The Irony of Zionist Accusations of Anti-Semitism Against Anti-Zionists is that Historically it is the Zionists who Worked With and Had Most in Common with Anti-Semites
Webinar on How Anti-Semitism Complemented Zionism
Please Register Here
Speakers
Tony Lerman, author of the book, Whatever
Happened to Antisemitism? Redefinition and the Myth of the 'Collective
Jew', Pluto Books, https://www.plutobooks.com/9780745338774/whatever-happened-to-antisemitism/
Barnaby Raine, PhD
candidate, Columbia University. Author of several articles, e.g.
‘Jewphobia’ in the journal Salvage, https://www.versobooks.com/en-gb/blogs/news/4059-jewophobia
Michael
Richmond, independent
writer, author of ‘Philosemitism: an
instrumental kind of love’, New Socialist, 2022, https://newsocialist.org.uk/transmissions/philosemitism-instrumental-kind-love/;
also co-author of Fractured: Race, Class,
Gender and the Hatred of Identity Politics
Tony Greenstein, author, Zionism During the Holocaust: The Weaponisation of Memory in the Service of State and Nation
There is probably no Palestine solidarity supporter
who hasn’t been accused of anti-Semitism. We know, because Netanyahu has told
us, that the International Criminal Court decision to issue a warrant for his arrest
was because of anti-Semitism! Any criticism of Israel today is automatically a form of 'antisemitism'. Antisemitism is no longer hatred or hostility to Jews as Jews, it is criticism of the 'Jewish state'.
Zionism arose as a reaction to anti-Semitism but it
was a reaction of a special kind. Zionism accepted that Jews did not belong in
their own countries, that they were a nation apart. For Zionism anti-Semitism could
not be fought because it was inherent in the non-Jew.
As Leon Pinsker, the founder of the Lovers of Zionism wrote in his 1882 pamphlet
Autoemancipation
Judeophobia is then a mental disease, and
as a mental disease it is hereditary, and having been inherited for 2,000
years, it is incurable.’
Theodor Herzl
And if anti-Semitism was incurable, then there was
no point opposing it. Theodor Herzl, the founder of Political Zionism drew the
same conclusion from the Dreyfus
Trial:
In
Paris... I
achieved a freer attitude towards anti-Semitism, which I now began to
understand historically and to pardon. Above all, I recognise the emptiness and
futility of trying to 'combat' anti-Semitism.
Edouard Drumont
The leading anti-Semite
and leader of the anti-Dreyfusards in France was Edouard Drumont whose book La France Juive sold 100,000 on its first edition. He
published the anti-Semitic paper La Libre Parole and argued for
the exclusion of Jews from society.
Yet this didn’t stop
Herzl from admiring him. Herzl wrote that ‘I
owe to Drumont a great deal of the present freedom of my
concepts, because he is an artist.’ Herzl shared Drumont’s
antagonism to French Jewry writing that:
I took a look at the Paris Jews and saw a family likeness in their faces:
bold, misshapen noses, furtive and cunning eyes.
After Herzl had badgered his friend Alphonse
Daudet, a well-known anti-Semite, Drumont favourably reviewed The Jewish State, in an article ‘Solution de la Question Juive’
published in La Libre Parole on 16 January 1897. Herzl expressed his delight with the review in his
Diary.
It was little wonder that Herzl wrote that
‘the anti-Semites will become our most dependable
friends, the anti-Semitic countries our allies.’
Chaim Weizmann
So it has proved. Others went even
further. Chaim Weizmann, the long-standing President of the Zionist Organisation
and Israel’s first President, expressed his understanding and sympathy with the
leader of the anti-Semitic British Brothers League, William Evans-Gordon MP. Weizmann
wrote in his autobiography, Trial and
Error, that:
our people were rather hard on him. The Aliens Bill
in England and the movement which grew around it were natural phenomenon which
might have been foreseen... Sir William Evans-Gordon had no particular anti-Jewish
prejudices... He acted as he thought, according to his best lights and in the
most kindly way, in the interests of his country… he was sincerely ready to
encourage any settlement of Jews almost anywhere in the British Empire, but he failed to see why
the ghettos of London or Leeds or Whitechapel should
be made into a branch of the ghettos of Warsaw and Pinsk.
