7 January 2010

Aid convoy breaks Gaza siege

Despite the Brutality of Mubarak's Police the Convoy Makes it to Gaza

The Complicity of Mubarak and Abbas is There for All to See.

For years revolutionary socialists and Marxists have said that the enemy of the Palestinians is not just Zionism and Israel, but also the collaborators and junior partners of imperialism in the Middle East. Quite often we have been told, for example by those who run Palestine Solidarity Campaign and its Socialist Action leadership, that we must focus simply on Israel.

Now we see the crucial role of Egypt exposed for all to see. Its massed ranks of armed police, battering away at the Convoy and Freedom Marchers. Its demands that part of the Convoy goes through Israel. Its co-ordination with the USA and Israel has taken place at every step.

And perhaps even more remarkably. That miserable collaborator and corrupt quisling, Mahmoud Abbas, has been conspicuous by his silence. Has anyone even heard him raise a voice to protest the siege or to demand that Egypt allow the Convoy in? Has he said anything? Well we can be sure he has told his Israeli handers how much he deplores such activity. But solidarity? The word is alien to Abbas and his corrupt henchmen in Ramallah. And therein lies another lesson.

As the late Israel Shahak, an Israeli anti-Zionist as well as a survivor of the Warsaw Ghetto and Belsen, in respect of Jewish collaborators:
‘Much later, in late winter 1943, a well-known Jewish spy for the Nazis was killed by the Jewish resistance in one of the entrances of the double block of flats (in Leszno Street) which we then inhabited. This was a necessary part of the preparations for the Jewish Revolt which followed not long afterward. I witnessed the killing, done by a very young man with a revolver from a short distance, and then together with a few children and teenagers present danced for joy round the dead body and then ran as quickly as I could to carry the glad tidings to my mother. She was as glad as I was, and only after a short time returned to normality enough to rebuke me for dancing around the corpse, saying that a polite boy does not behave so, however justified was the act….
In short the execution of collaborators was a sine qua non of the ability of the Ghetto Uprising to take off. Likewise with the Palestinian Resistance. Until the collaborators of the Ramallah Junta of Mahmoud Abbas, the surrogate arm of the Israeli occupation, is neutralised, then there is no possibility of a resurgent Intifada and Resistance.

But at least we should celebrate the arrival of the Gaza Convoy. Not because its meagre amount of goods will make any real difference in Gaza but because it is one small chink in the armour. What is needed now is the tearing down (or up!) of the new subterranean Gaza wall, built courtesy of the US Corp of Engineers.

The Egyptian regime of Mubarak has revealed itself in all its squalid glory. Only one ‘pro-Palestinian’ web site that I’ve been able to discover has given its support to Mubarak, and that is the Sink Palestine site of the well-known anti-Semite Mary Rizzo, in an article by Palestinian Haitham Sabbah.

Tony Greenstein

Gaza Convoy Finally Makes It
A humanitarian aid convoy carrying food and medical supplies has arrived in the Gaza Strip nearly a month after it embarked from the UK.

Members of the much-delayed Viva Palestina convoy began passing through Egypt's Rafah border crossing into Gaza on Wednesday, waving Palestinian flags and raising their hands in peace signs.

Al Jazeera's Ayman Mohyeldin, reporting from Gaza, said the first wave of vehicles was greeted by Gaza's Hamas leaders as well as members of a Turkish humanitarian organisation that aided in bringing the convoy to the strip.

"We had been expecting the arrival of the convoy amid much fanfare but it almost caught the Palestinians here by surprise,"
he said.

"The doors suddenly flung open and within minutes the first batch of about 12 or so vehicles made their way from the Egyptian side to the Palestinians."

More than 100 vehicles followed the first batch into Gaza shortly afterward, he said.

Violent clashes
Participants of the convoy are expected to spend the next 48 hours distributing the aid supplies.
Viva Palestina's arrival in Gaza followed violent clashes between Egyptian security forces, Palestinians and members of the convoy.

Hours before the convoy's arrival, an Egyptian soldier was shot dead during a clash with Palestinian protesters who had gathered along the border to protest a delay in the convoy's arrival.

Egyptian forces opened fire to disperse the stone-throwing protesters, and at least 35 Palestinians were wounded in the ensuing clash, according to Hamas officials.

Late on Tuesday, more than 50 people were wounded during a clash between Egyptian authorities and international members of the convoy.

The protests were sparked by an Egyptian decision to allow 139 vehicles to enter Gaza through the Rafah crossing, but requiring a remaining 59 vehicles to pass via Israel.

Bitter disputes


The convoy, led by George Galloway, a British MP, had already been delayed by more than a week, after he and a delegation of Turkish MPs failed to persuade the Egyptians to change their mind.

The convoy of nearly 200 vehicles arrived in Egypt's port city of al-Arish on Monday after a dispute with Cairo on the route.

But the arrival came after a bitter dispute between its organisers and the government, which banned the convoy from entering Egypt's Sinai from Jordan by ferry, forcing it to drive north to the Syrian port of Lattakia.

Al Jazeera's Amr El Kahky, who has been travelling with the convoy, said Viva Palestina's organisers had hoped to reach Gaza by December 27.

"We're talking about an almost 10 day delay. The convoy members are happy to have reached their destination," he said.

"Many of them have taken time off from their jobs in Europe and other areas and that's why they're happy to deliver the aid and go back home to resume their normal lives. So their jubilation is justified."

Gaza blockade

Israel and Egypt have severely restricted travel to and from the Gaza Strip since Hamas seized power there in June 2007, after winning Palestinian legislative elections in 2006.

The blockade currently allows only very basic supplies into Gaza.

The siege has severely restricted essential supplies and placed Gazans in a dire situation, made worse by Israel's military assault last winter that reduced much of the territory to ruins.
Galloway, the convoy organiser, said the mission represents only "a drop in the ocean" as long as the siege on Gaza continues.

"No number of convoys is going to solve the problems here," he told Al Jazeera.

"So we're not only trying to bring in aid, we're trying to show the world there is a siege.
"If there is anyone who doubted there is a siege on Gaza, they certainly aren't doubting it now after the events of the last 31 days with this convoy."

6 January 2010

URGENT: Viva Palestina faced with 2,000 riot police in the port of Al-Arish!




