1 October 2010

Ritual Violence Against the Jewish Boat to Gaza




Monsters in Uniform - the Israeli Military


I remember the Union of Jewish Student’s response to criticism of Israel. ‘Shalom’ and ‘Mutual Recognition’ they said. But of course these weren’t values that they took on board but as things to counterpose to support of the Palestinians and opposition to Zionist terror & racism. As if shouting ‘Shalom’ is an answer to smashing someone over the head.

So it is with Israel today. We had Benjamin Netanyahy stating that ‘we did everything to avoid violence’ after the boarding of the Mavi Marmara and the murder of 9 activists. Only the BBC fell for that one but then they always did have a blind spot for the violence of the State (unless the British state was at war with them).

The Jewish Boat to Gaza was people by a majority of persons over 60 years of age. Unlike the Gaza Freedom Flotilla it was a tiny, symbolic boat. But that didn’t stop the use of a taser gun, which is a portable means of torture, against Yonatan Shapiro. Although the violence was less against the Internationals on board, those who were Israeli also faced considerable violence, presumably because Israel thinks any of its citizens foolish enough to oppose Zionism and its barbarities deserves anything meted out to them. That is the nature of the Jewish state.

Indeed it is the best answer to the argument for Israel that it is a refuge for Jews in the diaspora.

Below is a Report on the Jews for Justice for Palestinians web site and then testimony from

What really happened when the Jewish boat to Gaza was boarded

Glyn Secker Captain, the “Irene”

30 September 2010

followed by an interview with Yonatan and Itamar Shapira

There then developed a sight which will remain with me for the rest of my life – with the frigate in the background, two gunboats, two landing craft and four high powered ribs spread out in a semi-circle speeding towards us at perhaps 35 knots, with their bow waves and wakes flashing in the sunshine. It was surreal, it was like an action movie, and entranced by the sight I had to remind myself this was actually happening – this overwhelming force for a 9.7 metre 40 yr. old boat, the majority of its Jewish occupants over 60 years old, with no weapons and a publicized policy of passive resistance.

The next we knew there were two ribs very close alongside with the commander on a megaphone again warning us of the dangers if they boarded us. I reiterated our legal rights, and for what it was worth I accelerated, just to make a point that outpacing them was fantasy. Then as planned Itamar addressed the commandos in Hebrew and English, calling on them not to obey the orders to take actions which are illegal under international law. The ribs closed in, and the boarding commenced.

All the crew and passengers (apart from myself as I was steering) held hands.They boarded us simultaneously from both sides. At that moment we cut the engines and sat over the access points to the cut offs to prevent them restarting the engines. The wheel is on the starboard side of the boat. I was surrounded by three commandos, I held on to the wheel as hard as I could. It reminded me of being on violent picket lines with the police trying to break through. One grabbed my left arm, another my right arm. The third stood by with a Tazer gun. After a struggle they managed to prize my hands from the wheel and threw me down on the floor. I managed to crawl behind them and remove the engine starter keys but one of them saw me and prized the keys from my hands.

On the opposite side of the cockpit Yonatan Shapira and his brother Itamar had been identified by the IDF commander in charge. He sought to separate them from the others. Yonatan clasped Rami in a hug to prevent himself being removed. The senior officer then moved one sideYonatan’s lifejacket covering his left breast, placed a Tazer gun in contact with his clothing and fired it directly into his heart. Yonatan let out a dreadful scream and the force of the Tazer caused him to lose control of his muscles. He was pulled off Rami and across the cockpit to the middle. He was then hit twice more by the Tazer gun, screaming out again. Both he and Itamar were forcefully pulled off our boat onto the IDF rib on port side.They were driven at very high speed over the waters, which had now become moderately rough (the wind had increased to a F4) and it would have been very uncomfortable especially for Yonatan still recovering from the Tazer shocks. They were taken to the frigate where they were treated normally, then to shore and released on bail without charges.

Meanwhile I had turned off the fuel supply to the engines. After some time (the engines only burn 1 1/2 litres per hour) when the fuel in the pipes had been used up the port engine started to fail. (The starboard fuel shut-off failed to work). After many attempts to restart the engine the IDF took the boat in tow. The boat is designed to go through the water at a maximum speed of about 8 knots. They towed us through the rough waters at 12 – 14 knots. The boat was bouncing about violently, it was dangerous for the remaining passengers and crew, including Reuvan, our 82 year old holocaust survivor. We all sustained bruises and the passage to Ashdod was exhausting. There was something like eight commandos on the boat in addition to ourselves so it was grossly overloaded. It was surprising that the boat did not begin to break up, the whole structure was groaning and making cracking sounds. It was clear that they intended to seriously mistreat the boat. During the passage they tore down all the banners and flags – including the red ensign (the UK flag) which legally has to be displayed in all foreign waters.

As a gesture of defiance I decided to cook lunch! Not easy in the circumstance but I managed to produce omlett (with garlic) sandwiches which Reuvan, Lillian and I think Eli and I shared. Whilst in the galley I took the opportunity of chucking out of the window the carving knife, the bread knife, a chisel and two hammers from the tool box, remembering that similar items had been photographed as evidence of weapons on previous boats.

I’d like to point out that in the USA it is illegal for the police or the army to fire Tazers directly into the heart as there have been a number of cases of heart failure and death as a result of such targeting.

The fact that Yonatan was released without charge makes it very clear that the use of the Tazer on him was purely malicious.

Contrary to IDF reports, there was therefore, considerable resistance, be it non-violent, to the IDF’s illegal hijacking of our boat, and there was considerable, unprovoked and very dangerous violence perpetrated by the IDF.

See Glyn’s full testimony below, following the report by Yonatan and Itamar Shapira


Yonatan and Itamar Shapira report

29 September 2010

Yonatan and Itamar Shapira were two of the Israelis on-board the Jewish boat to Gaza, the Irene. They above all were subjected to violence from the Israeli forces who intercepted the boat.

These are their words an hour after they returned to their family in Israel:

“The Israeli media is being dominated by army propaganda. They’re claiming that the take over of the boat was non-violet and quiet on both sides – but what actually happened was that the boat passengers were non-violent, but the Israeli Navy was very violent.

At sunrise we stopped about 35 miles from shore and put up all the flags and banners from the organisation – the boat looked so, so pretty! We then turned south-east and headed towards the port in Gaza. Film maker Vish and journalist Eli took the dinghy and took stills and video of the boat. Everyone felt a sense of excitement as we stood on deck waving goodbye to the quiet journey we had been on. We knew that soon we would be intercepted, so we used the time for briefings. Holding each other’s hands, we talked about the principles of the boat and decided on strategies of how to deal with the Navy.

When we were approximately 20 miles outside of Gaza, a big Navy warship was spotted to the north of us. At that point it was still quite far away, so we held course.As the warship drew closer they hailed us and spoke to Glyn, the captain. The Navy said that we were entering a closed area by an oil rig, so the Irene altered course slightly in response. We then saw another smaller ship in front of them. As the warship approached and drew parallel to the Irene the smaller ship remained stationary. A number of smaller vessels were spotted coming from the east. The Navy again called us demanding to know our intention – we replied that we were headed for Gaza.

The Navy responded with the exact declaration they made before attacking the Mavi Marmara :

“You are entering an area which is under military blockade and is closed under international law.”

