Showing posts with label Labour Together. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Labour Together. Show all posts

23 June 2026

Good Riddance to the Most Hated Prime Minister in British History

 Starmer’s Legacy Will Be That He Supplied Weapons to and Defended Israel’s Genocide in Gaza Whilst Destroying Civil Liberties in Britain


Mehdi Hassan Interviews Owen Jones About His Initial Support for Starmer & What Burnham Represents

You will forgive me if I can’t help gloating at the fall of the most amoral, unprincipled liar to have darkened the doors of No. 10. Compare to Starmer even Liz ‘Lettuce’ Truss and Boris Johnson smell like roses.

Even in his resignation speech Starmer couldn’t help but lie. He claimed to have ripped out the poison of anti-Semitism from the Labour Party whereas what he did was to expel the supporters of the Palestinians, opponents of Zionism and the Genocide that he helped enable.

I Hate Keir Starmer

Starmer managed to expel a record number of Jews, anti-Zionist and anti-racist Jews of course. Being Jewish in the Labour Party meant you were five times more likely to be expelled than non Jews. This was how Starmer fought ‘anti-Semitism’.

Underneath the rhetoric, Starmer was an anti-Semite. Jews were there to legitimise British imperialism. Anti-Zionist Jews were invisible as they didn’t suit his foreign policy agenda. Anti-Semitism and Zionism have always gone together and Starmer was the personification of the anti-Semitic non-Jewish Zionist.


I am surprised though that he forgot to mention in his statement the debt he owed to Peter Mandelson. It was Mandelson who brought Morgan McSweeney in from the cold and enabled his candidacy for Labour Leader even if he was in the end responsible for triggering the process that led to his resignation.


I thought at first it was an oversight but then I realised that paying tribute to a corrupt friend of Jeffrey Epstein, a Zionist and paedophile, would have been a step too far.

There was also no mention of Starmer’s role in attacking basic civil liberties alongside a compliant judiciary. All in the name of ‘national security’. Like in all police states there is no longer a right to demonstrate or protest. There was no difference between Starmer and Sunak/Truss when it came to the constant attacks on the right to protest.


I welcome the fact that the rat has deserted the sinking ship. It is no comfort of course that Starmer’s successor, Andy Burnham, will be no different. Changing the captain when the ship is heading for the rocks will make no difference unless it also changes course.

The failure of Starmer’s ‘Labour’ Government was not simply because of his own palpable inadequacies. The problem lies with the political project that sees Labour propping up a failing imperialist state.

Despite my loathing for Starmer and all he stood for, I take pride in two things. First the fact that Starmer was the first person to welcome my expulsion from the Labour Party, with a solitary word, ‘good’. One of his characteristics is that he is a man of few words and even fewer ideas.



Like Horatio Bottomley Starmer was a corrupt right-wing nationalist but unlike him he was anything but popular. Starmer’s corruption was not so much financial, though there was  plenty of that, but a corruption of the political process. Starmer came to power through the Labour Together outfit, who hid their donations for fear of what they might reveal.

Starmer also hid the donations he received from right-wing Zionists, businessmen and crooked financiers from Labour Party voters when he stood for Labour Leader. He relied on the rules rather than being honest and open about who was funding him. His cynicism was such that he stood on a left-wing manifesto whilst relying on right-wing businessmen to fund his campaign.

Amongst those who donated to Starmer was

Lord Waheed Alli         £100,000 (he also gave financial backing to Andy Burnham in the 2015 Labour leadership contest).

Bob Latham        £100,000. 

Martin Taylor      £95,000, a hedge fund manager.

Clive Hollick,       £50,000 a businessman & co-founder of the Institute for Public Policy Research. 

Trevor Chinn       £50,000 a notorious Zionist who funds Labour Friends of Israel. 

Peter Coates       £25,000, Bet365 owner. 

Martin Clarke     £25,000, former AA finance director

Paul Myners       £10,000, ex-CEO at Marks & Spencers. Along with Martin Taylor, Myners helped finance the anti-Corbyn group Labour Tomorrow.

This totalled £455,000 compared to £81,400 from three right-wing trade unions, UNISON, Community and USDAW. This is how Starmer’s Labour Party was captured.

It was an honour and pleasure for me to know that I had antagonised Starmer to the extent that he blocked me on X. Clearly my pearls of wisdom riled him.

