For Six Months, 6 Palestinian Villages Had Running Water.
Israel’s Army, ‘the most moral in the
world’ Put a Stop to It
If you want to know what
the IHRA and Labour’s ‘anti-Semitism’ witch-hunt is about, then you could do
worse than read the 3 articles below. Human life is not possible without water
and that is why Israel is making it as hard as possible for Palestinians to
have direct access to clean, running water. The intent behind their poisoning of
Palestinian water sources, the theft of their aquifer water and the destruction
of water pipes that enable the transmission of water is simple - transfer.
Israel's hostility to
Palestinian obtaining water, such that they are forced to pay for their own
water, is ethnic cleansing. But if you dare to say this then Jon Lansman, Owen Jones and Jennie Formby will call you an 'anti-Semite'. It is what is called a 'trope'.
Making mendacious,
dehumanizing, demonizing, or stereotypical allegations about Jews as such or
the power of Jews as collective — such as, especially but not exclusively, the
myth about a world Jewish conspiracy or of Jews controlling the media, economy,
government or other societal institutions.
There is no doubt that the allegations made
against Jews in the Middle Ages were without substance. It was the product
of superstition, Christian anti-Semitism and the need for a scapegoat to
explain e.g. the Black Death.
Palestinian accusations of water theft and poisoning are treated as 'antisemitic' by Israel's right-wing Jerusalem Post because of false accusations against Jews in the Middle Ages
However Israel is not a Jew. It is a settler-colonial state, 'Jewish' only in so far as Jews
are privileged. It is also a documented fact that Israel does poison
Palestinian wells, water and farmland.
In February 2015 the Board of Deputies' then Treasurer,
Laurence Brass saw a rusty car that settlers had pushed into a Palestinian
well. According to the IHRA Laurence Brass is anti-Semitic, for reporting what he saw!
Brass, who had gone on a trip to the West Bank, saw things that shocked him. Yet he was viciously and bitterly criticised for having spoken out.
Brass is a liberal Zionist, a member of Yachad with a house in Israel. He is no left-winger yet what he described should have prompted the Board, if they had any sense of ethics and values, as opposed to seeing their role as an Israeli Solidarity Society, to protest. Instead Brass was forced to resign.
As Laurance Brass Demonstrated You Cannot Oppose Israel's Racist Treatment of Palestinians and remain an Officer of the Board of Deputies
“The village spokesman told us that he was very worried at the prospect of local Palestinian children being attacked by settlers on their way to school.
"Just 48 hours after we left, a six-year-old girl from the neighbouring village of Atuwani was admitted to hospital with head wounds after being stoned on her way to school, just as we had been warned might occur.
“I was shocked that this type of behaviour goes unchecked by the IDF.”
Mr Brass added that the abiding memory of his visit would be “the sight of an old rusty car being dumped down the village well, thus preventing the locals from having fresh water.
“I had also not known previously that, on the majority of the road signs in the area, the Arabic words have been deliberately obliterated. I had also not previously appreciated the ever increasing number of settler outposts which have sprung up all over Area C, which, although illegal, no one appears willing to prevent.”
Mr Brass said:
“The miserable existence of the Palestinian villagers we met will stay with me for a long time. It was difficult to reconcile that we were celebrating the festival of freedom, while these villagers were surviving in such squalid surroundings. I returned very depressed.”
Yet the Israel lobby, people who, like Luke Akehurst, are paid large salaries, defend this behaviour. Their argument is that it is 'illegal' to build water pipes. Strange no Jewish settlers aren't prosecuted. Even stranger the Israeli army has never entered a settlement and destroyed their water pipes!
But if you dare to mention ‘Israel Lobby’ Jennie Formby, Lansman and their faithful mouthpiece Owen Jones, will accuse you of ‘anti-Semitism’ as will Nareser Osei (nareser.osei@newham.gov.uk) the despicable woman who is the leading witch-hunter of socialists and Palestinian supporters at Labour HQ at Southside.
‘There have been countless occasions over the last six years when I’ve been bursting to criticise the Israeli administration, but I’ve restrained myself.
“I want to be released from the chains of office to contribute to the wider debate on the Middle East, as well as on the critical political issues that I consider to be important here at home.”
We reach the absurd situation, as a result
of the fake anti-semitism campaign, that something might be antisemitic even if
it's true! The idea that antisemitism
is based on the truth is itself anti-Semitic but that is the situation that the
adoption of the IHRA has led the Labour Party into.
Israeli bulldozer sets about destroying water infrastructure - this is why Israel's army is 'the most moral in the world'
Destruction
of Palestinian Water Infrastructure
What possible reason could there be for Israeli forces to arrive
in force, with excavating equipment, at the village of Tuwani in the South
Hebron Hills, to dig up European Union funded pipes that had been laid to
supply water to six villages and over a thousand people.
If you want to know why Israel is an apartheid state then all you
need to do is to contrast the settlements, with their unlimited supply of
(stolen) water with the water shortage that Palestinian communities experience.
This is what the Board of Deputies ‘anti-Semitism’ campaign is
really about. After all, section 3 (d) of the Board’s
Constitution under Aims, Purposes and Power contains the following clause:
Take such appropriate action as lies within its power to advance Israel's security, welfare and standing.
The Board of
Deputies’s ‘concern’ about anti-Semitism is in reality a concern or defending
Israel right or wrong. The Board has never
criticised racism in Israel still less the Zionist ideology that justifies it.
Palestinian children fill plastic gallons with drinking water from a vendor in Khan Younis. (AP)
There
is only question one needs to ask.
What kind of state would
uproot and destroy pipes carrying clean water to a Palestinian village?