Itamar was in charge of communicating with the Navy, and responded by reading our own declaration in English and Hebrew:

“We are a boat of the European organisation Jews For Justice For Palestinians. We are unarmed and non-violent and determined to proceed to the port of Gaza. You are enforcing an illegal blockade and we do not recognise your right to do this. On this Jews For Justice for Palestinians boat are peace activists of all ages among us holocaust survivors, bereaved parents and Israelis who refuse to collaborate with the illegal occupation of Palestine.”

We waited for them to confirm that they had heard.

The Navy repeated their message in Hebrew – then the boats started coming from all sides. Eight army vessels surrounded us – three or four of the ships had cannons.

We called the soldiers to refuse their orders:

“We call on you IDF soldiers and officers to disobey the illegal orders of your superior officers. For your information, the occupation of Gaza and the Palestinian Territories are illegal under international law; therefore your risk being tried in the international courts. The blockade as well as the occupation is inhumane and contradicts universal and Jewish moral values. Use your conscience. Remember our own painful history. Refuse to enforce the blockade. Refuse to occupy Palestine.”

Itamar read this in Hebrew and English on radio a few times as the boats came towards us. Everyone was getting ready and holding hands on the Irene, getting ready for interception. Vish was in the front taking photos and filming the whole thing.

There were more than 100 soldiers on all the military boats around our boat. Two small boats with cannons drew up on both sides, shouting and threatening us with megaphones and constantly moving closer towards us. Glynn the captain stayed calm and behaved exactly to principles of boat, staying on course and challenging the Navy.

The military spoke to Itamar directly and stated that he was responsible for the harm that would come to us and the risk that we were taking by not changing course. We understood very quickly that we were about to be boarded at any moment. The small boats came right up close and then the north side jumped on board.

ITAMAR: As i was talking to the army boat cruising alongside us with some 20 armed, and muscled navy soldiers i was amazed for the thousandth time in my life at how the army portrays the reality to themselves and to us. They insisted that it is me personally who is responsible for the violence that may happen if we do not obey and they will be “forced” to board our little boat. I cynically tried to show them how ridiculous it seems to have so many armed, strong and trained soldiers boarding a boat with 9 un-armed people, most of whom remember the second world war and civil right movement in the 60’s, who declare non-violence. How can they portray the violence as our responsibility. I reminded them of the holocaust survivor and bereaved parent on board and that we do not want any confrontation with them. I think it made them angry but reduced their possible violence to most passengers apart from Yonatan and I. It is very important to remember that the Israeli army had killed two Gazan fishermen in the passing week with minimum media attention for getting “too close” to what the IDF has decided the blockade border is. Therefore their violence toward us must be put in proportion to this.

During all the military action I was talking to Al Jazeera but I’m not sure what they have of it or what was broadcast as he was about to go on air when the phone was grabbed.

They attacked Itamar and took him to their boat. The other soldiers viciously pushed Glynn from the helm. The rest were holding hands singing “We Shall Overcome.” I think Reuven may have been playing his harmonica!

ITAMAR: At least 2 soldiers, to what i understood, were assigned to getting all recording devices. The Israeli Ch 10 reporter stood next to me and one of the soldiers just took his camera from his hand. I took the camera back without touching the soldier and put it behind my back and refused to give it to the soldiers. The soldier called another one and together tried to make me move with twisting arms and shouting and trying to reach for the camera. when they did not succeed they asked for a permission from their commander to arrest me. 4 of them dragged me to the military boat and forced me down to the boat’s floor in order to handcuff me. i did not give up until one of them pushed his fingers deep onto the artery in my neck, and then i heard Yonatan’s dreadful scream and saw him losing control of his body because of the electric shock he got. I shouted to Rami to throw the camera into the boat’s engine-room and Yonatan was brought to the military boat that i was on and we were both handcuffed and taken to a large ship.

While we were holding hands singing the soldiers started taking over everything. At that point I was sitting on the floor of the boat hugging Glynn and Reuven, trying to decrease the risk to them, then moved to sit with Rami. On each side one of the passengers turned off the engines so as not to make it possible for the navy to steer the boat to a different place.

Soldiers on boat approached me and Rami, they seemed to want to take me to a Navy boat. Me and Rami hugged each other – the strongest hug I have ever given to anyone!

The officer came towards us, pulling out his taser ordered us to stop holding on to each other. The soldier threatened if I did not let go they would hurt me, then tasered me on my right shoulder and shot twice – it was very painful – but not as painful as the next shot where he pulled aside my life jacket, put gun on my chest and fired.My whole body lost control and I convulsed like a fit, I let out a high pitched scream. Then they took me to one of their boats.

And that was the “non-violent” take over of the Jewish boat to Gaza. Of course if we were Palestinians or Muslims they would have shot with live ammo, but because we were Jews and Israelis and had world attention they did not want to do what they did to the Mavi Marmara. Of course later they took all evidence filmed by Eli and Vish and the only evidence which now exists is with the military and the military film itself. It would be amazing if somehow there was pressure for the army to release the media materials we shot – there’s no reason for them to keep it. It’s amazing footage of all 48 hours of the voyage and the messages we wrote on the masts and flags from everyone who had sent wishes. Probably the most powerful images are of the actual seconds when the Navy boarded the ship.

All our banners and flags were pulled down by the army and the boat was pulled with the rest of passengers on-board to Ashdod.

Itamar and I went to Ashdod in the big warship which took several hours. We saw the boat being towed to the port. We saw the protesters, friends, family and supporters waiting for us on the beach since the morning, and a boat of film makers with cameras that were trying to reach us but was intercepted and forced to turn back to the port.

Each one of us had an intimate body search – they touched me quite intimately but no internal search. Eventually we were taken to a police station in Ashdod and saw more demonstrators waiting for us outside.

The police station took several hours, they interrogated Rami, Itamar, Reuven, Eli and I and we were all accused of trying to enter an illegal closed zone, while Rami, Itamal and I were also accused of threatening, insulting and attacking the soldiers. We were all released around eight in the evening. It was shocking to be attacked so brutally whilst hugging and singing – the soldiers shouted at us, shook and pushed us. We were shocked to hear the army say the takeover was peaceful.

There was a big group of Israeli media and also people from Reuters and a few others waiting for us outside station. We answered their questions, then Reuven took out his harmonica and played a beautiful Jewish songs about people who pursued peace. Everyone joined in around us, as we sang together some people who were passing by shouted things like “death to the Arabs”.

If we weren’t Jews and Israelis we would have much less chance to make it out alive. I send my love and thanks to everyone for all of their support, love and efforts to help us.”

NOTE:

Yonatan was not given or offered any medical attention at any point after he was shot with the taser.

They were released on 5000 N.I.S bail to return for additional interrogation or court discussion.

It is unclear as to whether they will be charged.


Glyn Secker’s Testimony

Getting to Farmagusta was a long long trip, the longest passage we’d made – two nights and three days, and having to manually helm every minute of the way as we never managed to get the auto-pilot working. Usually after such passages there’s the expectation of being able to catch up on sleep, to relax a little and to re-charge ourselves. But we were only too aware that as the last port of call this stop was going to be be the most demanding of all: we had intentionally chosen a port which was not set up for small craft and knew that even finding a berth was going to be a challenge. Then we had an intensive schedule of press conferences, loading the boat with the aid and the banners, re-fueling and watering enough for double the length of the final passage (in case we were forced to return), getting the passengers on board, and all this under the watchful eyes of the port authorities whose attitude we were uncertain of.

