Open Letter to Labour’s NEC – How Long will the Chakrabarti Report be Ignored?

Why, after over 19 months, has Labour’s not Implemented the Chakrabarti Report Proposals for a fair Disciplinary Procedure?

I have been expelled on the basis of charges that relate solely to allegations and material that surfaced after I was suspended on March 18th 2016.  In paragraph 102 of the Skeleton Argument of the Labour Party's barrister, Thomas Ogg, be states:

102. All of the charges relate to conduct after Mr Greenstein's suspension from theLabour Party on 18 March 2016.

In other words I was suspended first and then the Compliance Unit looked around for evidence.  If that happened in a bourgeois court the charges would be thrown out for abuse of process.  In the Guidelines to the National Constitutional Committee, Appendix 6 Clause 6D Procedural matters at NEC or CLP level states:

i. The rules under which the NCC operates make it clear that the NCC and its panels are concerned only with the charge(s). The procedures adopted on behalf of the Party or a CLP in advance of a referral to the NCC are not matters for the NCC dealing with a particular case. The NCC is entitled to (and will) act on the basis that the charges are properly brought before them and cannot become embroiled in dealing with complaints about the administration of any investigation leading to the charges. Any such complaint will therefore not be entertained by the NCC or panel thereof unless it is material or relevant to the consideration of the evidence to be used by the presenter in support of the charges.

This is what I have termed the 'Turning a blind eye' clause.  Whatever the injustices perpetrated by Sam Matthews and the Compliance Unit, the NCC is obliged to ignore it except of course that in Chapter 9, Clause IX (4) the Rule Book lays down an obligation on the Labour Party to be fair:

4. The NCC or any panel thereof in hearing and determining charges against an individual shall have regard to procedural guidelines as determined by the NCC. The NCC shall have the power to supplement such guidelines from time to time and to modify its procedures in order to meet the circumstances of any particular case to ensure fairness to both the individual and the Party.

Below is a letter from members of the Labour Party in Holborn & St Pancras and Hampstead & Kilburn asking why, 19 months later, the Chakrabarti Report’s recommendations on a fair disciplinary process have not been implemented.

The Chakrabarti Report has gathered dust for the past 19 months as the Labour Right cannot openly oppose its recommendations on natural justice and fair process

We have seen Labour Parties such as Brighton and Hove and Wallasey suspended on the basis of outright lies.  See Warren Morgan, Emma Daniels & The Spitting Incident That Never Was - The Lies that led to the Overturning of Elections & the Suspension of Brighton & Hove Labour Party [see Labour party's tensions between left and right in focus in Brighton]

Brighton and Hove were suspended solely because, having lost democratic elections to Momentum candidates, the Right invented false allegations of spitting and intimidation.  In Wallasey, after the attempted coup by 172 MPs, Angela Eagle became the challenger to Corbyn. Wallasey CLP made it clear that they were going to back Jeremy Corbyn and the Labour Party headquarters responded by suspending the party.  The pretext was false accusations of homophobia which apparently took place at an AGM.  Now, after the dust has died down, these allegations have been quietly dropped because of course they were always without substance. 

The late and unlamented Iain McNicol and his servants were happy to suspend whole parties for the benefit of Progress and the 172 PLP traitors on the basis of outright lies.  We had the spectacle of the Disputes Committee investigator in Brighton, Katherine Buckingham refusing to look at the video of the alleged spitting incident on ‘data protection’ grounds.  The real reason was, of course, that it proved that the original allegations of spitting at the front entrance were complete lies and that Councillors Warren Morgan and Emma Daniels who made the original allegations were liars.

The Letter that Anne Black, recently deposed Chair of the Disputes Committee, sent to the suspended Brighton & Hove Labour Party - from the beginning Black assumed that the allegations were true, as can be seen in her final sentence

The Chakrabarti Report on Racism and Anti-Semitism in the Labour Party has gathered dust for over 18 months.  It made a comprehensive series of recommendations, basic principles that every court of law in the country takes for granted.  However for McNicol, the Compliance Unit and Labour’s civil service, the idea of according people accused of offences under the Labour Party constitution the basic right of knowing who your accusers are, what the charges are and the evidence against you is unthinkable.  These petty bureaucrats, who would not have been out of place in Stalin's Rusia, invent allegations against those they suspend and ‘auto exclude’ for naked political reasons on the flimsiest of pretexts.  The last thing they want are any written procedures.  Fairness doesn’t come in to it.   That is why the Chakrabarti recommendations have been comprehensively ignored.

One of the demands of Labour Against the Witch-hunt is that Chakrabarti is now implemented and we expect the  now left Labour NEC to do exactly that.

Katherine Buckingham sent out the above email but her real job was to ensure that the original decision to suspend Brighton & Hove Party was vindicated

Tony Greenstein

Letter to Labour's National Executive Committee

Sisters and Brothers

We have waited for 19 months for the Chakrabarti Enquiry’s recommendations to be put into practice, and give our party the fair disciplinary procedures it needs and deserves.  We hope that the NEC will make a start today by clearing David Watson of unfounded charges and letting him return to Walthamstow where he was a valued officer.

We have seen so many good comrades across the Labour Party suspended on the basis of anonymous accusations, and still waiting to be reinstated. There have been waves of factional purges which are shameful in a democratic party. First members were accused of being Green, then trade union militants, then antisemites and then transphobic. Accusations seem to have come down most heavily on people of colour, thus further excluding them from our party which we say that we want to reflect the society we live in.

We are all members of the Labour Party in Holborn & St Pancras and Hampstead & Kilburn. Many of us have Jewish heritage.  We are concerned for Labour in future government to have a real ethical foreign policy including international co-operation and fair trade. This includes confronting the internationally condemned actions of the state of Israel and reining in its unfair trade privileges, creating equal rights for Palestinian citizens and more. We strongly deny that supporting the international nonviolent campaign of boycott, divestment and sanctions is antisemitic, or that questioning the colonising actions of Israel shows that the Labour Party harbours hatred of Jews. This is not our experience.

