Not only is Trump a Narcissist, a Zionist, a Clown and a Rapist but he is a Sadist too
In this article in The
Intercept we learn that one more achievement of the, hopefully, one-term
President Trump, is to restart Federal executions. In the United States not
only individual states but the Federal Government carries out executions.
Except that until now there had not been an execution in 17 years.
The last person was executed in 2003 under George
Bush’s administration and before that under Clinton. It was Bill Clinton’s crime bill in 1994 and his 1996 Effective
Death Penalty Act which mandated the disregarding of errors in the courts
below, such as the exclusion of Black jurors. Clinton himself had won the
Presidency on the back of executing 3 men in his native Arkansas. This is the
man whom Tony Blair found so congenial.
The death penalty in civil society is an act of
barbarism, designed to instil terror in the poor and working class. It is almost unheard
of for rich white men to be executed in America. It and the prison system is
the only place where Black men are overrepresented. That is why the death penalty is not just a humanitarian issue but a class issue. Giving the state the power to deliberately kill people is to give power to the ruling class.
I don’t need to rehearse the arguments about the death penalty, such as the danger of killing
someone who is innocent. In the United States, because of poor representation of Black and poor White people, a remarkably large
percentage of those convicted of murder are innocent. This is a testimony to a racist and corrupt
police force. There are other arguments, prime amongst which are the fact that
the death penalty demeans a civilised society. It reduces society to the level of the murderer. Far from bringing closure to the relatives
of the victim, it simply fills them with the desire for vengeance.
Politically the death penalty is racist, a legacy of slavery and lynchings, inhumane in that it involves the slow and deliberate killing of an individual.
You are 17
times more likely to be executed for killing a White person than a Black
person in the United States. In 1987 in McCleskey v. Kemp the Supreme Court voted by
5-to-4 that even solid statistical evidence of race discrimination in the
capital justice system did not offend the Constitution. In 1991, after he
retired, Justice Lewis F. Powell Jr., the author of the majority opinion, was asked
whether there was any vote he would like to change. “Yes,” he told his biographer. “McCleskey
v. Kemp.” As one of the dissenters
in the case, Justice John Paul Stevens, wrote after his retirement in 2010.
“That the murder of Black
victims is treated as less culpable than the murder of white victims provides a
haunting reminder of once-prevalent Southern lynchings,”
he wrote that year in The New York Review of
Books. Opponents of the death penalty have been deeply critical of the
decision, comparing it to the Dred Scott case, the Supreme Court’s 1857 ruling that enslaved Black people
were property and not citizens.
“McCleskey is the Dred Scott
decision of our time,” Anthony G. Amsterdam, a law professor at New
York University, said in a 2007 speech.
“It is a declaration that
African-American life has no value which white men are bound to respect. It is
a decision for which our children’s children will reproach our generation and
abhor the legal legacy we leave them.”
The argument that the death penalty is a deterrent
is an obvious logical fallacy. I figured that one out as a child. I remember the last
hangings, of 2 men in Liverpool and Manchester in 1964. In my childish innocence I wondererd why, if the death penalty was such a great deterrent why, did
they ever have to use it?
There is only one exception where the use of the death penalty is justified and that is the
case of war crimes against civilians. Those who order or
are responsible for genocide, the mass murder of people for no other reason
than who they are or are not, are making political decisions that whole
categories of people are no longer fit to live. Those tempted to make such decisions should be in no doubt that they will pay the ultimate price.
They are not suffering from mental illness, temporary madness, blind love or even greed. Nor are they psychopaths. They took decisions for political decisions and should be accountable for those decisions. The military in Burma should be accountable for its crimes against the Rohinga. ISIS for its genocide of the Yazidis.
It is the Bill Clintons, George Bushs and Tony
Blairs of this world who deserve the ultimate penalty. Why?
Because that is how society makes it clear that war crimes are
literally beyond the pale. Hence I would defend the decision of the Nuremberg courts
to execute the Nazi defendants. But war crimes apart, the use of the death
penalty is indefensible.
In other words it is those who are most in favour of the death penalty who are most deserving of it.
It is no accident that at a time when the death
penalty in the United States is decreasing and even the Republican state of
Nebraska abolished it (only to reverse its decision) that Trump has decided to
reintroduce it on the federal level.
It is also no coincidence that those who describe
themselves as ‘pro-life’ i.e. anti-abortion in the United States are the most
vociferous supporters of the death penalty.
