Showing posts with label Holocaust Educational Trust. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Holocaust Educational Trust. Show all posts

29 September 2016

Defend Jackie Walker, Vice Chair of Momentum from the Racists of the ‘Jewish’ Labour Movement

Jackie Walker is pilloried for saying that the Holocaust is the property of all humanity

Jackie Walker speaking at an LRC meeting in Brighton.  Also on the platform was John McDonnell
Another JLM supporter is quite certain that Jackie is not Jewish - why?   because she is Black

Just one of many abusive and racist tweets Jackie has received, courtesy of the JLM's campaign - notice how she is a 'pro-Islamist' - like the fascists Zionists are the most extreme Islamaphobes
At Labour Party Conference just gone, in open defiance of the Chakrabarti Report, the Jewish Labour Movement held a 'training session' on Racism and anti-Semitism.  The supporters and advocates of a Jewish state, which is a state where Jews have privileges over non-Jews, were given the role of educating delegates on the meaning of anti-Semitism.  It is as if the General Medical Council had decided to hold a training course on medical ethics and appointed the late Harold Shipman as course director.  It is and was utterly absurd.

At the LP conference the JLM had deliberately invited as 'fraternal delegates' a delegation from the Israeli Labour Party.  You can gain some measure of the racism of the ILP from an article Herzog slammed for remark about ‘Arab lovers’ in the right-wing Jerusalem Post:

'Zionist Union head Isaac Herzog has been trying to move his party to the center, but he appeared to have gone too far late Tuesday, when he told an audience in Ashkelon that his faction’s MKs needed to correct an impression that they are always “Arab lovers.”

“A false impression exists that we take the needs of Palestinians into account before the needs of the State of Israel,” he said at a toast for Labor activists ahead of the Passover holiday.'


What kind of Party is it whose leader talks about the need to avoid being seen as 'Arab lovers'?  Imagine that Jeremy Corbyn said that the Labour Party needed to avoid being seen as 'Jew lovers'? I can remember when fighting the National Front and BNP being accused of being 'nigger lovers'.  Herzog, who not so long ago was trying to give Corbyn lessons on 'anti-Semitism' is the racist leader of a deeply racist party, yet the JLM invited a delegation from the ILP to Party conference.

At the 'training seminar' of the JLM, which was really a propaganda session, participants like Jackie Walker were covertly filmed in order that anyone questioning the racist agenda could then be reported to Iain McNicol and Tom Watson and then subject to disciplinary procedures.  The entrapment of people who attended is a disgrace and the JLM should have no further part in any form of anti-racist training.  Indeed the whole concept of 'training' for anti-racism is itself a reactionary concept.  Racism is eliminated by joint work and shared experiences not by lectures from on high.

Last week I wrote two  blog posts - an Open Letter to John McDonnell – Don’t Condone the Race Baiters of the Jewish Labour Movement and The Jewish Labour Movement and its Political Lynching of Jackie Walker describing how Jackie Walker, Momentum’s Vice Chair, has come under sustained attack by the supporters of the Israeli state.  What Zionists cannot bear most of all is that Jackie Walker is both Black and Jewish.  Numerous abusive tweets (we only hear about abusive tweets directed at MPs) by people who could not possibly know her have confidently declared that she is not Jewish.  Why?  Because it is an article of faith amongst most Zionists that Black people are not Jewish.
William Fishman, a Jewish historian, tells how the Zionists played no part in Jewish socialism and trade union struggles in the East End - Zionism was a petit bourgeois delusion
In the early 20th century when there was a Jewish labour movement, Zionists were excluded as scabs

These racists are being led by Jeremy Newmark and Mike Katz of the inappropriately named Jewish Labour Movement (until 2004 it was known as Poalei Zion).  I say inappropriate because when there was a Jewish labour movement in this country, it wanted nothing to do with the Zionist movement, which was rightly seen as a scab movement.  The Zionists were, as the enclosed scan from William Fishman’s highly acclaimed East End Radicals shows, held in contempt by a very real Jewish labour movement which, at its peak, consisted of over 30 Jewish unions.  A labour movement which helped destroy Sir Oswald Moseley’s British Union of Fascists at the Battle of Cable Street, a struggle which the Zionists desperately opposed at the time along with their bourgeois cousins in the Board of Deputies of British Jews.