It is a measure of the
toothlessness of the European Union that instead of taking the cost of the
equipment they destroyed from grants they give Israel, they continue to defend
Israel as a 'democracy'.
However
we should remember that it’s not just Palestinians in the Occupied Territories
who suffer from water shortage. Half of
Israel’s Arab villages are ‘unrecognised’ and that means they have neither
sewage or any other sort of facility, including electricity and running water. Could this happen to a Jewish community? Of course not. Israel is a Jewish state and therefore ALL Jewish communities are
automatically recognised.
This
is the kind of visceral racism that the Labour Party is defending
today in its fight against ‘anti-Semitism’
For six months, Palestinian villagers living on West
Bank land that Israel deems a closed firing range saw their dream of running
water come true. Then the Civil Administration put an end to it
On
February 13, 2019, Israeli forces arrived near the village of a-Tuwani in the
South Hebron Hills. The forces used excavating equipment to unearth and destroy
stretch of pipe, which was laid just months ago and supplied water to over
1,000 Palestinians. Residents say that without the system, “water has become
every family’s largest expense.”
The dream that came true, in
the form of a two-inch water line, was too good to be true. For about six
months, 12 Palestinian West Bank villages in the South Hebron Hills enjoyed
clean running water. That was until February 13, when staff from the Israeli Civil Administration,
accompanied by soldiers and Border Police and
a couple of bulldozers, arrived.
The troops dug up the pipes,
cut and sawed them apart and watched the jets of water that spurted out. About
350 cubic meters of water were wasted. Of a 20 kilometer long (12 mile) network,
the Civil Administration confiscated remnants and sections of a total of about
6 kilometers of piping. They loaded them on four garbage trucks emblazoned with
the name of the Tel Aviv suburb of Ramat Gan on them.
The demolition work lasted six
and a half hours. Construction of the water line network had taken about four
months. It had been a clear act of civil rebellion in the spirit of Mahatma
Gandhi and Martin Luther King against one of the most brutal bans that Israel
imposes on Palestinian communities in Area C, the portion of the West Bank
under full Israeli control. It bars Palestinians from hooking into existing
water infrastructure.
A little background
The residential caves in the Masafer Yatta village region
south of Hebron and the ancient cisterns used for collecting rainwater confirm
the local residents’ claim that their villages have existed for decades, long
before the founding of the State of Israel. In the 1970s, Israel declared some
30,000 dunams (7,500 acres) in the area Firing Range 918.
In 1999, under the auspices of
the negotiations between Israel and the Palestinian Authority, the army
expelled the residents of the villages and demolished their structures and
water cisterns. The government claimed that the residents were trespassing on
the firing range, even though these were their lands and they have lived in the
area long before the West Bank was captured by Israel.
When the matter was brought to
the High Court of Justice, the
court approved a partial return to the villages but did not allow construction
or hookups to utility infrastructure. Mediation attempts failed, because the
state was demanding that the residents leave their villages and live in the
West Bank town of Yatta and come to graze their flocks and work their land only
on a few specific days per year.
But the residents
continued to live in their homes, risking military raids and demolition action
— including the demolition of public facilities such as schools, medical
clinics and even toilets. They give up a lot to maintain their way of life as
shepherds, but could not forgo water.
“The rainy season has grown
much shorter in recent years, to only about 45 days a year,” explained Nidal Younes, the chairman of
the Masafer Yatta council of villages. “In the past, we didn’t immediately
fill the cisterns with rainwater, allowing them to be washed and cleaned first.
Since the amount of rain has decreased, people stored water right away. It
turns out the dirty water harmed the sheep and the people.”
Among many otherproblematic aspects of
the Trump administration’s peace plan for the
Middle East, one glaring fault is its lack of any serious attention to the
contentious question of how to divide up precious water resources between the
Israelis and Palestinians.
One of the many
reasons that the Palestinian leadership dismissed the proposal
out of hand was that it included a demand for Palestinians to cede the
water-rich West Bank and the entire Jordan Valley to Israel.
“What
struck me when I looked at the plan is how devoid it was of a historical
context. There was no recognition of the past agreements that dealt with water,
or recognition of the steps that had been put into place to allow for water
sharing, or recognition of water rights,”
said Erika Weinthal,
an expert on water politics and conflict at Duke University.
Access to water has for
decades been at the heart of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and many regional
tensions more broadly. The arid region has limited supplies of water that are
increasingly in demand for agriculture, and what water exists is largely shared
across national boundaries, including the Jordan River and the critical
underground aquifers in the West Bank and near the Gaza Strip.
That geology and geography
helps explain why water conflicts have been behind a lot of the region’s
sharpest clashes for centuries and even millennia, going back to when the
biblical Isaac and the Philistines fought over access to water wells. More
recently, former Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon blamed water for
ultimately sparking the Six-Day War
in 1967.
Since 1967, water has
remained a big irritant in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict in part because
Israel made control of access to water a cornerstone of its approach to the
Palestinians. Water access for Palestinians in the West Bank is limited enough,
with catastrophic impacts on farmers, whose rain-watered fields yield smaller
and less valuable harvests than the lush fields of their water-rich neighbors.
In the Gaza Strip, the situation is genuinely dire: More than 90 percent of the
water is unfit for human
consumption, and the sole aquifer is being invaded by seawater.
“Water
is always mentioned as one of the core issues in the conflict—not as high as
Jerusalem or the question of refugees, but it’s always been one of the core
issues,”
said Clive Lipchin,
the director of the Center for Transboundary Water Management at the Arava
Institute for Environmental Studies in Israel.
