Showing posts with label Mark Thompson. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Mark Thompson. Show all posts

17 November 2012

The Vampire State On the Rampage in Gaza

As Western 'Democratic' Leaders Applaud - Palestinian Children and Civilians are Murdered

Once again the Israeli state has been revealed in all its naked glory - a throwback to the settler colonial states of Southern Africa and the European states in the 1930's.  Israel represents a combination of both imperialist aggression coupled with settler colonial barbarism.

It is no surprise that the BBC has run with Israel's propaganda stories, that their murderous attacks from the air were a 'response' to rockets fired upon them.  As many of the articles I will post show, this is a pretext and a lie.  But lies in the service of the State have never caused the BBC and its editors to lose any sleep.  When the BBC began to become slightly more impartial in the early years of this century, there began a Zionist campaign to reign it in, with blessing of the Blair and Brown governments.  Mark Thompson, the BBC's Director General and a Zionist who had turned a blind eye to the sexual predator Jimmy Saville, led the charge with his infamous decision to veto the Disasters Emergency Committee's appeal on the BBC.  This was unprecedented, except for a similar veto in the Lebanon.

Many other blogs will concentrate on the human tragedies involved.  This is understandable and I will not shy away from covering solidarity action and the toll of death and destruction that Israel is causing to the defenceless people of Gaza.  But it is important to understand why Israel is doing what it is doing, how it is enabled by the West to do it and why Western leaders are complicit in Israel's mayhem and murder.

I will therefore be carrying articles which I think are of particular use to the solidarity movement e.g. Ali Abunimah's excellent time-line on Israel's mendacity and duplicity in agreeing a ceasefire at the same time as planning to break the same ceasefire with the assassination of Hamas's military leader, Ahmad al-Jabari.

Also of interest is the article by Professor Moshe Machover, a long-standing Israeli anti-Zionist and socialist.

I issue just one word of caution.  We must build the strongest and biggest solidarity movement, but we should never be tempted into accepting the Zionist narrative that to oppose what Israel does is to be 'anti-semitic'.  Just as South Africa called itself a 'white' nation, so Israel sees itself as the representative of a 'Jewish' nation.  Most Jews are, of course, Zionists but most Zionists are not Jewish.  Their base lies in the Christian bible belt of the American South and in the boardrooms of American and European multi-nationals.  Our response must always be a political one, not a reflection of the racist and racial politics of Zionism.

I will also be parochial and focus in particular on the solidarity action in the city in which I live, Brighton & Hove.  Fifty miles south of London, it has had - as regular readers of the blog will know - an active campaign against an Israeli company based on the West Bank - Sodastream for the past few months.  Yesterday evening there was an impromptu demonstration to Sodastream (or Ecostream as it calls itself).  Tomorrow there will be another such demonstration.

Tony Greenstein

Israel launches offensive on people of Gaza

Moshé Machover, November 15, 2012

Moshé Machover condemns the latest assault and calls for global solidarity

Israel’s current “Pillar of Defence” assault on the Gaza Strip has some uncanny parallels with the “Cast Lead” massacre of December 2008/January 2009. Both attacks were carried out shortly before general elections.

In the February 2009 elections, Kadima, the senior party in the coalition that perpetrated Cast Lead, got the largest number of Knesset seats, but was unable to form a coalition – which led to the the present coalition, headed by Netanyahu and his Likud party. Now Netanyahu seems to be repeating the exercise, hoping that it may improve his electoral position in the forthcoming January 2013 elections.

In both cases the assault was preceded by a series of low-profile Israeli provocations, such as killing a Gaza teenager playing football in sight of Israeli snipers or sinking fishing boats off the Gaza coast. These carefully calibrated incidents are off the radar of the Israeli and Western media, but a sufficient number of them serve eventually to provoke retaliation in the form of unguided rockets fired more or lass at random from Gaza into Israel. These are widely reported and enable Israel to claim that its massive assault is a retaliation rather than the other way around. In both cases, Israel violated a cease-fire agreement brokered by Egypt. This time, the cease-fire agreed on Monday, 12 November, was broken by Israel’s assassination of the senior Hamas military chief, Ahmad al-Ja’abari. This was calculated to escalate the spiral of death and was followed by a massive Israeli bombardment, and is ongoing as I write.

