‘This is not a political trial it is a criminal trial’ – so sing Judge and Prosecution in harmony
I promised in my last blog to provide an update on the trial at Wolverhampton Crown Court in which I’m charged, together with 5 others, with having in my possession ‘articles with intent to destroy or damage’ property belonging to Elbit.
Overwhelmed as I am by messages of support (see comments) the supporters of Ben Gvir, Smotrich and Israel's genocidalists are crossing their fingers in the hope I will be locked up!
I was
informed by my barrister, Danielle Manson from Garden Court Chambers that the
reason why I am the lead defendant is because of my blog
of two years ago! A rare honour indeed. No
doubt I shall be cross-examined on every word and past participle.
There is
one theme that Judge Chambers and Prosecutor Deborah Gould are agreed on and
that is that this trial has nothing to do with politics. It’s only about criminal conduct and criminal
damage in particular.
If Chambers
and Gould are to be believed, then 6 people, most of whom did not even know
each other beforehand, conspired to engage in a spot of vandalism on the
morning of March 9th for no other reason than that they felt in a
destructive mood. Quite why we didn’t focus on breaking a few windows nearer
home or vandalizing a phone box is one of life’s mysteries.
Six members of the German Jewish Resistance Group in Nazi Germany Who in May 1942 set fire to Goebbel's Soviet Paradise Exhibition in Berlin's Lustgarten. They had broken the law and were beheaded. According to Judge and Prosecutor in the trial, adherence to the law is a supreme value
There is
therefore a deliberate attempt to exclude or play down the real reasons for
what happened, i.e. the role of Elbit in manufacturing drones such as Hermes
450 which has been responsible for the death of thousands of Palestinian civilians,
to say nothing of its supply of drones to the Indian army for use in Kashmir
and its supply of weaponry to the genocidal junta in Burma.
Herbert Baum - executed leader of the German Jewish anti-Nazi Baum Group - died under torture
Jo
Wadsworth, the Blairite co-editor of the Brighton & Hove News published
an article on the case today. No doubt she and the Editor of the Jewish
Chronicle are salivating at the prospect of me being convicted!
Today the
jury was whittled down from 18 to 12. It was thus only on the afternoon of the
fourth day of trial that the Prosecution opened its case with lurid tales of
conspiracies and plots. Factually she was all at sea despite copious amounts of
information supplied by mobile phone companies on our whereabouts on the night
of March 8/morning of March 9.
Thus I was supposed to have left Brighton
at 5.30 when I picked up the van and arrived by 9.30. In fact I didn’t leave Brighton
until about 7.30 and didn’t arrive until after midnight. Just a small point but
it shows the sloppiness of the Prosecution despite the massive powers of search
they have under the Regulation of
Investigatory Powers Act 2000.
Demonstration March 29th outside Shenstone's factory in Walsall
Thus
tomorrow (Friday) the trial begins proper as the Prosecution opens its case.
However as Judge Chambers has other business, sentencing a rapist and murderer
in the afternoon, there will only be a short session from 10.00-12.00.
Thus ends
the first week. The second week will consist of only 3 days because of Easter
and the third week will be four days because of Easter Monday so this trial is
likely to continue into the third week of April.
However
this also gives people time to mobilize around the issues in the case, which is
the right to take action against those who deliberately flout international
human rights law in search of profit. Britain is signed up to the UN and European
Human Rights Conventions but they are observed in the breach and a blind eye is
turned to arms exports by Britain.
In June
2019 the Court of Appeal held
that the government’s export of arms to Saudia Arabia to be unlawful. Foreign
Secretary Liz Truss blithely ignored
the ruling and proceeded regardless. It was all a ‘mistake’ she said. Not a defence I suspect we will be able to
use.
Tony Greenstein
This blog
has been legally vetted and there are a number of things I have been forced to
omit for legal reasons which will become clear later
Good luck Tony .. Hooefully everyone will spread news of this trial far and wide
ReplyDeleteGood luck comrade we are with you!
