24 January 2014

The Most Obnoxious Participant in the Demonstrations Against Sodastream


An Odball Named Shaike Rozanski
His name is shaike Rozanski although at first I though he was referred to as ‘shaker’ on account of his unusual mannerisms. His appalling behaviour, although no doubt typical of the average Israeli settler (note – not the average Israeli) even casts the JDL’s Simon Cobb's in a (relatively) good light.
Shaiker in the middle is obsessed with Omar Barghouti - his favourite theme (when not attacking Jewish anti-Zionists)           is 'what about Syria' etc.

Knowing that I am ill he openly hopes I will dies because no one will miss me! He refers to people as ‘dogs’ and calls them Kapos. After a little of this I riposted back that he was a typical Jewish Nazi.

Passer by reads our leaflet - we distribute about 800 per week -  the Zionists only abuse 

Shaike is Managing Director at ICTS (UK/IRELAND) LTD, which is a very large international airport security company Brighton, United Kingdom Aviation & 
Carrying the message each week
Fuhrer Cobbs seems thoroughly fedup
Aerospace, although find it hard to imagine him at work! Or anyone to work with. 

His company will do doubt be very pleased to see above video & have their name connected to such a person & behaviour. If anyone is on Linkedin, here is ICTS site



https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=K39rRTCkR78

His profile is at and despite coming to these shores, he also seems to spend a lot of time belittling the UK to camera although it's been a while now.

This is another video of him outside the Bethlehem Unwrapped simulation of the apartheid wall in London.

I have personally made a complaint about him to the Police about calling me a ‘kapos’ which he openly admitted even though Cobbs made a complaint against me for the same reason. The Kapos were concentration camp inmates who were forced to work with the Nazis. After 3 months they were shot and another group selected. They had no choice in what they did and at Auschwitz, Treblinka and Sobibor they helped initiate the revolts that led to the escape of hundreds and the destruction of one gas/crematorium at Auschwitz.

What is far worse was the open collaboration between the Nazis and Zionists and the fact that the Zionists actually welcomed the Nazis to power – see their letter in Lucy Dawidowic’s War Against the Jews


The Zionist Odball, Shaiker, is spoken to by the  Police, after a complaint was made by me of the use of the term 'kapos', especially when the Zionists were the ones who collaborated with the Nazis and blocked both information about the Holocaust when it happened and attempts by Jews to gain refuge  anywhere but Palestine.

19 January 2014

Gaza fishermen suffer 85 percent income loss as Israeli siege, attacks continue

Joe Catron , The Electronic Intifada, Gaza City
29 December 2013

Palestinian fishermen bring their catches ashore at the port in Gaza City. (Mohammed Asad / APA images)
Fishing Boat poses  real threat to Israeli warship
On 17 December, Palestinian fishermen and their supporters erected a tent — a traditional venue for protest, as well as celebration and mourning — inside the Gaza seaport.

“It was to highlight the situation, the crimes of the Israelis against fishermen here,” said Amjad al-Shrafi, treasurer of the General Union of Fishermen. “We wanted to send a message about the blockade against the fishermen and how we cannot fish freely.”
Gaza Fishermen
The protest, organized under the title Free the Holy Land Sea, ended two days later with the delivery of a letter to the nearby office of the United Nations Special Coordinator for the Middle East Peace Process, demanding international protection for fishermen.

Over three days, hundreds of well-wishers visited a crowded tent decorated with banners and posters supporting fishermen. The organizations represented on its walls ranged from human rights centers to prisoner support groups.  
Under fire
“One of our main goals was to push governments around the world to force Israel to give fishermen free lives and let us sail without any limits,” al-Shrafi said. “It’s our right to sail freely in our waters.”  “Another was to pressure the Israeli forces to release the boats and fishermen they have captured.”
fishing boats & gunboats
Palestinian fishermen in coastal waters off the Gaza Strip frequently come under fire by Israeli naval forces, which target their boats on both sides of a boundary imposed by Israel.

fishing boats
Israel deploys its gunships into Palestinian waters using an information technology infrastructure administered by Hewlett-Packard (“Technologies of control: The case of Hewlett-Packard,” Who Profits, December 2011).

Through its subsidiary, HP Israel, the US corporation won a contract to run the Israeli navy’s computer and communications network in August 2006 (“HP Israel wins navy IT outsourcing contract,” Globes, 14 August 2006).

The fishing area permitted by Israel, which doubled in size as part of the ceasefire agreement ending eight days of Israeli attacks on the Gaza Strip and retaliatory fire by Palestinian resistance groups in November 2012, now officially reaches six nautical miles from the shore.

But fishermen say the Israeli navy often shoots at them and sometimes captures them and their boats well within the zone it ostensibly allows them.

Fishermen and supporters hold posters with images of colleagues captured by Israeli forces, in Gaza City on 19 December 2013.

(Joe Catron)
“We were far from the prohibited zone, 500 meters away,” said Saddam Abu Warda, a 23-year-old fisherman whom the Israeli navy captured along with his 18-year-old brother Mahmoud around 9am on 10 November.
Fisherman-Abu-Nayim-001
“They were shouting, ‘You must get out of here in five minutes.’ We had to cut the net to pull it out of the water. Then they started to fire bullets close to our hasaka [small boat]. As they came close to us, their boat looked like a big building with lights.”

The Abu Wardas’ small boat had no engine. “We tried to escape by paddling quickly,” Saddam Abu Warda said. “They forced us to take off our clothes and raise our hands. They were firing bullets in the air and in front of our hasaka. One soldier was shouting, ‘You have to leave your hasaka and get in the water.’ I was shocked. I couldn’t move. I didn’t know why.”