But the Arab region has changed radically since 2009, and is now much more volatile and less predictable. This means that flaring up of the local fire may ignite a regional conflagration. This too may serve Netanyahu’s hidden agenda: a protracted regional war may provide a smokescreen for a major ethnic cleansing of Palestinians from the territories occupied by Israel since 1967. This is a long-term plan supported by all major Zionist parties. It is designed to resolve the contradiction between the deep-seated Zionist opposition to the creation of a Palestinian sovereign state, however small, in any part of pre-1948 Palestine, and the even greater “demographic peril”, as it is openly described in Israeli public society, of Arab majority in that land. It would lead to a “One-State Solution” Zionist style: the whole of Palestine turned into Greater Israel, with a predominant Jewish majority.

Progressive world public opinion must be urgently mobilised to halt the current bloodshed and prevent an even greater catastrophe.

A list of global emergency protests can be found here.

Moshé Machover is an Israeli socialist, founding member of Matzpen. His collection of essays, Israelis and Palestinians: Conflict and Resolution, has recently been published by Haymarket Books.

PCHR - Palestinian Centre for Human Rights

PRESS RELEASE

IOF Continue the Offensive on the Gaza Strip:
Civilian Deaths Rise to 10, Including 6 Children, and 253 Others, Including 62 Children, Wounded

Israeli Occupation Forces (IOF) have continued the offensive on the Gaza Strip. Over the past 24 hours, IOF have intensified aerial, marine and ground attacks on the Gaza Strip. The number of Palestinians who have been killed has mounted to 19, including 10 civilians. The civilian victims include 6 children and a woman. Additionally, 257 Palestinians, including 253 civilians, have been wounded - this number includes 62 children and 42 women. The latest development since the press release issued by PCHR yesterday noon have been as follows:

The Northern Gaza Strip:

IOF have launched 130 airstrikes targeting agricultural areas in the vicinity of houses, and paramilitary training sites. As a result of these attacks, 3 Palestinian civilians, including two children, have been killed, and 66 others, including 63 civilians, were wounded - this number includes 16 children and 6 women. Additionally, a number of houses and a mosque have been damaged.

At approximately 22:30 on Thursday, 15 November 2012, Odai Jamal Nasser, 15, and Fares Ahmed al-Basyouni, 8, were killed while they were inside their houses, which are located a few meter away from an agricultural plot belonging to the Shabat family which was hit by an Israeli missile in al-Wad area in Beit Hanoun town. Additionally, 22 Palestinian civilians, including 14 children and 3 women, were wounded.

Earlier, at noon, Marwan Abdul Rahman Mohammed Abu al-Qumsan, 52, an UNRWA teacher, was killed when IOF bombarded a space area near Nour al-Huda Mosque in al-Israa neighborhood in the southeast of Beit Lahia town. He had been visiting the house of his brother, Radwan, 76, who was also seriously wounded.

Gaza City:

Israeli warplanes launched dozens of air strikes on Gaza City, targeting governmental buildings, civilian property and other objects. The most significant targets was the building of the Civil Department of the Ministry of Interior in Tal al-Hawa neighborhood in the south of the City. The building was totally destroyed and a number of nearby buildings and houses were heavily damaged. Israeli fighter jets bombarded also the building of the Collection and Inspection Center of Gaza Municipality near Abu Mazen Square. The building was completely destroyed and a number of nearby houses and buildings were heavily damaged. Israeli fighter jets further bombarded a plot belonging to an ecclesiastic center near the Roots Restaurant in the southwest of Gaza City.

Additionally, Israeli gunboats bombarded an electricity transmitter near the house of Prime Minister Ismail Haniya in the Beach camp. A number of houses and a civilian car were heavily damaged.

On Thursday evening, 15 November 2012, 10-month-old Haneen Khaled Ahmed Tafesh died of wounded she had sustained in the head when an Israeli warplane bombarded her family's house in al-Zaytoun neighborhood. Her mother and another two persons were wounded in the same attack.

On Friday morning, 16 November 2012, Kamal Mohammed Murad Maqat, 23, died from a heart attack, when IOF bombarded a plot located near his house in Sheikh Radwan neighborhood.

As a result of Israeli airstrikes, 60 Palestinian civilians, including 10 women and 13 children, have been wounded.

The Central Gaza Strip:

IOF have launched 21 airstrikes targeting agricultural plots, space areas and paramilitary training sites. As a result of these attacks, 4 Palestinian civilians, including two children and a woman, were injured, and a number of houses and a school have been extensively damaged.

