30 January 2026

Holocaust Memorial Day 2026 – Record Attendance For Our Call To DENAZIFY THE ISRAELI STATE

Not One Holocaust Memorial Organisation Worldwide Has Condemned the Genocide in Gaza or Said That 'Never Again' Applies to the Palestinians


Holocaust Memorial Day 2026 – DeNazify Israel

The Holocaust Memorial Day commemoration we have just held is the fourth to be organised by Jewish Network for Palestine.  It also had a record attendance. 624 people registered for the meeting and 420 attended with a maximum of 357 at any one time.

The meeting was chaired by Haim Bresheeth, an Israeli anti-Zionist academic and author of ‘An army like no other’. The speakers were:

Ø Rania Khalek, a Lebanese-American journalist who  hosts Breakthrough News.

Ø Ghada Karmi, the author In Search of Fatima and many other books. Ghada is one of the original 1948 Palestinians, who and Professor of History at Exeter University and author of The Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine.

Ø Suzanne Weiss is a child  survivor who was hidden by the Communist Resistance in France. Suzanne’s memoir, From Holocaust to Resistance – my journey is well worth getting.

Ø Stephen Kapos is  a child survivor of the Hungarian holocaust who was hidden by the Holy Family Church in Budapest. Stephen is a well known figure on Britain’s Palestine solidarity demonstrations who was questioned by the Metropolitan Police about a public order offence!

Ø Lastly Tony Greenstein, is author of Zionism During the Holocaust and a long-standing Jewish anti-Zionist .


Bruce Springsteen - Streets Of Minneapolis (Official Audio) - The Fight Against ICE is the Fight for Palestine

The theme of this year’s Holocaust Memorial Day webinar was The Nazification of Israel. When I chose this title I wasn’t aware of an article by Orly Noy, in Israel’s +972 Magazine . Orly wrote:

Gaza City is engulfed in flames, as the Israeli army embarks on its long-threatened ground offensive after weeks of relentless bombardment.... I urge you to watch the footage streaming out of Gaza, and see what this euphemism really means.

Look into the eyes of people gripped by a terror unmatched even in the darkest moments of this two-year genocide. See the rows of ash-covered children lying on the blood-soaked floor of what was once a medical center — some barely alive, others wailing in pain and fear — as desperate hands try to comfort them or treat them with whatever medical supplies remain. Hear the screams of families fleeing with nowhere to run. Witness parents scouring the inferno for their children; limbs protruding from beneath the rubble; a paramedic cradling a motionless girl, pleading with her to open her eyes, in vain.

What Israel is doing in Gaza City is not the tragic byproduct of chaotic events on the ground, but a well-calculated act of annihilation, executed in cold blood by “the people’s army” — that is, the fathers, sons, brothers, and neighbors of us Israelis. 

How is it that, despite the mounting testimonies from Gaza’s concentration and extermination camps, no mass refusal movement has taken root in Israel? That after two years of this carnage barely a handful of conscientious objectors sit in prison is truly inconceivable....

Israel is unleashing a holocaust in Gaza, and it cannot be dismissed as the will of the country’s current fascist leaders alone. This horror runs deeper than Netanyahu, Ben Gvir, and Smotrich. What we are witnessing is the final stage in the nazification of Israeli society.

The urgent task now is to bring this holocaust to an end. But stopping it is only the first step. If Israeli society is ever to return to the fold of humanity, it must undergo a deep process of denazification....

Denazification must also include the recognition that what was cannot remain. It will not be enough to simply replace the current government. We must abandon the myth of Israel’s “Jewish and democratic” character — a paradox whose iron grip helped pave the way to the catastrophe we are now immersed in. 

This deception must end with the clear recognition that only two paths remain: either a Jewish, messianic, genocidal state, or a truly democratic state for all its citizens.