Hence it is odd that there
is no real discussion about how to share water resources between Israel and the
Palestinians in the plan proposed last month by U.S. President Donald Trump’s
son-in-law, Jared Kushner. (Although, since Kushner deliberately refused to discuss any
of the region’s history while working on the plan, it may not be that
surprising.) Water was the third of seven major pillars in the 1994 peace agreement between
Israel and Jordan, and water was a central part of the 1995 Oslo Accords, the
closest the two sides have come to finalizing a deal that would eventually see
the creation of a Palestinian state.
In contrast, water was
allotted a single paragraph in Kushner’s blueprint, just after plans for
building a tourist resort on the Dead Sea. Decades of bitter fights over who
should get access to how much water, and years of Israel’s use of water as a
tool to bolster the viability of its West Bank settlements while strangling
Palestinian farmers, was dismissed thus in the White House plan: “The
parties will work together in good faith to manage the details with respect to
water and wastewater treatment issues.”
The remnants of deals
related to water rights and water allocation in the Oslo Accords remain in
effect to this day. But water is still a hot-button issue between the Israelis
and Palestinians for two big reasons.
First, the Oslo commitments
on paper regarding Palestinians’ access to water were never ultimately
consummated in the hoped-for final agreement. That has left Israel in ultimate
control of Palestinians’ access to water, whether from the Jordan Valley or the
plentiful Mountain Aquifer. New Palestinian wells, for example, or irrigation
systems or wastewater plants all require Israeli signoff, which almost never
comes, leaving Palestinians’ water infrastructure woefully
underdeveloped compared to that of their settler neighbors. By some estimates, Israelis use
more than 80 percent of the water in the West Bank, leaving only a fraction for
Palestinians. [in other words settlers, who make up 20% of the population
use 80% of the water - TG]
Second, the water crunch
has only grown more acute in the 25 years since the Oslo accords were signed.
The Palestinian population has grown and with it demand for water, while
Israeli allocations of water rights agreed to in the 1990s have hardly changed,
Lipchin noted.
That’s why the Trump administration’s proposal, which talks a lot
about supercharging the Palestinian economy through international investment
and the creation of high-tech manufacturing zones, is jarring to many experts.
It doesn’t take into account the fundamental requirements that Palestinians in
Gaza need simply to find clean water to drink and bathe, or that West Bank
farmers need to irrigate crops that could provide a livelihood.
If some version of the
Trump proposal were implemented, including Israel’s now-greenlighted annexation
of the entire Jordan River Valley, those water inequities would only grow.
Weinthal has written previously of the securitization of water,
where Israel controls access to the vital resource to bolster its own security
and weaken Palestinian communities.
“This is
a plan that continues to ignore any form of effective diplomacy, holding water
and infrastructure hostage to the conflict, rather than prioritizing the basic
human needs of the Palestinian population,” she said. “At the end of the day, water is a basic human need
and a basic human right that should not be held hostage to the conflict or that
makes one party acquiesce.”
Could technology come to
the rescue and end the ages-old fight over wells and water? In recent years,
Israel has made huge strides in bolstering its own water security thanks to big
investments in desalination plants, which turn Mediterranean seawater into
another source of freshwater. The Trump plan, too, speaks of new big
investments by both parties in desalination plants that could provide ample
supplies of water, with an eye, perhaps, to sidestepping the fight over
precious groundwater resources and removing one of the roadblocks to a final
agreement.
The Arava Institute’s
Lipchin doesn’t buy it.
“Desalination will never take away water as a
source of conflict,”
he said.
“While it’s a fact that
Israel is much more water secure because of technologies including
desalination, Israel will never relinquish its rights to the natural
resources—those are always going to be the preferred source of water, and
always going to be looked at and managed as a buffer in any crisis that may
arise.”
The plan’s vision of a
booming, peaceful, prosperous Palestine—even one under Israeli security
tutelage and with little access to the outside world—is hard to square with a
future state that will be still be wholly dependent on its neighbor for access
to water to which it has a legitimate claim, Lipchin said. Water, as much as
control over borders and airspace that are also lacking in the Trump plan, is
the stuff sovereignty is made of.
“If
you’re talking about a viable and independent state, obviously you need to have
control over your natural resources,” he said. “What kind of state is
this going to be?”
Keith Johnson is a senior staff writer at Foreign
Policy. Twitter: @KFJ_FP
Palestinian medical workers tend to wounded children, members of a family where six were killed in an Israeli airstrike in central Gaza Strip on November 14, 2019. (Photo by AFP)
Gaza has become “uninhabitable,” not because of ecological
disaster or Palestinian poor stewardship of the land, but because Israel
chooses to destroy it by every means – poisoning, starvation, disease, poverty,
medical neglect, and invasion – while the world stands silent. (Read this for examples of atrocities)
by
Robert Inlakesh,
We have now
entered 2020, the year in which experts at the United Nations (UN) once
predicted Gaza would become unliveable. But the sad reality is not only that
those same experts said that Gaza was already unliveable in 2017, but that now
the population of 2 million residing in Gaza are under the real threat of
genocide.
Sara Roy of
Harvard University’s Centre for Middle Eastern studies, who is considered the
leading scholar on Gaza’s economy, has written that “innocent human beings,
most of them young, are slowly being poisoned in Gaza by the water they drink
and likely by the soil in which they plant.” So let us break down that
statement, based upon the data available to us.
Facts on the ground
The population
of the Gaza Strip is over 2 million strong, more than 50% of which are children
(18 and under). Ninety-seven percent of Gaza’s water is undrinkable with only
the upper 10% of Gaza’s population having access to clean water according to
the UN. If we take these statistics and we look at them critically that would
mean that according to conservative estimates only 40% of Gaza’s children are
consuming water that is fit for human consumption. This means that parents in
the Gaza Strip are forced to make the decision to allow their children to drink
contaminated water in order for them to survive.