Khan Yunis:

IOF have launched 18 airstrikes on Khan Yunis. The targets included a house belonging to Mohammed al-Sinwar, a leader of the Izziddin al-Qassam Brigades (the armed wing of Hamas) in al-Satar al-Gharbi area in the north of Khan Yunis, which was completely destroyed. Additionally, 5 nearby houses and the buildings of the Youth Dawn Association and al-Jaleel Association were heavily damaged, while a Palestinian civilian was injured when a wall collapsed over him while he was sleeping. As a result of other attacks, an UNRWA clinic in the west of the town was heavily damaged, and 4 civilians, including two children, were wounded.

On Thursday evening, two-year-old Waleed Mahmoud al-Abadla died of wound he had sustained throughout the body, when IOF bombarded a farmland near his family's house, where he was playing, in al-Qarara village, northeast of Khan Yunis, in the morning.

Rafah:

IOF have launched 18 airstrikes on various areas in Rafah, targeting agricultural plots, space areas and paramilitary training sites. The Israeli artillery also shelled the town sporadically.

Seven Palestinian civilians, including 5 members of the Fouju family (a man, his wife and their three children), were wounded while they were inside their houses when an Israeli missile hit Zourob Square in the west of the town on Thursday evening, 15 November 2012.

Dozens of houses and public facilities have been extensively damaged.

PCHR reiterates condemnation and expresses utmost concern for these crimes, and:

1- Warns of deterioration of the humanitarian situation in the Gaza Strip in light of this new Israeli military escalation and the tightened closure.
2- Calls upon the international community to act immediately to stop these crimes, and renews the call to the High Contracting Parties of the Fourth Geneva Convention to fulfill their obligation under Article 1 of the Convention to ensure that it is respected at all times, and their responsibilities under Article 146 to pursue perpetrators of serious violations of the Convention, which are determined in Article 147, which lists violations of the Convention amounting to war crimes.

Public Document
**************************************
For more information please call PCHR office in Gaza, Gaza Strip, on +972 8 2824776 - 2825893
PCHR, 29 Omer El Mukhtar St., El Remal, PO Box 1328 Gaza, Gaza Strip. E-mail: pchr@pchrgaza.org, Webpage http://www.pchrgaza.org
-----------------------------------
If you got this forwarded and you want to subscribe, send mail to request@pchrgaza.org
and write "subscribe" in the subject line.

Stop a New Israeli Massacre in Gaza: Boycott Israel Now!

Occupied Palestine, 15 November 2012

On November 8, Israel carried out an attack on civilians in the occupied and besieged Gaza Strip, shooting 13-year-old Ahmad Abu Daqqa while he played football with friends. By November 14, Israel had intensified its attacks on Gaza and begun to implement an intensive plan of aggression that at the time of writing has killed at least 15 Palestinians, including at least 6 children, and injured over 150, predominantly civilians.

Despite biased Western media reports to the contrary, it is clear that Israel has initiated and escalated this new assault [1] on the eve of its upcoming parliamentary elections, underlining the time-honoured Israeli formula of Palestinian bodies for ballots.[2]

It is worth noting that a great majority of the Gaza population are refugees ethnically cleansed by Zionist militias and later the state of Israel during the 1948 Nakba and denied by Israel their UN-sanctioned right to return to their homes of origin.

This belligerent aggression is the most murderous and inhuman Israeli attack on the Palestinian people since the Gaza massacre of 2008-09, which killed more than 1,400 and injured more than 5,000 Palestinians, mainly civilians. The US and Europe have so far been successful in preventing Palestinian recourse to international justice mechanisms for Israeli crimes against humanity that took place during the massacre and that were documented by a UN Fact Finding Mission as well as a team of international law experts commissioned by the Arab League. Urgent action must be taken to prevent Israel from acting with such impunity again.

The 1.6 million Palestinians in Gaza have endured the worst of Israeli impunity and violence including being placed under a medieval siege, being subjected to deliberately created food insecurity and frequent acts of Israeli  state terrorism. It is the duty of all supporters of international law and universal human rights to hold Israel accountable through effective measures, such as those called for in the global, Palestinian-led Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) movement.

