Showing posts with label Mearsheimer. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Mearsheimer. Show all posts

14 March 2026

Trump’s War Has No Plan But It Does Have a Goal – To Destroy Opposition to US & Israeli Hegemony in the Middle East - Whatever the Cost

 What the War Exposes is the Underlying Weakness and Brittleness of US Domination & the Complicity of the Arab Regimes With Zionism & Genocide

John Mearsheimer: No Winning in Iran for the U.S.

The war against Iran and Trump’s threat to escalate it are a perfect example of the madness of capitalism and its military-industrial complex, which is based on destruction for its own sake. Having got himself into a war Trump doesn’t have what John Mearsheimer describes as an off-ramp.


Trump and Hegseth’s only strategy is to go yet further up the escalation ramp and to threaten even more devastation unless Iran stops blocking the Straits of Hormuz. This is highly unlikely to work. On the contrary Iran has the ability to take out nearly all of the neighbouring Arab state’s oil facilities, meaning there will be no need to block the straits.

Desalination plants are crucial to the very existence of the Gulf states. In Kuwait, about 90% of drinking water comes from desalination, the figure is 86% in Oman, about 70% in Saudi Arabia, 42% in the UAE, 90%  and about 50% in Israel.

There have already been attacks –  by the US on a desalination plant on the island of Qeshm, in the Straits of Hormuz and an Iranian attack the next day on a Bahranian plant. Iran is less dependent on desalination but if the US military or Israel is mad enough to attack its plants then Iran could strike back.


It goes without saying that an attack on desalination plants is a war crime but Israel has continually attacked water treatment plants in Gaza. In March 2025 two desalination plants in Deir al-Balah were forced to close after Israeli forces cut electricity supplies.

Before the war broke out I agreed with Mearsheimer that there was a good chance that the US would not attack Iran. Why? Because it was impossible to see what the end game was. But that was to ignore the essential irrationality of US imperialism and its drive for hegemony in the Middle East.

Even Starmer understood that you can’t effect regime change from the air, which is why he initially refused to allow the US to use British bases. This attracted the wrath of Britain’s most notorious war criminal, Tony Blair, for whom war is like a love potion. Starmer then reversed his decision.

It appears that the sole reason for the war is to inflict as much damage on Iran and if possible to make it a failed state. It is blood letting for its own sake. The purported reason for the attack, the issue of nuclear weapons, is a fiction since not only was Iran not building such a weapon but the assassinated President Khameini had issued a fatwa in 2003 prohibiting their development. US intelligence concurred.



 

Nor was the war intended to liberate the Iranian people from an oppressive regime. On the contrary it is inflicting as much pain as it can on them including murdering over 175 people, mainly school girls in Minab, an all-girls elementary school.

This has been verified by Bellingcat among others. Our own miserable ‘Defence’ Secretary John Healey condemned ‘indiscriminate’ Iranian attacks on Bahrain military bases but refused to condemn US attacks on Iran, including the bombing of the school. Trump simply denied US responsibility claiming that Iran had done it.


Why America is Losing the War With Iran (w/ John Mearsheimer) | 

The Chris Hedges Report

The war in Iran is not though simply a war fought on the whim of an incontinent and deranged felon who became President because of the lack of an alternative.

It would also be wrong to describe the war as having been fought on behalf of Israel, despite Secretary of State Marco Rubio having said that if Israel had not given notice that it would attack Iran regardless, there would probably have been no war. Trump apparently feared that the US’s bases would be targeted by Iran in the case of an Israeli attack.

It would however have been quite possible for the US to tell Israel that it was on its own if it attacked Iran. It could even have informed Iran that in the event of an Israeli attack it wouldn’t be joining in or defending Israel from its missiles, which would have meant that Iran would have concentrated solely on Israel. However this would fly in the face of US foreign policy which is to defend Israel at all costs.


John Mearsheimer: U.S. Already Lost Iran War - No Off-Ramp in Sight

There is not surprisingly a deep scepticism and disbelief about the incoherent and contradictory reasons given for the attack on Iran - nuclear enrichment, support for ‘terrorist’ groups and ballistic missiles.

