BBC Delegates Did All They Could to Undermine Solidarity With the Palestinian Victims of Israel’s Genocide
Sky
News investigates slaughter of Palestinian family fleeing fighting |
Israel-Hamas War
The BBC has historically been pro-imperialist and pro-Zionist. I can remember in 1967 during the 6 Day War, the BBC’s correspondent in Israel, Michael Elkins could hardly contain his enthusiasm for Israel’s victory.
Throughout the troubles in Northern Ireland, which began because the Catholic population demanded civil rights after years of gerrymandering, the BBC made it clear it was on the side of the British army and the Unionists.
During the current genocide in Gaza the BBC has bent over backwards to whitewash and exonerate Israel’s military. When the BBC showed Gaza: How To Survive A War Zone it immediately ran into a campaign by the Israel lobby over the fact that the father of its narrator, Abdullah 14, was the Deputy Minister for Agriculture in Gaza’s administration.
Harvey Cook lobbying i.e. threatening the NUJ Executive
Even if this were true, then so what? Even if his father had been a member of Hamas why should that have had any bearing his son fronting the program? The BBC thought differently and quickly bent the knee to the Zionists and their lackies in the British government like the despicable Lisa Nandy.
If this was not bad enough, the BBC then used the censorship of this film as an excuse not to broadcast another film, Gaza: Medics Under Fire. The fact that all of Gaza’s hospitals have been bombed and attacked and most of them destroyed hasn’t bothered the genocide supporters at the BBC at all.
Harvey Cook lobbying i.e. threatening the NUJ Executive
Anything that is seen as sympathetic to the Palestinians gets censored by the BBC management, led by its Tory Director General Tim Davie.
Harvey Cook and the rest of the BBC Delegation Found the Plight of This Child Highly Amusing
Contrast this with Sky TV’s coverage. It did an excellent expose of Israel’s calculated murder of 6 year old Hind Rajab who was murdered by a tank along with the two Red Crescent paramedics sent to rescue her.
When Israel executed 15 Red Crescent medics and then lied about it, claiming that they had approached Israel’s military ‘suspiciously’ with their lights off, the BBC went out of its way to whitewash this appalling war crime. Even when the footage that was later discovered on one of the bodies proved that the ambulances had their lights on and that they had been murdered in cold blood.
The BBC Delegation to the NUJ Conference
The idea of the BBC labelling what happened for what it was, clear and calculated murder is unimaginable. Instead its headline was 'Professional failures' led to killing of Gaza medics, IDF inquiry says. giving prominence to yet more Israeli lies. One wonders if Russia had executed 15 Red Cross workers whether they would have carried Russia’s explanation without comment?
‘Professional failures’ might be used about a doctor who made mistakes resulting in the death of a patient. It implies that the death was accidental, not the cold-blooded killing of Red Crescent workers.
When the Israeli version of events was shown to be a lie, did the BBC come out and say so? Not a bit of it. Its headline was ‘Israel admits mistakes over medic killings in Gaza’.
Presumably the Nazi massacres at Lidice and Oradour-sur-Glane were also mistakes and the result of ‘professional failures’. How can an ambush in which firing could be heard for 5 minutes and when the ambulances were crushed and buried in a shallow grave, rather than being handed over to the Red Crescent, be termed a ‘mistake’?
Omar and Omar - the BBC found their murder highly amusing
This is Goebbels style propaganda but it is consistent with the bias of the BBC over decades of reporting the war crimes of the Apartheid State.
Or take the title of its video ‘Israel admits wrongly killing 15 emergency
workers in Gaza due to “professional failures”
This was not an accidental death but deliberate, cold blooded murder. An
ambush. Imagine the BBC saying ‘Israel murders
15 emergency workers in Gaza.’ It is not something that the BBC and its Zionist
Gatekeeper Raffi Burg could even contemplate.
Israel admits wrongly killing 15 emergency workers in Gaza due to “professional failures”
Owen Jones asked whether the BBC ‘journalists’ were on crack. The sad truth is that the ‘prostitute journalists’ responsible for the BBC’s coverage were not under the influence of drugs. They have no such excuse. The BBC sees its prime duty as being loyalty to British foreign office policy.
These premature babies were taken out of the incubators at Al Shifa hospital and left to die by the IDF - their bodies eaten by wild animals - highly amusing to Harvey Cook
It’s a good job that the BBC weren’t on the German side during the war otherwise they would have described Auschwitz as a ‘professional mistake’.
It is no accident that when the National Union of Journalists held its conference in Blackpool from April 25-27 the BBC’s delegates, led by Harvey Cook and Stefan Cholewka, the Manchester delegate, did their best to block all resolutions supporting the Palestinians.
I was approached by a delegate to the conference, who asked to remain anonymous who wrote the following piece:
Kafka
meets Orwell at the national union of journalists
The NUJ delegates at their conference in Blackpool laughed at the
thought of babies being blown up in Gaza. When challenged if he thought it
funny one said "the more the
better."
These delegates included senior BBC presenters such as: Harvey Cook, who
describes himself as a news reader at BBC radio two and radio Kent.