The Palestinian BDS National Committee (BNC), the broadest coalition in Palestinian civil society, including all major political parties,  trade unions, social movements and NGO networks, calls on:
- People of conscience around the world to intensify BDS campaigns to hold Israel accountable, and to pressure their governments to immediately suspend arms trade with Israel, implement trade sanctions, and bring to justice all Israeli officials and military personnel who took part, at all levels, in Israel’s crimes against Palestinians in Gaza.

- Civil society organisations, including trade unions, universities, trade unions, student groups and NGOs, to boycott Israeli goods, divest from all Israeli and international companies that are complicit with Israel’s occupation and apartheid, and call for governments to implement military embargoes and trade sanctions on Israel.

- Governments, especially Arab and friendly governments, to respect their legal obligation to protect the Palestinian right to life and self-determination and to impose sanctions on Israel to immediately end its assault on, and cease its illegal siege of the occupied Gaza Strip and its policies of colonialism and apartheid that oppress the Palestinian people.

As this new attack on the people of Gaza shows, Israel will continue its belligerence, aggression and state terrorism unless it is made to pay a heavy price for its crimes against the Palestinian, Lebanese and other Arab peoples. As the last seven years of the global BDS movement and the long history of past international solidarity with the struggle against apartheid in South Africa have shown, the most effective, sustainable and morally consistent form of solidarity with the oppressed is for international civil society and conscientious people around the world to apply boycotts, divestment and sanctions against the oppressor and all institutions that collude in maintaining and justifying its oppression. It is high time for BDS against Israel.  This is the clearest path to freedom, justice and equality for Palestinians and the entire region.

BDS National Committee (BNC)

[1] For a timeline that explains how Israel has initiated this new attack, see 
[2] http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2012/11/15/bodies-for-ballots.html

Below was the impromptu demonstration of around  200 people on Thursday night which marched from the Old Steine to Sodastream's shop in the Western Road.  I made an off the cuff speech calling for a large picket/demonstration outside Sodastream on Saturday



Editorial
The Guardian, Thursday 15 November 2012 22.09 GMT

Attack on Gaza: Egypt's biggest challenge yet

The Guardian, Thursday 15 November 2012 22.09 GMT 

The Arab spring skirted around the central fire in the Middle East: Arab-Israeli conflict. Israel's actions have wheeled it straight back onto centre stage

Israel's decision to assassinate the Hamas chief of staff Ahmed al-Jabari and launch a full-scale air and sea bombardment against the militants in Gaza can be attributed to a number of factors – of which the need to stop missiles raining down on the south of the country is the least convincing. A ceasefire between Israel and Hamas was apparently being negotiated, through Egyptian intelligence, when the decision to kill Jabari was taken. Jabari, a man who undoubtedly dedicated his life to war against Israel, was also the man who enforced the truce for the last five and a half years over armed groups in the strip.

One man involved in the mediation to release Gilad Shalit claimed that hours before he was assassinated Jabari received the draft of a permanent truce agreement. War is never so near when peace is on offer. Recep Tayyip Erdogan, the Turkish prime minister, learned this lesson while trying to mediate peace talks between Syria and Ehud Olmert, just before Operation Cast Lead was launched at the end of 2008. Whatever was going on immediately before the strike on Jabari, a ceasefire has been negotiated after each outbreak of hostilities with Gaza militants. What was different this time?

The proximity of the Likud primaries and the general elections in Israel undoubtedly played a role. The attacks on Lebanon in 1996 and Gaza in 2008/9 both happened on the eve of elections, although military action turned into electoral defeat. But at the time the opportunity to turn a drama into a crisis was too good to miss. Prime minister Binyamin Netanyahu had been deprived both of a strike on Iran and a Republican president in the White House. An attack on Gaza re-established his national security credentials while wiping all possible rivals off the television screens, particularly the possible comeback of former premier Olmert, whose boast, too, was that he "took care" of Gaza. Ehud Barak, the defence minister, is fighting for votes just to get back into the Knesset.

