionist groups have lobbied for strongly in
Britain, a definition which conflates
anti-Zionism and anti-Semitism, states that ‘Accusing Jewish citizens of
being more loyal to Israel... than to the interests of their own nations is
an illustration of anti-Semitism.’
For Republicans support for BDS and hostility to Israel is equal to 'antisemitism'
The
IHRA also states that ‘Denying the Jewish people their right to
self-determination’ is anti-Semitic! If Israel is the embodiment of Jewish
self-determination, and it calls itself the Jewish state, then why is it
anti-Semitic to accuse Jews of being more loyal to Israel? Would it be
anti-German to accuse Germans of being loyal to Germany?
Others such as Philip Weiss in
Mondoweiss have argued that far from Ilhan being anti-Semitic
even many Jewish writers agree that the question of dual loyalty is no myth.Palestinian American Congresswoman Rashida Tlaib made
similar comments when she said
in January that Senate supporters of anti-boycott legislation “forgot
what country they represent.”
If the concept of dual loyalty is anti-Semitic then that is because
Zionism rests on the anti-Semitic canard that Jews, wherever they live,
are aliens
If the concept of dual loyalty is anti-Semitic then that is because
Zionism rests on the anti-Semitic canard that Jews, wherever they live, are
aliens
So
are accusations of dual loyalty, in respect of Israel, anti-Semitic? The first
and most obvious point to make is that it is fundamental to Zionism that Jews
form a single nation. If the concept of dual loyalty is anti-Semitic then that
is because Zionism rests on the anti-Semitic canard that Jews, wherever they
live, are aliens and not part of the nations among whom they live.
In
2015 after the supermarket killings Netanyahu told
French Jews that their ‘real home’ was in Israel. A call repeated
by Israeli Labour Party leader Avi Gabbay after the Pittsburgh murders.
Jewish nationality
Israel
is unique among states in not having its own nationality. It has hundreds of
nationalities but only one, the Jewish nationality, is of any importance. That
is why Israel is an apartheid state. This issue was settled in 1972 in the case
of Tamarin
v State of Israel. George Tamarin
wanted to change his nationality from “Jewish” to “Israeli” but the Court
refused. Chief Justice Agranat ruled that:
‘the desire to create an Israeli nation
separate from the Jewish nation is not a legitimate aspiration. A division of
the population into Israeli and Jewish nations would … negate the foundation on
which the State of Israel was established.’
The
court went on to state that
‘There is no Israeli nation separate from the
Jewish People. The Jewish People is composed not only of those residing in
Israel but also of Diaspora Jewry.’
This
decision was upheld
in 2013 in Uzi Ornan v Ministry of the Interior. The Jewish
Nation State Law passed last summer makes it
explicit that Israel is the nation state of the Jews, all Jews, wherever they
live. That is why Netanyahu has described
himself as the ‘Prime Minister of the
Jewish people.’
On
10th March popular Israeli actress Rotem Sala asserted that “the
Arabs are also human beings’, in response to an accusation
from Culture Minister Miri Regev that the opposition in the current general
election wants to form a government with the support of the Arab parties. In
Israel such an accusation is almost like accusing someone of being a child
molester. Netanyahu immediately wrote
in response that ‘Israel is the nation-state of the Jewish nation – and it
alone’.
Strategic interest
Half
of the world’s Jews live outside Israel and are nationals of the country they
live in yet Israel claims that they are part of the same nation as its own
Jewish citizens. It is this claim, not what Ilhan Omar said, which lies behind
the belief that Jews have a dual loyalty to both Israel and the country they
live in.
Clearly
it is not possible to be a member of two nations simultaneously (although
legally one can be a dual national).
So
when Ilhan Omar accused members of the Senate of spending time defending a
foreign nation by attacking its own nationals’ right to free speech she is
correct.
There
is nothing whatsoever anti-Semitic in such an assertion. The reason isn’t so
much ‘the Benjamins’ i.e. money but because support for Israel is seen
as in the United States’s strategic interests.
Hence
why some of the most vociferous supporters of Israel are not Jewish but
fundamentalist Christians and many, such as Trump, are known for their use of anti-Semitic tropes.
Guilty of dishonesty
Ilhan
was attacking all those Senators, regardless of religion, who voted for a Bill
that prioritised the defence of America’s racist Rottweiler in the Middle East
over the democratic rights of Americans.
Those
who accuse Ilhan of ‘anti-Semitism’ are guilty of dishonesty. They are arguing
in bad faith.
