Unless It’s Postponed, My Trial for Supporting a Proscribed ‘Terrorist’ Organisation Begins on January 5
Webinar 'Free Speech is not Terrorism' 11.12.25 Defend Tony Greenstein
& Support the Hunger Strikers
The
webinar held yesterday was excellent. Andrew Feinstein, the ex-ANC MP and major
challenger to Starmer at the last election, kicked off with a wide ranging
speech dwelling not least on the pathetic corrupt nonentity that is the current
MP for Holborn and St Pancras.
Clare Hinchcliff, mother of Zoe, speaking on behalf of the Filton 24
The
next speaker was Francesca Nadin who outlined how desperate the situation of
the 8 hunger strikers is. Five of them have been hospitalised. That disgusting
waste of space, David Lammy, the Deputy Prime Minister, coconut (white inside
Black outside) and ‘Christian’ no less, has refused
to meet with MPs over the hunger strikes.
Andrew Feinstein
The
hunger strikes have forced the BBC and mass media
to at last cover the hunger strike. People need to emphasise that there
youngsters are innocent until proven guilty. It is only because the State has
alleged they are terrorists, though charging them with ‘ordinary’ crimes of criminal
damage, that they have been denied bail.
They
have a right to be treated as innocent and to be granted bail. Their only ‘offence’ is to oppose genocide.
Francesca Nadin Speaking on Behalf of the Palestine Prisoners Society
So
far 43 MPs have signed an Early
Day Motion ‘Palestine Action Hunger Strike’. There are 20 Labour, 4 Green,
5 SNP, 4 Plaid Cymru, 6 Independent (inc. Jeremy Corbyn), 1 Your Party, 2 SDLP
and one Liberal-Democrat signatures. Given that the Lib-Dems are the third largest
party with 72 seats the fact that only one of their MPs is prepared to put
their name to the Early Day Motion speaks volumes. The EDM itself is extremely
anodyne, reading that@
Huda Ammori - the co-founder of Palestine Action
‘That this
House expresses its extreme concern that six prisoners associated with
Palestine Action have felt that they had no other recourse to protest against
their prison conditions but to launch a hunger strike; and calls upon the
Secretary of State for Justice to intervene urgently to ensure their treatment
is humane and their human rights are upheld.’
We
should not be too surprised at the Lib Dems – after all in their incarnation as
Liberals under Asquith they faced down Suffragette Hunger Strikes before
introducing the Cat and Mouse Act and force feeding. Scratch a Lib Dem and you
get a Tory. No one should ever have an illusion in what is an alternative party
of capitalism.
We
heard from Clare Hinchliffe about the ordeals of the Filton 24 and the 6 people
who are currently on trial at Woolwich and the ordeal it is for them. The process is the punishment and they spend more
time in prison vans than in court and are practically denied time to see their
barristers.
Woolwich
Crown Court, which I attended is a fortress designed to intimidate. The media
have been covering the trial with one purpose in mind – to exaggerate the
prosecution evidence and gloss over what actually has been happening.
For
an alternative version see Jonathan Cook’s The
hunger strike is not being televised – nor will the last gasps of our dying
freedoms and
Has
the British public been tricked about what the Filton trial videos really show?
and Craig Murray’s The
Filton Trial.
With
the connivance of the Judge, the Prosecution has engaged in dirty tricks. As
her says:
the prosecution released to the
media highly edited video footage from the current trial in Woolwich Crown
Court of six activists accused of the attack inside Elbit Systems’ Filton
factory on August 6 2024.
While that video has fuelled tens
of thousands of Zionist troll posts on social media, the remarkable thing is
that it is almost impossible to establish what it shows.
In fact, had it been put out
without the prosecution narrative, nobody would have discerned that is what
they were looking at. It shows chaotic fast-moving footage from bodycams.
The first sledgehammer seen is
plainly in the hands of a security guard – as testimony in the trial, ignored
by the MSM, has explained.
Here are some key facts:
·
Every single prosecution witness who gave evidence
about the melee was obliged to change their statement when confronted by the
defence with video evidence which contradicted it. This included much more video
than was released by the prosecution.
·
The prosecution produced a misleading account of
the number and location of CCTV cameras in the factory. They were obliged to
present a new map showing more cameras.
·
The video evidence was left in or given into the hands
of Elbit. A search of Elbit’s premises in November 2025 found the USB sticks of
video in their Metropolitan Police evidence bags in Elbit’s safe.
My
own trial begins on January 5th at Kingston Crown Court and I have a
pre-trial hearing tomorrow (Friday) at which various matters will be discussed.







No comments:
Post a Comment
Please submit your comments below