We arrived as Sven-Y-Two as a tourist boat. A local fisherman allowed us to use one of his berths and then amazingly organized fuel from the town which he brought in jerry cans, and water, and helped me buy the outboard motor for the Gaza fishermen, spending most of the afternoon driving me round the town looking for a dealer open on the weekend. The port police were friendly but of course bound by their own cumbersome procedures, then surprised us by summoning other officials to come to us rather than us having to find them in town.

Meeting up with the London team and the passengers was straightforward and a mixture of hugs and kisses and anxiety and frenetic action. The press conference the next morning generated its own momentum and and it was then that I really began to feel the whole project lifting off. And it did so with a bang – the AP team were local Turkish Cypriots and as a matter of routine sought permission from the port authority to film our departure despite all the strictures to keep beneath the radar. Our hearts sank when returning to the port we were greeted by the sight of a police car. Not to arouse suspicion we had invented a story that we had just met up with a group of friends on a separate holiday and that we wished to take them for a spin around the bay. But we then discovered that the regulations required the port police to hold the passports until people return. At this point we realised the story may not hold, and we were at a loss as to what to do. After more discussion between the authorities it became clear that they had probably cottoned on to whom we really were and simply stated ‘Look, if you all just want to get on the boat and go and not return, that’s fine with us.’ ! So we were then into a frantic scramble to get away before there were any calls to higher authorities or they changed their minds. Hurriedly we laid out all the aid to be photographed, got all the banners out, got all passengers on board and within half an hour had cast off. The friendly fisherman had invited the AP media on board and as we left the port holding aloft the banners he cast off and circled us giving them the shots which went around the world and which alerted the IDF to our imminent arrival.

The weather was still very kind to us and we made better progress than expected. Not wanting to time the encounter with the IDF in the dark we slowed down and when the morning had warmed up I suggested that a good way to de-stress would be to stop the boat and for us all take a swim in the sparkling deep blue water. We put out a long line with a fender on the end and in we all plunged – a swim to remember. Reuvan was amazing, confidently swimming away from the boat and me trying to keep him within reach of the safety line! I think I was the only one who had any breakfast – home made muesli (wonderful almond nuts).

And then finally after all these days and weeks of anticipation we identified a frigate on the horizon. It shadowed us for some considerable time, keeping on our port side about five miles off. Then we saw a number of smaller craft lined up and realized that the encounter was approaching. We rehearsed our strategies and waited, with adrenalin levels slowly rising. Shortly there came a call on Ch 16 over the VHF from the frigate asking us our intentions and the flag of the boat. I informed them that we were heading for Gaza port, that we were in international waters and had no intention of entering Israeli waters. They replied that Gaza was within a prohibited area and that we should change our course. I responded by stating that that did not accord with international law, that we were unarmed, had no materials which could be put to military use, that we carried a consignment of aid for Gaza and that we expected safe passage. They then warned us that they would intercept us, that this could be dangerous for the crew and damaging for the boat. I reiterated that as a British flagged boat they had no legal right to intercept us and that we intended to maintain our course to Gaza. There was no reply and we continued on our passage for perhaps another twenty minutes – presumably they were waiting for us to cross the boundary of their unilaterally declared prohibited zone.

There then developed a sight which will remain with me for the rest of my life – with the frigate in the background, two gunboats, two landing craft and four high powered ribs spread out in a semi-circle speeding towards us at perhaps 35 knots, with their bow waves and wakes flashing in the sunshine. It was surreal, it was like an action movie, and entranced by the sight I had to remind myself this was actually happening – this overwhelming force for a 9.7 metre 40 yr. old boat, the majority of its Jewish occupants over 60 years old, with no weapons and a publicized policy of passive resistance.

The next we knew there were two ribs very close alongside with the commander on a megaphone again warning us of the dangers if they boarded us. I reiterated our legal rights, and for what it was worth I accelerated, just to make a point that outpacing them was fantasy. Then as planned Itamar addressed the commandos in Hebrew and English, calling on them not to obey the orders to take actions which are illegal under international law. The ribs closed in, and the boarding commenced.

All the crew and passengers (apart from myself as I was steering) held hands.They boarded us simultaneously from both sides. At that moment we cut the engines and sat over the access points to the cut offs to prevent them restarting the engines. The wheel is on the starboard side of the boat. I was surrounded by three commandos, I held on to the wheel as hard as I could. It reminded me of being on violent picket lines with the police trying to break through. One grabbed my left arm, another my right arm. The third stood by with a Tazer gun. After a struggle they managed to prize my hands from the wheel and threw me down on the floor. I managed to crawl behind them and remove the engine starter keys but one of them saw me and prized the keys from my hands.

On the opposite side of the cockpit Yonatan Shapira and his brother Itamar had been identified by the IDF commander in charge. He sought to separate them from the others. Yonatan clasped Rami in a hug to prevent himself being removed. The senior officer then moved one sideYonatan’s lifejacket covering his left breast, placed a Tazer gun in contact with his clothing and fired it directly into his heart. Yonatan let out a dreadful scream and the force of the Tazer caused him to lose control of his muscles. He was pulled off Rami and across the cockpit to the middle. He was then hit twice more by the Tazer gun, screaming out again. Both he and Itamar were forcefully pulled off our boat onto the IDF rib on port side.They were driven at very high speed over the waters, which had now become moderately rough (the wind had increased to a F4) and it would have been very uncomfortable especially for Yonatan still recovering from the Tazer shocks. They were taken to the frigate where they were treated normally, then to shore and released on bail without charges.

Meanwhile I had turned off the fuel supply to the engines. After some time (the engines only burn 1 1/2 litres per hour) when the fuel in the pipes had been used up the port engine started to fail. (The starboard fuel shut-off failed to work). After many attempts to restart the engine the IDF took the boat in tow. The boat is designed to go through the water at a maximum speed of about 8 knots. They towed us through the rough waters at 12 – 14 knots. The boat was bouncing about violently, it was dangerous for the remaining passengers and crew, including Reuvan, our 82 year old holocaust survivor. We all sustained bruises and the passage to Ashdod was exhausting. There was something like eight commandos on the boat in addition to ourselves so it was grossly overloaded. It was surprising that the boat did not begin to break up, the whole structure was groaning and making cracking sounds. It was clear that they intended to seriously mistreat the boat. During the passage they tore down all the banners and flags – including the red ensign (the UK flag) which legally has to be displayed in all foreign waters.

As a gesture of defiance I decided to cook lunch! Not easy in the circumstance but I managed to produce omlett (with garlic) sandwiches which Reuvan, Lillian and I think Eli and I shared. Whilst in the galley I took the opportunity of chucking out of the window the carving knife, the bread knife, a chisel and two hammers from the tool box, remembering that similar items had been photographed as evidence of weapons on previous boats.

I’d like to point out that in the USA it is illegal for the police or the army to fire Tazers directly into the heart as there have been a number of cases of heart failure and death as a result of such targeting.

The fact that Yonatan was released without charge makes it very clear that the use of the Tazer on him was purely malicious.

Contrary to IDF reports, there was therefore, considerable resistance, be it non-violent, to the IDF’s illegal hijacking of our boat, and there was considerable, unprovoked and very dangerous violence perpetrated by the IDF.

