Showing posts with label UNICEF. Show all posts
Showing posts with label UNICEF. Show all posts

23 February 2021

Open Letter to the Vice-Chancellor of Bristol University, Professor Hugh Brady - It’s Your Job To Defend Academic Freedom not Appease Racists

David Miller is not the first Bristol University lecturer to have been targeted by the Zionists – the last time it was a Jewish Professor, Rachel Gould


Board of Deputies Member Robert Festenstein appears in a Tommy Robinson propaganda Video

Below is a letter that I have written to Bristol University’s Vice-Chancellor, Hugh Brady, with copies to other senior administrators.  Please consider writing yourself because you can be sure that if there is one thing that the Zionists are good at it is getting a letter campaign together.

Also if you are Jewish please sign this letter and everyone please sign this petition. At the moment the Zionists have more than twice as many signatories.

Professor Hugh Brady,

Vice-Chancellor,

The University of Bristol,

Beacon House,

Queens Road

Bristol BS8 1QU

 

Email to:          vc-epa@bristol.ac.uk 

Dear Professor Brady,

For the past 2 years Professor David Miller has been subjected to a relentless campaign of vilification by Zionist groups, both on and off campus. In the past week, following his speech at a conference of the Labour Campaign for Free Speech, these attacks have reached a crescendo.

The mob attack on David has been led by those well known anti-racist papers, the Daily Mail and the Jewish Chronicle.

A whole gaggle of Zionist groups have joined in the hue and cry including the Board of Deputies, whose Constitution mandates it to ‘Take such appropriate action as lies within its power to advance Israel's security, welfare and standing.’

Another group in hot pursuit of David is the far-Right Islamaphobic Campaign Against Anti-Semitism.

Such is the Board of Deputies’s devotion to Israel that it even justified Israel’s use of snipers against unarmed Palestinian demonstrators killing 300 people including 50 children as well as a number of medics.

What was David Miller’s ‘crime’? He called for an end to Zionism. As someone who is Jewish I join him in this call, as do many Jews. There is nothing anti-Semitic in such a call.

Zionism is a political not an ethnic or religious creed. Would it seriously be suggested that someone who calls for an end to socialism, fascism or capitalism be dismissed?

David also pointed out that Jewish student societies are in reality Zionist societies. The Union of Jewish Students, which is the umbrella organisation for all 67 J-Socs in Britain, receives funding from the Israeli Embassy, as Al Jazeera’s The Lobby revealed.

UJS is also affiliated to the World Zionist Organisation, which according to Ha'aretz has a ‘land theft division’. The people whose land it steals are Palestinians.

One of UJS’s ‘core values’ is “engagement with Israel’, which they ‘passionately and proudly’ boast of. Among its Objects is “inspiring students to making an enduring commitment” to Israel.’

No anti-Zionist or anti-racist Jewish student would go within a mile of UJS or their affiliated societies.

In the light of the vicious attacks on David Miller by both the media and pro-Israel groups, the least he is entitled to expect is that Bristol University’s will stand by him and defend free speech.

Yet what has been the response of Bristol’s Administration to date? Have you defended David Miller’s right to speak out on Zionism and Israel without intimidation?  No. Instead you have offered to meet David’s student protagonists to discuss the ‘upset’ to them.

Bristol is not located in Israel where people have to be careful what they say.  A state where Palestinian poet Dareen Tatour was gaoled for writing a poem calling for resistance. 

If, 40 years ago, a Bristol University lecturer had called for an end to Apartheid in South Africa and had condemned the attacks on anti-Apartheid activists by supporters of Apartheid on campus, would you have rushed to reassure the racists of your support? That is exactly what you have done to date.

On 12 January 2021 Israel’s most respected human rights organisation B’Tselem, declared that Israel was ‘A regime of Jewish supremacy from the Jordan River to the Mediterranean Sea’ The refusal of Israel to vaccinate 5 million Palestinians whilst inoculating Jewish settlers living in their midst should settle this debate.

As Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu stated:

“Israel is not a state of all its citizens. According to the basic nationality law we passed, Israel is the nation state of the Jewish people – and only it.

Sir Stephen Sedley, a former Lord Justice of Appeal, who is himself Jewish, explained that s.43 of the 1986 Education Act places a duty on Bristol to ‘take such steps as are reasonably practicable to ensure that freedom of speech within the law is secured for members, students and employees.’ 

I was one of the organisers of the Free Speech conference at which David Miller spoke. Speaking alongside him was noted American intellectual Norman Finkelstein and Ronnie Kasrils, a Minister in Nelson Mandela’s government. Both of them are Jewish.

