The Refusal of the Trade Union Leaders to Meet the Challenge of the Conservative's Class War is Why These Traitors Need to be Replaced
Registration
Link
https://us02web.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_8aQ8h5iiStCTYVGDbZl_Sw
‘Crisis What Crisis’ is the
phrase that Labour Prime Minister James Callaghan was reputed to have uttered
as he returned from a visit abroad to the Winter of Discontent in 1979. It
could equally apply to the Labour and Conservative front benches.
As the Royal College of Nursing,
which is more of a professional association than a union, vote for their first
ever strike, the political class seems to have taken Callaghan’s message to
heart.
Under Starmer it is difficult to
put a piece of paper between Labour and the Tories. Instead of defending
refugees against Suella Braverman’s racist rhetoric of an ‘invasion’, Rachel
Reeves attacked
her for not deporting more asylum seekers.
When Sunak contemplates ‘eye-watering’ cuts in public
expenditure, Labour fails to point out that a wealth tax and clamping down on
tax evaders would more than fill the fiscal gap.
Of course Starmer has more urgent
priorities such as eliminating
what is left of the Labour Left. Deselecting one of the few socialist Labour
MPs, by hook or by crook (mainly the latter) is of far more importance than
confronting the Tory agenda.
It was therefore no surprise that
when a rash of strikes broke out in the summer, led by the RMT, that Starmer’s
response was to refuse to support the strike and to forbid
the Shadow Cabinet from joining the picket lines.
It would look bad apparently and detract
from Labour as a serious party of government to be seen on picket lines. This
despite the massive public
support for the strike.
Schmoozing with hedge fund owners
and multi-millionaires was not seen as a problem of optics. Supporting further
privatisation of the NHS is no problem for Starmer and Wes
Streeting, the Shadow Health Secretary.
We should bear in mind that Shirley
Williams, a founder of the SDP, when she was Education Minister in the
Callaghan Government, joined
the picket lines at Grunwicks. This demonstrates just how right-wing Starmer
is.
Energy has risen 100%
in one year and coupled with the crisis
for food banks and child poverty it might be thought that this would prompt a
concerted trade union response. Especially since the government has announced proposals
to outlaw any effective strike in the public sector.
Yet what is the
response of the trade union leaders to the gauntlet thrown down by this government?
A determined attempt to avoid any confrontation with the Tory government. It is
as if they have learnt nothing from the halving of trade union membership
since Thatcher became Prime Minister.
In the early 1970s
when unofficial strikes were extremely popular and union leaders struggled to
control their own members, the TUC was forced into organising an Emergency
Conference which voted to defy the union laws. When Ted Heath and Sir John
Donaldson at the National Industrial Relations Court confronted the Pentonville
5 dockers who were sent to gaol the TUC called a general strike.
This
was enough for a hitherto unknown figure called the Official Solicitor to make
an appearance before Lord Denning at the Court of Appeal. The result was the decision of Donaldson was
overturned and the dockers freed. Never before in its history had the Court of
Appeal acted so fast! The House of Lords later reversed the Court of Appeal but
by then the dockers had won anyway.
The most popular and
well supported strike this summer has been that of the RMT. But instead of calling an all-out strike and
demanding that the TUC provide them with the means to sustain it, Mick Lynch
and the RMT leadership have instead staged a series of one day strikes whose
only effect is to postpone the day of reckoning.
Even worse they have called
off the strikes as they begin negotiations with the employers. Instead of
ensuring that the rail bosses feel the heat during their negotiations they have
demobilised their own membership.
The CWU leadership is
even worse. When Royal Mail threatened legal action if a series of strikes went
ahead, they rushed to call off all the strikes, including those which weren’t under
threat. Royal Mail has meanwhile
derecognised the union yet its fake left leadership still pose as class
fighters at Campaign Group rallies.
