UNISON
HAS QUESTIONS TO ANSWER – why did
unelected officials refuse to
defend the right of workers to freedom of speech?
Cast your mind back to
March 26th 2018. The Board of Deputies of British Jews held a demonstration against ‘anti-Semitism’
in Parliament Square. Its target was Jeremy Corbyn. We were in the middle of
the local election campaign and Luciana Berger, who was a Labour MP before
decamping to the Independent Group, had just discovered a 7 year old ‘anti-Semitic’
to beat Jeremy Corbyn over the head with.
The Board of Deputies at the time of Oswald Moseley urged Jew to do nothing about fascism |
Never before in its history had the Board
of Deputies held an anti-racist demonstration. Not during the 1930’s in the
battle against Oswald Moseley’s British Union
of Fascists. Not during the 1970’s
in the fight against the National Front or in succeeding decades against the
BNP and EDL. But when Israel was on the agenda they moved into action.
Steve Terry - right-wing Progress Labour councillor and UNISON's London Regional Organiser faced a conflict of interest and resolved it in his favour |
Indeed on October 2nd
1936 the Board specifically issued warnings in the Jewish Chronicle telling Jews
to stay away from the BUF march in what became known
as the Battle of Cable Street.
Letter from Steve Terry advising Stan to apologise and 'plead mitigating circumstances' |
‘Anti-Semitism’ had only, it would seem reared
its head under Jeremy Corbyn, the left-wing leader of the Labour Party. The
fact that he is also a supporter of the Palestinians is entirely coincidental!
The Zionists' Racist Demonstration that Momentum Ignored |
But on March 26th
2018, the Board and the Zionists girded their loins and organised a demonstration.
Indeed not only the Board but those well known anti-racists Ian Paisley of the
DUP, Norman Tebbit, Sajid David and even Chuka Ummuna attended. It was the strangest ‘anti-racist
demonstration ever seen as it seemed to be composed mainly of racists.
The late David Cesarani was a Zionist historian confirming Nazi support for the German Zionists, who represented about 3% of the Jewish community |
There was also a
counter-demonstration to the Zionists organised by Jewish Voice for Labour and
supported by Labour Against the Witchhunt.
At the counter demonstration LAW Secretary Stan Keable got into a
discussion with a Zionist demonstrator, during the course of which Stan
expressed his view that the Zionists had collaborated before the war with the Nazis.
David Grossman, BBC2 journalist - the ethics of a demented skunk - note how allegations of collaboration have become 'plotting with Hitler' and how the Holocaust isn't antisemitic |
The evidence for this
point of view is extensive. However a BBC2 Newsnight ‘journalist’ David
Grossman secretly filmed the exchange, posting it on social media. Immediately came a demand by a junior government
minister and Tory MP Greg Hands, for Hammersmith Council
to dismiss Stan for having the temerity to express his opinions.
Instead of Council leader
Steve Cowan telling Hands to get
on his bike, this New Labour apparatchik immediately had Stan suspended.
You might think that this
was a slam dunk for Stan’s union, UNISON. Stan approached their London Regional
Organiser, Steve Terry, to help him fight the case. Little did Stan know that
Terry was a right-wing councillor in Walthamstow and a supporter of Progress.
Instead of supporting Stan he told him to plead guilty and plead mitigation!
I spoke, briefly to Terry
on the phone and pointed out that the suspension was a breach of Articles 10
and 11 of the European Convention on Human Rights (Freedom of Assembly and
Freedom of Speech) however he was too arrogant to take advice.
Unfortunately it's not true |
I therefore represented
Stan at his disciplinary hearing and on May 21st he was dismissed. An
appeal was made and London UNISON successfully prevented me representing Stan thereon although the Secretary of the local branch represented him. The appeal nonetheless failed.
It is therefore
gratifying to learn that nearly a year later, the Central London Employment Tribunal
has upheld the claim of Stan Keable for unfair dismissal, both procedural and
substantive. The judgement has not yet been put online but it took 2 hours to
read out.
UNISON’s failure to
defend the right to free speech of its members is shameful and shocking. There is
no excuse for the behaviour of Stephen Terry nor that of his superiors such as
Beth Bickerstaffe who upheld the decision of Terry not to give Stan any
support.