Trump exhibits his signing of an Executive Order enabling use of the IHRA in Title VI cases - anti-Semites have no objection to the IHRA since it's not about anti-Semitism

The reason why the Board of Deputies and the Campaign Against Anti-Semitism have felt emboldened to call for the sacking of academics is because you recently adopted the IHRA misdefinition of anti-Semitism. As Stephen Sedley observed, the IHRA isn’t even a definition, being open ended. Why wasn’t the OED definition of anti-Semitism: ‘hostility to or prejudice against Jews.’ sufficient? 

The IHRA contains 11 illustrations of ‘anti-Semitism’, 7 of which are about Israel. Israel is not a Jew and anti-Semitism is not anti-Zionism. Your decision to bow to Zionist pressure previously has led directly to the current attacks on David Miller.

Islamaphobia and Zionism

The organisations  which have been fronting the current attack on David Miller have particularly objected to his linking of Zionist organisations and Islamaphobia. Israel itself is vehemently anti- Muslim. Israel’s liberal Ha'aretz, wrote about how:

‘The rising tide of Islamophobia across the world… provides a backdrop for the hatred of Arabs in present-day Israel. Earlier this month, Channel 8 broadcast the first episode of Ron Cahlili’s documentary series, “Hate,” about the growing loathing for Arabs in Israel. Cahlili shows how the call “Death to the Arabs” moved from the margins to become a ubiquitous ideology that has infiltrated the Israeli mainstream.

Not only have the organisations calling for Professor Miller to be sacked covered for Israel’s Islamaphobia (a plurality of Israeli Jews support the physical expulsion of Israeli Palestinians) but one of the most prominent, the CAA has a long record of inciting racial hatred of Muslims.

In April 2016 the CAA produced a Report British Muslims and Anti-Semitism. Its Introduction spoke of the

‘growing antisemitism amongst British Muslims. On every single count, British Muslims were more likely by far than the general British population to hold deeply antisemitic views. It is clear that many British Muslims reserve a special hatred for British Jews, rating Jews much less favourably than people of other religions or no religion... It has long been suspected that sections of the British Muslim population harboured hatred towards British Jews... the prejudice is horrifyingly widespread.’

On the cover of the Report was a picture of a Black person holding a ‘Hitler was right’ poster. Not content with portraying Muslims as genocidal anti-Semites the CAA also included a profile of a typical Muslim male accompanied by the caption ‘Sympathetic to terrorism, extremism and violence.’ If ‘Jew’ had been substituted for ‘Muslim’ then who could have doubted that this image was anti-Semitic ?

4 years ago another Bristol University academic, Rachel Gould, who was herself Jewish, was subject to a similar campaign to that against David Miller. Dr Gould’s offence had been to write an article ‘Beyond Anti-Semitism’ which described how the memory of the holocaust was being used to deflect criticism of Israel’s racist policies.

The CAA wrote to you demanding that Dr Gould ‘should be required… to publicly retract her article.’ If however she refused to do so then ‘she should be dismissed, and her dismissal should be made public so as to clearly signal the University of Bristol’s values.’ These are the people you are currently appeasing.

Kenneth Stern, an American academic who was the main author of the IHRA, declared in testimony to the US Congress that the CAA’s behaviour was ‘egregious’ and that ‘the exercise itself was chilling and McCarthy-like.’ Instead of sending the CAA away with a flea in their ear Bristol University then conducted an inquiry into this bogus complaint putting Dr Gould under enormous stress. It is little wonder that she departed for Birmingham University soon after.

None of this stopped Sir Eric Pickles, a Cabinet member from describing Gould’s article as ‘one of the worst cases of Holocaust denial”.  A claim Bristol Live called ‘ridiculous and inflammatory.’

The CAA has waged similar campaigns against a host of academics, most of them Jewish. Richard Falk, an American emeritus professor at Princeton University and UN Special Rapporteur for the Palestinian territories was also subject to the CAA’s attentions. The CAA boasted that

‘following intervention by Campaign Against Antisemitism, the university (Middlesex) has now decided to cancel the event.’ This development comes hours after the University of East London took action to stop another event at which Falk was due to speak.’



Emeritus Professor Moshe Machover of King’s College was also a victim of the CAA’s McCarthyisn. Machover was falsely accused of having ‘accused Jewish students of being under the control of the Israeli embassy’. A similar accusation to that against David Miller.

The CAA’s letter to to Queen Mary College could have been written by Joe McCarthy. They wrote

‘to ascertain why Professor Machover was allowed to speak and lodge a complaint, and have additionally written to King’s College London and the London School of Economics to ascertain his employment status, and request that disciplinary proceedings be instigated.’