crocodile tears come easy to these Blairite Zionists
The Zionists and the race baiters of the Jewish Labour Movement have never got over the fact that at her investigation Jackie was cleared of anti-Semitism.  This was not surprising given that this indefatiguable fighter against racism and fascism in Thanet, helped lead the Kent anti-racist network in their fight against the National Front in Dover.  You will never see Zionist groups at an anti-fascist mobilisation or doing work with asylum seekers or against state racism.  Jackie made the ‘mistake’ of privately discussing, in a Facebook post with friends, the involvement of Jews in financing the slave trade.  It is a historical fact that at certain times Jews did indeed play a major part in financing the slave trade.  That does not mean and contrary to their allegations, Jackie has never said that it meant, that Jews therefore were the primary financiers of the slave trade.
It is because of these libellous attacks on Jackie that we asked John McDonnell to pull out of the JLM rally against ‘anti-Semitism’ last Sunday, which he did.

Zionist ‘anti-racism’ is purely an establishment affair.  It is a right-wing form of ‘anti-racism’ which pillories the victims of racism and presents the racists in an anti-racist garb.  It is an inversion of reality.  Zionism manages to turn the victims of settler colonialism, the Palestinians, into the racists whereas the settlers are seen as the victims of those whose land they colonise.  In the Zionist fantasy world, the Palestinians attack them, not because the colonists steal their land, water and resources – it is because they are Jewish! 
Jeremy Newmark - Chair of the JLM and accused of lying by an employment tribunal in Fraser v UCU where Newmark tried to argue that supporting a boycott of Israel was anti-Semitic
What is most obscene is the Zionist use of the Holocaust to justify their settler colonial project.  Zionism predated the holocaust, which began in 1941, by some 60 years.  There was no connection between Palestine and the holocaust other than the fact that the Zionist movement sought to use the oppression and desperate situation of the Jews in Germany between 1933 and 1941 for their own advantage.  What was despicable was that even during the Holocaust the Zionists preferred to look the other way.  At no time during the years 1941 to 1945 was there a concerted Zionist campaign to save even a fragment of the Jews in Europe.  The only interest of the Zionist movement was in emigration, selective emigration to Palestine. 
the Zionists have been waging a concerted campaign to expel Jackie Walker
It is a matter of historical record that the Zionist movement agreed a trade deal with Nazi Germany in August 1933, just when the Jewish boycott of Hitler was taking off world wide.  It was agreed to by the Hitler regime precisely because it would destroy the Boycott of Nazi Germany.  The Boycott had had a devastating effect on Germany’s economy.  As Edwin  Black wrote in the ‘Transfer Agreement’ 

’For the entire first half of 1933 exports were down 51%.  ‘That six month loss would have been greater except that the anti-Nazi boycott had not really commenced until late March.’ [p.223]