Orly concludes her article by saying that ‘Zionism, in all its forms, cannot be cleansed of the stain of this crime. It must be brought to an end.’ There is no room for accommodation with Zionism. There is no ‘left-wing’ or ‘right-wing’ Zionism. They are the same creatures.

The process of deNazification must begin with the recognition that Israel does not inherit the memory of the Jews who died in the holocaust. On the contrary, Israel mirrors the Nazi racial supremacy that led to the holocaust.

We must stop bowing our heads in solemn acquiescence when the Zionists invoke the memory of the 6 million as justification for the annihilation of the Palestinians. We must not repeat the slogan ‘Never Again’ without emphasising that today this slogan applies to the Palestinians above all.

The Silence of the Holocaust Memorial Organisations

Yad Vashem is Israel’s holocaust memorial organisation. Yad Vashem’s purpose was never to draw universal lessons from the holocaust. For Zionism the Jewish holocaust was unique and if its unique then how can one draw universal lessons applicable to all?

Yad Vashem’s aim has always been to harnesses the memory of the holocaust dead to the Zionist project and the building of a ‘Jewish’ state. How could it therefore condemn that very state for perpetrating its own genocide?

Yad Vashem was never intended as an anti-racist or anti-fascist institution. It was a Zionist organisation. It has rebuffed many invitations in the past to widen its remit and condemn particularly flagrant examples of Israeli and Zionist racism.

Yad Vashem had no intention of changing its past practice now that Israel was becoming an openly genocidal state. So when 50 holocaust researchers asked Yad Vashem to condemn the genocidal statements made by Israeli politicians, military and other public figures, including Israeli government ministers and Prime Minister Netanyahu himself, its Chairman, Dani Dayan refused.

Where Yad Vashem led, the world’s holocaust memorial organisations followed. Not one holocaust organisation has condemned Israel’s genocide in Gaza. Not one has declared that the lesson of the Nazi holocaust was that the slogan ‘Never Again’ applied to all people, Jewish and non-Jewish, Palestinians included.

When the Los Angeles Holocaust Museum posted a graphic on Instagram with the message ‘Never again can’t only mean never again for Jews’ there was a backlash from Zionist organisations. Their complaint, that the statement might be interpreted as referring to Israel’s genocide in Gaza, resulted in the post being deleted. The museum issued a new statement:

We recently posted an item on social media that was part of a pre-planned campaign intended to promote inclusivity and community that was easily open to misinterpretation by some to be a political statement reflecting the ongoing situation in the Middle East. That was not our intent.

The LA Holocaust Museum promised to ‘do better’ next time. Thus proving that ‘Never Again’ in the eyes of Zionists excludes Palestinians and those that the West considers its enemies. Never Again is only applicable to the Jews.

Karen Pollock of Britain’s Holocaust Education Trust went even further. She condemned the ‘shameful’ comparisons between the holocaust in Gaza and the Nazi genocide.

We should take on board what Primo Levi and his interviewer concluded in an interview in 1982 after the massacre of Palestinians in the Sabra and Chatilla refugee camps.

Joan Acocella, writing in the New Yorker in April 2013 recalled how Primo Levi, the famous Italian Jewish survivor of Auschwitz told a reporter, Filippo Gentiloni, from the Italian newspaper Il Manifesto, that

“Everybody is somebody’s Jew,”.... At that point in the interview, printed on June 29, 1982, Gentiloni closed the Levi quote and added a sentence of his own: “And today Palestinians are the Jews of the Israelis.” 

Although Primo Levi didn’t actually say the words they were clearly in accord with his views and he never raised an objection to them.

Today the Palestinians are suffering at the hands of Israel what Jews experienced at the hands of European anti-Semites.

Comparisons Between Nazi Germany and Israel

The IHRA misdefinition of anti-Semitism states that ‘Drawing comparisons of contemporary Israeli policy to that of the Nazis’ is anti-Semitic.

It is instructive therefore to list a few comparisons between Nazi Germany and Israel today and then ask ourselves whether the truth itself is anti-Semitic.