On arriving at Ashdod we were greeted by perhaps 100 people in uniforms of one sort or another within an a secure area created by ships containers. We were obliged to pass through a tent where we were subjected to detailed body searches and luggage searches. I was the last out as I insisted on making an inventory of the boat valuables, though I was unable to get any officer to countersign it it, it was taken by a female officer from I believe their foreign office, but this was not clear. Before I was allowed back on the boat to do the inventory it was searched, including the use of a dog. None of us of course had any illegal drugs, but I have to admit of a nervous moment when someone asked me if any previous owner might have stashed anything away – this hadn’t occurred to me. Whilst waiting I was approached by a Major who stated that he was in charge of Gaza boarder security and he offered to transport our aid to Gaza. He arranged for us to go onto the boat, I extracted the aid from the lockers and he placed it where he could find it later. The boat was in a state of chaos, having been ransacked by those searching it. I don’t suppose they intend clearing out the fridge and other food, so god knows what it will be like after a few weeks in what is still a hot time of year. Combined with the split bellows on the loo pump whoever goes on the boat next will need a good face mask and a strong stomach.

I was taken to the Immigration and Boarder Authority where I experienced a truly Kafkaesque moment. We were presented with a form to sign which stated that I was due to be deported being suspected of residing in Israel illegally. When I pointed out that the only reason I was in Israel at all was that the IDF had kidnapped me and forcefully brought me into Israel on the orders of the government, the reply was that it did not matter who had brought me in, but that now I was there I was there without permission and so due for deportation. They were not amused by my laughter.

The regulations allowed for a rapid departure at their expense if I signed the form, but I was anxious not to be seen to recognize the Israeli law creating the blockade and therefore the basis for deportation.Then equally bizarrely, they stated that I could add whatever statement I wished to the form and could have a photocopy, so I added a clause stating that I did not recognize the legal basis for the deportation as it had no basis in international law, and duly signed.

Eventually the lawyers then arrived – really great people. I checked that my understanding of the law was correct and that if I had opted to go to court to appeal the deportation the result would have been the same and they confirmed I had it right. The IDF had smashed up the sat phone I had hired in front of me. I hope they will explain to the insurance company why they had not just taken it so that it could be returned later.

I was then taken to the detention centre at Ben Gurion airport. Again we and our luggage were all subject to yet more detailed searches. The smallness of the minds of those whose job it is day in and day out to carry out these numbing tasks can only be guessed at. Then, I was alone with Vash, banged up for the night – banged being a very appropriate word describing the door slam behind you. Having many times visited clients in detention or prison as a social worker it was odd indeed being on the other end but my complete self confidence in the absolute correctness of our principles and our understanding of international law never deserted me.

Despite asking for water I was left without a drink for 12 hours. When I asked again in the morning I was told to drink the tap water – which was warm. Later they provided a cup of tea and a roll and a towel, so I was able to shower. The officers who were to take me to the airport were Ethiopian Jews and were required to put me in ankle cuffs for the journey. I told them it was not at all necessary – they were rather embarrassed and apologized but said they were obliged to use them. At least they carried my bag to the minibus. I was taken directly to the plane on the tarmac and had to climb a metal staircase up to the access, the cuff chain clanking on the steps – reminded me of Winton Marsarlis’s song about the chain gangs.

They removed the cuffs out of sight of the other passengers and then another Kafqeresque moment when I am welcomed aboard by the chief steward as any other passenger, informed that there will be a meal and drinks provided and wished me a comfortable journey! There was sophisticated inflight entertainment – it was a Boeing 777 – but there was no news service at all, very odd, I was in an El Al bubble.

I didn’t think anyone at home knew of my flight arrival time as I didn’t know it until I was on the plane, but the lawyers must have told Miri and it was absolutely great, in fact overwhelming, to be greeted by Vanessa and a welcome party of close friends – amazing, what a two days, never to be forgotten.

Its fantastic coming back to amazing support that’s buzzing. I’m overwhelmed with the results I think it was really successful. We made our point to the world very powerfully that there are probably hundreds of thousands of Jews around the world who are appalled at the Israeli policies to the Palestinians; the violations of their humanity and their human rights.

Glyn Secker, Captain of the Jewish Boat to Gaza

The BBC’s Biased & Shameful Coverage of the Attack on the Gaza Freedom Flotilla is a Betrayal of its Charter

In the New Statesman yesterday and in the Morning Star, Tribune and Weekly Worker tomorrow/this weekend, an advert signed by over 200 people will appear. It criticises the disgraceful and shameful coverage by the BBC of the murders on the Gaza Freedom Flotilla on May 31st this year. The advert has been signed a wide variety of activists, Britain’s first Green MP Caroline Lucas, Tony Benn, Michael Mansfield QC, Leon Rosselsson and a host of academics such as Avi Shlaim and Moshe Machover.

We originally submitted it, after having raised the necessary cash to
The Independent. They refused to carry it and I copy below the correspondence with their Managing Editor, Imogen Haddon. The Independent, which seems to be anything but, said its excuses were ‘legal’. But the lawyer who objected, one Janet Youngson, admitted to me that she had previously worked at the BBC! She dressed up her own political objections to the advert in legal obfuscations. We made it clear that we were happy to make it explicit that the opinions were our own but her favourite saying was that ‘it makes no difference if you say ‘in our opinion’ they murdered x).' Which of course is true, saying 'in my opinion' doesn't change a libel to a non-libel, but the point was that an expression of opinion such as this was not libellous in any case, but fair comment.

The whole point of course is that the Israeli military did murder those on board the Mavi Marmara. This has now been confirmed by the
Report of the United Nations Human Rights Commission. The Guardian’s legal objections were minor and it was lack of funding that prevented us running it there. The Independent’s objections were wholly political. I wrote to Ms Haddon on 27th September, after the New Statesman, Morning Star and Tribune had agreed to run it, saying we’d run out of cash but that she had a moral duty to print it for nothing. Surprisingly Ms Haddon doesn’t believe in such
things and has not replied!

I have a feeling that none of the above papers, plus the
Weekly Worker, will be sued. Strange thing that - murderers tend not to sue their critics.

Tony Greenstein

The BBC - The Voice of Israel

On 16th August BBC Panorama’s ‘Death on the Med’ was, in its own words, ‘given unique access’ to the Israeli Naval Commando which attacked the Gaza Freedom Flotilla, killing nine activists on the Mavi Marmara.

In return, the BBC broadcast what amounted to a half hour justification of the murder of 9 aid workers and the wounding of 50 more aboard the Flotilla. The BBC’s Orwellian production portrayed the victims of Israel’s premeditated attack on the ships as the ones guilty of violence. The BBC even broadcast a clearly faked clip, purporting to come from the Flotilla saying ‘go back to Auschwitz’. Even the IDF admitted on June 5th that this had been ‘edited’ and was not from the MM.

Whilst the rest of the world expressed incredulity at Israel’s claim that its commandos had acted in self defence, BBC’s radio and TV news broadcast, without comment, Benjamin Netanyahu’s absurd claim that “Israel did all it could to avoid violence”. Likewise Mark Regev, Israeli government PR chief, went unchallenged as he justified the murders and vilified the victims.

Throughout its coverage BBC News 24 broadcast uncritically Israel’s own film “evidence” of their commandos being attacked, when it was fully aware that this had edited out the initial lethal attack. This was both unethical and immoral. Israel’s military had also stolen all photographic evidence to the contrary, as well as the recording equipment and personal possessions of the witnesses to Israel’s attack. The BBC’s behaviour is an incentive to other states to behave similarly. By the time the Flotilla survivors were free to tell their side of the story, the BBC news agenda had conveniently moved on.

