27 December 2011

Xmas Day In Bethlehem


Pity Jesus if he was to attempt to make the journey from Nazareth to Bethlehem today! It is noticeable that despite the repression of Palestinian Christians, Christian leaders criticism of Israel has been muted to being non-existent

In the US Christians set up their own Christians United for Israel, which considers Palestinian Christians as some breed of Muslim, proving that religion always takes second place to politics.

Just as the Pope backed William of Orange and the Protestant Settlers at the Battle of the Boyne.

Tony Greenstein

Another Victory for BDS as Veolia Loses £485m Contract in West London









Another Blow to Veolia

Palestine Solidarity Campaign (UK)
PRESS Release: London,UK 23 December 2011

Veolia Takes Severe Blow As It Fails To Win
485 Million Pound Contract In West London

Human rights campaigners are celebrating after the West London Waste Authority ('WLWA') excluded French multinational Veolia from a £485 million contract covering 1.4 million inhabitants of the London boroughs of Brent, Ealing, Harrow, Hillingdon, Hounslow and Richmond-upon-Thames, for treatment of residual domestic waste.

The reasons behind the decision by the WLWA to exclude Veolia are commercially confidential but the impact of human rights campaigners should not be under-estimated.

Over the last six months campaigners lobbied Councillors and Council officials to exclude Veolia from the contract and submitted a letter to the WLWA - signed by nearly 600 local residents - documenting Veolia's direct complicity in grave breaches of international and humanitarian law in Jerusalem and the West Bank.

Campaigners pointed out that:

Veolia helped build and is involved in operating a tram-line which links Jerusalem with illegal Israeli settlements in the Palestinian West Bank.
Veolia takes waste from Israel and illegal Israeli Settlements and dumps this on Palestinian land at the Tovlan landfill.

The letter also gave evidence of Veolia's racist recruitment policies in Israel, as well as the company's operation of buses on Highway 443 which Palestinians are prohibited from using.

Veolia's failure to win the WLWA contract is a heavy blow for the company because it owns a domestic waste depot in the area covered by the WLWA and so should have been ideally placed to meet some of the necessary criteria for the WLWA tender.

Worse still for Veolia, this blow comes only six months after it failed to win Ealing Council's £300m new 'Clean and Green' contract even though Veolia already did much of the work under the old contract. When bidding for that contract Veolia had faced determined opposition from Palestinian rights campaigners over its track record in Jerusalem and the West Bank.

Campaigners across the world are focussed on Veolia because it is a key target of the global Boycott Divestment and Sanctions ('BDS') campaign for Palestinian rights and which is led by Palestinian civil society organisations.
Sarah Colborne, Director of the Palestine Solidarity Campaign in the UK , commented :

'Complicity in infringing human rights and international law has become an expensive business for Veolia. Other companies please note: There is a strong, determined and popular international campaign for justice for Palestinians; if you aid Israel's oppression of Palestinians your business will suffer just like Veolia's'.

Ends

Link for Press Release
Veolia Takes Severe Blow As It Fails To Win 485 Million Pound Contract In West London

“Veolia is paying a high price for its complicity in Israel’s occupation and violations of international law,” stated a press release from the UK-based Palestine Solidarity Campaign (PSC) on Wednesday, after the French urban systems corporation lost yet another contract this time in Ealing, London. The contract is worth £300 million ($490 million USD) in total over 15 years, and “is even more significant given the fact that Veolia had the previous parks maintenance contract,” PSC added.

The decision to bump Veolia from Ealing’s contract was made after British activists met with city councillors and council officials and provided details about Veolia’s ongoing complicity with the Israeli goverment’s light rail project in Jerusalem, which aims to connect West Jerusalem with illegal settlements in the occupied West Bank.

Several months ago, Veolia lost a major garbage collection contract elsewhere in London, and in March, PSC reported that a contract was awarded to an alternate company after sustained pressure on city officials by local BDS activists to cancel Veolia’s bid. Veolia also lost a contract in Richmond in February, Edinburgh in December 2010, and Sandwell in 2009.

PSC’s press release from 3 August reads in full:

In another victory for Palestinian rights, Ealing Council in London has failed to select Veolia for a comprehensive tender for its domestic refuse, street cleaning and parks maintenance contract. The contract is worth approx £300m in total over 15 years and one of Ealing Council’s largest single contracts. This is even more significant given the fact that Veolia had the previous parks maintenance contract.

Veolia remains involved in the building and future operation of a light-rail tramway linking Israel’s illegal settlements with West Jerusalem, facilitating Israel’s ‘grave breaches’ of the Fourth Geneva Convention. Veolia Transport Israel also runs two bus services serving the same function as the tramway: supporting and consolidating illegal settlements and tying them more closely into Israel.

Sarah Colborne, PSC Director, said: “Veolia’s loss of this contract, following its failure in a number of significant bids in Britain and internationally, is a clear sign that Veolia is paying a high price for its complicity in Israel’s occupation and violations of international law. West London PSC, together with other groups and individuals supporting Palestinian rights, wrote and met councillors from across the political spectrum and council officials, and submitted detailed factual and legal analysis. Veolia must realise that until it pulls out of all its activities serving Israel ’s illegal settlements, it will continue to be a target for the movement for boycott, divestment and sanctions (BDS). Through BDS, those committed to peace and justice are sending a message – we don’t buy into Israel’s violations of Palestinian rights.”

1. In April 2010 the UN Human Rights Council declared the tramway and its operation to be illegal (A/HRC/RES/13/7 of 14 April 2010). The resolution was passed 44 to 1, with the UK, France and all the EU members of the Council voting in favour. The operation of the tramway is precisely what Veolia has a contract to do.

2. Veolia is trying to sell its shares in the tramway. But the deal would involve Veolia Transport Israel in providing technical assistance in running the tramway for 5 years.

3. Through its subsidiary TMM, Veolia Transport Israel has also been operating the Tovlan landfill site in the occupied Jordan Valley for many years, supporting Israel’s illegal settlements in the West Bank by taking their refuse. There has also been a report of Tovlan receiving refuse from Israel itself, the occupier dumping its rubbish on the occupied. Veolia says that it is selling Tovlan to a local buyer and may have already done so, but far from ending Veolia’s complicity, the deal will compound it, for the intended sale is to Massu’a, the nearby illegal Israeli settlement. Moreover Veolia will continue its involvement by providing the settlement with advice concerning Tovlan.

Man Bites Dog - Tory MP Caught out as Nazi Cross Dresser






Tory MP Adrian Burley Dresses Up as Nazi
What has not been revealed in most of the popular coverage is that Burley was a prominent member of Conservative Friends of Israel.

Of course there is nothing much amiss here. As you may be aware, Tory MP Aidan Burley, who Cameron was forced to sack from his position of Private Parliamentary Secretary (the lowest rung on the government ladder) recently, hosted a stag party in a hotel in the French Alps where guests dressed in Nazi uniforms and repeatedly toasted the Third Reich. Unsurprisingly Burley is an admirer of another racist state, Israel.