The key problem facing
the trade unions today is a historic one. The divorce between economics and
politics. Even those trade union leaders who advocate greater militancy, like
UNITE’s Sharon Graham, have little or nothing to say politically. Graham, like Lynch, has pledged
her support for Starmer saying that she was ‘not interested in the internal game-playing
within a political party’ as if the
battle between left and right is simply a game of football. In the battle between Left and Right in the Labour Party Graham
has no position. All she supports is a
limited militancy divorced from
political change.
The
idea, beloved of the Socialist Workers Party, that all that matters is
increasing the number of strikes and everything else will take care of itself,
is a classic case of syndicalism. That you don’t need to forge a political
leadership or challenge the capitalist system itself, in all its
manifestations. All that is necessary is to win the battle for wage increases
with the employer. The problem is that in a society based on profit employers
can plead poverty and blackmail workers into accepting wage increases if they
want to keep their jobs.
Strikes
take place within a legal framework set by the government. If striking is made
more difficult because of onerous legal restrictions then it is going to be harder
to win a strike. And if rail unions are prevented from staging effective
strikes by new laws then militancy by its own is not a solution.
We face
the most bitter class war offensive in living memory. The energy costs cannot
be brought back down unless the energy companies are nationalised. Strike
action cannot be successful if trade unions have one hand tied behind their
backs. Yet who among the union leaders is willing to make a stand or call for
generalised action?
What is needed
is the equivalent of the action the ‘markets’ i.e finance capital took when it went
on strike when Lizz Truss decided to finance tax cuts by increasing government borrowing,
i.e. a general strike. The only way to defeat the anti-trade union laws is to break
them. Yet the TUC, whose only historical function has been to betray the working
class, runs a mile from the idea of confrontation with the government and the
courts.
What is
worse is that even the ‘left’ trade union leaders – Mick Lynch, Sharon Graham,
Dave Ward – concentrate on sectional disputes and avoid the idea of a political
confrontation with the government like the plague. The fact that the
capitalists use extra parliamentary pressure to secure what they want makes no
difference. They are content to feed off the crumbs from the table. The RMT has
a wage claim for less than the rate of inflation.
The cost
of living crisis that now faces millions of people demands a political challenge
to the neo-liberal system that transfers wealth from the poorest to the
richest.
The one
group of people to benefit from the pandemic was British billionaires. Their numbers
increased
by 24% to 171 and their total wealth increased by 21.7%. Whilst health workers faced
death and exhaustion at work, the super-rich did very well out of others’
misery. This is the neo-liberal ‘trickle-down’ economics that Liz Truss but
also Rishi Sunak and Starmer represent.
This is
why the Socialist Labour Network had decided to hold a public meeting with a
range of speakers including:
Ken Loach -
award-winning film-maker and socialist, will share his ideas on how to advance
towards a new party
Lindsey
German - author, socialist activist and spokesperson
for the People's Assembly against Austerity, on how to build the fightback
against the Tories
Candy
Gregory - independent socialist councillor, Thanet District
Council, on the campaign against conditions at the Manston Refugee Centre
Carel Buxton - SLN
national Steering Group, Newham Socialist Labour and Newham Enough is
Enough, will put the case for SLN's appeal for the formation of a new mass
working class party.
As Sunak
struggles to stabilise the Tories, Starmer lurches ever further to the right.
This Socialist Labour Network Online Public Meeting therefore comes at a critical time. How can we step up and unify the fightback against the Tories? Can we break Starmer's stranglehold? Above all, how can we take forward the fight for a new, mass, working-class party?
This is the most accurate description of the current state of our political landscape I have read. Imy hope is that the meeting is Zoomed.
ReplyDelete"As the Royal College of Nursing, which is more of a professional association than a union"
ReplyDeleteAnd Id add a middle class one at that, not that that negates the demand for a pay rise. Perhaps they could also include and show solidarity to other NHS workers - there are plenty of vital yet lower paid staff.
The RMT were representing all transport workers, so it would be could for RCN to take note.