ReplyDeleteTony, you are true hero of the oppressed -speaking up for those without a voice. I hope the jury listen to you and empathise with your words.
ReplyDeleteI hope so too!
DeleteWhen the British government refuses to do anything about companies in Britain who are manufacturing lethal weapons here and which it knows are being used to kill and oppress innocent people, who is left to try and stop this evil trade? It is left to ordinary citizens who care enough about their fellow human beings, as I'm sure members of the jury do, to shame and spotlight companies who, at the end of the day, are complicit in the murder of people for profit. Not only are they complicit, they boast about it in their sales literature.
DeleteTony I'd like to attend your trial for this act of abetting violence against random buildings. Do you think it will be on next Friday April 7th or is that when they'll be off to celebrate the incontrovertible fact that Christ rose from the dead?
ReplyDeleteNo next Friday is Easter Friday and I shall be back in Brighton. However the trial will continue the following Tuesday
DeleteGood luck, right is on your side
DeleteGood luck!
ReplyDeleteMassive respect to you, 'Palestine Action' and all concerned.
ReplyDeleteDue to personal reasons my own faith in the 'judicial system' has been shaken severely. This attempt to downplay the politics of any actions against Elbit really is the nail in the coffin of any of that faith left over.
ReplyDeleteGood luck!
May justice prevail Tony. Bill MacKeith
ReplyDeleteStanding with you from liverpool.
ReplyDeleteSolidarity, Tony. Good luck 🤞
ReplyDeleteSo, let me get this straight... The jury has to decide which of these is a crime, and which is a nice respectable endeavor:
ReplyDelete[A] Making machines to facilitate mass murder;
or...
[B] Trying to prevent murder (see "A", above).
But apparently there are "two sides" to this deserving equal consideration, and the jury will be told to ponder the relative arguments.
Thanks for courageously putting up this post in such ominous circumstances. I guess it was inevitable that if they could find a quisling judge to do for Julian Assange with such a blatant disregard for justice, they would eventually get around to applying the same techniques against Palestine Action activists. And who better to use the treatment on than Tony Greenstein, who ain't going to back away from injustice no matter what? So much for democracy and human rights in the UK.
ReplyDeleteBon courage, Tony. I wish you victory over this tyranny.
"When change threatens to rule, then the rules are changed." - Michael Parenti
thanks Richard, Tom and everyone else. The only person who hasn't wished me good luck is, surprise surprise my old 'friend' Jonathan Hoffman, the man who was convicted of threatening and harassing women protestors
ReplyDeleteTony, the Jury can be your friends, appeal to them directly, as in my earlier comment
ReplyDeleteI agree but they have to be won over and my problem is disunity amongst the defendants.
ReplyDeleteIf the defendants cannot talk to each other for whatever reason, their legal representatives should do it and create some solidarity, it's in all their interests. 'Every man for himself' won't cut it.
DeleteTony, you are a man of integrity and great courage and l wish you well and a just and successful result. Solidarity comrade! 💚
ReplyDeletethanks Paddy
DeleteThe judge has made it clear that he will not hear evidence about the motives of the defendants for taking the actions that they are accused of nor, by implication, about the activities of Elbit. That is what they are ruling out by saying it is a criminal trial, not a political trial. See recent Just Stop oil trial and contempt convictions. Jury will not even hear the argument about preventing a greater wrong.
ReplyDeleteThese restrictions by courts on the options open to the defence in a criminal trial are reminiscent of soviet show trials and should surely be open to appeal for restricting the rights of the accused to fairly defend themselves.
DeleteAs far as I understand it, the judge's directions as to what can and cannot be heard apply to the defendant's legal representatives. However, if a defendant defends himself, he can speak directly to the jury. Therefore, is this a time when it may not be adviseable to have a legal represetative in court?
Delete