We are still waiting for suspended active members like David Watson to get a fair hearing and be reinstated. We need their abilities to win the next election.

23 January 2018

Signed (in alphabetical order)

Ruth Appleton, Highgate branch, GC delegate from Unite

Simon Burton, Kings Cross branch

Prof Miriam E David, Highgate branch

Daphne Davies, Kings Cross branch

Harriet Evans, Vice-Chair, Highgate branch

Pete Firmin, CWU delegate, Hampstead & Kilburn CLP

Sam Gisagara, BAME officer, Camden Town with Primrose Hill branch

Alice Gray, Camden Town with Primrose Hill branch

Owen Holland, Bloomsbury & Kings Cross branch

Agnes Kory, Hampstead & Kilburn CLP

Richard Kuper, Political Education & Training officer, Highgate branch

Marie Lynam, West Hampstead & Fortune Green branch, GC delegate GMB

Bernard Miller, Gospel Oak branch

Moshe Machover, Queen’s Park branch

Tom Muirhead, Hampstead & Kilburn CLP

Gareth Murphy, Kentish Town branch, GC delegate from Unite

Barbara Rosenbaum, Camden Town with Primrose Hill branch

Jo Rostron, Camden Town with Primrose Hill branch

Linda Sayle, GC delegate, Kings Cross & Bloomsbury branch

Amanda Sebestyen, GC delegate, Camden Town with Primrose Hill branch

Prof Tom Selwyn, Vice Chair, Camden Town with Primrose Hill branch

Labour Against the Witchhunt - Support Our Lobby of Labour’s National Executive Committee Tuesday 23rd January 11.00 a.m.

The Jewish Labour Movement Steps up the Fight Against ‘Anti-Semitism’ by Trying to Expel Black and Jewish anti-racists 

The Jewish Labour Movement, the British wing of the racist Israeli Labour Party, is seeking to remove critics of Israel and Zionism from the Labour Party - especially Jewish critics

 Jeremy Newmark, Chair of the Zionist Jewish Labour Movement has gone on the offensive after the shock over the removal of pro-Israeli toady Anne Black as Chair of Labour’s Disputes Committee. This was consequene of the victory of 3 Momentum members in last week’s elections to the NEC.

Her replacement, Christine Shawcroft has been viciously attacked, especially in the Jewish Chronicle, not least because she was my silent witness at my investigative hearing back in May 2016.

Black was a supporter of Labour Friends of Israel and it was she who suspended Labour Parties like Brighton and Wallasey at the whim of the Right, once they had been defeated in democratic electins.  Black acted as the rubber stamp for anti-Semitism referrals to Labour’s National Constitutional Committee.

The JLM are seeking to expel Black and Jewish activists Jackie Walker and Marc Wadsworth - all in the name of the right against 'anti-Semitism'

The Jewish Labour Movement are the British wing of the Israeli Labour Party which is in full support of Israel's deportation of 40,000 asylum seekers.

The Zionists and the right-wing have become more and more desperate to see Jackie Walker, Marc Wadsworth, Tony Greenstein and Ken Livingstone expelled.  It makes sense that the Zionists should seek to expel Black and Jewish anti-racists in the fight against ‘anti-Semitism’.

Why?  Because the ‘anti-Semitism’ that Newmark and the JLM are concerned with has nothing to do with hatred of Jews and everything to do with hatred of Zionism, Apartheid and the Israeli state.

If those who call for a continuation of Labour’s ‘anti-Semitism’ purge were at all concerned about fighting racism then they would turn their attention to the Israeli Labour Party, the JLM’s ‘sister’ party which is giving full support to Netanyahu’s deportation of 45,000 Black African asylum seekers for the crime of being Black and non-Jewish.  [see Israeli Labor sells out African refugees, as ‘infiltrators’, Ha’aretz 22.1.17.  Labor Party's Support of Deportation, Imprisonment of Asylum Seekers Cheapens the Israeli Opposition]

If there was an iota of truth to the allegation that Labour is swamped with anti-Semitism, then why are the most right-wing and racist tabloids in Britain - from the Sun, the Daily Express to the Daily Mail – so opposed to it?

All the most racist and right-wing newspapers in Britain are deeply concerned about 'antisemitism'

Even Richard Littlejohn, the most racist columnist in Britain now that Katie Hopkins has left the Daily Mail, is up in arms about ‘anti-Semitism’.  We can be sure it has nothing to do with anti-Jewish hatred and everything to do with support for the oppression of the Palestinians.  Allegations of ‘anti-Semitism’ are the normal abuse that supporters of the Palestinians and opponents of Israeli Apartheid receive.

Jeremy Newmark - the JLM Chair who is driving the witch hunt - at the Employment Tribunal Case of Fraser v University College Union he was found by the tribunal to have lied on oath

The fact that the attempt to expel good socialists and anti-racists from the Labour Party is trumpeted in every racist rag in Britain is in itself a reason why the NEC should suspend all disciplinary actions as and until the Chakrabarti proposals on natural justice have been implemented.  Small things like the right to know who your accusers are. 

It is important that we make it clear to Labour’s National Executive Committee that it is unacceptable for people to be expelled from the Labour Party at the urging of pro-Israeli racists.

Let Labour’s National Executive Committee know that there is no support amongst members of the Labour Party for a continuing witch-hunt of socialists and anti-racists.

Come and join us on Tuesday 23^rd January at 11.00 at Southside, Victoria Street, London SW1E 6QT

the Zionist idea of fighting 'antisemitism' is to attack genuine anti-racists