The Zionists preferred to break the Boycott because they wished to lay their hands on the wealth of German Jewry regardless of the fact that only the Boycott had restrained the hands of the Nazis.  Between 1933 and 1939 60% of capital investment in Jewish Palestine was from Nazi Germany.  The behaviour of the Zionists in Hungary and elsewhere has been well documented by more honest Zionists such as Ben Hecht in Perfidy.  Suffice to say, the allegations of collaboration brought by the survivors of the Hungarian holocaust in Israel resulted in the Kasztner Trial in Israel between 1953 and 1958.  The verdict confirming collaboration by the Zionist leaders in Hungary  caused the fall of the second Labour Zionist government led by Moshe Sharrett in 1955.
faced with the choice between rescuing half of Germany's children in Palestine and all of them in Britain, Ben Gurion openly said that he preferred the former
It is a matter of historical record that the Zionist movement was disinterested in the Holocaust whilst it happened.  I post here 4 pages from ‘The Burning Ground’ the official biography of Ben-Gurion by Shabtai Teveth.
Ben Gurion openly stated that the Holocaust would be used towards the 'building of our country' that was the Zionists main imperative
Ben Gurion and the Jewish Agency Executive (the govt. in waiting) did not put rescuing Jews from the Nazis above Zionist work to build their state in Palestine
Jackie Walker raised the JLM's hackles by questioning the uniqueness of the holocaust.  To the Zionists it is a cardinal principle that the Holocaust is the property of the Jewish people alone. 
Lucy Dawidowicz, a right-wing Zionist historian, in the Holocaust and the Historians argued that subsuming Jewish losses under a universal or ecumenical classification is to effectively justify anti-Semitism. To Elie Wiesel it was a “betrayal of Jewish history”.  [Norman Finkelstein, Holocaust Industry, p.45]    As Israeli journalist and historian Boaz Evron wrote, the real purpose of Zionist Holocaust awareness ‘is not at an understanding of the past, but a manipulation of the future’. 
For daring to raise the idea that mass genocide or holocausts might be the property of all humanity, that Africans, Cambodians, Jews and others have suffered at one time or another equivalent acts of genocide, Jackie Walker has been vilified.  First into the fray was that well-known anti-racist newspaper, the Daily Telegraph.  In a bizarre article Revealed: Jeremy Corbyn ally says Holocaust Memorial Day should not just be about genocide of Jews Jackie was attacked for being ‘insensitive and provocative’ i.e. debating the questions surrounding the holocaust and the lessons it imparts.  Particularly galling was her statement that it would be "wonderful" if Holocaust Memorial Day was not just about the genocide of Jews. 

Although in theory HMD is open to all, in practice it centres around the holocaust of the Jews.  Every other mass act of genocide is left on the periphery.  On this Jackie is absolutely correct.  In Israel school children are taken on trips to Auschwitz, not to learn about the lessons of racism but to reinforce their racism.  Racism has become ‘a basic element in the everyday life of Israeli youth’ according to an article in Ha’aretz.  Israeli Teenagers: Racist and Proud of It.  This racism is as much part of the Labour Zionist tradition as that of Likud. 

Again according to Ha’aretz, which is Israel’s sole liberal daily:   ‘Nearly half of Israel's high school students do not believe that Israeli-Arabs are entitled to the same rights as Jews in Israel’. The same poll revealed that more than half the students would deny Arabs the right to be elected to the Knesset. Poll: Half of Israeli High Schoolers Oppose Equal Rights for Arabs
This is the racism that the JLM should be focussing on.  Instead they invite Israeli racists to the Labour Party conference. 


The Independent reports Momentum vice chair Jackie Walker apologises over 'appalling' Holocaust comments quotes Jackie as saying that if she had caused offence she apologises.  Jackie is and has been under an immense amount of pressure by those whose agenda is defending the United State’s guard dog in the Middle East.  A state which has acted as the sponsor and supporter of every death squad regime in Central and South America. A regime which was the closest friend of Apartheid South Africa.  In reality Jackie has nothing to apologise for.  The Zionists of course take offence when anyone questions their bogus assertions of ‘anti-Semitism’ precisely because they and we know that there is no anti-Semitism crisis in Labour.  It is a great pity that Jeremy Corbyn has bowed to the prevailing wind.  However it won’t do him any good because, as Kipling observed, paying Danegeld merely increases the appetite of the blackmailer and that is what Jeremy Newmark, Katz and the JLM are in the business of - blackmail.