A Tory MP getting dressed up as a member of the SS! Hardly news. Don’t both Nazis and Tories hate socialists, communists, the unemployed, anyone who stands up for their rights? After all our ruling classes have always had a soft spot for the 3rd Reich. At least they knew what to do with communists and socialists. So who can be surprised at Adrian Burley, newly-elected MP for Cannock Chase. And aren't most respectable anti-Semites today supporters of Israel and Zionism?

After all, even the younger members of the Royal Family aka Harry Windsor, also have a soft spot for Hitler and co. It wasn’t that long ago that Prince Harry was dressing up in an Afrika Corps. Uniform. What one may ask was Burley’s offence. Getting caught out? And it should come as no surprise that the Conservative Friends of Israel have defended Nazi Supporter Burley MP.

Here is an entry from the loathsome Burley in the MPs register of members interests.
6. Overseas visits Name of donor: Conservative Friends of Israel Address of donor:

45B Westbourne Terrace, London W2 3UR and Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Government of Israel
Amount of donation (or estimate of the probable value): £974 from CFI; £574 from the Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

Meals provided by other hosts below registrable threshold.


Destination of visit: Israel
Date of visit: 29 May-3 June 2011
Purpose of visit: fact-finding political delegation to Israel and the West Bank.
(hat tip Terry Gallogly)

And another thing one should remember. If accused of ‘anti-Semitism’ the best defence is ‘
But I’m a supporter of Israel’. Andrew Breivik, Michal Kaminski, indeed any semi-intelligent anti-Semite usually resorts to this defence. And not without reason. Was not racism against another ‘race’ part of the justification for both Israel and Nazi Germany?

Tony Greenstein


'Nazi stag' MP went to Israel as guest of Tory lobby group
By Joseph Millis - Thursday 15th December 2011

A Tory MP "friend of Israel and the Jewish community" this week expressed regret after he was photographed at a stag party in France, where guests chanted Nazi slogans and dressed up in SS uniforms.

Aidan Burley, MP for Cannock Chase Tweeted: "Deeply regret inappropriate behaviour by some guests at stag party I attended and I am sorry for any offence that was caused."

The MP, who described a visit to Yad Vashem as "most moving", [some of the best Nazi supporters find Yad Vashem 'moving' - wasn't that its purpose?] was pictured eating and drinking at French ski resort Val Thorens with 12 friends, some of whom chanted "Hitler, Hitler, Hitler".

After moving on to a British-themed pub, it was reported that some of the group repeatedly chanted: "Mein Fuhrer", "Himmler" and "Eichmann".

A French police spokesman said an investigation could be launched into the incident. "Anti-Semitic and pro-Nazi crimes are taken seriously. Anyone suspected of breaking the law can and will be prosecuted," he said.

While one of the friends toasted the Third Reich, Burley, a senior aide to Transport Secretary Justine Greening, was filmed sitting next to another party goer dressed in a black SS uniform and cap.

First-time MP Burley had travelled to Israel earlier this year as the guest of the Conservative Friends of Israel and the Israeli Foreign Ministry. According to the MPs' registry of interests, the CFI donated 974 pounds while the ministry gave 574 pounds to the trip. After his visit to Israel, Burley wrote on his webpage:

"Most movingly of all we visited Yad Vashem, Israel's Holocaust memorial museum, which was an emotional and heartrending experience seeing the exhibits and hearing the stories of the Jews during the war."
Shadow Transport Minister and chair of Labour Friends of Israel John Woodcock called for Burley to be sacked: "This sickening behaviour brings shame on the country and it is particularly appalling that an MP seems to have been standing by while it happened. David Cameron should stop dithering and sack him," he said.

However, CFI director Stuart Polak said he had "worked closely and travelled to Israel with Aidan Burley. I know him well and he does not have an anti-Semitic bone in his body. The actions of his friends in France were inexcusable. Aidan should not have been associated with this. "Aidan is a friend of Israel and a friend of the Jewish community." [Quite - a good friend of Israel and apparently the Jewish community just loves to dress up as a Nazi!!]
But Board of Deputies CEO Jon Benjamin attacked the MP. "We find it alarming that Aiden Burley MP did nothing to confront friends who were dressed in Nazi uniforms and were behaving so appallingly. "Burley, who has confessed to have learned a great deal from visiting Holocaust Museum Yad Vashem, clearly still has much to learn."

Actually the problem is that he learnt only too well. Certainly he has much to learn because he has been a maverick right wing odd-ball for some time [TG]


Port-fuelled anti-Semitism
The revelations of port-fuelled anti-semitism at Oxford University Conservative Association are shocking but by no means the latest soiling of this right-wing political cradle. A look back through the Oxonian archives yields further anecdotes about their forbears – the crucial difference being that they are now special advisers and MPs.

Step forward Aidan Burley, Conservative MP for Cannock Chase, whose peers may now regret providing Cherwell’s Evelyn gossip column with a running commentary of their boozing and other insalubrious exploits too lurid for this family blog. Activities of the group included the acquisition of strippers (pictured above) and chronicling alleged sexual encounters with visiting family members.

As president of the King Charles Club, a notoriously elitist dining society banned from college premises, Burley arranged entertainments fitting the august institution, including a trip to, erm, a strip club. The alumni magazine of £10,000-per-year King Edwards School in Birmingham, boasted that their former pupil “achieved national notoriety” after he advertised the club’s excursion to Stringfellows in both The Times and Daily Telegraph:

“The King Charles Club of the St John’s College, Oxford, held their annual dinner last night at Stringfellows … after attending divine service at the Banqueting Hall, Whitehall, and laying a wreath at the statue of the Martyr King in Trafalgar Square.”

Parliament is one “exclusive establishment” with rather fewer naked, writhing women than some alumni of King Charles Club have experienced.

EDITORIAL NOTE: While skirting over his expedition to Stringfellows, when approached for comment Aidan Burley denied involvement in procuring a stripper for his friend (inset left above). Unlike his college entertainment, Aidan likes his threats veiled.

This entry was posted in Conservative Party.

The One That Got Away – The One in 300 Palestinians Who Was Acquitted



So Rare is a Palestinian Acquittal that the Israeli Press Felt Obliged to Report It!
This blog is know for its attempts to bend over backwards to be fair to Zionism and Israel. It is extremely unfortunate that we can find so little that is good to say about it. But never let it be said that we don’t seek out good news stories.

We are therefore happy to report one good story. I have just posted an article on how a mere 99.7% of Palestinian prisoners are convicted, it is therefore incumbent on me to post a story on the one in 300 that got away.

Also revealed in this report is the fact that family members are also imprisoned and abused in order to bring further pressure on someone who is arrested. And they still call Israel the 'only democracy in the Middle East'?

Tony Greenstein

Haaretz 07.12.11

Israeli military courts usually accept testimony of Shin Bet security service agents, even in cases where no one disputes confessions were obtained after suspects were beaten.

By Chaim Levinson

A West Bank military tribunal recently acquitted a Palestinian man who had been charged with several security offenses, after ruling that interrogators used prohibited practices including physical and psychological abuse and threats involving family members to force a confession from the suspect. Acquittal in such circumstances is rare; Israeli military courts usually accept the testimony of Shin Bet security service agents, even in cases where no one disputes that confessions were obtained after the suspects were beaten.