That explains why the belief that Trump is trying to knock Epstein off the front pages is so strongly held. Democrats agreed with this by an 81-14 margin. Even a quarter of Republicans believe that Trump launched the war as a distraction from Epstein.

The irony is that both the US and Israel possess nuclear weapons and Israel has hinted that in the event of a threat to its existence, even from conventional weapons, it would put into operation the Samson Option, i.e. destroy everybody.

It is important to understand that even if Trump didn’t want the war to begin at a time of Israel’s choosing, he was forced to join Israel’s attack, not because of the Lobby but because it can’t allow its rabid attack dog, Israel, which is the projection of US power in the Middle East, to be battered by Iran’s missiles. A defeat for Israel would be a defeat for American prestige and power in the region.

Those who think that Israel and ‘The Lobby’ controls American Foreign Policy, like e.g. David Miller, can’t explain how a tiny country with few natural resources can control a superpower many times its size and power. Which explains Miller’s belief that a Global Jewish Empire has arisen which has successfully captured the US (& British) states!

What the war has done, with Iran’s attack on US bases in the Gulf, is exposed both the complicity of the Arab regimes with US domination of the Middle East and their fragility. Every single Gulf regime harbours US bases, whose main purpose is to protect the regimes against their own people as much as any external enemy. The regimes are junior allies of the Americans in the oppression of their peoples.

Given that Israel is supported to the hilt by the US, and the genocide in Gaza could not have happened without its support militarily, these Arab regimes are fully complicit in both the genocide and the annexation and terror on the West Bank.

Politically what this means for the Palestinian struggle is that the Arab regimes are no less an enemy than Israel and Zionism. Their relationship to US imperialism and therefore Israel is much like that of a prostitute to a pimp.

War on Iran threatens global energy supply

What Trump has also demonstrated is that the US Empire has no rationale or justification beyond its assertion that might is right. There was no logic or rationale in attacking Iran. Trump did not pretend, as Bush and Blair did in 2003 in Iraq, that this was a war for democracy and nation building.

Trump paid lip-service to Iran’s protesters. His promise to protect them was hollow. His only concern was about the interests of the Empire and its main ally Israel. This is not something that an Empire confident in itself would do. It suggests that the days of a unipolar world are coming to an end and that the US Empire is overstretched, militarily and economically.

Trump was accused of trying to effect regime change but even this is doubtful. The killing of Khameini by Israel was an end in itself. It is unlikely that his assassination was seen as likely to cause the regime to crumble. Creating a failed ethnically divided state seems to have been the main objective.

There will be no nation building or pretence that there is anything good likely to come out of the attack on Iran.

Trump is an ideal representative of the decline of US imperialism. He personifies mafia capitalism. Apart from the allegations of rape, child abuse and paedophilia against him he is incapable of telling the truth (a trait Starmer shares), amoral, narcissistic and venal. His corruption, racism and authoritarianism mark him out.

The fact that European leaders  such as Merz, Macron and Starmer do their best to placate and praise him demonstrates that servility, deference and fawning are the main qualities needed in bourgeois politics today.

The US went into Venezuela and kidnapped its President in order to steal its oil. There used to be a fiction that imperialism benefitted those it oppressed. It was the White Man’s Burden. We drained India of its riches on the pretence that we were bringing it civilisation despite the natives’ ingratitude. Trump doesn’t even pretend to be serving a greater good.

The US blew fishermen’s boats out of the water in the Caribbean and then ‘War Secretary’ Pete Hegseth instructed the military to kill any survivors in a ‘double tap’ strike.

Judges of the International Criminal Court are sanctioned as is the UN Rapporteur on Palestine, Francesca Albanese. Trump even threatened to invade Greenland. The attack on Iran is part and parcel of the criminality that Trump has made into an art form. Israel is his ideal partner.

Meanwhile the Zionist state, which should be seen as the United States’ crazy diseased dog in the Middle East is indulging its own blood lust in Lebanon as part of Netanyahu’s Greater Israel fantasy.

Despite the terrorist pager attack last year, Israel has been surprised by Hezbollah’s defence of Lebanon. Hezbollah realises that if it doesn’t strike now then it will suffer later.