The other ‘crime’ of Jackie Walker was to say that ‘I was looking for information and I still haven’t heard a definition of anti-Semitism that I can work with’ Possibly this is because the Zionist movement have been busy peddling for years the discredited   European Union Monitoring Committee’s Working Definition of Anti-Semitism.  It was a working definition which the Fundamental Rights Agency deleted from their website.   This definition of ‘anti-Semitism’ tried to marry opposition to Israel and comparisons between Nazism and Zionism with anti-Semitism.  The University College Union and the National Union of Students rejected it and even the Zionists finally admitted that the EU had ditched the agreement [Israel lobbyists finally concede that EU has ditched anti-Semitism “definition”].  The JLM however, led by Jeremy Newmark, who was openly accused by an employment tribunal of lying on oath, pretended at its ‘training session’ that the EUMC definition was the standard definition.  That is a lie and he knows it.
According to the Independent ‘Senior members of Momentum are "fuming" at her remarks’.  If this is true then they should take a long and hard look at their own behaviour.  Cowardice rarely pays.  Any sign of weakness from Momentum’s leadership will be capitalised on by the Zionists and the Tom Watsons of this world.  Momentum needs to stand firm and reject the attacks on Jackie Walker.  If Lansman backs down now, we will remove him from the leadership of Momentum when eventually a conference is called.
According to the Independent, The Holocaust Education Trust, founded by the paedophile Blairite Greville Janner, accused Jackie Walker of undermining and belittling “the distinct nature of the tragedy itself”.  This is utter rubbish.  Placing the Holocaust in an anti-racist context rather than exceptionalising and essentialising it, is exactly the opposite of undermining and belittling it.
Exceptionalising it by suggesting that it could only happen to the Jews when holocausts and mass genocide have been the lot of many people is to take the holocaust out of history.  Essentialising it is to divorce the holocaust from the reasons it occurred, in other words it wasn’t fascism, the destruction of the German labour movement, the medieval myths fashioned into modern racism, it was something about the Jews themselves.  The Zionist idea of understanding the Jewish Holocaust is not to understand it.
The HET stated that ‘The deliberate use of term Holocausts – plural – undermines and belittle the distinct nature of the tragedy itself, ignores that genocides are the result of diverse and unique factors, and also deprives the Jewish community of their collective memory.”  This is nonsense.  It is precisely by placing the Jewish holocaust in a  relative and historical context that one can make sense of it.  There are also other questions to ask such as why the holocaust has taken on this importance over 70 years after it occurred when it was barely mentioned in the first 20 years after it occurred.  The answer seems obvious.  As Israel moves further and further to the racist Right, as mobs chanting ‘Death to the Arabs’ become a regular feature of Israel’s political scene (it used to be ‘Death to the Jews’ in Europe) so the Holocaust is the shield to deflect criticism of Zionist racism.  What is obscene is the use of the holocaust in order to justify today’s racism.
Tony Greenstein

20 April 2015

Alison Saunders Protects Janner from Accusations of Child Abuse

Greville ‘Grovel’ Janner – Protected by his LFI, CST & Zionist Colleagues

Tony Greenstein
I have no way of knowing whether 'Grovel' Janner is guilty of the accusations of child abuse, including child rape.  What I do know is that these are extremely serious allegations and merit imprisonment for life if the person is found guilty.  
Accused of 22 offences against children - protected by DPP Alison Saunders & the Establishment

What I also know is that prominent members of the Establishment - such as Ed Balls MP and John Mann MP - chose to work with him in Labour Friends of Israel and the so-called Parliamentary Committee Against Anti-Semitism, despite knowing of the accusations and that Keith Vaz MP, Chair of the Home Affairs Select Committee, sought to change the laws on contempt so that 'honourable' rapists and child abusers could no longer be outed.
Janner was a right-wing Labour MP and kept the company of Tories
I also know that it is perfectly possible for someone accused of serious offences to be prosecuted.  Someone accused of unlawfully killing another person can be tried and found guilty but with a partial defence of diminished responsibility.  Of course, at the time Grovel was alleged to have perpetrated these offences there was no suggestion he was suffering from dementia.  But he now is and that is preventing his prosecution rather than being taken into account at the sentencing state (if found guilty).
Former Chief of Staff, Field Marshall Lord Bramall (left) is the only person to come out of this with credit.  He thwacked 'Grovel' round the head for his defence of Israel's invasion of Lebanon
Clearly with 22 alleged offences committed against 9 separate children there is a huge amount of evidence that Grovel committed the offences.  But that should be for a Judge and Jury to decide, not for Alison Saunders, the DPP, who should be dismissed for perpetuating the cover-up of Janner's alleged offences.