Finally, gunfire forced the brothers into the cold water. “They didn’t stop firing bullets over our heads,” Abu Warda said. “I was far from my brother. He started shouting, saying, ‘I am injured.’ He wasn’t able to keep swimming. I swam back to my brother to try and save him. His blood was [spilling] in the water. Then two small boats came close to us. They pulled my brother from the water. They didn’t take me.”

When Abu Warda reached the Israeli gunship, he lost consciousness after soldiers bound, hooded and kicked him. He awoke in a detention facility in Ashdod, a port in present-day Israel beside his brother Mahmoud, whose right abdomen was stitched by military physicians. The brothers said that Israeli bullets caused the wound.

During an interrogation after he awoke, an Israeli soldier tried to convince him otherwise. “I told him, ‘Three of your gunboats were around us. They were firing bullets. My brother’s blood was everywhere in the water. He was injured by your soldiers.’”

After a lengthy interrogation that continued both in Ashdod port and after their transfer to a detention center by the Erez crossing between Gaza and present-day Israel, Israeli forces released the Abu Wardas into the northern Gaza town of Beit Hanoun around 10pm — 13 hours after their capture. Their boat and its equipment remained behind.

“We have three hasakas in the Ashdod port,” Abu Warda said of his family’s prior losses to the Israeli navy.

 Severe damage

The Abu Wardas’ experiences echo many more documented in a new report by the Palestinian Centre for Human Rights (PCHR). The PCHR, which supported the Free the Holy Land Sea campaign, is translating the document — already published in Arabic — into English.
Fishermen and supporters
Over four years, from 1 September 2009 through 31 August 2013, the Israeli navy killed two fishermen, wounded 24, and captured 147, according to the report. The navy also seized 45 boats and destroyed or damaged 113 more.

The report also records the losses incurred by about thirty bombings of four fishing ports during Israel’s November 2012 attacks on the Gaza Strip, including damages to an additional 80 boats and destruction of a health clinic and a youth center used by fishermen.

“There was severe damage to different fishing facilities during the military offensive,” said Khalil Shaheen, director of PCHR’s economic and social rights unit.  "At the ports in Gaza City, Middle Area, Khan Younis and Rafah, different facilities were targeted and destroyed.”


“The report also documents the impact of the total damage to fishermen and the fishing sector,” Shaheen added. “One of the main impacts was the loss of 85 percent of income in the fishing sector, as the result of access restrictions and the naval blockade.”

Casualties have continued to mount in the four months since the period covered by the report ended. The PCHR publishes regular reports on human rights abuses in Gaza. These reports indicate that Israel has shot at fishermen at least 37 times since September, as well as seizing six boats.
“I would like to thank all the solidarity campaigns who were involved in this action and show solidarity with Palestinian fishermen,” al-Shrafi said.

“We ask that the international community continue to pressure their governments, to ask for dignity and a free life for us.”

Joe Catron is a US activist in Gaza, Palestine. He co-edited The Prisoners’ Diaries: Palestinian Voices from the Israeli Gulag, an anthology of accounts by detainees freed in the 2011 prisoner exchange. He blogs at joecatron.wordpress.com and tweets @jncatron.

The Attacks on the Christian Village of Tel Rumeida

Only in a Police State do the Police Arrest The Victims of the attacks of Thugs

tel rumeida
 Words can’t describe how the Christian Palestinians of Tel Rumeida (whose disperson our fundamentalists here support  who are attacked by the neo-Nazi settlers of Kiryat Arba (where the supporters of  Meir Kahane are extremely strong) are arrested by Israeli soldiers, not their attackers.  Our puppet of Foreign Minister, Haig, of course says nothing.

Settlers arrive at the Azzeh family land

Settler claiming his 'birthright'

Life in Tel Rumeida

By Chelli Stanley
Tel Rumeida Project
October 11, 2005
Though each area of Palestine can be said to be unique, Tel Rumeida is truly a world unto itself. Located in the Israeli-controlled area of Hebron, Tel Rumeida is a small neighborhood living out the brutal extravagance of direct Israeli occupation. If Tel Rumeida is viewed as a microcosm of the Israeli plan for Palestine, the sometimes subtle realities of Palestinian life under occupation and the type of Palestinian state Israel desires can be more easily comprehended.

The illegal settlement blocks in Tel Rumeida with Hasham’s olive trees in the foreground
Nearly every tactic used by Israel to create its merciless occupation is employed in Tel Rumeida: displacement, imprisonment, economic strangulation, extreme militarization, arbitrary detention, land confiscation, disruption of normal Palestinian life, settler violence, soldier brutality, government complicity with illegal settler acts, and daily humiliation.

Soldiers place an Italian activist in a head-lock
Soldiers twist Imad Al Atrash’s arms behind his back to tie with zip-ties
The Palestinian residents of Tel Rumeida never experience the living of a normal day. The nearly three years of curfew they endured during this intifada permanently scar the lives of every resident and the community itself. The five soldier stations and recently modernized electronic checkpoint currently located on three streets make it nearly impossible for residents to walk anywhere unhindered. The two settlements, Beit Haddasseh and the Tel Rumeida settlement, housing some of the West Bank’s most extreme settlers (including members of Kach, designated by Israel as a terrorist organization,) and located at the top and bottom of the Tel Rumeida neighborhood, ensure that Palestinians living here will, at the very least, have a daily reminder that they are no longer welcome in their own neighborhood. The endless abandoned homes and forcibly-closed stores, many of them sprayed with violently racist settler graffiti, do their own part in contributing to the solemnly eerie atmosphere of the neighborhood.

