Jon Lansman stages a Coup D’état in Momentum as the National Committee is cancelled by the Steering Committee

The  Long Awaited Founding Conference of Momentum Will Be a Virtual Conference!

Jon Lansman, Momentum's founder is determined not to share power with the membership

Matt Wracks Speech on Momentum at the LRC Conference from Percivale Productions on Vimeo.

In his farewell speech to the House of Commons Tony Benn repeated one of his most famous sayings concerning democracy and accountability.  It is particularly relevant at the present time given Jon Lansman’s coup against Momentum’s membership.

‘In the course of my life I have developed five little democratic questions. If one meets a powerful person--Adolf Hitler, Joe Stalin or Bill Gates--ask them five questions: “What power have you got? Where did you get it from? In whose interests do you exercise it? To whom are you accountable? And how can we get rid of you?” If you cannot get rid of the people who govern you, you do not live in a democratic system.’ 

These are the questions we should be asking of Jon Lansman and those on the Steering Committee who voted with him –does your power derive, to whom are you accountable and most importantly how do Momentum members rid themselves of your misleadership?

Jackie Walker - removed as Vice-Chair of Momentum by Jon Lansman and friends despite the overwhelming opposition of Momentum members and branches

On the evening of October 27, Jon Lansman, the sole director of ‘Jeremy for Labour’ company (renamed from Momentum Campaign Ltd in the summer), called an emergency meeting of the Momentum Steering Committee for the evening of October 28 – i.e., with 19 hours’ notice. Some members, such as Matt Wrack and Jackie Walker, were not able to attend at such short notice.  The meeting decided, by six votes to three, to cancel the November 5 meeting of the National Committee which was scheduled to take decisions on the organisation of Momentum’s founding conference in February 2017.   

It was the February National Committee meeting which elected the Steering Committee for the following six months, i.e. up to August.  Therefore what has happened is that Momentum’s Steering Committee, a lower body, has just voted to disallow the higher body from meeting!  Clearly constitutional theory is not Lansman’s forte!   

It also decided that the first Momentum conference should be in the ethernet, a virtual reality conference.  It would have no physical manifestation.  There would be no meeting hall, no delegates, no debates, just an atomised membership who  would vote on the different proposals put before them.  And who would decide the structures that allow such a vote?  Well you guessed it.  The same Jon Lansman and his coterie who have decided that, come what may, they can’t be removed.  Hence why Momentum’s Companies are in the sole name of Lansman, who is sole director.

Since the National Committee elected the Steering Committee it is unconstitutional for the latter body to effectively abolish the body which elected it.  It recalls the famous poem "Die Lösung" (The Solution) of Bertold Brecht after the workers’ uprising in East Berlin in 1953:

After the uprising of June 17th

The Secretary of the Authors' Union

Had leaflets distributed in the Stalinallee

Which said that the people

Had forfeited the government's confidence

And could only win it back

By redoubled labour. Wouldn't it

Be simpler in that case if the government

Dissolved the people and

Elected another?

In an email issued by Momentum to ‘key people’ “in local groups the decision was justified by the fact that “some Momentum members, groups and regional network meetings had raised concerns about the organisation of the 5 November National Committee meeting, the process leading up to it and democratic representation and participation for Momentum members more broadly”.  We are not told who these people are nor what were their concerns were.  Still less were we told whether they had called for the NC not to meet.

If it is true that people had concerns about the November NC then this is entirely the fault of the self-same committee that is now shutting down our democracy altogether.   This body gave branches and regional committees almost no time to meet and discuss proposals for the conference or to choose delegates for the November 5 meeting. In fact, most members have not even seen the various proposals on the future of Momentum and how the conference might be run.

One member, one vote

Lansman also pushed through a motion which stipulates that the conference must be organised via a system of “online voting for all members” – the full 20,000 of them! The merits or otherwise of the various forms of representation for the conference was to be decided by the November 5 National Committee which has now been conveniently cancelled.

An excited email sent to all members on 29^th October from Momentum centrally informs us that, “Over the coming months, members will propose their ideas on Momentum’s aims, ethics, and structure. We will use digital technology to ensure that all members can be involved and shape Momentum’s future.”

This is the very opposite of democracy. It is designed to atomise individual members and undermine conference as the collective decision-making body of Momentum. It underlines the extent to which sections of the left have internalised the defeats of the past decades.  It is Thatcher’s union ‘reforms’ writ large.