Ayman Hamida, 37, from Izariya in East Jerusalem, was charged with carrying out a series of offenses over a period of several months. The most serious charge was shooting at a Border Police outpost near Jerusalem in September 2009.

Following his arrest, Hamida was brought to a Shin Bet facility. After being interrogated over a 40-day period by a team of agents, he was indicted for 17 crimes. The indictment was based in part on a confession obtained during interrogation.

Although Hamida was acquitted on many of the charges, he was convicted for one shooting incident in September 2009 after a co-conspirator implicated him. The co-conspirator is awaiting sentencing.

At his trial, in the Judea Military Court, Hamida asked to retract his confession. He said that in the course of the 40-day interrogation he was threatened with administrative detention, his brother was brought in for interrogation in an effort to force him to confess and Shin Bet officials threatened to bring his sister to the facility, as well.

Hamida told the court that agents were placed in his cell in order to get him to confess. He said they choked, beat and spit at him; they deprived him of food and took away his clothing when he refused to cooperate. All of Hamida's Shin Bet interrogators testified at his trial.

This week, judges Lt. Col. Zvi Lekach, Lt. Col Tal Band and Maj. Amir Dahan accepted all of the defense's claims and criticized the Shin Bet for its conduct.

"The testimony of the Shin Bet investigators led me to conclude that the investigation - its pace, the things said, the direct contact with the defendant's family, the veiled threat of administrative detention in the future - deprived the defendant of free will," Dahan wrote. "I understood from the interrogators' testimony that the interrogation was neither ideal nor respectful, and that harsh and problematic measures were used in a manner and frequency that deprived [Hamida] of his free will. This time [they went] over the top, and the defendant was forced into telling his interrogators anything in order to stop the interrogation, to end the veiled threats and to give him even the slightest hope," the judge said. "The Shin Bet interrogators painted a harsh interrogation in overly 'rosy' colors," Lekach wrote, "that appeared not to match the reality of the situation."

The judge focused his criticism on the agents' pressure on Hamida to confess and their apparent manipulation of his emotions and cultural mores, particularly with threats regarding the defendant's sister.

"The distress of someone who was interrogated for what added up to 40 days, during which he was presumably beaten, is very great," Lekach wrote. "When he hears that his sister is also being harmed by his refusal to cooperate with his interrogators, one can assume that he felt intolerable pressure. The court is cognizant of the patriarchal-protective way of life in Arab society, and of the difficult implications of keeping a woman in jail - for the family and for the honor of the men who are responsible for her welfare. For Hamida the pressure was intolerable. The main reason for his confession was his concern for his family," Lekach wrote. "This is the tip of the iceberg of the harsh interrogation methods and the physical and emotional violence used against Palestinian detainees by the Shin Bet,"

Hamida's lawyer, Labib Habib, said to Haaretz. Habib noted that the High Court of Justice has outlawed the arrest of, or threats to arrest or hurt members of the detainee's family in the course of an interrogation.

In a response, the Shin Bet said its interrogations are carried out in compliance with the law and are monitored by the Justice Ministry and the judicial system. It is still studying the ruling and will consider appealing the acquittal, the agency said.

The Attacks on the Occupy Movement & Police Brutality




How the 'Democracy' in the West is Skin Deep

We often hear lazy reference to the ‘democracies’ in the West. It is true that there are certain long-standing democratic rights that have been won against the ruling classes, but democratic freedoms, especially in the United States, has always been skin deep.

As the reports below who, the attack of the state against the Occupy Movements in Los Angeles and Oakland have been anything but democratic. The mailed fist of the US State has been shown in all its glory. The US, which has presided over the open justification of torture and murder abroad, the ignoring of all the Geneva Convention with Guantanamo and the Patriot Act and associated legislation which has enabled any US citizen to be arrested and held indefinitely by the US military, to say nothing of the powers that Obama has taken to order the execution abroad of any US citizen, have found their resonance nearer home

To those with any illusions in the role of the Police one only needs to ask when the Police have raided factories for breaches of health and safety legislation, when they have raided Wall Street or the Stock Exchange or any of the financial houses in order to seek out the gamblers and inside traders.

We have the ongoing spectacle of the Metropolitan Police and Rupert Murdoch’s News International Corporation. Instead of accepting assurances from NI that only ‘one rogue reporter’ Glenn Mulcaire was involved in the hacking, the Met could have raided the News of the World and Sun newspaper offices, seizing computers and other equipment as they have never hesitated to do with anarchist left-wing or direction action groups. Instead they wined and dined with NI Executives, employing NI personnel in their PR department.

Everywhere in the world, without exception, the Police are the agents of state repression and the enemies of freedom. When even the military crack and ordinary soldiers become won over, the police are the last and most devout supporters of the repressive state and the interests of property and the rich.

Because that is the purpose of the Police. To defend property against the propertyless. That is why, when claiming to uphold the ‘rule of law’ the Police implement those laws which best serve as an excuse for repression. Obstruction means holding a political stall, not a shop displaying its wares. Fox hunting is illegal but Police still turn their attentions to hunt saboteurs. Incitement to racial hatred is also illegal but the Police defend the EDL.

Let us not forget, 'democracy' in the West is therefore to put a facade on existing economic equalities. Its ultimate purpose is to protect those inequalities. It prefers social concensus, but is perfectly happy, if needs be, to repond with whatever savagery is necessary. Hence the punitive terms of imprisonment for this summer's rioting.

Tony Greenstein


By Yasha Levine, eXiled Online
December 3, 2011

Yasha Levine is editor of the eXiled.com

I finally got home Thursday afternoon after spending two nights in jail, and have had a hard time getting my bearings. On top of severe dehydration and sleep deprivation, I’ve got one hell of pounding migraine. So I’ll have to keep this brief for now. But I wanted to write down a few things that I witnessed and heard while locked up by LA’s finest…

First off, don’t believe the PR bullshit. There was nothing peaceful or professional about the LAPD’s attack on Occupy LA–not unless you think that people peacefully protesting against the power of the financial oligarchy deserve to be treated the way I saw Russian cops treating the protesters in Moscow and St. Petersburg who were demonstrating against the oligarchy under Putin and Yeltsin, before we at The eXiled all got tossed out in 2008. Back then, everyone in the West protested and criticized the way the Russian cops brutally snuffed out dissent, myself included. Now I’m in America, at a demonstration, watching exactly the same brutal crackdown…

While people are now beginning to learn that the police attack on Occupy LA was much more violent than previously reported, few actually realize that much—if not most—of the abuse happened while the protesters were in police custody, completely outside the range of the press and news media. And the disgraceful truth is that a lot of the abuse was police sadism, pure and simple:

* I heard from two different sources that at least one busload of protesters (around 40 people) was forced to spend seven excruciating hours locked in tiny cages on a Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Dept. prison bus, denied food, water and access to bathroom facilities. Both men and women were forced to urinate in their seats. Meanwhile, the cops in charge of the bus took an extended Starbucks coffee break.

* The bus that I was shoved into didn’t move for at least an hour. The whole time we listened to the screams and crying from a young woman whom the cops locked into a tiny cage at the front of the bus. She was in agony, begging and pleading for one of the policemen to loosen her plastic handcuffs. A police officer sat a couple of feet away the entire time that she screamed–but wouldn’t lift a finger.