Gaza humanitarian crisis: A Palestinian woman gives water to her son in Khan Younis in the southern Gaza Strip December 19, 2018. (REUTERS/Ibraheem Abu Mustafa - RC1E7E1A8CD
Israel, which has
enforced its illegal blockade of Gaza since 2006 – although Zionist
propagandists claim it started in June of 2007, which is incorrect – is under
international law required to provide Gaza with the ability to sustain itself.
Gaza is not a State; it is not a sovereign territory in of itself. According to
the UN Gaza constitutes part of what is called the Palestinian occupied
territories, with the focus here being on the word “occupied.”
According to
the 4th Geneva Convention, Israel is required under International Law to
provide the ability for Gaza and the West Bank to sustain an environment of
liveability. Israel will argue, however, that Gaza specifically is not
occupied; that it withdrew in 2005. However Israel still controls the
population registry, the entries and exits, all imports and exports, the
electromagnetic sphere, the armistice lines (what Israel calls the border), the
territorial waters, airspace as well as having a monopoly on the electricity in
Gaza. Israel controls Gaza through and through; meaning that if Israel does not
declare an occupation, it is a de facto annexation of the territory.
Shocking realities
In excess of 108,000 cubic meters of untreated sewage water flows into
the Mediterranean Sea from Gaza. This is due to a lack of power for Gaza’s
desalination plant and the lack of building material required to expand, both
of which are due to Israel’s policies towards the besieged coastal enclave. The
situation is so bad that not only is Gaza’s sea water heavily contaminated,
leading to deaths as recently as last year, but also Israel’s Askalan
(Ashkelon) based desalination plant periodically halts operations due to the
pollution, showing that Israel is willing to put the purification of 20% of its
own water at jeopardy in order to punish the Gaza Strip.
Arising from
the problem of water contamination is also disease. Gideon Grumberg, the
founder and director of Israel’s ‘Ecopeace’, told the Jerusalem Post in 2016 that Gaza is a ticking time
bomb for cholera and typhoid epidemics. Since then there have been repeated
calls for a change to be made to Gaza’s lack of clean water by various experts.
If a change is not made in 2020 then Gaza could become a hotbed for disease the
way that Yemen has, again due to an illegally imposed blockade.
Beyond the
water problem are also numerous other issues plaguing Gaza, all of which are
again due to Israel’s illegally imposed – for nearly 15 years now – siege.
Upwards of 80% of Gaza’s population are reliant upon international food aid in
order to survive, with Israel enforcing a policy of “putting the people of Gaza
on a diet,” entailing that Israel counts the minimum caloric intake for the
Gazan population to stay alive. Israel of course controls the food aid coming
into the Gaza Strip and even makes a profit off of it. The restrictions Israel
applies to food coming into Gaza is also used as a political tool in order to
punish the Palestinians for their acts of resistance against Israel.
The
conservative estimates, according to the United Nations, also indicate that
Gaza’s youth unemployment rate is close to hitting 70% with an overall
unemployment rate recorded to be at around 50%. Israel also has repeatedly
blocked Palestinian cancer patients from entering Israel in order to receive
life-saving treatment. Not only this, but due to the lack of power in Gaza,
cardiac monitors and X-ray machines become unreliable. In the first half of
2019, the Gaza Health Ministry, which has a regular budget of $40 million a
year, had only 10 million dollars worth of supplies available to them and in
July (2019) declared a warning of an unprecedented shortage of medicine and
medical supplies. According to the World Health Organization 39% of Gaza applications for cancer patients to exit the
blockaded Strip were “unsuccessful” in 2018.
A Palestinian man and boy navigate the streets of Gaza City, which are flooded with sewage. (Mohammed Salem/Reuters)
Gaza’s
population is subjected to sewage regularly flooding, after rainfall, into the
streets and causing sickness, especially amongst the poorer population. Even
the more well-off, financially, of Gaza’s population, some of which reside in
areas such as Gaza City (North East Gaza), are losing their wealth.
Specifically the residents of the al-Rimal area, who are viewed by many as
living in an area of prestige are having to flee to places like Istanbul, or
become refugees abroad and are losing their families assets due to an absence
of income.
Gaza currently
survives on a few hours of electricity per day, this is due to the fact that
Israel put a cap on the amount of electricity it allows into Gaza, as well as
the fact that Israel has bombarded and destroyed Gaza’s electrical grid and
power plants, on various occasions. The sole, partially destroyed by
bombardment, power plant in Gaza is also in a semi-operational state due to the
cutting of diesel fuel from the Strip in early 2018, after the Palestinian
Authority stopped paying for the fuel.
As of February
2018, the Gaza Strip has been in a “state of emergency.” Enduring, since the
beginning of the siege, eight large-scale military offensive massacres by
Israel, with hundreds of smaller bombardments coming in between.
A 17 year old
in Gaza would have experienced Israeli internal occupation, a 15 year long ever
tightening siege, 8 large scale massacres, hundreds of other attacks, three
wars, the constant buzzing of drones, the deaths of friends and family, temporary
or permanent displacement and the list goes on and on.
To top this
all off, when the people of Gaza rose up in their hundreds of thousands
non-violently, beginning on the 30th March (2018), they were ignored by the
world which has done nothing to stop Israel for its murder of 330+ unarmed
demonstrators and the injuring of approximately 40,000. Until now, the
demonstrations are still ongoing on a weekly basis and no Israeli soldiers have
been killed or sustained any serious injuries.