Egypt Threatens to Break Promise to Allow Viva Palestina Convoy into Gaza

I have just received this from Scottish PSC.

It would seem that having tricked the members of the convoy to taking a boat to the Syrian port of Latakia and then down to El Arish, the regime of Egyptian dictator Mubarak is now determined to prevent the convoy going in.

No doubt Israel and the United States have made their views known and their puppet Mubarak is seeking to put them into effect.

In the meantime the marchers themselves are in extreme danger as the post below describes:

Tony Greenstein

To all friends of Palestine,

Our situation is now at a crisis point!

Riot has broken out in the port of Al- Arish. This late afternoon we were negotiating with a senior official from Cairo who left negotiations some two hours ago and did not return. Our negotiations with the official was regarding taking our aid vehicles into Gaza. He left two hours ago and did not come back.

Egyptian authorities called over 2,000 riot police who then moved towards our camp at the port. We have now blocked the entrance to the port and we are now faced with riot police and water cannons and are determined to defend our vehicles and aid. The Egyptian authorities have by their stubbornness and hostility towards the convoy, brought us to a crisis point. We are now calling upon all friends of palestine to mount protests in person where possible, but by any means available to Egyptian representatives, consulates and Embassy's and demand that the convoy are allowed a safe passage into Gaza tomorrow!

Kevin Ovenden

Viva Palestina Convoy Leader


Contact your MPs + put pressure on Egyptian authorities
- Contact the Egyptian Embassy:

Egyptian Embassy (Diplomatic Mission)E-Mail: eg.emb_london@mfa.gov.eg Tel.: 020 7499 3304 020 7499 3304
Egyptian Tourist OfficeTel.: 020 7493 5283 020 7493 5283
Egyptian Press and Information OfficeTel.: 020 7409 2236 020 7409 2236
- Contact our representatives & UK government:
Contact your MP: http://www.writetothem.com/
David Miliband (Foreign Secretary/Labour MP for South Shields)milibandd@parliament.uk (0191) 456 8910 (0191) 456 8910
British Embassy in EgyptTel: +(20)(2)27916000 +(20)(2)27916000 information.cairo@fco.gov.uk
Gaza Freedom Marchers issue the "Cairo Declaration" to end Israeli Apartheid

On 1 January 2010 Gaza Freedom Marchers approved a declaration aimed at accelerating the global campaign for Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) against Israeli Apartheid.
Roughly 1400 activists from 43 countries converged in Cairo on their way to Gaza to join with Palestinians marching to break Israel's illegal siege. They were prevented from entering Gaza by the Egyptian authorities.

As a result, the Freedom Marchers remained in Cairo. They staged a series of nonviolent actions aimed at pressuring the international community to end the siege as one step in the larger struggle to secure justice for Palestinians throughout historic Palestine.
This declaration arose from those actions: read the declaration

Scottish Government plan for 'trade mission' to Israel will shame Scotland
Last week Richard Falk, the Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the Palestinian territories occupied since 1967, told UN Radio:

“Obviously Israel does not respond to language of diplomacy, which has encouraged the lifting of the blockade and so what I am suggesting is that it has to be reinforced by a threat of adverse economic consequences for Israel,”
Universal jurisdiction in the UK empowers judges to issue arrest warrants for nearly any visitor accused of committing war crimes anywhere in the world. A delegation of senior Israel Defense Forces officers recently canceled a planned visit to the U.K. for fear they would be arrested upon landing. The four unidentified officers, holding ranks from major to colonel, are the latest in a string of Israeli politicians and military officials forced to call off travel to Britain over fears of legal prosecution relating to last year's offensive on the Gaza Strip. read full story

Israel has extended the detention without charge of Palestinian human rights activist Jamal Juma'. At his latest court appearance on 4 January 'Jamal was able to address the crowd prior to the hearing, stating, "This case is not only about me. It is an attack on those that are standing up against the wall and the occupation."... He went to make two further statements to the judge highlighting the appalling conditions of detention. He stated that the detention conditions are below "human dignity", creating and deteriorating health problems of the detainees. He concluded pointing at his shackles and the orange uniform - "just like those they use in Guantanamo."'

Within this context, it is shameful that the Scottish Government is funding a "trade mission" to Israel.

Scottish PSC has written to Scotland's First Minister urging an immediate cancellation of the trip, which falls on the first anniversary of Israel's war of aggression against the people of Gaza - that will only serve to reward Israel for their continuing violations of Palestinian human rights and international law.

The visit is due to take place 10-15 January 2010. Whether you live in Scotland or not we ask you to add your voice to this urgent appeal - your actions will matter. Write to the Scottish government now:

- The Scottish GovernmentAlex Salmond, Scotland's First Minister: FirstMinister@scotland.gsi.gov.uk Nicola Sturgeon, Scotland's Deputy First Minister: Nicola.Sturgeon.msp@scottish.parliament.uk Scottish Government Ministers: scottish.ministers@scotland.gsi.gov.uk

- Your MSPSearch for your Members of the Scottish Parliament by postcode: http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/msp/membersPages/MSPAddressPostcodeFinder.htmYou will have 1 constituency MSP and around 7 Regional MSPs
Read Scottish PSC letter to Alex Salmond, First Minister for Scotland.

4 January 2010

Israel's Continued Attacks on Bil'in

Two young men from Bil’in arrested on 29 December 2009 still held by Israeli military

This is a Report from the International Solidarity Movement on the village of Bil’in, which has been subject to unremitting violence from the Israeli army in an attempt to provoke violent resistance and at the same time to destroy the existing non-violent opposition to the theft of the village’s land.

When Israel talks about ‘terrorism’ we should bear in mind that when confronted with non-violence Israel does its best to ensure smash it with the utmost force, including as the report below shows, imprisoning 2 Palestinian child witnesses in order to force them to testify as witnesses.

This kind of behaviour is of course sanctioned by the West and the ‘hypocrite for change’ in the White House.
The International Solidarity Movement which produced the report has itself been subject to intense Israeli accusations that it is a ‘terrorist-supporter’ thus legitimising the attacks it has made on the organisation and its people.

Note also that the High Court decision that 25% of Bil'in's land be returned has been ignored, without any consequence, by the Military. This is not unusual in terms of the Occupation and once again demonstrates that the claims that Israel are a democracy are shallow and fraudulent.