* Everyone on my bus felt her pain–literally felt it. That’s because the zip-tie handcuffs they use—like the ones you see on Iraq prisoners in Abu Ghraib—cut off your circulation and wedge deep through your skin, where they can do some serious nerve damage, if that’s the point. And it did seem to be the point. A couple of guys around me were writhing in agony in their hard plastic seats, hands handcuffed behind their back.

* The 100 protesters in my detainee group were kept handcuffed with their hands behind their backs for 7 hours, denied food and water and forced to sit/sleep on a concrete floor. Some were so tired they passed out face down on the cold and dirty concrete, hands tied behind their back. As a result of the tight cuffs, I wound up losing sensation in my left palm/thumb and still haven’t recovered it now, a day and a half after they finally took them off.

* One seriously injured protester, who had been shot with a shotgun beanbag round and had an oozing bloody welt the size of a grapefruit just above his elbow, was denied medical attention for five hours. Another young guy, who complained that he thought his arm had been broken, was not given medical attention for at least as long. Instead, he spent the entire pre-booking procedure handcuffed to a wall, completely spaced out and staring blankly into space like he was in shock.

* An Occupy LA demonstrator in his 50s who was in my cell block in the Los Angeles Metropolitan Detention Center told us all about when a police officer forced him to take a shit with his hands handcuffed behind his back, which made pulling down his pants and sitting down on the toilet extremely difficult and awkward. And he had to do this in sight of female police officers, all of which made him feel extremely ashamed, to say the least.

* There were two vegetarians and one vegan in my cell. When I left jail around 1:30 pm, they still had not been given food, despite the fact that they were constantly being promised that it would come.

* There were 292 people arrested at Occupy LA. About 75 of them have been released or have gotten out on bail, according the National Lawyers Guild. Most are still inside, slapped with $5,000 to $10,000 bail. According to a bail bondsman I know, this is unprecedented. Misdemeanors are almost always released on their own recognizance, which means that they don’t pay any bail at all. Or at most it’s a $100.

* That means the harsh, long detentions are meant to be are a purely punitive measure against Occupy LA protesters–an order that had to come from the very top.

An Occupy LA demonstrator in his 50s who was in my cell block in the Los Angeles Metropolitan Detention Center told us all about when a police officer forced him to take a shit with his hands handcuffed behind his back, which made pulling down his pants and sitting down on the toilet extremely difficult and awkward. And he had to do this in sight of female police officers, all of which made him feel extremely ashamed, to say the least.

* There were two vegetarians and one vegan in my cell. When I left jail around 1:30 pm, they still had not been given food, despite the fact that they were constantly being promised that it would come.

* There were 292 people arrested at Occupy LA. About 75 of them have been released or have gotten out on bail, according the National Lawyers Guild. Most are still inside, slapped with $5,000 to $10,000 bail. According to a bail bondsman I know, this is unprecedented. Misdemeanors are almost always released on their own recognizance, which means that they don’t pay any bail at all. Or at most it’s a $100.

* That means the harsh, long detentions are meant to be are a purely punitive measure against Occupy LA protesters–an order that had to come from the very top.

« Letter to President Yudof objecting to hiring William Bratton to investigate UC Davis pepper-spray incident

March and Occupation in Solidarity with OccupySantaCruz »


CALIFORNIA – On Friday, November 18, students at UC Davis followed UC Berkeley protests the previous week and set up tents in the UCD quad in solidarity with students and faculty beat at UC Berkeley and the occupation movement. When UC police ordered a dispersal of the quad, non-violent protestors sat down and linked arms. At this point, Officer Pike retrieved a can of pepper spray and casually sprayed sitting students three times. An angry crowd began to gather around the police, demanding they leave — after which, the police conceded and left. Demonstrators gathered and called for a rally that following Monday. On Monday, some 5-10,000 students, workers and faculty gathered in the UCD quad and held a General Assembly. The UC Davis GA last Monday ratified a call for a strike for today, November 28. Solidarity actions have been organized at multiple other UC campuses. Among the top concerns include resignation of UCD Chancellor Katehi, some form of accountability of UC police or no police on campus (see UCD English Dept.), and no tuition increases. Today is also the first day of the UC Regents meeting that was rescheduled due to planned protests; this meeting will be teleconferenced from several locations including UC Davis.

Updates:

6:00am – UCSC business building Hahn has been shut down with students blocking entrances. Read more

10:50pm – Around 500 present at different teachins at UCD.
~1pm: Some 200 students at UC Davis have occupied Dutton Hall, reportedly in solidarity with students who shutdown Hahn student services at UCSC
2:45pm – UCSC Hahn student services is occupied by 100-150 students. Specifically the financial aid office and surrounding halls. Support will be needed.
3:50pm – Occupied Hahn is holding a General Assembly right now.
4:15pm – Occupied Hahn GA is over and will reconvene at 7pm.
6:45pm – Occupied Dutton has decided to stay the night
7:15pm – Occupied Dutton has decided to stay for the next two weeks with three demands:

1) Katehi’s immediate resignation
2) Cops off campus, with alternative safety force (to be worked out)
3) Immediate freeze on tuition

~11:30pm – Occupied Hahn at UCSC has decided to stay for at least the night. The previous General Assembly that helped establish the Hahn actions today previously approved the same demands that Occupied Dutton ratified today in solidarity with Davis students. An assembly will be held at the occupation at 9am, with another GA to follow later.

Tuesday, 29 November
~11am – Hahn occupiers decide to vacate the building to allow student services to return to their normal function, including Disability Resources. Upon vacating the building, occupiers have supplied a list of demands to the administration.

26 December 2011

Defend Marc Ellis - Jewish Dissident and Hate Target for Jewish Zionist Fundamentalists



Please join co-chairs Cornel West, Rosemary Ruether and Archbishop Desmond Tutu signing this petition.

Ken Starr, former prosecutor of Bill Clinton, and currently President of Baylor University, to dismiss dissident Jewish voice Dr. Marc Ellis.

For more than three decades the prophetic voice of Marc Ellis has influenced generations of academics and activists. His dissident voice in the realm of contemporary Jewish identity and his theology of solidarity with Palestinians has been encouraged by numerous scholar-activists including Noam Chomsky, Edward Said and the three of us, Rosemary Ruether, Cornel West and Archbishop Desmond Tutu.

Unfortunately this voice is now being silenced at Baylor University where Marc has served with distinction for almost fifteen years as University Professor and Director of the Center for Jewish Studies. With the approval of Kenneth Starr, President of Baylor University, Marc Ellis is under internal investigation in what looks more and more like a persecution to silence a Jewish voice of dissent. In short, Baylor is re-writing its rules to dismiss Marc Ellis from the faculty.