It
is inherent to Zionism that the first loyalty of any Jew is to Israel because
their stay in the Diaspora is temporary. ‘The negation
of the diaspora’
is fundamental to Zionist ideology. The accursed Galut
(diaspora) needs to be wound up, although it is convenient having a large
community in the United States that can lobby on its behalf.
When you support AIPAC, you support the interests of a foreign state,
Israel
The wrong sort of Jews
This
is not an academic argument. Like most anti-Zionist Jews I receive my full
quota of abuse from Zionists. One of the most frequently used terms of abuse is
to call us a ‘traitor’ to which I respond by asking who it is that I am
disloyal to?
What
lies behind this accusation is the belief that a Jew’s first loyalty is to the
State of Israel not the country they live in.
That
was why the Israeli Ministries of Foreign Affairs and Absorption distributed
in 2013 a survey asking American Jews ‘where their allegiance would lie in
the case of a crisis between the two countries.’
Netanyahu
had the survey stopped in its tracks but what is interesting is that this
survey was ever thought of. It would have been interesting to see the results!
Phillip
Weiss cites
a number of Jewish writers such as Joe Klein who wrote
about the push to go to war in Iraq by the neocons:
The
fact that a great many Jewish neoconservatives – people like Joe Lieberman and
the crowd over at Commentary – plumped for this war, and now for an even more
foolish assault on Iran, raised the question of divided loyalties: using U.S.
military power, U.S. lives and money, to make the world safe for Israel.
When
you support AIPAC you support the interests of a foreign state, Israel. As the
former Israel’s Ambassador to the United States Michael Oren tweeted‘AIPAC is Israel’s national strategic asset.’ If anyone is questioning
American Jewish loyalty it isn’t Ilhan Omar it people like Israeli government
minister, Michael Oren.
Why is Watson so concerned
about ‘anti-Semitism’ when he supported Phil Woolas whose
election campaign tried to ‘make White
folks angry’?
Dear Tom,
I listened with rapt attention to
your conversation
with Lee on LBC. You said that you were determined to stop Labour ‘being stained by the stench of racism’
and that you would ‘not resile from
driving out anti-Semites from my party.’
You stated
that ‘one anti-Semite in the Labour Party
is one too many” and expressed your anger that Luciana
Berger was ‘bullied out of her own party
by racist thugs" I assume you were referring to the Jewish
Chair of Wavertree Labour PartyDr Alex Scott-Samuel?
A smug Tom Watson defends himself from a Labour member on LBC
You stated that this was Labour’s "worst
day of shame" in its 120 year history. I must confess that I recall a
few other days that were even more shameful than when Luciana Berger, fearful
that she was going to be deselected, cried ‘anti-Semitism’
and then jumped ship.
When Emily Thornberry refused to vote for 90 days detention without trial, Tom Watson accused her of being a 'traitor' - bullying women is second nature to him
I am referring for example to the (Kenya Asians) Commonwealth Immigration Actdecision of the Labour Government in 1968 to remove the right of Asian passport
holders to come to this country, despite the promises made to them in 1963 at
the time of Kenyan independence. The right of White settlers to enter the UK
was preserved. This was passed after a campaign by Duncan Sandys and Enoch Powell. So shocking was this act of naked racism that even Tories such
as Iain Macleod, Michael Heseltine and Ian Gilmour voted against it. If this
pandering to Powell and the National Front has escaped your mind then I refer
you to Mark Latimer’s article
in the New Statesman, When Labour
played the racist card.
There was however a time when genuine
anti-Semitism was rife in the Labour Party but this was amongst the Fabian Right.
Sidney Webb, later the Colonial Secretary Lord Passfield, observed
that ‘French, German, Russian Socialism
is Jew-ridden. We thank heaven, are free.’ His explanation being that ‘there is no money in it.’
What the Webbs said paled in
comparison to Clement Attlee who chaired a Cabinet Committee on Jewish
Refugees. Government policy was summed
up in a telegram to Lord Halifax on 8th January 1943 expressing
concern that Nazi policy might change ‘from
the policy of extermination to extrusion.’ Eleven days later Attlee told
the Commons that there could be no relaxation in the immigration rules and that
‘efforts to save the Jews cannot be
simply British efforts.’ [Auschwitz and the Allies (pp.
110-11) Martin Gilbert]. What he meant was that no effort would be made.
If you really think that the whining
plaints of ‘anti-Semitism’ by Blairite
Berger was Labour’s worst ever day of shame then it is clear that your
resignation is long overdue. The Labour Party has very many things to be
ashamed of but the present synthetic ‘anti-Semitism’ is not one of
them.