See also Ha'aretz Editorial ‘War on protest

Tony Greenstein


Hamouda Imad Yassin (16) and Ibrahim Khalil Yassin (16), two young men from Bil’in, who were arrested on 29 December 2009 during a night raid on the West Bank village, are still being held by the Israeli military.

The boys were arrested at 2am on Tuesday, 29 December 2009, when the Israeli army, composed of a number of military jeeps and approximately 50 soldiers on foot, invaded the village and raided their houses. They are still being held by the military, while their relatives are being kept in the dark as of when they will be released and the legal reasons for their detention.

The only explanation given by the Israeli authorities was that they detained Hamouda and Khalil in order to ensure their presence as witnesses at a hearing with Mohammad Khatib, member of the Bil’in Popular Committee Against the Wall and Settlements, that was scheduled to take place later that day, 29 December 2009 at the Ofer military prison. He is charged with stone throwing, incitement and providing service to an unpermitted group. In a previous court hearing, the judge found the evidence presented to support the stone throwing charge to be falsified as it emerged that photographs shown of Mohammad Khatib allegedly throwing stones were taken on a day when he was abroad.

Mohammad Khatib commented on their arrest and continued detention:
"The fact that the Israeli military not only feels the need to present falsified evidence, but also resorts to invading the village in order to arrest children to testify against members of the Popular Committee shows their determination to crush the popular struggle through fabricated military trials. Luckily the military and occupation authorities have no understanding of the meaning of popular struggle. They would have to put all residents of the village in jail to stop the popular resistance and even then we would come out eventually, stronger and continue to struggle for our land and our freedom."
His hearing, however, has been postponed due to a strike of Palestinian lawyers protesting the closure of the Beituniya checkpoint, the only route providing access for relatives and lawyers
of Palestinian prisoners held at Ofer. Instead of releasing the two boys upon realizing the hearing has been cancelled, the Israeli military chose to keep them in detention, for an unknown period of time.

Their detention is just a part of an ongoing campaign through which the Israeli military seeks to ensure the end of Palestinian grassroots struggle against the Occupation and the Apartheid Wall. In Bil’in alone, 33 residents have been arrested since the beginning of a series of night raids conducted by the army. Almost a half still remain in detention, including Abdallah Abu Rahmah, arrested on 10 December 2009 and charged with incitement, stone throwing and arms possession, an accusation which has been brought against him merely for collecting and displaying spent tear-gas canisters, used against the Bil’in demonstrators by the Israeli army.

Mohammad Khatib’s new hearing has been scheduled for Monday, 4 January 2010 at 10:30am

For more information: Eva Adams / ISM Media Office: 054 344 2512 054 344 2512 / 059 7700 368 059 7700 368
Background information:

Bil'in: Inciting non-violence

Following initial construction of Israel’s wall on Bil’in’s lands in March 2005, residents organized almost daily direct actions and demonstrations against the theft of their lands. Garnering the
attention of the international community with their creativity and perseverance, Bil’in has become a symbol for Palestinian popular resistance. Almost five years later, Bil’in continues to have weekly Friday protests.

Located 12 kilometers west of Ramallah and 4 km east of the Green Line, Bil’in is an agricultural village spanning 4,000 dunams (988 acres) with approximately 1,800 residents.

While construction of and opposition to the Wall and began in 2005, the majority of land had been expropriated from Bil’in earlier.

Starting in the early 1980’s, and more significantly in 1991, approximately 56% of Bil'in's agricultural land was declared ‘State Land’ for the construction of the settlement bloc, Modi'in Illit (). Modi'in Illit currently holds the largest settler population of any settlement bloc, with over 42,000 residents and plans to achieve a population of 150,000

In addition to grassroots organizing, Bil’in has held annual conferences on popular resistance since 2006; providing a forum for activists, academics, and leaders to discuss strategies for the
unarmed struggle against the Occupation

Bil’in embraced legal measures against Israel as part of its multi-lateral resistance to the theft of their livelihoods. The village first turned to the courts in the fall of 2005. Two years after they
initiated legal proceedings, the Israeli High Court of Justice ruled that due to illegal construction in part of Modi'in Illit, unfinished housing could not be completed and that the route of the Wall be moved several hundred meters west, returning 25% of Bil’in’s lands to the village. To date, the high court ruling has not been implemented and construction continues.

In July 2008, Bil’in commenced legal proceedings before the Superior Court of Quebec against Green Park International Inc and Green Mount International Inc for their involvement in constructing, marketing and selling residential units in the Mattityahu East section of Modi’in
Illit

In an effort to stop the popular resistance in Bil’in, Israeli authorities intimidate demonstrators with physical violence and arrests.

Israeli armed forces have used sound and shock grenades, water cannons, rubber-coated steel bullets, tear-gas grenades, tear-gas canisters, high velocity tear-gas projectiles, 0.22 caliber live
ammunition and live ammunition against protesters.

On 17 April 2009, Bassem Abu Rahma was shot with a high-velocity tear gas projectile in the chest by Israeli forces and subsequently died from his wounds at a Ramallah hospital

Out of the 80 residents who have been arrested in connection to demonstrations against the Wall, 33 were arrested after the beginning of a night raid campaign on 23 June 2009. Israeli armed forces have been regularly invading homes and forcefully searching for demonstration participants, targeting the leaders of the Popular Committee Against the Wall and Settlements, as well as teenage boys accused of throwing stones at the Wall. Thirteen currently remain in
detention, most of which are minors.

The International Solidarity Movement (ISM) is a Palestinian-led non-violent resistance movement committed to ending Israel's illegal occupation of Palestinian land. We call for full compliance with all relevant UN resolutions and international law.

For specific media inquires such as interview requests, photo usage, etc. please email the ISM Media Office at media@palsolidarity.org.

Israel rejects bill allocating equal land to Jews and Arabs

Why a Jewish State cannot be a Democratic State


To the argument of 'left' Zionists that Israel is both a Jewish and a Democratic State, one merely needs to point to the issue of land. Without exception, land is confiscated from one section, Arabs, and given for the use of Jews. Quasi Autonomous National Organisations (Quangos) such as the Israeli Lands Administration, on which of course no Arab sits, regularly allocate land for the benefit of Jews only, in conjunction with their partners, the Jewish National Fund.


