Dr Rahmeh’s Only Offence is Being a Palestinian & Opposing the Genocide that Starmer & Streeting Have Enabled
IF you are JEWISH please sign the
Link here
https://forms.gle/cnVMGb2ubD3edKY97
Video of the Arrest of Dr Rahmeh Aladwan
Last Tuesday, Dr Rahmeh Aladwan was arrested by the
Metropolitan Police for three offences of making malicious communications and
one offence of inciting racial hatred. What was the basis of these allegations?
Well the Police officer arresting her told Rahmeh that on 21 July, at a
demonstration outside the Foreign & Commonwealth Office she called for the
eradication of the State of Israel.
Since when have calls for eradicating the
genocidal and apartheid Israeli state been tantamount to inciting racial hatred
or ‘anti-Semitism’? This could only be a possible offence if there is an
inseparable link between Israeli Apartheid and British Jews. Clearly the
numbskulls of the Metropolitan Police, especially their racist Commissioner
Mark Rowley, have never heard of anti-Zionist Jews.
British police arrest doctor for opposing Gaza genocide, with Asa Winstanley
So a question to those who dreamt up these
charges. Were calls to abolish the Nazi state an example of anti-German
racism? Or calls to abolish or eradicate
the Apartheid South African State anti-White racism? To merely ask the question is to answer it.
If anyone is being anti-Semitic it is the
Metropolitan Police, who never lose an opportunity to link British Jews with
Zionism’s genocide. It should never be forgotten that when Hitler was alive and
kicking his disciples in the form of the British Union of Fascists were
marching through the Jewish East End of London protected
by the same Met Police who are now so concerned with ‘anti-Semitism’.
The Met are no more concerned about
anti-Semitism than they are about any other form of racism. The Met are a
cesspit of racism. They have repeatedly been found to be institutionally racist
by the MacPherson
Inquiry into the murder of Stephen Lawrence and even by Thatcherite Baronness
Louise Casey. Only in the past month Police at Charing Cross Police have
been caught out up to their old tricks in a Panorama programme.
The sincerity of the Met can be gauged by the
fact that they haven’t arrested a single Zionist for glorifying in and denying
the genocide that Israel is carrying out in Gaza. If the government denies there
is a genocide then why should the Met contradict them?
Although Rahmeh has been the target of the
viciously racist pro-Israel lobby – the so-called Campaign Against Antisemitism and the
equally poisonous UK Lawyers for Israel
[UKLFI], it is the British state that has moved into action. Jews for them are a convenient alibi and
pretext. The attack on Palestine solidarity activists is because British
foreign policy is joined at the hip with that of the United States and Israel.
It is important not to invert this and believe
that the British state is acting on behalf of the Israeli state and its stooges
like the Board of Deputies. British imperialism
has always been pro-Zionist as has the United States. Israel is their racist Rottweiler in the
Middle East.
Dr Radwan’s treatment has been disgraceful,
even by British standards. In effect, having been found not guilty at her first
hearing that despicable apology for a human being, the corrupt
Wes Streeting demanded a rehearing of the charges. See here.
The UK 'israel' lobby has pressured my government and medical board into referring me to a tribunal hearing to try and suspend me for opposing genocide. This is Britain. We are occupied.
— Dr Rahmeh Aladwan (@doctor_rahmeh) August 28, 2025
Hi. My name is Rahmeh. I am a part-Palestinian British NHS doctor. I am facing the… pic.twitter.com/hR9U90g42o
A Google search produces this entry yet the page can't be found
Dr Radwan was first referred to a hearing of
the Medical Practitioner Tribunal Service by the General Medical Council [GMC] on
27 August. At the hearing on 25
September the GMC asked for conditions to be placed on Dr Radwan’s practice and
the MPTS refused. She was found to have no case to answer. It appears that this
decision has been scrubbed
from the Internet. Although it appears in a Google search the page itself has disappeared.
The Tribunal found
that
·
There was no
evidence that patient safety had been put at risk.
·
The GMC’s concerns
arose solely from political statements, not from Dr Aladwan’s clinical
practice, which remains unblemished.