To add to the confusion, it is unclear precisely what Lansman and his allies are actually proposing. Jill Mountford takes a guess that “it seems what they mean is that delegates to Momentum conference will not take any decisions but votes will instead be taken by an online ballot of all members afterwards.  This is bizarrely reminiscent of Blairism, bureaucratic manipulation veiled in plebiscitary pseudo-democracy.”

This is worse than anything Tony Blair managed to foist on the Labour Party. How can we ever again gripe about the bowdlerising of Labour Party conference democracy if we acquiesce to the travesty that Jon Lansman and his cohorts are trying to foist on to us? 

We are still in the dark as to how motions might be proposed to conference. The original Lansman plan required an initial 50 signatures for a motion to progress further. After several more hurdles had been vaulted, 1000 signatures would be required for a motion to be heard by conference. Many branches and regional committees have criticised this, calling for the threshold to be lowered. It is very likely that the National Committee meeting of November 5 would have overturned restrictive stipulations like these and challenged many more of the plans of Lansman and co. 

Clearly it is much better to just stop the NC from meeting at all!  On 29^th October I received the following email, as did other Momentum  members.  It is a classic example of deception dressed up in the language of false bravado.  I omit the final flowery paragraph:

Dear Tony,

Momentum has had a big first year. We’ve established over 150 local groups across the UK, run national campaigns, formed the backbone of Jeremy’s incredible second leadership campaign - and now we have over 20,000 members.

Momentum helps the Labour Party to become a more open, democratic and campaigns-focused organisation. We need to be member-led ourselves. You must decide the future of your organisation.

Yesterday, Momentum’s Steering Committee voted to start the process of ensuring that Momentum becomes a truly democratic member-led organisation, reflecting the new kind of politics.

Over the coming months, members will propose their ideas on Momentum’s aims, ethics, and structure. We will use digital technology to ensure that all members can be involved and shape Momentum’s future. This process will culminate in our first national conference, with online voting for all members, in February.

In solidarity,

Team Momentum

It is a classic in Orwellian hyperbole and double think.  It talks about a member led organisation when the proposals from the SC are designed to achieve the exact opposite.  The decision of the SC to distribute the arguments of those opposed to these proposals were conveniently overturned as Lansman fondly imagines that if he doesn’t distribute them people won’t oppose know about them!  Dictators far more intelligent than Lansman have harboured similar illusions!  Momentum groups are up in arms, not only about this but the removal of Jackie Walker as Vice-Chair.  

The Statement Below is a precis from Labour Party Marxists

The last 48 hours have seen all hell break lose in Momentum.  It is essential that Momentum members and branches hurry messages and resolutions into Momentum centre to condemn this latest attempt to shut down democracy in the organisation. 

At the heart of what has happened lies a deep, morbid distrust of the members and democracy. As SC member Jill Mountford put it in her report: “Sam Wheeler and Jon Lansman spent far too much time arguing that local groups and the regional committees were undemocratic and unrepresentative.” 

Momentum branches are forbidden to send emails to all Momentum members in their area. All communications must be routed through Momentum nationally, presumably so the content can be vetted.

·         Momentum branches have been told not to bring their members together in constituencies and wards to work to maximise their political impact in these geographical units of the party. This makes it very hard to effectively cohere the Labour left in these locales. The official reason for this restriction is that the Labour Party does not allow the affiliation of organisations with a ‘mirror' structure, as the rule book dubs it. But then, Momentum is not affiliated to the Labour Party, it is not a party. Its members should be working together in cohesive units, sharing experiences and discussing in their democratic local forums the direction of their national organisation. 

·         Apart from sending out insipid campaigning news, the Momentum leadership does not communicate with its members. There are no minutes, no reports, no agendas of the organisation’s committees. Some “key contacts”, as they are dubbed, in some branches sometimes receive a little information. A few of these comrades forward this intel to some other people some of the time. In effect this has helped to create local cliques that monopolise key information. The vast majority of Momentum membership have no idea of who runs their organisation, what decisions they take and how. 

Momentum’s claim to represent some sort of clean “new kind of politics” is starting to look very much like the old type of politics – decisions taken before  meetings have even convened, a disregard of basic constitutional principles, an existing clique trying to preserve its own power.  In fact the  behaviour of Jon Lansman, Sam Tarry and co. seems to resemble nothing so much as the behaviour of Iain McNicol and Tom Watson.   They are the very antithesis of democratic socialism.