Settlers look on as the Palestinians attacked are arrested
The living conditions in Tel Rumeida are that of apartheid. Palestinians are not allowed to drive their vehicles on the streets; they are for Israelis only. Palestinian residents must carry or cart everything to their homes while settlers take joyrides through the neighborhood. Palestinians are forced to take winding, dangerous, secondary paths to reach their houses while Israeli settlers use the primary paths. Though the Palestinian residents do not participate in the violence which is so unceasingly apparent in the neighborhood, it is they who are stopped by the Israeli soldiers and forced to lift their shirts and open their purses. Though it is mainly the settler children, immune by law from prosecution, who terrorize Palestinian children and adults and who attack soldiers, it is the Palestinian children who are constantly stopped, who have their schoolbags searched, who are yelled at and hit by soldiers. It is Palestinians who must wait in lines to enter the electronic checkpoint every time they enter or leave their community. It is Palestinians who are harassed and humiliated by nearly every conceivable variety of Israeli law enforcement official as are in existence.

Israeli settlers rule Tel Rumeida. Young settler boys saunter through the Tel Rumeida streets stoning or attacking homes and Palestinian residents at will under the indifferent eyes of Israeli soldiers and police. Damaged and destroyed Palestinian homes, gardens, water pipes, phone lines, and windows live as a testament to the wrath of the settlers’ former deeds. The absolute impunity with which these settlers operate, combined with their overt camaraderie with the Israeli soldiers and policemen, are nothing less than a palpable message to the Palestinian residents of the neighborhood that their safety is not an Israeli concern.

Nearly every Palestinian resident of Tel Rumeida has a disturbingly devastating story, such as that of a young pregnant mother who has had two miscarriages in as many years as a direct result of Israeli violence. Last year, she was two months pregnant and, after Israeli soldiers came inside her home and fired their weapons, was found lying on the floor of her home, bleeding, and later lost her child. This year, only a month ago, pregnant with twins and home alone, her house was attacked by seven armed settlers screaming death threats. Soldiers stationed less than 30 meters from her home did not respond to her calls for help during the 20 minute attack. Two hours later, lying again on the floor of her home, she lost her first twin. Later in a hospital operation, she lost the second. Since the death of her twins, she has suffered from nervous attacks and has been repeatedly hospitalized for collapsing.
The children of Tel Rumeida, though they are many, almost never play outside. Those who do venture out run off the streets at the first sound of an approaching settler vehicle and run into their homes when groups of settlers walk by. Even the youngest child of Tel Rumeida has learned indelible lessons about the type of people their Israeli settler neighbors are and their own place in the neighborhood, acting out these lessons on a daily basis.

Tel Rumeida is one of the few areas in Palestine living under direct Israeli occupation. The outcome of this occupation is a brutalized Palestinian community, economically devastated and imprisoned, living under the endless violence of their Israeli neighbors. Tel Rumeida is the Israeli occupation writ large.

3 Arrested as Palestinians attacked by settlers and soldiers in Tel Rumeida

in Photo Story, Press Releases, Reports October 22, 2012

By Vicky Blackwell and Elyana Belle
Photographs by Vicky Blackwell,
22 October 2012 | International Solidarity Movement, West Bank
UPDATE: 10.30pm – All 3 men have now been released without charge.

Today, a group of settlers from the illegal settlement in Tel Rumeida arrived at Hashem Azzeh’s olive grove next to his house at around 12.30pm, whilst he and his family were harvesting their olives, yelling for everyone to get off of “their” land.

Hashem and his family were on their land harvesting olives for the first time in 5 years after being granted permission from the District Civil Liaison. He was accompanied by several members of his family as well as activists from the International Solidarity Movement. The situation quickly escalated as settlers pushed the Palestinians in order to try and enter Hashem’s house.

Within ten minutes the soldiers arrived and began to separate the Palestinian family and internationals and siding with the Israeli settlers. Arguments continued with both sides yelling “this is my land,” regardless of the fact that Hashem has the deeds to the land. The settlers were also heard shouting “This is not your land, this is the land of the Jewish people.”

At this point around ten more settlers had come down and joined in, shouting abuse at Hashem and his family. The soldiers pushed the Palestinians and internationals back towards Hashem’s house threatening to arrest anyone who did not obey. The soldiers grabbed a young Palestinian man by the name of Imad Al Atrash who was video taping standing behind international activists: pushed him against the wall and zip-tied his arms behind his back.

Then they went after an International activist trying to arrest him for taking video footage. While trying to escape they grabbed another of the International activists standing by, put him in a headlock on the ground and arrested him. Jawad Abu Eisheh who had arrived in solidarity with his neighbors was also captured and arrested (this comes only 9 days after Jawad and his family were also attacked by settlers whilst harvesting their olives nearby, see:
Imad Al Atrash being arrested by Israeli soldiers for being attacked
The two Palestinians and Italian activist have been arrested and taken to a police station in the illegal settlement of Kiryat Arba.

The district of Tel Rumeida is heavily militarized and contains the homes of both Israeli settlers and Palestinians. Hasham’s family moved to Tel Rumeida in 1950 after being forcibly removed from their homes in what is now Israel. The Tel Rumeida settlement was installed in 1984.