The third calculation is the riskiest of the lot. It is not to test Hamas or to re-establish deterrence over other militant groups in Gaza. It is to test Egypt. The biggest difference between the current attack on Gaza and all the other ones is that today the regional furniture has changed. One of the two countries with which Israel had signed a peace treaty has gone through a revolution, bringing Islamists to power, and the other, Jordan, is being rattled by the same forces to its very bones. Kuwait, Bahrain, the Emirates, and parts of Saudi Arabia are all gripped by the same fever. The working assumption was that the further and deeper the Arab spring spread, the more Israel would have to temper the urge to hammer militants in Gaza with the need to keep its peace treaty intact with Egypt. With the call-up of reservists and missiles striking close to Tel Aviv, that theory is now being tested to destruction.
It has already led to one diplomatic consequence. For the first time since the siege of Gaza started, an Egyptian prime minister, Hisham Qandil, will on Friday visit Gaza. The Muslim Brotherhood president of Egypt, Mohamed Morsi, is right to be furious. He had done everything, from his point of view, to avoid a confrontation with Israel this early in his presidency. He launched a military operation against militants using Sinai to attack Israel. He began to seal up the tunnels under the Rafah border with Gaza, and limited the opening hours of the border crossing itself. This was the triumph of pragmatism over belief, because it made for very bad politics back home. Behind Morsi stands a tidal wave of anti-Israeli resentment from the Arab street, both Islamist and secular, of which Israeli diplomats had a small taste when they had to be rescued from a mob in Cairo. Try as Morsi might to avoid having to open the Pandora's box of the treaty with Israel, that now is the direction in which he is being pushed.

The Arab spring skirted around the central fire in the Middle East: Arab-Israeli conflict. Israel's actions have wheeled it straight back onto centre stage.

1 November 2012

Colin Shindler and the Self-Abasement of the Zionist ‘Left’

Meir Yaari - one of the leaders of Mapam - well versed in the dialectics of colonialism

Shindler's Bleat in the Socialist New York Times
Colin Shindler
How ‘Socialist Zionism’ Ended Up Supporting the Zionist Right & Lieberman
Colin Shindler who, for some reason, is a professor at the School of Oriental & African Studies, is virtually the sole remaining survivor of Mapam in the UK.  Mapam are or rather were, ‘Marxist’ Zionists who believed you could reconcile internationalism and workers solidarity with Zionism.  To them socialism and imperialism were bedfellows.  It has to be said that Colin is not a particularly bright fellow and he refers talking in shallow Zionist soundbites as a substitute for any deeper analysis of the issues.  But one has to take people as one finds them and it has to be admitted that it would take a genius to reconcile Zionism and socialism today.

In 1949 Mapam was the second largest party in Israel’s Knesset, with 19 out of 120 seats. See Israel's Elections - The Death of 2 States and the Zionist LeftToday Mapam has disappeared into Meretz, the Civil Rights Party, which had a total of 3 seats in the 2009 Israeli elections.  You might have thought Colin, being a professor, might have done some hard and innovative thinking about why it is that Yisrael Beteinu, party of the fascist Foreign Minister, Avigdor Lieberman (who has now joined Netanyahu’s Likud) got 5 times as many seats as the rump party of Meretz at the last general election and which gained more even than the Israeli Labour Party (13), which until 1977 had formed every single Israeli government.
Mapam on May Day Parade - socialism once a year
Not a bit of it.  Instead the trite and shallow Shindler wrote an Opinion Piece for the New York Times The European Left and Its Trouble With Jews.  The NYT has just appointed ex-BBC head Mark Thompson, who is not only a Zionist rogue who prevented the Disaster Emergency Committee from making an appeal for the children and victims of Israel’s bombing of Gaza in 2009, but is in it up to his neck in the Jimmy Savile cover-up.  Indeed NYT journalists are starting to call for Thompson’s head before he even takes up his post in order that the NYT avoids being tarnished by the cover up of  child abuse in which Thompson is believed to have engaged.  However I digress.

In his Opinion piece Shindler falsely claimed that the European left is reluctant to take a stance where anti-Zionism ‘spills over’ into anti-Semitism.  He gave no examples nor could he.  Instead he mentioned a few examples in France of where Islamists had targeted Jewish synagogues and schools.  All reprehensible and all brought about by those such as Shindler who claim that Israel’s barbarous treatment of the Palestinians is carried out on behalf of all Jews, wherever they live.  Unfortunately there are Muslim fools as well as Jewish racists who get taken in by this nonsense.  However what it has to do with the Left beats me.