The London Momentum regional committee on October 29 voted by 31 to 0 (with 2 abstentions) for the following motion.  For a Report see here

This meeting of the London Momentum Regional Committee censures the National Steering Committee for cancelling the meeting of the National Committee that was scheduled for 5 November and agreeing a method of organising the national conference without waiting for the National Committee to discuss it.

We do not recognise the legitimacy of the Steering Committee to make these decisions. We call for these decisions of the National Steering Committee to be rescinded and for the NC to proceed as originally scheduled on 5 November.

 

2) The Labour Representation Committee:  

LRC national conference  passed this resolution at its October 29 conference:

LRC AGM condemns the decision of yesterday's Momentum SC to cancel the scheduled NC for 5th November and its decision to abandon a delegate conference in February.

3) Model motion from Labour Party Marxists:

This meeting condemns the decision by a hastily convened emergency meeting of the Momentum Steering Committee on October 28 to cancel the November 5 meeting of the National Committee. This NC was scheduled to decide the organisational details of our first national conference in February 2017.

Important decisions on the future of Momentum should involve as many members as possible. Six people on the national Steering Committee (a body that was supposed to be re-elected in August 2016) have decided to stop branches and regional committees to have their say on the future of our organisation.

We call for the National Committee meeting, re-arranged for December 10, to go ahead. It must discuss and make decisions on all issues pertaining to the organisation of our conference, including voting arrangements, delegate credentials and ratios, the future composition of the National Committee, etc.

 Jill Mountford who is a member of the Momentum Steering Committee has blogged on what happened at the meeting of 28^th October because of course Lansman and co. would not dream of distributing minutes or a report of the meeting.

Momentum Steering Committee cancels 5 November NC, but we win vote for new date (including who voted how)

* For cancelling 5 November: Jon Lansman, Darren Williams, Sam Tarry, Marsha Jane Thompson, Christine Shawcroft, Sam Wheeler.

Against: Jill Mountford, Michael Chessum, Cecile Wright.
Abstaining: Martyn Cook.

** For calling a new NC in December: Darren Williams, Martyn Cook, Cecile Wright, Jill Mountford, Michael Chessum, Christine Shawcroft.

Abstaining: Jon Lansman, Marsha Jane Thompson, Sam Wheeler, Sam Tarry.

I must confess to being surprised by the vote of Christine Shawcroft who is part of the split in Labour Briefing.  She voted for the removal of Jackie Walker as vice-chair of Momentum but I took that to be  because of bad blood between the groups.  This vote is inexplicable. 

Another member of the Momentum Steering Committee, Michael Chessum, explains his vote against Lansman’s proposals.

‘What do you call it when an executive votes to abolish the legislature?...

Momentum's steering committee met tonight in a meeting that was called with less than a day's notice, ostensibly to consider delaying the National Committee meeting which was due to meet on November 5th. I went to the meeting prepared to oppose the move (it's already 6 months since our democratic structures met) and expected to find myself in a minority. The NC was due to discuss (among other things) the composition and processes for Momentum's February conference, which would in turn decide our structures. In advance of it, local groups and regions had patchily met to discuss various proposals.

But my initial concerns were blown out of the water. Instead, the meeting not only voted to postpone the NC to December, but to bypass the NC entirely and make the decision that Momentum's conference should effectively not happen (instead being a live streamed national gathering), and momentum's structures decided by e-ballot. This was in a meeting called with 19 hours notice.

A lot of this was justified with an attitude of "it can't possibly be undemocratic to let all members vote, so pack up your deliberative structures and democratically agreed processes". Now I don't know about anyone else who's been around the Labour movement for more than 5 minutes, but I've heard that strain of logic before - and i dont mean from the left.

Now even if you think that literally all of the organisation's decisions should be taken by OMOV (personally I favour a mixed system with both OMOV and delegate meetings; but I can quite see how with a complex conference structures debate you might want a delegate debate rather than an atomized online vote), but whatever your view, this is just an outrageous, farcical way for that decision to be made.

Momentum is fantastic - and so are many of the people who frankly found themselves on the wrong side on this - but I really worry about the left sometimes, and how some bits of it have absorbed the modus operandi of blairism during the wilderness years.

Jackie Walker has also issued a statement:

"I am making a statement on the working of the Momentum Steering Committee.

Up till now, despite others commenting freely, and often in an uninformed way, I have agreed to be silent. However, events of the last few days have changed this.