·
A “reasonable and
fully informed member of the public” would not be alarmed to learn that she
continued unrestricted practice while the investigation proceeds.
In Place of the Missing Page
There was a fierce backlash from Streeting,
who only held
his seat in Ilford North by 500 votes, against the British Palestinian
Leanne Mohammed. On 6 October Streeting was quoted
in The Times as calling for medical
institutions to ‘crack down on
antisemitism’.
The issue was posed in terms of the danger to
Jewish patients. Streeting warned that hospitals and medical institutions are “completely failing to protect Jewish
patients”. The fact that these lies are carried without comment demonstrates
the lengths the British press is willing to go to support Israel. There isn’t
one verifiable example of a doctor with Palestinian sympathies injuring or
failing to care for someone who is Jewish. Not one example.
However the treatment of Black and Muslim
people in the NHS is a different matter. A third of Black and Ethnic Minority
staff face
racist abuse at work. Not that you would know from Streeting’s comments.
His only concern are for a section of White people. His allegations are completely unevidenced
but were nonetheless seized upon by the Tory press.
The first ten NHS doctors to
die of COVID were predominantly Muslim and from either a Black, Asian or
Arabic background. Black and minority ethnic people are 40 percent more
likely to access mental health services via the criminal justice system
than white people. But this kind of racism is not something that Streeting, The Times or Telegraph is
concerned with.
After a campaign
by the Israel funded, so-called Campaign
Against Antisemitism [CAA] (which is really a Campaign
Against the Palestinians) the GMC rereferred Dr Aladwan’s case back to the
MPTS on 3 October. A hearing of the MPTS
was held on 23 October and the MPTS agreed
to hear the case again although it had already dismissed it previously.
At the second hearing on 23 Oct the GMC asked
for the suspension of Dr Aladwan and the inclusion of all material from first
hearing, which the MPTS agreed to. This is going to go ahead to a 3 day
hearing date on a date yet to be confirmed. The GMC even want to add
material they had before the first hearing but didn't submit. The video below
and also this tweet
explains the whole of this torturous attempt at the crucifixion of Dr Aladwan.
Dr Rahmeh Aladwan's Instagram Post Explaining
the Background to her Case Before the MPTS
One factor in all of this has been the supine
behaviour of the GMC which has done its
best to persecute Dr Aladwan. Yet when
it comes to genuine anti-Semitism from Zionists it behaves entirely
differently. On 21 January 2024 I received a message from a Justin Stebbing
which read:
At first I thought it was either from a neo-Nazi or a lunatic or
both. I wasn’t far wrong. He is a lunatic Zionist. Justin Stebbing is a
visiting professor at Imperial College and he is still listed on their website.
It is interesting to contrast the witch-hunt against Dr Aladwan, who
hasn’t made any remotely similar comments with that of Stebbing. Imperial
College in the form of HR Director, Harbhajan Brar, refused to do anything. I complained to the Met Police
who were also reluctant to do anything. Eventually Sussex Police referred a
complaint to the Crown Prosecution Service who also refused to do
anything. The Police Officer in the case
informed me that the CPS had concluded that
a jury would be unlikely to conclude that he meant what he said
literally, based on the surrounding circumstances, so there was no realistic
prospect of conviction if the matter went to court.
Stebbing claimed that his remarks were ironic
and he hadn’t meant them. There was nothing ironic about them. Sending someone
Jewish an email out of the blue (because I’d never had contact with this
reptile before) saying that all Jews should be gassed is clearly malicious as
per the Malicious Communications Act under which Dr Radwan has been arrested.
But of course the CPS is a highly political animal and it knows better than to
prosecute a prominent Zionist.
I also complained to the GMC. Given their
hyper activity in Dr Radwan’s case one might suppose that they would have been
eager to suspend Stebbing. It was not as if he didn’t have form. In December
2021 he was suspended
by the MPTS for nine months.
Stebbing was guilty of a “cavalier” approach
in the way he treated some patients. This including sending
“inappropriate” emails to a dying patient he nicknamed LMT (Little Miss
Trouble). It would seem that I wasn’t the first victim of Stebbing.