Resistance is a right
According to
International Law, the people of Gaza have every right to use armed force in
order to struggle for self determination and to end the siege. Israel has no
claim to a “right of self defence”, just as a rapist would have no claim to a
right of self defence against their rape victim, and the next time we hear of
Israel’s “right” in anyway to use force, we must know that whoever repeats this
is contradicting the Fourth Geneva Convention.
File photo: A street scene looking down the street into a Bedouin community in Gaza.
Aviv Kochavi said
recently in a speech pertaining to a future war against Gaza, that Israel will
target electrical, agricultural and other structural components, which
according to Israel contribute to keeping Hamas – Gaza’s governing Party –
afloat. This means that if Israel does begin a new massacre (war) against Gaza
– or Hamas as they will claim – then it will mean that all the statistics
listed off above will accelerate to unprecedented numbers and that Gaza will
become even more uninhabitable.
The only questions now left to be answered are,
what will stop Israel from completely genociding the people of Gaza? and how
will the world’s future generations look at us today for allowing this
holocaust to occur against the people of Palestine. One million Palestinian
children are being systematically poisoned by Israel and there is nothing but
deafening silence.
Robert
Inlakesh is a journalist, writer and political analyst, who has lived in and
reported from the occupied Palestinian West Bank. He has written for
publications such as Mint Press, Mondoweiss, MEMO, and various other outlets.
He specializes in analysis of the Middle East, in particular Palestine-Israel.
He also works for Press TV as a European correspondent.
Palestinians filling bottles and jerricans with drinking water at the Al-Shati refugee camp in the southern Gaza Strip, March 22, 2017. Hosam Salem / NurPhoto
Gazans are forced to buy water at
six times the standard rate from private enterprises
Almost all of
the drinking water in the Gaza Strip is
impotable because of sewage pollution or high salinity levels, according to
data presented last week by a hydrologist who advises the Palestinian Water
Authority.
Campaign Against Anti-Semitism Libels Dina Mulholland, Labour PPC for
Ceredigion and Mike Sivier of Vox
Political
Campaign Against Anti-Semitism attacks Labour PPC Dinah Mulholland
Bogus charity, Campaign
Against Anti-Semitism, which campaigns making false and libellous
accusations of anti-Semitism, has now stepped up its campaign during the
General Election. The latest victims are
Dina
Mulholland, Labour PPC for Ceredigion and Mike
Sivier, who was suspended as Labour candidate in the elections for Powys
county council.
Campaign Against AntiSemitism Lies About Mike Sivier - naturally Labour nationally suspended him at once when this far-Right charity came a calling
In addition to the petition
calling on the Charity Commission to deregister this Zionist libel machine that
masquerades as a charity, [have you
signed yet?] I submitted a complaint to the Charity Commission nearly 3
months ago. Despite promises to the
contrary the Commission still have not dealt with it.
When it comes to complaints from the Right that Student
Unions are supporting Israel Apartheid Week the Charity Commission jumped into
action under their far-Right Chairman William Shawcross, a former board member
of the Henry Jackson Society and a virulent Islamaphobe. But when it's a bogus Zionist 'charity' the Charity Commission does nothing.
According to the fake 'charity' CAA this post on an Israeli Internet Magazine +972 is also anti-Semitic
I have today
submitted a further complaint about the CAA’s outrageous and illegal interference in the general
election campaign. By defaming Dina
Mulholland, the CAA have also committed a criminal
offence under s.106 of the Representation of the Peoples Act. I urge you to bombard the Charity Commission with complaints.
The CAA is strongly suspected of being funded by a $50m Israeli government slush fund to combat BDS and it is using this to destabilise the Labour Party.
What was the basis
of CAA's accusation that Dina Mulholland was anti-Semitic?
She alleged, in an article, that the Israeli military had sprayed
skunk, an evil smelling liquid that is regularly sprayed on peaceful
demonstrators, into water tanks making them undrinkable. Apparently this was a resurrection of the
ancient libel of Jewish well poisoning!
Demonstrators have testified that skunk is almost impossible to wash off. It clings to you for weeks. A BBC reporter testified that “Imagine the worst, most foul thing you have ever smelled. An overpowering mix of rotting meat, old socks that haven’t been washed for weeks – topped off with the pungent waft of an open sewer. . .Imagine being covered in the stuff as it is liberally sprayed from a water cannon. Then imagine not being able to get rid of the stench for at least three days, no matter how often you try to scrub yourself clean.”[8]
Imagine taking a chunk of rotting corpse from a stagnant sewer, placing it in a blender and spraying the filthy liquid in your face. Your gag reflex goes off the charts and you can't escape, because the nauseating stench persists for days.[4]
What the CAA are
saying is that allegations against Israeli soldiers or settlers are allegations
against all Jews and therefore automatically anti-Semitic. By this absurd logic, any criticism of Israel’s military occupation is automatically anti-Semitic.
Of course this is
nonsense. People don’t accuse Israel’s
army or Israeli settlers of war crimes because they are Jewish but
because they are war criminals and racists.
Their religion is irrelevant.
It is the Campaign Against Anti-Semitism
which is being anti-Semitic. They are equating
the actions of the Israeli Army and Settlers with all Jews. They are therefore breaking the very
‘International Definition of Anti-Semitism’ that they rely on. The IHRA definition gives as an example of ‘Contemporary examples of
antisemitism’
‘Holding Jews collectively responsible for actions
of the state of Israel’
The original
allegation of well poisoning related to the Black Death which peaked in Europe in the 14th
century. At that time, not knowing about
bacteria, germs etc. people sought an explanation for the death of possibly
half of Europe’s population in Jewish poisoning of wells.