'Almost immediately after the Jewish Labour Movement began to tweet against me after the training event, a 'senior member' of Momentum joined in, briefing the press, in particular a Guardian journalist, Joan Elgot. Interestingly those tweets have since been removed, though screenshots have been taken. This was very soon followed by full articles, both in the on-line and paper version, which said "The Guardian understands her removal from the post is likely to be confirmed when the committee meets on Monday. A spokesperson for the left wing grassroots movement, which was set up to support Jeremy Corbyn as leader of the party, confirmed members wanted her to go." I was also informed by the Guardian, as were others on the Steering Committee, at the same time as the Guardian Leadership, the date and outcome of the meeting to remove me. Included in this same article were comments by Manuel Cortes, Gen Sec of the TSSA, threatening to remove Momentum from TSSA premises if I were not removed. This came, I believe, soon after Cortes had publicly called me a rabid anti-Semite, or something to that effect.

While the press may have known when the meeting to remove me would be, as well as the result, I was given only 48 hours notice of the hearing and no details either of how it would be run or what the charges were against me, despite repeated requests. The extraordinary spectacle of a group of trades unionist treating a comrade in a way THEY would not accept had they been representing me as trades unionist was shameful to our movement. No statement was taken from me or from anyone who had been at the JLM training event. The irony is the SC used evidence from the same media sources that had recently condemned Jeremy as an incompetent, an antisemite and a terrorist.

After this kangaroo court, I asked for a complaint of this process to be forwarded to the NC and for an investigation to be launched about the leak. A meeting of the SC voted against giving me access to the NC. I know who leaked, as do many people on the SC.

As to the most recent example of the lack of democracy of the SC, on Thursday at 10:30pm I received a notification of an emergency SC meeting. There was no mention of a discussion on how the conference would be run. A number of people could not make, or would not agree to come to such a meeting. A number of people, including myself and Matt Wrack, protested as to undemocratic process. Some members agreed to phoned in. Imagine my shock the next morning at being informed both that the NC was to be postponed and that the decision had been made by the SC that conference votes would be made on line. This occurred even though at least 2 papers were outlining different process of voting at conference had been tabled for discussion at the (now cancelled) NC.

The sovereign body is the NC. The SC is there to implement their decisions. This is an outrage.

The two examples I describe here are just the most well known of a general culture of disdain which too many members of the SC have supported. It is crucial that this changes.’ 

Racism, chauvinism and petty spite as Lansman fulfills his promise to the 'Jewish' Labour Movement

Jackie Walker - An Anti-racist Fallen Among Thieves

Picket by Jewish anti-Zionist groups of Momentum meeting at TSSA HQ

Momentum statement following meeting last night

John McDonnell speaking on the same platform as Jackie Walker in Brighton last month - for which the JLM criticised him

Jeremy Newmark - Chair of Zionist Labour Movement formerly CEO of Jewish Leadership Council - an organisation of big Jewish business leaders

At a three hour meeting tonight at the headquarters of the TSSA, Jackie Walker – a Black/Jewish anti-racist, was removed as Vice Chair of Momentum despite the overwhelming support she has received from the rank and file of Momentum.  The vote was 7-3.

The actions of Lansman and the Alliance for Workers Liberty have directly aided Crooked Iain McNicol and the Labour Party Witch hunters and Compliance Unit

This tweet is one of many attempts to whip up a racist atmosphere against Jackie Walker by the JLM

The 8 elected members of the Steering Committee are Jon Lansman, as Chair, Jackie Walker, who was not present, Michael Chessum, Treasurer, Christine Shawcroft, Marshajane Thompson, Jill Mountford, Sam Wheeler, Cecile Wright.  In addition there is also Matt Wrack of the FBU and Sam Tarry of TSSA.

Jewish picket of Momentum meeting at TSSA HQ

Those voting for removing Jackie included Lansman, the 2 Alliance for Worker’s Liberty members, Chessum and Mountford and it is believed 2 other AWL ‘sleepers’ on the committee, Christine Shawcroft, who is a member of the other Labour Briefing which split acrimoniously some years ago and Sam Tarry.  Matt Wrack is known to have voted to support Jackie.

We are joined by a UCU picket!

Lansman, who personally ‘owns’ Momentum as its sole Director, used the 4 votes of the AWL members present to pass the resolution witch-hunting Jackie Walker.  The irony of those on the receiving end of the witch hunt, for it was only a few weeks ago that Owen Smith condemned the ‘anti-Semites’ of the AWL entryists, voting to engage in a witch hunter of their own is a combination of deviant political psychology and naked sectarianism. 