1.          A good place to start with is Arwa Mahdawi article ‘Gaza must be eliminated’: Israel’s airwaves are filled with pro-genocide propaganda.’ She quotes Nissim Vaturi, the Deputy Speaker of the Knesset stating that

“The children and women must be separated and the adults in Gaza must be eliminated. We are being too considerate,” 

Vaturi said this during an interview with Kol BaRama radio in February 2025, when he also called Palestinians “subhumans” and said the West Bank would be turned into Gaza next.

Elad Barashi, a TV producer with Channel 14, wrote on 27 February 2025.

Gaza deserves death. The 2.6 million terrorists in Gaza deserve death! … Men, women, and children – in every way possible, we must simply carry out a Holocaust on them – yes, read that again – H-O-L-O-C-A-U-S-T! For me, gas chambers. Train cars. And other cruel forms of death for these Nazis. Without fear, without hesitation – simply crush, eradicate, slaughter, flatten, dismantle, smash, shatter …. Gaza deserves death. Let there be a Holocaust in Gaza 

2.          On 1 August 2025 Shimon Elkabetz, Chairman of the Israel Film Council, urged the extermination of the Palestinians ‘it’s just like using a lice comb’. Hitler in Mein Kampf compared Jews to lice.


Gallant on Palestinians as human animals

3.          Israel’s Defence Minister, Yoav Gallant, on 9th October 2023, described Palestinians as ‘human animals’. On October 4, 1943 Himmler had described the Untermenschen in exactly the same terms.

Heinrich Himmler Addressing the SS Generals

Gallant went on to say that

I have ordered a complete siege on the Gaza Strip. There will be no electricity, no food, no fuel, everything is closed.


In June 1941, as Operation Barbarossa, the invasion of the Soviet Union, began the Nazis implemented Der Hungerplan, the starvation of those they conquered.  4.2 million Soviet citizens died as a result.

In his diary Hans Frank, the Nazi Governor-General of Poland, wrote, that ‘we sentence 1.2 million Jews to die of hunger should be noted only marginally.’

Destroying food and the production of food was core to Israel’s strategy from the start. ‘Israeli bulldozers and heavy machinery have systematically razed fields, reducing them to dirt.’ See ‘How Israel destroyed Gaza's ability to feed itself’. More than 90% of cattle and more than half of sheep and goat herds in Gaza were killed whilst more than three-quarters of Gaza’s orchards have been destroyed. A UN survey in September 2024 found that 70% of agricultural land had been destroyed or damaged according to an analysis of satellite imagery.

4.          Rabbi Eliyahu Mali, head of the pre-military Bnei Moshe Yeshivah in Jaffa,  told a conference of yeshivas on 27 March 2024 that:

Today's terrorists are the children of the prior [military] operation that left them alive.... It's not only the 14- or 16-year-old boy, the 20- or 30-year-old man who takes up a weapon against you but also the future generation. 

5.          Tzemach Yehudah Richter wrote in the Times of Israel about Himmler’s second speech at Poznań on 6 October 1943 along exactly the same lines.

I ask of you that that which I say to you in this circle be really only heard and not ever discussed. We were faced with the question: what about the women and children? – I decided to find a clear solution to this problem too. I did not consider myself justified to exterminate the men – in other words, to kill them or have them killed and allow the avengers of our sons and grandsons in the form of their children to grow up. The difficult decision had to be made to have this people disappear from the earth.

And so we see how the ‘logic’ of extermination in Nazi Germany has made its way over into the thinking of Israel’s rabbis and soldiers.

6.          The most popular car bumper stickers in Israel are those urging the IDF to ‘finish them,’


Friendship Song 2023 - Israeli Schoolkids Sing of the Annihilation of Palestinians in Gaza – Public broadcaster Kan TV Played the Video

7.          Israel’s public broadcaster Kan showed a video of a group of school children urging the ‘annihilation’ of the people in Gaza.