Arthur Balfour & Winston Churchill
Evans-Gordon was a strong supporter of Zionism as
was another anti-Semite, Arthur James Balfour. As Prime Minister Balfour introduced
the 1905
Aliens Act aimed at keeping Russian Jews out of Britain. In 1917 Balfour
wrote a letter, which became known as the Balfour Declaration, to Lord Walter
Rothschild pledging the land of the Palestinians to the Zionist movement. The
only member of the Lloyd George Cabinet who opposed the BD was its only Jewish member,
Sir Edwin Montagu.
As Zionist novelist A B Yehoshua said, in a lecture
to the Union of Jewish Students (Jewish Chronicle 22.1.82)
‘Anti-Zionism is not the
product of the non-Jews. On the contrary, the Gentiles have always encouraged
Zionism, hoping that it would help to rid them of the Jews in their midst. Even
today, in a perverse way, a real anti-Semite must be a Zionist.’
The Zionists aimed to create the ‘new Jew’ in Palestine
and they despised the gutter ghetto Jew who lived in Eastern Europe plying their
trades and living at the margins of society.
Jacob Klatzkin, the editor of the Zionist Organisation
paper Die Welt and co-founder of Encyclopedia Judaica , held that the Jews in the diaspora or ‘exile’ (Galut)
were:
a people disfigured in both
body and soul – in a word, of a horror. At the very most it can maintain us in
a state of national impurity and breed some sort of outlandish creature… The
result will be something neither Jew nor gentile - in any case, not a pure
national type... some sort of oddity among the peoples going by the name - Jew.
Pinhas Rosenbluth, Israel’s
first Justice Minister described Palestine as ‘an institute for
the fumigation of Jewish vermin’. So damning were these elite Zionists for
their Jewish brothers and sisters that Israeli political scientist, Joachim
Doron wrote in an article ‘Classic Zionism and Modern Anti-Semitism’ in the Journal of Israeli History No. 8 that
‘a perusal of
the Zionist sources reveals a wealth of charges against the Diaspora Jew, some
of which are so scathing that the generation that witnessed Auschwitz has
difficulty comprehending them.’
Arthur Ruppin
The
most important figure in pre-state Palestine, Arthur Ruppin was an avid
supporter of the racial sciences, eugenics and Social Darwinism. He considered
Arab Jews as an inferior dysgenic element among Jews.
When a friend of Ruppin called him an anti-Semite he retorted ‘I have already established here [in his diary]
that I despise the cancers of Judaism more than does the worst anti-Semite.’
Ruppin was not alone in his support for anti-Semitism.
Jacob Klatzkin wrote that
If we do
not admit the rightfulness of anti-Semitism we deny the rightfulness of our own nationalism... Instead of
establishing societies for defence against the anti-Semites who want to reduce
our rights, we should establish societies for defence against our friends, who
desire to defend our rights.
Although Zionists today call anti-Zionists
‘self-haters’ if anyone hated themselves, it was the Zionists. It is little
wonder that when Zionism arose amongst Jews it was seen as a form of Jewish anti-Semitism.
That is why in nearly all the Jewish communities
prior to 1945, Zionism was a distinct minority.
In Germany in 1933 they constituted just 2% of the Jewish population.
During the Nazi era, 1933-9, the Zionists
were the favoured children of the Nazis whereas the ‘assimilationists’, those Jews
who asserted that they were Germans as well as Jewish, were subject to restrictions.
On
28 January 1935 Reinhard Heydrich,
the ‘real engineer of the final
solution’ issued a directive stating that:
The activity of
the Zionist-oriented youth organisations that are engaged in the occupational
restructuring of the Jews … lies in the interest of the National Socialist
state’s leadership. (These organizations) are not to be treated with that
strictness that it is necessary to apply to the members of the so-called
German-Jewish organizations (assimilationists).