In a statement issued afterwards it was confirmed that Jackie Walker remains a member of the Steering Committee.  It is a statement full of weasel words.  It accepts that nothing Jackie said ‘taken individually’ was anti-Semitic (though leaving open the interpretation that they might be taken as a whole.   But they were nonetheless ‘ill informed, ill judged and offensive’. 

Representatives from Jewish anti-Zionist groups

These are of course subjective adjectives and in this case they are best applied to the statement itself.  What Jackie said about Holocaust Memorial Day not including all other holocausts, in particular those affecting Africans, is simply true. 

A lively picket as Lansman and SC members largely slunk in through a side door

As 16 Jewish members of the Labour Party  wrote, in a letter to Jon Lansman no less than Yehuda Bauer, Professor of Holocaust Studies at the Hebrew University, Jerusalem (albeit an extremely mediocre historian) argued, in a debate with the late Dr Sybil Milton, Senior Historian at the US Holocaust Memorial Museum that ‘the Nazis only attempted to annihilate one people, the Jews: Roma were not Jews, therefore there was no need to murder all of them.’  According to Bauer, ‘the Holocaust is very much a unique case.’ [“Gypsies and the Holocaust” Yehuda Bauer; Sybil Milton The History Teacher, Vol. 25, (Aug., 1992)].  This is an article of faith for Zionism. To Zionists the Holocaust was a Jewish only affair from which the Gypsies and Disabled are excluded.  The late Elie Wiesel said that to compare the sufferings of others with Jews was a “betrayal of Jewish history”. [Against Silence, v. iii, 146.]  Lucy Dawidowicz, a well known holocaust historian and right-wing Zionist, held that ‘subsuming Jewish losses under a universal or ecumenical classification is to effectively justify anti-Semitism.’   The truth may be uncomfortable but it is not anti-Semitic. 

Telling the truth however, according to Lansman’s weasel words is ‘offensive and ill-judged.’  If Lansman and the 6 who voted with him possessed anything resembling an intellect, they would appreciate that the right to offend and be offensive is the very essence of free speech.  Politicians who curtail their language for the sake of not giving offence are being dishonest.  The charge of being ‘ill-informed’ applies to the dirty seven not Jackie Walker. 

Jackies other comment concerning there being no standard definition of anti-Semitism is simply a matter of fact.  As we wrote in the Jewish letter to Lansman: 

Jon Lansman - unelected Momentum boss and property developer - together with Alliance 4 Workers Liberty have given the green light to witch hunters

 ‘Jackie Walker was also right to question the JLM’s assertion that the EUMC’s Working Definition of Anti-Semitism was the standard definition of what constitutes anti-Semitism.  This is simply dishonest.  In 2013, this definition was scrapped by the EU's Fundamental Rights Agency, as the Times of Israel reported ‘’The European Union’s agency for combating racism dropped its definition for anti-Semitism… We are not aware of any official definition [of anti-Semitism],” Blanca Tapia of the EU’s Fundamental Rights Agency told JTA on Tuesday.’ 

Far from Jackie being ill-informed it was Lansman and company who were guilty of that sin.  But since we had already been sent our letter, before the meeting and given the assurance of James Schneider to us that the all members of the Committee would be made aware of the letter, then the seven cannot be accused of being ill-informed.  They were liars employing verbal subterfuges.

What is most outrageous about the statement is that although it calls for Jackie not to be expelled, it says nothing about lifting her suspension.  In practice even this token call for Jackie not to be expelled has to be seen in the light of the Steering Committee’s removal of Jackie as Vice Chair.  In essence the SC has given a green light for her expulsion.  The Alliance for Workers Liberty, because of its support for Zionism, Israel and the Jewish Labour Movement, has gone along with Jackie’s removal as Vice Chair.  As such they have behaved as political scabs, giving de facto support to her expulsion.  This from a so-called Trotskyist organisation.  Momentum supporters throughout the country should draw the conclusion that AWL members cannot be trusted to fight against the witch-hunt and their Campaign Against the Purge is a self-serving organisation devoted primarily to saving their own skins.  It should be avoided like the plague.