It would of course have been more honest if Shindler had declared his own cards and explained that he used to be a UK representative of Mapam, a ‘Marxist-Zionist’ party that found the contradictions between socialism and Zionism  too difficult to reconcile and decided to choose nationalism and Zionism rather than socialism.
child pioneers - the image of a country without its indigenous populace
Shindler could have explained how the ‘shooting and crying’ philosophy of Mapam didn’t prevent Mapam from forming the core of the Palmach shock-troops in the 1947-8 Nakba and how they were prime amongst those who massacred and expelled.  How Mapam’s Kibbutz Ha'artzi Federation was also Jewish only and how Mapam’s Kibbutzim were the most eager to confiscate Arab land.  The most notable case being Kibbutz Baram, which was established when the villagers of the Arab village of Birim were persuaded to vacate their lands during the fighting and promised they would be allowed back after the fighting ended.  In the meantime Mapam’s ‘socialists’ took the land over and refused to relinquish it.  Even Menachem Begin, the Likud leader, supported the Arab villagers!
Mapam May Day Rally
Or Shindler could have explained why, when Israel attacked Egypt during the Suez War and Ben-Gurion was forced to withdraw his troops, Mapam stated a demonstration against withdrawal.  Hardly the actions of socialist internationalists!

I know no one on the Left who has any problem at all in denouncing bomb attacks against European Jews.  The real problem is that most far-right and neo-Nazi groups in Europe support Israel and Zionism!  In the UK, the fascist English Defence League march with Israeli flags as they attack ‘Muslims’.  A phenomenon that Shindler 'forgot' to mention.  Just as he forgot to mention the meetings between Ron Prossor, Israel’s UN Ambassador and Marine Le Pen, who is equally hostile to Muslims.

Shindler is equally wrong to suggest that European leftists identify with Political Islam.  We all know it is a reactionary political current.  But we also recognise that it was western imperialism – be it in Saudia Arabia, Afghanistan or indeed the Gaza Strip in the 1980’s, where the USA and Israel itself which backed Islamists against their secular opponents.  Indeed it was the Israeli government under Netanyahu in the 1980’s which helped create the very Hamas they decry today.

The suggestion Shindler makes, that there is any divorce between the Left’s hatred of Nazi Germany and its anti-colonial tradition is absurd.  Socialists have always opposed Apartheid in South Africa and the colonisation of Africa and the Middle East.  The Left was unanimously opposed to the Suez War and likewise Jean Paul Sartre, who Shindler quotes, was vehemently opposed, unlike Israeli ‘socialist’ Zionists, to the French colonisation of Algeria.  Of course there was a generation of the European Left who were so traumatised by the Nazi genocide of the Jews that they supported a Jewish state in Palestine not realising that one wrong could not undo another.  But they have long since recognised the error of their ways - people like Tony Benn and even Gerald Kaufmann.

But perhaps Shindler has forgotten what Marx wrote in respect of Ireland and the British working class.  ‘A nation that oppresses another nation shall not itself be free.’

What Shindler cannot and will not understand is that a ‘Jewish’ state in the context of support by western imperialism, cannot be other than one in which being Jewish means being privileged.  That is demonstrated in the Ha'aretz opinion poll of 23rd October in which 59 percent, supported preference for Jews over Arabs in admission to government jobs, 49 percent wanted the state to treat Jewish citizens better than Arab ones and 42 percent didn’t want to live in the same building with Arabs and 42 percent don't want their children in the same class with Arab children.

This is the ugly reality that Professor Colin Shindler, in his berating of the European left chooses to ignore.  Unfortunately the idea of Jewish jobs and Jewish land were not inventions of the right-wing Zionists but his socialist Zionist compatriots.  It was not Likud who campaigned in the 1920s and 1930s for Jewish Labour, Land and Produce but the Labour Zionists, Hashomer Hatzair (Mapam’s forerunners) included.

The real story that Shindler doesn’t tell is that ‘socialist’ Zionism only came about as an attempt to reconcile the irreconcileable.  Zionism began by rejecting the fight against anti-Semitism.  However the Jewish masses of the Russian Pale of Settlement first and foremost had to defend themselves against the pogromists.   It was impossible, if Zionism was to achieve any base, for them to abstain entirely from the fight against the anti-Semites.  Socialist Zionism was always a hybrid creature.  In Russia,  Poalei Zion collapsed into the Bolsheviks and in Warsaw in the fight against the Nazis, Left Poalei Zion (there was also a Right PZ), which the historian Emanuel Ringelblum of Oneg Shabbat was a member of, joined forces with the anti-Zionist Bund and was virtually an anti-Zionist group itself by the end.