Alexei Sayle brought out a brilliant video ‘Why I hate Keir Starmer’ which summed Starmer up perfectly. However I don’t hate Starmer, I despise him and all he stands for.

Starmer was a man of few talents with the exception of his ability to lie. Who else could make 10 Pledges to get elected and then break every single one?

The Pledge I loved the most was No. 4 – Titled ‘Promote peace and human rights’. He said

‘No more illegal wars. Introduce a Prevention of Military Intervention Act and put human rights at the heart of foreign policy. Review all UK arms sales and make us a force for international peace and justice.’

Starmer's idea of ‘peace and human rights’ was supplying arms and intelligence to Israel so it could carry out a genocide in Gaza. Starmer denied that there was a genocide in Gaza despite Israel massacring tens of thousands of civilians, destroying 90% of buildings including hospitals and schools and ethnic cleansing, raping and torturing. But Starmer had no problem describing other massacres as genocide.

Starmer never did explain why 8,000 dead in Srebenica was a genocide but Gaza wasn’t a genocide. I doubt that even the worst neo-Nazi holocaust denier could match him.

On 2 February 2020, two months before Labour’s leadership election, I wrote a blog Keir Starmer is the candidate that the Deep State & the British  Establishment want you to vote for’ .

Unfortunately most Labour Party members weren't able to see through Starmer and his record as Director of Public Prosecutions when he persecuted Julian Assange and protected Jimmy Saville.

There is less excuse for Owen Jones who wrote an article for The Guardian 'Starmer can succeed, and he deserves our support.'  There really was no excuse for this as a cursory dive into his record as DPP would have shown he was fiercely reactionary and pro-Police and contemptuous of civil liberties.  I take no pleasure in once again being right but the reason why it was so obvious was that I looked beyond the sound bites and the wishful thinking to what Starmer's actual record was. And incidentally there was no excuse for being taken in by Starmer's nonsense about 'antisemitism' either, except that Owen Jones too had not yet seen the light.

However let it not be said that Starmer didn’t provide us with a certain amusement. The man who proclaimed his honesty and integrity ended up taking over £100,000 in freebies. The highest of any MP. Lord Ali provided him and his wife with thousands of pounds of clothes. Even her knickers were paid for by the generous Ali.

Starmer declared himself a ‘Zionist (i.e. racist) without qualification.’ And he told LBC that Israel had the right to starve the Palestinians of Gaza and cut off water and fuel, before denying he said it.

Starmer was so right-wing that even the anti-Semitic Prime Minister of Hungary, Viktor Orban, praised him.

Despite being a practiced liar Starmer was never very good at it. Indeed he was never very good at anything. His speeches were wooden, like a child trying too hard, with that squeaky voice which  told us he didn’t mean a word of it.

Starmer came to power via Labour Together as Paul Holden documented in The Fraud. He then rewarded the central players in the conspiracy, including Josh Simons and Morgan McSweeney. As soon as the heat became too much Simons abandoned him for Andy Burnham leaving Starmer high and dry. The irony is that Labour Together was anything but together.

Many people have commented on Starmer’s lack of personality or charisma. In a blog ‘Mogadon Man Assumes the Leadership of the Labour Party’ straight after he was elected Labour Leader I saw that Starmer’s personality was a reflection of his dishonesty.

To Starmer truth and lies were mere matters of convenience. All that mattered was choosing which was most beneficial. Starmer settled a libel action with Labour Party staff alleging ‘anti-Semitism’, even though they didn’t have a case, because he thought that that would ‘prove’ that Labour under Corbyn was anti-Semitic. The kind of trickery that lawyers regularly engage in.

Starmer’s lack of charisma was because he believed in nothing apart from his own personal advancement. Starmer was a human rights lawyer who didn’t believe in human rights.

It was no wonder that in his first speech as Labour leader all he could do was invent a story about his father. It was tedium magnified to listen to the same story about his toolmaker father who also owned the factory he worked in! Ironically Starmer’s dad was a Jeremy Corbyn supporter. He would have turned in his grave to see how his son turned out.

None of us know whether the rent boys who tried to set fire to Starmer’s house had something on him. Difficult as it is to imagine, there is clearly more to this story than meets the eye. And the one thing they were not is agents of Russia as the BBC tells us.

Still no one can say Starmer didn’t manage to achieve anything. He obtained the second highest Labour majority on the lowest vote for a majority government (34%), 6% less than Corbyn in 2017. Starmer even managed, as an incumbent Prime Minister, to secure a lower percentage of support in his own constituency in 2024 than in 2019. His majority was halved from 22,766 in 2019 to 11,572 in 2024.