Israeli politician says ‘any child’ born in Gaza is ‘already a terrorist’

Nissim Vaturi, said every child born in Gaza is “already a terrorist, from the moment of his birth” and that Gaza must be erased from the face of the earth.

8.          Amichai Eliyahu, the Heritage Minister, openly called for the starvation of the population.

9.          Rabbis like Dov Lior, the spiritual mentor of Israel’s neo-Nazi Police Minister Itamar Ben Gvir, during Operation Protective Edge in 2014, published a letter saying that Jewish law permitted destroying the entire Gaza Strip to bring peace to the south of Israel. Lior also praised the ISIS attacks on Paris in 2015 when 137 people died.

10.    A poll Professor Tamir Sorek of Pennsylvania State University in May 2025 82% Israeli Jews supported the transfer (expulsion) of residents of the Gaza Strip, 56% supported the expulsion of Palestinian citizens of Israel and nearly half, 47% supported killing all Palestinians in Gaza, rising to 60% when a further question about the relevance of Amalek was asked.

What are we to make of this? It is clear that all the holocaust education in the world has had no effect whatsoever in Israel. On the contrary, holocaust education has enabled Israelis to see themselves as victims at the very time that they are enforcing an apartheid system and committing genocide. Holocaust education has reinforced their sense of righteousness and entitlement. Israeli settler colonialism is unique in the settlers seeing themselves as the victims of those they are exterminating.

Never Again’ has enabled Israelis to see the Palestinians as the Nazis and to therefore justify all measures, including genocide, taken against them.

And this is the mark of the stupidity of left groups like the Socialist Workers Party who mouth the same slogans here without ever asking themselves why it is that the supporters of genocide in Gaza also mouth ‘never again’ and what that might mean in the mouths of racists and genocidaires. This why I have sent an open letter to the local SWP/SUTR.

I hope that Tuesday night’s HMD webinar went some way to helping people understand that holocaust memorial remembrance, which does not include the Palestinians and other victims of holocausts and take a clear position against Zionism, ends up reinforcing the Zionist victimisation complex that enables genocide to take place.

Tony Greenstein

26 January 2026

EXCLUSIVE: THE OTHER SIDE OF GERRY GABLE – Praised by the Tory Press & the Morning Star for his ‘Anti-Fascism’ They Omit His Support for Zionism & Israeli Apartheid

The Death of Searchlight’s Gable Represents the Death of Bourgeois Anti-Fascism

Gerry Gable, the Editor of Searchlight Anti-Fascist Magazine from 1981 onwards, died recently. What is remarkable is that all the obituaries, from the Morning Star to The Telegraph and Times were both completely uncritical and almost identical.

According to Andrew Bell, a former Searchlight Editor in the Guardian Gable

was one of the most formidable and persistent figures in the postwar fight against fascism and the extreme right in the UK.

The genocide supporting, anti-Palestinian Jewish Chronicle said that Gable

remained consistent in his efforts to defend democracy and expose the dangers of far-right extremism.’

According to Steve Silver, former Campaigns Officer for the Israeli funded Union of Jewish Students, in the Communist Morning Star, Gable was ‘the most tenacious post-war anti-fascist Britain ever produced’.

The Telegraph described Gable as having ‘waged a 50-year war on British neo-Nazis’.

It is not often that someone can receive almost identical praise from the papers of the Communist Party and the Tory Party. And still they got it wrong. Not a hint of the criticism Gable received found a space in their eulogies. Although one must not speak ill of the dead it is also important to speak the truth.

Perhaps the reason for their praise is that Gable’s work against Britain’s neo-Nazi right not only posed no challenge to the British state but was often carried out in collaboration with it. These tributes tell one side of the story. There is another, darker and murkier side.

Part of the reason is that Gable was a racist not an anti-racist, a Zionist not an anti-Zionist. The real credit for Searchlight’s work during the 1970s when it played a key role in destroying the National Front as a political force should go to Maurice Ludmer, its Editor between 1975 and 1981, and not Gable. Unfortunately Ludmer died an untimely death in 1981 at the age of only 54 leaving Gable to align Searchlight’s political direction with his own.

