TOTAL Victory for Shahd - Now let’s Scrap the IHRA Whose Only Purpose is to Chill Free Speech on Palestine
UPDATE: I want to make it clear that although the allegations against Shahd are claimed by the University to have been made externally to the University, there is no doubt that they originate from inside the university and Lesley Klaff in particular.
On Friday the Socialist Labour
Network will be holding a zoom meeting in the wake of Shahd Abusalama’s suspension
and reinstatement
at Sheffield Hallam University. Speakers will include Shahd
herself, Professor David Miller who
was recently
dismissed from Bristol University and Shahd’s supervisor, Peter
Jones.
Sheffield Hallam's racist lecturer Lesley Klaff claims that the
Tantura massacre when hundreds of men, women and children were killed in cold
blood, never happened - a new Israeli film Tantura demonstrates
that this is a lie with interviews with the veterans of the Alexandri Brigade
who perpetrated the massacre. Klaff is no different to those who deny the
Holocaust
After
an outpouring of rage against the suspension of Palestinian academic Shahd on
20th January, the University was forced to backtrack and reinstate
her just one week later on an improved contract.
This
is a victory, not just for Shahd but for all those who believe in freedom of
speech on Palestine and academic freedom. It is a victory for those who have
been targeted by false and malicious accusations of ‘anti-Semitism’ for
criticising Israeli Apartheid.
Shahd was subjected to a racist campaign by the so-called Campaign Against Antisemitism which specialises in targeting anti-Zionists
It
is especially a victory for Palestinians in a week when a report
from Amnesty International proved conclusively that Israel is an apartheid
state. Accusations of ‘anti-Semitism’ are the only defence that Israel’s
supporters have today.
Shahd’s
reinstatement demonstrates that the way to defeat the Zionists is to stand up to
them and not appease them. Of course the Zionists are not happy. The Jewish
Chronicle, a libel sheet which has lost
a record number of libel claims, was its normal vituperative self. Its headline was ‘Student
who praised terrorists as ‘heroes’ gets academic role at Sheffield Hallam
University’.
Racist Lesley Klaff - responsible for the persecution of Shahd Abusalama
After the dismissal of
Professor David Miller at Bristol University, the Zionists began to believe
that they could, with the co-operation of tame and compliant university administrations,
target any other academic who raised their head above the parapet. There have
been a number of other incidents at universities such as Warwick, Leeds and
Glasgow. The Jewish Chronicle crowed
that ‘Miller’s sacking should be the beginning, not the
end’.
Klaff's UK Lawyers for Israel feel an affinity with those who seek to demolish Palestinian homes to make way for Jewish settlers
The IHRA
misdefinition of anti-Semitism has been used to target and harass pro-Palestinian
lecturers. And yet its defenders, such
as Dave Rich of the Community Security Trust pour
scorn on the idea that the IHRA has a ‘chilling
effect’ on free speech on Palestine.
Far-right Sheffield Hallam lecturer Lesley Klaff
At Sheffield Hallam University
the local University College Union branch, gave Shahd unequivocal backing. At a
local UCU meeting last week 97% of those in attendance voted to support Shahd.
Just 1 lecturer supported the suspension of Shahd, ‘human
rights’ lecturer Lesley
Klaff. On Klaff’s page on the university’s website she describes herself as
‘a member of UK Lawyers for Israel, an
NGO which provides pro bono legal assistance to victims of antisemitism.’
In fact Lawyers for Israel is a far-right
organisation dedicated to supporting the apartheid state and Jewish settlers who
have spent over half a century stealing Palestinian land and terrorising the
population. In December 2019 it held
a public meeting with Naomi Linder Kahn, of the Israeli NGO Regavim.
Even the Zionist Labour Movement, which spearheaded the Campaign Against Corbyn has drawn the line at Regavim - not so Lesley Klaff
Regavim is a racist far-Right Israeli
organisation which uses Israeli law, over which Palestinians have no say, to
speed up the evictions of Palestinians and the demolition of their homes. It
believes that far from Israel being in occupation of the West Bank it is the other
way around. It describes Palestinians as ‘squatters’ who are occupying ‘Jewish land’.
Opposition to Zionism, and before the Holocaust 90% of Jews were anti-Zionist, is now 'antisemitic' according to Lesley Klaff
Regavim
was founded in 2006 by Bezalel
Smotrich, a far-right settler member of the Knesset who describes himself
as a ‘proud
homophobe’. In 2006 he organised
the ‘Beast Parade’ in Jerusalem comparing gays to beasts (though he did say
that unlike gays, the animals that took part were innocent). More recently he
has said
that Jerusalem’s Gay Pride demonstration
triggered the COVID pandemic in Israel!
Regavim
is the organisation that UKLFI and Lesley Klaff, who like Keir Starmer is a ‘human
rights lawyer’ was happy to invite to speak to them.