In the Mazuz case in 2005, the Israeli High Court held that the ILA must sell or lease to both Arabs and Jews. That decision has been comprehensively ignored, and as reported below, the latest attempt to circumvent it is to give 'reception committees' the final say as to whether Arabs will be admitted to their villages. This was rejected by the High Court but it will quite possibly be enshrined in legislation instead. The existing reception committees will, of course, be Jewish only and therefore this is a transparent attempt to preserve the existing apartheid situation.


The accompanying article shows how Israel's 'democracy' has rejected a fundamental of democracy - equality between citizens. Of course in a Jewish state land is deemed part of the national heritage, i.e. the Jewish component of the state.


For the sake of historical background I also include 2 articles from 2005 on the decision of the High Court and reactions to it from the major Zionist Parties, including Labour.


Meretz, including Mapam, welcomed the Court decision in 2005 but Meretz now has just 3 seats in the Knesset. Shinui has disappeared altogether. In short Israeli politics have moved more and more clearly to the racist right. The fact that a party leader, Menahem Porush could openly talk of wanting a situation where "Israel's land would only be sold to Jews." itself speaks volumes as to the racist and apartheid nature of Israel. In any other country but Israel such a person would be ostracised if not locked up.


Tony Greenstein


Haaretz Sunday, January 03, 2010

Israel rejects bill allocating equal land to Jews and Arabs

By Jonathan Liss

The Ministerial Committee for Legislation on Sunday rejected a bill proposed by MK Ahmed Tibi (Ra'am-Ta'al) proposing that the state enforce equal allocation of land to Jews and Arabs.

"Yet again, the Israeli government has proven that it is avoiding the principle of civil equality," Tibi said in response to the ruling. "The same government which approved the selection bill of [Jewish] MKs David Rotem and Israel Hasson, ignores Arabs' rights, and hasn't approved the building of a new Arab village since 1948. The government failed at the challenge I placed before it, and that saddens me."

The bill's authors stressed the importance of it in an explanation to the committee.

"Since the foundation of the state, the Israel Lands Administration is solely used as Jewish land administration. The director of the Israel Lands Administration has used all the tactics, with the help of the Jewish Agency, to allocate state land only to Jews. Despite the bitter attempt over the decades, not even one Arab town has been established since the state's foundation. Therefore a bill must be passed which stipulates that the Israel Lands Administration will serve all the state's citizens without discrimination on religion or nationality, and will promise an equal allocation of land to better the Arab population of Israel."

Tibi's proposal was intended to counter a bill passed two weeks ago which states that reception committees of Israeli communities can decide who will reside in their towns. One consequence of that bill is that Israeli Arabs would not be able to live in those towns if the reception committees decide so.


Historic Land Decision Made
Attorney General allows land to be purchased by Jews and Arabs alike
By TAL ROSNER
Published: 01.27.05, 09:49 / Israel News

TEL AVIV - Attorney General Menachem Mazuz decided Wednesday all land managed by Israel Lands Administration, including land owned by the Jewish National Fund, can be sold without discrimination to Jews and non-Jews alike.

Adalah, an organization for Arab minority rights, appealed to the High Court of Justice several months ago claiming state discrimination after Israel Lands Administration restricted non-Jews from partaking in a tender for land in the northern town of Carmiel.

The petition cited the Administration's decision as racist and contrary to the fundamental principle of equality.

The Administration submitted a response to the High Court in November saying "land owned by the Administration is for the development of Jewish settlements only, as all JNF money comes from Jewish donors."

Adalah said this decision contradicts the High Court's ruling in the Kadan case, whereby an Arab couple had requested permission to move to the settlement of Katzir, defined as "for Jews only."

The High Court had ruled the state and other affiliated agencies would be prohibited from discriminating against non-Jews, including all matters regarding land allocation.

JNF told Yedioth Ahronoth they have met with Justice officials to seek a solution to the decision, to either receive alternative land in exchange for land given to non-Jews, or to separate the JNF from the Administration.

"As long as the future of Israel's security is not secured, it's only fitting our land would be solely for Jewish settlers," a spokesman said.

Land Decision Slammed
Politicians rage over Attorney General decision to sell JNF land; Shinui and Meretz welcome change


By ILAN MARCIANO
TEL AVIV - Nation Union Knesset Member Arieh Eldad said Thursday he believes Attorney General Menachem Mazuz has violated the declaration of independence by choosing a democratic Israel over a Jewish state.

Eldad responded to Mazuz's decision to allow land managed by Israel Lands Administration, including land owned by the Jewish National Fund, to be sold without discrimination to Jews and non-Jews alike.

Eldad told Ynetnews he believes Prime Minister Ariel Sharon and Justice Minister Tzipi Livni should dismiss Mazuz, if they have "any trace left of Zionist conscience."

"But, I find it hard to believe the Prime Minister would do this," he said. "After all, Mazuz decided not to try him."

Likud Knesset Member Moshe Kachlon said he plans to convene a meeting with the Likud faction to discuss the party's stance on Mazuz's decision.

Agudath Yisrael Knesset Member Meir Porush said he believes Mazuz's decision demonstrates Israel has lost its standing as a Jewish state.

Porush said he would call for Knesset members to support him in trying to change Israel's basic land allocation law, so "Israel's land would only be sold to Jews."

National Religious Party Chairman Zevulun Orlev said he believes the decision contradicts Israel's definition as a Jewish state.

"JNF land does not belong to the state, it belongs to the Jewish nation," he said.

However, there are politicians who support the new decision.

Meretz Knesset Member Ran Cohen said he believes the decision is important because it acknowledges an attempt to changes years of discrimination.

"Finally a justice prevails for Israel's citizens," he said.

Shinui Knesset Member Ilan Shalgi said he believes JNF has a historical role which ended with the establishment of Israel.

"We are talking about leasing land, not transferring ownership," he said. "The state can keep an eye out to prevent land from falling into the hands of hostile countries."

National Democratic Assembly Knesset Member Jamal Zahalka said he believes this decision would not solve existing land allocation disputes.

"It's too little, too late," he said.