It is the Christian Bible Belt which uses the death penalty most, led by
Texas. We can assume that Amy Coney Bennett would have no compunction in
supporting the conservative majority on the Supreme Court in favour of the
death penalty. Despite being a rigid Catholic
she voted in favour of the execution of Daniel Lewis Lee, the first person
executed on a federal level since 2003. Coney is a good example of the
hypocrisy of pro-lifers.
Of course we should not be surprised at the actions
of Trump. In 1989 he took out full page ads in 4 New York newspapers calling
for the execution of 5 Black teenagers who were convicted of raping and killing
a young woman. In 2002 DNA tests proved
they were innocent and the actual culprit confessed. Trump has still refused to apologise to those
whose death he demanded. It says something about the United States and the
American people that he is in contention for the post of President when he is unfit to be a dog catcher.
Below is an excellent article from The Intercept and links to a series of similar articles.
Tony Greenstein
Less than a week after executing Christopher Vialva in front of his mother and aunt,
the DOJ announced it will kill Orlando Hall next.
October 17 2020, 12:00 p.m.
“I walked over to the casket and put my hand on his chest,” Brown recalled. It was the first time she had touched her son in more than 20 years. Looking down, she saw something she’d noticed inside the execution chamber. “The whole back of his hand was bruised,” she said. The funeral director said it was probably where they had inserted his IV. “And I said, ‘I know it was.’”
Brown moved her hands
to Vialva’s hands and face. She touched him all over, so eagerly, the funeral
director “probably thought I was mauling
my son,” she chuckled. “I was
thankful that he said he was an understanding man.” Brown’s sister did the
same thing. “She was hugging on him and
she was touching his chest. She kissed him on the forehead.”
A portrait of Stacie and Todd Bagley on the tombstone of Stacie Bagley’s grave in Dyersburg, Tenn., on Sept. 18, 2020 - Photo: Liliana Segura/The Intercept |
Vialva had been
executed one week earlier, on September 24, for the carjacking and murder of
two youth ministers from Iowa in 1999. He was 19 years old when he shot Stacie
and Todd Bagley on the grounds of Fort Hood, not far from the funeral home.
Vialva’s co-defendant, Brandon Bernard, was only 18 at the time. Both were
sentenced to death. After the Trump administration restarted federal
executions following a 17-year pause, Vialva became the seventh man killed in
the Terre Haute death chamber since July.
Even to those paying
close attention, the loved ones of the condemned had remained largely invisible
in Terre Haute. Although the Bureau of Prisons books travel and accommodations
for the families of the victims — and arranges for them to address reporters
following the executions — no such help is given to relatives of those facing
execution. Until Vialva, none of the condemned had arranged for family to
attend.
Brown was disturbed
by the lack of communication from prison officials. After confirming that she
would be in attendance, they did not speak to her until the day before he was
to die. Brown was on an elevator leaving the prison after her last visit with
her son when Vialva’s case manager told her that the Crisis Support Team was
waiting to brief her. Answering her questions in the lobby, they were
courteous, almost overly polite. “They almost seemed nervous. You know, like it
was a new thing for them. Which it probably was.”
By the time she woke
up on the morning of her son’s death, Brown had done as much as she could to
prepare herself. She had even read the filings in a lawsuit over lethal injection,
which warned that autopsies from executions carried out using pentobarbital
showed clear evidence that the condemned had experienced pulmonary edema: the
filling of their lungs with fluid. “For me, knowledge is power,” Brown said. “The more I’m aware of what can go wrong, the
more comfortable I am.” Still, it wasn’t easy to read that Vialva might
suffer a sensation akin to being waterboarded — “that same panic, suffocating, drowning feeling.”
A Well-Oiled Death Machine
Amid a global
pandemic, national protests, and the impending presidential election, news of
the federal executions had been largely eclipsed since they began this summer.
Vialva had been dismayed by the lack of national media attention as the men
around him went to their deaths. After the execution of Lezmond Mitchell on August 26, he wrote to a friend that
they had mentioned him on the CNN crawl, but that was it. “A man’s life is taken by the government but not even a segment to talk
about it,” he said.
“They are a
well-oiled death machine now,” he went on. “It was sad watching them walk Mitchell right past me so they could
drive him to the death house. Everything was so clinical.”