Perhaps the most outrageous aspect of the fitting up of Jackie Walker, because in reality when she went to the JLM’s training event at Labour Party conference she was walking into a honey trap, is that the whole affair was secretly filmed and the video footage was immediately handed to the media.  What kind of ‘training event’ is it that passes film of an event to the media in order that they can attack the participants for what they have said?  Only someone like liar Jeremy Newmark, who is the political equivalent of a semi-house trained polecat.

The very fact that the JLM had been allowed to run a ‘training event’ on anti-Semitism when it is a racist organisation which makes a speciality of accusing anti-Zionists of ‘anti-Semitism’ is outrageous.  Having the JLM run an anti-racist course is like having a serial wife batter placed in charge of a women’s refuge or having Nick Griffin of the BNP placed in charge of a course in muli-culturalism.

All that Lansman’s statement could manage in this regard was an expression of ‘concern’  not condemnation for the fact that ‘footage of a training session was leaked to the press.’  The reason for this mild criticism, they don’t mention the JLM by name was that it ‘undermines much need political education.’  As if a ‘training session’ on anti-Semitism by the JLM had anything to do with political 

education. 

Again this sordid statement of Lansman and company talks about ‘applying the principles’ of the Chakrabarti Report.  In fact the Chakrabarti Report is quite good on the question of anti-racism training.  Anti-racist groups such as the Institute of Race Relations have repeatedly criticised ‘racism awareness training’ (RAT) for the Police as more a means of getting to know the enemy better than combatting racism within the force.  Chakrabarti  states that:

On reflection, and having gauged the range of feelings within the Party, it is not my view that narrow anti-racism training programmes are what is required. There is a grave danger that such an approach would seem patronising or otherwise insulting rather than truly empowering and enriching for those taking part. 

Before the meeting we heard that Ronnie Draper, President of the Bakers Union, who was himself suspended by Iain McNicol, the Labour Party’s General Secretary in the run-up to the vote, had come out against the removal of Jackie as had Matt Wrack.  This led some of us to think that Momentum might be reconsidering its decision but it is clear that Lansman has invested too much in appeasing the right to back down now.

On Sunday in the Observer, Lansman squashed calls to elect a new Deputy Leader, thus giving his support to Tom Watson and he also opposed moves to deselect the Right of the PLP.  It is clear that Lansman’s ‘strategy’ if one can call it that is one of naked appeasement of the Right and a determination that Momentum will be kept in check, a stage army, that will not be allowed to develop a life of its own or become a genuinely democratic organisation. 

It is though essential that Momentum members do not resign because of the machinations of Lansman.  Instead we should organise to ensure that, despite the wishes of Lansman, Momentum does become the property of its members rather than a self-selected elite.

The major campaign now within Momentum must be for the democratisation of the organisation.  It’s national conference should be brought forward from next February.  It is incumbent upon us to ensure that in future, the Steering Committee is directly elected, or at least the officers are directly elected by Momentum Conference itself.

Lansman made it clear in the run up to the removal of Jackie Walker that he was in the business of appeasing the Jewish Labour Movement.  This group is the British branch of the Israeli Labour Party.  Its new Director Ella Rose comes directly from the Israeli Embassy and Jeremy Newmark, its Chair has openly said that it would be ‘rather odd” to suggest that the organization should have no contact with the embassy.’  Most people consider that working with the Israeli Embassy is odd. In short the JLM is effectively an emanation of the Israeli state within the Labour Party.  This is an anomalous situation that cannot be allowed to continue.  One may as well give the CIA special rights of representation at Conference.  The JLM does not represent Jewish members of the Labour Party but only the most right-wing Zionist members.

I am pleased to say that members of Jews for Boycotting Israeli Goods, International Jewish Anti-Zionist Network and Free Speech on Israel picketed the headquarter of TSSA, where Momentum were meeting and we understand that this seriously rattled the Steering Committee.  Being forced to face the membership is not something that property developer Jon Lansman finds at all attractive or appealing.

This whole episode smacks of treachery.  For months now Zionist organisations have been out to get Jackie.  She has been subjected to unbelieveable amounts of racist abuse on Twitter and elsewhere.  I have previously described what was happening to her as a form of political lynching and race baiting. [The Jewish Labour Movement and its Political Lynching of Jackie Walker]  Zionists openly proclaimed that being Black Jackie could not be Jewish.  Rather than condemning the vile outbursts of his supporters, Jeremy Newmark of JLM gave them the green light.  Now it would appear Jon Lansman and the majority of the Momentum Steering Committee, including the Alliance for Workers Liberty, have also endorsed this racist filth.

Tony Greenstein