If You Oppose Zionism's Genocidal Ethnic Cleansing Project You Must Support the Zionism is Racism Motion & Oppose My Expulsion
Polanski Declares that he's an
anti-Zionist at the Board Of Deputies Hustings
Dear
Zack,
Your
clear and explicit declaration at the Board
of Deputies hustings that you are an anti-Zionist is to be welcomed. I
unreservedly support your candidature at the forthcoming Holborn & St.
Pancras by-election and I hope that you are the successor to the detested war
criminal Keir Starmer who slithered away like the snake he is.
Whereas
I supported
George Galloway at the Rochdale by-election in 2024 I am firmly opposed
to his divisive and reactionary candidacy in this election.
Polanski opposes 'divisive' Zionism is Racism motion
However
I am also aware that after winning
the leadership of the Green Party [GP] so decisively last year, you equivocated
on the question of Zionism and appeased the old Green Establishment of Caroline
Lucas and co. So the question is whether you are prepared to break with the GP's support for NATO and imperialism?
.jpg)
The Daily Mail's Proprietor Viscount Rothermere waxed lyrical about the 'youthfulness' and dynamism of the Nazis
In
your Zeteo interview
you stated that ‘Zionism means different
things to different people.’ But that is true of any ideology. Do you think
that the Nazis came to power promising to wipe out all Jews? On the contrary
they played down anti-Semitism.
The
Nazis were seen as a vigorous, young movement that was going to do away with
the old corrupt politicians and abolish unemployment. People supported them not
because of anti-Semitism but their economic promises and anti-communism.
South Africa had petty apartheid, which Israel didn't have until the advent of colonisation of the West Bank where there are now roads for Jews only - they don't have signs but that is the reality
Apartheid
in South Africa was not defended by its supporters as a way of exploiting and
oppressing Black people but as "separate development".
The Nationalists argued that South Africa was not one nation, but a multitude
of ‘nations’ (Afrikaners, English-speaking whites and various Black ethnic
groups).
The
Apartheid leaders claimed that forcing different cultures to integrate would
lead to friction and that each group should live independently within its own
territory. This is no different to what Zionism argues. Jews need their own
state.
Israeli Labor leaders Ben-Gurion & Golda Meir. Ben-Gurion was the architect of the Nakba & Gold Meir was famous for saying that 'It was not as though there was a Palestinian people in Palestine considering itself as a Palestinian people and we came and threw them out and took their country away from them. They did not exist,”
The Israeli Labor Party’s support for a two state
solution was posited on the
need to separate Jews from Palestinians in order to maintain a Jewish
majority in Israel. Only then could Israel be both democratic and Jewish. In
the words
of Israel’s main opposition leader, Yair Lapid:
My principle says maximum Jews on maximum land with maximum security and with minimum Palestinians.
You
went on to say that what the present Israeli government is doing is clearly
racist thus implying that previous Israeli Labor governments weren’t racist.
But this is not true. There is nothing that Netanyahu and Likud have done that
the Labour Zionists didn’t do before them. The right-wing Zionists are just
more honest.
The
Nakba wasn’t organised by the Revisionists but the Labour
Zionists. It was primarily the ‘left’ Zionist militias, Haganah and
Palmach, who were responsible for the massacres and forcible expulsion of
Palestinians in 1947/8 and throughout the 1950s.
The
Apartheid structure of the Israeli state, with its confiscation of Arab land and
apartheid legislation like the Absentee
Property Law was created by Labour not Likud. The concept of ‘Jewish’
Labour, i.e. violently picketing Jewish employers who employed Arabs was a
Labour Zionist campaign in the 1920s and 30s.
The
expansion of Israel into the West Bank was under the Labour Zionists. The first
settlements were created under the Israeli Labor Party and indeed the founders
of the Greater Israel movement were
stalwarts of the Labour Zionist movement like Yitzhak Tabenkin, Israel Galili and
Yigal Allon. [See Between
Land and State – ‘Greater Land of Israel’ according to Tabenkin and the United
Kibbutz Movement]
Yes
many Jews see Israel as a refuge from anti-Semitism but as the Jews of
Argentina, 3,000 of whom were murdered, found out in the
1970s, the Israeli state will offer no protection against an anti-Jewish regime
with which it is on friendly terms and doing business with the Israeli state. Israel preferred a billion dollar trade with a neo-Nazi Junta to saving Argentinian Jews from the torture chambers.
Just
as in 1920 thousands of Ukrainian Jews fleeing
the pogroms were turned
away by the Zionists who pressurised the British not to admit them.
Zionism
is not what is in the head of some fragrant young Zionist but what Zionism
does. Jewish or Zionist justifications for Zionism are about as valid as the
defence of Apartheid in South Africa by its supporters.