Greville Janner is known to readers of Private Eye as Grovel Janner, a suitable epithet for a man who I only encountered on two occasions.  Oily and slimy, he entirely merited comparison with Uriah Heep.
'Grovel' in more confident times
The Zionist institutions that Janner bestowed his favours on need to come clean and apologise to his victims.  I realise that they spend much of their time defending Israel right or wrong, including Israel’s abuse of Palestinian children (beatings, torture, rape, sexual abuse, shackling)
The hypocrite uses the Holocaust to hide behind
Janner was an office holder with a number of Zionist organisations.  Vice President of The Association for Jewish Youth and the The Jewish Leadership Council, which represents Zionist capitalists.  He was President of The Association of Jewish Ex-Servicemen and Women.
'Grovel' Janner was ably supported by other MPs like Keith Vaz
He was also on the Advisory Board of the Zionist vigilante group and erstwhile ‘charity’ the Community Security Trust, which includes in its remit the protection of Jewish children from anti-Semitic attacks.  Perhaps the Community Security Trust will extend this to protecting children, including Jewish children, from sexual abusers and rapists?
Grovel's dementia didn't prevent him staying on at the Lords
Janner was also Vice President of The World Jewish Congress, another Zionist body, Chairman of The Holocaust Educational Trust and Director of The United Jewish Israel Appeal, which raises funds in order that the Israeli state can continue to abuse and murder Palestinians, including children.
Grovel as an MP delivering petition with child
The first occasion I met him was when giving evidence to the Parliamentary Committee on Employment of which he was Chairman from 1992-96.  I had been asked to give evidence as Secretary of  Brighton Unemployed Centre.  He told me, after having ascertained I held an MA in Imperial History. that I was the best qualified unemployed person he had met, which probably showed the limits of his engagement with the real world.  The other time we met was leafleting a Labour Party/Labour Friends of Israel meeting when he considered a minor offence of shoplifting of great import.  I guess that offences against property were considered more heinous to this son of the British establishment than offences against children. 

Apart from being Chairman of the Board of Deputies of British Jews (1978-84), a thoroughly pro-Zionist organisation which did its best to undermine the fight against fascism in the ‘30’s in the Jewish community.  It represents the Jewish petit-bourgeoisie and a section of the Jewish establishment.

Janner also founded the Holocaust Educational Trust.  The Holocaust is a good excuse to demonise the Palestinians whilst making yourself feel good.  A QC since 1971, he was a Labour MP from 1970 to 1997; since then he has been a member of the House of Lords.

Grovel was made a life peer as Baron Janner of Braunstone in 1997. He is President of John Mann MP and Dennis MacShane’s All-Party Parliamentary Group against Anti-Semitism, and chairs the All-Party Britain-Israel Parliamentary Group.  It’s not surprising that these parliamentary cretins didn’t notice his dementia but then again, since  his diagnosis is rather convenient, perhaps that is understandable.

A man who worked in Janner’s office during 1991, soon after graduating from university, said: “It was a matter of office gossip that he liked boys, or young men in their mid-20s. He would have friendships with bright young men, and would go swimming with them in his club. He would go for a swim, then have breakfast, then work. Then after lunch he would lie out on the sofa in his constituency office.”

He was still an active peer for several years after his ‘Alzheimer’ was first diagnosed in 2009. He made his last speech – fittingly on Israel and Palestine – in February 2013. The register shows that he was a regular attender in the Lords until the end of December 2013.

Greville Janner: How MPs rallied to defence of Labour peer 'unfairly put through hell by a wicked slur' Independent 16.4.15. 