In an attack in 2006 the settlers smashed Hasham’s nephews’ teeth in with a stone. That same year his wife (3 months pregnant at the time) was attacked and subsequently miscarried. Again in 2006 she was attacked, this time 4 months pregnant, and again, suffered from a miscarriage due to the attack.
The settlers living directly over Hasham’s house have also in the past raided his house, (bullet-holes near his front door show when the settlers shot live ammunition at his house), they cut his water-pipes and poisoned his water tank, cut his trees down in his garden and have physically attacked and assaulted him and his family as well as breaking-into and vandalizing his house on several occasions. Online text with pictures of the destruction of the orchard is available at
Jawad Abu Eisheh is thrown against the wall by soldiers and detained

Orchard leveled at Tel Rumeida to make way for settlement expansion

 On 5 January 2014, CPTers learned that a bulldozer had begun leveling a large tract of a Palestinian orchard for the expansion of the Tel Rumeida settlement complex on the previous evening. Two CPTers visited with Hani Abu Haikel, long-time CPT partner, on 7 January to learn more details.
According to Abu Haikel, his family has held a 99-year lease, of which twenty-five years are left, on the orchard that was demolished to create the outpost. The Abu Haikels had originally leased the land from the Bajaio family, Palestinian Jews whose family the Abu Haikels sheltered during the Hebron Massacre in 1929. Then they leased the land from the Jordanian government, which occupied the area after 1949, and the Israeli government after 1967. The Israeli government has blocked the lease Abu Haikel’s family holds on this area in order to allow the settlers to continue construction on this new, outpost. Police arrested Abu Haikel and his cousin on 5 January for being in a ‘closed military zone’ when they asked by what right the settlers were destroying their mature almond trees. They then banned the two men from going within 250 meters of the site.

Abu Haikel is nostalgic for past centuries when Palestinian Jews and Muslims lived in more harmonious ways than is possible with the current Israeli settlers living in Hebron. His grandfather’s business partner was Jewish and they would take turns on Friday and Saturday looking after their shop. He remembers that his own family used to light candles on Friday evenings. He continues to maintain contact with descendants of the Bajaio family and has an extensive network of Jewish friends in Israel and abroad.

When one of the CPTers interviewing Abu Haikel said he had noticed some frightened looking construction workers in the van when he was walking up to visit, Abu Haikel told him they were Palestinian. When asked how he felt about their collaboration with the settlement enterprise, Hani Abu Haikel said it was a matter “for their conscience,” and that he would just as soon the work go to a Palestinian worker as someone from Thailand.

As the conversation turned once again to relationships between Christians, Jews and Muslims, Hani noted, “When we look at the Holy Qur’an, the Torah and the Bible, the common thread is about respecting your neighbor, loving God and doing justice.”

“Soldiers come here with fear in their eyes,” he said, “They are told by their commanders that the women carry knives and the men carry guns.” Abu Haikel found this information out when he asked a soldier, “Why are you frightened of me?” Afterwards, they had a three-hour conversation. The soldier was reassigned to another checkpoint the day after and they did not speak again.
Under international law, it is illegal for Israel to move populations into military-occupied territory. The Israeli government therefore does not have the right to terminate the Abu Haikel’s rental agreement, to destroy their trees, or to offer the land to Israeli settlers.

People wishing to follow developments on the Tel Rumeida situation should check out the Save Tel Rumeida Facebook page, run by the families who live there and their supporters, Christian Peacemaker Teams Palestine will also continue to post updates on its Facebook page.

3 Videos in Which Simon Cobbs Makes A Fool of Himself

Simon Cobbs of Sussex Friends of Israel - a common and garden thug who poses as an intellectual 

The Israeli who is concerned about Assad killing Syrian children (presumably only  Israel has a monopoly on killing) who  knows full well that the West militarised a popular struggle against Assad, is the director of a security company at Gatwick.

His name was taken by the Police today after repeated comments about his behaviour.


Biblical Rights and the theft of land

Biblical Rights and a new Conservatory


Don’t be anti-Semitic.

In a spoof with a political purpose, political activists visit premises near the Israeli Embassy to say that a new conservatory is being built and that Biblical Rights mean that they must make way for the Embassy of Land Theft.

This is, of course the excuse for land theft in the Occupied Territories of Palestine.

Those who object are, of course, 'anti-semitic'!

Tony Greenstein



A New Break for Freedom by the US's Hillel

Hillel students increasingly reject the Zionist Thought Police in favour of Free Speech

The attempt by national Hillel to keep Jewish students in the fold, i.e. Zionists are increasingly breaking down as Jewish students can see when an attempt is being made to censor them.  I recently posted an article on Swarthmore Hillel.  Here Zionist police state activists even barred Avraham Burg, a liberal ex-speaker of the Knesset, who has found the racism of Israel and Zionism increasingly unpalatable.

Below is an article from the New York Times  on the wider rejection of Zionism’s thought police (‘you can’t criticise us from the Diaspora, we demand your unquestioning loyalty’).
 

Swarthmore’s Hillel group decided not to abide by guidelines prohibiting collaboration with speakers or groups deemed unsupportive of Israel.
Tony Greenstein

Members of Jewish Student Group Test Permissible Discussion on Israel

J

By LAURIE GOODSTEIN New York Times December 28, 2013

At Harvard, the Jewish student group Hillel was barred from co-sponsoring a discussion with a Palestinian student group. At Binghamton University, a Hillel student leader was forced to resign his position after showing a film about Palestinians and inviting the filmmaker’s brother to speak. And on many other campuses, Hillel chapters have been instructed to reject collaboration with left-leaning Jewish groups.
Hillel's birthright campaign (which tries to persuade students that Israel is their birthright) is increasingly failing.   The USA is our home not Israel.
At American colleges, few values are as sacred as open debate and few issues as contested as the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. But Hillel, whose core mission is to keep the next generation of Jews in the fold, says that under its auspices one thing is not open to debate: Those who reject or repudiate Israel have no place.