We, the undersigned, request President Starr to honor Dr. Ellis' academic freedom and stop all hostility toward him, including any attempt at dismissal. Join us signing this petition.
Cornel West, Rosemary Radford Ruether and Archbishop Desmond Tutu (co-chairs of the committee)

(more information about 1. the internal investigation and 2. faq in the update section)

November 30, 2011

I first read Professor Marc Ellis’ book “Toward a Jewish Theology of Liberation” as a rabbinical student back in the mid-1980s – and suffice to say it fairly rocked my world at the time. Here was a Jewish thinker thoughtfully and compellingly advocating a new kind of post-Holocaust theology: one that didn’t view Jewish suffering as “unique” and “untouchable” but as an experience that should sensitize us to the suffering and persecution of all peoples everywhere.

And yet further: Ellis had the courage to take these ideas to the place that few in the Jewish world were willing to go. If we truly believe in the God of liberation, if our sacred tradition truly demands of us that we stand with the oppressed, then the Jewish people cannot only focus on our own oppression – we must also come to grips with our own penchant for oppression, particularly when it comes to the actions of the state of Israel. And yes, if we truly believe in the God of liberation this also means that we must ultimately be prepared to stand with the Palestinians in their struggle for liberation.

When I first read Ellis’ words, I didn’t know quite what to make of them. They flew so directly in the face of such post-Holocaust theologians as Elie Wiesel, Rabbi Irving Greenberg and Emil Fackenheim – all of whom viewed the state of Israel in quasi-redemptive terms. And they were certainly at odds with the views of those who tended the gates of the American Jewish community, for whom this sort of critique of Israel was strictly forbidden.

Over the years, however, I’ve found Ellis’ ideas to be increasingly prescient, relevant – and I daresay even liberating. As a rabbi, I’ve come to deeply appreciate his brave willingness to not only ask the hard questions, but to unflinchingly pose the answers as well. And it is not at all surprising to me that we are now witnessing a new generation of rabbis and young Jewish leaders starting down the road he has paved for us.

All this to say I am profoundly sorrowed to learn that Ellis is currently under threat of losing his job at Baylor University due to an investigation led by new university president Ken Starr.

By every appearance, Ellis has had a distinguished academic career, having taught at Maryknoll School of Theology, Harvard Center for the Study of World Religions and Florida State University. Thirteen years ago, he was appointed Professor of American and Jewish Studies at Baylor, where he founded Baylor University’s Center for American and Jewish Studies and currently serves as its director.

There is ample reason to mistrust the academic validity of this investigation. According to a new petition now being circulated by Cornel West and Rosemary Ruether:

Marc Ellis was brought to Baylor in 1998 and all previous presidents supported his dissident voice. After Ken Starr (nemesis of Clinton in the White House) became president in 2010 the attacks started. During the last year Baylor lawyers were instructed to communicate with many of Marc’s colleagues, past students and staff. The objective was to request all of them to report all “abuse of authority.” Most of us explained to the lawyers that was a lost cause because Marc has been an exemplar colleague, professor and mentor.

But starting this Fall he was separated from his classes, his center closed and a hearing scheduled to take place some time in this academic year. As far as we know the accusations are about abuse of authority but we are not aware of the details because they are part of the internal legal process. Obviously it is about something else: Marc’s dissident voice. We will inform all of you as soon as we know more information.

In a statement released yesterday, Ellis commented thus:

Given what I currently understand of the rules of the Baylor process I will, for now, honor the process by not discussing the specifics, except to say that I believe this is a pretext to silence an independent voice at the place for which I have had deep appreciation.

I write now to ask you to please join me in signing this petition in support of Ellis – an important Jewish dissident thinker and (as his many academic colleagues are now attesting) a truly distinguished scholar. I would add: even if you don’t personally agree with all of his ideas, I urge you to support his cause. It is high time for us to stand down those who would trample academic freedom, shun open discourse and debate, and muzzle those with whom they simply disagree.

I’ll end with Professor Ellis’ own words, all too sadly apt under the circumstances:

Prophetic Jewish theology, or a Jewish theology of liberation, seeks to bring to light the hidden and sometimes censored movements of Jewish life. It seeks to express the dissent of those afraid or unable to speak. Ultimately, a Jewish theology of liberation seeks, in concert with others, to weave disparate hopes and aspirations into the very heart of Jewish life.

(“Toward a Jewish Theology of Liberation,” p. 206)

Director Marc H. Ellis
Dr. Marc Ellis lecturing

University Professor of Jewish Studies
Professor of History
Director, Center for Jewish Studies

One Bear Place #97174
Waco, TX 76798-7174
Ph. 254-710-3609
Marc_Ellis@baylor.edu

Biography:

Influenced by the Jewish ethical tradition and the dissonance of Jewish life after the Holocaust, with other Jews of Conscience, Professor Marc H. Ellis has sought to rescue the Jewish ethical tradition in the face of the demands of the 20th and now 21st Century. In his early career, he became deeply interested in Holocaust Theology and Liberation Theology as a reflection on and expression of the mores of the Judeo-Christian tradition when faced with the socio-political-economic crises and genocidal assaults of oppressive nation-states and the international political and economic order. Over the years Professor Ellis has translated that expression of ethical values into an understanding of the Jewish ethical tradition, now facing its own moral crisis as Jewish identity becomes increasingly uncritically identified with the governmental politics of America and Israel.

Within that analysis, Professor Ellis has developed further insight into Jewish-Christian-Muslim relations, and their complexity in the modern world. Since then, he has used his position, influence, and writings to elucidate further on these difficulties, and been welcomed by a wide variety of audiences, from university forums to international institutes, and faith-based groups seeking justice and peace while working within complex religious and political identities.

Professor Marc H. Ellis was born in North Miami Beach, Florida in 1952. He earned B.A. and M.A. degrees Magna Cum Laude and Phi Beta Kappa, in Religion and American Studies at Florida State University, where he studied under the Holocaust theologian Richard Rubenstein, and the American historian of the Catholic Worker movement, William Miller. He received his doctorate in History from Marquette University in 1980 where he was inducted into Phi Alpha Theta and the Jesuit Honor Society. Upon graduation he accepted a faculty position at the Maryknoll School of Theology in Maryknoll, New York, becoming founding director of their M.A. program and the Maryknoll Institute for Justice and Peace.

Professor Ellis was made full professor in 1988, and remained at Maryknoll until 1995, when he assumed a position first as a Senior Fellow at Harvard's Center for the Study of World Religions, and then as a Visiting Scholar at Harvard's Center for Middle Eastern Studies, as well as a visiting professorship at Florida State University. Professor Ellis is University Professor of Jewish Studies, Professor of History, and Director of the Center for Jewish Studies at Baylor University, where he first arrived in 1998.

Besides his years at Harvard University, Professor Ellis has held a variety of visiting teaching appointments. These include: Heytrop College, University of London (1987), United Theological College in Bangalore, India (2001), the M.A program in Peace Studies at the University of Innsbruck, Tyerol, Austria (2008), and the Department of Peace and Conflict Studies, University for Peace, San Jose, Costa Rica (2009).