Once the Zionist Campaign Against Antisemitism spread their libellous poison, the mass media followed up with more lies
It hasnothing whatever to do with the well
documented examples of Israeli military and settler poisoning of the Palestinian
wells on the West Bank.
No doubt Fred Pearce (see letter to CC below) was also anti-Semitic when
he wrote in the Guardian of 1st March 2006, Running
on empty that Israeli settlers poisoned Palestinian wells.
According to the Campaign Against AntiSemitism Laurence Brass's allegations of the poisoning of a Palestinian village well is a medieval blood libel and anti-Semitic - of course it's also true!
Perhaps Laurence Brass, who resigned as Treasurer of
the staunchly Zionist Board of Deputies of British Jews, in order to speak out against
the abominations perpetrated against the Palestinians is also
anti-Semitic? Mr Brass was quoted
in the Jewish Chronicle of 20th December 2012 as stating that on a
visit to the West Bank:
‘the abiding memory of his visit would be “the sight of an old rusty car being dumped
down the village well, thus preventing the locals from having fresh water.’
If accusing any Jew of ever having poisoned water supplies is anti-Semitic then Israeli historian and Ha'aretz journalist Tom Segev's passage above is grossly anti-Semitic
If allegations that Jews may poison water resources is
automatically anti-Semitic then what does one make of the documented fact that
a group of Holocaust survivors, led by Abba Kovner, plotted to poison the drinking
water of German cities as revenge for the Holocaust? It is so well documented that even the
malicious liars and perjurers of the Campaign Against Anti-Semitism would be
hard put to it to deny it. It is documented
by, amongst others, Israeli historian and Ha’aretz journalist Tom Segev in his
book The Seventh Million, in a Chapter
entitled ‘6 Million Germans’ (pp. 140-146).
Perhaps Segev is also anti-Semitic?
What this shows is that the Campaign Against Anti-Semitism
has no hesitation in making the most outrageous accusations of false
anti-Semitism against people.
It is a disgrace that the Labour Party Compliance Unit, in
its case against the Black-Jewish anti-racist activist Jackie Walker, quotes
the racist liar Gideon Falter, Chair of the CAA against Jackie. If Jeremy Corbyn has any integrity he will
put a stop to the practice of quoting racists against Black anti-racists and he
will fire Iain McNicoll and the head of the Compliance Unit John Stolliday for
having used the testimony of racists in their witch-hunt.
I have submitted a further complaint to the Charity
Commission against the Campaign Against Anti-Semitism.
Sign the Petition calling on the Charity Commission to deregister the racist ‘charity’ Camaign Against Anti-Semitism. We now have over 2,800 signatures. Please share widely and let's get at least 10,000 signatures.
Also please
submit your own complaint to the Charity Commission against this bogus ‘charity’.
Correspondence to the Charity Commission Concerning the Campaign Against
Anti-Semitism
Jane Grenfell,
Senior Technical Case
Manager, Regulatory Compliance
Charity Commission
8th May 2017
Dear Ms Grenfell,
Thank you for your response to my query as to why
the Charity Commission has delayed responding to my complaints of 11th
Februar and subsequently against the bogus ‘charity’ Campaign Against
Anti-Semitism Registration Number: 1163790.
You say that there has been a reorganisation within
the Commission. However when Student
Unions organised Israel Apartheid Weeks earlier this year, the Charity
Commission was able to respond to complaints from the Israeli Embassy and
Zionist groups within a very short period of time. When it is convenient, the Charity Commission
can move very quickly.
The complaints against the Campaign Against
Anti-Semitism are even more urgent given that we are now in the middle of a General
Election. The Campaign Against Anti-Semitism
is actively intervening to attack certain, mainly Labour, parliamentary
candidates. This must stop immediately
and you are under a legal duty to act without delay.
The CAA’s actions also breach Section 106 of the
Representation of the People Act 1983 which specifies that it is a criminal
offence to make or publish a false statement of fact about the personal
character or conduct of an election candidate.
For further information you might want to consult this briefing
on the defamation of candidates standing for election although it would be
remiss of you not to be aware of it.
It would also be incumbent on the Welsh Labour
Party to replace Ms Mulholland as a Labour candidate.In fact this allegation was a complete and total lie. A
wicked fabrication.the Labour Party
has now investigated this allegation and has found it to be wanting.
A failure to act on your part, given that you are the
regulatory body, will be
seen as making you complicit in the CAA’s unlawful actions. It will also be an act of gross
maladministration and a complaint will be made to the Parliamentary Ombudsman.
The allegation against Ms Mulholland concerns an article published on voicewales.com on 13th November 2016,
which recounted her visit to the West Bank as a delegate for Unite the
Union. According to the CAA Ms Mulholland alleged that:
‘the Israeli military has ‘weaponised’ water, spraying
chemicalised ‘skunk’ water into the water tanks of Palestinian protesters,
making it unsafe to use.”
On this flimsy and artificial basis the
CAA concluded that what Ms Mulholland had written was equivalent to ‘the false accusation of poisoning wells
(which) has been used to demonise Jews and inflame violence against Jews since
as early as the Middle Ages and is regarded as one of the gravest age-old
antisemitic canards.’
Ms Mullholland’s accusations did not
refer to the Jews, that was the CAA’s interpretation. They related to the Israeli military
occupation and Jewish settlers on the West Bank. They do not relate to Jews at all but to Israeli
who happen to be Jews. This attempt to equate far-Right settlers
with all Jews is itself anti-Semitic according to the very ‘International’
Definition of anti-Semitism that the CAA has recourse to.