This month, the students at the Swarthmore Hillel rebelled, declaring themselves the first “Open Hillel” in the nation. They will not abide by Hillel guidelines that prohibit chapters from collaborating with speakers or groups that “delegitimize” or “apply a double standard” to Israel.
The Hillel dispute has amplified an increasingly bitter intra-Jewish debate over what is permissible discussion and activism about Israel on college campuses.

In a major step affecting that dispute, professors in the 5,000-member American Studies Association voted this month to boycott Israeli academic institutions over Israel’s treatment of the Palestinians.
Hillel’s defenders say that in an atmosphere so hostile to Israel, Jewish campus organizations must draw parameters and that this is why Hillel established new guidelines in 2010.

Alan M. Dershowitz, a professor at Harvard Law School who was once a faculty adviser for the Harvard Hillel, said in an interview: “I don’t think this is a free-speech issue. The people who want divestment and boycotts have plenty of opportunity to speak on campus. The question is a branding one. You can see why Hillel does not want its brand to be diluted.”

In interviews, some students said that college should be a place for no-holds-barred discussions about Israel and that Hillel should host those discussions, since Hillel emphasizes inclusion and takes its name from a rabbinical sage who welcomed intellectual challenge.

“Hillel does a fantastic job of bringing together Orthodox, Conservative, Reform, secular students, and respecting everyone’s different religious practice,” said Rachel Sandalow-Ash, a student active in the Hillel at Harvard. “But in the political realm, that sort of pluralism just doesn’t exist, and students who have more dissident views on Israel are excluded in many ways.”

Joshua Wolfsun, a student on the Swarthmore Hillel board, said, “There are a lot of really smart people across the political spectrum on Israel that we want to talk to, and we feel that Hillel should not have a political litmus test on who is allowed and who is not.”

In a manifesto, the Swarthmore Hillel students proclaimed: “All are welcome to walk through our doors and speak with our name and under our roof, be they Zionist, anti-Zionist, post-Zionist, or non-Zionist.”

But the president and chief executive of Hillel, Eric D. Fingerhut, responded to them in a letter saying that “ ‘anti-Zionists’ will not be permitted to speak using the Hillel name or under the Hillel roof, under any circumstances.”

The organization’s guidelines specify that it will not host or work with speakers or groups that deny the right of Israel to exist; “delegitimize, demonize or apply a double standard to Israel”; support boycotts, divestment or sanctions against Israel; or “foster an atmosphere of incivility.”

A nationwide online petition in support of the Swarthmore Hillel’s rejection of those guidelines has gathered 1,200 signatures.

In an interview, Mr. Fingerhut said, “If we’re an organization that is committed to building Jewish identity and lifelong connections to the Jewish world and to Israel, then we certainly have to draw lines.”

But some students active in Hillel say the lines are either muddy or wrong. Hillel’s adult staff members on more than a dozen campuses have refused to allow J Street U, an affiliate of the liberal group J Street, to co-sponsor events. The explanation was that donors to Hillel do not support J Street, which supports a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict but is critical of Israeli settlement building and the occupation of the West Bank.

J Street is challenging the dominance of the more conservative establishment Israel lobby, the American Israel Public Affairs Committee. Leaders of Hillel and Aipac recently published an essay in The New York Jewish Week hailing their partnership on campuses.

David Eden, a spokesman at Hillel, said that each of the 550 campus Hillel branches worldwide was independently funded. “But as far as Hillel international is concerned,” he said, “J Street and J Street U and other groups are more than welcome.” 

In contrast, the leaders of Jewish Voice for Peace, a group that supports the boycott and divestment movement, say their organization has been unable to affiliate or work with any campus Hillel in the United States.

Hillel chapters have also shunned collaborations with Palestinian student groups, which tend to support boycott and divestment.

That is what happened at Harvard. Hillel held a dinner with about 15 students for Avraham Burg, a leftist former speaker of the Israeli Parliament. The students then walked over to the Quincy House dormitory for Mr. Burg’s speech — Hillel refused to host the speech because it was co-sponsored by the Palestine Solidarity Committee.

Showing documentary films about the Palestinian experience has also caused friction on many campuses. In one case, Benjamin Sheridan, a senior at Binghamton University, part of the State University of New York, said he arranged a showing last year of the Academy Award-nominated film “5 Broken Cameras” and a talk by the filmmaker’s brother, a Palestinian angry about the occupation of the West Bank and East Jerusalem. The event was sponsored by Dorm Room Diplomacy, a student group that holds video conferences between American and foreign students.

Mr. Sheridan said he was forced to resign from the board of Bearcats for Israel, a Hillel affiliate, and from a paid internship promoting study abroad programs in Israel. He said the Hillel director told him he could no longer hold these positions because he had broken the guidelines and put donations to Hillel at risk. (Mr. Eden, the spokesman for Hillel, disputed this, saying fellow students forced Mr. Sheridan out.)