Professor Ellis has authored and edited more than twenty books. Among them are: A Year at the Catholic Worker; Peter Maurin: Prophet in the Twentieth Century; Faithfulness in an Age of Holocaust; Toward a Jewish Theology of Liberation; Beyond Innocence and Redemption: Confronting the Holocaust and Israeli Power; Ending Auschwitz: The Future of Jewish and Christian Life; Unholy Alliance: Religion and Atrocity in Our Time; O'Jerusalem: The Contested Future of the Jewish Covenant; Practicing Exile: The Religious Journey of an American Jew; Out of the Ashes: The Search for Jewish Identity in the Twenty-first Century; Reading the Torah Out Loud: A Journey of Lament and Hope; Judaism Does Not Equal Israel, which was nominated for the Louisville Grawemeyer Award in Religion in 2011 and again in 2012. Professor Ellis' latest book Encountering the Jewish Future: Elie Wiesel, Martin Buber, Abraham Joshua Heschel, Hannah Arendt and Emmanuel Levinas, was published in the Fall of 2011.

Professor Ellis has published more than 100 articles and spoken at more than 300 universities, seminaries, and academies in the United States, Europe, Africa, Asia and Latin America. His writings have been translated into German, French, Dutch, Italian, Spanish, Arabic, Mandarin, Hebrew, Korean and Urdu. His lecture topics include such diverse areas as Middle East policy; the Holocaust; the future of Israel; Jewish identity; Jewish-Christian relations; Contemporary Spirituality; and Post-Holocaust Jewish and Christian thought.

Professor Ellis has been interviewed in a variety of documentary and interview formats, including the BBC, National Public Radio, C-Span and FrenchTV-24. He has authored numerous opinion pieces that have been published in diverse media outlets, including the Houston Chronicle, Ha'aretz, Al-Ahram and the International Herald Tribune.

Among other honors, Professor Ellis has been inducted into the Martin Luther King Collegium of Scholars at Morehouse College. He was also honored at the 2000 national convention of the American Academy of Religion with an entire session devoted to discussion of his work. In 2011, Professor Ellis was again honored with a session at the AAR on his work, "The Persistence of the Prophetic: Encountering and Engaging the Work of Marc Ellis." Presenters include Cornel West (Princeton University), Rosemary Radford Ruether (Claremont Graduate School), Sharon Welch (Meadville Lombard Theological School), Stacey Floyd-Thomas (Vanderbilt University Divinity School), Gary Dorrien (Union Theological Seminary and Columbia University) and Davina Lopez (Eckerd College).

For more than 30 years, as Founding Director of the Institute for Justice and Peace at Maryknoll School of Theology, and Founding Director of the Center for Jewish Studies at Baylor University, Professor Ellis has been hosting events of public and religious significance. Among the many events notable for their international reach are: "The Future of Liberation Theology" (1988) – Keynote, Fr. Gustavo Gutierrez; "The Next Fifty Years: Beginning a Millennium of Hope" (2000) - Keynote, Professor Richard Rubenstein; "Honoring Heschel at 100" (2007) – Keynote, Professor Susannah Heschel.

The Center for Jewish Studies also honored Hannah Arendt in a symposium dedicated to her work (2007). In subsequent years professor Ellis' Center has sponsored international conferences: "On the Boundary: HoweverWhereverWhomever" (2008); "Texts and Otherness: Politics, Empire, and Post-Secularism in Religious Studies"(2009); "Reimagining Paul"(2010).

A major focus of the Center for Jewish Studies is its Annual Holocaust Remembrance Luncheon held at Baylor University's Truett Seminary. Last year the Center held its tenth annual luncheon. In years past the Center has featured historians of the Holocaust, music that was composed in the death camps, children of Holocaust survivors reflections on Holocaust literature, Christians, and Palestinians reflecting on the Holocaust, and the question of God after Auschwitz. Included among our distinguished scholars who have lectured at our event are Professor Michael Phayer, Professor Emeritus of History at Marquette University, Dr. Sara Roy, a child of Holocaust survivors and Senior Scholar at the Center for Middle Eastern Studies at Harvard University, Professor Alan Berger, who holds the Raddock Eminent Scholar Chair on Holocaust Studies at Florida Atlantic University and Sister Professor Carol Rittner, a noted Holocaust historian and commentator, who is Distinguished Professor of Holocaust and Genocide Studies at Richard Stockton College. In 2011, Dr. Anders Runesson of McMaster College delivered the Annual Holocaust Remembrance lecture, "Paul, the Jews, and the Holocaust."

As a public intellectual, Professor Ellis has spoken at the United Nations in New York and in Vienna, the Carter Center in Atlanta, the Truman Institute at Hebrew University, the James Baker Institute at Rice University, the United States Memorial Holocaust Museum in Washington, D. C., the John F. Kennedy School of Government at Harvard University, the Air War College at Maxwell Air Force Base in Montgomery, Alabama, at a conference in Oslo, Norway on the 15th anniversary of the Oslo Accords and most recently a series of lectures in New Delhi, India. He has given endowed and keynote lectures in the United States, Israel, Canada, Taiwan, Korea and the Philippines.

Professor Ellis serves on the National Advisory Board of the Middle East Council, the Editorial Board of Tikkun Magazine and for three years on the Board of the Society of Jewish Ethics. Currently, Professor Ellis serves on the Steering Committee, Ethics Section, of the American Academy of Religion.

In 2011, Professor Ellis delivered the Allen-Head lecture at Austin College and the Hilda B. Silverman Memorial Lecture on Israel/Palestine at Harvard University.

Commentary on Professor Ellis's work:

Senator George McGovern, former Presidential candidate:

"This perceptive and well-conceived book offers the reader a masterful analysis of one of the most compelling issues of our age."

Professor Noam Chomsky, Institute Professor and Professor Emeritus of Linguistics at Massachusetts Institute of Technology:

"Marc Ellis has demonstrated great courage, integrity, and insight in the very important work he has been doing for years. It has been an inspiration for all of us."

The late Professor Edward Said, University Professor at Columbia University:

"Marc Ellis is a brilliant writer, a deeply thoughtful and courageous mind, an intellectual who has broken the death-hold of mindless tradition and unreflective cliché to produce a superb account of post-Holocaust understanding, with particular reference to the Palestinian people and the moral obligation of Israelis and Diaspora Jews. He is a man to be listened to with respect and admiration."

Professor Susannah Heschel, the Eli Black Chair in Jewish Studies at Dartmouth College:

"Marc Ellis has written a book for people who want to think. Challenging our conventional ideas, he forces us to reconsider our assumptions regarding Jewish identity and politics. What emerges is a fascinating and original reconfiguration of some of the most hotly debated political and religious topics today."

Rabbi Elliot Dorff, Rector and Distinguished Professor of Philosophy at the University of Judaism:

"Ellis masterfully uses the central, Jewish story of Exodus and Sinai to call for a contemporary Jewish (and Christian) theology of liberation. He argues against current political policies based on Jewish vulnerability, with the Holocaust as the chief lens, and issues a prophetic call for contemporary Jews to return to the liberation theology embedded in the Exodus, seeking justice for all. In the Israeli-Palestinian context, that requires both sides to "embrace revolutionary forgiveness" as they find ways to come to less-than-ideal but tolerable resolutions of their conflicts, and it requires Americans living in a post-9/11 world to reevaluate their understanding of Muslims and Islam. Whether you agree with Ellis' conclusions or not, you cannot help but be stimulated by his serious and meaningful use of this central Jewish story to understand and respond creatively to some of the most pressing issues of our time."

