Open Letter to Labour’s NEC – How Long will the Chakrabarti Report be Ignored?

Why, after over 19 months, has Labour’s not Implemented the Chakrabarti Report Proposals for a fair Disciplinary Procedure?

I have been expelled on the basis of charges that relate solely to allegations and material that surfaced after I was suspended on March 18th 2016.  In paragraph 102 of the Skeleton Argument of the Labour Party's barrister, Thomas Ogg, be states:

102. All of the charges relate to conduct after Mr Greenstein's suspension from theLabour Party on 18 March 2016.

In other words I was suspended first and then the Compliance Unit looked around for evidence.  If that happened in a bourgeois court the charges would be thrown out for abuse of process.  In the Guidelines to the National Constitutional Committee, Appendix 6 Clause 6D Procedural matters at NEC or CLP level states:

i. The rules under which the NCC operates make it clear that the NCC and its panels are concerned only with the charge(s). The procedures adopted on behalf of the Party or a CLP in advance of a referral to the NCC are not matters for the NCC dealing with a particular case. The NCC is entitled to (and will) act on the basis that the charges are properly brought before them and cannot become embroiled in dealing with complaints about the administration of any investigation leading to the charges. Any such complaint will therefore not be entertained by the NCC or panel thereof unless it is material or relevant to the consideration of the evidence to be used by the presenter in support of the charges.

This is what I have termed the 'Turning a blind eye' clause.  Whatever the injustices perpetrated by Sam Matthews and the Compliance Unit, the NCC is obliged to ignore it except of course that in Chapter 9, Clause IX (4) the Rule Book lays down an obligation on the Labour Party to be fair:

4. The NCC or any panel thereof in hearing and determining charges against an individual shall have regard to procedural guidelines as determined by the NCC. The NCC shall have the power to supplement such guidelines from time to time and to modify its procedures in order to meet the circumstances of any particular case to ensure fairness to both the individual and the Party.

Below is a letter from members of the Labour Party in Holborn & St Pancras and Hampstead & Kilburn asking why, 19 months later, the Chakrabarti Report’s recommendations on a fair disciplinary process have not been implemented.

The Chakrabarti Report has gathered dust for the past 19 months as the Labour Right cannot openly oppose its recommendations on natural justice and fair process

We have seen Labour Parties such as Brighton and Hove and Wallasey suspended on the basis of outright lies.  See Warren Morgan, Emma Daniels & The Spitting Incident That Never Was - The Lies that led to the Overturning of Elections & the Suspension of Brighton & Hove Labour Party [see Labour party's tensions between left and right in focus in Brighton]

Brighton and Hove were suspended solely because, having lost democratic elections to Momentum candidates, the Right invented false allegations of spitting and intimidation.  In Wallasey, after the attempted coup by 172 MPs, Angela Eagle became the challenger to Corbyn. Wallasey CLP made it clear that they were going to back Jeremy Corbyn and the Labour Party headquarters responded by suspending the party.  The pretext was false accusations of homophobia which apparently took place at an AGM.  Now, after the dust has died down, these allegations have been quietly dropped because of course they were always without substance. 

The late and unlamented Iain McNicol and his servants were happy to suspend whole parties for the benefit of Progress and the 172 PLP traitors on the basis of outright lies.  We had the spectacle of the Disputes Committee investigator in Brighton, Katherine Buckingham refusing to look at the video of the alleged spitting incident on ‘data protection’ grounds.  The real reason was, of course, that it proved that the original allegations of spitting at the front entrance were complete lies and that Councillors Warren Morgan and Emma Daniels who made the original allegations were liars.

The Letter that Anne Black, recently deposed Chair of the Disputes Committee, sent to the suspended Brighton & Hove Labour Party - from the beginning Black assumed that the allegations were true, as can be seen in her final sentence

The Chakrabarti Report on Racism and Anti-Semitism in the Labour Party has gathered dust for over 18 months.  It made a comprehensive series of recommendations, basic principles that every court of law in the country takes for granted.  However for McNicol, the Compliance Unit and Labour’s civil service, the idea of according people accused of offences under the Labour Party constitution the basic right of knowing who your accusers are, what the charges are and the evidence against you is unthinkable.  These petty bureaucrats, who would not have been out of place in Stalin's Rusia, invent allegations against those they suspend and ‘auto exclude’ for naked political reasons on the flimsiest of pretexts.  The last thing they want are any written procedures.  Fairness doesn’t come in to it.   That is why the Chakrabarti recommendations have been comprehensively ignored.

One of the demands of Labour Against the Witch-hunt is that Chakrabarti is now implemented and we expect the  now left Labour NEC to do exactly that.

Katherine Buckingham sent out the above email but her real job was to ensure that the original decision to suspend Brighton & Hove Party was vindicated

Tony Greenstein

Letter to Labour's National Executive Committee

Sisters and Brothers

We have waited for 19 months for the Chakrabarti Enquiry’s recommendations to be put into practice, and give our party the fair disciplinary procedures it needs and deserves.  We hope that the NEC will make a start today by clearing David Watson of unfounded charges and letting him return to Walthamstow where he was a valued officer.