Mr. Sheridan, 21, wears a wristband that says “Israel Is Strong” in Hebrew. He spent his gap year in Israel, has an Israeli flag in his dorm room and did an internship at the American Jewish Committee.
“The second I question Israel — Israeli policies, not its existence — all of a sudden I’m a pariah?” he asked. “If Hillel is going to be the group that represents all Jews, how can it say, ‘On Israel we have one policy only’?”

Tony Greenstein's 60th Birthday Party



60 Years of Fighting Oppression

Together with my longstanding comrade from the Trades Council and Socialist Party, Bill North, I celebrated my 60th Birthday Party at the end of last year and Bill  his 61st.

Below are the lyrics to a birthday song written by Deborah Maccoby and arranged and performed at the party by Deborah Fink:










THE BALLAD OF TONY GREENSTEIN
1ST VERSE
Tony Greenstein is a leftie
And one of Marx's lads;
He's fought the fascists all his life,
Those counter-revolutionary cads.
CHORUS
Those counter-revolutionary cads,
Those counter-revolutionary cads,
He's fought the fascists all his life,
Those counter-revolutionary cads.
2ND VERSE
His father was a rabbi
Who wanted him to be
A pillar of the Liverpool
Jewish community.
CHORUS
Jewish community,
Jewish community,
A pillar of the Liverpool
Jewish community.
3RD VERSE
But little Tony said:
"This plan I will resist;,
I'm an atheist, a Marxist
And an anti-Zionist."
CHORUS
An anti-Zionist,
An anti-Zionist.
He's an atheist, a Marxist
And an anti-Zionist.
4TH VERSE
With the fervour of his father
Towards the Jewish law,
Young Tony went to demonstrate
Against the Springboks' tour.
CHORUS
Against the Springboks' tour,
Against the Springboks' tour,
Young Tony went to demonstrate
Against the Springboks' tour.
5TH VERSE
But it wasn't only fascists
And fans of apartheid;
The British left found Tony
A thorn within their side.
CHORUS
A thorn within their side,
A thorn within their side;
The British left found Tony
A thorn within their side.
6TH VERSE
The exiled Palestinians
The left did not discern,
So Tony helped to edit
The magazine "Return".
CHORUS
The magazine "Return",
The magazine "Return",
So Tony helped to edit
The magazine "Return".
7TH VERSE
When the left regarded Israel
As a socialist country,
Young Tony with a few comrades
Co-founded PSC.
CHORUS
Co-founded PSC,
Co-founded PSC.
Young Tony and a few comrades
Co-founded PSC.
8TH VERSE
When PSC supported
The process called Oslo,
Then Tony and a few comrades
Said it was time to go.
CHORUS
Yes, it was time to go,
Yes, it was time to go,
Then Tony and a few comrades
Said it was time to go.
9TH VERSE
But later he rejoined it,
When he had been proved right;
Against the anti-Semites
He set himself to fight.
CHORUS
He set himself to fight,
He set himself to fight,
Against the anti-Semites
He set himself to fight.
10TH VERSE
Against those anti-Semites
He spoke out clear and strong;
They crawled back in the woodwork
Where all of them belong.
CHORUS
Where all of them belong,
Where all of them belong,
They crawled back in the woodwork
Where all of them belong.
11TH VERSE
For JfJfP
He didn't care a fig;
He called for total BDS
And signed up to J-BIG
CHORUS
And signed up to J-BIG,
And signed up to J-BIG;
He called for total BDS
And signed up to J-BIG
12TH VERSE
So - three cheers for Tony Greenstein!
He's sixty on this day;
May he win all his battles,
The first among the fray!
CHORUS
The first among the fray,
The first among the fray,
May he win all his battles,
The first among the fray!
-----------------
The song is to the tune of Harry Pollitt by The Limeliters.

As comrades will know I'm seriously ill, so there may not be many more birthdays to celebrate.  But we are all living in specks of time and the question is how we have campaigned to make the world a better place.  Apart from close personal friends, there were comrades from the Jewish non-Zionist and anti-Zionist left, Brighton  & Hove Trades Council, assorted socialists and anti-fascists and members Brighton & Hove Palestine Solidarity Campaign.  As well as my beloved 4 children - Daniel, Ellie, Tom and James and my wife, Fiona.

There was even a comrade, Helen, who I hadn't seen for over 25 years, who was one of the founders  of the Palestine society at Sussex.

I've always believed in giving your children a choice and not trying to dominate their ideas, unlike my own Orthodox Rabbi Father.  I think it has proved successful as, despite some of my wife's views they are firmly of the left.

Tony Greenstein

18 January 2014

The BBC has become little more than the mouth piece of the ruling elites.

Don't Ever Pay these Thieves and Liars Your License Fee

 Posted: 08 Jan 2014 05:30 PM PST
This article first appeared on the excellent Outrage Site



The reality is that the BBC has always been a spokesman of the ruling class.  In the 1950's and 1960's it banned the War Game about the reality of nuclear war and its Irish and anti-colonial coverage was equally bad.
Theodor Herzl - didn't care about Dreyfuss and believed that anti-Semitism was good for the Jews
My most recent experience of the BBC is Simon Schama's appalling History of the Jews.  It was nothing of the kind, it was a History of Zionism.  I complained to the BBC and its gone to the BBC Trust, filled with establishment types.  It portrayed the Dreyfuss Affair, a pivotal area in fighting anti-semitism, which Zionism says is impossible though Theodore Herzl's eyes.  But Herzl had nothing to do with the Affair, the only Zionist who did,  Bernard Lazarre, resigned from the Zionist Actions Committee and Herzl didn't even mention  it in his booklet  The Jewish State published nearly two years late in 1896.  In this 4 volume Diaries has mentioned it cursorily

Instead I pointed out that Herzl sought and got, a friendly review of his pamphlet from Edouard Drumont, author of the Eternal Jew, which on its first print run sold a 100,000 copies.  Although Drumont was a dedicated anti-Semite he was also a devout Zionist.  Schama's only response to this was that it came from the 'unsavoury' part of the anti-Zionist movement until I provided chapter and verse for him.  Like most ruling class and especially Zionist historians, they know very little, though even most Zionist historians consider the tale of  Herzl's Zionism starting with the Dreyfuss Affair a myth.  Not so the BBC which stood by this most reactionary of Zionist story tellers.