Archbishop Desmund Tutu, Nobel Laureate:
"Marc Ellis shows that the voice of prophecy has not been silenced in the Jewish community. We will all be the poorer if Ellis' voice is not heeded but how wonderfully enriched if it is."

Israeli Military Courts Achieve a 99.7% Conviction Rate









Even Nazi Germany Did Not Achieve This Rate of Conviction Until Special Peoples Courts Were Set Up Under Ronald Freiser

What kind of state achieves a 99.7% conviction rate in its Military Courts? Even Hitler only managed 90.3% in the Saaar plebicite, although to be fair, in 1938 with the Anchluss in Austria he improved on this, to the extent of achieving 99.7% of the vote. So the ‘only democracy in the Middle East’ can proudly proclaim that it has a higher rate of acquittals in its Military Courts where it comes to trying Palestinians in the West Bank than Austrians who were credited with voting ‘no’.

Of course this isn’t quite fair. Undoubtedly in Austria negative votes were discarded and even more voters were deterred from voting in the first place because they knew that fascists did not respect the anonymity of ballots. Whereas in the West Bank we can be sure that the 99.7% of convictions are accurate. But of course most Palestinians are pressurised into pleading guilty because their confessions, which are almost always accepted by the courts. ‘Confessions’ take place in the period when they are denied lawyers and that period can be 28 days, more than enough time to beat someone into submission And given that plead bargaining is integral to the system, then pleading guilty and accepting a lesser sentence is preferable to being remanded and found guilty, as nearly all prisoners are, of an ‘offence’ carrying a higher sentence.

Dogs are used against children and adults alike. Another practice the SS guards in extermination/concentration camps used. Because of the comparison with the SS and Nazi use of dogs, the Israeli Police never use dogs against Jewish demonstrators. They are used soley for Palestinian demonstrations (which of course Israeli Jews attend - but they're not really Jews anyway!)!

Report shows the military appeals courts decidedly favor the prosecution, with judges accepting 67 percent of prosecution appeals, as opposed to only 33 percent of appeals filed by the defense.
By Chaim Levinson

Virtually all - 99.74 percent, to be exact - of cases heard by the military courts in the territories end in a conviction, according to data in the military courts' annual report, which has been obtained by Haaretz.

The report also shows that the military appeals courts decidedly favor the prosecution, with appeals court judges accepting 67 percent of appeals filed by the prosecution, as opposed to only 33 percent of appeals filed by the defense.

The military courts, headed by Col. Aharon Mishnayot, deal with all criminal and security cases involving Palestinians, from their detention through their appeals. Only very exceptional, usually symbolic cases are heard by Israeli courts.

The military court system also includes committees that hear appeals against decisions by Israel Defense Forces commanders, committees that approve administrative detentions, and a committee that approves expulsion orders.

According to the report, 9,542 cases were wrapped up in 2010, of which 2,016 involved hostile terror activity, 763 disorderly conduct and the rest Palestinians staying illegally in Israel, traffic offenses and criminal activity.

The report states that 25 cases ended in full acquittal, meaning that the conviction rate is 99.74 percent. But 4 percent of the cases result in at least partial acquittal on one or more of the charges.

The administrative detention panels, headed by Lt. Col. Shlomi Kokhav, handled 714 requests for administrative detention in 2010, of which 98.77 percent were approved.

Only 51 percent of these requests were honored in full, however. The rest offset days the suspect had already been held, or put certain restrictions on the relevant military commander.


Yesh Din report finds Palestinian detainees denied due process rights in military court hearings. According to group, almost 100% of trials lead to convictions, average hearing is two-minutes long. Army: Report full of mistakes
Associated PressPublished: 01.06.08, Israel News

An Israeli human rights group charges that Israel's military court system for Palestinian suspects in the West Bank produces almost automatic convictions.

A report by the Yesh Din organization found that in 2006, more than 99.7% of those accused are found guilty, some 95% of the cases end with a plea bargain and the average hearing is just two minutes long.

Yesh Din, which said that its inquiry was the first of its kind, found major failings in the court's due process: Hearings were held in Hebrew and the Arabic-speaking suspects often did not understand the charges brought against them, they were unable to present a full defense or have an effective counsel.

"Most are detained in Israel and their attorneys are not able to meet them," said Michael Sfard, Yesh Din's legal counsel. In addition, minors were often tried as adults and detained at length before being charged. Sfard said the 0.29% acquittal rating in 2006 (23 out of 9,123) was most jarring. "We think that this is an outrageous number which clouds the presumption of innocence," he said. "It is unreasonable that a justice system will have such a low figure of victory of the defense."
The army said it had not been provided the full Yesh Din report and could only respond to an initial draft. Still, the army said in a statement, the report was filled with flaws, faulty research methods and mistaken analysis. The army said its court system operated with full disclosure and stressed that defendants were provided fair trials, hearings had simultaneous translations and defendants were provided with all the material against them in advance.

'Some 9,000 prisoners currently held in Israel'

The military courts were established after Israel conquered the West Bank and Gaza in the 1967 war to administer Palestinians charged with security-related and criminal offenses.
More than 150,000 Palestinians have been prosecuted in these courts since 1990, and about half the 9,000 prisoners currently being held in Israel were sent to prison by the military courts, according to Yesh Din. Yesh Din's board includes Michael Ben Yair, a former Israeli attorney general, retired Gen. Shlomo Lahat, a former Tel Aviv mayor, and Shulamit Aloni, a former cabinet minister.

Two weeks ago, the group faulted the military for not opening enough investigations into allegations of mistreatment of Palestinians.

The Israeli military launched 207 investigations into troops' suspected crimes against Palestinians in 2007, up 36% from the year before, the military said.

Even Ha'aretz Accepts the Legitimacy of Comparison with Apartheid



This is an interesting article in Ha'aretz, all that is left of Israel’s liberal press, after Conrad Black took over the Jerusalem Post over 20 years ago and turned it into another right-wing nut job.

It is interesting not least because of the comparison made with Apartheid in South Africa, however inadequately, and the belief that there was no discrimination under the Israeli Labour Party. Notwithstanding the above caveats, the article is interesting for how a section of Israel’s former ruling class is understanding and perceiving events.

Tony Greenstein

Haaretz 25.11.11
Haaretz publisher and owner Amos Schocken asks: Is there a future for an Israel in which inequality and discrimination are taking root?

By Amos Schocken

Speaking in the Knesset in January 1993, Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin said, "Iran is in the initial stages of an effort to acquire nonconventional capability in general, and nuclear capability in particular. Our assessment is that Iran today has the appropriate manpower and sufficient resources to acquire nuclear arms within 10 years. Together with others in the international community, we are monitoring Iran's nuclear activity. They are not concealing the fact that the possibility that Iran will possess nuclear weapons is worrisome, and this is one of the reasons that we must take advantage of the window of opportunity and advance toward peace."

At that time, Israel had a strategy - which began to be implemented in the Oslo accords, put an end to the priority granted the settlement project and aimed to improve the treatment of Israel's Arab citizens.