Socialist Zionism was always a miserable creature and it is better that Zionism has come out in its true colours.  However there are still one or two left-overs from the 'socialist' Zionists, like Colin Shindler, who have learnt nothing from their abject defeat.

Tony Greenstein
 
Opinion

The European Left and Its Trouble With Jews

 LAST week, Twitter shut down a popular account for posting anti-Semitic messages in France. This came soon after the firing of blanks at a synagogue near Paris, the discovery of a network of radical Islamists who had thrown a hand grenade into a kosher restaurant, and the killing of a teacher and young pupils at a Jewish school in Toulouse earlier this year. The attacks were part of an escalating campaign of violence against Jews in France.

Today, a sizable section of the European left has been reluctant to take a clear stand when anti-Zionism spills over into anti-Semitism. Beginning in the 1990s, many on the European left began to view the growing Muslim minorities in their countries as a new proletariat and the Palestinian cause as a recruiting mechanism. The issue of Palestine was particularly seductive for the children of immigrants, marooned between identities.

Capitalism was depicted as undermining a perfect Islamic society while cultural imperialism corrupted Islam. The tactic has a distinguished revolutionary pedigree. Indeed, the cry, “Long live Soviet power, long live the Shariah,” was heard in Central Asia during the 1920s after Lenin tried to cultivate Muslim nationalists in the Soviet East once his attempt to spread revolution to Europe had failed. But the question remains: why do today’s European socialists identify with Islamists whose worldview is light-years removed from their own?

In recent years, there has been an increased blurring of the distinction between Jew, Zionist and Israeli. Hassan Nasrallah, the leader of the militant group Hezbollah, famously commented: “If we searched the entire world for a person more cowardly, despicable, weak and feeble in psyche, mind, ideology and religion, we would not find anyone like the Jew. Notice I do not say the Israeli.”
Whereas historically Islam has often been benevolent toward Jews, compared to Christianity, many contemporary Islamists have evoked the idea of “the eternal Jew.” For example, the Battle of Khaybar in 629, fought by the Prophet Muhammad against the Jewish tribes, is recalled in victory chants at Hezbollah rallies: “Khaybar, Khaybar, O Jews, the army of Muhammad will return,” and the name Khaybar sometimes graces Hezbollah rockets aimed at Israel.

Many contemporary Islamists see little difference between the Jewish opponents of the prophet in seventh-century Arabia and Jews today. Importing old symbols of European anti-Semitism — depictions of Jews as enemies of God or proclamations of a worldwide Jewish conspiracy — has helped cement such imagery. If there is a distinction between Islamic anti-Judaism and modern anti-Semitism, it has been lost on French Islamists.

The fear of Jewish domination of the Middle East has become a repetitive theme in the Islamist media — which has become more influential as religious parties have gained ground in the wake of the Arab Spring. This is a factor in the general refusal of the militant groups Hezbollah and Hamas to publicly meet members of the Israeli peace camp — a far cry from when Palestinian nationalists willingly negotiated with dovish Israelis before the 1993 handshake between Yitzhak Rabin and Yasir Arafat on the White House lawn.

The old left in Europe was forged in the struggle against local fascists in the 1930s. Most of Europe experienced a brutal Nazi occupation and bore witness to the atrocities of the Holocaust. The European left strongly identified with Jewish suffering and therefore welcomed the birth of the state of Israel in 1948. Some viewed the struggle for Israel in the same light as the fight for freedom in the Spanish Civil War.

But the succeeding generation of the European left did not see things this way. Its frame of reference was the anticolonial struggle — in Vietnam, South Africa, Rhodesia and a host of other places. Its hallowed icon was not the soldier of the International Brigades who fought against Franco in Spain, but Che Guevara — whose image adorned countless student bedrooms. Anticolonialism further influenced myriad causes, from America’s Black Panthers in the 1960s to Hugo Chávez’s Bolivarian revolution in Venezuela today.

It began with Israel’s exclusion from the ranks of the nonaligned nations more than 50 years ago, when Arab states refused to attend a 1955 nonaligned conference in Indonesia if an Israeli delegate was present. The Jewish state was snubbed in favor of such feudal kingdoms as Saudi Arabia, Libya and Yemen. And Israel’s collusion with imperial powers like Britain and France during the Suez crisis the following year cemented its ostracism.