Ironically this was because of the 7,312 votes of ex-ANC MP Andrew Feinstein, who besides being a Jewish anti-Zionist is, unlike Starmer principled.

However Starmer does have one achievement to his name. Starmer was the most hated and despised Prime Minister on record.

I won’t wish Starmer well in whatever new career he takes up because there are too many dead Palestinian children who might have lived but for him.

Contrary to the view of Mehdi Hassan in the interview with Owen Jones, I don't believe that Andy Burnham represents any fundamental change with Keir Starmer. He has already made his position clear that he doesn't believe there is a Genocide in Gaza.

It's not any surprise therefore that he has been given a warm welcome by the Israel Embassy front, Labour Friends of Israel. 

It is also reported that has had a blazing row with Starmer because he wants to increase 'Defence' i.e. War expenditure. If so we are  in for more of the same but with a smiling face .

I suspect that Burnham will have an equally short honeymoon to that which Starmer enjoyed or rather didn't enjoy. He supported the Iraq War and was a devoted Blairite. There is nothing left-wing about Burnham. His only virtue is not being Keir Starmer.

Tony Greenstein 

Posted by at 9 comments:
Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

13 May 2026

What Does the Publication of Anti-semitic Caricatures Tell Us About The Real Motives for Attacking Zack Polanski?

 Conservative & Upper Class Anti-Semitism Hasn’t Disappeared - It’s Simply Morphed Into Zionism, a Jewish Form of Anti-Semitism

The growth of the Green Party from a fringe into a major party has resulted in the launch of the same ‘anti-Semitism’ smear campaign that destroyed Jeremy Corbyn.

Candidates’ posts were scrutinised for any sign that they opposed Israel’s Genocide. If they confused the term ‘Jew’ and ‘Zionist’ then that was held to be a major crime. The fact that Zionists spend most of their time telling us that Israel is a Jewish state and that opposition to Zionism is anti-Semitic is irrelevant. If you blame Jews then you will be targeted.

The Zionists  drew up the IHRA definition of anti-Semitism which says calling Israel a racist state or comparing it to the Nazis is anti-Semitic. This is Orwellian Doubletalk.

The real ‘crime’ of some candidates was not anti-Semitism but having misspoken or believing the Zionists assertion that their crimes are Jewish crimes.

Their real ‘crime’ in the Zionist and Establishment’s eyes was not hatred of Jews but hatred of Zionism and Israeli Apartheid. The Zionists don’t understand that using children as target practice for the Israeli Defence Force is not something most people approve. A refinement on this is shooting boys in their testicles.

Palestinian boys shot in testicles as “target practice”


Last weekend Peter Tatchell was assaulted and violently ejected from a demonstration which was purportedly against anti-Semitism but in reality was in support of Genocide in Gaza.

Peter Tatchell attacked by Zionists on Rally Against 'Antisemitism' in reality a Rally4Genocide

Peter genuinely believed, his naivety notwithstanding, that this was a demonstration against anti-Semitism and that opposition to Genocide in Gaza was irrelevant. Not so. The demonstration was organised by virulent Zionists for whom ‘anti-Semitism’ is not hatred of Jews but hatred of Zionism, Genocide and Apartheid.

The Green Party have an advantage, in fact two advantages, over Corbyn. One is that they have an articulate Jewish person as leader whereas Corbyn was inarticulate, bumbling and clueless.

The second advantage is that they have the benefit of hindsight. They can see that the anti-Semitism smear campaign against Labour led to the most corrupt, right-wing and racist ‘Labour’ government in history.



Corrupt because Starmer came to lead Labour under false pretences. Corrupt because he hid the financing of his campaign until it was all over. Corrupt because he spent his leadership taking freebies – even his wife’s knickers were paid for by Lord Waheed Alli. Corrupt because Starmer became leader thanks to the Fraud of Labour Together that Paul Holden exposed. 


Starmer made a corrupt and perhaps paedophile friend of Epstein, Peter Mandelson, into US Ambassador and then lied about what he knew. Corrupt because he ennobled friends of paedophiles like Matthew Doyle and Mike Katz, Chair of the Jewish Labour Movement, a Zionist group which nurtured paedophiles in its ranks  including Ivor  Caplin, its former chair and Liron Velleman, former policy officer and councillor.