If the CAA is correct that an allegation
of poisoning water against anyone who happens to be Jewish is a resurrection of
a medieval anti-Semitic libel, then the Israeli +972 Magazine is also guilty of
the same offence. In its edition of
November 15 2014 Haggai Matar wrote an article WATCH:
Police spray putrid water on Palestinian homes, schools.
Perhaps Fred Pearce, writing for the
Guardian of 1st March 2006, Running
on empty was also anti-Semitic when he wrote:
‘Oxfam's
Geoff Graves took me to Madama, a Palestinian village near Nablus, where
neighbouring Israeli settlers poisoned the village's only well and shot at aid
workers who came to clean it. Most villagers now buy water from passing
tankers, but not all can afford it. Ahmed Qot, a poor farmer, told me he spends
three hours every day carrying pots on his donkey to get water from a nearby
village for his nine children and five farm animals.
It is a fact that the rabidly racist Jewish
settlers on the West Bank have poisoned Palestinian wells. There are dozens of such examples. This does NOT mean that this is therefore typical Jewish behaviour. It is the typical behaviour of settler
colonists, whatever their religion. For the Campaign Against Anti-Semitism to
suggest that the behaviour of West Bank settlers represents normal Jewish
behaviour is itself an anti-Semitic calumny against Jews. The CAA is not only a
rabidly Zionist organisation it is clearly anti-Semitic.
An allegation against a specific group of Jews that
they have tried to or actually poisoned water supplies does not mean that it is
necessarily untrue, still less a blood libel.
At the end of the second world war, a group of Jewish survivors of the
Holocaust, led by Abba Kovner, planned to poison the water supply of German
cities by way of revenge for the Holocaust.
This is extremely well documented but Kovner was arrested in time. This is covered in the chapter ‘6 Million
Germans’ (pp, 140-146) in The Seventh Million (1993) by Israeli historian and Ha’aretz
journalist Tom Segev. I don’t believe
anyone has accused Tom Segev of anti-Semitism previously but no doubt he will
now be subject to the attentions of the CAA.
I would therefore appreciate your confirmation that
the investigation against the Campaign Against Anti-Semitism will be treated
with the utmost seriousness, without any delay and that they will be told to
avoid all further comment on General Election candidates.
Yours sincerely,
Tony Greenstein
Previous
Correspondence 8th May 2017 16:43 Dear Mr Greenstein I am sorry that it
did not prove possible to respond as Mr Young had indicated. Due to a
re-organisation within the Commission I have been asked to carry forward your
concerns and will be examining them in detail. It is not possible at this stage
to give any timeframe for the conduct of this case. However, once I have
completed my analysis I will let you know. I appreciate that
this will be frustrating for you, but I can confirm that I am looking in detail
at the information you have provided. Yours sincerely Jane Grenfell Senior
Technical Case Manager, Regulatory Compliance. W: https://www.gov.uk/charity-commission
------------------- Original Message
-------------------
From: TONY GREENSTEIN Received: To: PCT - Liverpool (Queue) Subject: Re: 20170322 - To Tony Greenstein – update - CAMPAIGN AGAINST
ANTI-SEMITISM 1163790 CRM:0162547
To: Alex Young
The Charity Commission
8th May 2017-05-08
Dear Mr Young,
You wrote to me on 22nd
March stating that you were still evaluating my complaint against the Campaign
Against Anti-Semitism and that you were advised it would take a week before a
decision was made.
It is now over 6 weeks since you
wrote to me and I have heard nothing.
I suspect that this matter has
gone up to your Chairman, the Islamaphobic William Shawcross, who is a hardline
Zionist as well as a member of the far-Right Henry Jackson Society and that
this is what has delayed your decision. In other words political
interference.
Please confirm whether my
suspicions are correct and if not when we are going to get a substantive
response.
In the meanwhile this bogus
‘charity’ is continuing to defame anyone who they consider supportive of the
Palestinians and opposed to Zionism, especially if they are for example Labour
candidates.
This alone should have got you doing something quickly and it
is a disgrace that you have sat on this for nearly 3 months.
I attach to this a
petition which at the time this was downloaded had over 2,700 signatures.
It is now over 2,800 signatures calling for the CAA to be deregistered as a
charity. I also attach the comments from signatories.
Thank you for your emails
of 12 and 13 February and 3 March, and 22 March.
PRIMARY COMPLAINT:
We are still evaluating
your complaints against the charity, and particularly your request that its
charitable status should be removed. We will examine the further items
you supplied on 20 March. I am advised there is the prospect of
decisions on these matters within a week from today, after which we will
communicate to you our view on the issues you have raised. If we consider
that there are issues we must take up with the charity (for clarification or by
way of regulatory advice) we will advise you that this is our conclusion.
IDENTITY OF THE TRUSTEES:
We are considering this information request in parallel to your primary
complaint, taking into account the Commission's various legal responsibilities
to inform our decision. Again I am advised there is the prospect
of a decision on this matter within a week from today, after which we will
communicate to you our view.
Dinah Mulholland,
the Labour Party’s parliamentary candidate for Ceredigion constituency in Wales
in the general election on 8th June, and for the Llangybi ward on Ceredigion
County Council in the Welsh local elections on 4th May, has invoked
a classic antisemitic libel about Jews poisoning wells. An article published on voicewales.com on 13th November
2016 recounts her recent visit to the West Bank as a delegate for
Unite the Union. The article states: “According to Dinah, the Israeli
military has ‘weaponised’ water, spraying chemicalised ‘skunk’ water into the
water tanks of Palestinian protesters, making it unsafe to use.” The false accusation of poisoning wells has been used to demonise
Jews and inflame violence against Jews since as early as the Middle Ages and is
regarded as one of the gravest age-old antisemitic canards. Mulholland’s
unsubstantiated allegation breaches the International
Definition of Antisemitism which states that “Using the symbols and images
associated with classic antisemitism (e.g. claims of Jews killing Jesus or
blood libel) to characterise Israel or Israelis” is antisemitic.