These delegates who represented several sections, but were mostly based
in London, had spent the entire conference voting down every resolution that in
anyway supported Palestine.
Whenever they lost a vote they would bring it back with a point of order
or vote clause by clause to neuter it. The NUJ is a small union of under 20,000
and is haemorrhaging members. It is well known in union circles that those in
the BBC sections have threatened to leave in block if the union supports
Palestine in any way. Obviously some BBC workers value their jobs more than
opposing Genocide!
Manchester delegate, Stefan Cholewka, said:
" it was like
something out of Kafka's, the trial."
When the NUJ executive ruled out of order yet another attempt to block
discussion on Gaza, Harvey Cook approached them, whispered something to them,
and magically, they changed their minds.
Many times, pro Palestinian delegates were not allowed to speak by time
being called on debate. When one delegate from Manchester spoke to tell the
conference what the pro Israel lobby had said, he was ruled out of order.
This delegate was then intimidated by a member of the BBC world
service, and later by an NUJ executive member called, Nick McGowan - Lowe. (this
is one person not Manchester United's new midfield.)
Worse was to follow. The delegate was then called into a room by the then
union assistant General Secretary, Seamus Dooley. No prior notice was given. No
legal representation allowed. The unions legal officer took notes but the
delegate was given no such luxury. Charges were then brought against the
delegate by (the executive) rather than any named accusers.) The executive are
therefore acting as judge and jury.
One of the charges is that the delegate may in the future write an
article about the conference. Think for a moment.. : a journalist is charged
with, at some time in the future, writing an article about journalists, at a
conference for... journalists...
Opening the conference, union President, Natasha Hirst, had said:
" healthy debate is
crucial to strengthening the unions work."
The BBC's Delegation to the NUJ Conference
An article in The Socialist, Heated debates on Gaza reporting in journalists’ union confirms the above account:
Tony Greenstein
Motion 102
from the London Magazine branch noted a November 2024 letter from over 230
members of the media, including 101 BBC journalists, that criticised the BBC,
Sky and ITV reporting of the Gaza horrors.
Some BBC delegates, with backing from the right wing of the National
Executive Council (NEC), successfully moved to bring the motion back to
standing orders, claiming the motion broke NUJ rules. London Magazine members
agreed to remove the contentious paragraph but BBC London branch still opposed
the motion. They falsely claimed that the London Magazine motion was an attack
on the integrity and work of BBC journalists.
Moving the motion, London Magazine branch chair and Socialist Party
member Niall Mulholland emphasised that in fact the motion was an act of
solidarity with BBC journalists trying to do their job and follow the NUJ’s
Code of Conduct, in the context of senior management pressure and editorial
decisions. Niall quoted from the open letter: “The BBC did not make clear when
Israel is a perpetrator or relay the historical context of events before 7 October
2023.” An oppositional amendment was passed but a significant minority supported 102.
See also:
Fact or Fiction: Israel needs fake nurses to
justify killing Gaza babies
Israeli killings of Palestinian children 'an
extremely dark place in history', says UN
Wasn't it also the BBC who turned a blind eye to Savilles crimes ? Either way, people should refuse to pay their tv licence, make the beeb layouts crimes.
ReplyDeleteIf the public knew just how far to the right the leading journalists in the country stand and what those hacks really think of the people who pay their salaries and consume their odious "product", they might finally withdraw their credulous support. As a matter of fact, the process seems to be well underway.
ReplyDeleteThanks for this post Tony, I didn't know that there are journalists within the BBC actually threatening other journalists to keep quiet!! It was the BBC and their 'journalists', by slanting their coverage and selecting which spokespeople we hear, who gave us the war in Iraq, Brexit, Zionism, Farage, and Starmer, probably our worst ever PM.
ReplyDeleteWhenever I listen to interview of an Israeli spokesperson on the BBC, or anywhere else, start with a lie which is left unchallenged, such as "Israel is a democracy" I know it's probably going to be a waste of time. The vast majority of interviewers are incapable of interviewing Israeli spokespeople appropriately, they allow them to start the clock whever they wish, instead of with the occupation, the root cause of the genocide. They always allow Zionists to dictate the terms of the interview, since they will not stand up to their lies and propaganda.
The BBC NUJ branch cannot blackmail the union. The branch should be censured. If needs be a special conference should be called to debate this scandal. I write as a retired member of the Oxford branch.
ReplyDelete'Throughout the troubles in Northern Ireland, which began because the Catholic population demanded civil rights after years of gerrymandering, the BBC made it clear it was on the side of the British army and the Unionists.'
ReplyDeleteThe British Broadcasting Corporation in Northern Ireland was based there, employed catholics and protestants, unionists and nationalists, and reported for decades within a society wracked by civil conflict between those who wished to be British and those who didn't - can you think of a single controversy involving the BBC and its coverage of the Troubles??
I can - one comes to mind.
When Thatcher's government banned broadcasts of the voices of Sinn Féin. The BBC and other media, got around this by replacing their voices with actors.
That there are so few others, is to the BBC's credit.