Zionism
is not a Jewish but a Christian idea. Zionism is the ideology of the Israeli
state. It explains why Palestinian children are called ‘little
snakes’ by former Israeli 'Justice Minister' Ayelet Shaked, legitimate targets for IDF snipers. Zionism, in all its flavours
is first and foremost a movement of Jewish Supremacy, ethnic cleansing and now
genocide.
Yes
Zionism has had many different strands and currents but all of them were united
on the need for a Jewish Supremacist state.
Supporters of South African Apartheid were divided between Jan
Smuts and Daniël Malan. Both however agreed on White Supremacism. The Nazi
party too was divided
between Hitler and the ‘left’ represented by Gregor and Otto Strasser. However
both wings agreed on anti-Semitism.
One
of your objections to the ZIR motion was ‘safeguarding
Jewish people’. This is wrong. Supporting Palestinians and opposing Zionism
does not threaten Jewish safety. If anything increases anti-Semitism it is the
Zionist claim that all Jews support the genocide and ethnic cleansing in Gaza.
If some Jewish Greens are Zionists then far more are anti-Zionist. If you are a Zionist then you are supporting a racist, apartheid state. Why would such a person want to be in the GP?
Jewish
people are not under attack, their homes are not being bombed, their children
killed, their doctors tortured and raped to death. When the question of
Palestine is raised it has nothing to do with Jews. To imply that support for
Palestinians threatens the safety of Jews is to buy into the Zionist narrative.
Israel is not a ‘Jewish’ state other than in a racial supremacist sense.
Those
Jews at the Board
of Deputies hustings who shouted that there is no genocide were no
different from neo-Nazi holocaust deniers. They are racist monsters and should
be treated as such.
The
Jewish racists who heckled you would change their tune if it was 20,000 Jewish
children who had been murdered. Jewish people in Britain are not experiencing
anti-Semitism but a reaction to the carnage most of them support.
Allegations
of ‘anti-Semitism’ are nothing more than a rationale to support the Zionist agenda.
Jews in Britain who declare they are Zionists are holding hands with the
far-right and people like Tommy Robinson, a self-declared Zionist.
You
raised the red herring about someone who opposes genocide & apartheid but
is a member of a Zionist synagogue. You said they should not be treated differently
or made to feel unwelcome. I agree. People who are members of Zionist
synagogues should not be held responsible for the politics of their synagogue
if they oppose Zionism.
Your
second objection was about supporting a single Palestinian state. You even said
that there was ‘something imperialist
about this’. This is untrue. Palestine today is already one state. An apartheid
state. There is no possibility of a two state solution nor is it desirable
since it would leave an apartheid Jewish state in place. What is required is
that there are equal rights for all the inhabitants of that state. What is
imperialist about equal rights?
If
you ask any Palestinian whether they would prefer one state or two states the
overwhelming majority opt for the former. The Palestinian Liberation
Organisation only adopted support for 2 states because they despaired of achieving
a single state. Today it is clear to all that, in the words
of B’tselem, Israel’s main human rights organisation, Israel is a
regime of Jewish supremacy from the Jordan River to the Mediterranean Sea: This is apartheid
In 1919 Chaim Weizmann, later to become
Israel’s first President, stated that a Jewish state would be ‘as Jewish as England was English.’ In other
words its indigenous population would have no place.
A Jewish ethno-nationalist state cannot be any
other than a racist, apartheid state. By definition it is a state that
privileges Jews.
Crispin Flintoff Interviews Chris
Williamson and Natalie Strecker about Zack Polanski
I
also wish to raise my expulsion from the GP, which you have kept quiet about.
It was planned and executed by a small group on the Green Party Council [GPC] led
by Laura Eccott and supported by Green supporters of Zionism and genocide like
Elise Benjamin. It was agreed by the narrowest of margins 7-6.
The Racism of Elise Benjamin – the Green Party’s
leading Zionist
According
to Benjamin the Nakba is ‘Iran backed propaganda’
the Palestinians being too stupid to have thought of it themselves. She also repeats
the fable of an Israeli ‘offer’ to allow the Palestinian refugees to return. Wikipedia’s
1949 Lausanne Conference
dispels this nonsense. There was an ‘offer’ to accept 100,000 refugees but it was
quickly withdrawn and in return Israel wanted a portion of southern Lebanon and
other territories
Benjamin
fawns over a White Israeli woman, Izabella Gandlin who was apparently killed by
Palestinians (we will never know because it is likely that most Israelis who died
on October 7 were victims of the Hannibal Directive. Benjamin never profiles Palestinian
children or doctors like Dr Abu Safia who to this day is imprisoned and tortured
by Israel. Indeed not once has Benjamin said anything about the genocide, starvation
and torture.