The consequence of the false anti-Semitism smears against Corbyn were the rise of a Labour leadership which was racist to the core. Shabana Mahmood, a key player in Labour Together from the beginning, who sought to outdo Reform in her proposals on the naturalisation of refugees. So appalling were they that Tommy Robinson praised her proposals.



Starmer’s ‘Labour’ Government supplied arms to fuel the Genocide in Gaza. Starmer even defended the right of Israel to starve Palestinians and then denied that he had said so.

At the same time the Government introduced more police-state legislation attacking the right to protest. Starmer is now proposing banning Palestinian marches because he alleges they are the cause of the anti-Semitic attacks in recent months. All without a scrap of evidence. And then there was the ban on Palestine Action which provoked mass civil disobedience.

Many socialists have found themselves in the Green Party, not out of choice but because of a lack of choice. If Corbyn hadn’t been determined to witchhunt socialists and had turned his attention to building Your Party instead of stifling it, then we might now have a genuine mass Left Party.

In July 1982 Corbyn was the "provisional convener" of "Defeat the Witch-Hunt Campaign". In 2025 he became the Witchfinder General and inserted the unelected Karie Murphy into a position of power in YP. From 850,000 initial inquiries and an 18% poll rating at one time, YP has now all but disappeared. If Corbyn hadn’t destroyed an emerging Left Party then it’s doubtful that the Green Party would grown. 

Zack Polanski should thank Corbyn for having recruited so many Green Party members. What we face is a situation where the old Green Party establishment and Green Party Zionists such as Elise Benjamin and supported by Rachel Millward have adopted the media’s anti-Semitism narrative.



That is why it is worth taking a closer look at the bona fides of this rejuvenated smear campaign and where it is coming from. The national media have accepted that the Green Party today is anti-Semitic and that Polanski is to blame.

It is interesting that the Media have resorted to publishing anti-Semitic caricatures of Polanski which resemble Nazi cartoons. The Times, Mail, Sun & Telegraph have demonstrated that what they are not interested in is opposing genuine anti-Semitism.

Their imagery has included all the traditional features of Jews like big noses, grasping, leering, lecherous features. All the stuff of Julius Streicher’s famous Nazi paper Der Sturmer .

Reform were first off the mark when their Brighton and Hove branch published an anti-Semitic cartoon of Polanski. The Board of Deputies said they would be ‘raising the issue’ with Reform. This did not stop them from inviting a Reform speaker to their demonstration against 'anti-Semitism'. If it had been a socialist paper that had published an anti-Semitic cartoon then they would have been singing from the rooftops.

However the BOD and CAA did refuse to invite Polanski to their rally, which clearly demonstrates where their priorities really lie.

The Zionist 'antisemitism' march that was a thinly disguised march for genocide

This hypocrisy is why we should treat with contempt the ‘anti-Semitism’ smear campaign against Green council candidates and welcome the fact that so many of them, like Mark Adderley, have been elected.

Having spoken to a number of them I can confirm the fact that they are not anti-Jewish. What they are concerned about is the savagery and brutality of the IDF in Gaza and the fact that these crimes are supported by a majority of Jewish people in this country.

It’s not surprising when so-called Jewish representative bodies like the Board of Deputies and the misnamed Campaign Against Antisemitism support the genocide and attack opponents as anti-Semitic that people confuse being Jewish and Zionist. Being Jewish and a racist are not synonymous although many Jews in this country are Islamophobes like Gary Mond, former senior-vice president of the BOD.

To misspeak is not to be an anti-Semite. Historically Zionists were the best friends of the anti-Semites and not much has changed. The anti-Semites wanted Jews to leave the countries they lived in and the Zionists were happy to oblige.

The Zionist idea of a ‘Jewish Return’ to Palestine was anti-Semitic because it assumed that Jews did not belong in the countries they lived in. As the founder of Political Zionism, Theodor Herzl, wrote in his Diaries: 

The anti-Semites will be our most dependable friends, the anti-Semitic countries our allies.’ It was true then in 1895 and its true today.

But what the anti-Semitic cartoons of the press demonstrates is that beneath their support for Zionism there still remains the traces of upper class anti-Semitism which they reserve for those opposed to their colonial project. To these people, even the most obsequious and loyal Zionists are still not 'one of us' however hard they try. 

Tony Greenstein

Posted by at 3 comments:
Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)