Vialva’s execution
was a painful blow to those who knew and worshipped with him on death row. “I just want everyone to know that Chris was
the real deal when it came to his faith and being sorry for all he had done,”
one neighbor wrote to his own supporters in late September. As with every round
of executions, a wave of anxiety spread across the Special Confinement Unit
after Vialva died. “We don’t know when
they will pick someone else, but we believe it will be 3-5 more people in the
coming months.”
On September 30, the
Department of Justice announced the next execution date. Orlando Hall, 49, is
scheduled to die on November 19. He would be the second Black man killed in the
federal execution chamber this year. In a media release, his lawyers noted that Hall was sentenced to death
by an all-white jury, one of myriad ways in which the federal death penalty
mirrors the same flaws and inequities of state systems. On October 16, the DOJ announced execution dates for two more people. One is Lisa Montgomery, the only woman on federal death row. The
other is Vialva’s co-defendant, Brandon Bernard.
Politicians on both
sides have remained almost completely silent about the federal executions.
Although it was the Trump administration that was preparing to take his life,
Vialva was particularly critical of the Democrats before he died. The party has
enshrined opposition to the death penalty as part of its platform, yet ignored
the issue during the Democratic National Convention. Presidential candidate Joe
Biden, who was instrumental in the expansion of federal death row but now
claims to disavow capital punishment, has said nothing about the executions.
Neither has vice presidential candidate Kamala Harris, despite touting her
opposition to the death penalty.
Two days before
Vialva’s execution, as the DOJ prepared to kill William LeCroy on September 22,
activists with Death
Penalty Action gathered for a press conference in front of the United
States Capitol in Washington, D.C. Faith leaders were present from different
religious denominations. They spoke out against the executions and called out
Attorney General Bill Barr, who was scheduled to be honored the next day during
the National Catholic Prayer Breakfast.
The event featured
New York Rep. Adriano Espaillat, the sponsor of a bill to abolish the federal
death penalty introduced last summer. A parallel bill was brought forward by
Rep. Ayanna Pressley, who last year called for an investigation into the
federal government’s lethal injection plans.
“We’ve gotta be louder about this,” Espaillat said. He
echoed a new report by the Death Penalty Information Center, linking the
death penalty to the legacy of slavery and lynching in the United States. Not
only are Black people overrepresented on death row today, he said, “defendants convicted of killing white
victims are executed at a rate 17 times greater than those convicted of killing
Black victims.” Indeed, of the seven men executed in Terre Haute, almost
all of their victims were white.
Later that day,
activists under the banner of the Terre Haute Death Penalty Resistance returned to
the grassy field next to the Dollar General on Route 63, directly across from
the federal penitentiary. Ashley Kincaid Eve, a lawyer and activist from
Indianapolis, was leading the protests that week, although she still harbored
hope that Vialva’s execution would not go forward. Eve had developed a close
friendship with Vialva after he saw her on the news and wrote to thank her for
caring enough to protest the executions. “We
are here because people decided that we are trash to be thrown in the
dumpster,” he said in his first letter. But over the years,
“I have listened
to men sing the praises of their children, mourn the loss of their loved ones,
talk about their ambitions while knowing they will not come to fruition,
discuss their spiritual journey, and lament the decisions that put them here.”
Eve had previously
spearheaded a successful lawsuit against the Indiana State Police, who barred the
activists from the area across from the prison during the first round of
executions in July. It was one of many ways in which authorities tried to
tightly control what the public was able to see. In a nod to the First
Amendment, the BOP had designated two spots in the fields along Route 63 for
protesters on either side of the issue, but required participants to be
transported by government buses hours in advance. No phones or electronic
devices would be allowed. In the briefings for press before each execution, BOP
spokespersons have repeatedly told reporters that no one has shown up to
protest the executions.
While in prison Vialva crocheted a number of stuffed animals and blankets for his mother, Lisa Brown, which she keeps at her home in Killeen, Texas - 16.9.20. |
BOP officials have
been tight-lipped with journalists. For media witnesses, who have waited long
hours on prison grounds to carry out their assignments, there are few
explanations or updates. In contrast to death penalty states where prison
officials routinely provide detailed descriptions about the last meals of the
condemned, the BOP refuses to disclose even such trivial information. But
Vialva had told Eve about LeCroy’s last meal. He had asked for KFC but his
request had been rejected, she told me. The bones in the chicken presented a
security risk, he was told. So, like Vialva, he requested Pizza Hut instead.