Cabinet Ministers such as Clare Short and Robin Cook resigned from Blair’s government at the time of the Iraq War. It says everything you need to know about the Labour government today that not even one of Starmer’s cabinet has anything approaching a backbone.

War demonstrates US weakness in Middle East

What the war also demonstrates is the fundamental weakness of Trump’s policy in the Middle East, its incoherence and the failure to articulate the reasons for the attack on Iran. This is reflected in the fact that the war is unpopular even in the United States, in contrast to the support the Iraq War had. This is compounded by the fear that the attack on Iran has weakened rather than strengthened the US position in the Middle East.

The war is also unpopular in Europe. Only in Israel is the war popular, some 93% of Israeli Jews supporting it. Blood letting is one of the few things that bind Israelis together.

The attack on Iran left America’s Arab allies vulnerable whilst being unable to take out a regime hostile to it. An attack on what you perceive an enemy without a clear aim or goal is not a sign of strength. Trump simply ignored the economic consequences of his war.

Absurdly Trump demanded that he should have a say over who was Iran’s new leader before demanding unconditional surrender. His narcissistic behaviour is more akin to a child who can’t get his own way issuing threats and indulging in bluster.  Trump is a child in charge of a deadly military.

What is amazing is that Iran’s blocking the Straits of Hormuz was not anticipated. Anyone with a cursory knowledge of the region could have forecast that. What is hurting the United States government today are the economic repercussions and the rise in the price of oil above $100. Economists forecast it could go above $150 a barrel.

A War Based on a Lie

Truth is always the first casualty in a war. If you only watched the BBC you’d be forgiven for believing that no Iranian missiles have struck Israel. Israel has strict censorship and the BBC is happy to comply in spirit and deed.

In 2003 we had WMD in Iraq but none is so dishonest as Trump’s claim that he had launched the war in order “to defend the American people by eliminating imminent threats from the Iranian regime.”

No one in their right mind could seriously believe that the United States was under ‘imminent threat’. Yet Trump justified his war of aggression by claiming that:

we sought repeatedly to make a deal. We tried. They wanted to do it. They didn't want to do it. ... They just wanted to practice evil.

But Iran refused, just as it has for decades and decades, they rejected every opportunity to renounce their nuclear ambitions, and we can't take it anymore.

In fact negotiations were in progress when the United States launched its attacks. Trump’s lies are not even convincing.

This after Trump had claimed in the summer that he had ‘obliterated Iran’s nuclear capability.’ In fact a deal had almost been reached, according to Oman’s Foreign Minister, when Trump attacked.  A carbon copy of what happened in the summer.

The claim that Iran was developing nuclear weapons was entirely bogus. Iran’s threat was to Israel’s domination of the region. Slightly more plausible is Iran’s support for resistance organisations in the region – Hamas, Hezbollah and the Houthis. As for their final demand, to remove their ballistic missiles, this was in effect demanding that Iran render itself defenceless against future Israeli attacks.

Despite Israel’s assertion that Iran is an existential threat to it, in 1985 it behaved very differently. As Peter Beinart writes

Israel sold Iran 100 anti-tank missiles. Israel spent much of the 1980s arming Iran in its war against Iraq, which the Jewish state saw as a much graver threat.... When Iran acquired its first ballistic missile in 1985, in an effort to counter Iraq, Israel supplemented the Islamic Republic’s arsenal with shorter-range missiles of its own. Haaretz has even reported that some of the anti-tank missiles later fired by Hezbollah at Israeli forces were likely sold by Israel to Iran in the 1980s.... (as) Trita Parsi (noted) in his book A Single Role of the Dice, “Throughout the 1980s, no one in Israel said anything about an Iranian threat—the word wasn’t even uttered.”