Given the deep remorse for the misdeeds of colonialism, it was easier for the New Left of the 1960s to identify with the emerging Palestinian national movement than with the already established social democratic Israel. This deepening hostility toward Israel was present in Europe before the 1967 Arab-Israeli war and before the rush to build settlements on the West Bank.

AMID this rising hostility toward Israel, the French philosopher and political activist Jean-Paul Sartre advocated a different way forward. He was scarred by the memory of what had happened to France’s Jews during World War II — the discrimination, betrayals, deportations and exterminations. He understood the legitimacy of Israel’s war for independence and later commented that the establishment of the state of Israel was one of the few events “that allows us to preserve hope.” Yet Sartre also strongly supported Algeria’s fight for independence from France.

This double legacy of supporting Israel and the Algerian struggle symbolized the predicament of the entire postwar European left. Sartre argued that the left shouldn’t choose between two moral causes and that it was up to the Jews and the Arabs to resolve their conflict through discussion and negotiation. Sartre tried to create a space for a dialogue, lending his name and prestige to private and public meetings between the two sides such as the Comité Israël-Palestine in the 1970s. His approach reached its apogee with the many quiet meetings between Israelis and Palestinians in Europe that eventually led to the Oslo accords. But Sartre’s vision was stymied as Israeli settlements proliferated after 1977, strengthening the left’s caricature of Israel as an imperialist power and a settler-colonial enterprise. Some prominent voices on the European left have mouthed time-honored anti-Semitic tropes in their desire to appear supportive of the Palestinian cause. Ken Livingstone, a former newspaper editor and mayor of London, has a long history of insensitive remarks about Jews — from publishing a cartoon in 1982 of Menachem Begin, then Israel’s prime minister, in Gestapo uniform atop a pile of Palestinian skulls to likening a known Jewish reporter to “a concentration camp guard” 20 years later. Today, he contributes to Press TV, the English-language outlet for the Iranian government.

Sometimes the left distinguishes between vulnerable European Jews who have been persecuted and latter-day “Prussians” in Israel. Yet it is often forgotten that a majority of Israelis just happen to be Jews, who fear therefore that what begins with the delegitimization of the state will end with the delegitimization of the people.

Such Israelophobia, enunciated by sections of the European left, dovetailed neatly with the rise of Islamism among Palestinians and throughout the Arab world. The Islamist obfuscation of “the Jew” mirrored the blindness of many a European Marxist. Despite the well-intentioned efforts of many Jews and Muslims to put aside their differing perspectives on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, the offensive imagery of “the Jew” has persisted in many immigrant communities in Western Europe. Islamists were willing to share platforms with socialists and atheists, but not with Zionists.
The New Left’s profound opposition to American power, and the convergence of reactionary Islamists and unquestioning leftists was reflected in the million-strong London protest against the invasion of Iraq in 2003. It was organized by the Muslim Association of Britain, the Trotskyist Socialist Workers Party and the Stalinist Communist Party of Britain. When some Muslims voiced apprehension about participating in the protest with non-Muslims, the M.A.B. leadership decreed that it was religiously permissible if halal food was provided and men and women were given separate areas. Such displays of “reactionary clericalism,” as the early Bolsheviks would have called it, were happily glossed over.

Sartre understood that the conflict was not simply between Israelis and Palestinians, but between those advocating peace on both sides and their rejectionists. This conflict within the conflict is something that many on Europe’s left, as they ally themselves with unsavory forces, still fail to comprehend.

Instead, the swallowing up of both the Israeli and Palestinian peace camps by political polarization has accelerated the closing of the progressive mind. And static fatalism has allowed the assailant of synagogue congregants and the killer of young children to fill the vacuum.

Colin Shindler is an emeritus professor at the University of London’s School of Oriental and African Studies and the author of “Israel and the European Left: Between Solidarity and Delegitimization.”This article has been revised to reflect the following correction:
Correction: October 28, 2012
An earlier version of this article misstated the city in France where a teacher and pupils at a Jewish school were killed earlier this year. It was Toulouse, not Strasbourg. 
In addition, the biographical note misstated the name of the institution where the writer, Colin Shindler, is a professor. It is the School of Oriental and African Studies —   not the School of African and Oriental Studies — at the University of London.