Two new videos catch a police ‘skunk’ truck
spraying East Jerusalem neighborhoods with foul-smelling liquid. The smell was
so bad that 4,500 students had to stay home from school. The “skunk” trucks drives slowly through the neighborhood.
It is evening, and there is no evidence of clashes in the area. The truck
proceeds slowly, sprays putrid-smelling water on a nearby building, continues
on and shoots once again. When it’s all over, the truck has tainted schools,
homes, streets – entire neighborhoods – with its unbearable stink. Just like
that. Two videos that were filmed this past week by Palestinian
residents of Jerusalem and were given to +972 support claims by residents
regarding the inappropriate use of the skunk by the police. In August, the
Association for Civil Rights in Israel (ACRI) filed a complaint to the police
regarding multiple cases of the arbitrary use of the skunk, especially at times
when there are no protests or clashes. It seems that the police has not changed
its ways. The common understanding among residents and human rights
organizations is that the police are collectively
punishing Jerusalem’s Palestinian residents, in light of clashes
between youth and police in these neighborhoods. But the punishment neither
begins nor ends with skunk water; the police block entrances to these neighborhoods
with concrete blocks, detains residents for long hours at checkpoints and hands
out petty fines – all at the behest of the Jerusalem municipality.
Police use the ‘skunk’ water canon to disperse protesters
in Kafr Kanna, a day after Israeli police fatally shot an Arab man in the
village. (photo: Yotam Ronen/Activestills.org) In the A-Tur neighborhood, the police shot skunk water at
four large schools, forcing the parents of 4,500 students to leave their
children at home due to the unbearable smell. “It was this past Friday, at
around 5:30 p.m.,” says Khader Abu Sabitan, a member of the parents’ committee
in the neighborhood. “I was on the road and saw them pass with their machine,
and saw how they began shooting water at the school. I’m telling you – there
was nothing there. It is Friday at 5:30 in the evening, and there was no one in
the school or on the streets. Nothing. Everyone was home. They went to all four
schools in the neighborhood, shot the water, and left.” The skunk water targeted the A-Tur elementary school for
boys, the elementary and high school for girls, a high school for boys and the
“Basma” elementary school for disabled children. All four schools are located
on the neighborhood’s main street. “After we saw what they did, we told the parents not to
send the children to school on Saturday, which is a school day for us. We
thought that the municipality would be able to solve the problem by Sunday,
since the children didn’t go to school on that day. It wasn’t a strike – we
just could not enter the area because of the smell. We sent letters through the
teachers on Saturday and Sunday, but no one came. So we brought back the
children to school on Monday, and told them to go straight to class ad not
linger outside. The smell even permeated the classrooms, but they closed the
windows and made do somehow. They stayed inside during the lunch break and then
went straight home. It has been a week, and it still smells. Less, but you can
still smell it.” For anyone who has not experienced it, words cannot express
the smell of the skunk. The Israeli-developed truck is primarily used by the
army in the occupied territories over the past several years, although now it
is slowly making its way to Jerusalem and Israel. The strong stench smells like
a mix of feces and animal carcass – gagging is almost inevitable. The worst part is that there is almost no way to get rid of
the smell. Showering doesn’t help, and protesters usually deal with it is by
taking a dip in the sea. Objects that have been sprayed with skunk water often
smell for much longer periods of time. After being hit with a few drops of
skunk water, my camera smelled for nearly half a year. It is difficult to fathom exactly why such large amounts of
skunk water must be sprayed at classrooms and homes, as can be seen in the
second video that was filmed in the Jabel Mukaber neighborhood of Jerusalem.
Like in the video from A-Tur, there are no stone throwers or protesters. The
police act casually, there are no rocks being thrown in the air, no sounds of
explosions, no screaming or bullets that characterize confrontations in East
Jerusalem. Just a skunk truck spraying homes. “The perception of the residents and organizations is that
the police uses the skunk routinely, regardless of whether they are dispersing
protests, as one can plainly see in the video” Oshrat Maimon, an attorney with
the Ir Amim NGO. “The problem is that we don’t even know what the police’s
procedure is when it comes to using the skunk. Therefore, we don’t know if the
problem is in the procedure itself, or in the lack of implementation. The truth
is that we’re a bit helpless in this situation.” Over the past several weeks, activists from East Jerusalem
have met with members of human rights organizations in order to attempt to formulate
a response to the actions of the police and municipality. They, however, found
it difficult to arrive at a solution. “Our field coordinators say that people
are afraid of the police and do not want to provide testimonies,” says Maimon.
“Even people who were shot, such as someone was hit with a sponge-tipped bullet
in the head or a woman who was shot and her uterus was torn – when our
investigators speak with them, they are afraid that if they speak up the police
will find its way to them and find a way to harm them. In response to ACRI’s request, the police responded that
the skunk is used according to regulations, but refused to say explain what the
regulation says. ACRI has attempted to force the police to publish the
regulations vis-a-vis the skunk. Meanwhile in East Jerusalem, the occupation
becomes smellier than ever. +972 asked for a response from Jerusalem Police. Their
response will be published here.
This article was first published on +972′s
Hebrew-language sister site, Local Call. Read it in Hebrew here.