Beinart goes on to say that

In May 2003, after the Bush administration’s invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq, Iran sent the US government a secret message: If the US lifted sanctions, ceased trying to overthrow the Islamic Republic, and accepted Tehran’s right to peaceful nuclear energy, Iran would end its support for Hamas and Islamic Jihad, pressure Hezbollah to disarm, place its nuclear program under international inspection, and support the 2002 Arab Peace Initiative,

In 1996, according to Parsi’s book, Treacherous Alliance, Iran pressured Hezbollah to accept a ceasefire after a 16-day skirmish with Israel. If the claim that Iran poses a grave threat to Israel is far-fetched, the claim that it poses a grave threat to the United States is even more absurd

In other words this is a war fought on lies to defend the indefensible. And contrary to the propaganda of the BBC and other media, support for Iran against imperialism’s attack is not defence of the regime itself.

Tony Greenstein

Posted by at 14 comments:
Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

30 July 2025

Why has Israel Become a Mirror Image of Nazi Germany and why has Yad Vashem, the Zionist holocaust memorial museum, joined the ranks of holocaust deniers?

Who would have believed that Israel would set about creating a ‘humanitarian’ concentration camp in Gaza?

Israel, Gaza, and the Empire of Lies: Dr. Gabor Maté on Truth and Trauma 

When I brought out Zionism During the Holocaust in 2022, the central theme of which was Zionist collaboration with the Nazis, many people, even some Palestine supporters, thought I was going too far in my comparisons of the Zionist movement with the Nazis.

In 2019 when I declared that Israel was Hitler’s Bastard Offspring, the Jewish Chronicle reported it as ‘Infamous anti-Israel activist Tony Greenstein called Jewish state 'Hitler's bastard offspring'. Owen Jones responded to the arguments about Zionist collaboration by saying ‘No, Jews did not collaborate in their own genocide’ which is of course true. But the Zionists certainly collaborated and worse.

"They're Arresting You For THOUGHTS": The UK's Descent into a Police State – Deep Dive Perspective

At that time Jones equated Zionists and Jews as one and the same.  I hope that today, after having opposed Israel’s genocide and being called an anti-Semite himself, Jones has had second thoughts.

Katie Halper interviews John Mearsheimer About His Statement  That Israel is Behaving Like the Nazis

Today comparisons between Israel, Zionism and the Nazis are commonplace. When John Mearsheimer, the Professor of Political Science at the University of Chicago, was interviewed by Katie Halper, he confessed that

the more time goes by... the Israelis look like the Nazis, their rhetoric, their behaviour is truly appalling. The Jewish State is behaving like the Nazis did.

Everything I’ve been saying for years has suddenly become commonplace, respectable even. How has this come about? Why is it that I saw in Israel an incipient Nazism that people have only just started to recognise with the Genocide in Gaza?

My awakening was my realisation that the Zionist narrative which placed them at the centre of resistance to the Nazis was one long lie. Whereas most Jews were horrified at the rise of the Nazis and immediately launched a Boycott of Nazi Germany, the Zionists were gleeful. Their movement could only profit at the expense of the Jews.

That was why the Zionists were so vehemently opposed to the Boycott. As the German Zionist Federation wrote in a letter to Hitler, on 21 June 1933, ‘Boycott propaganda… is in essence unZionist, because Zionism wants not to do battle but to convince and to build’.  This letter can be found in Lucy Dawidowicz’s Holocaust Reader.

No-one forced the Zionists to write this obsequious letter. It was purely voluntary, an attempt to get themselves in the good books of the Nazis. The Zionist leadership saw the rise to power of the Nazis as a ‘golden opportunity’ that must not be wasted.

Noah Lucas, a critical Zionist and a lecturer at Sheffield University wrote in Modern History of Israel that:

 ‘As the European holocaust erupted, Ben-Gurion saw it as a decisive opportunity for Zionism... Ben-Gurion above all others sensed the tremendous possibilities inherent in the dynamic of the chaos and carnage in Europe…. In conditions of peace,… Zionism could not move the masses of world Jewry. The forces unleashed by Hitler in all their horror must be harnessed to the advantage of Zionism. ... By the end of 1942… the struggle for a Jewish state became the primary concern of the movement.’ 

In October 1942, at the height of the Holocaust, Ben-Gurion surveyed the prospects for Zionism remarking to the Zionist Executive that:

Disaster is strength if channelled to a productive course. The whole trick of Zionism is that it knows how to channel our disaster, not into despondency or degradation, as is the case in the Diaspora, but into a source of creativity and exploitation.