3 January 2010

Reflections on Merhavia - a Mapam kibbutz


The Hypocrisy of Mapam - the 'left' Zionist Party

Gideon Spiro, an Israel journalist, a founder of the refusenik soldiers group Yesh Gvul (there is a limit) and an anti-occupation activist, was asked to contribute some reminiscences to a volume of recollections to be printed to mark the 80th anniversary of the Merhavia Kibbutz. What he sent them was too critical and they asked him to remove those parts, which he refused to do so. The old stalinist origins of Kibbutz Ha'artzi/Mapam die hard. Spiro mentions that he used to work on the Mapam newspaper, Al Hamishmar, whose banner was adorned with the slogan, ‘To Zionism, Socialism and Friendship Between Nations’. As Spiro points out, the last 2 slogans were always for decorative effect but nonetheless the order is important. Zionism always came first!

Mapam were always the ‘left’ Zionist hypocrites, followers of the Russian Zionist social-democrat who was expelled from the Russian Social Democratic Party. Borochov ended his life in 1917 in the USA, a supporter of the British and Americans in the first world war. Mapam has always gone along with all the fundamentally racist aspects of Labour Zionism such as Jewish Labour, Land and Produce. Always with a heavy heart of course. Just as it participated in the expulsion of Palestinians in the Nakba, whilst learning to shoot and cry at the same time! Indeed they formed the kernel of the Zionist shock troops, Palmach, which carried out the key aspects of instilling terror in the Palestinian population through massacre and expulsion.

The second largest party in the Knesset after the 1949 elections in Israel it has today thrown its lot in with Meretz, which has just 3 parliamentary seats.

Tony Greenstein

Profile of Gideon Spiro
Gideon Spiro was born in Berlin in 1935. Three years later, shortly before the war, he left with his parents Gretta and Dr. Shmuel Spiro and his younger brother Johnny, to Jerusalem.
After graduating from Kibbutz Merhavia, he served in the army as a paratrooper, and took part in the 'Mitle' battle.

Gideon has been a journalist for many years. Amongst his various activities, he worked in New-York as a reporter for the newspaper "Al Hamishmar", and during his studies at the Haifa University he was the primary editor of the students` newspaper "Post Mortem".
In addition to being an activist in various Israeli and international peace and human rights movements, he was one of the founders of the "Yesh Gvul" peace movement and the "Israeli Committee for Mordechai Vanunu and for a Middle East Free of Atomic, Chemical and Biological Weapons".

Today he lives in Tel-Aviv.


Red Rag
Gideon Spiro
24 December 2009
(English translation 31 December 2009)

Merchavia stories

Kibbutz Merchavia, in the Jezreel Valley, recently celebrated its 80th anniversary. As one who lived in Marchavia for several years, first as a student at the “Educational Institution” (as secondary schools were called in the Kibbutz Artzi movement) and afterwards for a short time as a kibbutz member, I received an e-mail from the kibbutz in which I was asked to send reminiscences for inclusion in a volume that is soon to be published to mark the anniversary. I responded positively and submitted accounts of three things that had remained in my memory.

In reply, the editors of the volume informed me that they would publish my submission if I would omit the critical parts. I refused. I wrote to them that if they were going to constrain me at the outset to write only positive things, I would not write. Memories and their contexts are a personal matter, and it is not desirable to return the days when writings that were not consistent with the party or movement line were suppressed.

I asked Ha-Daf ha-Yaroq to publish what Merchavia had rejected. Ha-Daf ha-Yaroq [“The Green Page”] is the kibbutz movement’s weekly newspaper. In the past it was the weekly supplement of ’Al Ha-Mishmar, the Mapam party’s daily newspaper, for which I had sometimes worked as a journalist. After ’Al Ha-Mishmar shut down in March 1995, Ha-Daf ha-Yaroq passed into the hands of the Maariv Publishing. Its editors and journalists are kibbutz members. The current editor, Orit Prague, a member of Kibbutz Dafna, vacillated, but then she too decided not to publish my reminiscences in the end. I present them to you below.

Merchavia stories – three thoroughly personal reminiscences

1) The graduation insignia and what followed

The Gefen group was part of the Yehiam branch of the Hashomer Hatzair [1] youth movement. To the best of my recollection we were the first group that received our graduation insignia at the end of grade 11. The year was 1953. The discussions within the group before the distribution of the insignia were sometimes heart-rending – each of us was probed deeply. Not everyone could tolerate such inquisitiveness, and some burst into tears. But the moment the discussion about them stopped, those who had cried gleefully participated in the drilling into the souls of those whose turns came next.

As I recall it, the discussion about me was relatively benign and did not involve any tears on my part. Since I was also a group leader and had set up the clubhouse (in Upper Afula – something that with the passage of years became a source of conflict and controversy with Merchavia, but that’s another story), it was clear at the outset that I would receive the insignia, for it was inconceivable that someone who was considered suitable to be a group leader would not receive the graduation insignia.

In addition, one of the conditions for receiving the graduation insignia was a declaration of intent for “fulfillment” [hagshama], a concept that was taken very seriously in those days, the main component of which was a commitment to live on a kibbutz. According to the Movement’s guidelines it was not sufficient to say something amorphous like “I commit myself to ‘fulfillment’”; the members had to indicate with whom they would “fulfill”. Accordingly, for example, Dagi and Hazi, two other “outside children” in our group, announced that they would “fulfill” with the Yehiam Ramat Gan branch, of which they had been members before they arrived at Merchavia.

I requested to be excused from a detailed commitment – for in grade 11 it was too early – and to be permitted to make a general commitment. Before I went to Merchavia I was a member of Yehiam Jerusalem, and I did not want to tie myself to one branch or another at such an early age. The others did not agree. I was told that I had to declare with whom I would “fulfill”. Having no choice, I announced that I would “fulfill” right there at Merchavia.

I received the graduation insignia at a night-time ceremony, when with a Hashomer salute Meir Yaari, the head of the Movement and also a member of Merchavia, handed each of us the insignia. (apparently we had protektzia because of the Movement leader’s family relationship to Loshek, one of our teachers).

In those days the kibbutz movement saw itself as an elite group in Israeli society. Its representation among the decision-makers in the army, in the Knesset, in the government, in the economy was far out of proportion to its tiny demographic share of the population. “Fulfillment” was understood by us then, in 1953, as inauguration into the most lauded and valued segment of Israeli society.