Leaving aside Labour’s shameful
record in respect of Jewish refugees from Nazism there is the Attlee
government’s super-exploitation of the African colonies and Malaya. There is
the decision of Tony Blair to go to war in Iraq in 2003 at the expense of a
million Iraqi lives.
If racism is your primary concern then
why do have nothing to say about Islamapobia or racism against Black people?
How do you explain your decision to abstain on Theresa May’s 2014 Immigration
Act which introduced the hostile environment policy?When an opposition abstains this means it
supports the government. There were just 6 Labour MPs who voted
against this Act and you were not amongst them. Why does the Windrush
scandal not trouble you?
Tom Watson (& Ruth Smeeth) giving succour and comfort to the racists of the Israeli Labor Party
In your exchange
with Lee you purported not to understand the connection between the fake
‘anti-Semitism’ narrative and support for the Palestinians. I am happy to
explain. Luciana Berger was Director for 3 years of
Labour Friends of Israel. You were Vice-President
of Trade Union Friends of Israel. If you are having to defend the abominations
of the Israeli state, a state that its own Prime Minister says
is a state only of its Jewish citizens, then it is easier to accuse its critics
of ‘anti-Semitism’ than to have to justify Israel's behaviour.
Last
Sunday, Israel’s Ha’aretz publishedthe testimonies ofPalestinian
children who have been gaoled, 'Endless
Trip to Hell'. What happens to Palestinian
children never happens to Jewish children. This is a state of affairs usually
described as Apartheid. However your voice has never been heard because you
spend your time as an apologist for Israel’s Occupation.
Khalil Zaakiq. Meged Gozani
Khalil Zaakiq a
13 year old boy, described his ordeal.
“Around 2 A.M. someone
knocked on the door. I woke up and saw a lot of soldiers in the house. … The
commander called Uday, my big brother, told him to get dressed and informed him
that he was under arrest. It was the third time they arrested him. My father
was also once under arrest. Suddenly they told me to put my shoes on too and go
with them.
“They
took us out of the house and tied our hands and covered our eyes. We went like
that on foot to the base in Karmei Tzur. There they sat me on the floor with
hands tied and eyes covered for around three hours. At about 5 A.M., they moved
us to Etzion. On the way there in the jeep they hit us, they slapped me. In
Etzion, I was sent to be checked by a doctor. He asked if I had been beaten and
I said yes. He didn’t do anything, only checked my blood pressure and said I
could stand up to an interrogation.
“My
interrogation started at 8 A.M.. They asked me to tell them which children
throw stones. I said I didn’t know, so the interrogator gave me a slap. The
interrogation went on for four hours. Afterward, they put me into a dark room
for 10 minutes and then took me back to the interrogation room… After an hour,
Uday and I were moved to Ofer Prison. I didn’t sign a confession, neither about
myself nor about others.
“I
got out after nine days, because I wasn’t guilty of anything…. My little
brother, who is 10, has been really afraid ever since. Whenever someone knocks
at the door, he wets his pants.”
Palestinian children detained by Israel - stripped and in the sun - this is what Watson and his LFI friends support
Israel’s abuse of Palestinian children was debated
in Parliament in January 2016. Introduced by Sarah Champion it was based on a
UNICEF Report based on 400 testimonies which found that the ill-treatment of Palestinian
children by the Israeli military was ‘widespread,
systematic and institutionalized’.
None of this stopped two Labour MPs, Louise Ellman and Ian Austin, repeatedly
interrupting other MPs in order to defend Israel’s military. This is why, when
you pretend not to understand the connection between anti-Semitism and Palestine
it’s difficult to believe you.
I also fail to understand why, when John
McDonnell called
on you to return half a million pounds from Max Mosley (son of Oswald), a
disgraced tycoon and a racist, who called for immigrants to be offered “financial inducements to go home”. you did
not return the money?
Some of the donations to Tom Watson - most of them were from Zionists
Speaking of donations you have
received, in the past 3 years, a total of £50,000 from Sir Trevor Chinn, a
prominent Zionist and owner of Kwik Fit
and £30,000 from Sir
David Garrard, a supporter of Labour Friends of Israel and now TIG as well as £4,500 direct from LFI.
Yvonne Davies (left) the woman that Tom Watson bullied
On 13th September
2018, Skwawkbox
published a story about Sandwell councillor Yvonne Davies whom you bullied
because she didn’t want to continue St George’s Day parades that were being
used by the BNP. Yvonne proposed a family-friendly ‘party in the park’ event instead but you went to the newspapers who
quoted you as explaining what had happened was just “high spirits.” Yvonne said that your harassment got worse over time
and that you were behind attempts to get her deselected as a Sandwell councilor
forcing her to move outside your constituency to escape your bullying. How do
you reconcile your friendliness to the BNP with your opposition to
anti-Semitism?