Ben-Gurion and the Zionist leadership prioritised building a ‘Jewish’ state over rescuing Jews. They went so far as to sabotage rescue attempts that didn’t involve Palestine as a destination. If the Zionists could do this to Jews it doesn’t take much imagination to understand what they are capable of with respect to the Palestinians.

Little Nazi Becky Explaining the Need to Destroy Palestinian Children

And what is worse is that the Nazi holocaust has become the justification for Gaza’s holocaust. The Palestinians of Gaza are described by Israelis as Nazis as justification for the genocide they are perpetrating. A moment’s reflection would show how absurd this is.

It was the Nazis not their victims who had heavy weapons, aircraft and bombs. It was the Nazi military and the SS formations that carried out the most brutal of atrocities not civilians. Yet Palestinian civilians are routinely called ‘Nazis’ as a justification for their murder and obliteration. Zionism depoliticises Nazism and reduces it simply to is anti-Semitic components. Fascism is left absent.

In 1948 Ben-Gurion and his compatriots coldly planned the ethnic cleansing of the Palestinians in order that they could create a Jewish state. Even in the 55% of the portion of Palestine the UN had allotted to the Zionists there was a rough parity of Jews and Arabs. For a Jewish state to remain ethnically Jewish it was essential to expel the Palestinians. Ethnic cleansing and massacres were their only choice.

Zionism has always been something of a Nazi reprise. Did not Hitler start off with ethnic cleansing? Contrary to the Zionist belief that Nazism was solely about murdering Jews, it was dedicated to the racial resettlement of the whole of Europe and the colonisation of the East with German settlers. Just like the Nazis, the Zionists talk of  ‘lebensraum’ or living space.

For 19 years Israel was able to sell itself as a western social democratic state in the Middle East. It could do this because it had reduced the Arabs in Israel to less than 20% of the population. But with the 6 Days War in 1967 and the occupation of Gaza and the West Bank the demons were released. Labour Zionism had been wedded, no less than the Revisionists, to the idea of a Greater Israel.

It was Israeli Labor politicians who promoted the first settlers in the West Bank. Yigal Allon, the leader of the Palmach shock troops, Yisrael Galili and Yitzhak Tabenkin, all from the left of the Zionist movement helped found the Greater Israel movement.

It was but a matter of time before the settlers gained a critical mass in the West Bank. Zionism is a form of political messianism which seeks the End Days every bit as much as the Christian Evangelicals. To the messianic right in Israel’s government, the Ben Gvirs and Smotrichs, the days of redemption and the return of the Messiah are at hand.

All that is needed is the building of the Third Temple and the resumption of animal sacrifices to complete the task. Of course that means the demolition of Al Aqsa Mosque and the Dome of the Rock. That will also come to pass unless Zionism is stopped in its tracks.

Up till 1967 Israel was able to hide its apartheid nature behind a facade of granting its Palestinian citizens a vote knowing full well that in an ethnocracy they would be permanently excluded from power. Today they can’t hide it nor do they want to.

In 2015 Isaac Herzog, the then leader of the Israeli Labor Party and now President, told a gathering at Herzliya that

In about a decade, the Arabs between the Jordan and the Mediterranean will be a majority and the Jews a minority. The Jewish national home will become the Palestinian national home. We will be again, for the first time since 1948, a Jewish minority in an Arab state. I want to separate from the Palestinians. I want to keep a Jewish state with a Jewish majority. I don’t want 61 Palestinian MKs in Israel’s Knesset. I don’t want a Palestinian prime minister in Israel. I don’t want them to change my flag and my national anthem. I don’t want them to change the name of my country to Isra-stine. (my emphasis)

And there you have it. When it comes to racism, the Labour Zionism of Herzog is no different from that of Netanyahu. Perhaps it’s just that Netanyahu is more honest when he says that ‘Israel is a state of its Jewish citizens not a state of all its citizens.’