We grew up with the tripartite slogan that appeared every morning on the masthead of the Mapam party newspaper ’Al Ha-Mishmar (may its soul rest in Paradise): “Zionism, Socialism and the Brotherhood of Peoples”. (later I was a correspondent for ’Al Ha-Mishmar in the USA and after that a columnist) Fifty-five years have passed since then, and in retrospect, that slogan looks like a groundless pretension.

Socialism and the Brotherhood of Peoples were there just for rhetorical effect. Zionism and the army – those were the important elements. No Arab could be accepted as a kibbutz member, not then and not today.

Kibbutzim of the Kibbutz Artzi movement were partners in the plunder of the lands of Palestinians who had been expelled from their lands (at Kibbutz Bar-Am and others). Mapam participated in all the governments headed by Mapai (which later became Labour, then the Alignment), which deepened the Occupation, and as the ruling party played a role in the criminal enterprise of building settlements. The principle of equality was shattered and after privatization the kibbutzim became a capitalist society in every sense, in which the weak were left behind.

Those who “fulfilled” definitely did not help to create an exemplary society in Israel; on the contrary: they helped to convert Israel into a violent, conquering, plundering, oppressive and racist society that rules over another people and denies them their basic human rights. Those who remained in Merchavia are proud of their sons who rose to high ranks in the Occupation army. People like me, who did not “fulfill” as requested by the Movement, definitely fulfilled a lot more socialism and brotherhood of peoples, through our participation in the struggle against the Occupation, racism and oppression, and our support for Occupation-refusers [2] in the framework of the struggle for democracy and equality on both sides of the Green Line.

2) The flocks and the vegetable garden

Every month my parents paid a very substantial sum throughout all the years I studied at the “Educational Institution” of Kibbutz Merchavia, and I assume the parents of the other “outside children” did the same. That fact did not confer upon us a position of full equality with the children of the kibbutz. I do not claim that there was deliberate discrimination – nothing like that, but although it was not stated in explicit and blatant terms, it was clear that the children of the kibbutz were a “master race” in a certain sense, and that the outside children were – how can I put it delicately – second-rank in the social hierarchy.

Among other things, this was manifested in the work details I received, which were thought to be less prestigious, and which no child of the kibbutz would have been willing to do. Accordingly I found myself first tending the flocks and afterwards working in the vegetable garden (or maybe it was the garden first and then the flocks).

In both details the work involved more than a little frustration. Milking the sheep was mortifying. Hard manual work, and the sheep and the goats would shit in the milking buckets.

In the vegetable garden we had to move the irrigation tubes from place to place, and harvesting the vegetables was painful for the back and the knees. The detail supervisor, Tuvia, would transmit instructions to the workers, most of whom were children from the “Institution” or from the Youth Society (who were at the bottom of the social hierarchy), and ensure that everyone carried out their tasks properly.

Despite all that, I did manage to find some moments of satisfaction in those two details.

In the vegetable garden it was necessary to shut off the irrigation system at night. I always volunteered for that task, because it involved driving a tractor. It was a golden opportunity to drive vehicles to which had no access to during regular work hours. Sometimes I would drive the big tractor, I think they called it a “Hanomag”, which for me was the closest thing driving a car. I had to overcome my fear of the dark night, for the drive out to the field was in oppressive darkness. There was no light at all at the vegetable garden, which was outside the kibbutz fence. But the drive made up for everything. I loved the driving the Hanomag very much. On the way back, just before the garage, there was a descent and I would put the gear stick into neutral and roll at a speed that was much faster than the tractor’s maximum speed. I would consider it irresponsible if one of my children did that today, but for me then, as a youth who yearned for the steering-wheel and who could not grip one during daylight hours, driving to the vegetable garden at night was a real joy.

Sometimes I would drive to the vegetable garden on the small tractor, which was a rather odd vehicle, orange in colour, its engine in the rear. It moved slowly and the gear stick was under the driver’s seat.

Besides those two there was another tractor, the Ferguson, which I never had the chance to drive, neither day nor night, and to this day I do not know why I never got do to that.

While tending the flocks I loved to go out to the pasture. I would stay there for hours, alone with the sheep, lost in my thoughts. One time I forgot to go back on time and suddenly I saw one of the two work-detail coordinators in front of me (his name eludes me), mounted on a donkey. He worriedly asked if something had happened. Nothing had happened, a young man had merely ascended on the wings of his imagination and forgotten about the sheep for a while.

3) Who stole my books?

After completing grade 12 and before joining the army, I decided to transfer all the books that I had received for my Bar Mitzvah from my parents’ home in Jerusalem to my room at the kibbutz. I asked the kibbutz carpenter (I don’t recall his name) to build me a cabinet for my books, and he complied with my request. It was a large quite a large cabinet that easily contained all the books. After I put the books away in the cabinet and locked it, I was confident that my books were reposing in a safe place. On one of my leaves from the army I returned to calamity: the cabinet with my books was gone. I racked my brains to think who in the kibbutz might be interested enough in Bar Mitzvah books to steal them. I came up with no answer then and to this day I still have no idea. If by chance the one who carried out the theft is still in the kibbutz, and if by some miracle he still has the books or knows what happened to them, I would be happy if he would enlighten me and return my property. I promise not to file a complaint with the police. The statute of limitations applies, in any case.

Translator’s notes

1. Hashomer Hatzair – literally, “the Young Guard” – is a left-wing Zionist youth movement, affiliated with Artzi kibbutz movement, the official full name of which is “Ha-Kibbutz Ha-Artzi – Ha-Shomer Ha-Tzair”, and the Mapam party.

2. Israeli youths who refuse to serve in the Israeli armed forces because of its role in perpetuating Israel’s occupation of the West Bank and Gaza Strip.

Translated from Hebrew for Occupation Magazine by George Malent.

1 January 2010

Mary Rizzo's 'Palestine Think Tank' Supports the Egyptian Regime's Attack on Gaza


Anti-Semitic web site SUPPORTS
Mubarak's attempt to Destro
y Viva Palestina and the Gaza Freedom March
For those who doubt where racism of any kind, anti-Semism included, leads, one has to read the article from the so-called Palestine Thinkthank that Gilad Atzmon and Mary Rizzo set up. Whereas 99% of the Palestine Solidarity Movement has rallied in support of the Gaza Freedom Marchers and Viva Palestina, in their attempts to break the blockade of Gaza, PTT gives full support to the Egypian regime of Mubarak, in its attempts to uphold the blockade. According to Haitham Sabba, it was apparently all Viva Palestina’s fault for getting the paper work wrong!