Amongst Smotrich’s
contributions to co-existence in Israel/Palestine he advocated the separation
of Arab and Jewish women giving birth in hospitals tweeting
that
"It's only natural my
wife would not want to lie next to someone who just gave birth to a baby that
might murder her baby in another 20 years,"
The Zionist Jewish Chronicle doesn't take kindly to Shahd's reinstatement
Regavim also supports the openly fascist Lehava organisation in Israel which openly supports and organises physical attacks on Palestinians who have friendships with Jewish Israelis. Its leader Benzi Gopstein has called for the burning down of churches and mosques. Its campaign against miscegenation (sexual relations between Jews and Arabs) is reminiscent of the Nuremberg Laws which outlawed sexual relations between Jews and ‘Aryans’.
Rubbing shoulders with
Lesley Klaff at UKLFI is none other than Daniel Berke, who is an advisor and solicitor for
none other than that apostle for racial harmony, Tommy Robinson as well as Jonathan
Hoffman, the linkman between far-Right Zionists and fascist groups like the EDL
and Britain First,. No doubt Klaff’s work is cut out explaining the
significance of human rights to these people!
Sharon Klaff - with Paul Besser of Britain First and Jonathan Hoffman
Another member of UKLFI
is Robert
Festenheim, a far-right Zionist who is another ‘advisor’ to Tommy Robinson.
Lesley Klaff has no problem working with Regavim, which was founded by an extreme racist and homophobe
Lesley Klaff is believed
to be the sister-in-law of Sharon
Klaff another far-right Zionist and an open supporter of both Pegida UK and
Tommy Robinson. The Klaffs originate from South Africa where the political
climate under Apartheid was more hospitable. Even there though they stood out
as political oddities. “We
dressed in black and khaki and the other Jewish youth movements called us Nazi
Jews” boasted
Annette Rosenberg, a contemporary of Klaff.
In the first world war Klaffs’
Grandfather was interned by the
South African Government on suspicion of being a pro-German agent and a grave
threat to national security.
Klaff’s father was the escort for
Ze’ev Jabotinsky, the founder of Revisionist Zionism and Herut, which Albert
Einstein and Hannah Arendt described
in a letter to the New York Times of 4th December 1948 as
‘a political party closely
akin in its organisation, methods,
political philosophy and social appeal to the Nazi and Fascist parties’
Beitar the Revisionist Zionist Group Modelled on the Hitler Youth
Its a scandal that openly racist organisations should have been able to secure the suspension of a
vulnerable Palestinian lecturer from Gaza by making baseless and false
accusations of anti-Semitism.
The decision of Sheffield Hallam to
suspend Shahd on the basis of accusations from racists external to the university is like
suspending a Black or Muslim lecturer because a member of the BNP or National
Front gas taken exception to them. If Sheffield Hallam is serious about its
commitment to anti-racism then it needs to do two things:
i.
Suspend
Lesley Klaff until an inquiry unearths the full facts behind the malicious allegations
made against Shahd. Although the university is claiming that the allegations against Shahd were made externally (which in itself raises questions) there is no doubt that their origin was internal to the university itself.
ii.
To
immediately suspend the use of the IHRA misdefinition of anti-Semitism pending vote by all academic staff. As Geoffrey Robertson
QC, Britain’s leading human rights barrister said,
it is ‘not fit for purpose.’
Most universities in Britain have
only adopted the IHRA because they were threatened
with a cut in their funding by Gavin Williamson, the former Education
Secretary. Apparently the government was worried about anti-Semitism on campus.
It should be obvious, even to the most stupid university administrator, that a government whose Border and Nationalities Bill is making the lifestyle of Travellers and Gypsies a criminal offence, which is threatening millions of Black and Muslim Britons with a potential loss of citizenship and which is seeking to push refugees in the Channel back away from the coast, to say nothing of the Windrush Scandal is not interested in opposing racism.
The Tories concern
over ‘anti-Semitism’ has nothing to do with the safety of British Jews. Their
sole concern is their strategic and military relationship with the State of
Israel. And if vulnerable Palestinians like Shahd pay the price for exercising
their right to freedom speech then that is a price that is deemed worth paying.
Tony
Greenstein
well done Shahd for fighting back and exposing Lesley Klaff
ReplyDeleteFriday meeting link doesn't work (as you probably know by now)
ReplyDeleteIt does now! The one in the email forwarded to blogger
ReplyDeleteKlaff is a rum'un and no mistake. In 2020 she co-wrote with Bernard Harrison a long article (https://fathomjournal.org/in-defence-of-the-ihra-definition/?highlight=lesley%20klaff) in which it is claimed "the authors successfully show that that which the [IHRA] Definition characterises as antisemitic is indeed so". The final paragraph is quite chilling for anyone supporting human rights (summary: broaden the definition further and introduce it into British statute law):
ReplyDelete"It seems, then, that criticism one treads on ice as thin and as infirm as that trodden by criticism two. The IHRA Definition was not designed as a legal instrument, and in no jurisdiction has it been adopted in that role. It remains what it was designed to be: a means of clarifying, for the benefit of governments and administrators at all levels, what kinds of activity are to be considered antisemitic and why. It is possible – but that is a longer story – that some kinds of antisemitism are not caught by the Definition. But there seems little doubt, for the reasons offered above, that what it does characterise as antisemitic is indeed so. And there seems little doubt, either, that ample means already exist in British statute law for giving legal effect to the clarifications it offers."
Good result. Thanks for reporting it.
ReplyDelete