Ethnic cleansing is as integral to Zionism as water is to life. You cannot have one without the other. When ethnic cleansing is no longer feasible then Zionism, like Hitler, turns to genocide. Genocidal views of the Palestinians are shared by the majority of Israeli Jews.

The question is why the Israeli state has become the Nazi state of the 21st century. The answer is simple. Israel was founded on the same principles that the Nazis espoused.

Zionism sought to establish a racially based Jewish state. The definition of ‘Jew’ that Israel uses in the Law of Return is almost identical to the 1935 Nuremberg Laws. The Nuremberg Laws banned Jews and non-Jews from marrying and having sexual relations. In Israel too it is impossible for Jews and non-Jews to marry.


Although Israel doesn’t outlaw sexual relations between Jews and Arabs, Jews who have a relationship with an Arab are ostracised. The present Israeli Ambassador to the UK, Tzipi Hotoveli, was particularly concerned to combat intermarriage or miscegenation. It is called ‘national treason’. When a Jewish woman and an Arab man had a wedding there were demonstrations outside the reception. 

It should have been obvious that in a Jewish state, anyone who isn’t Jewish was going to be seen as an outsider. Israeli Palestinians are not even second class citizens. According to opinion polls the majority of Israelis, including most members of the present government, would like to expel them.

Israel likes to portray itself as the ‘only democracy in the Middle East’ but following the Jewish Nation State Law of 2018 Israel is officially a state of its Jewish not all its citizens.

The most enthusiastic participants in the Nazi holocaust were the Christian ethno-nationalist states of Eastern Europe, like Romania, Slovakia and Croatia. Why expect Israel to be any different?

Given the right set of circumstances any group of people can become extreme racists and genocidaires. Why should Jewish people be any different?  Racism isn’t something that is biologically inherited.

Ethno-religious states are a relic of feudalism which is why Zionism hated Jewish Emancipation. Zionism was a Jewish Supremacist settler colonial movement. It used to be able to pass itself off as having a left-wing and a right-wing but during the genocide we have not had a peep out of the ‘left’ Zionists in the Jewish Labour Movement.

The goal of Netanyahu and the Israeli government, aided by Trump, is the ethnic cleansing of Gaza. However whether they are able to get away with it remains to be seen. Hitler also began with wanting to expel the Jews and ended up exterminating them. 

The IDF is deliberately killing as many Palestinians as possible. Which is why Bobby Vylan was absolutely right to say ‘Death to the IDF’.  Those who object would have objected to ‘Death to the SS’.

Zionism was in essence a Jewish Racial Preservation Project that sought the equivalent of the thousand years Reich. It was prepared to sacrifice millions of Jews during WW2 in order to ensure the permanent life of the Jewish people-race. Ben-Gurion explained his thinking in January 1933 when he warned that

Zionism… is not primarily engaged in saving individuals’ and that if there was ‘a conflict of interest between saving individual Jews and the good of the Zionist enterprise, we shall say the enterprise comes first. [Shabtai Teveth, The Burning Ground 1886-1948), p. 855]

Chaim Weizmann, the President of the Zionist Organisation and the first President of the Israeli state was explicit in his speech to the 20th World Zionist Congress (1937) in Zurich that

The old ones will pass, they will bear their fate or they will not. They are dust, economic and moral dust, in a cruel world…. Two millions, and perhaps less She’erith Hapletah- ‘only a remnant shall survive.’ We have to accept it.

In the Autumn 1937 issue of New Judea Weizmann elaborated:

We want only the best of Jewish youth to come to us. We want only the educated to enter Palestine for the purpose of increasing its culture. The other Jews will have to stay where they are and face whatever fate awaits them.  These millions of Jews are dust on the wheels of history and they may have to be blown away. We don’t want them pouring into Palestine.

When Roosevelt called the Evian Conference in July 1938 to try and find a solution to the Jewish refugee problem the Zionists were worried, lest the conference might succeed!

Ben-Gurion at a meeting of the Jewish Agency Executive on 26 June 1938 was unremittingly hostile to Evian:

‘No rationalizations can turn the conference from a harmful to a useful one. What can and should be done is to limit the damage as far as possible.'