Maurice Ludmer, unlike Gable, was an anti-imperialist

Whereas Ludmer resigned from the Communist Party because it was not sufficiently devoted to the fight against racism in the working class Gable resigned in 1962 because ‘it had begun to adopt an anti-Israel line’ [Jewish Chronicle 23.10.87]. Gable explained that:

Israel was a democracy and these (Arab) countries were not. I have always supported Israel on those grounds first and foremost because I have always been a Jewish trade unionist.

Therein lies the difference between Ludmer and Gable. According to David Edgar’s obituary for Ludmer

Maurice believed passionately that fascism could not be effectively fought without attacking racism as well; he believed, too, that black workers must play their full part in the struggle against the most extreme and virulent form of racism, the National Front and its allies.

Gable’s lack of socialist politics led to his collaboration with a British state that was racist to the core. This was also why the Anti-Fascist movement lost its trust in him.

Gable’s relationship with the British state and his trading information on neo-Nazis with Special Branch and MI5 in exchange for information on the Left led to a breakdown in relations.

Gable’s Memorandum to London Weekend Television

In 1977 Labour Home Secretary, Merlyn Rees proposed deporting American journalist Mark Hosenball and ex-CIA agent Phil Agee. Agee and Hosenball were targeted because they were exposing CIA activities and the existence of Britain’s electronic intelligence agency, GCHQ, which was then a secret.

From Left to Right - Campbell, Aubrey and Berry

While researching to defend Agee and Hosenball against deportation, Time Out journalists Crispin Aubrey and Duncan Campbell met with John Berry, a former Signals Intelligence employee, a whistleblower, to discuss the operations of GCHQ.

Hosenball and Campbell, had co-written an article for Time Out magazine titled "The Eavesdroppers" which detailed the work of GCHQ. This, along with Agee's work, led to them being deemed threats to national security.

The ABC trial  arose from the government's attempt to silence investigations into its intelligence activities. Aubrey, Berry and Campbell (ABC) were arrested on February 20, 1977, days after the deportation order was finalised, under the Official Secrets Act for collecting and passing on information regarding signals intelligence.

In November 1978 this trial collapsed with token sentences being handed out. During the trial and the campaign that preceded it, the security services had done their best to poison the media via corrupt and tame journalists. One such was Gerry Gable, a researcher with London Weekend Television.

On 2 May 1977, Gable sent a memo to his superiors at LWT regarding Phil Kelly who was active in the campaign to support the ABC defendants. Kelly later became editor of Tribune and an Islington Labour councillor.

The memo confirmed that Gable was working hand in glove with the British and Israeli secret services to smear the campaign to support Hosenball and Agee.

Gable alleged that Kelly had taken part in a PLO terrorist training camp. There was no truth in this allegation but lies came easily to Gable. According to the New Statesman (15.2.80):

The wording of Mr Gable's memo suggests clearly that he was engaged in a 2-way transaction with his security sources... The nature of the official material received and recorded by him suggests that much of it was coloured by phone-tap info and informer reports.  

As Time Out observed, the memo caused those who Gable mentioned, like Hosenball, who had previously considered Gable as a friend, to feel betrayed. (22.2.80)

It is something that people in anti-fascist politics have also experienced.  There is reason to believe that Campbell was also being monitored by Gable.

Brian Gentleman

Nine years later and Gable was up to his old tricks, this time for Channel 4's 20/20 Vision. Gable befriended, and took advantage of, a lonely low-level civil servant in the DTI, Brian Gentleman.  One day Gentleman found himself accused, live on TV, of being a Czech agent.

However the Police refused to prosecute. Gentleman was considered a Walter Mitty character whom Gable had entrapped. The Broadcasting Complaints Commission delivered a stern rebuke. It was also the subject of a question in the House of Commons from Gerald Howarth MP.