The chutzpah (impudence) of an external organisation demanding to know why a distinguished professor was allowed to speak at a university is illustrative of the contempt of Zionist organisations for free speech. You Professor Grady have only encouraged them.

On no occasion have the gaggle of Zionist organisations currently targeting David Miller dissociated themselves from the CAA’s tactics.

Marie van der Zyl, President of the Board of Deputies, in her letter to Bristol University said of Professor Miller that his ‘rants would not look out of place on the pages of Der Sturmer’, a Nazi tabloid.’

Anyone with any acquaintance with Julius Streicher’s rabidly anti-Semitic pornographic paper would know what a malicious smear this is. Yet instead of terminating the correspondence Bristol University has encouraged this type of rancid complaint, stating that:

“We have received a significant number of calls for Professor David Miller to be dismissed.

“UK law requires that we, like all employers, act in accordance with our internal procedures and the ACAS code of conduct.’

UK employment law does not oblige any employer, least of all a university, to entertain malicious complaints about their employees. This statement is disingenuous.

Mark Gardener of the CST, a Zionist organisation with links to Israel’s Mossad, which collects information on Jewish anti-Zionists (they sent me a file of over 300 pages as a result of a Subject Access Request) accused Professor Miller of a ‘vile slur’ for accusing Zionist organisations of Islamaphobia. Yet this isn’t the first time that the CST has been accused of Islamaphobia.

Another of the organisations accused of Islamaphobia is the Jewish National Fund. The JNF, which owns and controls 93% of Israeli land, refuses to rent or lease this land to non-Jews. It operates solely for the benefit of the ‘Jewish people’. Gideon Levy of Ha'aretz described how Avraham Duvdevani  Chair of the JNF, prevented a Jew having to sell land to an Arab by getting the JNF to buy the land. Thus keeping it for the Jewish people. The CST considers this policy of ‘Jewish land’ perfectly acceptable.

The Board of Deputies which is leading the attack on Miller is riddled with Islamaphobia and anti-Arab racists. Roslyn Pine, a deputy for Finchley United Synagogue, shared tweets describing Muslims as “the vilest of animals” calling Arabs “so evil”. Although she was suspended for 6 years by the Board she was later quietly readmitted.

The Jewish Chronicle described how Robert Festenstein appeared alongside Tommy Robinson ‘in a politically motivated video made for a right-wing media website.’ Festenstein was introduced by Robinson as ‘a legal adviser’. The Board didn’t even bother to call Festenstein, the Deputy for Prestwich synagogue, to account because it knew that once it set out on this road it would have few members left.

None of this should be of any surprise. The Constitution of the Board mandates it to‘Take such appropriate action as lies within its power to advance Israel's security, welfare and standing.’ Not once has it condemned Israeli war crimes such as the practice of imprisoning Palestinian children as young as 12 or demolishing Palestinian homes. Even Tory Minister James Cleverly condemned the demolition of Humsa Al-Baqai’a, a village which housed 73 people, including 41 children, who are now homeless.

Using the English Language Correctly

I am sure you will be aware, as a senior academic, of how important it is to use the English language correctly. When someone is accused of anti-Semitism then this is a term that should be used accurately and not used to defend the abuse of Palestinian human rights. Anti-Semitism is about hatred, hostility and discrimination against Jews as Jews not hatred or opposition to Zionism.

When Zionist students at Bristol University say they feel ‘unsafe’ because of a speech made by Professor Miller at a conference that none of them even attended, what they are doing is using the English language as a weapon of deceit. Perhaps these snowflakes should spend a few days on the West Bank where they might come to appreciate exactly what the word ‘unsafe’ really means.  Since the Administration of Bristol University is too timid to enlighten them perhaps I might give you an indication of what this word means:

·                unsafe is not knowing when your house is going to be bulldozed

·                unsafe is not knowing if your child will return from the shops because he/she may become a victim of an Israeli sniper

·                unsafe is not knowing if you are going to be arrested everyday for just being of a different ethnicity

·                unsafe is not knowing if you'll have any water today because the tank may get riddled with bullets

·                unsafe is when you have to pay a $20,000 fine for a bulldozer that has destroyed your village. This practice originated with the Nazis. Jews who were deported to Auschwitz had to pay the cost of the trains that took them to their deaths.

·         unsafe is when in order to get to your class at Bir Zeit university you have to negotiate army checkpoints at any of which you could be harassed and delayed.