Who would have guessed that Egypt receives the second largest amount of US aid after Israel itself? Or that Mubarak’s regime is considered a lynchpin in terms of a US presence in the Middle East? Or that even amongst regimes considered brutal and repressive that Egypt stands in a league of its own? To say nothing of the fact that Mubarak was deputy to Anwar Sadat who first broke the breach in the wall by recognising the State of Israel?

Palestine Think Thank from its very beginning was a bastion of utter reactionaries and anti-semitic racists. As such you have an outlook whereby the world is divided into different ‘races’. Some are good and some, the Jews prime amongst them, are bad. It’s simple really. Mubarak is an Arab, Abbas is an Arab, therefore we should not criticise them.

If you divide the world in terms of race, because that is what we are talking about, then you disregard class. It is simply irrelevant. We are all Palestinians. And likewise a Zionist Jew is the same as an anti-Zionist Jew. Therefore you simply have no explanation for why the Egyptian regime tortures its own people and maintains the blockade of Gaza. After all they are Arab, so we should be quiet about it and let the Saudi ruling class gamble away the oil wealth whilst executing and cutting off the limbs of the poor and migrant labourers.

Anti-Semitism is and always has been the ideological and political refuge of the most bankrupt of reactionaries. It was the prop for the German steel barons and it is the first explanation for Arab collaborators and quislings be they ever so high, or as lowly as Sabbah. The difference is the former had all the power that imperialism bestows, whereas the Mubaraks of this world, and the Arabs like Sabbah that fawn upon them, merely imagine they are important. The PTT can’t comprehend that class loyalties and ties have a greater sway than national affiliations, hence why the Palestinian Authority operates as Israel’s junior partner in the West Bank. To Sabbah it is some kind of legitimate authority that bestows a seal of approval over Gaza’s isolation and siege.

In an article ‘Egypt Approves Gaza Freedom March Passage, Viva Palestina Blunders Paperwork and Blames Egypt’ Haitham Sabbah quotes from a press conference by Egyptian foreign minister, Ahmed Aboul Gheit. Apparently the said press conference ‘was boiling with Aboul Gheit's very firm and angry answers to the journalists' questions’. And well he might boil!

And in his article, Sabbah makes no mention of the Iron Wall that the US Army Corps of Engineers are constructing on Gaza’s southern border with Egypt. Indeed Sabbah, co-editor of PTT, supports Egypt’s Iron Wall.

Sabbah is pained because
no one has published any of the surprises or the good news which he [Gheit] carried for the Gaza Freedom March and the surprise he had for Viva Palestina…. Instead, searching the mainstream media today you will only get news about Egypt's arrest of activists in Cairo, the activist hunger strike, Viva Palestina's redirection to Syria, and so on.’
But there is, apparently ‘good news, Aboul Gheit announced that the Egyptians approved a limited number of Gaza Freedom March members to pass through and reach Gaza, Palestine, in the coming few days.’ It is of course an offer that the marchers have rejected, since it is a naked attempt at divide and rule.

I have been receiving a daily blog from a member of the Gaza Freedom Marchers, which I intend to publish later. It shows, from hour to hour, exactly what the conditions are for the marchers – the fears and the attacks, and being surrounded by the state goons of Mubarak and the exhiliration of breaking free, the support from local Egyptians and the determination of the marchers themselves not to be divided. None of this, of course, finds it way into Sabbah’s piece of PTT coverage.

But PTT is ever willing to accept Mubarak’s excuses as to why the regime has been less than keen to have the march go ahead.Align Centre
‘Aboul Gheit said… we identified that some of them want to reach the Egyptian Rafah to exercise unlawful acts which deal with the Egyptian construction (referring to the Iron Wall), which means demonstration against Egypt, and some tried to hold contacts in Egypt’.
In other words some activists had apparently planned protests against the US/Egyptian iron wall and further the demonstrators did not seem to understand that they had come to a police state, financed by the US and supported by Israel! They should have been cowed and acted deferentially to the Egyptian state and its security forces.

This is of course an unsupported, and indeed unlikely allegation, given that the priority was getting into Gaza, not protesting about the outrageous wall that Mubarak and the USA are constructing. But the ‘Think-Tank’ is happy to give it legs. Naturally, just like the PTT itself, the Egyptian regime resorts to conspiracies to explain away their unpopularity.
‘Aboul Gheit added, "Those thousands of people trying to conspire against Egypt, all that we will do is to let them in our streets, seeking to provoke the Egyptians, but the Egyptians are wiser, especially after we saw that all these demonstrations have been limited to those foreigners who tried to invoke the Egyptian security, who had not provoked, stressing that these will be in the hospitality of this magnificent sun, until the end of their desire to stay and they leave."
And even worse they had done something most Egyptians do not dare – they had gone on demonstrations! Sabbah concludes by saying that
‘this is a very embarrassing day for activists around the world. At least for those who follow and support both, Gaza Freedom March and Viva Palestina. Both of them … have intentions for uncalled propaganda against Egypt which all activists and Palestinians are better off without.

Gaza Freedom March seems not in control of who joins and who is not supposed to, especially since it is clear that many of them did not comply with the Egyptian request of providing the details they requested ahead of time.

On the other hand, Viva Palestina never mentioned anything about Egyptian pre-approval to pass through Al-Arish. At least not to the mass followers, supporters and activists.’