The Role of Searchlight

Searchlight Magazine played a crucial role in exposing the National Front in the 70s as a neo-Nazi organisation. Under Ludmer it was an effective weapon for the anti-fascist  movement. In the words of Unmesh Desai, now a right-wing Labour councillor but at the time an anti-fascist activist, ‘Searchlight was our bible’.

Once Ludmer had died Gable took the magazine in an overtly pro-imperialist direction. For years I helped sell the magazine but I stopped doing so when it became overtly pro-Zionist. One particularly absurd front page was the September 1987 issue ‘The New Axis’ featuring Ghadffi, Khomeini, Patrick Harrington and Louis Farrakhan. It was a precursor of George Bush’s ‘evil axis’.

This was followed up by the January 1989 issue ‘The Year of the Mad Dogs’ featuring Ghadaffi again. This fitted in with Reagan’s rhetoric against the Libyan regime. An equally demented graphic on the State of the British Right in January 1989 included Muslim fundamentalists, Black British activists, Arabs a plenty but curiously no mention of Zionist organisations such as the Jewish Defence League.


Searchlight had became a pro-Zionist rag and a mouthpiece for British Intelligence. It is little wonder that the Telegraph, not normally sympathetic to the fight against fascism or racism, gave such an adulatory obituary to Gable.

Anti-Fascist Action (AFA)

It is in his effect on the anti-fascist movement that Gable and Searchlight were most destructive. AFA was formed in February 1985 to take on a resurgence of violent fascism and groups like Blood & Honour, C18 and the British Movement.

Not only was Searchlight trading information with MI5/Special Branch but it was actively trying to split and destabilise the anti-fascist movement. When Zionist Board of Deputies attacked the newly formed Anti-Nazi League [ANL] Ludmer didn’t hold back in  attacking the BOD:

‘In the face of mounting attacks against the Jewish community, both ideologically and physically, we have the amazing sight of the Jewish Board of Deputies launching an attack on the Anti-Nazi League with all the fervour of Kamikaze pilots.’  [Searchlight November 1978]

Guardian journalist David Rose, described by Larry O’Hara as a ‘journalistic mouthpiece’ for the Met Police and Searchlight, smeared Class War as a fascist organisation. Allegations were made by Gable that their leadership, in particular Ian Bone, were supporters of the NF, that racism was endemic in CW, that they were police agent-provocateurs on demonstrations and that the NF & CW jointly planned the Stop the City demonstrations targeting Jewish businesses.

CW were never popular on the Left, their paper was often crude politically but no one doubted that they were anti-fascists. They attracted a young, punk periphery. They also appealed to a section of the working class including many miners during the 1984-5 strike. They were the perfect foil for Gable and MI5.  

At its Manchester conference in 1986, AFA narrowly took a decision to suspend CW from membership until an Inquiry looked into Searchlight’s allegations. When the Inquiry asked for evidence 

Searchlight was unable to supply any to support its allegations.

At this, AFA’s second conference I was elected onto AFA’s Executive. When a Commission of Enquiry reported, CW were exonerated but the damage to AFA had been done. The 1986 AGM nearly broke up in turmoil as a result of the allegations.

As the AFA Report into Searchlight Allegations Against Class War concluded:

Despite the leading role of Searchlight magazine in the affair, and despite many approaches to the magazine for evidence, the sum total of material from Searchlight to the enquiry was nil.  We are bemused by Searchlight's role in this affair.

In the course of the inquiry Gable had admitted to monitoring anarchists. For whom he didn't say. He had engaged in the destabilisation of AFA on behalf of the British state and his Special Branch and MI5 friends. None of his obituaries have even mentioned Gabel’s role as an informer for the British state.

See also my article for the Newsletter of Palestine Solidarity Campaign Undermining Anti-Fascists, Defending Zionism. I was heavily involved in the Anti-Fascist movement from the mid-70’s onwards. See my 2012 book on the History of Fighting fascism in Brighton and the South Coast.