Labour Friends of Israel - like most pro-Israel groups - has often tried to discredit criticism of Israel by conflating it with 'anti-Semitism'. Janner, who was an LFI vice-chair, talked of the ‘viciously and often notoriously anti-Israel" left liberal media.’ Rabbi David Goldberg, “Let's have a sense of proportion”, The Guardian, 26.1. 02

Balls & Janner

The disgusting Ed Balls who consorted with Janner now seeks to distance the Labour Party from this creature – Balls is thoroughly pro-Zionist and has never spoken out against the abuse of Palestinian children by Israel


Clegg washing his hands of his Zionist colleague.  With the Lib Dems having to answer questions about Cyril Smith MP for whom they covered it must all be embarrassing

Rt Hon Anne McGuire MP, LFI chair
Michael Dugher MP
Louise Ellman MP
Michael McCann MP
Rachel Reeves MP
Jonathan Reynolds MP
Baroness Ramsay of Cartvale

Janner was the son of Sir Barnett Janner, former Chairman of the Zionist Federation of Great Britain. Another pillar of the Jewish Establishment and Liberal MP for Leicester North West which he inherited.  He was a member of the notorious Blairite LFI, whose supporters include:

Ed Balls MP
Luciana Berger MP
Rt Hon Hazel Blears MP
Rt Hon David Blunkett MP
Rt Hon Liam Byrne MP
Rosie Cooper MP
Jim Fitzpatrick MP
Rt Hon Caroline Flint MP
Barry Gardiner MP
Mary Glindon MP
Andrew Gwynne MP
Fabian Hamilton MP
Tom Harris MP
Rt Hon Margaret Hodge MP
Sharon Hodgson MP
Ivan Lewis MP
Rt Hon Anne McGuire MP
Meg Munn MP
Rt Hon Jim Murphy MP
Rt Hon John Spellar MP
Chuka Umunna MP
Dave Watts MP
John Woodcock MP
Rt Hon Shaun Woodward MP
Rt Hon Lord Anderson of Swansea
Lord Beecham DL
Lord Clarke of Hampstead CBE
Rt Hon Lord Clinton-Davis
Lord Davies of Coity CBE
Rt Hon Lord Foster of Bishop Auckland
Rt Hon Lord Foulkes of Cumnock
Lord Harrison
Lord Haskel
Dr Baroness Hayter
Lord Janner of Braunstone QC

A veritable rogues gallery of the Parliamentary Labour Party.  Only Dennis MacShane, the former MP for Rotherham, has been removed.  No doubt on account his time spent as a guest of Her Majesty.

One of Grovel’s few subsequent forays into the public eye came in 2002, when Uri Geller, a friend, arranged for him to accompany Michael Jackson on a tour of Parliament. The trio dropped in on a party for Labour MP Paul Boateng, where Jackson agreed to sing happy birthday.  Boateng himself is rumoured to have been shunted off as High Commissioner to South Africa because of child abuse allegations.  See

In September, the Chief Constable of Derbyshire, Mick Creedon, was reported as saying his 1989 inquiries as a detective sergeant into ‘credible evidence’ of child abuse by Janner were blocked by superiors.  see  

Janner had been named in open court as an abuser during the 1991 trial of Leicester children’s home manager Frank Beck. MPs, including the current chair of the Commons Home Affairs Committee, Keith Vaz, rallied around Janner following trial reports. In December 1991 some called for a review of the law of contempt following what fellow Leicester MP Vaz called a ‘cowardly attack’ on Janner’s character. In 1991 Alex Carlisle QC, a Liberal-Democrat was one of the MPs supporting Greville Janner following the Beck trial. Hansard records him saying of Janner: ‘He is a man of determination and enthusiasm whose integrity and will power have crossed party lines.’  see and

Another defender of Janner was ex-left and New Labour Minister Chris Mullins.

Attorney General’s Office
Victoria Street
London
SW1H 0NF


19 April, 2015

Dear Attorney General

Reference: CPS decision on Lord Janner of Blackstone

I write in my capacity as a potential Member of Parliament to challenge the decision of the DPP, Alison Saunders, not to prosecute Lord Janner for alleged crimes, namely 16 indecent assaults between 1969 and 1988, and 6 counts of buggery on under aged boys between 1972 and 1988.