Anyone relying on BBC news would not have heard world famous Swedish novelist Henning Mankell, recount the beatings inflicted on activists after they were detained. They were also not shown the photographs smuggled past Israel’s pirates, showing activists giving medical treatment to Israeli commandos disarmed aboard the Mavi Marmara.

Nor did the BBC’s viewers hear about the American Jewish student, Emily Henochowicz, who lost an eye on May 31 during a protest against the attack on the Flotilla, when Israeli soldiers fired a teargas canister directly at her.

Knowledge of Israel’s routinely violent attacks on Palestinians and peaceful international protestors would have provided meaningful context to the attack on the Flotilla. Instead a BBC correspondent stated on May 31st: ‘Of course the Israeli military is very well experienced at dealing with crowd control.”

If the Iranian or North Korean states had carried out a lethal attack, in international waters, on a ship flying another country’s flag, can one imagine BBC broadcasting uncritical interviews with apologists for any resulting deaths?

The BBC’s decision to broadcast uncritically Israeli film of the attack reflects a consistently pro-Israeli bias in its coverage of the Israel-Palestinian conflict, something highlighted in a report presented to the corporation’s Governors in April 2006. The report stated that “BBC coverage does not consistently constitute a full and fair account of the conflict but rather, in important respects, presents an incomplete and in that sense misleading picture.”

The Report noted that historical and other context was frequently absent and coverage failed to reflect “the fact that one side is in control and the other lives under occupation.” It also found that “the death of an Israeli killed by the Palestinian side was more likely to be reported by the BBC than the death of a Palestinian killed by the Israeli side.” These failings have been highlighted by the BBC’s coverage of the siege of Gaza

There needs to be a fundamental change in the BBC’s news coverage in order that the context of events is always present in its coverage and that it doesn’t use Israeli film unquestioningly. Why did Panorama not investigate the attack from the standpoint of those who were killed and injured instead of allowing itself to be bought off with ‘unique access’ to the killers?

And how was Panorama's 'Death on the Med' able to gain exclusive interviews with Israel’s naval commandos when the Israeli government has told the UN inquiry and its own Turkel Commission that they will not allow them to testify?

We wish to see the BBC stand up to threats from Israel instead of caving in, as occurred when the government of Ariel Sharon targeted correspondents Orla Guerin and Jeremy Bowen. (BBC Says Sorry to Israel, 12.3.05. The Guardian, BBC appoints Middle East tsar, 11.11.03.)

Let us see no more of the blatant bias exhibited by the BBC’s refusal, in January 2009, to broadcast the Disasters Emergency Committee appeal for Gaza.

1. Dr. Vahitha Abdul-Salam
2. George Abendstern
3. Dr Emile Aboud
4. Dr Shadi Abu-Hayyeh
5. Jackie Alsaid
6. Beatrice Andrieu,
7. Mike Arnott,
8. Malcolm Bailey
9. Dr David Baker
10. Professor Mona Baker
11. Fiona Balaban
12. David Bangs
13. Frank Barat
14. Geoff Barr
15. Jinan Bastaki
16. Dr. A.F. J. Bell
17. Paul Bemrose
18. Tony Benn
19. Richard Berks
20. Greta Berlin
21. Jo Bird
22. Rica Bird
23. Jim Black
24. Patrick Black
25. Dr. Susan Blackwell
26. Prof. Haim Bresheeth
27. Andy Brown
28. Dr. Judith Brown
29. Dr.Chris Burns-Cox
30. Dr Timothy Bushell
31. Dave Campbell
32. Val Cane
33. Jean Calder
34. Patricia Chaffee
35. Linda Clair
36. Nigel Clark
37. Ruth Clark
38. Eve Clement
39. Jerrold Cohen
40. Sheila Colman
41. Sheila Coombes,
42. Prof Andrea Cornwall
43. Mike Cushman
44. Martin Cutler
45. Dr Adam Darwish
46. Teresa Delaney
47. Lilian Joan Dell
48. Barbara Denuelle
49. Dr Merav Devere
50. Professor James Dickins
51. William Dienst
52. Carol Diggle
53. Greg Dropkin
54. Dr John Drury
55. Professor Mick Dunford
56. Professor Mohamed El-Gomati
57. Mark Elf
58. Tom Eisner
59. Andrew Elliott
60. Susan Elliott
61. Dr Catherine Farnworth
62. Dr Abdul Ashraf Fattah
63. Mrs Jackie Fearnley
64. Jonny Feldman
65. Alf Filer
66. Mark Findlay
67. Deborah Fink
68. Mr RC Finney
69. Sylvia Finzi
70. Pete Firmin
71. Gerry Flintoft
72. Jenny Flintoft
73. Naomi Foyle
74. Linda Frank
75. Garth Frankland
76. Kenneth Fryde
77. Terry Gallogly
78. Jasmine Gani
79. Charles Gate
80. Dr Ramez Ghazoul
81. Dr Sarah Glynn
82. Olga Gora
83. Nina Gora
84. Tony Greenstein
85. Dr Anne Gray
86. Mick Hall
87. Ann Hallam
88. Peter Hallward
89. David Halpin
90. Mira Hammad
91. Keith Hammond
92. Mr C G Hanley
93. Fajr Harb
94. Mr RG Hart
95. Peter Harvey
96. Dr Rumy Hasan
97. Abe Hayeem
98. Martin Hemingway
99. Mr Henning
100. Mrs Henning
101. Andy Hewett
102. David Hillman
103. Mr D Hoadley
104. Prof Richard Hudson
105. Gaynor Hudson
106. Mary Hughes-Thompson
107. Fazia Hussain
108. Bob Jarrett
109. Marilyn Jarrett
110. Monica Jones
111. Michael Kalmanovitch
112. Samira Kawar
113. Judith Kazantzis
114. Reem Kelani
115. Dr. Paul Kelemen
116. Hudda Khaireh
117. Sadia Kidawi
118. Bernard Kilroy
119. David Landau
120. Dr Stephen Leah
121. Joe Lee
122. Leah Levane
123. Dr Les Levidow
124. Bruce Levy
125. Ros Levy
126. Professor Abby Lippman
127. Caroline Lucas MP
128. Ziyaad Lunat
129. Jenny Lynn
130. Phelim MacCafferty
131. Bill MacKeith
132. Professor Moshé Machover
133. Ms. Iman Mahmoud
134. Beryl Maizels
135. Naeem Malik
136. Saleh Mamon
137. Michael Mansfield QC
138. Mike Marqusee
139. Zoe Mars
140. Professor Nur Masalha
141. Dr Ian Mason
142. Dr. Willem Meijs
143. John Metson
144. Martine Miel
145. Muna Mohamed
146. Keith Mollison
147. Dr Margaret Monica Jones
148. Patrick Montague
149. Siobhan Mooney
150. Kevin Moore
151. Shena Moore
152. Ms JJ Moore-Blunt
153. Patricia Morrison
154. Dr Dalia Mostafa
155. Mohamed Ibrahim Mostafa
156. Bahadur Najak
157. Simon Natas
158. Diana Neslen
159. Kathleen O’Connor Wang
160. Safiya O'Donnell,
161. Annie O'Gara
162. Ken O’Keefe
163. Dennis O’Malley
164. Nicola Oestreicher
165. Ernesto Paramo
166. Felicia Parazaider
167. Dr Susan Pashkoff
168. Mrs G Patton
169. Mr T Patton
170. Janet Pavone
171. Professor David Pegg
172. Romayne Phoenix
173. Susan Pike
174. Veronica Planton
175. Shae Popovich
176. Caroline Poland
177. James Porter
178. Penny Porter
179. Dr Natasha Posner
180. Jawad Qasrawi
181. Mr M A Qavi
182. Dinah Raman
183. Roland Rance
184. Andrew Read
185. Roger Reeve
186. Professor Dee Reynolds
187. Dr John Richardson
188. Dr Chris Roberts, Reader
189. Professor Hilary Rose
190. Professor Jonathan Rosenhead
191. Leon Rosselson
192. Sandra Ruch
193. Daniel Russell
194. Liz Russell
195. Michael Sackin
196. Professor Myriam Salama-Carr
197. Dr Gabriela Saldanha
198. Ariel Salzmann
199. Professor Donald Sassoon
200. Dominic Saunders
201. David K. Schermerhorn
202. Alice Severs
203. John Severs
204. Michael Shanahan
205. Sue Shaw
206. Professor Avi Shlaim
207. John Siddique
208. Andrew Silver
209. Peter Smith
210. Chris Soames-Charlton
211. Mary Starkey
212. Heather Stroud,
213. Steve Stroud,
214. John Strover
215. Dr Derek Summerfield
216. Simon Tate
217. Ruth Tenne
218. Baroness Dr Jenny Tonge
219. Dr Norman Traub
220. Patricia Tricker
221. Pip Tindall
222. John Tymon
223. Yvette Vanson
224. Stanley Walinets,
225. Pam Walton
226. Dr Peter Watt
227. Irving Weinman
228. Lee Whitaker
229. Naomi Wimborne-Idrissi
230. Devra Wiseman
231. Pam Wortley
232. Dr Monica Wusteman