The BBC has a history of saying nothing when Gaza is under siege, but the moment a rocket is fired they spring into action.  Israeli deaths merit attention, Palestinian lives are cheap.  So it was  till the end days of Apartheid.  During the period up to the early '70s the BBC was happy to broadcasat sporting events from South Africa.

In an article 'BBC admits pandering to Israeli propaganda' byAmena Saleem of The Electronic Intifada (London 14 December 2012)

Amena Saleem cites the Israeli justification for not mentioning Israeli attacks on Gaza, an unarmed enclave, unless it is in the context of Israel's defence:

'In an email sent on 21 November to a member of the UK-based Palestine Solidarity Campaign, and seen by this writer, the BBC Complaints Department explains in some detail how the broadcaster had gone out of its way to lay the blame for the violence of the previous eight days on the Palestinians.

The email, signed off “BBC Complaints,” states: “Since the news of Israeli air strikes in Gaza our coverage has pointed out on numerous occasions that the attacks are in response to recent rocket attacks on Israel from the Gaza Strip.”

It adds: “Our initial online report on 14 November pointed to how the attack on Ahmed Said Khalil al-Jabari and another Hamas official ‘follows a wave of rocket attacks against Israel from the territory’ and how ‘the United States said it supported Israel’s right to self-defense, and condemned militant rocket attacks on southern Israel.’”

Seemingly oblivious to or unfazed by the inaccuracy of its own reporting, the message goes on: “On the BBC’s News at Ten that same evening, the BBC’s Gaza and West Bank correspondent Jon Donnison’s report explained that ‘Israel says the strike followed a wave of rocket attacks from inside Gaza,’ before hearing directly from Israeli Army Spokeswoman Lt. Col. Avital Leibovich as she explained how ‘I can just elaborate that the target of the operation is to protect Israeli civilians. The same lives of Israelis that have been under constant rocket attack for the past year.’”

In a twist of almost comic absurdity, given eight days of reporting which squarely blamed Hamas for the violence and equated the fear caused by the 12-pound and 90-pound Palestinian rockets with the terror induced by Israel’s 500-pound to 2,000-pound bombs, the email ends with: “We will continue to report on developments from the region in a fair, accurate and impartial way.”

Official line

All BBC journalists stuck to Israel’s official line that the assassination of 14 November, and what followed, was in retaliation to Palestinian rockets — and conveniently omitted from their reports the fact that Israel had been engaged in killing Palestinian children in the days immediately preceding al-Jabari’s execution.

Israel’s 10 November 2012 killing of 18-year-old Ahmad Dardasawi was not deemed newsworthy by the BBC.
(Ashraf Amra / APA images)
 The Palestine Solidarity Campaign wrote to the BBC’s flagship news and current affairs program Today on 12 November to ask why it had not covered the killing of the five Palestinian teenagers on 8 and 10 November.

The program’s assistant editor, Dominic Groves, wrote back to say: “Even in the space of a three hour program it is not always possible to cover every development in a story — especially one as long running and complex as the one in the Middle East.”

Time was the excuse I was given when the BBC couldn't defend Schama's lies.

And yet the killing of five young boys by Israel isn’t a “development in a story;” it is news in itself. When the Today program can give prominent coverage to a Palestinian rocket attack on a bus in April 2011, which killed a 16-year-old Israeli schoolboy, how can Groves claim the same program has no room to report on the slaughter of five Palestinian boys by the Israeli army? (“Israeli boy Daniel Viflic dies after rocket hits bus,” 18 April 2011).

The Miners' Strikes
Police Mobs at Orgreave
Yet  none of this should be a surprise. At the time of the General Strike it supported  the Government and Lord Reith, its Director-General, refused to broadcast a peaceful message from the Archbishop of Canterbury.

In the 1984-5 strike it dealt with Police violence at Orgreave, where all the police cases of 'assault' were thrown out, by the simple method of reversing the video of  Police attacking Miners and Minters defending themselves.  What was broadcast appeared to be the Miners attacking the Police and the Police responding.  The corrupt South  Yorkshire Police that the BBC had said nothing about.
 

Nelson Mandela

Mandela whose death the BBC did much to trivialise

One of the most significant events of 2013 was the memorial for Nelson Mandela, marred by the bogus interpreter, who made random movements while standing alongside those paying tribute.

Whilst BBC covered Mandela's death and the aftermath extensively - as we would hope for one of the great figures of the 20th Century. It also took delight in reporting on fake signer Thamsanqa Jantjie.
The more the BBC spoke about the bogus signer though - at the detriment of other news - the more irritating it became. Not because it was frivolous - we are used to the BBC being self-indulgent and frivolous - but because over recent years the broadcaster has become more and more like Thamsanqa Jantjie.

My view is that the BBC is simply not transmitting an accurate account of reality. Over the space of the year it has ignored significant news and spun events to present something quite different from what those involved witnessed.