Victims on Both Sides
LeCroy’s execution
went later than planned. Although it was scheduled for 6 p.m., he was not
declared dead until after 9 p.m. LeCroy had been sentenced to death for the
brutal killing of a nurse practitioner named Joann Lee Tiesler. Court records
showed that LeCroy, who had a history of mental illness, said he had killed her
in the mistaken belief that she was a former babysitter who had molested him
when he was a child. In a clemency application for LeCroy, according to the Atlanta Journal-Constitution, his
attorneys pointed out that LeCroy’s own family had lost his brother, a Georgia
state trooper, to murder in 2010. “The pain and sorrow felt by the LeCroy
family at potentially losing two of their sons is unimaginable,” they wrote.
Tiesler was engaged
to be married when she was murdered; her fiancĂ© witnessed LeCroy’s execution,
as did her father, Tom Tiesler. In a written statement, Tom Tiesler
thanked Trump and Barr for restarting federal executions. LeCroy “died a peaceful death in contrast to the
stark horror he imposed on my daughter Joann,” he wrote.
“He was allowed to live nineteen years longer than
Joann, with us taxpayers paying for his food, shelter and medical care. I am
unaware that he ever showed any remorse for his evil actions, his life of
crime, or the horrific burden he caused Joann’s loved ones.”
LeCroy had prepared a
lengthy statement of his own, which he mailed to Sister Barbara Battista, a
Catholic nun who served as his spiritual adviser, to read at his execution. But
it did not arrive on time. Two days later, on the morning of Vialva’s
execution, Battista brought the letter to a press conference outside the Dollar
General. It began with a quote from the poet W. H. Auden. “‘Those to whom evil is done do evil in
return,’” it read. This was not an excuse, he said.
“Yet it describes many of us human beings in our
primitive emotional states as children. It is a fact that some abuse —
physical, emotional, and/or sexual — can stunt emotional growth. … We feel that
we are what happened to us, that we cannot be that which we desire to become.
And we lash out in anger. … We did things that we were unable to take back,
harmed another human being, ourselves, and so many who loved us.”
Activists stood
behind Battista as she read the letter, holding signs and wearing masks. They
were joined by Lisa Brown. In a purple mask, a black headscarf, and a gold Star
of David pendant, she came forward after Battista was done, to say a few words
about her son. “This is really hard,”
she said, her voice breaking. “This is
the first venue that I’ve had in which I could say to Todd and Stacie’s family,
I am so sorry for your loss. I’ve never been able to tell you that because I
was told I could not have access to you.”
Brown emphasized that
her son was remorseful for his crime. But she also shared a story she told me
the first time we spoke. Like LeCroy’s family, she had experienced the legal
system from both sides of the courtroom. “In
2009, my daughter’s ex-husband attempted to murder her,” she said.
“He bludgeoned her in the head with a hammer, poured
gasoline over her and set her on fire. She survived with second and third
degree burns over 80 percent of her body. And she forgave her attacker shortly
after it happened. … And she taught me that I had to forgive. And it changed my
life from being in a perpetual state of victimhood to a life that I can put
that behind me, and see that there is peace in that.”
Later that day, as
Brown reported to the parking lot of the Vigo County Sheriff’s Office, Eve
returned to the same spot at the Dollar General to set up for the protest against Vialva’s execution. She had said goodbye to
Vialva on the phone the night before, hoping to convince him to let her file a
last-minute challenge to his execution. But he asked her not to. Everyone on
death row had seen what happened to Daniel Lewis Lee, the first man to be
executed in Terre Haute this year: Lee was lying on the gurney for four hours
before the government took his life, as lawyers fought over his fate. Vialva
did not want that to happen to him.
“He’s lost faith in our courts and I don’t blame him,” Eve said. “I’ve lost faith in our justice system. But I
haven’t lost faith in humanity.” In the last several weeks, she had heard
from people all over the world who were moved by his story.
It was just after 6
p.m. when Eve introduced the final speaker, a woman named Katie, who had
traveled to Terre Haute from Minnesota. “I
don’t know Chris personally,” Katie said. But she knew Vialva’s younger
sister, Audrey. The two had met at a retreat for survivors of domestic
violence, where Audrey had shared the story of how her ex-husband tried to kill
her. “I am at risk of being a murder
victim,” Katie said. Before going to prison for violating a restraining
order, her own abuser beat, choked, and sexually assaulted her, she said. He is
no longer incarcerated — and he could still kill her one day, she said. But she
does not want his life.