I have read the CPS’ justification for their decision here http://cps.gov.uk/news/latest_news/lord_janner/

Please do not refer this letter downwards to the CPS, and please do not treat it as a complaint against the CPS. I have been in lengthy correspondence with the CPS and have used their complaint service already, and I have no confidence in their decisions and processes, for the reasons set out below. I wish to challenge the judgment of the DPP directly. This is now a matter for the Chief Law Officer.

Alison Saunders in her justification document accepts that the evidential basis for a criminal prosecution of Janner is sound. However, she argues that there is no public interest in prosecuting him because he is unfit to plead.

She bases this argument on the evidence of four medical experts who agree that he has dementia due to Alzheimer’s disease, and that they have  “general agreement” as to the level of cognitive ability on a Mini  Mental State examination.

However, there is no reference to any brain scan having been carried our. If scans were performed but reports on the scans were left out of the CPS justification document, there has been a failure of due diligence in reporting, and Saunders should be rebuked.

If on the other hand brain scans on Janner were not performed, there has been serious negligence. In my extensive correspondence with the CPS on this case I explicitly requested several times that brain scans should be carried out, because they give objective evidence that goes far beyond medical history taking and examination. If they were not carried out Saunders should be invited to consider her position.

If we accept for the sake of argument that Janner is indeed suffering from Alzheimer’s disease, there are three precedents where paedophiles have been tried and convicted of sexual crimes against children. The names are David Massingham, John Hayford and Michael Collingwood. I can supply references if requested, but the CPS should be able to find them.

Either Alison Saunders knew of these cases and negligently failed to deal with them in her report, or she did not know of them, in which case there was a failure of due diligence as a lawyer.

There is no provision in the CPS Code of Practice to exempt people with dementia from facing trial. In the absence of such provision, but in the presence of sufficient evidential basis to proceed, Alison Saunders has used the public interest test.

Now clearly there is a major public interest in bringing to court people who are abused of serious sexual crimes against children, especially children who for one reason or another were in the care of public organisations.

First, sexual abuse has a devastating effect on the subsequent lives of survivors of abuse, and there is a need to demonstrate that society will not tolerate child abuse, even if carried out by VIPs.

Second, the Law itself comes into disrepute if there is a public perception that VIP status confers immunity against justice. You must be aware that already there exists a common perception that this is the case. This view is particularly prevalent in the community of survivors of sexual abuse. If Janner escapes trial, this perception will increase, both among survivors and among the general public. It is not in the public interest for there to be a perception that there is one law for the rich, another for the poor.

Against these two major public interest arguments, the CPS advances the minor public interest argument that money spent in bringing Janner to court could be wasted as he is likely to be judged unfit to plead. This argument is extremely weak. The expenditure would be trivial in comparison with other cases that have failed.

The precedents referred to above are worthy of being considered in court.

Most importantly, a major legal argument needs to be entertained, namely whether a person who passes the evidential test but who might not be fit to plead for reasons of dementia should be tried as if in absentia.
The defence could test the evidence given by Janner’s alleged victims. His accusers could be invited to ask if they can positively identify him, possibly by reference to body characteristics such as moles.
It should be noted also that in coming to her conclusion, Saunders rejected advice of one of UK’s principal authorities on sex offences. Eleanor Laws QC, leading counsel to Leicestershire police’s investigation into Janner, recommended that he be put on trial despite his age and dementia.

In the light of this, the DPP must have consulted with other people in coming to her decision. The names of these people, the advice they gave, and the degree of pressure that they put on the DPP should be made clear to the public.

In conclusion, let me summarise the questions I am raising:
1. The question of whether or not scans have been carried out must be settled.
2. The question of precedents must be considered.
3. The question of public interest, major and minor, needs to be reviewed.
4. Who gave advice to the DPP to persuade her to come to her conclusion?

I look forward to a timely response to all the points made in this letter.

Respectfully yours

Dr Richard Lawson
MB BS, MRCPsych
Parliamentary Candidate, Weston Constituency, Green Party

See 

Perhaps the person who comes out best in all of this is one Field Marshal Lord Bramall.  After an argument over the Lebanon conflict, he thwacked his fellow peer, the 78-year-old Lord Janner!