On 26th February,
the Board of Deputies, a Zionist group, complained that Chris Williamson had
booked a room in Parliament for a Jewish Voice for Labour screening of Jackie
Walker’s WitchHunt, accusing
Williamson of “trolling the Jewish
community” even though Jackie is Jewish and JVL are a Jewish group. You reported
this to the Chief Whip and General Secretary. Why?
On 27th February
you demanded that Chris Williamson be suspended for claiming that the Labour
Party had been 'too apologetic' over false
claims of antisemitism. You said “If it
was in my gift I would have removed the whip” from Chris Williamson. Nothing
Chris said was anti-Semitic and you know it. Why did you try to suppress this film?
On 11th March,
the Spectator revealed
that your new 'Future Britain Group'
had registered its website on 18th February, the very same day The
Independent Group (TIG) was launched. Was this a coincidence or more evidence
that you are coordinating with TIG?
Other relevant facts
include the fact that:
ØIn
2003, you voted
in favour of going to war with Iraq and you have consistently voted against
an investigation into the war.
ØIn
2004, despite your apparent concern with racism, you were responsible
for putting out a nakedly racist leaflet that said "Labour is on your side – the Lib Dems are on the side of failed
asylum seekers"
ØIn
2009 it was revealed that you had claimed
the maximum £4,800 allowance for food in a single year and that between 2005
and 2009, you and Iain Wright claimed over £100,000 for a central London flat you
both shared.
ØIn
Oct 2016 you abstained from voting on a Labour Party motion calling for the UK
to withdraw support from the Saudi Arabian-led intervention in Yemen. Why?
Leon Brittan, Anti-Semitism and
allegations of Child Abuse
In October 2012 you made
allegations about a paedophile network that had been protected by their Parliamentary
connections involving a close aide to a former Prime Minister. Although you refused
to mention any names publicly there was one exception to this, Leon Brittan.Why?
As you know Brittan
was continually
dogged throughout his career by ‘an undercurrent of anti-Semitism.’ This was summed up by Harold
MacMillan who described Margaret Thatcher’s cabinet, as being ‘more Old Estonian than Old Etonian.’ Eventually you were forced to apologise
for your unsubstantiated allegations and description of Brittan as ‘evil’. What explanation is there, other
than the fact that he was Jewish, for your attacks on Brittan?
Phil Woolas was a Labour MP and
Immigration Minister who was infamous for being an opportunist with no fixed
principles. He met his comeuppance after the 2010 election, which he won by 103
votes, for making false allegations that his Lib-Dem opponent supported Islamic
terrorism. After
the election Elwyn Watkins complained
of Woolas’s lies and was quoted as saying:
"Woolas is trying to portray this as me being
antisemitic. I'm not antisemitic at all. He has taken something and tried to
make it something it's not.’
The BBC reported
that a special election
court found in November that Woolas had knowingly lied about his Liberal
Democrat rival, Elwyn Watkins in the weeks running up to the General Election.
Woolas’s leaflets accused Watkins of pandering to Muslim militants. In an email disclosed
during the hearing, Woolas' agent, Joe Fitzpatrick wrote: "If we don't get the white
folk angry, he's gone."
The court found
that Woolas’s chosen method for achieving this was to suggest there were Muslim
extremists who advocated violence against Woolas and that Watkins was
attempting to seek their support.
In November 2008 Woolas attacked
lawyers and charities working on behalf of asylum seekers, accusing them "playing the system" by taking
legal action. You might have expected Tom Watson to have been the first to call
for the expulsion of this racist shit. Not a bit of it.
‘I’ve lost sleep
thinking about poor old Phil Woolas and his leaflets.’ He felt ‘like a piano has been dropped on my head. It
is the most brutal truth of all – the realisation that you are on your own in
politics. When the shit storm hits, you have no allies. Being a member of
Parliament is a lonely, solitary, dangerous life….Truth and Lies. They said Phil lied on a leaflet. He lost
his job because of it.
It’s hard to believe
that this is the same Tom Watson who won’t rest until the last anti-Semite is
driven out of the Labour Party! There is only one explanation. Tom Watson is
motivated, not by anti-Semitism but a love for Israeli Apartheid!
Imagine interviewing a
spokesman for ISIS after the Paris massacres or Oswald Moseley after the
capture of Belsen - BBC Heads Should Roll
It seems that the BBC’s idea of
Balance is to give equal weight to the Right and the Far-Right. How else to
explain the BBC’s decision to interview, on the day of the New Zealand massacre
of 50 Muslim worshippers, a spokesman for the fascist Generation Identity,
Benjamin Jones?