·         unsafe is not knowing what has happened to your 12 year old child after he had been arrested in the early hours of the morning, blindfolded with painful plastic handcuffs put on him, deprived of food and water for hours and then subject to violence by armed soldiers.

·         Unsafe is not knowing whether your girl, who has been taken by the Israeli military will be one of those 40% of girls subject to sexual abuse.

An Israeli flag flies along with Confederate flags amid a sea of neo-Nazi proud boys. Most fascist groups today see Israel as a model Islamaphobic state

Members of Bristol J-Soc don’t know the meaning of the word ‘unsafe’ and neither it would appear do you. Below is the description of one such arrest by Amnesty International (a group described by Donald Trump as ‘anti-Semitic’).

At about 2am on 24 October, a dozen Israeli police, armed with machine guns, came to arrest Bakr Sa'id, a 15 year old boy, at his home in Kufar Kana. Four armed police officers went to where Bakr Sa'id was sleeping and arrested the boy. Bakr Sa'id was reportedly interrogated for several hours in the early morning by three interrogators in civilian clothes who shouted and threatened him. Later in the day he was brought to court, but his father was not allowed to speak to him. Another detainee in court said he saw a police officer slap Bakr Sa'id in the face.

A Report for UNICEF on the treatment of Palestinian Children in Israeli Military Detention describes a standard interrogation of children, who are not allowed access to lawyers or their parents.

The interrogation mixes intimidation, threats and physical violence, with the clear purpose of forcing the child to confess. Children are restrained during the interrogation, in some cases to the chair they are sitting on. This sometimes continues for extended periods of time, resulting in pain to their hands, back and legs. Children have been threatened with death, physical violence, solitary confinement and sexual assault, against themselves or a family member.

Of course such treatment would not be meted out to Jewish children. This is why Israel is an Apartheid police state for Palestinians.

Your students’ description of themselves as ‘unsafe’ should be treated with contempt. The only question is whether you have the honesty and integrity to call out these false accusations against Professor Miller for the lies that they are. Academic freedom is something that people have given their lives for in other countries. Do you have the courage to stand up to these orchestrated smears against a member of staff or are you going to appease these apologists for Israeli war crimes?

Yours sincerely,

Tony Greenstein

cc.                     

Prof Sarah Purdy,    Pro Vice Chancellor Student Experience, pvc-studentexperience@bristol.ac.uk        

Prof. Tansy Jessop, pvc-education@bristol.ac.uk, Pro Vice Chancellor Student Education

Mr Jack Boyer, Chair, Board of Trustees, governance@bristol.ac.uk

Dr Moira Hamlin, Vice-Chair, Board of Trustees, governance@bristol.ac.uk

Judith Squires, Provost,                                      provost@bristol.ac.uk

Jane Bridgwater, Director of Legal Services     jane.bridgwater@bristol.ac.uk

Prof. Simon Tormey, Dean, Faculty of Social Sciences and Law wp19124@bristol.ac.uk


18 October 2019

Rejoice, Rejoice, The Witch is Gone!! - Louise Ellman, Racist MP for Liverpool Riverside Finally Gets the Hint


Parachuted in by Blair, Louise Ellman, a dedicated supporter of Israeli child abuse finally gets the message that she isn’t wanted

Speaking to the Jewish Chronicle  after finally resigning from the Labour Party, Louise Ellman said it "sounded very credible" that Jeremy Corbyn had once dubbed her "the Honourable Member for Tel Aviv".
Jewish Chronicle article on my attack on Ellman 