In May 1935 Schwarze Korps,
paper of the SS,
wrote that:
the Zionists
adhere to a strict racial position and by emigrating to Palestine they are helping to build their
own Jewish state.... The assimilation-minded Jews deny their race and insist on
their loyalty to Germany or claim to be Christians
because they have been baptized, in order to subvert National Socialist
principles.
When the Nazis came to power
the only group amongst Jews who welcomed them were the Zionist leaders. That was why they were so opposed to the Boycott
of Nazi Germany. They wished to profit from them not fight them.
Berl Katznelson, a founder of Mapai (the Israeli Labour
Party and editor of Davar as well as Ben-Gurion’s effective deputy, saw the rise of
Hitler as ‘an
opportunity to build and flourish like none we have ever had or ever will have.’
Ben-Gurion was even more optimistic. ‘The Nazis’ victory would become “a fertile force for Zionism.” Joachim
Prinz, one of the leaders of German Zionism and later Deputy President of the
World Jewish Congress, admitted that:
It was morally disturbing to seem to be considered as the favored children of the Nazi Government, particularly when it dissolved the anti-Zionist youth groups, and seemed in other ways to prefer the Zionists. The Nazis asked for a ‘more Zionist behaviour’.
Ben-Gurion on Saving Jewish Refugees
Hitler will be forgotten in a
few years, but he will have a beautiful monument in Palestine.
You know, the coming of the Nazis was rather a welcome thing. … Thousands who
seemed to be completely lost to Judaism were brought back to the fold by Hitler,
and for that I am personally very grateful to him.
Nahman Bialik
Nahman Bialik, the national Zionist poet, volunteered
that ‘Hitlerism has perhaps saved German
Jewry, which
was being assimilated into annihilation.’ Germany’s remaining Jews were of course annihilated, but not by
assimilation.
So it should not be any surprise today that the best friends of Israel –
Trump, Orban, Tommy Robinson, Richard Spencer, are all fascists and anti-Semites.
This webinar has 4 speakers on anti-Semitism, all them experts in their field. Register and join us.
https://rotenotes.wordpress.com/2024/12/03/%cf%80%cf%8e%cf%82-%ce%bf-%ce%b1%ce%bd%cf%84%ce%b9%cf%83%ce%b7%ce%bc%ce%b9%cf%84%ce%b9%cf%83%ce%bc%cf%8c%cf%82-%ce%ad%cf%87%ce%b5%ce%b9-%cf%83%cf%85%ce%bc%cf%80%ce%bb%ce%b7%cf%81%cf%8e%cf%83%ce%b5/
ReplyDeleteHi Tony,
ReplyDeleteThis looks like a really interesting, and much needed conversation. I was talking with a friend recently and he started saying something about Jewish excellence, listing great Jewish thinkers like Einstein, Marx, and Freud, and talking saying that Jewish people are all above average intelligence etc. Would that fall under philosemitism ?
YES most definitely. The whole concept of intelligence is socially constructed & culturally biased. Jews are probably more inclined to abstract thinking and theorisation historically because they were not sedentary but a lot of this is no longer true
ReplyDelete"Jews are probably more inclined to abstract thinking and theorisation historically because they were not sedentary"
DeleteInteresting, can you elaborate ?
I had a quick look at one of the links and in the bibliography, the book about Philosemitism in History seems to be arguing against the idea that its just reverse antisemitism.
Would that complete Zionist/Israel fanboy Douglas Murrey fit the bill for a philosemitie ?
Well there is a reason why Jews are proportionally over represented in say the Nobel Prize or as major thinkers, philosophers etc. Because Jews were subject to periodic expulsions, the 'wandering Jew' they carried their capital in their heads. They are not the only people to do so. The Biafrans were much the same.
ReplyDeleteBut how did "carrying their capital in their heads" become "being more inclined to abstract thinking and theorisation" ?
DeleteGreat stuff Tony. Did you catch any of the recent Oxford Union debate ?
ReplyDelete