It was akin to asking ISIS for their
views on the Bataclan
massacre in Paris or the Manchester
bombing. There was no possible justification for presenter Richard Watson interrupting
a report on the massacre by White Supremacist Brenton Tarrant to interview Jones.
Jones whole purpose in the interview
was to provide a justification for what happened, to explain the background
from the point of white supremacists whilst distancing himself from the
massacre itself. What was worse was that far from challenging Jones, Watson
allowed him to develop and elaborate his points. Watson opened by explaining
that
Richard Watson - BBC Interviewer Completely Folded when attempting to challenge Benjamin Jones
‘His (Brenton Tarrant) document is titled The Great Replacement, a reference
to European culture being subsumed by immigration. That’s precisely the same
phrase used by European group called Generation Identity which campaigns
against immigration and Islam. Generation Identity uses similar arguments to
those found in the New Zealand document. I spoke to its UK leader, Benjamin
Jones [BJ], today.
Firstly BJ was allowed to make the unsubstantiated assertion that they
are ‘fundamentally opposed’ to the
American alt-Right when in fact there is no substantial difference.Both are ethno nationalist groups.
BJ:Generation Identity is fundamentally opposed to what we call alt-Right
tendencies and the vast majority of what we find in this manifesto we classify
as alt-Right. It’s simple as that.
Benjamin Jones
Then BJ was given the opportunity of
condemning the violence, which of course he did. Watson, in typical
Establishment-speak talked of ‘extreme
and offensive’ views. It is irrelevant whether they are extreme or
offensive, what matters is their content. There is nothing wrong in being ‘extreme’ or indeed offensive. It depends on whom you are being offensive to. The views
espoused were overtly racist, a word
that Watson never once used.
Jones was allowed to get away with
talk of ‘the typical Muslim’. Just
imagine if he had said ‘the typical Jew’.
There would have been uproar because there is no more a typical Muslim than
a typical Jew or a typical Christian but Watson as with the BBC in general, is
completely incapable of challenging racism since the BBC continually gives
racists like UKIP a platform.
The BBC's Reporters are so Useless that they don't mention that Replacement is nothing but Refugees fleeing our Violence
Jones was then allowed, twice, to
explain that this violence was ‘inevitable’
because you could not have different peoples mixing. It as if BBC reporters have
learnt nothing over the past 30 years. This was the argument used repeatedly
against Jewish and indeed any form of immigration. It was a lie then and it is
a lie now. But the pathetic Watson could only ask Jones to elaborate.
Jones spoke about ‘radically different points of view’of
Muslimswithout ever being challenged
to explain this nonsense. Indeed at no point did Watson, even once challenge
any of the arguments or tropes of Jones. One can only presume that the reason
for that is because the BBC operates within the same right-wing consensus of
Generation Identity.That is why Nigel
Farage is such a regular guest on Question Time.True it is just a bit more civilised but
there is no fundamental disagreement. The interview continued:
RW:So you absolutely condemn
his use of violence?
BJ:We condemn the use of violence in all circumstances and contexts.
RW:But Generation Identity
does have very extreme and offensive views especially about Muslims.
BJ:As far as the typical Muslim is concerned their way of life is
completely incompatible with the lifestyle of the average person in this
country lives. I see instances such as this as inevitable if we continue to put
different peoples with different perspectives, radically different points of
view in terms of how we conduct our lives as human beings together and I think that
will come from extremists across the spectrum which is why it is so important
that we continue to advocate the advantages of a homogenous society.
Instead of challenging any
of the above Watson throws a softball question.
RW:You just said that violence
of this kind is inevitable if this kind of immigration continues. That’s a very
serious thing to say.
BJ:It’s something that all sorts of people have been saying for
many decades. This goes all the way back to Enoch Powell.(inaudible) We don’t
want it to happen. But we are fundamentally bringing people from parts of the
world who have a radically different perspective of how to conduct their lives
as human beings to the typical Westerner. That is inevitably going to lead to
conflict.’
Tommy Robinson's supporters outside the Old Bailey last year
The first thing a Labour Government should
do is to remove the Establishment’s control of the BBC. We need an exodus of
the Tory boys and girls – Laura Kuensberg, Andrew Neil and Andrew Marr for starters.
When was the last time the BBC employed a socialist or radical political
commentator?
Although her usual timid and
hesitant self, Chakrabartiat least raised the question on
the Andrew Marr show.Perhaps she should
find the same fire in her belly that she displayed when arguing for Ken
Livingstone’s expulsion. See