We have seen so many good comrades across the Labour Party suspended on the basis of anonymous accusations, and still waiting to be reinstated. There have been waves of factional purges which are shameful in a democratic party. First members were accused of being Green, then trade union militants, then antisemites and then transphobic. Accusations seem to have come down most heavily on people of colour, thus further excluding them from our party which we say that we want to reflect the society we live in.

We are all members of the Labour Party in Holborn & St Pancras and Hampstead & Kilburn. Many of us have Jewish heritage.  We are concerned for Labour in future government to have a real ethical foreign policy including international co-operation and fair trade. This includes confronting the internationally condemned actions of the state of Israel and reining in its unfair trade privileges, creating equal rights for Palestinian citizens and more. We strongly deny that supporting the international nonviolent campaign of boycott, divestment and sanctions is antisemitic, or that questioning the colonising actions of Israel shows that the Labour Party harbours hatred of Jews. This is not our experience.

We are still waiting for suspended active members like David Watson to get a fair hearing and be reinstated. We need their abilities to win the next election.

23 January 2018

Signed (in alphabetical order)

Ruth Appleton, Highgate branch, GC delegate from Unite

Simon Burton, Kings Cross branch

Prof Miriam E David, Highgate branch

Daphne Davies, Kings Cross branch

Harriet Evans, Vice-Chair, Highgate branch

Pete Firmin, CWU delegate, Hampstead & Kilburn CLP

Sam Gisagara, BAME officer, Camden Town with Primrose Hill branch

Alice Gray, Camden Town with Primrose Hill branch

Owen Holland, Bloomsbury & Kings Cross branch

Agnes Kory, Hampstead & Kilburn CLP

Richard Kuper, Political Education & Training officer, Highgate branch

Marie Lynam, West Hampstead & Fortune Green branch, GC delegate GMB

Bernard Miller, Gospel Oak branch

Moshe Machover, Queen’s Park branch

Tom Muirhead, Hampstead & Kilburn CLP

Gareth Murphy, Kentish Town branch, GC delegate from Unite

Barbara Rosenbaum, Camden Town with Primrose Hill branch

Jo Rostron, Camden Town with Primrose Hill branch

Linda Sayle, GC delegate, Kings Cross & Bloomsbury branch

Amanda Sebestyen, GC delegate, Camden Town with Primrose Hill branch

Prof Tom Selwyn, Vice Chair, Camden Town with Primrose Hill branch

Letter to National Executive Members of the Labour Party - 4 Democratic Demands

Reverse Progress's Attempt to Stop 25% of Labour's Membership Voting 4 Leader 

Stop the £25 Surcharge on Democracy

Don't Ban Labour Party Meetings

Reinstate Brighton & Hove District Labour Party

As you may know, the Labour Party National Executive Meeting last Tuesday voted, after Corbyn and others on the Left had left the meeting, to prevent 130,000 new members voting.  They also voted to increase the cost to registered supporters from £3 to £25 and in a final flourish voted to ban all party meetings for the duration of the campaign.

Last Thursday we learnt that Brighton and Hove Labour Party had been suspended and the Executive that had been voted out at the previous Saturday's AGM reinstated, despite the new Exec. receiving 66% of the vote.

A group of us who are currently suspended from membership are sending this letter to members of the NEC and, if you are members of the Labour Party, we would like to invite you to sign it.

If you agree to sign it please respond to me or the email address on the letter and also put your CLP after your name.

thanks

Tony Greenstein

Saturday, 16 July 2016

Dear National Executive Member,

We are writing to you in respect of this Tuesday’s National Executive Committee meeting. 

At last week’s meeting of the NEC a number of anti-democratic decisions were taken at the very end of the meeting, under Any Other Business.  These proposals were tabled without any notice have been given, when many members had already left the meeting.  The effect of these decisions were to prevent nearly 130,000 new members of the Labour Party from voting in the leadership elections. 

Registered supporters have also been prevented from voting unless they pay a £25 surcharge.  In addition all party meetings have been banned until the leadership election is over.

These measures demonstrate that the Right of the Party and Progress are opposed to the most basic democratic principles.  What possible justification can there be for preventing nearly a quarter of the membership voting to choose a new leader?  What justification is there for banning meetings or making it impossible for people living in poverty from voting?  What are they scared of?

We urge you to reverse all these proposals, as you are fully entitled to do, at the forthcoming National Executive Meeting.  We would also ask you to reverse the decision to flout the democratic will of party members in Brighton and Hove District Labour Party, whose party has been suspended and whose election results have been annulled, because of complaints from those who took part in but lost the elections for a new Executive.  The largest ever meeting in the history of the Brighton and Hove District Party voted by nearly 2-1 in favour of a new Executive.  To overturn this vote, without even a cursory investigation, on the basis of unsubstantiated allegations from Progress supporters is an affront to democracy.

In Solidarity,