But in my case the GMC exonerated him without
even a reprimand. Stebbing was defended by UKLFI and by the CAA. So what we have are the two most prominent
Zionist organisations involved in making false ‘anti-Semitism’ allegations against
Palestinian supporters defending someone guilty of making vile anti-Semitic comments
about gassing Jews. This is par for the course with Zionists. They have never had
any objection to genuine anti-Semitism, only anti-Zionism.
In the process the CAA/UKLFI alleged that I
had been found guilty of being a ‘notorious anti-Semite’ myself when I made an
unsuccessful libel claim against the CAA. However even the GMC was aware that
in libel a defence of honest opinion merely finds the libel hasn’t been proven,
not that it was correct. This in itself is an indication of the dishonesty of
these Zionist organisations. The GMC nonetheless
found that
Yet despite this finding the GMC declined to apply any penalty. The
contrast with Dr Radwan, who has made no offensive remarks to anyone Jewish,
even if some of her comments regarding ‘Jewish supremacy’ may be over the top,
is astonishing. It is as clear a case of double standards as one could hope to
find.
The justification for not imposing a warning on Stebbing is equally
astonishing:
The double standards are self-evident. Criticism of Israel and Zionism
is a hanging offence. Telling someone Jewish that all Jews should have been
gassed is something that can be treated leniently. Incidentally the blacked out
portions of the decision almost certainly relate to Stebbing’s previous
striking off from the register which suggest that such an emotionally charged
man is certainly not someone who should be near patients. Again in contrast to Dr Aladwan who has
handled herself with great aplomb and poise.
The full GMC decision can be downloaded here.
It is clear from the behaviour of the Police, CPS, GMC and Imperial
College that when it comes to genuine anti-Semitism from Zionists and supporters
of Israel, then the traditional defences go up.
Accusations of false anti-Semitism when made in support of Genocide in
Palestine are, by contrast, treated seriously.
The lesson to draw from this is that the purported concern over
anti-Semitism by the Met Police and the State in this and other cases is
entirely spurious. Likewise the defence of Stebbing by the CAA and UKLFI demonstrates
that these organisations are only interested in ‘anti-Semitism’ when defence of
Israel is on the agenda.
This should also be a lesson to those in the Palestine solidarity
movement who believe that the British state is genuinely concerned with
anti-Semitism. It is the same with Donald Trump in the United States
whose racism is a matter of record. But when it comes to ‘anti-Semitism’ and
the ‘plight’ of Zionist Jewish students on campus Trump was so concerned
that he threatened universities with defunding unless they fell into line and
policed discourse on campus, in particular courses covering the Middle East.
Just as an addendum. Rahmeh has
attributed support for Israel amongst British Jews to ‘Jewish
Supremacism’. I think this is wrong. The
reasons why British Jews have tended to support Israel are complex but racial
superiority is confined to a minority of Zionist zealots such as Jonathan
Hoffman.
The Jewish community in Britain has moved decisively to the right since
1945 when half
the vote for Phil Piratin, the Communist candidate in the Mile End
constituency in the East End, resulted in the first Jewish Communist MP.
In 1979 when both a Communist and a National Front candidate stood in
Hackney North at the General Election, Professor Geoffrey Alderman could not
discern a single Jewish vote for the Communist but estimated that a few hundred
Jews voted for the holocaust denying National Front.
Zionism as a settler colonial and imperialist ideology is clearly
attractive to those on the right. Coupled with its sense of victimhood arising
out of the weaponisation of the holocaust, British Jews have been complicit in
enabling Starmer and Lammy to support Israel’s genocide. However it would be
wrong to ascribe the support of the British state to either the Zionist lobby
or British Jews. The latter are the State’s moral alibi. It is not why the
British state supports Israel.
Notwithstanding the above it is incumbent upon anti-Zionist Jews to give
their full support to Rahmeh in her battles with the Medical Establishment and
the Metropolitan Police. She is being attacked, not because of anti-Semitism
but because she is a supporter of the Palestinians.
Tony Greenstein
