The Chair of Bracknell Labour Party, ex-Cop Roy Bailey Asked for Advice on whether Labour Party Members are Allowed
to Attend the Meeting!!
|
Roy Bailey - an 'excellent communicator with strong analytical skills' - all of which seem to have deserted him' |
At first I thought I must be hallucinating. Surely it couldn't be
someone whom Tony Benn had described as “the greatest socialist folk singer of his generation” engaging in a vicious McCarthyite
witch-hunt. I thought he had died. But no, it wasn’t that Roy Bailey.
This was a New Labour version who had obtained a doctorate in
the quack discipline of ‘criminology’ which is really about control in a
capitalist society and as such is pretty worthless, a reservoir of prejudices
dressed up in the language of science.
There was a
time when people like Bailey believed that criminality was inherited and indeed
Max Nordau Deputy President of the World Zionist Organisation was an ardent believer in such nonsense. He even wrote a book about it, Degeneration.
Nordau was
influenced by the work of Italian psychiatrist and founder of criminal
anthropology Cesare Lombroso (1835-1909), who argued that criminality was
inherited. You get a flavour of Nordau’s ideas and the origins of Zionism from what
he wrote about Oscar Wilde. Nordau’s bio op on the British Museum site states
that
|
Roy Bailey's modest profile on Linkedin. He is apparently an 'excellent communicator' and also 'a strategic thinker with strong analytical skills' all of which seemed to have deserted him! |
After
having attacked the ‘predilection for suffering, disease and crime’ in
influences such as Swinburne,
Nordau argues that Wilde ‘has done more
by his personal eccentricities than by his works.’ Denouncing his dress
sense as the ‘pathological aberration of
a racial instinct’, Nordau adds that ‘what
really determines his actions is the hysterical craving to be noticed’; ‘it is above all a sign of anti-social
ego-mania to irritate the majority unnecessarily’. Dismissing Wilde’s poetry as
derivative, and focusing instead on his prose essays, Nordau concludes that
‘Oscar Wilde apparently admires immorality, sin and crime’.
You can see
why Roy Bailey, who is also a devotee of Zionism, is so attracted to the study
of criminology and thus passes himself off as an academic and no doubt as an
intellectual too. However I digress.
In his
Linkedin Profile Bailey describes himself as a ‘Strategic thinker with strong analytical
skills’. Unfortunately his skills seemed to have deserted him when an
invitation arrived from Bracknell Unite informing him that I was speaking
to a meeting on September 2nd on the Labour Party witchhunt and that Labour Party members were welcome to attend
You can just imagine the reaction in Roy’s mind. He is a good member of Progress and the idea that an EXPELLED Labour
Party member has the audacity to share his opinions with people, on behalf of
an organisation called Labour Against the Witchhunt, was too much for him. This was taking democracy too far.
Almost immediately the
cop in Roy came to the fore. Wasn’t I expelled from the Labour Party as an
anti-Semite? The fact that I'm Jewish was irrelevant since obviously I was
the 'wrong sort of Jew'. One suspects that his first reaction was to reach
for a law book and see if there was a law against this kind of thing.
It matters not a jot that my expulsion, like that of so many,
was carried out by a kangaroo court headed by the Witchfinder General Maggi Cosins and was because of my views on Zionism. As far as Roy is concerned there are no bad laws and there are no miscarriages of justice or bent and corrupt coppers. What
matters is those who got away.
The fact that war criminals like Tony Blair
is still a member of the Labour Party, alongside fellow racists like Tom Watson, whilst socialists are expelled and suspended has probably never bothered Bailey. After all, despite his pretensions to be an academic he is at heart a
simple fellow.
The Police mentality is a simple one. The law is there to be obeyed, not to be challenged
or questioned. The idea that the law simply reflects existing property
relations and that the police and state are there to preserve the interests of the ruling class is anathema to Roy.
The fact that hunting with dogs is now
illegal but Police spend their time harassing hunt sabs rather than those who
evade and break the law on hunting is probably dismissed without a second’s
thought by this upstanding ex-cop.
All that mattered to Roy is that subversive thoughts and ideas
may be up for discussion and, quite understandably, the cop in him rebelled at
such a prospect. As I said in my letter
(below), Roy may have left the police force but they have never left him.