At the same meeting Menachem Ussishkin, a member of the Zionist Executive  said that:

He hoped to hear in Evian that Eretz Israel remains the main venue for Jewish emigration. All other emigration countries do not interest him… The greatest danger is that attempts will be made to find other territories for Jewish emigration.

If Zionism was prepared to sacrifice Jews to the Nazis to achieve its aims then it isn’t likely to have much difficult in killing Palestinians.

Last week it seemed as if the world woke up to Israel’s lies and realised that what we have been saying for nearly two years was true. Israel is perpetrating a genocide in Gaza and that includes starving the population, including children.

People are beginning to realise just what monsters Zionism has produced. The Heidi Bachrams and Victoria Bhogals of this world, with their self-serving lies and Netanyahu with his description of the SS, sorry IDF, as ‘the most moral army in the world’ are now seen for what they are – supporters of the new Auschwitz that is Gaza today.

There are even Israelis who talk of introducing gas chambers to complete the job. This is where Zionism has ended up.

Noone cut a more absurd figure than that prime piece of gammon, David Mencer, with his absurd statement that it was Hamas that was starving the people of Gaza and that the IDF was doing its best to act as wet nurse to Gaza’s babies.

When the Daily Express of all papers leads on successive days with pictures of the emaciated bodies of Palestinian babies even the most stupid Zionist knows or should know that the game is up.

Alistair Campbell admits that its genocide in Gaza & says false accusations of antisemitism are preventing debate!

Even people like Piers Morgan and Alistair Campbell now accept that Israel is carrying out a genocide and are beginning to understand that they have been on the wrong side of history.

No one should doubt that it is a holocaust in Gaza. When the dust settles on the rubble, it is likely that the number of deaths will be in the hundreds of thousands.

The only people who are unmoved are Starmer and Trump.  Trump is still blaming Hamas for what is happening in Gaza but the United States too is losing. The leader of the ‘free world’ is actively complicit in a Nazi-style genocide and yet Trump and Starmer, to say nothing of the Germans, are still supplying Israel with weapons.

Israeli leaders have been open about their intentions. It is the intention to wipe out and destroy a people that made this a genocide.

Israel Deliberately Burns the Food That It Prevented From Being Distributed

It is not as if the genocide deniers weren’t warned. On 9th October Defence Minister Yoav Gallant spelled out exactly what Israel’s strategy was going to be when, in an an echo of Himmler’s description of the untermenschen he declared:

“I have ordered a complete siege on the Gaza Strip. There will be no electricity, no food, no fuel, everything is closed, ... We are fighting human animals and we are acting accordingly

Gallant was not alone. Netanyahu compared the Palestinians to Amalek, who God commanded the Israelites to wipe out – to the very last child and suckling infant. President Isaac Herzog stated that there were no innocents in Gaza and Rabbi Eliyahu Mali, of the Bnei Moshe yeshiva openly advocated  the murder of Palestinian children because they are the future generation of Palestinian fighters.

Today's terrorists are the children of the prior [military] operation that left them alive. The women are essentially the ones who are producing the terrorists,... It's not only the 14 or 16-year-old boy, the 20 or 30-year-old man who takes up a weapon against you but also the future generation. There's really no difference

Mali and Israel’s other Nazi Rabbis have long been making the same argument that Himmler made about  Jewish children. At Posnan on October 6, 1943 Himmler told the SS Generals:

For I did not consider myself justified in exterminating the men—in other words, killing them or having them killed—and then allowing their children to grow up to wreak vengeance on our children and grandchildren.

Bob Geldof Asks How Israel Can Betray Its History by Starving Children - But This is Its History

When Bob Geldof was quizzed by Trevor Philips on Sky about the claims of Netanyahu that there was no famine he simply responded ‘he’s a liar’. One suspects that the BBC, which would have both sided the Nazi holocaust, would have edited it out.

The tide has turned, at least for now, as Israel’s Nazi leaders realise that their lies are no longer believed. Perhaps the final straw was setting up the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, run by mercenaries, who killed those seeking food along with the IDF.  The GHF is a death trap run by a Christian Evangelist, the Rev. Johnnie Moore.