If things had gone differently, the Iran issue might look different today. However, as it turned out, the Oslo strategy collided with another, stronger ideology: the ideology of Gush Emunim (Bloc of the Faithful ), which since the 1970s, apart from the Oslo period and the time of the withdrawal from Gaza, has established the concrete basis for the actions of Israel's governments. Even governments that were ostensibly far removed from the Gush Emunim strategy implemented it in practice. Ehud Barak boasted that, in contrast to other prime ministers, he did not return territory to the Palestinians - and there's no need to point out once again the increase in the number of settlers during his tenure. The government of Ehud Olmert, which declared its intention to move toward a policy of hitkansut (or "convergence," another name for what Ariel Sharon termed "disengagement" ) in Judea and Samaria, held talks with senior Palestinians on an agreement but did not stop the settlement enterprise, which conflicts with the possibility of any agreement.

The strategy that follows from the ideology of Gush Emunim is clear and simple: It perceives of the Six-Day War as the continuation of the War of Independence, both in terms of seizure of territory, and in its impact on the Palestinian population. According to this strategy, the occupation boundaries of the Six-Day War are the borders that Israel must set for itself. And with regard to the Palestinians living in that territory - those who did not flee or were not expelled - they must be subjected to a harsh regime that will encourage their flight, eventuate in their expulsion, deprive them of their rights, and bring about a situation in which those who remain will not be even second-class citizens, and their fate will be of interest to no one. They will be like the Palestinian refugees of the War of Independence; that is their desired status. As for those who are not refugees, an attempt should be made to turn them into "absentees." Unlike the Palestinians who remained in Israel after the War of Independence, the Palestinians in the territories should not receive Israeli citizenship, owing to their large number, but then this, too, should be of interest to no one.

The ideology of Gush Emunim springs from religious, not political motivations. It holds that Israel is for the Jews, and it is not only the Palestinians in the territories who are irrelevant: Israel's Palestinian citizens are also exposed to discrimination with regard to their civil rights and the revocation of their citizenship.

This is a strategy of territorial seizure and apartheid. It ignores judicial aspects of territorial ownership and shuns human rights and the guarantees of equality enshrined in Israel's Declaration of Independence. It is a strategy of unlimited patience; what is important is the unrelenting progress toward the goal. At the same time, it is a strategy that does not pass up any opportunity that comes its way, such as the composition of the present Knesset and the unclear positions of the prime minister.

The term "apartheid" refers to the undemocratic system of discriminating between the rights of the whites and the blacks, which once existed in South Africa. Even though there is a difference between the apartheid that was practiced there and what is happening in the territories, there are also some points of resemblance. There are two population groups in one region, one of which possesses all the rights and protections, while the other is deprived of rights and is ruled by the first group. This is a flagrantly undemocratic situation.

Since the Six-Day War, there has been no other group in Israel with the ideological resilience of Gush Emunim, and it is not surprising that many politicians have viewed that ideology as a means for realizing personal political ambitions. Zevulun Hammer, who identified this ideology as the way to capture the leadership of the National Religious Party, and Ariel Sharon, who identified this ideology as the way to capture the leadership of Likud, were only two of many. Now Avigdor Lieberman, too, is following this path, but there were and are others, such as the late Hanan Porat, for whom the realization of this ideology was and remains the purpose of their political activity.

This ideology views the creation of an Israeli apartheid regime as a necessary tool for its realization. It has no difficulty with illegal actions and with outright criminality, because it rests on mega-laws that it has adopted and that have no connection with the laws of the state, and because it rests on a perverted interpretation of Judaism. It has scored crucial successes. Even when actions inspired by the Gush Emunim ideology conflict with the will of the government, they still quickly win the backing of the government. The fact that the government is effectively a tool of Gush Emunim and its successors is apparent to everyone who has dealings with the settlers, creating a situation of force multiplication.

This ideology has enjoyed immense success in the United States, of all places. President George H.W. Bush was able to block financial guarantees to Israel because of the settlements established by the government of Yitzhak Shamir (who said lying was permissible to realize the Gush Emunim ideology. Was Benjamin Netanyahu's Bar-Ilan University speech a lie of this kind? ). Now, though, candidates for the Republican Party's presidential nomination are competing among themselves over which of them supports Israel and the occupation more forcefully. Any of them who adopt the approach of the first President Bush will likely put an end to their candidacy.

Whatever the reason for this state of affairs - the large number of evangelicals affiliated with the Republican party, the problematic nature of the West's relations with Islam, or the power of the Jewish lobby, which is totally addicted to the Gush Emunim ideology - the result is clear: It is not easy, and may be impossible, for an American president to adopt an activist policy against Israeli apartheid.

Legalizing the illegal

Because of its inherent illegality, at least in democratic terms, an apartheid regime cannot allow opposition and criticism. The Gush Emunim ideology is obliged to eliminate the latter, and to prevent every effort to block its activity, even if that activity is illegal and even criminal, meant to maintain apartheid. The illegal activity needs to be made legal, whether by amending laws or by changing their judicial interpretation - such things have occurred before, in other places and at other times.

Against this background, we are now seeing the campaign of legislation against, and the unbridled slandering of the Supreme Court, against human rights organizations and against the press, as well as the so-called boycott law, which is aimed at preventing the possibility of dealing with Israeli apartheid in the way South African apartheid was dealt with. It is against this same background that legislation has been submitted that is directed against the Arab citizens in Israel, such as the Loyalty Law and the proposal for a "Basic Law of Israel as the Nation-State of the Jewish People." It is against this background that a campaign of incitement and intimidation is being waged against the necessary and justified critique being voiced by members of academia.

The Supreme Court, which permitted the settlement project and effectively collaborated with the Gush Emunim ideology, has now become an obstacle that needs to be removed - in the eyes of those who still adhere to that ideology - primarily because the court refuses to recognize the possibility of settling on privately owned Palestinian land and did not overturn the government decision to evacuate the settlements in the Gaza Strip. Because the land belongs to the Jews by divine decree and history (from this perspective, there are similarities between Gush Emunim and Hamas ), there is no choice but to elect to the Supreme Court justices who live on Palestinian land, possibly private land, and those who understand that there is no such thing as "land under private Palestinian ownership."

Similarly, this line of thinking goes, the Supreme Court's interpretation of human rights laws also requires its elimination in its present format. Judgments such as those relating to the Kaadan family (allowing an Arab family to build a home in a Jewish community ); the selling of Jewish National Fund land to Arab citizens of Israel; the amendment to the Citizenship Law (no ruling has yet been handed down, but there seems to be a possibility that a majority of justices will rule it illegal ); the opening of a highway to Palestinian traffic - all these rulings conflict with essential elements in Gush Emunim ideology: the discrimination between Jews and Palestinians (in Israel and the territories ) and the deprivation of the Palestinians' rights, which transform them into second-class people, absentees or, best of all, refugees.

Does an Israel of this kind have a future? Over and beyond the question of whether Jewish morality and the Jewish experience allow such circumstances to exist, it is clear that this is a flagrantly unstable and even dangerous situation. It is a situation that will prevent Israel from fully realizing its vast potential, a situation of living by the sword - a sword that could be a third intifada, the collapse of peace with Egypt and a confrontation with a nuclear Iran. Yitzhak Rabin understood that.