Why has this
happened? Undoubtedly it is a product of
UNISON having adopted the IHRA definition of anti-Semitism which effectively
outlaws criticism of Zionism. It is a definition which effectively renders
UNISON’s policy of BDS and support for the Palestinians as ‘anti-Semitic’. It means that criticism of Zionism, the ideology and movement behind the establishment of the Apartheid State of Israel is also 'antisemitic' based as it is on the assumption that all Jews are therefore Zionists.
Linda Perks, who broke UNISON's election rules, was effectively promoted for what she had done |
Prentis went out of his way to support Adam Langleben of the Jewish Labour Movement who like a rat left Labour for the TIGs. He is now marshalling the case against Labour before the EHRC |
Dave Prentis after last
year’s elections, went out of his way to extend his sympathy to a Jewish Labour
Movement Councillor and Officer, Adam Langleben who, as a result of the false anti-Semitism
campaign, managed to lose his own seat in Hendon West. Langleben is a scab who subsequently jumped
ship entirely and joined Chuka Ummuna’s Independent Group. Who knows where he
will now go given the split in the Funny Tinge!
The only person penalised
throughout all of this was me. On 8th
October, after a farcical and incompetent investigation carried by Regional
Officer Tony Jones I was summoned
to a disciplinary hearing conducted by 3 Prentis loyalists headed by Mark
Fischer. I was found guilty and
sentenced to the heaviest punishment bar expulsion – 3 years suspension with
loss of membership rights – for having dared to criticise Terry’s treacherous
behaviour. UNISON is run by full-time officials for full-time officials. Members are not supposed to criticise these
unelected, overpaid bureaucrats.
Terry himself though did
not make a complaint. It was his superior, Maggi Ferncombe, who had
previously been SE Regional Secretary. I have previously crossed swords with her. This meant that at the disciplinary hearing I was faced with the
somewhat difficult task of cross examining Ferncombe as to what was Terry’s
reactions were to my criticisms. For example did he feel intimidated and afraid as was alleged. In essence
I was cross examining on what was hearsay.
A somewhat difficult task.
Mark Fischer, as a
Prentis loyalist, refused to listen to any mention of the reasons why I had
criticised Terry publicly. To him they
were irrelevant. Nonetheless during the disciplinary hearing it emerged that I
hadn’t been given notes of the original investigation and other discrepancies. These were also disregarded.
Because I secretly taped
the meeting I was able to show how I had been hampered in my ability to put
forward a defence by the way that the complaint had been made.
However the twist is that
although I was required to appeal by November 1st last
year, the appeal hearing has still not been heard 7 months later. The original decision has effectively been abandoned. The reason is not hard to work out. How can someone make a complaint on behalf
of someone else when that person isn’t willing to complain themselves? The unfairness is clear even to such a died
in the wool bureaucrat as Beth Bickerstaffe (the daughter-in-law of previous
UNISON General Secretary Ron Bickerstaffe).
Tony Jones, a South-Eastern regional official who was my investigator - he is also a right-wing Labour councillor! |
So the net result is that
I am still a member of UNISON with full membership rights! However the original
injustice has not been remedied. Stan
was betrayed by UNISON’s full time officials.
They failed to do their job which is to defend the right of a member to
hold and express his opinions.
The charges against Stan from his employer were laughable:
1. That, in attending a counter
demonstration outside the Houses of Parliament on the 26th March 2018, you
knowingly increased the possibility of being challenged about your views and subsequently
proceeded to express views that were in breach of the Council’s Equality,
Diversity and Inclusion Policy and the Council’s Code of Conduct.
2. That you made inappropriate comments which were
subsequently circulated on social media which are deemed to be insensitive and
likely to be offensive and potentially in breach of the Equality Act 2010
and/or the Council’s Equality, Diversity and Inclusion Policy.
Terry could find nothing wrong in these
charges which were a direct challenge to an employee’s right to attend a demonstration
and a flagrant breach of Articles 10 and 11 of the European Convention of Human
Rights relating to freedom of assembly and freedom of speech. Any full-time
official who doesn’t understand that such a dismissal is almost certainly going
to be unfair and outside what is called the band of reasonable responses should
either be retrained or dismissed. It is clear that Terry's decision was taken on political grounds. Terry’s right-wing politics should not
be allowed to interfere with his work which is representing union members.
See:
Stan’s open
letter to H&F Councillors:
Mike Cushman
– ‘How
talking about Zionism can lose you your job’:
Tony
Greenstein – ‘No
criticism permitted’:
Labour Against the Witchhunt - Stan Keable has won his employment tribunal
Labour Against the Witchhunt - Stan Keable has won his employment tribunal
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please submit your comments below