Katie pointed to the
penitentiary complex behind her. “Do you
think that what’s going on behind us right now is going to save my life?”
she asked. “Do you think he knows that
this is happening and it’s going to deter him from anything he wants to do?
It’s not.”
At 6:48 p.m., a BOP spokesperson
sent out an email to reporters. “Please
report back to the Media Center at this time if you choose to,” he wrote.
The execution had been carried out. At the media center, officials handed out a
statement from the mother of Todd Bagley. She said she was
“hurt and disappointed” by the
coverage of the case that morning, which focused on Vialva and how he had
changed. Todd and Stacie also touched many lives, she wrote. “We will never know how many people they
could have influenced for good if they had been given the chance.” She was
heartened by the fact that they were in Heaven, she said. “I know without a
doubt we will have a glorious reunion with them one day!”
Lisa Brown with her son Christopher Vialva and his younger sister, Audrey, in 1988. Photo: Courtesy of Lisa Brown |
The Ultimate Price
On October 1, a few
dozen guests gathered at the Killeen City Cemetery for Vialva’s funeral. His
gray casket was covered in white lilies and chrysanthemums. His mother and
sister sat in the front row. Eve, who drove down from Indianapolis, sat behind
them under the tent.
Vialva’s 11-year-old nephew
read a tribute from Vialva’s best friend on death row. Then Vialva’s sister
Audrey delivered his eulogy. She shared childhood memories: how they would
break the rules and ride their bikes to Walmart; how he would tickle her, play
freeze tag with her, and have water balloon fights with her every summer. As he
got older, she said, Vialva started spending more time playing video games and
listening to music with his friends. But she remembered the time they stayed up
all night memorizing the lyrics to the 1994 song “Funkdafied” by Da Brat. “He kept hanging his head off the top bunk
asking why it was taking so many playbacks for me to get it,” she said. “His memory was always better than mine.”
Brown read the letter
Vialva had written for his funeral. He was no longer the angry 19-year-old he
had been, he wrote.
“If you have written me a thousand letters or only
just sat and thought about me from time to time, I appreciate it. If you came
to visit me once a year or just saw my mother in passing and told her to tell
me hello, I appreciate it. … If anyone here feels they could have done more,
don’t. You did what you could and that is all that matters. So, thank you for
those mercies and for your attendance today.”
The funeral director,
Robert Falcon, was moved by the service. It was not the first time he had
presided over the burial of a man executed by the state. Often times, he told
me, such families “want to arrange
something very private, something very, very quiet,” he said.
“I’ve had services where nobody shows up. … There may
be a representative from the family, a minister, and the funeral director. And
that’s it. And Christopher’s situation was quite unique in that there was about
40 people present. And I’ve never seen that.”
Falcon did not minimize
the pain of the victims in cases like Vialva’s. In his decades helping families
bury their loved ones, he had seen his share of murder victims. He knew that
their families continued to hurt after an execution, he said. But “sometimes we forget that the person has now
paid the ultimate price for their crime, and now that family is left to hurt.”
Five days after her
son’s funeral, Brown spoke to the mother of Orlando Hall, the next man in line
to die in Terre Haute. She learned that he has six children and a number of grandchildren.
Hall’s mother is in poor health and was not sure whether she will attend the
execution, Brown said. “I told her, I want to be able to help facilitate their
peaceful transition through this process,” Brown said. “And she said, ‘Oh thank you, Jesus.’ She says, ‘You just made my day, Miss Lisa.’ That
blessed me.”
Brown has not yet
spoken to the mother of Brandon Bernard. But she feels called upon to support
other families as their loved ones get execution dates. “There are so many more like me,” she said. It is also what her son
would have wanted. Over the phone, she read from a card that was waiting in the
mail when she returned from Terre Haute. “I
know this is hard for you,” he had written. “I would even go so far as to say that it’s harder on you than me. … I
just want you to stay strong. I need you to do that for me. If they do take me
away, then you can let them know how much it hurts. Maybe one day your love
will change things.”
Blood
in the Water - Disregarding
the Virus and Victims’ Families, Trump Rushes to Execute as Many People as
Possible
The
Life and Death of Jerry Givens, Virginia’s Executioner-Turned-Abolitionist
Executions
Are On Hold, but States Are Still Pushing for Death Amid the Coronavirus
Pandemic
The Abolitionists
- A Push
to Repeal the Death Penalty Gains Ground Across the Western United States
Trump
Prepares to Execute Christopher Vialva for a Crime He Committed as a Teenager
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please submit your comments below