And amazingly Sabbah finishes off by calling for an apology to Egypt (read the regime of Mubarak, since most Egyptians support the marchers). This is also a common mistake of nationalists – to confuse a regime with the people suffering under that regime.
‘Only apologizing to Egypt in a public press conference can make one forgive these fatal mistakes which made Egypt sound as THE enemy deflecting our sight from the real enemy and the real reason behind all this atrocities that Gazans and Palestinians live in, ISRAEL.
Most, but by no means all of the comments were critical. In particular
Sabbah received fulsome support from co-editor, Mary Rizzo. Sabbah continued to put his foot in it with his support for the Iron Wall of Mubarak and Obama.
‘The "Wall of shame" as you call it is a different story. tell Hamas to stop smuggling drugs (one of many reasons) in and out from Gaza then we can speak about it. Keeping in mind that if Egypt wants to cut aid to Gaza, all what they need to do is close the road that leads to Egyptian Rafah.
… Is Egypt occupying my land? No, it is Israel. Are the Egyptians closing Rafah crossing by their own? No, the Palestinian Authority asked them to do that. So if Galloway want to blame anyone and not the Israeli occupation, then it is the PA and Hamas. But Galloway have his political agenda supported by Iran to smear Egypt.’
And there you have the full stupidity of the Arab quisling. ‘It’s not the Arabs who are taking away our land, it’s the Jews’. Yes but don’t those who sell them that land, who connive in its occupation, who aid and abet the siege of Gaza and run the quisling authority in Ramallah share any guilt? After all guilt and responsibility are not finite. But Sabbah has just got into his stride:
‘Let's assume the border is open, wont you have to pass through passport regulations at your country? That's the case everywhere. So, who decide if you or me can leave Gaza or not? What if I was a criminal running away from my country, how would Egyptians know? This is the responsibility of PA and national boarder police, which is NOT Hamas and which Hamas refusing to install back.’
These too are the arguments of supporters of immigration controls. Apparently the blockade was imposed, not to subvert the will of the Palestinian electorate who had voted in Hamas, but to stop criminals escaping (though Israel seems to let them in and become cabinet ministers!). But Sabbah continues digging:
‘So, keeping just the above example in mind, why would Egypt open the boarders? At the end of the day they have the right to protect their citizens.

The Convoy claimed objective is to aid and help Gazans and expose ISRAEL, not Egypt. They could have changed their plan or asked their own governments to negotiate with Israel to let them in, not ask Egypt to do that on their behalf and smear them if they don't…

Last but not least, the Iron Wall. You are a Gazan, and I'm a Palestinian like you. We all know who controls the tunnels, and what they are used for. Who can dig a tunnel and who can't. What can be brought from Egyptian Rafah and what should not. And we all know that the tunnels are not used ONLY for food. In fact food is just a cover to many other businesses and even worse a passage for terrorist groups such as Al-Qaedaa and their likes which Gaza are full with these days. If this is not enough reason for Egypt to construct this iron wall, I don't know what can be a good reason.’
So there we have it. Full support from the Palestinian ‘Think Tank’ for the Iron Wall of Mubarak, Obama and Netanyahu (not forgetting Abbas of course!). But Sabbah hasn't finished:
It is clear to me and many more activist now that this convoy drove thousands miles just to promote anti-Mubarak regime campaign, which is not what we hope for. yes, the Egyptian regime can do more, but let me remind you that this campaign served Israel more than it helped Gazans.’
And then Mary Rizzo jumps into rescue her forlorn colleague.
‘It is clear that PA approves the Rafah closing. Israel wants to shift the control of the bad, bad, bad Gazans to their agents in Palestine Authority who will do the work for them, so yes, the PA has to be held accountable for this.
3) in the anniversary of the war, what has been the argument? DIVISION of the Arabs, brother against brother and the bad party is not Israel, who are only mentioned in passing and are looking on, perhaps, gleefully… activists are discussing actions to hurt Egypt and spending energy in rage against Egypt. There is a lot to be enraged about, but why not have kept this campaign WORLD against Israel? Was it necessary to further divide an already fragmented Arabhood?

4) We heard that Galloway did not like the conditions. Until we see something in writing, we will assume NO conditions were changed once they arrived and that Galloway agreed to bargain with Egypt.This is wrong.

5) What does one go to break a siege for and then bargain? There were other ways to do it and were these not attempted? As suggested by Haitham, BY SEA. Why was this not done?...

9) If the road is open, there is no more need for tunnels, and I can't go into an argument I know nothing in detail on. Haitham lives with Arab radio and TV so he knows more than I do and I don't believe the drug traffic between Egypt and Israel he mentions is a lie, however, I have no way of knowing.

10) Letting Israel fall out of the spotlight of shame was a terrible thing to have happen.’
Rizzo of course is an inveterate anti-Semite and when she says she wants the spotlight to be on Israel, she poses the whole question of Palestinian liberation in a typically chauvinist and racist way. The fact that Mubarak is complicit in maintaining the siege is immaterial. His is an Arab regime there is should not be criticized. Israel is Jewish therefore it can be. And if that means blaming George Galloway, whose role has been invaluable, then so be it.

It is interesting though that Atzmon’s ex-collaborator is actually supporting the attempt by the Mubarak regime to sabotage Viva Palestina and likewise that she is also supporting the Iron Wall. As she explains:
‘There will always be a Palestine, and it is from the River to the Sea, and it is under Jewish Israeli military occupation and this has been supported wrongly and indecently by many many players, including those who certainly should never have allowed Arabhood to be in discussion and should never have abandoned this cause for their own personal reasons..… the fomenting of divisions is what Israelis/Jews have been driving at and love. I also believe that if we are "fighting" amongst ourselves, it is because we don't want Palestinians to be taken advantage of or fooled by good intentions, etc… To get every zionist out of their land and to get every Palestinian who will sell them to Zionists out of office.’
In other words to expel every Israeli (though to where she does not say). This is the logic of the anti-semitic ‘supporters’ of Palestine. But for the fact that PTT represents no-one and nobody this would provide ammunition to those who say support for the Palestinians is anti-semitic. In the midst of such madness, at least ex-leftist Jeff Blankfort, with whom I’ve crossed swords, puts it well when says that:
‘I confess I find myself astounded, confounded and disgusted by Haitham's defense of Egypt in its responses to both the Gaza Freedom March and Viva Palestina. Had the Egyptian government not demonstrated for some years that is a tool both of the US and Israel (with the former being the tool of the latter), he might have had a leg to stand on. But he doesn't.
Egypt, not Israel, has to bear FULL responsibility for keeping its border with Gaza sealed. The police state of Egypt is simply an accessory to Israel's crimes out of fear of loss of aid at the hands of the US Congress which is constantly threatening to cut Egypt's billion plus annual funding.’
Quite. But when you lie down with dogs Jeff, it's no surprise you end up with fleas.

For one of the many Palestinian sites which do recognise reality rather than deal with racial fantasies, I recommend The Palestine Telegraph's reports.

Tony Greenstein