Brighton AFA Letter to AFA Groups (24.6.93) and to Gable (16.7.93) and Gable Letter to Greenstein (13.7.93)

On 24 June 1993 I wrote on behalf of Brighton AFA to other AFA groups warning them about Gable and Searchlight. I referred to his targeting of Malcolm Astells, a member of Midlands AFA as a neo-Nazi infiltrator on the basis that:

‘every time he takes charge something goes wrong: either people get arrested or are led away from confronting the nazis on wild-goose chase.’

I referenced similar allegations against Class War and made the point that when false allegations are made against people

the result can only be to sow confusion and suspicion in our ranks. lt is a classic tactic of the secret state, the purpose of which is to destabilise and demoralise its enemies. It also means... that it is that much easier for genuine fascists to infiltrate our ranks.’

My letter stung Gable into sending me a rebuttal on 13 July 1993. Gable disguised his real reason for writing with the pretence that I  owed Searchlight money for copies of Searchlight that he had sent me to distribute. In fact I never heard again of his legal threats.

The rest of his letter was mere bluster, repeating claims that he had supplied evidence to AFA’s CW Inquiry. In the course of his rant, Gable accused me of being a ‘self-hating Jew’. Gable, also resented my comparison to Maurice Ludmer who had always taken the position that the issue of Zionism should not be allowed to divide the anti-fascist movement.

This was a time when some supporter of Israel, such as Miriam Karlin and Professor Geoffrey Alderman, had broken ranks with the Board of Deputies to sponsor the Anti-Nazi League. Today when the Zionists are holding hands with Tommy Robinson and supporting Genocide, such a position is clearly untenable.

In my response three days later I explained that the term ‘self-hater’ has a Nazi lineage. That was what anti-fascist Germans were accused of before going on to make the point that:

I have always found it difficult to oppose racism and fascism in Britain and then turn a blind eye to racism and fascism directed against Palestinians simply because the perpetrators are Jewish. You have no such qualms. Therein lies the reason for your political degeneration.

Black Activists Challenge Searchlight’s Racism

In July 1991, a coalition of black-led anti-racist groups published an OpenLetter in Labour Briefing that publicly criticised Searchlight. Searchlight of course had refused to print the letter.

This letter was driven by a series of long-standing disagreements, culminating in allegations of racist treatment of black anti-racists at an Ilford synagogue meeting. 

At the meeting Black attendees, were banned, searched, and physically intimidated by security guards. Newham Monitoring Group Secretary, Jasbir Singh, reported being subjected to a body search. All this was directed by Gerry Gable.

The letter represented a major public rift between Searchlight and Black anti-racist groups. It led to the formation of the Anti-Racist Alliance in November of that year.

Black activists questioned the magazine's methods and its collaboration with the state. This highlighted a rift between Searchlight and grassroots Black-led groups, such as NMP.

The Briefing letter alleged that Searchlight had fostered a hostile environment for black activists. Whilst Searchlight worked with the Police Black people were suffering from police racism. Searchlight was seen as the right-wing of the movement.

These tensions were exacerbated by the association with Herut, the political party that founded Israel’s Likud party led by Netanyahu. Although the letter said that their main differences were not over the Middle East it was inevitable that Searchlight’s support for Zionism had an effect on relations with Black activists.

The letter’s authors took issue with Searchlight’s approach to racism which emphasised cultural differences rather than seeing economic and political discrimination as being at the heart of state racism, a term that Searchlight barely recognised.

The signatories also took issue with the equation by Searchlight of anti-Semitism with anti-Zionism given that many Black people oppose Zionism because it is an apartheid ideology. Most prominent Black anti-racist groups in Britain signed this letter.

There followed a heated correspondence in Briefing itself. This clearly angered Searchlight which had always taken care not to print critical letters in the Magazine.