In response to an article about Israel’s sexual assault on Palestinian girls, Benjamin reaches for another Zionist fabrication about Hamas intercepting aid and abusing Palestinian women. She also only has words for the fake allegations of mass rape on October 7, not the documented and videod IDF rape of Palestinians.
On April 16 I was suspended. The complainant was
allowed to remain anonymous contrary to GP policy.
Just 11 words justified my suspension: ‘Documented
history of antisemitism, including court decisions and recent terrorism
charges’
On May 7 I was expelled, the reasons being that I
had:
- ‘displayed no contrition or regret (or remorse)’ for ‘the repeated instances of anti-Semitism that led to TG’s suspension.’
- That I had had the audacity to publicly criticise those who had engineered my expulsion.
My expulsion was based on a series of lies. ‘Repeated Anti-Semitism’ was not a
reason for my suspension so how could I show contrition? If the GP wishes to expel anyone then it should be those who make
false allegations of anti-Semitism - Elise Benjamin, Laura Eccott and Andrei
Frieze. It is the Green racists not the Green anti-racists who should be expelled.
I was also suspended for the ‘crime’ of being charged
with ‘terrorism’. Thousands of people face ‘terrorism’ charges today for
supporting Palestine Action. The most recent
Home Office statistics reveal that the average ‘terrorist’ is no longer a
31 year old male but a 59 year old White woman.
The GPC assumed that being charged ‘terrorism’ meant
that I was guilty. GPC acted contrary to one of the most basic principles of
law, the right to be treated as innocent until proven guilty. It is enshrined
in Article
6(2) of the European Convention on Human Rights. I completely understand why Laura Eccott and Elise Benjamin
prefer Israeli ‘justice’, where you are assumed to be guilty and gaoled without
even the pretence of a trial (if you are a Palestinian).
On August 18 I went on trial under the Terrorism Act
2000. It ended on August 21 when the jury unanimously
acquitted me after just 2 hours. They accepted that what was at stake was
freedom of speech not terrorism. I was fortunate that the jury did not consist
of members of Green Party Council.
My closing
speech to the jury was described by the right-wing Libertarian Alliance as ‘maybe the most important speech made this century in
an English court of law’. I
explained why the Terrorism Act 2000 was not about terrorism but about
suppressing free speech. It is something that members of GPC might take the
time to acquaint themselves with.
It is bad enough that the British state accuses Palestine
activists and protesters against the banning of Palestine Action of terrorism. What
is grotesque is the fact that the GPC gave their support to those accusations.
Zionism is a reflection of the European racism that
led to the Holocaust. The Palestinians are the Jews of Israel. Christian Zionism
predated
Jewish Zionism by 4 centuries. It believed in the idea of a ‘Jewish return to
Palestine’ an anti-Semitic idea which assumed that Jews do not belong where
they live.
44% of young British
Jews now declare that they are anti-Zionist or non-Zionist. The GP no
longer needs to walk in fear of the ‘anti-Semitism’ scarecrow. The GP needs to
abandon support for Zionism and become an anti-racist and anti-imperialist party.
The GP has the most pro-Palestinian policy of any
political party yet it is distrusted by Palestine solidarity supporters because
its main interest lies in harvesting the votes of those opposed to genocide rather
than putting its policies into practice.
The IHRA
Definition of Anti-Semitism is still GP policy and you have said nothing
about this. Recently New South Wales Supreme Court Judge Desmond Fagan ruled
that the IHRA:
propounds a concept different from that which
‘antisemitism’ has long been understood to describe and appropriates that word
to the novel concept.... The [purpose of IHRA] is to graft onto the community’s
abhorrence of antisemitism a parasitic rejection of protest against Israel.
The GP Establishment has mobilised against the
Zionism is Racism motion and you Zack have equivocated. It is time for you to come
out in its support now you are an anti-Zionist.
James Baldwin
The West’s support for Israel has nothing to do with
the Holocaust. Jews are the moral alibi for a racist state guarding Western
interests in the Arab East. As James
Baldwin remarked:
But the state of Israel was not created for the
salvation of the Jews; it was created for the salvation of the Western
interests.
The real problem is the GP’s fear of breaking with the
foreign policy consensus between Labour and the Tories. The question is whether
you want to break from that or adapt to it.
Yours sincerely,
Tony Greenstein
Polanski opposes 'divisive' Zionism is Racism motion
Green leader Zack
Polanski describes Zionism as racism
Polanski
sparks anger after declaring himself ‘anti-Zionist’ at packed communal hustings
Israel
lobby group CAA threatens Greens over ‘Zionism is racism’ motion
WATCH:
Zionists heckle Polanski even though he’s gone soft on anti-Zionism
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please submit your comments below