Over one thousand Palestinians were murdered in their attempt to stave off starvation yet still the Zionists and Mencer blamed Hamas which was doing its best to protect the food from the criminal gangs Israel had armed, as Netanyahu has admitted.

Although food has begun to enter Gaza Israel has not let up on its bombardment of civilians. Compared to the IDF, Hamas are the equivalent of Sunday school teachers. They have sought, against the odds, to protect the people of Gaza from the Nazi wolves that have descended upon the Gaza Strip. Their proscription is an outrage.

It is no wonder that Starmer’s Labour has plumbed new depths of unpopularity. It has nothing to say, still less do because it is tied at the hip to Trump’s lawless regime in the US. Starmer’s promise to recognise a Palestinian state by September is an empty gesture. There is no Palestinian state so how can one recognise one? It is symbolic at best. If he were serious he would stop the supply of arms.

However even the more intelligent sections of the British ruling class realise that whereas Blair was, at least until the Iraq war, a sophisticated advocate of their interests, Starmer and his clique of self-serving careerists are both inarticulate and corrupt. Starmer managed to secure the most freebies despite being a millionaire.

Yvette Cooper’s proscription of Palestine Action is also beginning to haunt her.  If she had heeded the advice of Home Office officials she would have ignored the pressure of the Israeli government and the Zionist lobby. Yvette Cooper is a stupid woman, a rich, white ‘feminist’ who hypocritically identifies with the Suffragettes, who not only damaged property but also had a bombing campaign. They were called criminals and terrorists in their time.

Such is the groundswell of opposition to the ban that the heavy handed tactics of the Metropolitan Police and the Liverpool Police, far from frightening people off are causing them to defy this law in ever greater numbers.  It will be interesting to see whether Judge Chamberlain has a sensitive antennae or whether he will do what judges often do which is to rail at anything approaching subversion.

Either way August 9th on which date Defend Our Juries have called for 500 people to hold signs supporting Palestine Action is likely to be oversubscribed. Police this week in Totnes, Devon and Edinburgh decided not to arrest the ‘terrorists’ including George Monbiot.

When a law lacks public support and is seen to attack the most basic of all liberties, the right to protest, people have no option to break the law. The law has become an instrument of coercion and oppression and it is an illegitimate law as Martin Luther King called it.  Or in the words of Dame Heather Hallett it is an oppressive law.

Israel may think it has won a military victory but the reality today is that it has drained away its support. It has shown that it is a failed, genocidal state which no more deserves to exist than the Nazi state or the Apartheid South African state.

Perhaps the final straw is the plan of the Israeli state and its Defence Minister, to establish what even Ehud Olmert, a former Prime Minister has described as a concentration camp.

The holocaust in Gaza has exposed like nothing before it the moral vacuum and sheer hollowness of the Holocaust industry. All its clichés about learning from the holocaust are seen to be nothing but empty words aimed at legitimising Zionism and its bastard child.

The former Chair of Yad Vashem, Avner Shalev, denied that Israel was perpetrating a genocide in Gaza. The present Chair of Yad Vashem, the former fascist and member of the anti-Arab Tehiya party, Dani Dayan, doubled down on this claiming that such a comparison ‘desecrates the memory of the victims.’

What desecrates the memory of Jewish holocaust victims is shooting children in the head and starving them to death, creating torture camps and razing Gaza to the ground in the same way as the Nazis raised the Warsaw Ghetto to the ground. What really defiles the memory of the holocaust victims is when one in two Jewish Israelis, indeed more than that, support the extermination of all Palestinians.

However Yad Vashem was not founded to draw universal lessons from the Nazi holocaust. Its purpose was to use the holocaust in order to justify the establishment of a racist Jewish state. It would appear that its attempts to defend the indefensible are coming apart at the seams. Those who deny the genocide in Gaza are no better than those who deny the Nazi holocaust.

Zionism, like Nazism and Apartheid belongs in the dustbin of history.  It is based on the subjugation of the other and it is to be hoped that Jews outside Israel will shake off the lobby and its rabbinical clique and join the human race again.

Tony Greenstein

Posted by at 1 comment:
Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)