When the Campaign Against Racism & Fascism [CARF], which had produced its own separate section in Searchlight from 1979 until 1990 split over political differences such as the magazine’s pro-Israel stance and its prioritisation of anti-Semitism over state racism and its pro-imperialist politics, they sent in a letter explaining why they were parting. Searchlight refused to print it despite CARF having produced a section of the magazine for 11 years. See Powerbase for a timeline of the split.

Searchlight however could not ignore the letter that was printed in Labour Briefing given the support it had in the Labour Movement and from several MPs like Corbyn and McDonnell. Searchlight acolytes had no option but to defend it but Gable stayed silent.

In the September 1991 issue Ray Hill, a former Searchlight mole in the British Movement, who had become Deputy Leader, penned a letter which avoided virtually all the accusations. He did though insult the Black organisations who had signed the letter as ‘three men and a dog’. Daphne Liddell, of the New Communist Party, contributed a more emollient letter.

In the October issue Larry O’Hara, an independent anti-fascist researcher penned an article which I am told made Gerry Gable spit blood. O’Hara rehearsed all the allegations of Searchlight’s links and work for the secret State. O’Hara, although he didn’t always get things right, had been a thorn in Searchlight’s side for years. Gable had become obsessed with him.

In the February 1992 issue Graeme Atkinson, Searchlight’s European Editor, contributed an article but added little that was new, referring to the ‘hoary old 1977 ‘Gable Memorandum’. That was the best he could do because it was difficult to explain Gable’s admission of working for the security services. Graeme accused Briefing of using ‘knife in the back’ tactics in printing O’Hara’s article. Graeme has since broken with Searchlight.

Finally in March 1992 I had a long letter in Briefing responding to Atkinson and also explaining the political problems that anti-racists and anti-fascists now had with Searchlight. The full correspondence can be found here.


Winter 2015 Searchlight Suggests that the Labour Party expel 'Jew hater' Tony Greenstein
Searchlight Support for the Labour Party ‘Anti-Semitism’ Witchhunt

It was not therefore surprising that Searchlight and Gable would lend their support to the ‘anti-Semitism’ witchhunt of socialists and anti-Zionists in the Labour Party. In its Winter 2015 issue there was an item ‘Anti-Semitism’ which asked

‘How is it that nobody appears to have looked into the background of Tony Greenstein, a Brighton antifascist and pro-Palestinian activist’ before going on to call me a ‘Jewish Hater’.

In fact I was suspended in March 2016 and I was the first Jew to be suspended and then expelled from the Labour Party as part of the ‘anti-Semitism’ witchhunt. The article makes it clear that it thoroughly approved of this right-wing attack on socialists and anti-Zionists in the Labour Party. 

Below are links to a number of documents referred to in this blog.

Tony Greenstein

AFA Report into Searchlight Allegations Against Class War

Black activists challenge Searchlight July 91 and here

Gerry Gable Again – Black Flag – the Brian Gentlemen Affair and here

Spy Trial By Television and here

The Eavesdroppers – Duncan Campbell and Mark Hosenball, Time Out  and here

Powerbase Article on Searchlight

Searchlight 'anti-fascist magazine joins forces with Labour’s ‘anti-Semitism’ witchhunt

The Death Agony of Searchlight Anti-Fascist Magazine

Searchlight & the State – Kate Sharpley

Destabilising the Decent People – Duncan Campbell, Bruce Page, Nick Anning

Searchlight Obituary for Gerry Gable

Jewish News Frazer Article

Morning Star Obituary for Gable

Jewish News  Obituary

Gable Memorandum transcript

Our Searchlight Problem – Lobster Magazine

Letter – Tony Greenstein, Brighton AFA to supporters 24 June 1993

Letter – Gerry Gable to Tony Greenstein 13 July 1993

Letter -Tony Greenstein to Gerry Gable 16 July 1993

Obituary -:Gerry Gable (1937-2026), architect of modern British anti-fascism – Andy Bell