Please Contribute
This advert has been paid for by subscribers to this advert. We wish to place more adverts in the press and we would ask you to help us to redress the bias against the Palestinians in the BBC’s coverage. Coverage paid for by all licence payers. Please make cheques out to J-Big and send to:

The Campaign to End BBC bias against the Palestinians, PO Box 164, Brighton BN1 7WB
campaign_against_bbc_me_bias@yahoo.co.uk

E-mail Correspondence with The Independent


Monday, 27 September 2010

Imogen Haddon
Managing Editor
The Independent and The Independent on Sunday
2 Derry Street
London W8 5HF

Dear Ms Haddon,

In your e-mail of 14.9.10. you stated that there was nothing more that could be constructively done regarding the advert we tried to place with you concerning the attack on the Gaza Freedom Flotilla. The reasons you gave were the fear of defamation and the ASA.

Last week the Fact Finding Mission, set up by the UN's Human Rights Committee, issued a Report. I attach it for your convenience. It is clear that there is now a lot that you can constructively do.

In their Report, the UN Mission [Para 20] confirmed our view of the video and other footage released by the Israeli state:
In light of seizure of cameras, CCTV footage and digital media storage devices and of the suppression of that material with the disclosure only of a selected and minute quantity of it, the Mission was obliged to treat with extreme caution the versions released by the Israeli authorities where those versions did not coincide with the evidence of eyewitnesses who appeared before us.’
This entirely backs up what we said about the immoral behaviour of the BBC in using, without comment, Israeli military video footage when that same military had confiscated all evidence to the contrary.

You also objected to our comments regarding the fake 'Auschwitz' tape that the Israeli Military broadcast. Here too the UN Report [Para. 110] confirms what we said:
However, the Mission is not satisfied that these recordings are authentic, nor has the Israeli government made this material available to the Mission for appropriate examination. The Mission was given positive evidence that no such statements were made by anyone involved in communications on the flotilla.
I have produced a detailed analysis of the UN Report for your perusal.

The rejection of a paid advertisement on 'legal grounds', when it is now clear that such objections were politically and factually mistaken, should be a matter of some concern to you. If the Independent stands for anything it is, or should be, freedom of speech. If the Independent is indeed independent and if this is not just sales patter, then you should be big enough to admit that you were wrong and to rectify what happened. It is bad enough that the libel laws stifle open discussion and debate about matters of public concern in this country. It is even worse when newspapers engage in self-censorship using these laws as a pretext.

Everything that we alleged has been confirmed in the UN Report which was meticulous, although of course immediately dismissed by Israel as 'one-sided' 'biased' 'anti-Semitic' etc.

The advert will be appearing in the New Statesman, Morning Star and Tribune, small publications without your resources. I believe that you owe it, not just to us but to the wider interests of a free press, to now publish this advertisement free of charge. This would demonstrate your commitment to oppose the chilling effects of the libel laws, including their encouragement to publications such as yourself to self-censorship. The money we would have paid you has gone to other publications so it would be a matter of you paying to rectify your own mistake.

I realise that it is not easy for you to admit that you got it wrong over this but I hope that you will be able to admit that, in hindsight, since the UN Report was not available at the time of our exchanges, we were right in what we said and that the Independent has a wider duty not to engage in censorship dressed up in legal mystification.

Yours sincerely,

Tony Greenstein

From: "I.Haddon@independent.co.uk"
To: tony greenstein
Sent: Tue, 14 September, 2010 12:48:49
Subject: Re: Censorship of Advert

Dear Mr. Greenstein,

Thank you for your e-mail below.

I am aware that our lawyer spoke to you about the advertisement. I am sorry that it has not helped you, but I consider that we have done as much as we can to assist you and explain the position. I realise that you do not agree, but my view is that there is nothing further that can be done constructively, so I will regard our correspondence on this as at an end now.

Yours sincerely,

Imogen Haddon
Managing Editor
The Independent and The Independent on Sunday

From: tony greenstein
To: I.Haddon@independent.co.uk
Date: 11/09/2010 22:52
Subject: Re: Censorship of Advert

Saturday, 11 September 2010
Imogen Haddon
Managing Editor
The Independent and The Independent on Sunday

Dear Ms Haddon,

I was rung up by your libel lawyer, Janet Youngson I believe her name is, yesterday regarding the advert we tried placing with the Independent on 19th August concerning the BBC’s coverage of the attack on the Gaza Freedom Flotilla. I assumed, after our recent correspondence, that she would be able to give me a list of specific points which you had problems with, in order that we could hopefully agree to any amendments or alterations deemed necessary to enable you to run the ad.

Ms Youngson immediately made it clear that she was unable to provide a list of objections because, in her own words, she had marked nearly every paragraph as requiring changes. I told her that I was happy, for example, to make it clear that it wasin our opinion that the Israeli Military’s ‘
Go Back to Auschwitz’ clip, that was uncritically broadcast by the BBC, was a fake rather than simply stating it as such. Ms Youngson’s response was that that changed nothing. It was equally defamatory, she said, to say that ‘in our opinion you are a murderer’.

There is however a difference, as there usually is, with such broad brush analogies. The Israeli navy commandos did murder 9 unarmed peace activists in international waters, most shot at close quarters to the head. Likewise the ‘Auschwitz’ clip contained no background sounds or noise, like the other clips the IOF broadcast, so it could have been recorded by anyone, anywhere and at any time. This was, of course, after the Israeli military had withdrawn their claim that it came from the Mavi Marmara. Ms Youngson’s response was that in a libel case the defendant has to prove their assertion, which is true, but this is on the balance of probability. Questions such as Israel’s confiscation of film and recording equipment would, in itself, have enabled powerful inferences to be drawn. I would have been prepared to make it clear that the BBC did not knowingly broadcast a faked tape, though it use of such was clearly grossly negligent, but this too wasn’t acceptable.