Ignoring, muting or giving a distorted representation of news would be a serious accusation for any broadcaster in the UK, as news programmes are obliged to be balanced. For the BBC, however, it is an even more serious matter.

One of the key reasons that the BBC is such a tarnished brand is that it harboured one of the most prolific paedophiles in the world. The tarnishing was exacerbated by its flagship news programme Newsnight spiking an exposé of Savile, who was instead featured in two nauseating tributes during prime time Christmas slots in 2011.

After the Newsnight spike came to light, in 2012, the BBC was on the back foot and it was completely on its arse later that year after Newsnight broadcasted an 'investigative journalism' piece accusing an unnamed Tory of abusing children. Jigsaw identification, made easy by Twitter, revealed the figure to be Lord McAlpine, who turned out to be the wrong man but did prove to be promiscuously litigious.

Many of us who grew up with Newsnight being as vibrant as The Day Today - which was inspired by Paxman's abrasive approach - have been concerned about how timid the programme has become since the Savile spike and the McAlpine McScrewup. I would go so far as to compare it to a whining, castrated dog licking its groin and rather more interested in its wounds than the world around it.

Some have linked BBC news' ongoing timidity to Tory grandee Chris Patten being helicoptered in as chair of the BBC Trust. Such is its apparent reluctance to question domestic political decisions that it does sometimes seem that the broadcaster has become a public-funded PR agency for a failing government.

This view was reinforced in 2013 when Tory Party chairman Grant Shapps / Michael Green / Sebastian Fox suggested that the BBC would lose income if it doesn't free itself from bias. The most bizarre thing about that statement was not that Grant Shapps has at least three identities but the suggestion that the BBC has a left wing bias. If the BBC is currently left wing my name is Corinne Stockheath.

Margaret Thatcher and her husband Dennis both characterised BBC journalists as "pinkos" but they can rest assured that this is far from the case these days. If it were still the case then student protests, in which young people were beaten by the police, might have been broadcasted rather than eventually posted online with the focus shifted to a wheelie bin fire.

A diligent broadcaster would have also put such protests in context by examining how student dissent is being stamped down and politically aware students are being spied on by the police. The BBC did not.

If the BBC is "pinko" or even neutral we might have expected it to broadcast a confrontational interview with Grant Shapps about the allegation that fraud may have been committed within one of his business ventures. Channel 4 News revealed that although the police have dropped an investigation into past business affairs of Shapps, lawyers who advised the police say some of his company's activities may have amounted to "an offence of fraud".

If the BBC was a neutral broadcaster working on behalf of the public that funds it - let alone "pinko," we might have expected it to broadcast the mass protest about hospital cuts and the sell-off of the NHS, brokered by a political party that hasn't won an election for 22 years. BBC journalists were at the Tory Party Conference, outside which the demonstration took place, but throughout the day neglected the 50,000 marchers.

Throughout 2013 we have had very little debate on BBC news programmes about the relentless asset stripping of the NHS and a much greater focus on individual examples of poor practice. The BBC's coverage of the NHS in 2013 reminded me of a spoilt child trying to get its more virtuous sibling into trouble to get itself out of trouble. Helping to undermine the NHS in the hope of saving its own skin, frankly, is sickening and will not be forgotten by the public.

Police mobs at Orgreave  - the BBC hid behind the Police
The BBC will not redeem itself in the eyes of the public by towing the party line on policies the government wants to push and citizens oppose. The only way the BBC can redeem itself for Savile and the McAlpine fiasco is to produce accurate, balanced news for those people who pay them. That is not the Tory Party. It is not Grant Shapps. It is not Sebastian Fox. It is the British public. To ignore and distort news to appease a government is as outrageous as the BBC hiding news about Savile to protect itself.

By Will Black, who writes for the Huffington Post and has a background in anthropology and mental health care

Boycott G4S and the Privatised Prison Industrial Complex

The Profits of War & Repression - G4S - Accessories to Murder and Torture

 Video: Angela Davis, Gina Dent On Palestine, G4S and the Prison Industrial Complex

19 December 2013

Below is a video  from our latest event, ‘On Palestine, G4S and the Prison Industrial Complex’ with eminent feminist scholar-activists Angela Davis and Gina Dent.



In 2007, the British security company G4S signed a contract with the Israeli Prison Authority to provide security systems and other services for major Israeli prisons, which hold Palestinian political prisoners.

G4S also provides equipment and services to Israeli checkpoints in the West Bank that form part of the route of Israel’s illegal Wall and to the terminals isolating the occupied and besieged territory of Gaza.

After watching the video please do share this email with your friends and help us expose G4S's complicity in Israel's illegal occupation of Palestine.
All the best,

Rafeef Ziadah
Senior Campaigner for Global Justice

P.S. Please take action to end G4S complicity in Israel’s prison system and illegal occupation  
19 December 2013

War on Want, the School of Law at SOAS and the Russell Tribunal on Palestine were honoured to host Angela Davis  and Gina Dent  for a discussion on Justice for Palestine and the Stop G4S campaign   on 13 December 2013.

It was a unique opportunity to hear eminent feminist scholar-activists Angela Davis and Gina Dent discussing Palestine and the struggle for liberty in a world of growing militarisation, privatised repression and the proliferation of prisons.

Below are videos from the event – please do share them widely and help us build our campaign to hold British security company G4S to account. /campaigns/justice-for-palestine/end-g4s-complicity-in-israels-prisons

Angela Davis



 

Gina Dent