It reflects on the sad state of the Labour Party today that people like Roy Bailey are officers
of their respective Labour Parties and secondly that they feel the need to ask
for advice on whether Labour Party members should be allowed to hear from
someone who has been expelled. I guess
in his studies on criminology our Roy didn’t come across cases like the Guildford
4 or the Birmingham 6 and if he had done he would have dismissed them with the ‘rotten
apple in the barrel’ theory.
We should not be harsh on Roy Bailey. In his own blundering
way he simply reflects the mentality of those who are working to overthrow Jeremy
Corbyn. In so many ways Roy Bailey, with a police state inside his head, is a
good example of Progress and the Labour Right’s intolerance for socialist
politics and ideas.
Tony Greenstein
September 24 2019
Dear Mr Bailey,
I was made
aware, earlier today, of a post on Terry Pearce’s Facebook page. Terry is Chair
of Bracknell Branch of UNITE and they have invited me to speak to them on
September 2nd.
Apparently you
are seeking advice from the Regional Labour Party as to whether or not Labour
Party members are allowed to attend my talk as I have been expelled from
the Labour Party. It would seem that you are treating members of Bracknell
Labour Party, of which you are I believe Chair, as if they were still at
primary school.
It speaks
volumes about the state of democracy in the Labour Party if you believe that
members need permission to attend a trade union meeting. I realise that any
mention of forbidden topics to do with a certain state in the Middle East are
considered ‘anti-Semitic’ unless they are part of a re-education programme that
goes by the name of ‘training. However I am surprised that even a member of
Progress (treat as in Newspeak where War is Peace) should consider that
permission is needed to attend a union meeting.
My first
thoughts when I heard of your request was that maybe you were auditioning for a
bit part in a play about the Inquisition. Torquemada perhaps? But then I
realised that I wasn’t treating the matter with the seriousness it clearly
deserves.
I understand
that you are by your own description a former Senior Police Officer in the
Thames Valley Police Force, one of the most backward forces in Britain. You may
recall A Complaint of Rape which was shown by the BBC in 1982, a savage
interview by 3 officers of a rape victim who effectively became the accused. It
achieved, as you are aware, national notoriety and was responsible for a
revolution in how rape victims were treated nationally.
However the Labour Party is not a police state. Members are, even
under the regime that the supporters of the Israeli State would like to
introduce, still free, at least in theory, to attend whatever meetings they may
wish to participate in.
Of course you
could have attended my talk and if you had disagreements expressed them. This
is called freedom of speech, concepts which are clearly quite alien to you.
I understand
that your concern is that I have been expelled from the Labour Party when so
many racists such as Tom Watson, to say nothing of war criminals like Tony
Blair, are still at large. Please allow me to allay your concerns. I stand in a
long and honourable tradition.
Sir Stafford
Cripps, Attlee’s Chancellor of the Exchequer was expelled from the Labour Party
in 1939 as was Aneurin Bevan and George Strauss. Ken Livingstone was also
expelled before being readmitted and then forced to resign by narrow minded
bigots.
I was expelled
because I am a Jewish anti-Zionist. Like Whites in South Africa who opposed
Apartheid I oppose Zionism. This is termed anti-Semitic by Labour’s racist
right-wing just as 30 years ago people like you argued for ‘constructive engagement’
with Apartheid.
I realise that
you don’t understand why some of us are not so enamoured with a state that
arrests Palestinian (not Jewish) children in the early hours of the morning,
blindfolds and beats them before forcing them to confess in a language they
don’t even understand.
Israel is a
state, not of its own citizens but its Jewish citizens and indeed Jews who are
not its citizens. That is what a Jewish state means. It is a state that
demolishes the homes of its Arab citizens in order to make way for Jewish
settlers. It is a state where Jewish residents of the northern city of Afula
demonstrate against the sale of a single house to an Arab. It is a state where
there is a separate education system for Jews and Arabs. I realise that this
presents no problem to you and your racist supporters in Progress but that is
what I will be talking about.
I am sure that
if you want to explain why you support a state based on racial supremacy that
people will be more than interested to hear your arguments. What people will
not understand is why you should want to prevent other people hearing them.
You seem to
have a contempt for freedom of speech and democracy. It would appear that
although you have left the Police force, it has not left you.
Tony Greenstein