I don’t know whether Jeremy Corbyn has ever called her the Member for Tel Aviv but there is certainly nothing honourable about this wretch. As the Jewish Chronicle’s Daniel Sugarman noted:
Mr Greenstein was expelled from Labour in February over abusive behaviour that included writing blog posts about veteran Jewish Labour MP Louise Ellman as the MP for “Tel Aviv South” and a “racist supporter of the child abuse of Palestinian children”.
When Apartheid in South Africa existed we used to call the Tory MP for Luton North, John Carlisle, a supporter of the Apartheid regime who died earlier this year, ‘the member for Bloemfontein West’. He was also called the MP for Johanneburg! 
These are some of the techniques used on children and adults - they are legal in Israel and the Dame approves
I doubt that that was racist.  So why should it be racist or anti-Semitic to describe Louise Ellman as the MP for Tel Aviv?
Louise Ellman is however a despicable supporter of Israel’s abuse of Palestinian children.
On 6th January 2016 there was a Parliamentary Debate ‘Child Prisoners and Detainees: Occupied Palestinian Territories’
It was introduced by Sarah Champion MP who cited a report from British lawyers in June 2012 concerning Palestinian children held in Israeli military custody. Facilitated and funded by the Foreign and Commonwealth Office the Report found that Israel was in breach of six of its legal obligations under the UN convention on the rights of the child and two obligations under the fourth Geneva convention.
Ellman consistently defended Israel's treatment of Palestinian children, including torture
The report concluded that if the allegations of abuse were true, Israel would also be in breach of the absolute prohibition against cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment. In other words Israel tortures children and Ellman defends it. Indeed Israel barely denies it since it is legal under Israeli law.
Eight months after the UK report was published, UNICEF released its own assessment of the military detention system for children. Based on over 400 sworn affidavits from children as young as 12 who were detained by military courts, UNICEF concluded that,
One of the reasons for my expulsion was calling Dame Ellman a supporter of Israeli child abuse
“the ill-treatment of children who come in contact with the military detention system appears to be widespread, systematic and institutionalized throughout the process, from the moment of arrest until the child’s prosecution and eventual conviction and sentencing”.
None of this stopped Dame Ellman intervening 3 times during the debate to defend the Israeli military’s treatment of children:
‘does she accept that the context in which these situations occur is an organised campaign conducted by the Palestinian authorities of incitement, to try to provoke young Palestinians to carry out acts of violence towards other civilians, some of which result in death, including the death of young children?’
The idea that Palestinian children have to be incited to attack the military occupation, because otherwise they would fall in love with soldiers who tear gas them is one of Ellman’s pet themes.
Ms Champion responded that:
‘this debate is about the different treatment of Palestinian and Israeli children, and the breach of human rights and international law.’
The late Jo Cox MP also intervened:
‘evidence from Military Court Watch suggests that 65% of children continue to report being arrested at night in what are described as terrifying raids by the military.’
This did not deter Ellman who intervened again:
‘Does my hon. Friend really believe that the solution to this horrendous conflict between two peoples—the Israeli and the Palestinian people—can be found by encouraging individual child Palestinians to commit acts of violence against other human beings?’
And then this despicable MP intervened a 3rd time:
‘I note my hon. Friend’s comments that a child should not be detained, and I assume that she means in any circumstances. Suppose a child was involved in an act of violence that resulted in the deaths of other human beings. That is what has happened with young Palestinians throwing stones—people have been killed. In those circumstances, surely she thinks that there should be detention.’
Military arrests of children of which there are hundreds each year are a method of coercing and intimidating Palestinian communities.
Two years later, on 7th February 2018, there was another debate on Palestinian Children and Israeli Military Detention. Ellman made a speech supporting the Israeli military. She spoke of
‘the Palestinian Authority’s incitement of young people to hate and kill, as is happening on the west bank today. Such incitement is specifically in breach of the Geneva conventions.’
In fact the Palestinian Authority is a Quisling Authority which works with the Israeli military to prevent acts of resistance. Ellman went on:
‘We must remember that 75% of the offences committed by Palestinian minors are violent crimes, including murder, attempted murder, shooting, making and throwing Molotov cocktails, and attacking soldiers. Thirty per cent. of assailants in the terror attacks of 2016 were under 18 years old. The youngest was 11. For example, in June 2016, 13-year-old Hallel Ariel was stabbed to death by Nasser Tarayrah, a 17-year-old Palestinian, who climbed into her home and stabbed her repeatedly in a frenzied attack in front of her younger siblings.’
Ellman was referring to the death of an Israeli settler child. She ‘forgot’ to mention the 32 Palestinian children killed in 2016.  A further 14 were killed in 2017 and in 2018 56 were killed, the highest for four years. However as these were Palestinian children who had died they were of no account to this racist.
Ellman did however mention the death of one settler baby ‘Yehuda Haim Shoham, aged five months.’ Jewish children are mentioned by name.  Palestinian children aren’t mentioned at all. 
The reason Ellman has been forced to resign is not that she is Jewish.  Some of her major critics in Liverpool Riverside CLP have been Jewish.  It’s because she is a racist and a Zionist. See The Riverside scandal: Louise Ellman and the war on Riverside Labour Party
It is difficult for the yellow press and the BBC to get their heads round that Ellman is hated because of who she is not because she is Jewish..
The BBC tonight carried another lying report about Ellman’s resignation.  Once again it carried nothing from her critics. No doubt the BBC will claim that this like all other reports are within BBC Guidelines.
It is a great pity that Jeremy Corbyn thanked Ellman for her services to the Labour Party, since no one can remember any. Given she blamed Corbyn for her resignation it is a pity he even mentioned this execrable woman. The only service she has done the Labour Party is her resignation from it.
Tony Greenstein