Ms Youngson also had problems with the statement that ‘Throughout its coverage the BBC broadcast uncritically Israel’s own film “evidence” of their commandos being attacked, when it was fully aware that this had edited out the initial lethal attack.’‘ Yet this is an established fact. Ms Youngson’s response was that the BBC often show people’s home video clips! Well yes, but this wasn’t a home or mobile movie but a carefully edited IDF clip which excluded the original attack on the ships.

Her next objection was that I couldn’t prove that the BBC had done this everywhere, including on its Arabic World Service broadcasts. This is true. I don’t have the resources monitor the BBC world-wide. Nor is it necessary since the advert is being placed in a British newspaper. However I offered to change this to BBC News 24, but this was also unacceptable.

What Ms Youngson was really seeking was nothing less than a wholesale rewriting of the advert, the effect of which would have been to make it so innocuous that it would no longer have been our views that were expressed. It also transpired that Ms Youngson had worked at the BBC as a lawyer, because she kept referring to how the BBC worked internally.

We also approached the Guardian to run the advert, but decided for other reasons against this. Their legal department also had objections and, as the e-mail below demonstrates, they had no difficulty outlining what they were. Their objections related solely to a minor rewording of the allegation that the tape which was broadcast was faked and that the IDF had admitted it was not from the MM.

What made the conversation with Ms Youngson even more surreal was that she admitted the BBC would not sue for libel. The idea that the Israeli military would sue, when they are keen to avoid subjecting any of their claims to an independent inquiry, is absurd. Ms Youngson also stated that if another newspaper printed the advert then she’d have no or fewer problems about running it, even though the fact that another publication prints something libellous is no defence to a libel action.

It became clear to me that despite her claims to be speaking as a libel lawyer, Ms Youngson’s and therefore the Independent’s objections to the advert, were political not legal. We could not criticise the BBC’s coverage unless we could prove everything according to the ‘beyond reasonable doubt’ test and in any event we were ascribing a motive to their slanted coverage, namely that it was deliberate, whereas I was quite happy to accept that they have been biased for so long, on the Palestinian and other questions, that it is almost subconscious.

The reason that Ms Youngson and the Independent could not supply a list of specific objections was that it objected to the advert in toto but did not feel able to say this. It is clear that any legal concerns were a smokescreen for political objections. I pointed out repeatedly that what we were saying was covered by provisions relating to ‘fair comment’ in libel law, which she did not seem able to take on board. I then decided that there was no point in continuing the conversation and terminated the call.

The advert which we have unsuccessfully tried to place with you was no more than a paid for Op-Ed. There was nothing defamatory about it at all. The objections to it were political not legal. I would have expected the Independent of all papers to have resisted the temptation to engage in such absurd self-censorship. Clearly I was wrong.

Yours sincerely,

Tony Greenstein

From: Jennifer Melmore

To: tony greenstein
Sent: Thu, 9 September, 2010 12:33:27
Subject: Re: Proposed advert

Hi Tony

Legal have just got back to me and said that we'll only be able to run your ad if you can make a few changes to the copy, as detailed below:

'In the 2nd paragraph ("In return, the BBC broadcast what amounted...") the advertiser would need to change the sentance "The BBC even broadcast a clearly faked clip, purporting to come from the Flotilla" to something that doesn't go as far as saying it was faked. Also the sentance " Even the IDF admitted on June 5th that this had been ‘edited’ and was not from the MM. http://tinyurl.com/2dvq6ph " would have to be changed as the IDF has apprently not said that the broadcast in question didn't come from the MM, just that it wasn't possible to tell which ship in particular it had come from.'

Please let me know what you think,

All the best,

Jennifer
Jennifer Melmore
Client Account Manager

From: "I.Haddon@independent.co.uk"

To: tony greenstein
Sent: Thu, 9 September, 2010 17:19:40
Subject: Re: Letter of 6th September and Advert

Dear Mr Greenstein,

Thank you for your e-mail of yesterday.

I understand that both Richard Morshead and Pippa Watkins spoke to you in some detail about the difficulties we had with the advertisement. You were due to go on holiday on the following day, the Friday. I understand that you said that you were not, therefore, going to have time to make any changes or to be available to check the copy for the advertisement in whatever form it finally reached. It would not have been possible to run it because of this, in any event.

I have, however, asked Richard Morshead to contact you again to discuss the content of your proposed advertisement with a view to trying to agree a form which is mutually acceptable.

Yours sincerely,

Imogen Haddon
Managing Editor
The Independent and The Independent on Sunday

From: tony greenstein
To: i.haddon@independent.co.uk
Date: 08/09/2010 18:16
Subject: Re: Letter of 6th September and Advert

Ms Haddon,

further to your letter and my faxed reply, I have consulted by e-mail the signatories and whilst sceptical they do want to give the placing of the advert in the Indie a chance before moving on.

I seriously do not know, and have not been sent or given, any specifics of what the problems were and the particular phrases that were objected to. But if it is a question of putting 'in our opinion' etc. before things which are stated as a fact, though I do believe this is obvious, then there is no principled objection but for us time is of the essence.

So I would be grateful if you could get whoever did have these objections to e-mail me the specifics and I attach for your convenience the ad as updated.

regards

Tony Greenstein

30 September 2010

How the Arabs Were Made to Bear the Guilt of the Holocaust

Arabs and the Holocaust: The Arab-Israeli War of Narratives
Gilbert Achcar

One of the most hotly talked about books issued this year has been Gilbert Achcar’s ‘Arabs and the Holocaust: The Arab-Israeli War of Narratives.' Achcar is a Professor at the School of Oriental & African Studies. He is also a member of the Fourth International and sees himself, I assume, as a revolutionary socialist.

This is an important book, but it is limited to the Arab East and not the Maghreb, the countries of Arabic North Africa which the Nazis actually invaded and occupied. The book therefore only partially covers its chosen topic. Its other major weakness is that despite the author's pretensions to a Marxist analysis this is very much a descriptive book. It deals with various phenomenon but doesn't for the most part locate them in a historically materialist dimension. It is in short a good example of bourgeois history at its best!

The book has, however been warmly received by what I call the literary chatting classes. So it was no surprise to me that Brian Klug, founder of Independent Jewish Voices introduced the book in glowing terms at its book launch, though to be fair Brian does have criticisms (at least he assures me he does!). Brian is a good example of how the liberal and more thoughtful wing of the Jewish establishment, as opposed to the Melanie Philips and Geoffrey Aldermans of the Jewish Chronicle/Daily Mail axis, have become disenchanted with the mind numbing nationalist hysteria that defends Israel right or wrong,

The book covers a topic that has lacked any thorough or detailed research. Zionism has, through its scribes like Bernard Lewis, already decided that anti-semitism was endemic in the Arab countries. The emigration of the Jews of the Arab countries from 1948 onwards is seen by them as proof positive of this fact. In fact this form of bastardised empiricism, taking facts at their face value and building subjective interpretations upon them, is the hallmark of what passes for Zionist historiography.

The obvious connection, between the Palestinian Nakba and the subsequent emigration of Arab & Oriental Jews is conveniently passed over. Also passed over is the historic role of the Arab countries as a refuge for Jews from European anti-semitism such as the Inquisition. No less than Judaism’s foremost medieval philosopher, Moses Maimonedes, whose Guide to the Perplexed, is acknowledged as a foremost contribution to the Jewish philosophic tradition, had to escape for his life to Morocco and Egypt. Likewise the Jewish communities of the Arab countries, Tunisia, Morocco largely escaped the holocaust. Yet despite the opposition of the vast majority of Arabs to the Nazis death plans, not one Arab has been given ‘righteous gentile’ status by Yad Vashem, Zionism’s holocaust propaganda institute.

Some 1%, about 5,000 of the Maghreb’s Jewish population died under Nazi occupation and perhaps about 100 were deported to the death camps in Europe from Tunisia, primarily because they were ‘politicals’. Compare this with the overall average in Europe of around 70% extermination. In the Arab Righteous of the Maghreb, Robert Satloff researched into the "lost stories of the Holocaust's long reach into the Arab lands". This is the answer to those who claim that ‘anti-semitism’ is rife in Arabic countries.

Achcar’s book is particularly incisive when it comes to analysing the demonisation of the British-Zionist appointed Mufti of Jerusalem, the minor war criminal and leader of the Arab Higher Committee, the Mufti of Jerusalem, Haj Amin al-Husseini. The Mufti’s biography occupies more space in the Encyclopaedia of the Holocaust than any other Nazi leader – Himmler, Eichmann, Heydrich (the Engineer of the Holocaust – Reitlinger’s Final Solution) bar Hitler himself. So absurd is this that on Zionist sites such as the Emperor’s Clothes, in an article ‘Mufti of Jerusalem Hajj Amin's Role as an Instigator of the Shoah (Holocaust)’ we learn that ‘There is overwhelming documentation of the role of Hajj Amin al-Husseini, the Mufti of Jerusalem, as a leading instigator of Nazi mass murders.’

Over the summer I wrote a review of the book for Permanent Revolution. I am in the process of writing a much longer review article for an academic journal, although this won’t appear for some months.

The mistreatment and persecution of Jews was no secret in North Africa. The North African Jews interviewed by Satloff who lived through this time repeatedly describe the indifferent reactions of many Arab Muslims. And cases of collaboration, as informers to the authorities and German troops or as guards in the numerous camps.

Which makes the stories of other experiences all the more moving. The express refusal of the Algerian religious and political establishment to become an accomplice in the French policy of Jewish expropriation is one example.

The Imams' resistance foiled the French authorities' attempts to buy the sympathies of Algeria's Muslim population with anti-Jewish laws. And even Messali Haj, the leader of the nationalist Parti Populaire Algérien, contradicted the French: "Restricting the rights of Jews will not bring new rights for Muslims."

The story of a Jewish woman from Tunis, who was hidden along with her family by a Muslim acquaintance for several months as a child, is a moving testament. When a German officer told this acquaintance that he intended to rape the child's mother, the family was spirited away by night to hide in a house in the country.

Tony Greenstein

Review of Gilbert Achcar’s ‘Arabs and the Holocaust: The Arab-Israeli War of Narratives’

28 September 2010

Jewish Boat to Gaza boarded by Israeli Pirates

News has just come in of the boarding of the Jewish boat, the Irene (named after Irene Bruegel one of the founders of Jews for Justice for Palestinians). Not content with a UN Human Rights Committee Report that branded the attack on the Gaza Freedom Flotilla as illegal, having used brutality, torture as well as deliberately executing 6 passengers, Israel has now compounded this with the boarding of the latest ship.

We hope that there are no casualties and that none of the passengers were subject to the normal ritual violence from the thugs that wear Israeli military uniforms.

All those who took part, including Captain Glyn Secker of JfJP, should feel proud of themselves for standing up as Jews to defy this cruel and immoral blockade of Gaza whose only effect is to hurt the very people they say are terrorised by Hamas. This is the answer to those who oppose sanctions against Israel because of ‘anti-semitism’ and all the other reasons that their friends in Apartheid South Africa gave.

Just as Jews rightly honour what are termed ‘righteous Gentiles’ for having risked their lives to save Jews during the holocaust, so we should honour those who reject Zionism and its barbaric treatment of the Palestinians.

Well done Glyn!

Tony Greenstein


Jewish Boat to Gaza boarded by Israeli forces and taken toward Ashdod port
For immediate release
28 September, 2010

Jewish Boat to Gaza boarded by Israeli forces and taken toward Ashdod port

The Irene, a boat carrying nine passengers and aid for Gaza’s population has been taken over by the Israeli navy and denied access to Gaza.

The boat is flying a British flag and its passengers include citizens of the US, the UK, Germany and Israel. Two journalists are also on board.

Last contact with the boat’s captain, Glyn Secker, was at 0937 GMT, when their path had been cut off by a Destroyer. Recent reports from other news sources indicated that the boat has been surrounded and boarded. At this point they were less than 20 miles from Gaza’s shore. Since then all phones went dead.

The occupied Gaza Strip’s territorial waters end 12 nautical miles from shore, but the Israeli blockade is enforced at 20 miles from shore.

Israeli attorney Smadar Ben Natan who is representing the passengers has asked to see her clients immediately.

Local group Physicians for Human Rights-Israel has asked for permission to send an independent doctor to visit the passengers immediately, after hearing from organizers that at least one passenger suffers from serious chronic health problems and is in need of medical care.
Speaking from London, a member of the organizing group, Richard Kuper of Jews for Justice for Palestinians, has condemned the Israeli army’s apparent action and said that this boat and its fate are a symbol of the chances for peace in the region. The way it is being treated by Israeli authorities indicates that they have no real intentions of reaching peace, he said. He called for worldwide support for the boat and its message of protest against the siege of Gaza and the occupation.

European Jews for a Just Peace, Jews for Justice for Palestinians (UK), Juedische Stimme fuer einen gerechten Frieden in Nahost (Germany), American Jews for a Just Peace (USA), Jewish Voice for Peace (USA), Jews Against the Occupation Sydney.

Contact the Foreign & Commonwealth Office

I have just seen this urgent request to contact the FCO re the crew of the Irene:

http://jewishboattogaza.org/?p=350

There is a link to the FCO’s website, from where you can email a message. There is a letter on the website which can be cut and pasted onto the box on the website. I think it is important to stress that the interception of the boat and her crew is completely illegal and that the UK should be extremely concerned about the unlawful imprisonment of its citizens by a foreign state.

This is the text of a message from Simon Natas, a solicitor to the FCO:

Dear Sirs

I understand that the Jewish Boat to Gaza , the Irene, has been intercepted by the Israeli Navy and diverted to Ashdod . The crew of the boat, two of whom are British, have been detained by the Israeli authorities. I am extremely concerned as to the safety and well being of all the crew, some of whom are elderly.

I note the alarming evidence about mistreatment of crew and passengers of the Mavi Mamara whilst in Israeli detention as contained within the recent UN Human Rights Council report and trust that the UK authorities will do all they can to ensure the release of those detained and to ensure that their human rights are respected whilst in custody.

I should be grateful if the FCO would:

i) confirm as a matter of urgency that contact has been made with the Israeli authorities and that steps are being taken to protect the interests of those in Israeli custody.

ii) confirm that it has expressed to the Israeli authorities in the strongest terms that the interception of the Irene is unlawful and the detention of her crew contrary to Article 9, paragraph 1 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, which prevents arbitrary arrest or detention.

iii) confirm that it has conveyed to the Israeli authorities its support for the message of the boat, namely that the illegal and inhumane siege of Gaza must end as a first step towards a just solution to the conflict.

Yours faithfully,

Simon Natas

Visit www.jewishboattogaza.org and join us on Facebook and Twitter